Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time.

I have SharePoint 2010 Enterprise running SP1. Configuration is one SharePoint server in the farm and a SQL 2008 R2 database for the backend. Our user environment is 80 users with very little load on the SharePoint server. I have the workflow timer
set to 1 minute.
I have a SPD workflow that starts manually on a form library. Whenever I publish a new version of the workflow, the next time I start the workflow it takes the full minute to finish. If I click on the workflow status before it finishes, I see the message
"Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will
attempt to resume at a later time.". After the minute completes the workflow finishes.
Here's the weird thing, the next time I start the workflow, it runs in a couple of seconds - almost instantly. I've tried up to 15 times after the inital publishing and everything seems to work fine on initiation.
Well, that would be fine for me, however, I intermintantly get this heavy load message during task processes that are running inside the workflow. It's probably less than 5% of the time. It's really frustrating though so I appreciate some help. I'm look
online and haven't found anything that describes my situation.
Thank you in advance!

Hi,
Before considering an additional hardware try to change following configurations for workflow:
Increase Throttle Size
Increase Batch Size
Time Out
Workflow Timer Interval
AutoCleanUpDays
Increase Throttle Size
The Workflow throttle setting controls how many Workflows can be processing at any one time on the entire server farm. By increasing the throttle it will allow the number of Workflows execution or can be initiated at a time.
Use below PowerShell command to get the current Throttle Size:
Get-SPFarmConfig |
Select WorkflowPostponeThreshold
Use below PowerShell command to set new Throttle Size:
Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowPostponeThreshold
100
Increase Batch Size
This is the size that determines number of events processed for a single Workflow instance. Default value is 100, but it can be range from 1 to any number.
Use below PowerShell command to get the current Batch Size:
Get-SPFarmConfig |
Select WorkflowBatchSize
Use below PowerShell command to set new Batch Size:
Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowBatchSize
200
Time Out
This decides the time out of the Workflow event. The default value is 5 and can be any integer. The time is in minute.
Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
stsadm -o getproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout
Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
stsadm -o setproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout -pv “15″
Workflow Timer Interval
This setting is applicable at Web Application level and not the farm level. The workflow timer interval specifies how often the workflow SPTimer job fires to process pending workflow tasks. This interval also represents the granularity of delay timers within
your workflow. If a timer is set to delay for one minute, but the interval timer fires only every five minutes, the workflow delays for five minutes, not one minute.
Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
stsadm -o getproperty -pn job-workflow -url <Web Application Url>
Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
stsadm -o setproperty -pn job-workflow -pv “Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30″ -url <Web Application Url>
Here is the url for reference :
http://praveenkasireddy.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/workflow-due-to-heavy-load-the-latest-workflow-operation-has-been-queued-it-will-attempt-to-resume-at-a-later-time/

Similar Messages

  • Note: Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time

    Dear all,
    sorry for opening another thread on this.
    I think I have a performance issue with workflows attached to document sets in SharePoint. And I say “I think” because people keep telling me that this is the way it just is.
    The user creates a new document set, which triggers a workflow in which the user has to confirm/review/approve a series of tasks. The time it takes from clicking the OK button on those task form to the workflow status moving to the next step is about 4 seconds.
    And visiting that status page within those 4 seconds brings up the infamous “Note: Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time.” message.
    Hitting Refresh in the browser after those 4 seconds will make the new workflow status appear and the red text go away.
    Is that normal? Is that the performance that everyone else is seeing as well?
    I struggle to see why simply moving a workflow from one task to another should take that on a machine that isn’t doing anything else at the time.
    (1)   
    I have a standalone (non-clustered) SharePoint box, 4 CPUs, 8 GB of memory, more than half of that available, acting as application server and wfe; only the database is on different box.
    (2)   
    The CPU only goes up to 18 or 19%, so CPU does not seem to be the bottleneck. Half the RAM is also still free.
    (3)   
    The workflow is designed with Nintex, and has about 9 flexi and review tasks – the last 2 of them in a loop iterating over typically 3 or 4 items.
    (4)   
    Looking at the logs it looks like the processing in Nintex only takes about 1 second – I don’t know where the other 3 seconds are going.
    (5)   
    There is nothing obvious in the logs.
    (6)   
    We’ve looked at all the “theoretical” improvements around throttling and batch sizes etc. – none of them appeared make any difference. And the workflow is so small that it looks like my tasks gets executed straight away. The problem appears
    to be that the execution takes too long(?) and therefore has not finished by the time the page get redrawn.
    (7)   
    I am running perfmon and I can e.g. see one(!) workflow being loaded into memory – as expected as I am the only user.
    (8)   
    I am seeing a total of 3(?) SQL queries being executed(?). I get the Bytes Sent/sec spiking at 25K, and Bytes received at 18K. But is this good or bad or a bottleneck?
    Where do I take it from here?
    I have been told that “[…] most customers have no issue with this as they are used to the way SP operates and it can be slow at times.” Is it really that bad?
    If it is worth watching more performance counters then I’d need to know what to compare them to.
    Is there something else I am missing?
    Thanks
    Martin

    Hi,
    Before considering an additional hardware try to change following configurations for workflow:
    Increase Throttle Size
    Increase Batch Size
    Time Out
    Workflow Timer Interval
    AutoCleanUpDays
    Increase Throttle Size
    The Workflow throttle setting controls how many Workflows can be processing at any one time on the entire server farm. By increasing the throttle it will allow the number of Workflows execution or can be initiated at a time.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Throttle Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Throttle Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowPostponeThreshold 100
    Increase Batch Size
    This is the size that determines number of events processed for a single Workflow instance. Default value is 100, but it can be range from 1 to any number.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Batch Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowBatchSize
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Batch Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowBatchSize 200
    Time Out
    This decides the time out of the Workflow event. The default value is 5 and can be any integer. The time is in minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout -pv “15″
    Workflow Timer Interval
    This setting is applicable at Web Application level and not the farm level. The workflow timer interval specifies how often the workflow SPTimer job fires to process pending workflow tasks. This interval also represents the granularity of delay timers within
    your workflow. If a timer is set to delay for one minute, but the interval timer fires only every five minutes, the workflow delays for five minutes, not one minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn job-workflow -url <Web Application Url>
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn job-workflow -pv “Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30″ -url <Web Application Url>
    Here is the url for reference :
    http://praveenkasireddy.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/workflow-due-to-heavy-load-the-latest-workflow-operation-has-been-queued-it-will-attempt-to-resume-at-a-later-time/

  • Workflow. Latest workflow operation has been queued

    Good day,
    I have sequential workflow which Is started after item created in list. Sometimes, after start of workflow in status I can
    see note:
    Due to heavy load, the latest workflow
    operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time.
    After several page refreshes it disappears.
    Can I somehow make this note not to appear?

    Hi,
    Before considering an additional hardware try to change following configurations for workflow:
    Increase Throttle Size
    Increase Batch Size
    Time Out
    Workflow Timer Interval
    AutoCleanUpDays
    Increase Throttle Size
    The Workflow throttle setting controls how many Workflows can be processing at any one time on the entire server farm. By increasing the throttle it will allow the number of Workflows execution or can be initiated at a time.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Throttle Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Throttle Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowPostponeThreshold 100
    Increase Batch Size
    This is the size that determines number of events processed for a single Workflow instance. Default value is 100, but it can be range from 1 to any number.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Batch Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowBatchSize
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Batch Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowBatchSize 200
    Time Out
    This decides the time out of the Workflow event. The default value is 5 and can be any integer. The time is in minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout -pv “15″
    Workflow Timer Interval
    This setting is applicable at Web Application level and not the farm level. The workflow timer interval specifies how often the workflow SPTimer job fires to process pending workflow tasks. This interval also represents the granularity of delay timers within
    your workflow. If a timer is set to delay for one minute, but the interval timer fires only every five minutes, the workflow delays for five minutes, not one minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn job-workflow -url <Web Application Url>
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn job-workflow -pv “Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30″ -url <Web Application Url>
    Here is the url for reference :
    http://praveenkasireddy.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/workflow-due-to-heavy-load-the-latest-workflow-operation-has-been-queued-it-will-attempt-to-resume-at-a-later-time/

  • An error was received while reading backup file- Cancelling Operating system error 995(The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request.).

    Hi,
    We have been getting the below error while restoring a database onto SQL Server 2008. We are using lite speed and performing a full restore. When we restart the server, the restore is completed cleanly but every 3 or 4 days once, the restore is failing.
    We have tried everything from installing a patch that was supposed to fix it but it is not.
    Error Message:
    BackupIoRequest::ReportIoError: read failure on backup device 'VDI_7D17E958-2468-45A8-B7F0-EB73D0BF0F3A_3'. Operating system error 995(The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request.).
    The backup is getting validated successfully but failing while trying to read it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Sree

    Hello,
    I would try to get the latest update for the LiteSpeed software, based on the following thread:
    http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?t=5968
    Please read the following article too:
    http://troubleshootingsql.com/2011/02/09/troubleshooting-that-darn-backup-error/
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request

    Using the latest version of mvmc which supports conversion to 2012 R2, we get an error as above during the conversion process (just before it gets to Analyse disks).
    FYI, the log snippets are:-
    08/22/2014 06:57:23 +01:00  [5]  VERBOSE: End of initializing (D:\mvmc\tempconverted\MVMC\0\disk-0.vhdx).
    08/22/2014 06:57:33 +01:00  [5]  VERBOSE: System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.ExportLease.GetFiles(IDownloadAdapter adapter, String host, DirectoryInfo dirInfo, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.VirtualMachine.DownloadFiles(IDownloadAdapter downloadAdapter, String toPath, TaskContext context)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToDrives(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, IPostProgress& provisionHyperVPhase, IVirtualMachine& sourceVM, TaskContext taskContext)
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [5]  EXCEPTION: System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.ExportLease.GetFiles(IDownloadAdapter adapter, String host, DirectoryInfo dirInfo, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.VirtualMachine.DownloadFiles(IDownloadAdapter downloadAdapter, String toPath, TaskContext context)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToDrives(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, IPostProgress& provisionHyperVPhase, IVirtualMachine& sourceVM, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToMachine(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.<>c__DisplayClass6.<ConvertToMachineAsync>b__5()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1.InnerInvoke()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute()
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [5]  Exception caught : System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Gui.Model.ConversionModel.ConvertGuestMachine()
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Gui.ViewModels.Machine.MachineCompletionViewModel.OnWorkerDoWork()
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [1]  Conversion error message is displayed.
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [1]  Value of 'ErrorMessage' = 'The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request'
    Any ideas what could be causing this and a fix?
    Regards
    Ian

    Same Issue converting SBS 2011 with Exchange Decommissioned. Was hoping the error would go away after decom of Exchange but no luck.
    Hoping Microsoft gets us an answer on this because the idea behind the tool is fantastic.
    Move was to 2012 R2 from VMware 5.
    Will have to use disk2vhd /fingerscrossed
    http://vniklas.djungeln.se/2014/10/13/mvmc-3-0-released-with-p2v-support/
    SBS may not be supported, but have received this err otherwise as well.
    Failure Log:
    11/20/2014 19:41:26 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Before You Begin' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:31 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Before You Begin' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:31 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Machine Type' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:33 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Machine Type' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:33 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Migration Destination' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:44 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Migration Destination' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:44 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Hyper-V Host' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'MachineName' = '192.168.168.5'
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'UseSessionCredentials' = 'True'
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Pressing Next on the 'Hyper-V Host' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Displaying busy cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Validating the credentials'.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [4]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Displaying normal cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Hyper-V Host' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Disk' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:11 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'DestinationMachineSharePath' = '\\192.168.168.5\SBS01'
    11/20/2014 19:42:11 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'IsFixedDisk' = 'True'
    11/20/2014 19:42:11 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Disk' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:11 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Source' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'MachineName' = '192.168.168.48'
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'UseSessionCredentials' = 'False'
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Pressing Next on the 'Source' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Displaying busy cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Validating the credentials'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [6]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Displaying normal cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Source' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Virtual Machines' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Displaying busy cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Getting list of virtual machines'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [8]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Displaying normal cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:01 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'VirtualMachine.DNSName' = 'SBS01.domain.local'
    11/20/2014 19:43:01 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Virtual Machines' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:01 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Connection' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'MachineName' = 'SBS01.domain.local'
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'UseSessionCredentials' = 'False'
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Pressing Next on the 'Connection' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Displaying busy cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Validating the credentials'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [6]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [6]  VERBOSE:
    Hyper-V server (192.168.168.5) supports VHDX: True.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Displaying normal cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Connection' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Workspace' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'WorkspacePath' = 'E:\Hyper-V\Virtual Hard Disks'
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Workspace' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Summary' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Verifying if conversion can proceed based on inputs'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [7]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:43:57 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:43:57 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'SummaryPageConversionWarnings' = 'Warning(s):
    1: The number of USB devices configured on the VMware guest machine is 1. The USB devices will be ignored on the converted machine.
    2: The video memory configured on the VMware guest machine is greater than 4 MB. The video memory will be limited to 4 MB on the converted machine.
    11/20/2014 19:43:57 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:43:57 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:44:07 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Summary' page.
    11/20/2014 19:44:07 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Completion' page.
    11/20/2014 19:44:07 -06:00  [3]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Evaluating Machine conversion request:
     Machine Conversion Request Received:
      Source Host:                        https://192.168.168.48/sdk
      Guest Virtual Machine:              SBS01.domain.local   Use Windows user account = False
      Destination Host:                   192.168.168.5   Use Windows user account = True
      Destination VHD path:               \\192.168.168.5\SBS01   Use Windows User account = True
      Destination VHD Type:               FixedHardDisk
      Destination VHD Format:             Vhdx
      Final Source VM Power state:        On
      Final Destination VM Power state:   Off
      Copy OVF File:                      False
      Guest VM ID:                        3
      Leave Tools Installed:              False
      Requested Provisioning:             HyperV
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    VM SBS01 has Scsi device 0:0 - disk-0.vmdk
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Destination operating system information:
      Operating System Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
      Version:               6.3.9600
      Service Pack:          Service Pack 0,0
      CIMOS Type:            18
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Mvmc.Gui, Version=3.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Machine Conversion Request Received:
      Source Host:                        https://192.168.168.48/sdk
      Guest Virtual Machine:              SBS01.domain.local   Use Windows user account = False
      Destination Host:                   192.168.168.5   Use Windows user account = True
      Destination VHD path:               \\192.168.168.5\SBS01   Use Windows User account = True
      Destination VHD Type:               FixedHardDisk
      Destination VHD Format:             Vhdx
      Final Source VM Power state:        On
      Final Destination VM Power state:   Off
      Copy OVF File:                      False
      Guest VM ID:                        3
      Leave Tools Installed:              False
      Requested Provisioning:             HyperV
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Connecting to source host.
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Querying destination Hyper-V Host OS.
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Destination operating system information:
      Operating System Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
      Version:               6.3.9600
      Service Pack:          Service Pack 0,0
      CIMOS Type:            18
    11/20/2014 19:44:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Querying source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:44:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    VM SBS01 has Scsi device 0:0 - disk-0.vmdk
    11/20/2014 19:44:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Guest VMware information:
      VM Name:         SBS01
      Host:            SBS01.domain.local
      Tools Installed: True
      Guest OS:        Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 (64-bit)
      GuestId:         windows7Server64Guest
      Memory (bytes):  8589934592
      Processors:      4
      Network Cards:   1
      Disks:           1
    11/20/2014 19:44:19 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    This conversion will proceed on-line.
    11/20/2014 19:44:19 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Creating snapshot of the source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:48:58 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Preparing source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:48:58 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Preparing source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:48:58 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Finished creating snapshot of the source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:49:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Querying source virtual machine OS.
    11/20/2014 19:49:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Guest operating system information:
      Operating System Name: Microsoft Windows® Small Business Server 2011 Standard 
      Version:               6.1.7601
      Service Pack:          Service Pack 1,0
      CIMOS Type:            18
    11/20/2014 19:49:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Uninstall VMware Tools and shutdown Request Received:
      Guest Virtual Machine:        SBS01.DAKMONDMN.local   Use Windows user account = False
      System32 directory:          C:\Windows\system32
    11/20/2014 19:50:01 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Downloading VMware virtual disks from source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:50:01 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Downloading device (/3/VirtualLsiLogicSASController0:0) disk-0.vmdk
    11/20/2014 19:50:01 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Initializing (E:\Hyper-V\Virtual Hard Disks\MVMC\0\disk-0.vhdx) with a size of 644245094400 with preallocate true.
    11/20/2014 20:28:10 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    End of initializing (E:\Hyper-V\Virtual Hard Disks\MVMC\0\disk-0.vhdx).
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The connection was closed unexpectedly.
       at stsc
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.VirtualMachine.DownloadFiles(IDownloadAdapter downloadAdapter, String toPath, TaskContext context)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToDrives(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, IPostProgress& provisionHyperVPhase, IVirtualMachine& sourceVM, TaskContext taskContext)
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Restoration of the source virtual machine has been successfully completed. The source VMware VM is powered on.
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [3]  EXCEPTION:
    System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The connection was closed unexpectedly.
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.ExportLease.GetFiles(IDownloadAdapter adapter, String host, DirectoryInfo dirInfo, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.VirtualMachine.DownloadFiles(IDownloadAdapter downloadAdapter, String toPath, TaskContext context)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToDrives(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, IPostProgress& provisionHyperVPhase, IVirtualMachine& sourceVM, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToMachine(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.<>c__DisplayClass6.<ConvertToMachineAsync>b__5()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1.InnerInvoke()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute()
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [3]  Exception caught : System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The connection was closed unexpectedly.
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Gui.Model.ConversionModel.ConvertGuestMachine()
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Gui.ViewModels.Machine.MachineCompletionViewModel.OnWorkerDoWork()
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [1]  Conversion error message is displayed.
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'ErrorMessage' = 'The request was aborted: The connection was closed unexpectedly.'

  • BackupVirtualDeviceFile::RequestDurableMedia: Flush failure on backup device 'CA_BAB_MSSQL_e85860_10001_2085d987_ERP_DATABASE_ST_1'. Operating system error 995(The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application reque

    hello,
    i getting the following error message in event id while backing up my SQL db by third party backing tool
    BackupVirtualDeviceFile::RequestDurableMedia: Flush failure on backup device 'CA_BAB_MSSQL_e85860_10001_2085d987_ERP_DATABASE_ST_1'. Operating system error 995(The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request.).
      <Data>995(The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request.)
    please suggest the solution.

    Hi pulkit,
    According to your description, the actual error could be caused by but not limited to the following issues: Memory issues, Third Party issues, or SQL Server issues and so on. However, as shanky post, if you use an external or third party backup tool like
    NetBackup, BackupExec, or one of the many other tools available for backing up SQL Server databases without having to write your own backup scripts, and the error occurs. You need to check if there are some issues about your VDI or SQLVDI.DLL. Meanwhile,
    you also need to troubleshooting Memory Issue or the third tool issue. For more information about troubleshooting the error 995 when backing up database via the third party tool. You can review the following blog.
    https://support.software.dell.com/kb/SOL14674
    In addition, the error may include additional text from the operating system indicating that the disk is full. When performing a backup or restore operation with third-party backup software an additional message may occur indicating that the backup failed.
    Perform the following tasks as appropriate:
     1. Review the underlying system error messages and SQL Server error messages preceding this one to identify the cause of the failure.
     2. Ensure that the backup and restore medium has sufficient space.
     3. Correct any errors raised by third-party backup and restore software.
    There is also detail about backing up database via T-SQL statement /GUI, you can review the following article.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187510.aspx
    Regards,
    Sofiya Li
    Sofiya Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • "The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or..."?

    I keep getting the same error message every time I try to get the pictures off of my iphone. I have tried using the Kodak EasyShare software I have, and simply clicking "get photos" through "My Computer". The error messages reads: The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request.
    Anyone??

    I keep getting the same error message every time I try to get the pictures off of my iphone. I have tried using the Kodak EasyShare software I have, and simply clicking "get photos" through "My Computer". The error messages reads: The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request.
    Anyone??

  • In Outlook, when clicking on any hyperlink, I am getting the message "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator." How can I fix this?

    Looking at other forums, this problem is related to the browser settings. As I use Firefox 3.5.11 I'm hoping this forum will work.

    See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q310049 You receive an error message when you click a hyperlink in Outlook (default browser)

  • When I try to launch Firefox I get the message, "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator". The only way I can launch the browser is to re-install it every time.

    I cannot find any obvious restrictions on the computer. In the Control Panel under Set Program Access and Defaults, Enable Access to This Program is checked.

    See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q310049 You receive an error message when you click a hyperlink in Outlook (default browser)

  • HT4623 I started to install the latest version it has been downloading for 4 days and won't go any further

    My emails will not open onto the internet I'm finding I have to go in manually why is this happening could someone please help me sort this out thanks

    Is iTunes updated on your computer?     Are all apps updated on computer?
    Turn off wifi and use cable to connect to iPad   
    Update.
    Reset settings.
    Reboot the iPad

  • "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer". Two forests and one transitive trust

    Hello. I manage one windows 2003 domain with a trust to a windows 2008 domain.
    The users with the 2008 domain accounts are supposed to (and they do) authenticate when using my workstations. The problem is that the 2008 has very restrictive policies such as no writing on "C:", no access no "CMD", windows explorer,
    etc. This also causes the error "This  operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer" when opening some programs on my workstations when using the 2008 domain accounts. I need to override the incoming policy,
    but since these are two completely different forests, I thing the "Block Policy inheritance" at my domain policy won't do much. 
    Any ideas on how to accomplish this?
    Thanks and regards
    Dave

    Thanks for the reply. Yes, but the amount of incoming policies is, for what I've been told, huge. Is there a general setting to allow the users to run software as if they were on my domain?
    Thanks and regards.
    Dave
    You can simply use rsop.msc or gpresult to identify applied policies. Once done, you can identify which settings to overwrite and configure the GPO for overwriting.
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • [Win Server 2008 R2]This Operation Has Been Cancelled Due to Restrictions in Effect on This Computer

    Environment:
    Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 as DC
    2 Domain administrator accounts: the built-in Administrator and a manually created which belongs to the Administrator group
    Problem Description:
    When I logged into the server using the Administrator account, I can't open any administration/management Windows application such as:
    Command Prompt
    Computer Management
    Any application located in Administrative Tools
    A popup called "Restrictions" appears with the message "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator". I am the system administrator and I've
    no clue about this issue!
    Besides, there's no "Run..." option in the Start Menu and you
    can't access to any network path (i.e \\IP_Address) from Windows Explorer: you receive the error message "Accessing to the resource '\\IP_Address' has been disallowed".
    Prior To The Problem:
    I did the following actions:
    Managed some AD users, groups and OU by moving, editing or deleting.
    Managed some shared folders on D drive by deleting the folder or changing some Security rights.
    I HAVEN'T TOUCHED ANYTHING RELATED TO GPO!
    Prior to these actions, everything was fine and I never received these error messages.
    What I Did So Far:
    The only thing I did is that I reset the settings of Internet Explorer in the Advanced tab and restarted the server. Unfortunately, it didn't change anything. I didn't know what to do else and I can't seem to find a similar situation as mine. Surely, there
    are many posts related to this error message, but none of them implies the denial of access to every administrative Windows application with the Administrator account.
    Therefore, I'm really seeking the help of the community to tackle this weird and annoying issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    Even if you do changes in Internet explorer settings it does not give any login/access problems in a server.
    Since it is a DC local administrator account won't be available unless and otherwise you enable option "Logon locally" So use domain admin account for accessing DC resources like CMD prompt, AD tools.
    "Run" is hidden in Windows server 2008 , you have to search in
    start or Use Win Key+R.
    So, check above two steps and access UNC paths 
    Regards, Ravikumar P

  • 'The operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer' prompts when firefox is started.

    When I tried to open Firefox, it displayed a pop-up saying that 'The operation has been canceled due to the restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact system administrator'. Even if I logged in as system administrator and tried to start Firefox, it showed me the same pop-up. The problem started from today morning. Yesterday, I was using Firefox and it worked for me. But for quite few days even though if I closed the window it was still running. Next time if I need to start Firefox, I need to close it from the Task manager and then need to start it. Not sure how to fix this problem. Now, I uninstall ed the older version (3.5.0 not sure) and updated with 3.6.3. Then also it shows me the same pop-up.
    == This happened ==
    Not sure how often
    == Yesterday (04-May-2010)

    By googling this site was found:
    [http://techsalsa.com/solution-to-this-operation-has-been-cancelled-due-to-restrictions-in-effect-on-this-computer/]
    You can try following solutions and see which one fix it for you.
    Solution 1:
    • Go to Control Panel -> Add Remove Programs, click on Set Program Access and Defaults.
    • Open up the configuration whichever is selected and change the default web browser to something else.
    Solution 2:
    If you use older versions of IE then upgrade it to the latest one.
    Solution 3:
    Open registry editor, find
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Classes\htmlfile\shell\open\command
    change its value to
    "C:\\Program Files\\Internet Explorer\\IEXPLORE.EXE" -nohome
    Solution 4:
    • Open registry editor and search (Ctrl + F) for the value nocontrolpanel.
    • Change its value from 1 to 0.
    Do mention the solution that worked for you.

  • Firefox (latest and greatest) has been giving me synaptics scroll wheel errors. It has worked fine up until 3 days ago. I have the latest driver for the touch-pad, from synaptics, for my toshiba laptop L505D-S5986. Operating system is Windows 7 (32-Bit).

    Firefox (latest and greatest) has been giving me synaptics scroll wheel errors. It has worked fine up until 3 days ago. I have the latest driver for the touch-pad, from synaptics, for my toshiba laptop L505D-S5986. Operating system is Windows 7 (32-Bit). Have tried it on other browsers, and works as it should. The last add-on i installed for Firefox was "Fox Filter" so my kids couldn't accidentally stumble onto sites of immoral tastes. I can't see why that would have any effect, but it was the last update/add-on i installed to the browser, but even then,.......it was working fine for a week and a half afterwards until now. Please help.
    == This happened ==
    A few times a week
    == A week and a half after i installed Fox Filter. ==
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.1.249.1064 Safari/532.5

    Hello Steve.
    You may be having a problem with some extension or plugin that is hindering your Firefox's normal behavior. Have you tried disabling all add-ons (just to check), to see if Firefox goes back to normal?
    If you detect a faulty add-on, you should contact its author for support. You can also search for alternatives. Site filters are relatively common in the add-ons gallery: [http://addons.mozilla.org addons.mozilla.org].

  • After installing the safari update for windows outlook is not opening email links. I have set safari as my default browser but hyperlinks won't open a browser window - I get an error message - "This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effec

    After installing the safari update for windows, outlook is now not opening email hyperlinks.  I have set safari to be my default browser but outlook won't open it when I click a link.  I get the following message: "This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator."  Please help.

    Hi mcclausky, you may need to manually remove a policy setting from the registry. You also should scan for malware that might have created this problem.
    This article lists scanning and cleaning tools other Firefox users have found helpful: [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]].
    To check your Windows registry for policy settings that might affect Firefox or other programs, I suggest consulting a Windows forum or Microsoft's forums. For example:
    * http://windowssecrets.com/forums/
    * [http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_8-system/this-operation-has-been-cancelled-due-to/9677848e-072d-4206-87f4-9da9284d6151 This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator. - Microsoft Community]
    * [http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-security/restrictions-this-operation-has-been-cancelled-due/8af1d0cd-8fbd-4223-9396-86d7497bb275 Restrictions. This operation has been cancelled due to to restrictions in effect on this computer.Please contact your system administrator. - Microsoft Community]

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem with VPN client on Cisco 1801

    Hi, I have configured a new router for a customer. All works fine but i have a strange issue with the VPN client. When i start the VPN the client don't close the connection, ask for password, start to negotiate security policy the show the not connec

  • How to increase page size for balance file upload in Workspace.

    Hi All, Please suggest how to increase page size for balance file upload in shared Workspace pages. Thanks,

  • Cannot Launch Photoshop CS5 - "Could not Open a Scratch File..."

    Hi, so photoshop CS5 is not launching. Just got it in the mail, installed it, and now I'm getting this message: "Could not open a scratch file because the file is locked or you do not have the necessary privileges. Use the get info command in finder

  • HELP! 20" Cinema orig. Apple product pictures needed

    Unfortunately this is not a joke. I have sold my former 20" Cinema Display on Ebay. I used what i believed to be original Apple product pictures of the Cinema Display in my Ebay auction. 2 months later - a few days ago - i received a registered mail

  • Flash player does not run with Safari 5.0.4

    Hi Friends: Two days ago, I installed an upgrade of Safari to 5.0.4 (6533.20.27); since this upgrade, any web page that use flash player is not working, instead of the images appears a message "module not found" and in web pages like Facebook or Yout