ECC6.0 upgrade issue with IDoc release

Hi experts,
we are in the process of upgrading our ECC environment from 5.0 to 6.0. We have quite a few interfaces which use ORDERS/Invoice Idocs in customised form. In ECC5.0 environment, we had developed a Z segment in the ORDERS Idoc and the segment release was set as 640. Everything worked fine in ECC5.0.
In upgraded environment, SAP has released new version of some segments. one of those is E1EDP01. This segment has 2 new versions in ECC6.0 environment - 007 and 008. This change in the version changes the data in the IDoc and hence interface goes in error at the EDI provider.
We have tried to use 640 as the IDoc segment release in the partner profile of the IDocs. This still gives us an issue because the 007 version of the segment E1EDP01 has release 620 and hence the Idoc picks up 007 version instead of 006 version as desired. When we change the partner profile with Segment release in the IDoc type as 46C, it gives us an issue in the Z segment saying that the IDoc segment is not released in 46C and the Idoc goes in error.
has any one faces such situation in the past? if yes, please throw some light.
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
Iam new to SAP. Thars why i cant understand well to do upgrade,
Then i found out some notes from internet about Upgrade : SAP Note Number 857904 (upgrade from Release 6. To 7.0).
In that notes,
Actually i would like to know about some key words (for example : ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER. ) which how to work in the Release 7.0
Always i have some objets in 4.6C.
Ex 01: READ DATASET p_dataset INTO wa_record
Ex 02 : TRANSFER i_crhu TO p_crhd
LOOP AT i_crhd.
*disable controls in crhd
    PERFORM f_disable_crhd.
    TRANSFER i_crhd TO p_crhd.
    IF sy-subrc NE 0.
      MESSAGE a045.        "Error when transfering data to error file
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
CLEAR i_crhd.
CLOSE DATASET p_crhd.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    MESSAGE a039.                      "Error at close dataset
ENDIF.
OPEN DATASET v_crhd FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE.
And then i have some FM (ex : WS_UPLOAD , WS_DOWNLOAD)
So I have changed the code for WS_UPLOAD by GUI_UPLOAD
                              and WS_DOWNLOAD by GUI_DOWNLOAD
now my problem is to know about some key word which how to work in ECC6 (for example ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER. )
thanks in advance
Rathy

Similar Messages

ECC6 EHP5 issue with authorisations now need access to S_DEVELOP

Hi
We have ECC6 and have just upgraded to EHP5 and have found that many HR reports/transactions now need access to S_DEVELOP authorisation object. This has caused issues with our user roles. Has anyone else experienced this issue?
Many thanks
Julie

Hi Julie,
Please implement SAP note : 1487329 "Additional Authorization Check in ABAP Workbench" that should solve your issue. There is also note 1617448 "WD ABAP Team Calendar needs S_DEVELOP authorization to load". Hope it helps,
Kind Regards
Christine

Issue with PO Release strategy

Hi experts,
I have problem with Po release strategy in 5 to 10 purchase orders, i have created few purchase orders(2000 Po's) with same document type and company code ..etc and saved, then release strategy has been triggered.
For few purhcase orders release strategy has not been triggered.
If i take 1 po from that few purchase orders(Release strategy has not triggered) as reference and again if i create PO,new purchase order have getting created with release strategy.
Can some body tel how this ican be possible, hope this might be standard syatem behaviour.
Hope i should delete thos e purchase orders and i should create new PO's instead of of old PO's (Without release strategy).
Some experts can share their experiance in this regard.
And how i should proceed further with this issue.??
Thanks

Hi,
You issue in your system has 2000Nou2019s purchase orders with release strategy has been triggered but 5 to 10 purchase orders do have release strategy.
& when you are creating a new PO with reference to old purchase orders (which release strategy has not triggered) and on saving NEW PO created with triggering release strategy.
Cause for above:
PO which release strategy does not trigger because the purchase orders are created before setting release strategy for PO. Those PO triggered release strategy and all are created after setting release strategy for PO.
Action:
Its completely business call for business users to go for options:
Option-- >1# You can use same old PO which release strategy does not triggered, do GR and all other process
Option-- >2# You can create new PO with reference old PO which release strategy does not triggered and upon saving you will have new PO number with release strategy triggered, then release PO & do GR and other related process.
Regards,
Biju K

Issue with PO release (multi level approval)

Hi,
Need help regarding PO release. I am working with 4 level approval process.
Information:
it is sequential release as I can see in workflow log, a new workflow gets generated for next level only after previous level executes the workitem.
Facing following issue at 2nd Level :
Level 2 releases item and it goes to Level 3, but workitem doesnt disappear from inbox.Once Level 3 releases item, an acceptance mail goes to Level 2. But along with the mail, updated workitem (i.e. showing release by 3rd level) also appears in inbox of Level2. Now two work items appear in Level2 Inbox.
In Workflow Log, this is how its behaving:
WORKFLOW STARTED-->
1st WF appears in WF log.
Level 1 releases WI ->
2nd workflow appears in WF log +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 2 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 3 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 3 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2 and Level3) along with the mail.
Level 4 releases WI ->
4th WF appears +
3rd WF appears (in process status) +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (STATUS COMPLETED)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 4 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2, Level3 and Level 4) along with the mail.
Result:
PO gets released.
In workflow log 2nd, 3rd and 4th workflow appear with IN PROCESS STATUS. All of them show process stopped at LEVEL2.

Hi Kjetil,
Release strategy is being used. Configuration for release strategy is given as following.
RGroup Rcode   Workflow     Agent
Z6          R1         1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Release is sequential.
For column 'Agent' mentioning position or User is not really useful because we are getting agents through Z table. Reason is: current org structure supports 1 position with multiple users from same department. In our scenario we need to find initiators department then find relevant approval levels for that departemnt. So I cannot mention any position in 'Agent' Column as release code will be locked against one position and one departetment.
Agents picked through Z table. Table has fields Agent/ UserID , level, department.
Logic to pick agents( Object and method created ):
When workflow starts, it finds department of the initiator.
For that department-> find approval levels available(L1, L2, L3).
For these levels -> Find Agent mentioned for that level.
Onece Agents are found for all levels -> Pass them to WF container.
In task activity, These agents are passed back to the rule and the task comes to know which agent it should go to.
Result : Four workflows start in sequence. When last level releases, only 1st workflow shows COMPLETED status. Rest three hang at level 2. If I see Me29N , release for that item is shown completed. To me it seems triggering of only first workflow is enough for release. Is there any way I can avoid trigerring of other three workflows?
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:30 AM
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:31 AM

7.1.2 Upgrade Issue with 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe

I upgraded my iPhone 5 to iOS 7.1.2 and now it will not work with my 2012 Tahoe via USB connection. Vehicle has Bose system with navigation. Previously the display worked with Spotify and any music apps on the phone. Phone has been rebooted mutiple times. Vehicle has also been turned off and on.
The strange thing is I also updated to 7.1.2 on my iPad Mini (non retina) and it connects and works as it should.

Hey ylwdogsc,
I have an article that may help you address this issue and contains some helpful troubleshooting tips for this type of issue:
iOS: Troubleshooting car stereo connections
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3581
Troubleshooting tips
Beginning playback and controlling music
Some car stereos may require that playback be started or controlled from either the device or the stereo. Ensure that your car stereo is set to the proper input for your device. If it is and you cannot hear sound from your car speakers, try switching to your radio and then back to the proper input.
When using adapters to connect to your car stereo, you may notice variations in audio quality. When possible, use a shorter connection to the car stereo or try a different cable or adapter.
Disconnect and restart
If you are experiencing difficulties with the connection between your stereo and device, disconnect the device, and then power cycle the stereo and your iPhone, iPod touch, or iPad. When the Home screen reappears, reconnect your device. If you cannot power cycle the stereo, turn the car off and then back on to allow the stereo to power off.
Isolate the issue
Try to reproduce the issue with an identical or similar accessory, if one is available, or test with a second device.
Example: If you hear static coming from the left audio channel, try connecting a different device or try connecting to a different stereo or accessory that connects over the same interface (30-pin or Lightning connector, Bluetooth, or headphone jack).
Restore iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch
If you have isolated an issue to the device, restore iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch to its factory condition. You should rarely need to use this step with an accessory issue. If the issue affects only a third-party accessory, contact the accessory manufacturer before restoring your iOS device.
If the device does not update successfully, the issue may lie with the device and not with the accessory. See one of the following articles, depending on your device:
iPhone
iPad
iPod touch
Take care, and thanks for visiting the Apple Support Communities.
Cheers,
Braden

Issue with IDOC occurence and SeeBurger message mapping

Hey Guys
While developing a EDI 850 to IDOC scenario i came across this issue with pre-delivered Seeburger mapping(A_850_V4010_to_I_ORDERS05).
I actually need to post multiple IDOC's to SAP system in the same message so i changed the IDOC occurence to unbounded and re-imported that as a .XSD file in Integration repository.
Earlier the pre-delivered message mappings provided by SeeBurger(under SEEBURGER_HIGH-TECH, 1.7.1 of seeburger) was working fine for me since i was posting only 1 IDOC but now the mapping is failing as the IDOC occurence has changed(unbounded).
Is there a way we can do some settings on SeeBurger server or Bic so that we can use the pre-delivered mapping for Multiple IDOC's as well?
I just want to make sure before i start off with doing whole of the mapping manually.
Thanx
Aamir

Thanx for the input guys
@Deepthi.
Doing whole of mapping manualy is definitely the last option but i m looking for ways to re-use the pre-delivered SeeBurger mapping.
>>Seeburger Mapping is only just to convert XML to EDI and EDI to XML.
Bic mapping designer does this,i m dealing with message mapping of XI(convert source to target) not Bic designer right now,and Bic does more than just XML to EDI and vice versa,it handles other industry standards too.
@Jens
>>The XI message mappings from Seeburger in the Industry solutions are mapping templates
Yeah,but the mapping template i have deals with 850 to ORDERS05,when i change IDOC occurence and re-import it back in Integration repository,it doesn't stays as ORDERS05,it has to be changed to user defined message interface(in my case MI_ORDERS05) so i m unable to use 850 to ORDERS05 template.
@Seshagiri
>>Open the Seeburger SWCV From the IR--goto External Def---Select the right one and copy it and paste it in notepad.
Changing the occurence is not an issue,i want to re-use the pre-delivered mapping in Integration repository,which is not working.
Looks like i need to do it manually
Thanx
Aamir

Could not trace the issue with IDOC to file

Hi All,
We are facing issue with missing idoc data in the file, There were 20 idocs got generated (msg type - PAYEXT) from the payment run but only 15 of them written to the file, in the Outbound partner profiles we are using file port to create file. Noticed that all idocs were showing the same status (03) and The IDoc was written to file & file location.
When we checked the file and found that 5 idocs data was not written to the file, but surpricingly status was showing that it was written to file. Can any one give clue / similar experience ... on this. Not sure how to track the issue ... i checked SMQ1, but nothing was locked.
Thanks
Satya

Hi Kumar,
As Jose mentioned please check the occurrence of the 6th file. It should be 0..unbounded. Also if you do this it will pass the mapping but you will get the error for the 6th file in sxmb_moni, because it would be an empty root message only. This is a known issue and I dont think we have a solution for this. But one workaround would be to create a custom mapping exception so that you have that exception in sxmb_moni when the message fails and if you have alerts then you will have this mapping exception in your alert.
Regards,
---Satish

Posting Data Issue with IDOC Type : COND_A03

Friends,
I'm posting the data from Middleware(Message Broker) to SAP using the IDOC Type : COND_A03 with Message Type : COND_A.
For this IDOC,I'm populating the below Segment's data.
Segement :E1KOMG:
Fields:
KVEWE,KOTABNR,KAPPL ,KSCHL,VAKEY ,KONDA,MATNR .
Segement :E1KONH:
Fields:
KNUMH,DATAB,DATBI
Segement :E1KONP:
Fields:
KSCHL,STFKZ,KSTBM,KSTBW,KRECH ,KBETR,KONWA,KPEIN,KUMZA,KUMNE,MXWRT,GKWRT,ZAEHK_IND ,KBRUE,VALTG,
VALDT,ANZAUF,MIKBAS,MXKBAS,KOMXWRT,KLF_STG,KLF_KAL
Problem: In SAP, IDOC's are processing successfully with status 53 and updating the tables : KONH,KONP successfully.
But Table A957 which is passing against KOTABNR field is not pupulating with the Materials passing.
Can anyone please guide me why the Materials are not populating in the table : A957.
Regards,
Sreeram

Hi,
I guess there might be some issue with VAKEY population.
All the key fields in A957 should be concated properly while populating VAKEY. (Leading zeros must be prefixed to the material)
Regards,
Ganga

Lion Upgrade - issue with WiFi Network

I recently upgraded to Lion and now everytime I restart my wireless network (Time Capsule) is not recongized and I must manually select it. I have the same issue with my magic mouse, although it does reconginze my bluetooth keyboard. What can I do to fix the issue?

Yes, same WiFi problem with safe mode. Everything was perfect until the upgrade to Lollipop. Now WiFi speed is 1/10 of before, and phone is slow in general. realy sad, sometimes even whatsapp messages takes minutes to be delivered.
Does anyone know how to select only 5ghz channel for the WiFi on the phone?

Issue with retriggering Release Strategy

Hi all,
We have a one off situation here. We had already 10 release staragies in our system. We added 2 more release strategies with a new characteristic. We updated the characteristic value only for the new 2 release strategues and did not update the rest 10. Although now we had updated the characteristic value for remaiining strategies, the purchase documents created in the mean tme is not subjected to release strategy. To ensure business control we need to retrigger back the release strategy for almost 1000's of documents.
As any change to purcahsing document will retrigger it when done manually, but given the number of documents and as per Note 493900 we cannot trigger it by any backgoriund job to modify as below:
16. Question :
Why is there no release strategy determination when a program changes in
background a purchasing document which corresponds to the classification of
a release strategy ?
Answer :
This is the system design that a release strategy determination can only be
triggered through a user action and not by changes made in background
process.
If you create a document (e.g. PO, Contract, etc), the determination of the
release strategy takes place only in case of a user event like checking or
saving the document.
Kindly suggest any best practise to retrigger release strategy for the missing documents to ensure business control. Any easy and time savig measure to get it resolved will be appreciated.
Regards,
Anand Sampath

Hi Arnand,
After investigation by searching customer messages database ,I found
other customer has similar problem as the release strategy has changed
after creation of the SES please review the explanation from developer
:(whose release code is 03 )
When you try to revoke the acceptance of the service entry sheets
in ML81N or ML81, the 'Enter release code' pop up window appears, but
entering the code that is determined via the menu path Goto -> Entry
Sheet -> Release Strategy (which is the 03), the SES remains the same.
Nothing changes. The status does not vary and no error or warning
message is issued.
Checking the customizing for the release strategy, the release code
03 should have never been assigned to the SES 800024272 as the values
for the relevant characteristics were not included under that code.
I do not know how it was managed to accept the SES.
Now, when you try to revoke it, it seems that no release
strategy can be determined, not even including the values RCARESANO
and 012 between the valid values for the characteristics of the release
code 03 (RCARESANO as valid value for SUPERVISOR_SERVICIOS
(CESSR-ERNAM)and 012 as valid value for GRUPO_COMPRAS (CESSR-EKGRP)).
The only Possibility is to change now the SES so that the release
strategy can be re-determined by the system.This is the Only possible
way that the system can redetermine the Release Strategy , but it will
not be possible to do so as the SES is already accepted with the Old
strategy and it does not admit any further changes.
To be able to change it you would need to revoke the SES first,
but this Will also not be possible as the Release Strategy was changed
and the system still applies the old rules for determining the Release.
Solution to our Problem
The Only way to revoke the SES is to Restore back the Old Strategy that
was prior to 03 in the customizing.So now what will happen is that by
applying the Old Rules the System will be able to revoke the SES that#s
using the Old one. Once the necessary SES are revoked then go back to
customizing and apply the new strategy as it was did now, and
Change the SES and save , the new value of the Release Strategy will get
updated in the table ESSR and the field frgsx will now have 03.
Problems associated if the Release strategy is changed
Actually the release strategy is not supposed to be changed when there
are some documents in the System that uses it and even if you change the
Strategy the Old records will not get AUTOMATICALLY UPDATED by the
system.The Release Strategy routine has to run again to update the
values. This is Possible by changing the document SES ,
This change will happen only if the SES is not accepted and if its
accepted then you need to revoke and to revoke you need to restore the
old strategy , revoke and then change the SES , and have to go back to
customizing and Start using the New strategy from now on by doing so the
Routine will update the old record with the new strategy.
b) You may want to use CEKKO-BADAT(Requisition Date) or any other
structure in CEBAN or CEKKO and create a new release strategy
to differentiate the old release strategy.
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

Upgrade : Issue with Specical character being used in 4.6C ( Dynamic calls)

Hi ,
We are working on Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6.0 . in SPAU phase we are facing an issue :
When we are trying to see the variants from the program, it says that the program contains Syntax Error
"In Unicode programs, the "&" character can not appear in names as it does here in the name 'op&xv0' "
The 'op&xv0' is a form. we tried changing the form name, but couldnt get the PERFORM stmt for the form and it might be a dynamic call. what can we do for this type of programs?
Please also suggest how we can identify the places where that particular Subroutine is being called.
Thanks & Regds
Teja

This is probably an operation defined in Tcode PE04. You can change the operation subroutine name and then modify the code accordingly in the report.
Go to PE04 and put in operation name, suposedly &xv0.
Instead of using standard name suggested by SAP use custom name (for example opYvx0) and then change in the report as well and it should be ok.

Using Thunderbird/Firefox - since last upgrade, issues with HTML emails and opening PDF

Since last upgrade, it seems that I'm having 2 (maybe 3) problems:
1) emails have white/grey horizontal lines in the bottom half of the email's text or graphics
2) can't open pdf files - when I could without issue before upgrade
3) Adobe Reader - I've downloaded updates, but they won't install. (says not compatible with my computer, but running Mac OSX 10.6.8 (I even downloaded Opera brower to see if that would work, but there still seem to be Adobe issues)
Any thoughts?

mknabster wrote:
Now i'm thinking it has to be those 10K fonts I put on there into the Font app.
I think you are correct, that was not a good idea.
Hopefully they all wound up in Home/Library/Fonts. You can safely delete everything in there, as OS X does not put anything in that folder. Fonts part of the OS are
http://www.prepressure.com/fonts/basics/snow-leopard-fonts/list

Upgrade issue with sapadm_password

hi gurus
We're having our own hana sandbox which we need to upgrade , but during the upgrade procedure from Sp06 to Sp07 we've faced few unfortunate issues and upgrade fails all the time. Here is the steps:
1. running Sp06 and downloaded Sp07
2. Execute ./hdblcmgui and fill in all credentials
3. When system comes to Updating SAP HANA database the following error is being thrown (see attachment)
Did not manage to find any flat file where i can put this username.
In log file the following info is being written:
17:12:23.984 - INFO:
Program terminated with exit code 1
17:12:23.984 - ERR :
Update of SAP HANA Database failed
17:12:23.984 - INFO:
17:12:23.984 - INFO:
END: Updating SAP HANA Database start: 17:12:22.346 duration: 00:00:01.638
17:12:23.984 - INFO:
17:12:23.985 - INFO:   ---------------------------------------------------------
17:12:23.985 - INFO:   END: Update components start: 17:12:22.111 duration: 00:00:01.874
17:12:23.985 - INFO:   ---------------------------------------------------------
17:12:23.986 - ERR :   Installation failed
17:16:47.494 - INFO:   Summary of critical errors
17:12:23.986 - ERR :
Installation failed
17:12:23.984 - ERR :
Update of SAP HANA Database failed
17:12:23.984 - INFO:
Upgrade failed
17:12:23.984 - INFO:
No password tag 'sapadm_password' found

Solved

Upgrade issue with VPN3015

Hi,
I'm currently trying to upgrade our cisco vpn3000 to the latest software using the web console and it continually fails with the error :
Software Update Error
An error occured while updating the image, VPN 3000 Concentrator has not been successfully updated. The current executable image has not been affected.
The image i'm currently running is :
vpn3000-4.7.2.K-k9.bin
and i've tried upgrading to :
vpn3000-4.7.2.O-k9.bin
vpn3000-4.7.2.L-k9.bin
vpn3000-4.7.2.N-k9.bin
File manager shows :
Total: 12344KB, Used: 2404KB, Free: 9940K
so I should have enough space for the image.
Does anyone have any idea how to fix this?
Under IE7/8 it seems to fail instantly. In firefox 2 it gets to about 96% before failing.
thanks,
Matt

Make sure that you are not loadingthe 3005 image on 3015. there is a memory requirement. The memory requirement for this software image4.7.2, is at least 128MB
For more details, please the link below for the release notes of 4.7.2 image:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn3000/vpn3000_47/Release_Notes/472con3k.html

Upgrade issue with 7.0.98.0

Hi,
I recently upgraded our Cisco 4402 & 4404 controllers from 6.0.188.0 to 7.0.98.0 and everything went fine until 24hrs later all the access points disassociated and would not re-connect.
The AP's sit with a single fast flashing green light. We are running a combination of 1131AG and 1241's.
Has anyone else seen this issue? It seems like it could be DHCP related as the leases are 24hrs.
Matt Pollard
University of Abertay

Matt,
Something odd to check, can you console into one of the AP's and reboot it and see log the output? You'd want to be looking for a reference to mesh_cfg.. You can also see if it's actually trying to connect, if all else fails can you possibly take one of them and convert it to IOS and look at the flash directory and provide a directory list of it..
I had a very similar issue.and it turns out that somehow the AP's thought they were mesh...
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Kayle

ECC6.0 upgrade issue with IDoc release

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for