Enabling macros for a "full acces permission" mailbox

I have a few users that have full access permissions to other mailboxes.  Consequently, these mailboxes appear in there personal mailbox profile.  The problem I am having is there are forms in the additional mailboxes that contain macros. 
These macros will not run from within the additional mailbox in the user's profile, but they will run from the users own mailbox.  If the user opens a separate profile created for the "other" mailbox, the macros will run.  How can I enable
macros so they will run from within one of the "other" mailboxes to which the user has "full access permissions"?
I am running Outlook 2010 and Exchange 2010 SP2.
Thanks,
Muskie
Muskie

I mean you can setup multiple exchange acount in outlook 2010/2013
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/deva/archive/2010/04/12/outlook-2010-how-to-configure-multiple-exchange-accounts-to-a-profile.aspx
Clarification on Outlook 2010/2013 and Additional Exchange Account supportability
http://blogs.technet.com/b/outlooking/archive/2012/12/24/clarification-on-outlook-2010-and-additional-exchange-account-supportability.aspx
Cheers,
Tony Chen
Forum Support
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
If you have any feedback on our support, please contact
[email protected]

Similar Messages

  • Enable macros in word for mac?

    I've been trying to open a form for school which is a word template and requires "enabling macros", but I can't figure out where to do that in my new macbook - any help greatly appreciated.

    Narfaz wrote:
    Is there an add-on, download, or work-around that will enable me to create macros in MS Word for Mac 2008, please?
    If there is such a thing, the place to ask about it is probably
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac/forum/macword
    instead of here.

  • CmdLet to list all mailboxes on which an account has full access permission

    Hi, there
    Just wondering what cmdLet can list all mailboxes on which a specific account has full access permission,
    thanks

    This should help you...
    Get-Mailbox -ResultSize Unlimited | Get-MailboxPermission | where { ($_.AccessRights -eq "FullAccess") -and ($_.User -like "*SpecificUserAccount*") }
    Amit Tank
    MVP: Exchange Server | MCTS: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010, Configuration
    MCITP: EMA | MCSA: M | Blog: http://ExchangeShare.WordPress.com

  • I am a new Mac owner. I downloaded a document off of Sharepoint but I cannot input data into it.I have Office Mac2011 and I did enable Macros.Thank you for your help.

    I am a new MacBook Pro owner. I have Microsoft Office: Mac2011 I downloaded a document from Sharepoint. I clicked on the document to open it.....I then clicked on Enable Macro and the document opens, but will not allow me to input data. Thank for any help.

    Hey TobynJ:
    Sharepoint will use your network username or password if it is setup that way, but I'm not talking talking about that.  I am talking about permissions to be able to write to the document, you might only have read rights and not write.

  • How to give full access to mailbox to users in trusted domain?

    Hi,
    I am working on a migration-project where we migrate all users from one domain to a new domain. I have Exchange in both domains, and migrates mailoboxes from the old to the new domain. In the old domain I have a number of mailboxes that are used for common
    calendars for the departments. My problem is: How can I give the users who has been  migrated to the new domain full access to the existing calendar-mailboxex in the old domain? I have given the accounts in the new domain full access to the mailboxes
    in the old domain by using to following command: get-mailbox mailboxname | add-mailboxpermission -accessrights FullAccess,ExternalAccount -user newdomain\username
    After the command has completed I can see the account listed in the "Manage Full Access Permission"-dialog, but still the new useraccount cannot create appointments etc in the original calendar from Outlook.
    Any tips on this?
    Thor-Egil

    Hi Thor,
    Thank you for your question.
    Did the issue occur when we use OWA?
    Are there any errors when they cannot create appointments?
    We could enable “Support cross forest delegation” on FIM(Forefront Identity Manager) to check if the issue persist.
    There is an article for us to how to enable “Support cross forest delegation” by the following link:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/neiljohn/archive/2011/10/12/exchange-server-2010-cross-forest-delegation.aspx  
    If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know. 
    Best Regard,
    Jim
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Jim Xu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Add-MailboxPermission for multiple users on multiple mailboxes

    I have a need to grant a large number of users full access to an equally large number of mailboxes. I've previously been able to do this easily in the management shell where I have multiple users for one mailbox (or vice-versa; one user for multiple mailboxes)
    by using one of the following 2 commands:
    get-content c:\xxxx.txt | foreach { Add-MailboxPermission $_ -User user.name -AccessRights FullAccess}
    or
    get-content c:\xxxx.txt | foreach { Add-MailboxPermission examplemailbox -User $_ -AccessRights FullAccess}
    This works fine for when there are only multiple entries on one side of the equation, but using this method, I would need to run the command multiple times to get all of the accesses set up as requested. So I've been looking to see if there is a way of writing
    one command that could achieve it all in one go.
    What I've been looking at doing is creating a .csv file, filled as such;
    name,mail
    user.name1,mailbox1
    user.name2,mailbox2
    And then writing a shell command like the below:
    import-csv c:\xxxx.csv | foreach { Add-MailboxPermission $_.mail -User $_.name -AccessRights FullAccess}
    Will this achieve the result that I'm aiming for? or is it going to be easier to just go with the more time-consuming method of just having the multiple entries on one side of the equation?

    Hi,
    I have a test in my environment, you can use the following cmdlet to grant multiple users full access to multiple mailboxes.
    Import-csv c:\test1.csv | foreach { Add-MailboxPermission $_.mail -User $_.name -AccessRights FullAccess}
    For example, if I want to grant amy02, amy03 full access permission to amy01; grant amy01, amy02 full access permission to amy03, the test1.csv file should be:
    Hope this can be helpful to you.
    Best regards,
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange Admin without the right to assign / revoke the Full Access Permission

    Hello,
    I would like to create Exchange Administrator who can do all mail box related administration except assign/revoke Full Access Permission and Send As Permission to other users' mail box or hims own mail box.
    Exchange: MS Exchange 2007
    OS: Windows 2008

    You would have to regularly update his rights on the mailboxes - you can't grant the rights to the distribution group and have them apply to the mailboxes it contains.  This means that when someone moves from his department, you would need to immediately
    have to remove his rights from that mailbox, since just basing his rights on mailboxes in the group would add more members, but never remove him from existing ones.
    For instance, in your list above, Bill manages John, Paul, Jim, and Harry.  Suppose Harry moves from Bill's department, and Dave joins it.  If you just go by group membership, Dave would get added, but there's no easy way to see that Harry is no
    longer in the department.  You would either have to mark this in the notes of the group ("Harry left 3/16/2015'), or you would have to immediately remove Harry from the group.  Consider if Harry was promoted to Bill's level - he wouldn't want
    Bill to have rights on his mailbox just because he had them when he was Bill's direct report.
    As for a script you can run each week to add the mailbox rights, that's pretty simple.  You'd use
    Get-Group <group alias> | % { $_.Members } to get the list of group members, and you'd use
    Add-MailboxPermission $ChkMbx -User $_.Alias -AccessRights FullAccess
    to add the full mailbox access rights.  The following would be a good starting point:
    Get-Group <group alias> | % { $_.Members } | % {
        Add-MailboxPermission $_.DistinguishedName -User <manager alias> -AccessRights FullAccess
    I'll caveat this response - I have Exchange 2010 and don't have an Exchange 2007 system to check the commands or their syntax with.  Your mileage may vary.

  • User with Full Access to mailbox cannot view calendar

    I have a user who one of several users that manages the schedules for several conference rooms using regular mailboxes on Exchange Server 2007.  She (and she alone), has lost the right to manage the mailbox calendar.  When she tries to access the
    calendar she gets the error message, "You do not have permission to view this calendar".
    I verified her rights as Full Access and even ran the cmdlet below which says, "Appropriate ACE is already present on object ".
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>Add-MailboxPermission -Identity "mailbox" -User user -AccessRights FullAccess -InheritanceType All
    WARNING: Appropriate ACE is already present on object "CN=mailbox
    49,OU=Service Accounts,OU=  xxx,OU=xxxxx),OU=xxx,DC=xxx,DC=xx,DC=xxx" for
     account "user".
    Identity             User                 AccessRights        IsInherited Deny
    Domaim      domain\user       {FullAccess}        False       False
    When I get the permissions on the mailbox she has the following:
    AccessRights    : {FullAccess}
    Deny            : False
    InheritanceType : All
    User            : domain\user
    Identity        : domain/OU/OU/OU/mailbox
    IsInherited     : False
    IsValid         : True
    ObjectState     : Unchanged
    Any help out there?
    [email protected]

    Hi,
    According to your post, the permission seems to be configured properly in your Exchange server. This user has full access permission to Domaim’s mailbox.
    Please try to open shared mailbox in OWA to check whether she can access the calendar. In Outlook, we can open shared calendar in Calendar panel by clicking Open Calendar > Open shared calendar. If it fails, please try the following steps:
    1. Click File > Account Settings > Change > More Settings > Advanced.
    2. Add the Shared mailbox that you want to open and click OK.
    If there is any updates, please feel free to let us know.
    Best Regards,
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • PowerPivot: MidTier process account should have 'Full Read' permission on all associated SPWebApplications.

    First time install of SharePoint 2013 (with SQL Server 2014) and Health Analyzer continuously shows the error in subject line.  Note that I've 'Reanalyzed' the error and attempted to 'Repair Automatically' but no luck.  I've followed the instructions
    on related threads for this issue but to no avail.
    Verified that the service account used by the App Pool has Full Read access on the web site as below.
    First verified what App Pool is being used by the PowerPivot application:
    Then verified what domain account is used as the service identity for the App Pool (under Service Accounts, but I can only upload 2 images per post).  The Service Account for the SharePoint Web Services System is <mydomain>\SPServices
    Then checked that the domain account has Full Read on the web site
    Any help of ways I can additionally troubleshoot would be greatly appreciated...

    Hi Dinesh,
    Please use another domain account for PowerPivot Service Application instead of SP_farm, then grant full read permission to the content web applications associated to this service application through User Policy, then run the rule and check result again.
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsapps/en-US/e864c2ff-19ce-439a-a11f-935c6b7240a4/powerpivot-midtier-process-account-should-have-full-read-permission-on-all-associated?forum=sharepointadmin (Rajat's
    suggestion)
    http://whitepages.unlimitedviz.com/2012/06/the-health-analyzer-and-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/
    Thanks,
    Daniel Yang
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you
    have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support

  • There is no iView available for system "SAP_SRM": object "Permission".

    Hi All,
    We have portal ( SAP 7.01 SP3 patch level 3) as the front end for SRM 7.0 ,We have integrated SRM with portal through the system alias SAP_SRM.
    When RFx Approver click on u201Cpermissionu201D button in u201CPurchasingu201D -> u201CSourcingu201D-> u201CRFx Numberu201D-> u201CDisplay RFxu201D he is able to see the permission iView where he can assign technical evaluators. But when same Approver click on u201CPermissionu201D button in  u201CStrategic Purchasingu201D ->u201DWork Overviewu201D in Alert tab or Task tab( Display RFx page )  is throwing the following error:
    "There is no iView available for system "SAP_SRM": object "Permission". For more information, contact your administrator."
    I searched in SDN forum and got few solutions and did as they suggested but my problem not yet solved.
    those are:
    1.     Assign Target iView (Permission iView) in  u201CNavigationu201D folder of respective Role (Strategic Purchase)
    2.     Make sure system Alias name as SRM_SRM.
    3.     Make sure user mapping status should be ok in System Alias Editor.
    4.     Should add u201CEveryoneu201D group in permission editor of System Object and make sure select u201CEnduseru201D check box and u201Cadministratoru201D as Read or full control(I selected Full control).
    5.     Add u201CEveryoneu201D group in permission editor of u201Ccoreu201D folder of SRM7.0 folder.
    6.     Add u201CEveryoneu201D group in permission editor of u201CPermissionu201D business object.
    7.     Check the target iViews in respective Business Object (in my case u201CPermissionu201D).
    8.     I updated latest patches (patch level 9) as said in SAP note: 0001386141
    Anybody knows solution for this problem please let me know. Encourage point will be given to useful postingu2026
    Thanks and Regards
    siva

    Hi Deepti,
    Thank you very much for u r quick reply.
    I didnu2019t create any custom roles for RFx in Portal side and SRM side also; we are using standard roles provided by SAP. I checked all the iViews which are needed for the Role (in this case u201CStrategic Purchaseu201D role) those are existed in u201CNavigationu201D folder. Should I create custom role and have to assign required iViews to that to rectify this problem?
    Thanks and Regards
    siva

  • Full mask permission in SharePoint using Client Side Object Model

    Full mask permission in SharePoint using Client Side Object Model does not include all the base permission while it does have all base permission in server side . Is this a bug ? 
    Or do we have any workaround for this.
    BasePermissions.Set(PermissionKind.FullMask);  is not updating all the permissions. 
    It seems that there is some limitation with Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.dll as mentioend at below link . Do we have any workaround here.
    http://break962.rssing.com/browser.php?indx=7116806&last=1&item=9
    Ashish Baranwal || To know what you know and what you do not know, that is true knowledge

    You can write your own loop to upload multiple files via an individual call.
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/108525/multiple-file-upload-with-metadata-using-rest/108532#108532
    More reference: http://sharepointfieldnotes.blogspot.com/2014/04/uploading-documents-and-setting.html
    Please 'propose as answer' if it helped you, also 'vote helpful' if you like this reply.

  • Script Grant Full Access Permission on Multiple Folders and Sub-Folders

    Hi, I'm having a issue trying to run this script. 
    1.)It provides each folder with "Special" Permission over them. (Read, Write, Modify, Full control). Is there a way of making it "Full Control" Permission instead of special permission?
    or
    2.) Is there a way to make the Object Apply to "This Folder,sub folders and files" (when i change it manually this it changes to Full Control Access)?
    What I tried doing in the following script is removing the inheritance of the folder then applying its level of authentication. I do get some errors and I'm pretty sure it's has to do with some files being password protected.
    $domainG = "Domain\Group"
    $dir = "X:\Folder\Folder\*\SameName"
    $subfolder = Join-Path $dir "\*"
    $subsubfolder = Join-Path $subfolder "\*"
    $subsubsubfolder = Join-Path $subsubfolder "\*"
    $subsubsubsubfolder = Join-Path $subsubsubfolder "\*"
    $acl = Get-Item $dir |get-acl
    #This removes inheritance
    $acl.SetAccessRuleProtection($true,$true)
    $acl |Set-Acl
    # Gives full control
    $rule = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule -ArgumentList @($domainG,"FullControl","Allow")
    $acl.SetAccessRule($rule)
    $acl |Set-Acl
    $acl = Get-Item $subfolder |Get-Acl
    # This adds full control to the subfolder
    $rule = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule -ArgumentList @($domainG,"FullControl","Allow")
    $acl.SetAccessRule($rule)
    $acl |Set-Acl
    $acl = Get-Item $subsubfolder |Get-Acl
    # This adds full control to the sub sub folder
    $rule = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule -ArgumentList @($domainG,"FullControl","Allow")
    $acl.SetAccessRule($rule)
    $acl |Set-Acl
    $acl = Get-Item $subsubsubfolder |Get-Acl
    # This adds full control to the sub sub subfolder
    $rule = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule -ArgumentList @($domainG,"FullControl","Allow")
    $acl.SetAccessRule($rule)
    $acl |Set-Acl
    $acl = Get-Item $subsubsubsubfolder |Get-Acl
    # This adds full control to the sub sub sub subfolder
    $rule = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule -ArgumentList @($domainG,"FullControl","Allow")
    $acl.SetAccessRule($rule)
    $acl |Set-Acl

    The constructor you are using for the FileSystemAccessRule will only apply to the object the ACE belongs to. To have it apply to anything else, you'll have to use the constructor with the following arguments:
    <Principal>, <Rights>, <InheritanceFlags>, <PropagationFlags>, <Type>
    The one you're using doesn't have the flags. Those two flags enumerations control two things that you'll see in the GUI: 'Applies To' and 'Only Applies to this Object'. To have the ACE apply to the folder, subfolders and files (and have it not show as 'Special'
    in the GUI), you'll want the InheritanceFlags as 'ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit' and the PropagationFlags as 'None'. Try this:
    $rule = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule -ArgumentList @($domainG,"FullControl", "ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit", "None", "Allow")
    On a side note, check
    this module out. It greatly simplifies access control. If you're interested in it and have any questions, let me know.

  • How do I enable macros so that the pull-down menus in a document will work?

    I downloaded a document with pull-down menus in it. They don't work. It said I needed to "enable macros". How is that done?

    This is not a Firefox issue. The macro option will be in whatever application opens the document, for example if it is a Word document it will be a Microsoft Word setting. The Windows Secrets forum will be a more suitable place to ask, you will need to tell them what sort of document, and what version of the application you are using, for example if it is Microsoft Word are you using Word 2007 or Word 2010.
    http://windowssecrets.com/forums

  • Captivate 7: where is the "Enable SWF for conversion to iPhone application" publish option

    I'm part of a team of 20 people who are currently using Captivate 5.5 and evaluating updating to Captivate 7 or finding a new tool.
    A critical part of what we produce are iPad conversions of our Captivate/Flash software demonstrations.  We do the conversion using the Adobe Developer Tool in the AIR SDK to convert our SWF files to iPad applications.
    Captivate 7 is missing an option that we have in Captivate 5.5, "Enable SWF for conversion to iPhone application".  Without this option we cannot convert to iPad applications using AOT mode but are forced to use Interpreter mode.  Interpreter mode results in unacceptable performance for anything with motion such as segments with Captivate Full Motion Recording clips.
    Is there a workaround that will allow us to compile in AOT mode?  If not we will most likely not upgrade to Captivate 7 but will continue to use Captivate 5.5 and search for a different tool.
    --Hal

    Hi there,
    Please see below for the answers
    Even as of Captivate 7, there are too many restrictions on object types that can be converted. One example that comes to mind is rollover captions.  We use these extensively and they don't work with Captivate 7 HTML5 output
    As you figured out, Rollover objects are not supported in HTML5 output. The list of non-supported objects are mentioned in the link http://helpx.adobe.com/captivate/using/publish-projects-html5-files.html#unsupported_objec ts_in_html5_output
    We need a solution that is easy to distribute and load onto an iPad.
    You can either use an LMS (e.g.: Scorm CLOUD) or can use the "Adobe Captivate App Packager 7" along with PhoneGap to achieve this. This application helps you package the courses as native apps using the Adobe Phone Gap Service. Please see the link to know more about Adobe Captivate App Packager. http://helpx.adobe.com/captivate/using/captivate-app-packager.html
    We need to fill the entire screen with our demo, eliminating browser or other application elements entirely
    You can achieve it by publishing the course through "Adobe Captivate App Packager 7". Please don't select the 'Scalable HTML output' option during Captivate publish as the HTML5 output may not work well on Ipads.
    We need a solution that works when an iPad is offline such as wandering around a show floor.
    You meant, you need an offline solution to track 'Reporting or Completion'? If that is not the case then again "Adobe Captivate App Packager 7" solves the issue.
    We prefer a solution that doesn't require additional software to be purchased for each iPad.
    To publish an iOS app through Adobe App packager and Phone gap, you need to get the "Certificate password and PhoneGap'
    Thanks,
    Nimmy Sukumaran.

  • Enable lync for user

    hello
    i want to know how can i enable lync for one user in active directory without creating mailbox .
    i  am using lync 2013
    thanks

    A mailbox isn't required for creating a Lync user. You can enable the user for Lync using the Lync Control Panel or running Enable-CsUser in Powershell (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg520961.aspx and/or http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398711.aspx)
    The sign-in name will be in an e-mail address format ([email protected]), but a mailbox isn't actually required. You can specify the sign-in address when enabling the user.
    If this helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer" | Blog
    www.lynced.com.au | Twitter
    @imlynced

Maybe you are looking for