Enhacement: tax determination in invoice correction

Hello!
I have to set tax determination in invoice correction, according to: "Tax clasyfication material" (TAXM1) but importing from preceding invoice (VBRP), not from master data.
How would you solve this problem?
Thanks in advans for any helpfull ideas.

Hi,
You have changed the master before the preceding document has been created i guess, in that case it will be picked up from the preceding document.
What ever master data you have will only impact on the new documents which you create and not on the old documents.
Thanks,
Mahesh.

Similar Messages

  • Tax determination in invoice correction

    Hello!
    I have to set tax determination in invoice correction, according to: "Tax clasyfication material" (TAXM1) but importing from preceding invoice (VBRP), not from master data.
    How would you solve this problem?
    Thanks in advans for any helpfull ideas.

    Hi,
    You have changed the master before the preceding document has been created i guess, in that case it will be picked up from the preceding document.
    What ever master data you have will only impact on the new documents which you create and not on the old documents.
    Thanks,
    Mahesh.

  • Another tax determination code being picked up along with right tax determination code during creation of BBP

    Hi Experts,
    There is an issue I am facing while creating BBP, the slices in table DFKKMOP are having another tax determination code being picked up along with the right tax detemination code.
    E.g. -> In EK02 for the BBP I have configured tax determination code ZA for main 0051 and sub 0050 for all the company codes, but it is also picking ZX  which I have configured for main 100 - sub 202,203 , main - 200 sub 202,203 , main 300- sub 202,203.
    Strangely In the table DFKKMOP the tax determination code ZX is coming in the line which has main 0051 and sub 0050.
    I dont understand why ZX is being shown in the field BB grouping - Budget Billing: Grouping Key for Tax Determination Code.
    I have double checked the customizing in EK02 and I dont find this tax determination code being defined for main 0051/sub 0050, then why is it being picked up for BBP line item in table DFKKMOP.
    Any suggestions are appreciated.

    Well the issue was during creation of BBP items in DFKKMOP the VAT corresponding to Main/Sub 100/ 3xx was being picked up and when I adapted the tax determination code there. The items was created without any split.
    For the second one PA issue, well in this case the tax determination in the standard during the creation of PA invoice via EA27 is happening on the date of execution and not on the selection date or posting date. This is because in SPRO the config. of invoicing <<Define Basic Settings for Invoicing>>
    has <<Date type for tax determination in Invoicing for Part. Bills.>> set to <<tax determination in invoicing based on entry date>> that is why it takes the execution date into  consideration.So even when we do a posting for SOLLDAT in future to take another tax code it doesnt take that SOLLDAT instead takes todays execution date for which the new tax code is not valid.
    To overcome this issue either we need to make the new tax code valid from date in past ie. before the date of execution or we need to change this parameter in customizing <<Define Basic Settings for Invoicing>> to <<tax determination in invoicing based on Posting date>>.
    Voilà!

  • Tax determination third party process

    Hi all,
    I need to re-determined taxes during invoice creation for a third party sales flow.
    To explain the case:
    SO: company 1000 Country XX
    PO: company 1000 Departure country YY
    Invoice SO: tax determination as:
         Departure country YY
         Arrival county XX
    At the moment the SAP consider as deaprture country XX and not YY.
    In which way the system can consider as departure country the country of the vendor and not the one of the sales organization?
    Let me know if you need further information.
    Thank you in advance,
    Manuele

    While Tax determinations--any way you are going to take the region of the delivering plant(not sales org)
    If you maintain tax classifications for customer and Material--maintain the Tax rates which will take care of Tax in sales order.
    Any way your vendor will bill to you not to customer--So if you follow the first Two points--which will take care of Tax.
    I think coding corrections here--may not be suggestible.
    Pl update.
    Phanikumar

  • Printing witholding tax in AP invoice

    In the layout to print the Ap invoice i need to print the witholding tax. however the invoice can be in local currency or foreign currency. i can not find the variable to use which will work in both case. Either I get the local currency or the foreign currency value. I do not want to make two forms, one for each case.
    in teh same context i would like to know ehre or how i can find the syatem variable number corresponding to the different variables.

    Hello,
    The determination of the withholding tax in the order is correct,     
    because there are only the condition base value is display, but not   
    the condition value.                                                  
    This systembehaviour is absolutely correct, because the withholding   
    tax is only now active in FI.                                         
    Therefore this condition type is only displayed in SD without values. 
    For the determination of the withholding tax a table with the data    
    of the withholding taxes is build. (taccit_wt)                        
    Therefore you need the customizing settings from FI and it is not possible to determine the values in the SD documents.
    Regards
    Claudia
    If you are satisfied with the answer, please give Reward Points

  • Witholding tax in Sales invoice

    Hi All,
    Just want to ask how to set up automatic computation of witholding tax in Sales invoice created in Sales & Distribution module. We already set up all necessary configuration in FI and customer master data. During postings in TCode FB75, the witholding tax automatically post in the transaction entry.
    But during SD transaction, there is an automatical computation of witholding tax but the amount is zero and the witholding code is blank.
    Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks.

    Hello,
    The determination of the withholding tax in the order is correct,     
    because there are only the condition base value is display, but not   
    the condition value.                                                  
    This systembehaviour is absolutely correct, because the withholding   
    tax is only now active in FI.                                         
    Therefore this condition type is only displayed in SD without values. 
    For the determination of the withholding tax a table with the data    
    of the withholding taxes is build. (taccit_wt)                        
    Therefore you need the customizing settings from FI and it is not possible to determine the values in the SD documents.
    Regards
    Claudia
    If you are satisfied with the answer, please give Reward Points

  • Report to check Taxes before posting invoice to accounting..

    Hi All,
    Could you please help me if there are any report  to see the taxes before  the invoices are posting to accounting?
    If we dont have it in invoice level then its ok if we can check the taxes at  sales order level.
    In sales order i undestand we can  check in VBAK-Doc Condition field pull the sales order to KONV to enter the Doc condition # that  shows all the condition types and values.
    However, this does not show the sales order number and it wont be helpful at user level.
    Hope there should be some standard report for this function and seeking help here.
    Thanks in advance
    Best Regards,
    Ram

    Hi Ram
    Instead of letting users report on taxes, rather tighten up on controls within SAP:
    1. Make tax condition types mandatory in the pricing procedure(s)
    2. Configure the tax condition types such that only automatically determined values are allowed
    3. Ensure that you have tax condition records to deal with all eventualities (including zero value condition records).
    HTH
    James

  • Excise not captured in the MIGO & Tax calculation is not correct in the PO.

    Excise Settings completed.                    02.11.2007
    a)     Configuration done as per J05 Building block.( Tax Procedure TAXINN)
    b)     Maintained J1ID, all steps.
    c)     Maintained tax code in FTXP.
    d)     FV11 &#61664; Maintained for Material, vendor, Plant in combination with Tax code input tax maintained in FTXP.
    e)     Checked CIN Health, all tick are green.
    f)     Given all G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type (ETT)
    g)     Maintained all number Ranges.
    Issue &#61664; 1)
    Tax calculation is not correct in the PO, tax tab
    a)     JMIP is appearing 12% in condition amount, (as per condition record) but condition value is Zero, (Not calculated by the FI Pricing procedure). Screen shot for Pricing procedure, PO taxes and condition record given below.
    b)     JIPC Sales tax 4% in condition amount (as per condition record) , calculated by the FI Pricing procedure is 8%, condition value is Rs 8 instead of Rs 4
    Fi pricing procedure.
    PO Taxes &#61664; wrong Tax calculated
    FV11&#61664; Condition record
    Issue &#61664; 2)
    While creating Goods receipt aginst PO (Tax code V2 in PO). Movement type 101, Excise tab appears at Header and Item level and we need to put the Vendors Excise Invoice and date, nothing is copied from the PO for Excise duty  & sales tax.
    Now we put the values for ED and Sales tax manually in the MIGO and saved the document. While display material document, excise tab is not there i.e. no excise related activiy is captured here in goods receipt.
    If you need more detail, please revert on cell 093295 53235.
    Please suggest.
    Manish Gupta
    93295 53235
    [email protected]

    Hai,
    1.Check the condition types JMIP & JMIC in IMG - Financial accting New - FI AC Global settings - Taxes on sales and purchases - Check calculation procedure - Define condition type.
    2.The condition types you have used are defined for non deductible taxes i.e., it gets inventorised, added to the material account.And also the accural key assigned to this condition types are NVV - defined for non ded input taxes.
    3.Instead the condition types defined by SAP Standard system for BED & ST are JMOP & JIPS and the accurals assigned to this are VS1 & VS5.
    If you want clear details mail the screen shots to my id [email protected]

  • Problem with Excise Duty tax calcualtion in Invoice

    Hi experts,
    Need your rexpert advise on the below issue.
    We have MM invoice where by the tax is not calucalted correctly.
    The Material is subject to excise duty, on the GR the excise invoice is getting generated with Cenvat clering account with correct amount towards excise duty
    i.e. GR is done for amount - 52951.33 and corresponding Tax code is KE(10% excise duty, 3% Ecess and 2% CST) which comes correctly as 6214.73 approximately which is correct in case of GR
    But however when the Invoice is posted for corresponding GR, the amount of tax calculated is only 1307.50, which should have been 6214.73 as the amount on the GR.
    We really are not able to find out why their is diffrences in the calculation of excise duty.
    Request your expert advise on this regard.
    Thanks.
    Shahid.

    System will fetch the duties from J_1IGRXREF table into MIRO transaction. So firstly check whether duties are correctly updated for the respective Excise invoice in the said table.
    Secondly ensure you have selected the correct tax code in MIRO same as PO tax code. There may be a chance that user had changed the tax code after posting the GRN in the Purchase order.
    Finally check whether the condition records are valid for the selected tax code in FV13 transaction code and are not set to deleted.

  • Invoice Correction Requests

    Hi Friends,
    As per client's requirement which is as follows
    Material is sold to customer say with price of Rs 100/- per item. But my client is realised that the price of Rs 100/ per item is on lower side. So client is now wants to charge Rs 150 per item.And it also reflect in chages in Excise and taxes applicable to that. Now I can create the invoice correction request for the same. Which I created...
    But I am facing following problem as
    1. Instead of positives values I am getting negative values in Invoice correction request.
    2. I should be able to  create the debit memo..for the difference amount. i.e. Rs 50/- per item.
    3. what type of copy control should I maintain in order to get the right result.
    Kindly advice
    thanks in advance
    shailesh

    Hi there,
    Invoice correction Request RK is configured to trigger a credit memo. But it can be manually be over written.
    When you create a invoice correction request (which is always referenced from invoice), system will create 2 line entries for each line item in the invoice.
    The 1st item is a credit item, 2nd item is a debit item. It will substract the 2nd item from the 1st item. + value indicates credit memo, negative value indicates debit memo.
    For eg if you have 10 items in your case, this is what happens in the system:
    Credit item: 10 items X Rs 100 === Rs 1000
    Debit item: 10 items X Rs 150 === Rs -1500
    Difference===================Rs - 500
    The minus indicates we need to receive the amount from the customer.
    So against the invoice correction request we create a debit memo in this case in VF01.
    Regards,
    Sivanand

  • Invoice correction request / pricing

    Hi all ;
    I create a invoice correction request with referance an invoice while i get all condition types in sales order like belowed.
    ZFIY : Price , ZI01 : Discount , ZKDV : Tax
    I want to change it this pricing with ;
    Clear discounts and modify ZFIY with net price as same as ZFIY : 4,65 TRY.
    To get it , i work on user-exit -->
    USEREXIT_PRICING_COPY (module pool SAPLV61A, program RV61AFZA)
    But , i can not achieve it. Is there any ways to solve problem ?
    Regards.
    M.Ozgur Unal

    Hi Eduardo Hinojosa ;
    I checked note 24832 but i can not get VBAK structure in the user-exit.
    I do not have any idea to solve this problem.
    Sample code :
    FORM USEREXIT_PRICING_COPY.
      DATA: LS_KONV LIKE KONV ,
            LV_ISKONTO TYPE P DECIMALS 2,
            LS_VBAK LIKE VBAK.
      IF VBTYP_NEW EQ 'K'.
        SELECT SINGLE * INTO LS_VBAK
    FROM VBAK
    WHERE KNUMV = DOCUMENT_NUMBER_FROM.
        IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0 AND
           LS_VBAK-AUART EQ 'ZRK'.
          IF KONV-KSCHL = 'ZFIY'.
            CLEAR: LS_KONV,
                          LS_VBAK.
            SELECT SINGLE * INTO LS_KONV
    FROM KONV
    WHERE KNUMV EQ DOCUMENT_NUMBER_FROM AND
    KPOSN EQ ITEM_NUMBER_FROM     AND
    KSCHL EQ 'ZI01'.
            IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
    LV_ISKONTO = LS_KONV-KBETR / 10.
    LV_ISKONTO = 10000 + LV_ISKONTO .
    KONV-KBETR = KONV-KBETR * LV_ISKONTO / 10000.
    KONV-KWERT = KONV-KAWRT * KONV-KBETR / 1000.
    KONV-KMPRS = 'X'.
    KONV-KHERK = 'C'.
    KONV-KSTEU = 'C'.
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
          IF KONV-KSCHL EQ 'ZI01'.
            U15_SUBRC = 4 .
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      ENDFORM.  
    Regards.
    M.Ozgur Unal               

  • Invoice Correction Request- Both the lines with G2N

    Hi
    I  am facing a problem while using a standard invoice correction request with reference to billing document.
    In the standard SAP, there should be 2 line items created one with item category G2N and one with item category L2N which we can change the quantity and price.
    In my system I got both line with the same item category G2N and hence I can not perform any changes to the line item.
    In the Copy Control Setting, I see  source item Category TAN AND TARGET G2N AND L2N which is how it should be for Invoice correction requrest.
    I see the Item category determination for RK - - G2N and RK--G2N G2N  (some of the SAP documents say it is standard and no need of L2N in the determination).  Still, I tried with changing L2N as well in the default with header item being G2N but no luck.
    Is this a bug in standard SAP? Do we need to apply some notes? Or Is there any specific config/routine to be applied?
    Request your help in this.
    Regards

    Hi,
    As you are creating a Invoice Correction request with reference to an Invoice Document.Standard SAP explains as
    In most cases, an invoice correction request is created with the aim that a credit memo is generated. In the standard system, the invoice correction request is therefore characterized as a credit memo request, which means that the system creates a credit memo based on the invoice correction request.
    In Customizing, you can change this, so that the invoice correction request is characterized as a debit memo request. In this case, the system creates a debit memo, based on the invoice correction request. You can change these settings in Customizing under Sales  S ales Documents  Sales document header  Define sales document types in the Sales document categ. field.
    Regardless of whether the invoice correction request is a credit or debit memo, the first item is always a credit item and the second is a debit item.
    The system creates two items in the invoice correction request for each item in the Invoice:
    1)Credit Item- Credits
    2)Debit Item-Debit
    Kindly Cross check your Copy Control for your Source Billing Document type and Target Invoice Correction request.
    Confirm for the ITEM Category TAN and TARGET G2N AND L2N.
    Create the Invoice Correction request by referring an Invoice and notice the 2 items for each Billing Item.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Difference between tax determination procedure and pricing procedure....

    Hi,
    What is the use of Tax determination procedure when we maintain tax condition types in pricing procedure.(and condition records will pick the correct tax rates).
    My question is that, can we trigger an o/p tax without maintaining a tax procedure at document type level?If yes then what is the basic use of tax determination procedure in SAP?

    Tax procedure is being used in the Country Version India Add-On and requires to maintain additional data in the Excise Rate Maintenance transaction, J1ID. Each of the excise duties in the tax Procedure Tax procedure has its own condition types, and each condition type is assigned to a formula in the standard SAP. This formula instructs the system to calculate the excise duty using the data that have been maintained in the Excise Rate Maintenance transaction.
    FTXP for a country is determine from TAX procedure assign to the country.
    [Entering content frame formula-based excise determination (LO)|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/pt/e6/2adbdec6974f4c9f35d732b108d09e/content.htm]
    [Formula-Based Excise Determination|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/de/20/53bfce14ff11d4b5b1006094b9ec21/content.htm]
    [Condition-Based Excise Determination|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/ru/08/34bc3cdc322866e10000000a114084/content.htm]
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Purchase Order Tax Determination

    Hi Experts,
    We have a scenario for taxes in our Purchase Order that I need help understanding.  Our Plant is based in the the NJ within the US.  Occasionally, we purchase items from a Vendor based in NJ; however, the Supplier is based in PA.  In this case, the items are taxable and subject to NJ and PA taxes.  The PA tax is 6 % and the NJ tax is 7 %.
    Based on NJ tax law, "If you make a purchase in another state which has a lower sales tax rate than New Jersey, use tax is due at the rate of 7%. If, however, that state has sales tax reciprocity with New Jersey, a credit is allowed for the sales tax paid to that state." In this particular case, we are interpreting any purchase from PA to NJ will incur a PA sales tax of 6 % and a NJ sales tax of 1 % (since there is a credit with PA and the PA tax is less than the NJ tax).
    In our Vendor Master, we have the Goods Supplier partner tax jursidiction populate on the Invoice Tab of the Purchase Order which will give us the PA 6 % sales tax based on our configuration within transaction FXTP.  However, the "use tax" for NJ is not determined in this fashion.  It appears that the Taxes on this tab are only in relation to the PA tax jurisdiction code which is determined on the Invoice Tab.  Under the conditions tab, we have conditions that will give us all of the necessary percentages.  However, these percentages do not appear to be reflected for the taxes under the invoice tab.
    Are the taxes under the conditions tab in any way linked to those taxes determined under the invoice tab of the purchase order?  Can anyone help me understand the relationship between condition taxes (such as Condition Type NAVS) and the Taxes (under the Invoice tab) within a Purchase Order?
    Thanks for your help in advance.
    John

    Hi,
       If the condition category is N (non deductible taxes), condition class is D and cal type is B for an MM pricing condition type (in M/06), system will bring all the non deductible taxes (with account key NVV or similar) from tax procedure (invoice tab - taxes window)  to MM pricing procedure (conditions tab).
       If the condition category is D along with the above combination, for an MM condition type in M/06, system will bring all the taxes (including deductible and non deductible) from tax procedure to the MM pricing procedure.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Tax determination in sales document

    Hello,
    I have one issue regarding tax determination.
    We have changes of tax conditions starting from 1st july 2010.
    We setup new tax conditions within VK11 / MWST.
    => fine!
    My scenario is:
    - User created an offer (VA21) in june 2010 with old tax condition.
    - Now in july 2010 e.g. user will create an order with ref. to that offer.
    Problem: The order has the old tax code.
    Tax is as I understood determined by "Service rendered date". As I do not have a service rendered date within offers I checked the behaviour of "Req. deliv. date" in the overview dialog of VA02.
    When I change "Req. deliv. date" to july date and "carry out new pricing" tax is with new tax code.
    As I cannot recommend to the user to always check "Req. deliv. date" and then do a "carry out new pricing",
    I would like to ask you what the correct way is.
    Thanks for your replies.

    Hi,
    first, let me thank you for your replies !!!!!!
    @Azeez:
    you said: "Kindly check the proposal for pricing date and proposal valid from date in VOV8 for document types"
    => They are set to BLANK and I guess copied from offer AG to order TA.
    @JP:
    you said: "Check Pricing date in Control data 2: for your condition type (Tax). For your case maintain that as D: Creation date (KOMK-ERDAT)."
    => It's set to BLANK as well. Means KOMK-PRSDT, tax KOMK-FBUDA)
    => I do not really know whether I can change this parameter, cause condition is used in other calc schemes as well
    => What is the effect of changing it to "D" ?
    Thx
    Wolfi.

Maybe you are looking for