Enhanced 3 fields unavailable in BI after DS enhancement

I did datasource enhancement in R/3 to add 3 fields into DS "0FI_GL_4". Then I go to RSA6 to click unhide for those 3 fields, activate DS. And then I put coding in CMOD. After that I replicate DS to BW system. I found those 3 fields are existing in DS, but the Transfer check box show uncheck for those 3 fields. That mean those 3 enhanced fields are still unavailable in BI. Does anybody know the reason for that?

Hi,
Need few clarifications.
You said that Transfer check box is Unchecked. Which Transfer check box you are refering to?
Regards,
Nagasekhar

Similar Messages

No Data in Field Scrap quantity (AMGLG) after Append DataSource 2LIS_04_P_COMP (Component View from PP/PP-PI)

Hi experts,
we enhanced the BI Content standard DataSource 2LIS_04_P_COMP "Component View from PP/PP-PI" with the field AMGLG (Scrap quantity) per maintenance of the relevant extract structure MC04P_0COM via LBWE:
The enhancement of the extract structure worked fine.
Unfortunately the enhanced field is not filled after the Statistical Setup of the LIS Application 04 "Production" (t/code OLI4BW).
RSA3 -> 2LIS_04_P_COMP:
Any ideas or experiences?
Many thanks in advance and regards,
Michael

Attached one example:
BW DataSource 2LIS_04_P_COMP:
ERP Summarized BOM Multilevel (t/code CS13) Component 456:
ERP Summarized BOM Multilevel (t/code CS13) Component 301:
Any ideas why there are no values for the field AMGLG extracted?
Thanks and regards,
Michael

Unable to view enhanced field in Data Source

Hi All,
We recently upgraded our R/3 system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. Now when we are enhancing the data source, the field is visible in the Extract Structure. But we are unable to view it in the data source. We checked out in RSA2 the enhanced field attribute is specified as 'Field in OLTP and BW Hidden by SAP'. We have written code to modifiy the ROOSFIELD table to make the enahnced field visible. But this is the problem with all the data sources. Whenever, we have to enahnce, we have to go thru this process to make the enhanced field visible.
Is it like that we missied out any patch in ECC 6.0 while upgrade? If any person faced similar situation, please help us.

Hi Ravi,
I think you are missing a step here. As soon as you enhance your datasource with new fields, by default, those 2 check boxes are checked ( Hidden and Field in User exit only). You go to RSA6, edit your datasource and here, you can uncheck these added fields so that you can use them. You do not need to write any code to change the fields settings in ROOSFIELD table. Do the step I mentioned above after enhancing and you should be good. Hope it helps.
Thanks and Regards
Subray Hegde

R/3 APO Integration: Enhanced Fields not transferred

Hi,
My requirement is when I change the value of an enhanced field in a material in MM02 in R/3, the change should be reflected in the corresponding product in APO.
I want to enhance the Material Master in R/3 and APO with a Z field. I have done this by enhancing the MARA table through an APPEND structure and /SAPAPO/MATKEY using the Customer Enhancement Structure CI_MATKEY. And also I have enhanced the Customer Enhancement Structure CI_MTKYCUS for mapping of the enhanced Material Matser field between R/3 and APO. After that I have written the logic inside the Exit Function Module EXIT_SAPLCMAT_001 in R/3 for the mapping of this new field with APO.
But the problem is that still the value of the newly enhanced field is not getting updated in APO. Please advise how to solve this issue.
Regards,
Rahul Muraleedharan.

Hi Ravi,
1) During deployment run, based on the transportation lanes that you have
maintained, system will consider the available stocks as receipts and
creates stock transfer requests (ie Dep conrel). These orders are
intermittent elements and will be generated during deployment process
and will not be transferred from APO to R/3 and will remain in APO
itself.
2) During TLB process, the request orders generated during step 1
will be considered and the stock transfer requestes will be converted
to stock transfer orders or otherwise called STOs. These STOs or
conrels will transfer from APO to R/3.
Hope it is clear now. Please confirm
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Elements 10, windows 8, 64 bit, epson artisan 835 printer: prints are really dark even after using enhancements like adjusting lighting. Prints are darker than photoshop edit screen. Prints are acceptable using paint, windows photo viewer, or gallery.

Elements 10, Windows 8, 64 bit, Epson Artisan 835 printer: Prints are really dark even after applying enhancements, like adjusting lighting. Prints are darker than Photoshop Edit Screen. Prints are acceptable using Paint, Windows Photoviewer, or Photo Gallery.

In general theory, one now has the Edit button for their posts, until someone/anyone Replies to it. I've had Edit available for weeks, as opposed to the old forum's ~ 30 mins.
That, however, is in theory. I've posted, and immediately seen something that needed editing, only to find NO Replies, yet the Edit button is no longer available, only seconds later. Still, in that same thread, I'd have the Edit button from older posts, to which there had also been no Replies even after several days/weeks. Found one that had to be over a month old, and Edit was still there.
Do not know the why/how of this behavior. At first, I thought that maybe there WAS a Reply, that "ate" my Edit button, but had not Refreshed on my screen. Refresh still showed no Replies, just no Edit either. In those cases, I just Reply and mention the [Edit].
Also, it seems that the buttons get very scrambled at times, and Refresh does not always clear that up. I end up clicking where I "think" the right button should be and hope for the best. Seems that when the buttons do bunch up they can appear at random around the page, often three atop one another, and maybe one way the heck out in left-field.
While I'm on a role, it would be nice to be able to switch between Flattened and Threaded Views on the fly. Each has a use, and having to go to Options and then come back down to the thread is a very slow process. Jive is probably incapable of this, but I can dream.
Hunt

Set up table contains the enhanced field information?

Hi Experts,
I am enhancing a field in the datasource 2lis_11_vaitm,
Things i did :
1.Enhanced the ext.structure with the required field.
2.Activated the ext.structure.
3.Witten the logic in the CMOD.
4. Deleted the Setup table and refilled.
Now my question is :
1.Did the setup table contains the ENHANCED FIELD with the historical data ?if so where to see that?
I checked in RSA3 the enhanced field is displayed with the records.
The code i have wriiten is WHEN "DATASOURCE " then -> logic from the base table.
Now will the data come from the base table or from the setup table?
Can any one help me in this issue.
Best Regards
Jelina

Why do we need to delete the setup table after doing enchancement with standard Datasource.
Ans :
You neednot refill the setup table just because you enhanced the datasource.
You need to delete and refill if the postings happened after you filled the setup table.
Meaning you will miss the current posting.Unless you have done a init in BI/BW side.
Hope this helps.

Enhanced Field is Blank - Debug with RSA3 - Unable to see the code in Exit

Hi all,
I have created a View on a table and created the Generic Extractor on that View and enhanced the Extract Structure to add a Amount field along with Currency Key. I have added the ABAP code to fill that new field. The same code has worked fine in Sandbox and copied the same into Dev. Everything worked fine and it populated the data into that enhanced field in Sandbox, but something is wrong in Dev. I have set the Break-Point after my Generic Extractor in the Exit's Include member ZXRSAU01 and tried to debug in RSA3, but it is not going there. Some how it is not recognizing the code in the User Exit. I am doing the same that I have done in the sandbox. Only initial values (0.00) are there in that field. That field is un-hided.
What could be the problem, please ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Venkat.

HI Venkat,
Look at ur Datasource is Trancsaction Data or Materdata Attributes/Text.If it T.Data use Incled ZXRSAU01 or For Master Data attributes use ZXRSAU02 or Text
ZXRSAU03.
And Observe the Exit is Active or not and Debug the code once.

SP13 / Personalization / Customer enhancement fields

Hello all,
In SP13 personalization were extended:
- It is possible to insert customer enhancement fields in views
- Order of view elements can be changed
- Personalization can be send via transport system
I see it as significant improvement and would like to use it in our system.
But there are some questions.
Normally I define with matrix layout columns and place in each column UI elements (MatrixHeadData).
Column1 Column2
field1.1 field2.1
field1.2 field2.2
cust.field cust.field
Then I can insert customer enhancement fields in each column. It works fine.
1. How can i deactivate custom fields at runtime? Can i bind properties to context? I assume customer fields are created after wddomodify.
2. It would be also nice if I could switch declarative inserted fields in view between columns (containers).
I hope that SAP will constantly extend personalization features. Short note from SAP people about intention for further development is welcome.
Regards
Paul

Hi
I guess... Spelling is wrong here.. Its.. "HEADER" not "HEADR"
Please look for the following Standard SRM structures for SUS using SE11 Transaction ->
INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF_SUSASN Customer Enhancements on SUS ASN Header
INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF_SUSCF Customer Enhancements on SUS CF Header
INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF_SUSINV Customer Enhancements on Invoice Header (SUS)
INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF_SUSPCO Cust.Enhancements in SUSPCO Header
INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF_SUSPO Cust.Enhancements in SUS PO Header
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Delta records are not populating for enhanced fields in 2LIS_17_I3HDR

Hello,
       I have an issue with 2LIS_17_I3HDR datasource, i have enhanced the DS with Zfields, these are populated from AUFK through user exit. When i fill setup table, i can see the values being populated for enhanced fields, but for delta records, i dont find any values for these enhanced fields, even though the values exists in the AUFK table and i even tried degugging the user exit code, it doesnt go through it during the posting of delta records.
Can some one give some suggestion on this issue.
Thanks,
          Pavan

Hello Ravi,
                 Yes, delta records cannot be populated by enhanced fields. Here the issue is different,
i have added a closed date to the extract structure, this is order specific, so when i create a new PM order after the full load, and release the order and close it, the AUFK table get an entry for closed date, my exit compare the object number of the extractor to object number in AUFK and get the closed date value to the DS, this is not same as enabling delta on the enhanced fields (which cant be done).
Thanks,
            Pavan

IS-RETAIL: How to update custom enhancement field using BAPI?

Hi gurus,
Like ECC BAPI: BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA,
This BAPI(BAPI_MATERIAL_MAINTAINDATA_RT) is specific for IS-RETAIL to create and update material master data.
But now If I append one custom field "ZFIELD" to end of table MARA, my question is how to update this custom enhancement field(ZFIELD) using BAPI(BAPI_MATERIAL_MAINTAINDATA_RT)
Thanks in advance!

Hi DongHai,
I suggest you create your own BAPI. Just copy the codes in BAPI_MATERIAL_MAINTAINDATA_RT and add your custom fields. If you want to append the data of the custom field in table MARA, first, you have to create a structure table then goto SE11, type MARA and display. Click the APPEND STRUCTURE then choose the structure that you've created. Hope this will help.
Rewards if useful
Regards,
Mark

Regarding to enable transfered option for enhanced field in BI 7.0

Hi Experts,
I am working on a requirement for which i have enhanced fields at RSA 6 extractor level and then I removed hide options from those enhanced fields and then I had replicate it at BI system but then what happen na for those fields that i have enhance transfered option at DataSource level in BI side is not enable.Even at Bi level edit button at DataSource level is disabled.So I cannot even edit it.Iam using Emulated DataSource ( 3.5 DataSource ) in BI 7.0.The DataSource is available in activate version.Can any body suggest any thing how to enable transfered option in BI 7.0 when it is disabled.
Thanks & Regards
Vinod kumar

Hi
Check if you have Authorization to Replicate/Change / Active for the DS, BASIS Team can help you with this.
R/3 side
Recheck for your enhanced / Appended fields at R/3 Side .
Make sure that you have saved/Activated the Code/DS/Structure.
RSA6 -- Check your DS for the enhanced Fields again / Transport the Same again.
BI Side
RSA13--Source System --Say Replicate DS -- Now see if you can access the enhanced fields here.
As you said you are using emulated DS -- Check if your Transfer/Update Rules are Active for the DS.. Try to activate the same with RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL / RSDS_DATASOURCE_ACTIVATE_ALL/ RSDS_UPDR_REACTIVATE_ALL...
Hope it helps and clear

Data not populated for Enhanced field

Hello,
I had done enhancement by adding field to the LO Datasource.
Written the code in the CMOD to populate the data. When i run init it worked fine and i am able to see the data for the enhanced filed.
When i run delta iam not able to see the data for that field in RSA7, But i am able to see the data in RSA3.
What is the reason that i am not able to see the data for the enhanced field in RSA7?
Thanks in Advance!
Regards
M.A

Hi M.A,
This means that there is no delta data for that field.
If there is no change in the data for that field then you cannot see any data in RSA7.
Check in the Delta repetition in the RSA7 for any data for that field.
Regards,
ravi Kanth

After deleting enhanced view still the bsp application is showing in se80

Hi,
I enhanced one component then after some reason i deleted the enhanced view at that time it's asked do you want to delete bsp application i click on yes then after also still i showing in se 80 under my package it's showing.
after deleting enhancement view and deleted enhancement component.
after deleting these total still all the z classes are showing in sm24. if i enhance from starting on wards from enhancing component and enhancing view i need to new bsp application name because previous bsp application is still showing and some of the context class. after transporting in to quality server this component is showing there is context class which i redefine in the development and view is not defined in the run time repository. why it's showing these errors in quality server.
my guess is in dev i deleted which are deleted still the classes and bsp application are there older one if provide new bsp classes also.
what are important things we need to follow if delete the view enhancement and deleting the component enhancement. because if i transport after deleting with new bsp application name and with a previous existing class with a new request also it's not working quality server. because lot of classes are generating automatically in when we redefine the context class in development so these classes are not there in quality server.
please guide me if delete any enhanced view and component why still bsp application and redefine z classes are showing in se80 and se24. because if enhance newly also and redefine also it's considering previous bsp application and previous redefine classes.
what are precautions i need to take if i delete enhanced view and enhance component.please guide me.
jemmi.

Jemmi,
You should follow the following SAP Note in deleting enhancements. There are a few steps to be done in SM34. If we just delete through the wizard we are bound to have these issues.
SAP Note 1122248 - Consultation:Procedure when dealing w/framework enhancements
Briefly, these are the steps to delete the enhancemnet-
1) In SM34, view BSPWDVC_CMP_EXT. Select enhancement set and then select enhancement definition. You will see your component there.
2) Select your component and in left side navigation click Controller Substitutes.
3) A list of the enhanced views are displayed.
4) Select the views and delete it. Before you delete make a note of the BSP application these views are attached to. Hopefully, you attached them in a Z BSP application
5) Go to SE80. Select the Z BSP application and delete it.
Go through the SAP Note to understand the process in more detail.

Syntax Error after creating enhancements for subroutine

Problem:
Creating enhancement sections gives a syntax error when creating enhancement options and implementations for a subroutine and then ceating enhancement options and implementations for the call to that same subroutine.

Syntax Error:
"Different number of parameters in FORM and PERFORM (routine: SET_LAYOUT, number of formal parameters: 2, number of actual parameters: 1)


Here's the following scenario:


A subroutine is defined in a program.
The subroutine is called within the same program.


I then executed these steps:
 1. Defined an enhancement section around the subroutine definition
 2. Defined an enhancement section around the subroutine call.
 3. Implemented the enhancement section around the subroutine definition and add an additional parameter.


 Currently, this gives a syntax error as expected, since the call to the subroutine needs 1 more parameter.


 4. Implemented the enhancement section for the subroutine call. I change the call in the implementation so it passes the new parameter.


A syntax check to this gives an error. The syntax checker is not only checking the new implementation, but also the original subroutine that should have been overwritten.


The enhancement sections use the same enhancement spot, and the enhancement implementations use the same implementation.


I tried various combinations of using different enhancement spots and/or implementations, but all give the same syntax error. I tried separating the subroutine in a different include and retried my testing, but it still gave the same syntax error.


Here's the sample code I first created to try troubleshooting the problem:


<pre>
ENHANCEMENT-SECTION ZEP_Z_MICHAEL_02 SPOTS ZES_Z_MICHAEL .
 PERFORM set_layout
 CHANGING
 wa_layout.
END-ENHANCEMENT-SECTION.
$$-Start: ZEP_Z_MICHAEL_02----
$$
ENHANCEMENT 2 ZEI_TEST_SECTIONS.
 "inactive version
 PERFORM set_layout
 using 'X'
 CHANGING
 wa_layout.
ENDENHANCEMENT.
$$-End: ZEP_Z_MICHAEL_02----
$$
ENHANCEMENT-SECTION ZEP_Z_MICHAEL_01 SPOTS ZES_Z_MICHAEL STATIC .
FORM set_layout
CHANGING p_wa_layout TYPE slis_layout_alv.
p_wa_layout-zebra = 'X'.
wa_layout-no_colhead = 'X'..
p_wa_layout-colwidth_optimize ='X'.
wa_layout-window_titlebar = 'Woot'.
ENDFORM. "set_layout
END-ENHANCEMENT-SECTION.
$$-Start: ZEP_Z_MICHAEL_01----
$$
ENHANCEMENT 1 ZEI_TEST_SECTIONS.
 "inactive version
FORM set_layout
using p_test type boolean
CHANGING p_wa_layout TYPE slis_layout_alv.
p_wa_layout-zebra = 'X'.
wa_layout-no_colhead = 'X'..
p_wa_layout-colwidth_optimize ='X'.
wa_layout-window_titlebar = 'Woot'.
ENDFORM. "set_layout
ENDENHANCEMENT.
$$-End: ZEP_Z_MICHAEL_01----
$$
</pre>


Please let me know if you think I am doing something wrong.


Thanks, 
Mike

Edited by: Michael Herman on Mar 8, 2010 8:11 PM

Yes, Sandra. That is what did and it worked with no syntax errors!
I'm not sure if this is getting off topic or not, but the SAP documentation(taken from the SAP help after pressing F1 on the keyword static in ERP6) seems misleading:
"The STATIC addition is intended for the enhancement of data declarations, while the statement ENHANCEMENT-POINT without the STATIC addition is designed for the enhancement of executable coding."
I would think the enhancement section ZEP_Z_MICHAEL_02 would fall under the category of executable code, while the enhancement section ZEP_Z_MICHAEL_01 would fall under the category of declarative code.
Unfortunately, all the SAP enhancement sections I come accross are dynamic. The SAP help explains the reasoning for this:
"In contrast to the statement ENHANCEMENT-POINT, the addition STATIC of the statement ENHANCEMENT-SECTION can only be used with maximum caution for changes of data declarations, because a replacement and no completion is carried out. Especially application development within SAP should not use the addition STATIC at all with ENHANCEMENT-SECTION as the change will be active in the entire customer system. "
I do not know what the word "completion" means in the previous quote, so I can't determine why it would matter. Regardless, if a developer wanted to change a standard subroutine declaration, they would also have to mod an enhancement section to change it to static. This seems to defeat the purpose of using enhancements, but maybe this scenario is not what enhancements were intended for.

How to pass enhanced fields in BAPI_PO_CREATE

Dear Memebers,
I have a requirement to pass the Enhanced fileds in Module Function BAPI_PI_CREATE using VB.NET can anyone send me sample.
Thanks,
Nasir

Dear Nasir,
In order to pass enhanced fields to the BAPI_PO_CREATE function module, populate a table of type BAPIPAREX and pass it to the EXTENSIONIN tables parameter of the FM.
(Sample Code): Suppose you enhanced Purchasing Document Item Table EKPO with Append structure ZEKPO with the fields ZNAME1 and ZDATA1.
DATA: GT_EXTENSION TYPE TABLE OF BAPIPAREX,
WA_EXTENSION TYPE BAPIPAREX.
CLEAR WA_EXTENSION.
WA_EXTENSION-STRUCTURE = 'ZEKPO'. " 'Name of the Append Structure for Standard PO header/item table'
CONCATENATE WA_EKPO-ZNAME1 WA_EKPO-ZDATA1 INTO WA_EXTENSION-VALUEPART1. (Ensure that the total character length of these fields is less than 240)
APPEND WA_EXTENSION TO GT_EXTENSION.
Similarly, you need to pass the ZEKPOX structure with the relevant check boxes. For this, you need to refer to the documentation for Function Module but generally, Passing Enhanced Fields work this way.
Regards,
Amit Sharma

Enhanced 3 fields unavailable in BI after DS enhancement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for