EPB 3.0 and ECC 6.0

Hi
Currently we are use EBP 3.0 with SAP R3 46C as a backend.
We will upgrade soon from R3 46C to ECC 6.0.
Is EBP 3.0 Compatible with ECC 6.0? do we have to upgrade EBP 3.0 too ?
Thanks,

Hi Momo,
There is an SNOTE 835267 related to SRM 2.0(EBP 3.0)  can be connected to ERP 2004( ECC 6.0)
I dont think there is a possibility to connect EBP 3.0 to ECC 6.0.
Why dont you go for upgrade from EBP 3.0 to SRM 4.0 or more ( it is only suggession).
with regards,
mahesh

Similar Messages

  • RFC connection error between BW 3.5 and ECC 6.0

    Hi gurus,
    We've defined an RFC destination between BW 3.5 and ECC 6.0. Connection test  (SM59) is ok, but authorization one fails and ALEREMOTE users block. These users on both systems have good profiles. We look ST22 and find a runtime error on CALL_FUNCTION_REMOTE_ERROR. We've cleaned source system on BW and RFC destination and we've created one more time, but error doesn't disappear. We've looked OSS but don't find anything.
    Any idea? Is there any other place (users, RFC) where we have to change user password on system?
    Thanks a lot!
    Regards,
    Iván.
    Edited by: Iván Cabezas Castillo on Nov 6, 2009 12:09 PM

    Solved!
    This is because of the incompatibility of password handling between
    640 and 700 systems.
    We have to use a maximum 8 character long password with only capital letters (numbers are also allowed) for the user "ALEREMOTE".
    1. Change the password for the user in SAP R/3.
    2. Maintain the password in SAP BW for the RFC destination (transaction SM59 - Logon/Security tab)
    3. Authorization test is now successful.
    (SM59 - Test - Authorization).
    Regards!

  • SSO issue with BI 4.0 BW and ECC

    We currently have SAP BW 7.3 BOBJ 4.0 ECC and SAP portals.
    We have configured SAP BW, BOBJ and SAP Portal with SSO and that works perfectly fine.
    The issue is that i have Crystal Reports running on ECC that have also to be published to the Portal.
    All BW crystal reports run fine and ECC fails because of SSO -
    What am i missing here -
    Do i need to do something different for ECC
    In CMC  Authentication i have added SAP ECC and imported a role - So now i have 2 ids - one from BW and the other from ECC.
    I know this is not the way to do it but it still does not work.
    What do i need to do to have ECC and BW reports to work with SSO from SAP portal.
    Thanks

    Thank you for your reply Ingo
    I assume that your BusinessObjects Server has the SAP Authentication for BW and ECC configured ?
    *Yes *
    Are the reports for BW and ECC been called from the portal ?
    Yes
    if so then you have one BOE Server, 2 SAP environments and 2 SAP authentications configured and to achieve SSO for all systems you will have to combine the 2 SAP Systems via SNC (for XI 3.1) or via the SSO Token Service in BI4
    We are on BI4 and we have set up SSO Token for BW -
    Are you saying that we have to set up SSO token for BW as well as ECC -
    In CMC - Authentication - SAP  - Options -SAP  SSO Service - it does not give me an option to have 2 systems
    How do i add ECC system there too.
    Regards
    Ryan

  • Is there any difference between R/3 4.7 version and ECC 5.0????

    Hi All,
      Is there any difference between R/3 4.7 version and ECC 5.0 for the transaction RSA5.
    Regards,
    Andy

    Andy
    Functionality wise I didn't see any difference other than new datasources in ECC5.0
    Thnaks
    Sat

  • What is the difference between ECC 5 and ECC 6.0

    Dear Experts,
    Can any one tell me in detail the difference between SAP R/3 versions ECC 5 and ECC 6 functionality wise in MM mdoule?
    To be specific what are the new features in MM being added in ECC 6.0 when compared with ECC 5.
    Request your help in this regard.
    Rgds,
    Uzair
    Edited by: Mohd Uzair Hussain on Jul 23, 2008 5:35 PM

    Hi,
    Refer following link;
    [SAP ERP Solution Browser|http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/]
    Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned;
    Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
    u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
    u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
    u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
    Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
    u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
    u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
    u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
    u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
    - Goods receipt
    - Goods issue
    - Transfer posting
    - Remove from storage
    u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
    New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
    u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
    u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
    u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
    u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
    u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
    Requirement prioritizations in materials management
    u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
    u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
    Mass maintenance of outline agreements
    The following two transactions available:
    u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
    u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
    Commitment plan for purchase contracts
    u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
    u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
    u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
    u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
    u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
    u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
    u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
    u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
    u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
    u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
    Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
    u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
    u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
    - To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
    - Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
    u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
    - Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
    - Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
    External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
    User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
    Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
    The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
    Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
    The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
    - 107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
    - 109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
    Prepayment of invoices
    This functionality is characterized as follows:
    u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
    u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
    u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
    u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
    u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
    u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
    u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
    u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
    u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
    Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
    u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
    u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
    Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
    u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
    u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
    u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
    u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
    u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
    Parking service items
    It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
    Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
    u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
    u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
    Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
    u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
    u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
    u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
    u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location

  • SNP planned order availability date difference between APO and ECC

    Hi,
    I have observed that SNP Planned order availability date is not matching between APO and ECC. Details are as follows.
    I ran SNP Optimizer with bucket offset of 0.5. After publishing the optimizer created planned orders to ECC, only start date is matching.
    Example:
    I am using PDS as a source of supply.
    Fixed production activity in SNP PDS is 1 day.
    GR processing time: 3 day
    After running optimizer planned order is created with dates explained below.
    Start date/time: 09.05.2011 00:00:00
    End date/time: 12.05.2011 23:59:59
    Availability date: 16.05.2011 00:00:00
    Because of bucket offset defined as 0.5 optimizer planned order availability is start of next monday.
    After publishing this planned order to ECC dates on the planned order is as follows.
    Start date: 09.05.2011
    End date: 09.05.2011
    Availability date: 12.05.2011
    I have not maintained any scheduling margin key in ECC. Also if I dont define the GR processing time, planned dates between APO and ECC always match. Can anyone explain the impact of GR time on the availability date.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi Venkadesh,
    What's "state stamp"? Do you mean different time zone?
    note : 645597  mentioned by Nandha is very helpful:
    In standard, CCR will use duedate - "the available date of the output product".
    Nandha's words "In SAP APO, if the receipt date of the primary product deviates from the
    end date of the last activity of the order, the receipt date
    always identifies this as inconsistent. You cannot rectify
    inconsistencies of this type by using CCR."
    I guess in your PDS or PPM, the output product is not assigned to the End of the last activity. Someone changed it?
    Please CIF the PDS or PPM again.
    If you really want to apply a note, please use note 815509 as you're using planned order,
    and system will use order end  date in CCR instead.
    GR time is always considered. BR/Tiemin

  • What are the difference in transaction codes in 4.6 C and ECC 6.0 HCM syste

    Hi
    What are the difference in transaction codes in 4.6 C and ECC 6.0 in HCM SAP.
    Regards,
    Sanjay

    Believe there will not be any change in Tcodes.
    check these links
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/pdf/BWP_ERP2006_Upgrade.pdf
    http://service.sap.com/releasenotes
    http://service.sap.com/upgrade for functional
    https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/upgrade

  • SAP Data Archiving in R/3 4.6C and ECC 6.0.

    Hi Guys,
        Need some suggestions,
    We currently working on SAP R/3 4.6 and have plans to upgrade it to ECC 6.0,
    In the mean time there is an requirement for SAP Data Archiving for reducing the database size and increase system performance.So wanted to know if its better to do Data Archiving before upgrade or after. Technically which will be comfortable, Also wanted to know if any advanced method available in ECC 6.0 compared to SAP R/3 4.6.
    Please provide your valuable suggestion.
    Thanks and Regards
    Deepu

    Hi Deepu,
    With respect to archiving process there will be no major difference in 4.6 and ECC 6.0 system. However you may get more advantage in ECC6.0 system because of Archive routing and also upgraded Write, Delete programs (upgraded program will depend on your current program in 4.6 system). For example In 4.6 system for archive MM_EKKO write program RM06EW30, archiving of purchase document is based on company code in the selection criteria and there is no preprocessing functionality. In ECC 6.0 you can archive by purchase organization selection criteria and preprocessing functionality will additional help in archiving of PO.
    In case if you archive documents in 4.6 and later upgrade it to ECC 6.0, SAP system will assure you to retrieve the archived data.
    With this i can say that going with archiving after upgrade to ECC 6.0 system will be better with respect to archiving process.
    -Thanks,
    Ajay

  • SAP R/3 4.7 and ECC 5.0

    Hello MM gurus!
    i would like to know differences between SAP r/3 4.7 and ECC 5.0, and what makes the client to opt of the 4.7 or ECC 5.0.
    Thanks in Advance gurus.
    Regards,
    Pieadad.

    I am sorry for posting the question without searching properly. i got the answer for my question.
    Regards,
    Pieadad.

  • RFC connection BI and ECC 6.0

    Hi
    I am trying to connect BI and ECC 6.0 at home on two different virtual machines for data extraction and practicing delta management ( they are on the same virtual network).
    I am following these steps :
    Step-by-step procedure to connect BI with ECCu2026
    Define the logical system in R/3 using the transaction code SALE in both the systems (ECC and BI)
    Assign Logical System to a client using transaction code SCC4 in both the systems (ECC and BI)
    Setup the RFC Destination using transaction code SM59 in both the systems (ECC and BI)
    Hit Transaction BD64 and Click Create model view -  Enter the Short text u2013 Enter the Technical name  u2013 Hit Execute -  Distribution Model will be created and the technical name of the distribution model will be listed
    Place the cursor on model created and and click Add message type button on the top right corner
    Enter sender and receiver system IDs  and select the correct message type assigned to the correct system
    Distribute this model using Edit u2013 Model View u2013 Distribute
    Select the receiver of the model view and proceed to distribute the model
    Please note that the distribution of data model is not required to repeat in BI system as this step automatically replicates settings in BI
    You have to generate partner profile for each system with which your system communicate using BD82
    Outbound records are created in the partner profile for each outgoing message and inbound records are created for each incoming messages
    You can view the partner profiles generated using the transaction code WE20
    Message Types:
    RSRQST: This message type is send by BI to R/3 while loading any data. This gives information about the data source, selection condition and other BI settings to R/3.  As and when a load is started in BI, RSRQST message type is sent to R/3 requesting for data.
    RSINFO: Once R/3 receives RSRQST message from BI, it sends an acknowledgment message type to BI informing about the status of the request. That is whether the request can be handled or not by R/3. It also gives information about how many data packages are being send and what is the total number of records extracted for the given data source and selection.
    RSSEND: After sending a positive acknowledgement to BI, R/3 starts the extraction job and starts collecting data in data IDocs. This message type carries the actual data with it into the BI system.
    My question is that : Do i know need to create three model views for these three message types?? Are these steps sufficient?
    Please let me know if some other things needs to be followed or U know more simpler way to RFC connect so that I can pull data from ECC into BI and practice delta management.
    Thanks
    Edited by: max.sap on Apr 28, 2011 8:24 AM

    Hi Niru,
    Have you created a
    [RFC destination in NW Administrator?|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce10/helpdata/en/5a/97a066223e440b8ead3da027b17d9e/frameset.htm]. Have you created a [BI System connection?|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce10/helpdata/en/7e/6dbcea3700452195e3bddaa47c5906/frameset.htm]
    Best regards,
    Dharmi

  • Differences between SAP 4.7, SAP ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0

    Hello SAP Gurus,
    Could someone please let me explain, what are the main differences between SAP 4.7, SAP ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0.
    Thanks
    Sha

    Hi,
    Check in this link
    http://erp.fmpmedia.com/Default.aspx?alias=erp.fmpmedia.com/english

  • ABAP differences of SAP R/3 4.6 and ECC 6.0

    What are the ABAP differences of SAP R/3 4.6 and ECC 6.0?

    Hi
    Difference between version on functionalities you can find on the following link.
    Give the source version (i.e. 4.6 C) and select the target version (i.e. ECC 6.0)
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    Please check this Release notes :
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/43/6880cbb88f297ee10000000a422035/content.htm
    Check if this is helpfull
    Short Difference between R/3 4.7, ECC5 & ECC6 !!!!!
    1. SAP NetWeaver is SAP's technology platform. It has all of SAP's
    technology in it. It is used to build and run SAP Applications and customer
    applications (Application server, data warehouse, portal, coding, messaging,
    etc). You can find more information on the SAP NetWeaver page on the SAP
    Service Marketplace (http://service.sap.com/netweaver). Of course they is
    also in on the SAP NetWeaver page in SDN.
    2. ABAP is part of SAP NetWeaver. BW is part of SAP NetWeaver (as of
    the 3.5release).
    3. Prior to SAP NetWeaver, BW was a seperate product. It is shipped as part
    of SAP NetWeaver since the SAP NetWeaver '04 release (SAP NetWeaver BI 3.5).
    4. SAP ECC is part of the SAP ERP application (actually it is the minimal
    installation of SAP ERP). SAP ERP runs on SAP NetWeaver. So when you get SAP
    ERP you get SAP NetWeaver.
    - SAP ECC 5.0 is part of SAP ERP 2004 [which runs on SAP NetWeaver '04]
    - SAP ECC 6.0 is part of SAP ERP 6.0 (2005) [which runs on SAP
    NetWeaver 7.0(2004s)]
    5. SAP NetWeaver is delivered with SAP ERP so ABAP and the functional
    modules are include in SAP ERP.
    6. With SAP ERP (SAP ECC) you have a choice of activating BI within the SAP
    ERP system or deploying in a seperate system. This is information is in the
    SAP ERP master guides which can be found at
    http://service.sap.com/instguides.
    For SAP ERP 6.0 (ECC 6.0) it will the SAP NetWeaver 7.0 version of BI.
    Also check
    /thread/170347 [original link is broken]
    The only difference between ECC5 and ECC6 is that additional components like mySAPCRM, mySAPPLM, mySAPSCM, mySAPSRM are added in ECC6.0. HR was already a part of ECC5.0.
    http://abdurohman.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/whats-new-in-ecc5-and-ecc6-ecc7/
    Reward if usefull

  • Where is the transport files to enable BODS 4.2 and ECC 5 or earlier comunucation?

    Hello everyone.
    I am working on a project with SAP BODS 4.2, I need to extract information from SAP ECC 4.6, 5 and 6.
    The problem is that the directory where previously BODS versions used to put the transport file (.... \ SAP BusinessObjects \ Data Services \ admin \ R3_Functions) is only one transport, and the readme file has  the next sentence:
    "This document identifies the content of transport files provided with SAP BusinessObjects Data Services. These files use the SAP Correction and Transport System (CTS) to install the Data Services-provided functions.
    For detailed information about installing SAP functions provided by Data Services, see the SAP BusinessObjects Data Services Supplement for SAP.
    If you use a provided transport file, it loads the appropriate functions into a single function group /BODS/BODS, which is automatically created in your SAP system.
    SAP BASIS 4.6D or earlier: 900187.R22"
    Where to find the tranport for ECC version 5 or what is the solution?
    I have no problem for ECC version 6.0

    Dear Daniel,
    I think there will be compatibility issues with BODS 4.1 and ECC 5 or less version.
    I am assuming that for BODS 4.1 the ECC version has to be 6.0  version.
    Please confirm this details prior implementing
    Thanks & Regards

  • Options for loading data from legacy mainframe to SAP CRM and ECC

    Hello All,
    I am new to SAP.
    As part of data conversion planning from legacy mainframe to SAP CRM and ECC systems, I need to know the different tools available for loading the data and comparative analysis of the tools by showing the features. Please also describe the process to evaluate the tools (prototyping, technical discussions etc) and make the recommendations.
    I would also appreciate any information on testing tools like (eCATT) and any third party tools (like Informatica)
    I know I am asking for lot of things here. But, I really appreciate any information reagrding this.
    Thanks,
    Balu

    Hi
    Data Migration(Conversions) mainly involves the following Major Steps
    Discovery->Extract->Cleanse->Transform->Load
    Discovery-> Involves identifying various source systems available where the actual data is residing.
    Extract->Extract the data from the source systems(legacy systems)
    Cleanse->Cleanse the data by enriching it,De-duplications etc
    Transform->Transform the data into SAP Loadable format
    Load->Upload the data into SAP Using the Load Programs(Eg,BDC,LSMW,Data Transfer Workbench,BAPIs etc)
    Also i would request you to visit http://www.businessobjects.com/solutions/im/data_migration.asp
    Cheers,
    Hakim

  • BADI Differences between 4.7 and ecc 6

    Dear experts,
    Can any one tell me the differences in BADIs in 4.7 and in ECC 6.0
    Thanks in advance
    somesh

    Hi Venkat,
    SOURCE: difference between badis in 4.7 and ECC 6.0
    The u2018BADI-su2019 (Business Add-Ins), as they exist in pre NW04s releases are now called old classic-BADIu2019s (release 4.6 ). This was the first object-oriented way to enhance the ABAP system. This, to a certain extent, allows multiple implementations with limited filter support. The classic-BADIu2019s are implemented using ABAP Objects.
    With the introduction of Enhancement framework from E.C.C 6.0 a new BADI concept in additional to the old classical BADIs has evolved called as Kernel-BADI enhancement.
    The old classic-BADIu2019s are implemented purely at the ABAP Workbench level; that is, both the definition and implementation are realized as workbench repository objects (global classes and interfaces).
    The new Kernel-BADI takes it to the ABAP language level. Because of this, the new Kernel-BADIu2019s are much faster compared to the old classic-BADIu2019s.
    There are two new ABAP statements available now to support the Kernel-BADIu2019s, namely GET BADI and CALL BADI.
    Example:
    data bd_hdl type ref to badi_name.
    GET BADI bd_hdl filters filt_1 = u2018VALUEu2019.
    CALL BADI bd_hdl->method
    exporting param_1 = 10.
    The old classic-BADI used to mix both implementation selection and method call in the same CALL METHOD statement. The implementations could only be chosen at run-time because of the above reason and due to the fact that the BADI handle could only be gotten from another method call by passing the BADI name.
    Whereas in the new Kernel-BADI, the active BADI implementations are included into the load of BADI handle at compile time and the filter criterion are expanded as IF statements. This is the reason the new Kernel-BADIu2019s are much faster than classic-BADIu2019s.
    Some of the other new features of Kernel-BADIu2019s are,
    u2022 Improved Filters with complex filter condition editor
    u2022 Stateful BADI support and Context based lifetime control
    u2022 Possibility to inherit the implementations
    u2022 Switchable using Switch Framework 9
    Have A Nice Day
    Chaitanya.

Maybe you are looking for