Ericsson MD110 and Cisco routers ISDN PRI Q-Sig

Anybody has experience with MD110 and Cisco integration using ISDN PRI Q-Sig... Have problems with "idle-busy" channels on MD110. It looks like PBX does not recognize disconnect signal coming from the router.
Tks
Brani

MC,
Ericsson MD110, BC12 SP7
ROUTE CATEGORY DATA
ROU SEL TRM SERV NODG DIST DISL TRAF SIG BCAP
175 0110017500000010 5 3110000000 0 30 128 00080812 511110120031 111111
157 0110017500000010 5 3110000000 0 30 128 00080812 511110120031 111111
END
ROUTE DATA
ROU TYPE VARC VARI VARO FILTER
175 SL60 H'00000310 H'15420000 H'46300000 NO
157 SL60 H'00000310 H'15420000 H'46300000 NO
END
EXTERNAL DESTINATION ROUTE DATA
DEST DRN ROU CHO CUST ADC TRC SRT NUMACK PRE
175 175 1606100000000250006000000 0 1 0
157 1 2606100000000250006000000 0 1 0
END
Cisco IOS 12.3-3 (c2600-jsx-mz.123-3.bin)
Cisco config attached.....
Our serial links are satellite based so min delay is about 500ms
Tks
Brani

Similar Messages

Calling ID to PSTN with CME vs Ericsson MD110 and E1

Hi all,
We are having problems with calling party identification in the following scenario: some IP phones managed by a 2800 CME router. This is connected to an Ericsson MD110 PBX through a E1 with QSIG signalling. There is absolutely no problem when identifying both called and calling parties in both directions ingoing and outgoing from the router to the PBX private extensions. It also works fine when calling from the PSTN to direct public numbers redirected from the PBX to the IP phones extensions. However, when calling from these particular extensions, we want the calling party to identify with its particular public number, but instead it shows at the PSTN end with the main number of the ISDN jump group.
Anyone has experienced the same?
Thanks and regards,
Jose Soriano

Hi,
I'll try to be more clear. As I said, we have a CCME connected to an Ericsson MD100 via an E1 Qsig link. Then the MD110 goes to the PSTN also with an E1. The customer has several ISDN public numbers associated with that E1, one of them is the main ISDN group number, with which the originator of all the outgoig calls from the private numbers to the PSTN identify, except for some private extensions associated with one of the other direct public numbers: these can be reached directly through these numbers and also are identified with those numbers when calling to the PSTN.
Let's say we have 30 public numbers, from 555100 to 555129, beig 555100 the main number. Ext 101 is associated to public number 555101, and 102 with 555102. In the situation with no CCME, the call flow is as follows.
Private Ext. 101 (dials a public number) --> PBX EMD110 --> PSTN (displays 555101 as the caller ID)
PSTN dials 555101 --> PBX EMD100 --> Private Ext. 101
Now, let's include the CCME system. Let's say Ext. 102 is an IP Phone extension correctly routed between CCME and MD110. Also, ext. 102 should be identified to the PSTN as 555102.
Case A)
IP Phone 102 (dials a public number) --> CCME --> PBX EMD110 --> PSTN (displays 555100, and NOT 555102 as the caller ID)
Case B)
PSTN dials 555102 --> PBX EMD100 --> CCME --> IP Phone 102
The PRIVATE flow between CCME and MD110 is fine:
IP Phone 102 dials 101 --> CCME --> PBX EMD110 --> Private Ext 101 displays 102 as the CLID
Private Ext 101 dials 102--> PBX EMD100 --> CCME --> IP Phone 102, with 101 as the CLID
So, the problem is in what I called CASE A), calls do not idetify with the especific public number, but with the main group number when they are routed through the PSTN.
Regards,
Jose Soriano

Difference between setting up a vpn with windows 7 and cisco routers

Hi.I was wondering what the main difference Is between setting up a vpn with windows 7 or configuring It on cisco routers.
When you setup the vpn on windows 7 or xp do the client and server pc's take care of the encryption and decryption whereas configuring vpn on routers , the encryption and decryption Is done solely by the routers?
If I want to setup a connection where an IP In the same Internal lan Is assigned to the client pc I'm guessing I'd have to use a router configuration.
Thanks

Thank you for the response, lucky for me there was another option. Threatened to cancel with the ISP on the NAT side unless they assigned us a public static ip/gateway/subnet. They ended up doing that and the VPN connected as soon as the changes were made in the Linksys.

SBR and cisco routers/switches

HI all,
i have a juniper SBR and large no of cisco devices as RAS/NAS.
i would like to have level 1 team to have just read only profile .
and level 2 team to have read and write access . i guess to accomplish this on a non cisco aaa product ,
1) DO i need to downlaod cisco radius attribute dictonary file . if yes where is the downlaod link ?
2) As user profiles are basic one ., their should be a standard attribute which has this feature . in case this is true which ietf attribute i can use ?
3) what aer vsa ? does cisco vsa help me in accomplishing my goals with SBR?
4) if i get above answers i can move in right direction accompleshing the same with firewall vendor a , ssl vpn vendor b , wifi controller vendor c , dslamp vendor e ....
Any response will be much appreciated .

I have a 3750X and an SG300 trunked together and they are both running RSTP.
I set my 3750X to rapid-pvst
I set my SG300 to rstp
A "show spanning" on both devices yields: "Spanning tree enabled protocol rstp".
Both seem to be communicating STP fine.

Securing Telnet access on Cisco routers (access class)

Dear All,
In all my network i have cisco catalyst switch and cisco routers deployed in my WAN. In cisco routers, it was activated an ACL to secure telnet access to WAN devices. only 3 hosts (remote) were autorized to access these devises. I need to modify this secuirty to have access from the LAN (locally).
The ACL was implmented in all routers, and activated using access class in.
in there any idea without changing more the configuration and only tell the router to apply this ACL for WAN and not access for the LAN ?
Thanks for your help,
Best regards,

Hi,
here is the ip int brief.
thanks
CISCO1841#show ip int brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
FastEthernet0/0 192.168.1.1 YES NVRAM up up
FastEthernet0/1 192.168.2.1 YES NVRAM up up
ATM0/0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Dot11Radio0/1/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Dot11Radio0/1/0.1 192.168.2.129 YES NVRAM up up
Dot11Radio0/1/0.2 192.168.3.1 YES NVRAM up up
NVI0 unassigned NO unset up up
Virtual-Access1 unassigned YES unset up up
Dialer1 151.16.203.203 YES IPCP up up

Cisco 3845, h323-isdn pri, reverese caller id

Hello!
I run mixed voip network, with several h323-isdn pri gateways.
Some of these gateways are cisco, some asterisk.
I configured one of asterisk gateways according to
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+func+CONNECTEDLINE
so if I do call in following scheme:
PBX1--pri--asterisk1--h323--asterisk2--pri--PBX2
once PBX1 user accept call user on PBX receives user's name from PBX1.
but if I do call in
PBX1--pri--asterisk1--h323--cisco3845--pri--PBX2
There is no user name.
Asterisk sends name as informational element, I see it in traffic dump.
What I need to configure on cisco , so it will transfer this element to PBX2?
Thank you!

There doesn't seem to be a happy intersection between using MGCP to get access to caller name and SRST mode.
According to http://www.ciscotaccc.com/kaidara-advisor/voice/showcase?case=K32431525
Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) PRI backhaul does not support call preservation when transitioned from MGCP to Survivable Remote Site Telephony (SRST) or from SRST to MGCP."
Which is bad, because you don't want calls dropping in and out if the WAN link is bouncing. The solution according to the case is "Use H.323", but of course the issue there is that you lose the display name if it's in the facility and not the display field.
It would be nice if it could at least be "lazy", so that the router would either wait until there was no call activity, or at least schedulable / forceable so that you can control what's happening.

The difference of the IEEE802.1x Auth between Cisco Routers and Catalyst switches

Hello
I am investigating the difference of the IEEE802.1x Auth between Routers and Switches.
Basically dot1x auth is availlable on Catalyst Switches. however if I want to check to
PortBased Multi-Auth , MAC address Auth and any certification Auth with this feature,
Is it possible to integrate into Cisco Router such as Cisco 891F ?
In my opinion Cisco891F is also available to use basic IEEE802.1x but if it compares with Catalyst switches such as Cat3560X
I think there might be any unsupported feature on Cisco 891F.
I appreciate any information. thank you very much in advance.
Best Regards,
Masanobu Hiyoshi

Many time in interviews asked comaprison between cisco routers and switches that i was answerless bcoz i dont have much knowledge about that.Can anyone provide me the compariosin sheet of the same.how are the cisco devices differ with each other how much Bandwidth each routres support and Etc...
Ummmm ... The most common question I get is "what is the difference between a router and a switch".
However, if you get a question like this, then my impression to this line of questioning are:
1. The candidate they are looking for has in-depth knowledge of routers and switches. And I mean IN-DEPTH!;
2. They are not looking for a candidate. They just want to stroke their ego. There is not alot of people who can give you the "names and numbers" of routers and switches at a snap of a finger. And if you do happen to know the answer, then and there, then expect a tougher follow-up question.

Ask the Expert: Packet Capture Capabilities of Cisco Routers and Switches

With Rahul Rammanohar
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about packet capture capabilities of Cisco routers and switches.
In May 2013, we created a video that included packet capture capabilities across multiple Cisco routers and switches. For each product, we began with a discussion about the theory of the capabilities, followed by an explanation of the commands, and we concluded with a demo on real devices. In this Ask the Expert event, you’re encouraged to ask questions about the packet capture capabilities of these Cisco devices:
•       7600/6500: mini protocol analyzer (MPA), ELAM, and Netdr
•       ASR9k: network processor capture
•       7200/ISRs: embedded packet capture
•       Cisco Nexus 7K, 5K, and 3K: Ethanalyzer
•       Cisco Nexus 7K: ELAM
•       CRS: show captured packets
•       ASR1K: embedded packet capture
More Information
Blog URL: Packet Capture Capabilities of Cisco Routers and Switches
Watch the Video: https://supportforums.cisco.com/videos/6226
Hitesh Kumar is a customer support engineer in the High-Touch Technical Services team at Cisco specializing in routing protocols. He has been supporting major service providers and enterprise customers in routing, Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS), multicast, and Layer 2 VPN (L2VPN) issues on routing platforms for more than three years. He has more than six years of experience in the IT industry and holds a CCIE certification (number 38757) in service.
Rahul Rammanohar is a technical leader with the High-Touch Technical Support Team in India. He handles escalations in the area of routing protocols and large-scale architectures for devices running Cisco IOS, IOS-XR, and IOS-XE Software. He has been supporting major service providers and large enterprise customers for routing, MPLS, multicast, and L2VPN issues on all routing platforms. He has more than 13 years of experience and holds a CCIE certification (number 13015) in routing/switching and service provider.
Remember to use the rating system to let Hitesh and Rahul know if you have received an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Hitesh and Rahul might not be able to answer each question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Service Provider, sub-community forum shortly after the event. This event lasts through November 1, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.

Hello Erick
    Thanks for the topology. The trigger will be different for labelled packet as you would need to mention the values of labels too in the trigger.
     Below are two examples of one or two labels being used, it depends on where you are capturing the packet in mplsvpn scenario which will decide teh number of labels being imposed on the packet.
Trigger for one label. (if the router on which you are capturing the packet PHP is being performed)
VPN label - 5678
Source Address - 111.111.111.111
Destination Address - 123.123.123.123
show platform capture elam trigger dbus others if data = 0 0 0 0x88470162 0xE0000000 0 0 0x00006F6F 0x6F6F 7B7B 0x7B7B0000 [ 0 0 0 0xffffffff 0xf0000000 0 0 0x0000ffff 0xffffffff 0xffff0000 ]
Trigger for two labels. (for other core routers)
IGP label - 1234
VPN label - 5678
Source Address - 111.111.111.111
Destination Address - 123.123.123.123
show platform capture elam trigger dbus others if data = 0 0 0 0x8847004D 0x20000162 0xE0000000 0 0 0x00006F6F 0x6F6F7B7B 0x7B7B0000 [ 0 0 0 0xffffffff 0xf000ffff 0xf0000000 0 0 0x0000ffff 0xffffffff 0xffff0000 ]
    You can check the labels being used (by using show ip cef <> details) and covert their values to hex and change the trigger accordingly.
     I have changed the colors for better understanding. If you notice carefully in the trigger the values for ip address, labels have just been converted to their respective hex values which could be replaced.
     Please let me know if this helps.
Thanks & Regards
Hitesh & Rahul

Implementing WAAS using 3925 and 2911 Cisco routers

Dear all,
I am new to Cisco WAAS and therefore I would like to request some help regarding the following scenario:
I have a star network (1 hub and 5 spoke) topology where each satellite site is connected via a 2 MB (symmetric) to the Head-Quarters (Central node). In order to be able to concentrate all servers (services) at the head-quarters and improve the users experience in remote sites when accessing network services that are located at the head-quarters we want to implement Cisco WAAS instead of increasing the existing bandwidth.
At the head-quarters we are using a 3925 Cisco router and at the remote locations we are using 2911 Cisco routers. Last but not least there will be approximately 75 concurrent users from remote sites accessing resources at the head-quarters.
Currently I am planning to use the following:
·At the head-quarters I am planning to use a Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) Module: SM-SRE-900-K9 with an Enterprise license (for large deployment) in the Cisco router 3925
·At the remote sites I am planning to use a Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) Module: SM-SRE-700-K9 with an Enterprise license (for medium deployment) in the Cisco router 2911
Is there anything else that I am missing or need to take into consideration for deploying the WAAS.
Regards,
Screech

Hi Screech,
Answers:
Is the dedicated WAE hw for central management purpose a required component?not required as WAEs can optimize even without Cntral managementbut you will not be able to collect statistics, reports and will have to manage WAEs from CLI. This a kind of highly recommended management piece you will need.
What is the difference between using a full blown WAE instead of a Sm SRE module: Using a fully blown WAE at DC is recommended as you are then avoiding couple of bottlenecks.
1. Bandwidth allcoation
2. SM / NM models have low capacity, disks where as fully blown models like 674s have 10k/15k SATA / SAS drives.
3. HW redundancy: you have backup PS / HD in dedicated WAEs in msot of the models.
4. HW dependency: Your SM moduels depened upon your router / switch. If for some reason, switch or router goes down, SM moule goes down at same time.
5. Additional NICs / HW availability.
There are various other reasons you might want to consider. You can ask your cisco sales engineer or one of the PDI help engineer on the forum can also punch in here.
but basicaly, I would go for fully blown WAE on DC side and central management piece as well.
Regards.

Cisco 871 and 881 routers PCI Compliant?

do you know if the Cisco 871 and 881 routers are PCI complaint for 2015 and if not, are they able to be updated to be PCI Compliant?
thanks,
I am a Franchisee for a pizza chain and they are stating the routers will not be compliant with the new credit card PCI standards.

Any router can be PCI complaint as long you follow the PCI guide to harden the router and apply the correct filters.For example; one of the PCI requirement is to disable telnet access to the router and only use SSH. So, this can easily be accomplished if you have the right IOS with security installed.
HTH

No carrier from PVDM2-36DM via ISDN PRI link

The network topology is
Modem --> [FXS][cisco 2821][E1] --> ISDN PRI --> [E1][cisco 2811][PVDM2-36DM]
ISDN PRI link is operated correctly, debug isdn q931 shows that connection is established. Info message is
*Jul 23 06:27:45.407: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface Serial1/0:1 is now connected to 555 N/A
Unfortunately, no carrier signal is going from modem to line.
Configuration of Cisco Routers is below.
1st (2821)
==========
controller E1 0/2/0
framing NO-CRC4
pri-group timeslots 1-2,16
interface Serial0/2/0:15
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-qsig
isdn incoming-voice modem
no cdp enable
dial-peer voice 1 pots
destination-pattern 555
port 0/3/0
voice-port 0/3/0
cptone RU
dial-peer voice 888 pots
destination-pattern .T
port 0/2/0:15
2nd (2811)
==========
controller E1 1/0
framing NO-CRC4
pri-group timeslots 1-2,16
interface Serial1/0:15
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-qsig
isdn timer T310 120000
isdn not-end-to-end 64
isdn protocol-emulate network
isdn incoming-voice modem
no cdp enable
line 0/322 0/357
modem InOut

> The PVDM2-DM works only with NM-xT1/E1.
Yes, of course, it is well known fact. We are using NM-1CE1T1-PRI. See "show diag" output below.
Slot 0:
C2811 Motherboard with 2FE and integrated VPN Port adapter, 2 ports
Port adapter is analyzed
Port adapter insertion time unknown
EEPROM contents at hardware discovery:
PCB Serial Number : FOC11070F5L
Hardware Revision : 1.0
Top Assy. Part Number : 800-26920-03
Board Revision : A0
Deviation Number : 0
Fab Version : 03
RMA Test History : 00
RMA Number : 0-0-0-0
RMA History : 00
Processor type : 87
Hardware date code : 20070214
Chassis Serial Number : FHK1109U00A
Chassis MAC Address : 001b.2aa3.c1c8
MAC Address block size : 24
CLEI Code : COM7C00ARA
Product (FRU) Number : CISCO2811
Part Number : 73-10258-04
Version Identifier : V04
EEPROM format version 4
EEPROM contents (hex):
0x00: 04 FF C1 8B 46 4F 43 31 31 30 37 30 46 35 4C 40
0x10: 03 E7 41 01 00 C0 46 03 20 00 69 28 03 42 41 30
0x20: 88 00 00 00 00 02 03 03 00 81 00 00 00 00 04 00
0x30: 09 87 83 01 32 3F 46 C2 8B 46 48 4B 31 31 30 39
0x40: 55 30 30 41 C3 06 00 1B 2A A3 C1 C8 43 00 18 C6
0x50: 8A 43 4F 4D 37 43 30 30 41 52 41 CB 8F 43 49 53
0x60: 43 4F 32 38 31 31 20 20 20 20 20 20 82 49 28 12
0x70: 04 89 56 30 34 20 D9 02 40 C1 FF FF FF FF FF FF
PVDM Slot 0:
36 port PVDMII digital modem PVDM daughter card
Hardware Revision : 1.0
Part Number : 73-10102-03
Board Revision : C0
Deviation Number : 0
Fab Version : 03
PCB Serial Number : FOC10354YRW
RMA Test History : 00
RMA Number : 0-0-0-0
RMA History : 00
Processor type : 00
Product (FRU) Number : PVDM2-36DM
Version Identifier : V01
EEPROM format version 4
EEPROM contents (hex):
0x00: 04 FF 40 04 90 41 01 00 82 49 27 76 03 42 43 30
0x10: 88 00 00 00 00 02 03 C1 8B 46 4F 43 31 30 33 35
0x20: 34 59 52 57 03 00 81 00 00 00 00 04 00 09 00 CB
0x30: 8A 50 56 44 4D 32 2D 33 36 44 4D 89 56 30 31 20
0x40: D9 02 40 C1 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x50: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
Slot 1:
NM-1CE1T1_PRI Port adapter, 1 port
Port adapter is analyzed
Port adapter insertion time unknown
EEPROM contents at hardware discovery:
Hardware Revision : 1.0
Top Assy. Part Number : 800-21550-02
Board Revision : A0
Deviation Number : 0-0
Fab Version : 03
PCB Serial Number : FOC104753CA
RMA Test History : 00
RMA Number : 0-0-0-0
RMA History : 00
Fab Part Number : 28-5935-03
Manufacturing Test Data : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Field Diagnostics Data : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Product (FRU) Number : NM-1CE1T1-PRI
Version Identifier : V01
EEPROM format version 4
EEPROM contents (hex):
0x00: 04 FF 40 03 9D 41 01 00 C0 46 03 20 00 54 2E 02
0x10: 42 41 30 80 00 00 00 00 02 03 C1 8B 46 4F 43 31
0x20: 30 34 37 35 33 43 41 03 00 81 00 00 00 00 04 00
0x30: 85 1C 17 2F 03 C4 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 C5
0x40: 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CB 8D 4E 4D 2D 31 43
0x50: 45 31 54 31 2D 50 52 49 89 56 30 31 20 FF FF FF
0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

ISDN PRI dialer connections to AS5300

Swapping out an AS5200 running 11.3 with an AS5300 running 12.3. Copied the same config from the 5200 to the 5300. ISDN Pri calls from remote routers to the 5200 connect and stay connected. Calls from the same router to the 5300 disconnect after 1 sec. Q931 debug shows x8090 disconnect code being sent from the 5300. Suspect AAA auth issue because I don't see any attempts logged in tacacs server (CiscoSecure). When I debug ppp auth the only thing out of the ordinary is a "PPP Authorization Required" message but the AAA author configs are the same on both 5200 and 5300. When I run a debug on tacacs on the 5300 I see "pass" statuses coming back from the server.

Use below commands to troubleshoot.
â¢ debug isdn q931 - To check ISDN connections as outbound calls are initiated.
â¢ debug ppp negotiation - To see if a client is passing PPP negotiation. A high number of concurrent PPP negotiations can overwhelm the router CPU.
â¢ debug ppp authentication - To see if a client is passing authentication. If you are using a version prior to Cisco IOS release 11.2, use the debug ppp chap command instead.
â¢ debug ppp error - To display protocol errors and error statistics associated with PPP connection negotiation and operation.

Why do we need to assign ip for the D channel ISDN-PRI

Why do we need to assign ip address to the D channel (signaling ) when we configure ISDN-PRI in the example below :
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/ap/ap_ts3/ap_ts3sw/apswisd.htm
<quote>
Step 1:Specify the D channel of the first Primary Rate Interface (PRI):
AS01(config)# interface Serial 0:23
AS01(config-if)#
Step 2: Assign an IP address and subnet mask to the interface:
AS01(config-if)# ip address 172.16.254.253
</quote>
Regards

You can assing one there, and / or on dialer interfaces. It depends on what you are doing.
These will be the address used by PPP when it runs on the B-channels.

Cisco Call Manager 5.1 and Cisco VoIP Gateways

Hi,
I have Cisco Call Manager 5.1 with Cisco 2800 series routers as a ISDN gateways and Cisco VG224/ATA 186 as POTS gateways. While Cisco Call Manager collects call statistics from 7900 series SCCP handsets managed by the Call Manager (number of VoIP packets, dropped frames etc.), it shows only one side of the call as it does not collect statistics from the Cisco routers (configured as H.323 gateways), the Cisco VG224 (with ports configured as H.323 gateways and as a SCCP devices) and Cisco ATA 186 (configured for SCCP).
Is the collection of these statistics possible? What needs to be done?
Thanks,
Paul

Update: Logging of QoS/Call Management Records (CMR) to Call Manager CDR database is not possible with H.323 gateways; only MGCP gateways:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_qanda_item09186a008020650a.shtml#qa4
Anyone know how to get the Cisco router gateway to log these statistics anyway using standard router logging mechanisms (e.g. syslog)?
Anyone know about calls to SCCP ports on Cisco VG224 or ATA 186?
Thanks,
Paul

ISDN PRI Configuration errors

Dears,
I trying to configure a ISDN PRI on a 1751-V router and the following error occur:
CISCO_BARR(config-controller)#pri-group time 1-6
%Controller tdm clock does not have data capability
%Insufficient HDLC resource for pri-group - it has been removed
How do I to configure ISDN PRI in that router ?
More information:
Cisco 1751-V
Router Version: c1700-ipvoice-mz.123-9d.bin

Hi,
Please make sure that you putting the T1/E1 card in the WVIC and not VIC slot as PRI can do
voice but it is still considedred as data, so if you try to confiugre this in a slot that
is VIC (instead of VWIC) only then it will not work for you. Furthermore, you needed to
have the tdm clock command set to both and not just voice, as you are creating a PRI,
which, again, is Data, but can do voice too.
here is the example of command :--
tdm clock T1 2/0 both export line
hth
CJ

Ericsson MD110 and Cisco routers ISDN PRI Q-Sig

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for