Error: Consolidated companies DCIUS and ' ' are different

Hi All,
When I try to post vendor invoice in FB60 I get the above given error . Message No. F5080.
I have created a group company and assigned to the expense GL account master in trading partner field.
GL is mapped to the group GL account.
No error is shown if I enter the group company id in the vendor master in the "trading partner" field.
But the vendor is not a cross company. My understanding is, we use the trading partner field in vendor master only if the vendor is an affiliated company.
What could be the reason for the error and how can I resolve this ?
Thanks
Anil

Hi Murali,
Thanks for your reply.
1. This is not an inter co postings. So I don't find any need to activate the same in doc type.
2. The error is shown only when I remove trading partner from vendor master (vendor is not a cross company).
3. Consolidation is required. But I have given the trading partner and group GL in all the GL accounts.
So I am at a loss why this error occurs.
Thanks
Anil

Similar Messages

  • Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different

    Hi team,
    While clearing TDS Salary GL system showing below error
    Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different
         Message no. F5080
    Diagnosis
         The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected
         document type for all line items. In this case at least two different
         companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does
         not belong to a company are stated.
    Procedure
         If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a
         document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please
         correct the entered account.
    Actually what we done..........
    1) In salary entry which was passed by HR payroll, we have distributed cost from company Code-2011 to another company code-5011.
    2) Manse some staff in 2011 cost booked in another company code 5011.
    3) in that way system passed automatic inter-company transaction, which is correct.
    5) but while doing clearing of inter company GLs & other accounts wherever these type of document selected then system throwing above error.
    Please guide use.

    Hi
    Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
    The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
    Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
    Regardss
    Michael

  • Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Can anyone tell me the how to solve this error "Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different"  which I am getting in F-04
    Thanks,
    Madan

    Hi
    Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
    The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
    Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
    Regardss
    Michael

  • Error through F-44 that  Consolidated  companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Dear Expert
    At the time of Vendor clearing through F-44 I get the
    warning message that "Withholding tax information ignored"
    where Withholding tax related customization and master has
    been updated accordingly. If I ignore the same warning
    and save the document as my all Debit and Credit transactions
    are of equal amount ,i m getting the error that "Consolidated
    companies 1000 and ' ' are different.
    What specific setting is required for the same.
    Thanks in advance
    VG

    Hi,
    If you are getting error F5 080 then most probably this is because one of the documents to be cleared contains a different trading partner (field BSEG-VBUND).
    Please check the contents of each customer/vendor line item concerning this field. The field can be viewed on the customer/vendor line item via button 'more data'. If the contents is different you have either to clear the items individually or you have to change the settings of the document type used for clearing.  You can find out what document type is used for clearing in OBXH in the 'transfer with postings section'.  Afterwards you can go to OBA7 and mark the flags 'Inter-company postings' and 'Enter trading partner'.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Consolidated companies 1000, 1500 are different

    hi ,
    when tried to do PGI(post goods issue) i am getting the below error
    "consolidated companies (1000, 1500) are different ".
    please suggest me .
    regards,
    deepa

    PGI is the point where FI entries related to goods getting delivered are genereated.
    Normally Finished Goods and Cost of Goods Sold GL of the same comapny are hit.
    I guess in the particular case Finished Goods GL of one company code and cost of goods sold of different company is getting hit.
    Thanks,
    Ashish

  • Consalidated companies 0 and are different

    Hello Experts,
    When I am processing with f-06 am getting the error consolidate companies 0 and ' ' are different.This is happening when it is with more than one customer.I have gone through some threads in forum but it is all about vendor and document type,but in my case it is when i use multiple customer.Please explain as to how i will proceed with that.
    Thanks

    Hello Binoj,
    The message number is f5080
    Diagnosis
    The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two differen companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
    Procedure
    If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.

  • F.13 clearing SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5  080 Consolidated companies UTCL and '

    Hi All
    I am getting the following error message while clearing customer transactions through F.13 and F-32
    SAPMF05A 0131 S    F5  074 2 items were selected
    SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5  080 Consolidated companies UTCL and ' ' are different
    anyone can help in this?
    rgds/Reddy
    Edited by: kpkreddy on Aug 30, 2010 1:55 PM

    Hi Reddy,
    Please check the document type used in OBXH and select UMBUCHNG check for document type assigned there defalut is AB
    ensure document type AB have Inter-company posting checked in OBA7
    Edited by: Ravi Rana on Aug 30, 2010 2:15 PM

  • F-04 posting error - Consolidated companies

    Dear all,
    I have a error message for a particular customer while posting using T Code - F-04, I got an error message saying - " Consolidated Companies XXXX & "" are different.
    Samunder Singh

    HI,
    Can u explain the Scenerio for which your working, whether ur using Cosolidation for all company codes.
    Regards,
    Sreekanth

  • F5080 error: Consolidated Companies & and & are different - HR

    Hi Experts
    We are trying to post the payroll and error F5080 comes up.  It refers to Trading partner and / or Intercompany posting which I have set  in the document type.  I have searched the net and OSS, but can't find a solution for HR.
    Can anyone please help?
    Kind regards
    Dawn

    Hi,
    For that Document Type, in control data- uncheck intercopany postings

  • F.13 Consolidated companies " " and " " are different

    Hello gurus,
    I have seen many threads on this, but I have yet to find one to answer my particular issue. 
    When we run F.13, we are getting the error message stated in the subject line above.  We are using two document types here:
    WE:  Goods receipt
    RE:  Incoming invoice
    I have checked the document types in OBA7, and both have been flagged to "Allow Inter-company posting" and "Enter Trading Partner".
    I have checked the Master data for the vendor and the trading partner field is filled in.  I can not clear out this field, since it is used for some of our quarterly reporting.
    When I go into FBL3N to look at the item lines, I am seeing that the items lines with document type WE (goods receipt) is pulling the number in the master data in to the trading partner field.  This is correct.
    However, when I look in FBL3N at the item lines with document type RE (incoming invoice) the trading partner field is blank.  We enter out invoices via MIRO. 
    Does anyone know why the "RE" document is not pulling in the trading partner number?
    Thanks for your help,
    Rhonda

    Hello Dominic,
    Here is how I have the document types configured:
    WE: (Goods receipt), has the "Allow inter-company posting" flagged on.  Plus, the posted document has the trading partner displayed.
    RE: (Incoming invoice), has the "Allow inter-company posting" flagged off.  Plus, the posted document does not have the trading partner dispalyed.
    So, it matches your train of thought in above response.  However, I am still getting the same error on the pre-existing documents.
    Then I have tried every other combination between the two document types and I keep getting the same error.  The pre-existing documents will not clear.
    Is there a way to update the trading partner field in the pre-existing documents?
    Sorry for all the questions.
    I really appreciate all that you have done for me.
    Thank you so much for your help,
    Rhonda

  • GRIR clearing: Different consolidation companies?

    Hi All,
    While trying to clear the GRIR account manually, I was trying to match two line items from one document to another document. They balance however, I'm not able to clear these as I get the following error:
    'Consolidated companies WE1LC and ' ' are different"
    I don't know Consolidation well, so it will be helpful if someone can tell me what to do and help me with how Consolidation is to be done.
    Thanks,
    Tejas

    Thanks Sridhar! It worked!

  • Consolidated companies are different

    Hi,
    User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as consolidated companies are different. pls suggest.
    Regards,
    venki

    Hi,
    User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as "consolidated companies xxxx and " are different". pls suggest.
    Regards,
    venki

  • SEM-BCS how to make Consolidation Unit with Business Area

    Hi all,
    I am newbie in SEM-BCS and implementing BW-based BCS. Our situation is as follows.
    Situation
    - we have 7 companies worldwide and 4 different Business areas.
       Every company consists of at least two business areas in R/3.
    - we have sales transaction in FI among companies.
    requirement
    - we need consolidated F/S in whole consolidation group and consolidated F/S in Business area level.
    actually, we are planning to make the consolidation unit in company level.
    Do we have to break down consolidation unit in business area? or just breakdown category solves our requirement?
    If we have sales transaction even between business areas within certain company, do we have to make it in business area?

    Following are the answer to your questions…
    Q:   What to do for using this cube in BCS?
    A:    Add the business area to the cube. Generate the data basis and the business area gets added to all ODS/DSO , virtual cube.
    Suggestion: To avoid deleting the Profit center cube, since you can reduce the complication.
    Q:   Is it the problem about DATA BASIS Role?
    A:   No. Assign the role of subassignment or consolidation unit as needed. If you are giving the role of consolidation unit to business area, you need to insert the char Partner business area also in the cube.
    Q:   Is there some materials to solve this situation?
    A:   Refer the matrix consolidation material in help.sap.com from BCS portion.  As per SAP literature any relevant object can be made as second consolidation unit such as business area, functional area etc. Don’t fear. Once you start it the issue will be resolved in few days.
    Expected complication:
    If you are going to make business area as subassignment then it is simple. But if you are making business area as Consolidation unit, go for partner business area in cube.
    Ensure with your BI consultant that all BCS messages are addressed in BI infoobject for business area specifically.
    Things can get complicated only if we allow for it get complicated. But you are doing great.. Keep  posted.. Good luck.!!!..

  • Lightroom has crashed with error message 'error reading from its preview cache' - this happens every time i try a launch it. I have looked a forum to repair the fault. there are different recommedations.can you tell me step by step how to recify  this pro

    lightroom has crashed with error message 'error reading from its preview cache' - this happens every time i try a launch it. I have looked a forum to repair the fault. there are different recommedations.can you tell me step by step how to recify  this problem. i can not find ircat ir data etc  in the programme files. Thanks

    robmac76 wrote:
    can you tell me step by step how to recify  this problem.
    Yes:
    Step 1: Delete the preview cache.
    That's it!
    So, the trick is to find the preview cache.
    This document gives location:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/preference-file-locations-lightroom-41.html
    To be clear: it's a folder in with your catalog and you want to delete the whole folder but nothing else.
    If your catalog file path is "X:\My Catalogs\My Catalog.lrcat", then the preview cache "folder" will be:
    X:\My Catalogs\My Catalog Previews.lrdata
    So the trick is to find your catalog file, and since Lr won't open your catalog and run, you can't use it to find out.
    But you should be able to find it by searching your disks for *.lrcat files - do you know how to do that?
    Which OS?
    If you know the name of the catalog it will help, but also: it's probably NOT in with your program files.
    UPDATE: The above-mentioned document gives default name and location for preview cache, so if you haven't overridden the default, it should be right where that document said it would be - is it? (of course you need to know your user name too, but presumably you do, no?).
    R

  • Error in ME51N -  Account object functional area differs from asset master

    We are in the middle of going thru an upgrade -
    Funds & Functional Area were display fields in the old system but it was recetly changed to required fields in the Asset Master Record (AS01). Now when I try to create a Purchase Requisition for procuring the asset, I get this error - We are in the middle of going thru an upgrade -
    Funds & Functional Area were display fields in the old system but it was recetly changed to required fields in the Asset Master Record (AS01). Now when I try to create a Purchase Requisition for procuring the asset, I get this error - Account object functional area differs from that in asset master record. Any suggestions?. Any suggestions?

    The functional area what is comming is not the same in Asset accounting as you get from ME51N.
    What functional area you get from ME51N and what is the asset.
    Is the functinal area in the cost center not the same as you filled in the asset?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Reporting Studio in 11.1.2

    Hi All I can now get into reporting studio in 11.1.2 QA and can open a report. If have the Preview User Point of View option in workspace set to Yes, which I always do, I get the list of dimensions to choose members for whenever the report is run. If

  • How to get DATETIME value in a page?

    Hi, I have two pages. In page1, I have a table that contain MessageStyleText item(AuditTime) and the attribute data type is DATETIME . I want to pass AuditTime value from page1 to page2. I am passing the AuditTime value from page1 to page2 using Dest

  • TEHO not working

    Hi, I have a problem with TEHO and SIPTRUNK. The scenario is an AVAYA using  a SIP Trunk connected to a CME connected to the PSTN over QSIG E1. Calls from the AVAYA to any IP Phone on the CME are working fine. Calls from the IP Phones on the CME to t

  • XI Adapter Illegal count value 0

    Hi all, When configuring the PI Adapter to connect for outbound messaging from MDM, we are receiving the following error: Illegal Count Value 0 This error is in the Component Monitoring. Looking in the logs, this seems to be occuring because of the e

  • Paste / Move issue in all Android file manager ports

    So as everyone here knows a proper file manager is a must for every single OS and the PB doesn't pack one out of the box. Air Browser seems to be the only free native one but it doesn't allow to browse outside "/accounts/1000/ shared" and the UI coul