Error in Code Inspector-while checking syntax in TR

Hi,
I am getting a error in code inspector:
Table 'Table_name' sub-object type TABL sub-object name 'table_name'
Buffering type is initial but delivery class is "C".
How to avoid this?
Thanks.

Please check the" technical setting" of the table mentioned using SE11 and make it "fully buffered"
a®

Similar Messages

Select query gives error in Code inspector and extended program check

Hi,
I have a query .
SELECT pernr
FROM pa9100
INTO TABLE t_nca_tab
WHERE endda EQ c_date AND
z_nca_required EQ c_yes.
This query gives me an error in Code inspector like :
Large table pa0001: No first field of table index in WHERE condition
I have one more query that gives error in extended program check
SELECT SINGLE stell ename
      INTO (g_stell, g_name)
      FROM pa0001
      WHERE pernr EQ wa_nca_tab-pernr AND
            endda EQ c_date.
The warning says:
*In "SELECT SINGLE ...", the WHERE condition for the key field "SEQNR" does not
test for equality. Therefore, the single record in question may not be unique.*
Its too urgent.
Please reply.
Regards,
Binay.

The first field is PERNR .. so if UR not giving pernr it will fetch
all the data from the said table and between the given dates ..
Check if this is your requirement ...
write the select as ...
where r_pernr is a range ...
SELECT pernr
FROM pa9100
INTO TABLE t_nca_tab
WHERE pernr in r_pernr <----
             endda EQ c_date AND
             z_nca_required EQ c_yes.
As UR using select single it's expecting to use all the key
fields in the where condition ...
U can ignore this warning message

Hi, After migration of smart form into adobe form, while checking( syntax )

hi,
After migration of smart form into adobe form, while checking( syntax ) the error message will be displayed like the Sender Country is not filled. if i fill the sender country then only the adobe form activate but no sender country is provided in smart form. how can we rectify this problem in migration of smart form into adobe forms ( Address node ).
sender country is not mandatory in smart form but comes into adobe form it is mandatory. How can we handle this type of issues.
Thanks&regards,
Ashok Reddy

I too have the same query..to check Adobe form after migrating from smartform.
Can anybody answer in this regard?
Thanks in advance..

Code Inspector / Extended Check - Error in Inbound Custom Function Module

I have created a new cutom FM for Inbound IDOC Application Posting.
In the TABLE   Parameter of FM the following Tables difined.
IDOC_CONTRL                     LIKE     EDIDC
IDOC_DATA                     LIKE     EDIDD
IDOC_STATUS                     LIKE     BDIDOCSTAT
RETURN_VARIABLES     LIKE     BDWFRETVAR
SERIALIZATION_INFO     LIKE     BDI_SER
while checking with Code Inspector Tool I got an Error for BDI_SER.( Last Table Parameter of the FM)
Syntax check warning
"BDI_SER" can be enhanced. After a structure enhancement, the semantics of the
parameter transfer may change.
Internal Message Code: MESSAGE G_B
(The message can be hidden with "#EC ENHOK)
Type "BDI_SER" or the type of one of its subcomponents can be enhanced. The semantics of the parameter transfer may change after a structure enhancement.
For the execution of a Remote Function Call (RFC), the actual parameter and formal parameter do not have to be of the same type. In the case of structure types, the actual parameter and formal parameter can contain additional components at the end. These additional components are set to their initial values.
Check whether the enhancement category of the relevant type correct is set or whether the category "cannot be enhanced" should be used.
How to fix this error? other wise how to supress the Message by adding "#EC ENHOK
where I have to add the Comment "#EC ENHOK.
please help to give details .
Thanks in advance.
Shar

In the source code you will have this in comment right, use the "#EC ENHOK.

Code Inspector/ATC checks for VKOS/VKOI object types

Dear Experts,
I found a strange behavior while executing CI checks on a transport request. TR contained only IMG Activity objects (Object Type VKOS/VKOI). After CI checks it gave errors "Recognized dead code". There is no coding for these kind of object type, I don't know where it was able to find the dead code. On debugging I found that, it is trying to populate Program name concatenatinv " SAPIC " and the object type. ( SAPICVKO). But there is no such program existing. It then gives "Recognized dead code" error.
Has anyone faced such error before? I guess this is error in the standard program.
Thank you.

Other language NUnit test frameworks similar to ABAP Unit (AUnit) commonly have project extensions for storing test results. These are useful for the unit level regression (did a new change break any existing functions). History of test results, help narrow down the nature of a current failure by answering the question of 'When did this break?' or when did it last pass? In systems dependent upon outside components the history can provide a pattern for occasional failures due to factors outside the system under test.
I see that ABAP unit test results can be added into the Code Inspector under the Check Variant.
1. Is it common or recomended to use the Code Inspector (SCI) to store AUnit test results?
2. Is it common or recomended to use Code Inspector Object variants to collect individual AUnit tests for a regresssion style 'TestSuite'?
3. What reporting or tools exists for Code Inspector history?
4. Is Application Logging the better spot for AUnit results history?
(also posted on the wiki.. apologies - I'm new to the forum and wiki)
Will Loew-Blosser

Customizing the code inspector with check for two executable statements in same line

Hi Everyone,
I have a reuirement to customize the code inspector.I need to create a check 'Two executable statements should not be in the same line'.
While doing so i am facing one problem as in internal table it is capturing the report as word by word with same row number nd different line number.
If anyone have worked on this before then help me out.
I am using CL_CI_TEST_SCAN as superclass and making the changes in the run method.
Regards,
Khushboo

In the source code you will have this in comment right, use the "#EC ENHOK.

Error in code inspector

Hi Abapers,
I have done recording for Tcode:pa30 in my report and used call transaction method. because of this i'm getting one error in when i check code inspector.
error message:
CA CL_CI_TEST_CRITICAL_STATEMENTS0002
Critical Statements
Call of Transaction &1
&1 = Name of Transaction
For CALL TRANSACTION there must already be a suitable transaction authorization with the calling transaction.
Kindly help me out to fix this error.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Goto SE24
enter this class CL_CI_TEST_CRITICAL_STATEMENTS
and see its documentation.
It shows the all critical errors that are there in code.
Regards
Anji

Field Label error in code inspector

Hello ,
I am working in release 6.0 . An i tring to release one transport
Code inspector is giving following error on screens .
"Field label has a fixed font instead of proportional font
When I press on info button i got following message
A field name that has the attribute "Equidistant font" was found. Field names should all be output in proportional font.
Procedure
Correct the "Equidistant" flag for this field in the Screen Painter.
Do you know how we can correct Equidistant flag ?
Please advice
Krsto

You get this error because one of the labels have the "Fixed Font" set and the visible length is less than the default length.
You can find all this fields on the properties of the label.
To avoid this warning, set the visible length as the default length.
Regards,
Naimesh Patel

Regarding code inspector performance check

Hi all,
we encountered the following issue in code inspector
the parameter e_t_range is an internal table . and is tranferred as a value in general, this combination does not perform well.it appears to be no tranfer . use reference transfer.
we are writing the code in function module and the e_t_range is one of the importing parameter of function module.
we are appending the output to e_t_range (table). we r getting the output.
but we r getting the following performance issue in code inspector.
please respond to this issue immediately awaiting for reply.its very urgent********

hi,
U r passing Table1 by pass by value which will pass table1 with its contents into another same table type tabel2. the calculation of FM will be done on tale2 not in table1.after getting some calculation into FM tbale 2 will be passed to table1.
Now if u r passing table by pass by reference then it will pass a address of table1 to FM and within FM's calculation original table1 will get changed directly by using passed address without using another table.
now in pass by value it uses two internal table thats why it gives performance issue. but yes as said above in RFC u will have to use Pass by value options.
regards,
SKumar

Error in Code?-PlZ Check This

Hai,
We are getting an error in this code.We are beginners in Flex.
Can anyone help us?
This is our code....
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" layout="absolute" creationComplete="init()">
<mx:Script>
    <![CDATA[
        import flash.media.Camera;
        import flash.media.Microphone;
        private function init():void
            cam.dataProvider=Camera.names;
            mic.dataProvider=Microphone.names;
        private function send():void
            //var camera:Camera=Camera.getCamera();
            var micro:Microphone=Microphone.getMicrophone();
            micro.addEventListener(StatusEvent.STATUS, this.onMicStatus);
            private function onMicstatus(event:StatusEvent):void
                if(event.code == "Microphone.Unmuted")
                    trace("Microphone access allowed");
                else if(event.code == "Microphone.Muted")
                    trace("Microphone access denied");
    ]]>
</mx:Script>
    <mx:Panel x="265" y="50" width="294" height="200" layout="absolute">
        <mx:VideoDisplay x="0" y="0" width="274" height="160"/>
    </mx:Panel>
    <mx:Button x="381.5" y="314" label="Start" click="send()"/>
    <mx:Text x="281" y="24" text="Username" id="uname"/>
    <mx:TextArea x="351" y="24" height="18" width="150"/>
    <mx:Text x="281" y="260" text="Camera" width="62"/>
    <mx:ComboBox x="351" y="258" width="191" id="cam"></mx:ComboBox>
    <mx:Label x="273" y="286" text="microphone"/>
    <mx:ComboBox x="351" y="284" width="191" id="mic"></mx:ComboBox>
</mx:Application>
ERROR:-
1013: The private attribute may be used only on class property definitions.    videovoice/src    videovoice.mxml    line 23    1267425378537    662

First of all, check Permit Debugging in publish settings so you can at least reference a line number. It's not very realistic to post 150 lines of code, and say guys can you check this.
Anyway from a cursory glance it looks like you only create 27 bricks:
for (var i=0; i<9; i++)
for (var j=0; j<3; j++)
bricks = new brick(i,j);
Brick_Array.push(bricks);
And then later you do this:
for (var k=0; k<100; k++)
if (Ball.hitTestObject(Brick_Array[k]))
You don't have 100 bricks in Brick_Array.
Also - as a matter of convention variables names should not have the first letter capitalized - that is for class naming.

Error in sales order while checking preview

Dear all,
I have attached the same billing plan to the sales document type & the item category. The item category is for third party. "The billing plan is a milestone billing plan". I created the sales order & entered all details
Sold to party
Ship to party
Material
Quantity
I checked at the header level & the billing plan was determined
I checked at the item level & the same billing plan was determined. There was a tick also on "header billing plan". "The sales order is not yet saved".
When i click on "preview" icon to see the output, the system pops up a message box saying "maintain billing plan for sales document type or item category".
When i click on exit in the message box, the system takes me out of the sales order.
Then I tried out creating the same sales order & i saved it. In the change mode whn i clicked on "preview" to see the output, the system displayed the output without any message.
Please guide me as to why the system is not allowing to see the output in the create mode of the sales order.
With best regards,
Allabaqsh G. Patil

Hi,
Everything is assigned properly. The same billing plan has been assigned to the Sales document as well as the item category. But still when i click on the preview, the system throws an error "maintain billing plan type for sales document type or item category". The date proposal has also been maintained for the billing plan.
Actually this error only comes in the Create mode of the sales order. When I save the sales order & in the change mode when i check the preview, the error does not come.
Please guide me as to what can be the root cause for the error in the create mode........checking the preview is the routine work of the end user to check the accuracy of the sales order before saving it.
Thanks & regards,
Allabaqsh G. Patil.

Code Inspector Error Code MESSAGEG_H

Hello Guys,
I'm running code inspector and in Syntax check/Generation and subdivision suspect conversions, am getting an error called "Truncation in the Conversion from ABAP type 'C'(length 64 ->20).
While I understand what the error is about...i don't want to modify the code. Is there any workaround like putiing some "EC Check" at the end of the line so as to hide that error.
Thanks a lot.
Karthikeyan

If the error can be hidden, the pseudo comment would be provided in the Code Inspector screen only.
Click the documentation button (the blue "i" button) & see if there are any pseudo comments to hide the error.
BR,
Suhas

Code Inspector Errors during Upgrade?

Hi,
We are moving from 4.7 to Netweaver 7 . During the upgrade we found there are errors using Code inspector, Please confirm me that whether errors coming thru Code inspector , whether we need to correct these?
But the programs have no syntax errors, all programs compiled properly.
Thanks
Sa_R

Hi,
Its not required to resolve all of them, they will be arranges as Errors, Warnings etc.
So try to resolve the Errors.
Each error has how it can be solved some times they will give you options to hidethe rros by putting some comments on the perticular line.
Regards,
Sesh

Code inspector problem

Hi all,
I'm checking the syntax before to release my order requests and I have several errors in code inspector.
Ok, I've fixed these errors. The problem is if I execute the code inspector again the errors are displayed again... but the code is ok, there are no errors.
It happened to me a lot of times, with several object types, may be the next day if I pass the code inspector the errors dissapears or may be not.
It's very strange. I've tried with other users, doing log off and login again... but nothing...
Do you know if exits some transaction code for "refresh" the code inspector? the buffer or something?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
I've worked with code inspector quite a lot and I've never spoted this kind of problem. I would suspect that this is not code inspector problem but rather something is wrong with your repository objects.
If I were you I would try to debug code inspector. There is somewhere inside SCAN ABAP-SOURCE command used. Check what input is being used.
BR
Marcin Cholewczuk

ABAP Code Inspector & Security

All:
I am currently looking into the Code Inspector that is built into SAP that allows developers to run test/checks on their code related to performance, syntax, and as noted "security". I am trying to track down what exactly the "security" is being checked. I am running tests on my internal SAP systems to see how it acts, but I wanted to get any feedback from the security community on a few things
1) What "security" checks does the Code Inspector actual check for?
2) Is there an location with updated documentation from SAP (not dated 2002) which speaks to the security componet, not just mentioned it?
3) Any useful use-cases within the security community that your organization/clients are using?
Thanks,
Matt Urban

Hi,
if you display a check variant in SCI there is info linked to each node (icon with I). For example calling C-routine is a security risk. Also dynamic statements are good example of security risk. You need to validate input properly before executing dynamic statement. Not sure about documentation but documentation available in SCI seems OK to me.
On one project we used SCI to check any custom development (not only security). It helped us to increase quality of custom development. Especially, with less skilled developers.
Cheers

Error in Code Inspector-while checking syntax in TR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for