Error in MIRO for input tax calculation
HI Gurus,
We are facing problem at the time of logistic invoice verification in case of purchase orders with account assignments. Following is the set-up for executing MIRO:
1. Purchase Order with (PO no. 4700000010)
1.1. Account assignment category.
1.2. Tax code.
2. Goods Receipt MIGO
3. Vendor Invoice booking MIRO
After doing about mentioned steps, document created at the MIGO step shows correct liability and Asset / Expense a/c.
At the time of vendor invoice verification (MIRO), system picks up only CST condition for vendor liability and non deductible excise conditions are reversed against the asset/expenses. For E.G.
1. PO created
Basic amount 100.00
+ Basic Excise (16%) 16.00 (non-deductible)
+ Ecess (02%) 00.32 (non-deductible)
+ Hcess (01%) 00.16 (non-deductible)
+ CST (03%) 03.49 (non-deductible)
119.97
2. MIGO Transaction
Asset / Expenses A/c -
Dr 119.97
To Prov. For Liability 119.97
3. MIRO Transaction
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr 119.97
To Vendor a/c. 103.97
To Asset / Expenses a/c 16.00
(16.00 Basic excise duty)
At the time of MIRO, it should had posted
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr 119.97
To Vendor a/c. 119.97
In case Pos without account assignment all accounting entry are posting correctly.
Kindly provide suitable solution ASAP.
Thanks in advance
Hi All,
Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
Entry is generated
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax Dr. 25.50
Vendor Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
Vendor Cr. 11.25 (10% split on total amount)
Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax Dr. 25.50
Vendor Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
Vendor Cr. 10 (10% split)
Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
How to do this in system?
Thanks,
Pushkar
Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM
Similar Messages
-
Incorrect field KNA1-STCEG in output list for input tax Line items-RFUMSV00
Hi all,
I found the incorrect field in RFUMSV00 - Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases. If you want to configure the output list for Input tax: Line items, there is the field VAT Registration No. which has to be LFA1-STCEG, but there is incorrect field KNA1-STCEG. After that I cannot find the values for this field in my output.
In the output list for Output tax: Line items there is correct field in configuration /LFA1-STCEG/.
I tried to find some SAP notes but without avail.
Thanks for help.
MiroslavHi,
Please check the following OSS note:-
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=736203
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=640269
It is picked up from bseg-stceg and not from lfa1-stceg or kna1-stceg
Regards,
Gaurav -
While creating VK11 for output tax error should be ther for input tax codes
Hi all,
while creating condition record VK11 for output tax ,in condition record only output tax code should be possible ,if they use any input tax code then error messsage should come or system should not allow to create.how we do this.
Thanks in Advance,
BalaHi Jelena Perfiljeva ,
Thanks for the Reply
Its JIVP,JIVC , VAT condition types (India). -
ERROR DURING MIRO FOR IMPORT P.O.
Dear All ,
i m doing MIRO for import P.O , here i m doing MIRO for CVD (in USD) only , but as i m about to post the I.V an error arise as -->"Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
Message no. FF713
But in FTXP i have checked that V0 ( input tax ) is maintained here , pl help what else i have to check to resolve the issue .
sap11Maintain the missing entry with the transaction OBQ2:
Access sequences - mark 'MWST', pushbutton 'Accesses'.
Maintain the new entry on the screen 'Accesses' for the access sequence 'MWST':
AcNo. = 10, Tab = 3 (Tax code), Requirement = is blank,
Exclusive = not active.
The following should be displayed as fields for the access to MWST and table 3:
Condition, Doc.struc., Doc.field, Long key word, Direct value I
ALAND KOMK ALAND Country (blank) (blank)
MWSKZ KOMP MWSKZ Tax code (blank) (blank)
OR
OSS Note 504400
You enter a document with Transaction MIRO, with reference to a multiple account assigned purchase order. Different control indicators are entered in the account assignment items. The document contains unplanned additional costs which are distributed to the individual account assignment items. The system displays error message: FF713 'Tax code & country & does not exist in procedure &'.
Other terms
MIR7, multiple account assignment, T169P, MR1M
Reason and Prerequisites
The problem is caused by a program error.
Solution
Corrected for Release 4.7 and included in R/3 Support Package for Release 4.0B, 4.5B, 4.6B and 4.6C. Advance correction: See the "Corrections" section. -
ERROR DURING MIRO FOR PLANNED DLV. COST.
Dear All,
pl help me out i have to do MIRO for a P.O for
planned delivery cost but here an error is occurred as ---> Error in account determination: table T030K key 1000 JI6 V0Message no. FF709
Diagnosis
In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing for taxes on sales/purchases.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
sap11Hi
Please check the account settings for the tax code.
in FTXP put your tax code , country key. In the details select the line in which rate is maintained & click on Tax Accounts
If no account is maintained, Maintain the same .
You can also maintain the tax accounts in T.code OB40 under the Acct key used such as VST, MWS etc... whcih you hyave assigned to the Condition types in the Taxcing procedure.
In OB40 maintain the Tax code & Tax account.
Thanks & Regards
KK -
MIRO: Changes in tax calculation
Dear Experts,
My requirement is regarding tax calculations (Basic Excise Duty, Edu. cess, Higher Edu. Cess) in MIRO transaction. We calculate all these duties in this transaction with a taxed code which is based on fixed percentages for combination of tax code and condition record. We manually capture and post all these duties in J1IEX transaction based on the given percentages like 12% , 2%, 1%. The requirement is like, in some cases the user will have to capture and post duties in J1IEX transaction not based on the fixed percentages 12%,2%,1%. These duties could be any figures as provided by the dealer/supplier. As these duties are not based on the fixed percentages, we cannot define a combination of tax code and condition record to be used in MIRO transaction. In this case, the tax/duty calculated in MIRO transaction should get matched with figures already posted in J1IEX transaction. Is there any configuration which could do so.
Someone please shade light on this.
Thanks & Regards,
Aniruddha MahalleDear Anirudha,
If the user has entered the excise values manually means ZERO tax code is used in PO, then while entering the details in J1IEX the user has to check the MRP indicator in miscellaneous tab. When the MRP indicator is ticked in J1IEX then when the user enters MIRO on checking the calculate tax code and using the zero tax code(Tax code which is used in PO) the tax values are automatically calculated.
Many threads are already available in SCN.
Role of MRP Indicator regarding Excise Part in GR or in J1IEX
Excise Duty Pass on Scenario
Regards,
Bhanu -
CO OBJECT ERROR IN MIRO FOR UNPLANNED DEL COST
Dear Friends
I m facing one error in MIRO can u guide me in that context.
well in MIRO i m postin Unplanned deliver cost.......and it is asking me assignment to this G/L for Cost center object..
ERROR: Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object
..I have already assigned the Cost center for the G/l in OKB9 is there anything else has to be done
Actually we have 4 plants and 4 Business area i.e whenever i am doing any posting for BW01 -and Business Area BA01 My cost center BW01402 will get hit similarly for other plant and Business are Cost center has been assigned in OKB9 in Details per business Area,is it the right method or anything else has to be done.
Actually in OKB9 i have maintained that GL and in Detail per business area i have maintained cost center per business area
we have assigned the right Cost senter only i.e for different Plant and differenct business area we have asigned different cost center.
Then y i m getting error i m not understanding..
Please guide me in this context.
Also i am trying other method of posting Freight (unplanned delviery cost ) as well as labour charge through ACTIVATING -"Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
So that for particular G/L I can Debt or credit that account,in which will doing MIRO G/L Tab gets activated ,i m entering G/L and entering amount for freight and Labor is this the correct procedure.
Regards
shaileshI have already assigned this G/L as primary cost element in FS00 and in OKB9 also Cost center is assigned as per Business Area as mentioned in the thread
i.e we have 4 plants and 4 business area so we assigned 4 cost centers to 4 business area, so whenver i m postin unplanned delivery cost for a particular plant then my GL should hit with proper cost center but still it is asking for CO OBJECT
ERROR IS:
"Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object"
If i maintained the default Cost center in FS00 in cost element then it doesnt give error but my requirement is that for a particular plant ,and business are only cost area assigned to it should hit
Any other solutions.
Thankz and regards
Shailesh -
Hi guru
Tax structure for the catering services shall be Service [email protected]% for 50% of the order value and [email protected]% on 60% of the order value. The illustration is as follows.
Qty Value Amount
620 14 8680
2868 5.5 15774
675 33 22275
TOTAL 46729
Add 50% Service tax at 12.36% 2887.85
Sub Total 49616.85
Vat 60% on Composition
Amount @12.5% 3504.68
Grand total 53121.53
Now how to define this struture in SAP
Thanks
ShivajiHi
In TAXINN
For service tax instead of entering 12.36% in FV11 enter 6.18% which will be equal to service tax for 50% of the base amount.
For VAT instead of entering 12.5% in FV11 enter 7.5% which will be equal to VAT for 60% of the base amount.
Bcoz in FV11 we have option to say the % of tax and it always takes for 100% of base amount and so this could be the workaround.
For withholding taxes we have an option to say the % of base amount for calculation.
Also we can use the change tax base amount option but it needs changes in the taxing procedure and this option is usually not used for Indian scenarios. Complicated as well.
Chk and revert.
Reg
Raja -
How to input Projects for Input Tax in AP Invoice
Hi Experts,
I am trying to maintain a Balance Sheet wherein for each account I have to state the corresponding Project Code. When creating an AP Invoice, the Input Tax Account does not automatically carries the Project Code with it. I already encode the Project Code in Row details as well as in Accounting Tab of the AP Invoice. Still, the automatic tax code does not show the Project Code in the Journal Entry Preview.
Can you help me with this?
Thanks in advance.
Arlenehi
check bellow query
SELECT T1.[AcctName],(sum(T0.[Debit])-sum(T0.[Credit])) "Cumulative Balances",T0.[Project] FROM JDT1 T0 INNER JOIN OACT T1 ON T0.Account = T1.AcctCode WHERE T1.[AcctName] =[%0] AND T0.[refdate] >= [%1] AND T0.[refdate] <= [%2] GROUP BY T0.[Project],T1.[AcctName]
the above query output balance is not assigned any project then open GL Account and update it -
Error during MIRO for tax code .
Dear All ,
User is doing MIRO but an error comes as " Tax code V0 does not exist in TAXINN " , here i need to tell u that what had happened that in P.O the material is not charged with any tax , so user have given tax code as V0 , but he had forgotten to maintain cond for BED non cenvatable % so he had made the cond. record in FV11 , Here my querry is that during MIRO the tax code V0 without cond record gives error from where the system is not capable to fetch the data ?
OR is there any check so that in such cond. the error should be like this " No cond record is maintained for V0." instaed of
" Tax code V0 does not existsin TAXINN "
Rgds
sap12U need the user should assign tax code V0 for non-taxable materials.
Error what it giving is correct. U should assign this V0 to ur tax Procedure TAXINN.
Path to Assign
Spro - IMG - Financial Accounting(New) - FA Global settings - Tax on Sales/ Purchase - Calculation - Taxcodes for Tax-Excempt Sales.
Procedure - TaxCode - Reason
If ur not able to solve the problem, Send me ur requrement clearly.
Subramanian.R -
Error in MIRO for amount split
Hi All,
When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
Pleas tell me where the problem is.
Thanks,
PushkarHi All,
Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
Entry is generated
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax Dr. 25.50
Vendor Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
Vendor Cr. 11.25 (10% split on total amount)
Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax Dr. 25.50
Vendor Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
Vendor Cr. 10 (10% split)
Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
How to do this in system?
Thanks,
Pushkar
Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM -
Error in mapping for floating Number calculation
Hi All,
I have a small doubt in floating number calculation in Mapping.
Actually i am geting a floating point number and calculating the SUM and generating the output. The input is of 2 decimal places(Ex: 26.02 and 26.03 ), but when it is adding all the values it is generating a three digit decimal number (Ex: 52.050003)
I dont know from where it is geting one extra number "2" in the output.
Please find the code for the same and let me know if i need to do something else to get ride of this.
//write your code here
float sum=0;
if(a != null && a.length > 0.00)
for ( int j =0; j<a.length;j++)
sum = sum + Float.parseFloat(a[j]);
result.addValue(String.valueOf(sum));
else
result.addValue("0");
Thanks in Advance,
JAYJay,
Please use the below code and let us know, if it helps.
BigDecimal sum= new BigDecimal("0");
BigDecimal bd;
if(a != null && a.length > 0.00)
for ( int j =0; j<a.length;j++)
bd=new BigDecimal(a[j]);
sum=sum.add(bd);
result.addValue(""+sum+"");
else
result.addValue("0");
in import section - java.math.*;
raj.
Edited by: Raj on Feb 18, 2008 11:11 AM -
Quality Inspection Error in MIRO for Invoice Verfication
Hi Every Body,
Actually we are able to pass the invoice for UD quantities (except Rejected quantities) after final inspection .Its ok and standard but we face the problem where we have to return the rejected goods for the vendors separately
And we mapped the process for return the goods with separate return PO and pass the credit memo for vendor billing so for return we pass separate entries that 's why intially we need to pass 100% invoice (not only for accepted quantites) but here system does not allow to pass whole , 100% quantities invoice , please suggest me some way how we pass for whole quantities invoice verification and can remove here quallity inspection error..
Thanks,
DharmveerWithdrawn
-
Rouding Difference error in MIRO for Local currency
Hi Gurus,
While posting invoice in MIRO, PO currency is EUR, system is showing correct balance in document currency but in local currency system is showing difference of .01 cents and not allowing to post.
How to recitify this issue?
Please revert asap.
RegardsHi,
Try setting Tolerance limit in OMR6
If you want to round off the Values in the amount field at the time of invoice posting in MIRO. There will be a small difference amount positive or negative in the Balance field. System does not automatically round off the values. It is manually rounding only.
Maintain the Tolerance key DIF for the Company code . Maintain the Tolerance values says + or - .50 INR in OMR6. & select the Check limit boxes
Regards
KK -
Error in miro for freight vendor while STO
Hi expert
I am making payment to freight vendor and adding unplan delivery cost at the time of simulation i am getting Error " Balance in transaction currency Message no. F5702.
i am making payment to vendor for my Stock transfer order
Regard
NAbilAt the vendor level, have you entered the same amount as the expense line item. Both should match for the invoice to be posted and updated in FI
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, what do you explain it seems to be almost the same as mi case. iMAC with anything conected : no problems. All tests, onyx,.....all OK! If I conect my scanner and/or my USB_extHD and/or my HP laserjet .... then in any moment my iMAC hangs on color
-
My original eMac came with the Jaguar 10.2 installed (and included the eMac 10.2 installation discs). I have since upgraded as far as 10.2.8, but am considering upgrading to 10.3+ (possibly 10.4+ eventually). Would I still be able to keep the Apple O
-
Hi, I am working on a Weblogic portal application (Weblogic 10.3.2) to be deployed in a Weblogic Server 10.3.2. I want to enable case insensitive user name login for my application. Looks like by defaule user name goes for a case sensitive authentica
-
Missing Files Images Grey Box with ?
I have a large document that I am putting in many screenshots. I use the standard format (picture1, picture2, etc), then drag and drop them to my document. This has worked fine overall but yesterday I opened my file and received the error message tha
-
My 500mhz. dual processor G4(revision B) came with 2 40 gig IDE hard drives installed. They're piggy-back installed in the botton right side of the bottom of the G4 case with a 2-input ribbon cable that connects to the motherboard right next to it. I