Error in MIRO

Hi
While posting MIRO, we are getting the following error-
" Tax Code V1 Country IN does not exist in Tax Procedure ZAXINN".
We are on version 4.7, using TAXINN as the tax procedure. We have maintained the condition types as well as assigned the tax code to Country IN.
Thanks in advance
Hrishi

Hi,
Assign calculation procedure to country
Please follow below path
Spro-F.A/C-F.A/C globale settings- tax on sales/purchases- basic settings- assign country to cal proc
If it is usefull assign points
Thanks
chiru

Similar Messages

Tax error in MIRO

Hi,
I am getting tax error in MIRO while posting transaction. "tax amount must not be greater than the tax base" msg FF747.
Invoice amount is 168.91(MIRO)
PO amount is 55.17
Tax amount is 113.74
This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
tax amount is greater than due to heavy import duty. User wants to post greater tax amount than actual PO amount, could you please suggest how can it be possible to post in SAP, i am trying to post but i am getting above error.
This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
Thanks,
Sam.

Hi Sam,
I too have the same kind of scenario. The VAT value is more than the base amount. Please inform me the solution applied by you.
Thanks in advance,
Pravin.

Error in MIRO transaction

hi,
I am getting following error in MIRO transaction ....Can anybody please fix this ?
"In company code 3000, the number range 51 is missing for the year 2008"
Regards
Vijay

HI,
Please check the nuber ranges whether that has been selected as external for the Invoicing.
If external then please check whether the said no range starting from 51 is included in the external no assignment or no?
If not then yiu may have to add the same no range and then check.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Prasanna
Award pls if helpful.

Error In MIRO GL account allows only output tax

Hello All,
We are facing an error in MIRO that GL account xxxxx allows only out put tax. The scinario & settings are as below.
FB60
There is no error when using the particular tax code sytem posts the document
MIRO
Same vendor & tax code used as in FB60
The systemshows an error that GL ***** allows only output tax.
TAX CODE settings in FTXP
The GL showing error is in tax code
GL settings
In GL master data in control tab , the tax category is defined as out put tax
QUERY
Why in FB60 it allows the GL & not in MIRO ( Both are vendor invoice and suppose to work in similar manner)
please note in both the cases the entries are same
Vendor Cr
Expense / Stock Dr
VAT GL **** Cr
VAT GL-2 Dr
VAT GL**** is not picking @ MIRO & Picks @ FB60 with out any error
Any Idea !!!
Thanks & Regards
Arun R

Hi,
The problem is resolved .
The error was due to the fact that the VAT was an aquisiton tax for europe.
The details are in note 373587
Thanks for the support
Regards
Arun

CO OBJECT ERROR IN MIRO FOR UNPLANNED DEL COST

Dear Friends
I m facing one error in MIRO can u guide me in that context.
well in MIRO i m postin Unplanned deliver cost.......and it is asking me assignment to this G/L for Cost center object..
ERROR: Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object
..I have already assigned the Cost center for the G/l in OKB9 is there anything else has to be done
Actually we have 4 plants and 4 Business area i.e whenever i am doing any posting for BW01 -and Business Area BA01 My cost center BW01402 will get hit similarly for other plant and Business are Cost center has been assigned in OKB9 in Details per business Area,is it the right method or anything else has to be done.
Actually in OKB9 i have maintained that GL and in Detail per business area i have maintained cost center per business area
we have assigned the right Cost senter only i.e for different Plant and differenct business area we have asigned different cost center.
Then y i m getting error i m not understanding..
Please guide me in this context.
Also i am trying other method of posting Freight (unplanned delviery cost ) as well as labour charge through ACTIVATING -"Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
So that for particular G/L I can Debt or credit that account,in which will doing MIRO G/L Tab gets activated ,i m entering G/L and entering amount for freight and Labor is this the correct procedure.
Regards
shailesh

I have already assigned this G/L as primary cost element in FS00 and in OKB9 also Cost center is assigned as per Business Area as mentioned in the thread
i.e we have 4 plants and 4 business area so we assigned 4 cost centers to 4 business area, so whenver i m postin unplanned delivery cost for a particular plant then my GL should hit with proper cost center but still it is asking for CO OBJECT
ERROR IS:
"Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object"
If i maintained the default Cost center in FS00 in cost element then it doesnt give error but my requirement is that for a particular plant ,and business are only cost area assigned to it should hit
Any other solutions.
Thankz and regards
Shailesh

Message 8I 478 error at MIRO

Hi Experts,
We are facing a very strange problem with the message control 8I 478 as an error at MIRO with different behavior in different servers.
In dev the same scenario with same message control the message is not triggering and taxes also calculating but in PRD the message is coming error.
Scenario:
PO-Dealer scenario--qty 100
VL31N-100 qty
J1IEX_C with MRP indicator for 100 qty(Mat type raw material)
MIGO-90 qty
Then again with J1IEX_P part 2 posted for 90 qty.
doc status in tables J_1IGRXREF-posted,J_1IEXCDTL-in process,J_1IEXCHDR-in process.
Now at MIRO in Dev server taxes are getting calculated with proper tax code and part 2 posting not yet done error is not appearing(8I-478).
Same scenario in PRD at MIRO error part 2 posting not yet done is coming for 8I-478, message control are same in both the servers.
Kindly suggest.
Regards

If the issue is not happening in DEV, then ask your MM / FI consultant to compare both DEV and PRD. I feel, some MM/FI related setting is missing and hence the issue.
You may also have a look at the following OSS notes
Note 1535398 - 8I478 error when invoice is posted for service PO in MIRO
Note 591587 - Message 8i478 appears even though Part II is posted
G. Lakshmipathi

Strange error in MIRO

Hi Experts,
I m facing a strange error in MIRO.
I have created a PO in Co code A100 for vendor XYZ.
The goods are received against this PO.
But when the accounts payable accountant tried to book the invoice, he selected the PO, but the strange thing happened is Vendor ABC appeared.
When I have created this PO for Vendor XYZ and done MIGO for this then why some different vendor ABC is appearing in MIR7 for the same PO.
Why is this happening? pls giude me in which areas I need to look to reach to the root of this problem.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
go4S

Hi Chandramohan, Mainpal
Thanks for valuable replies.
I have checked the Partner functions for both Vendors. Vendor ABC is not created as invoicing party for Vendor XYZ.
I have even checked the company code, MIR7 is done for the same Co code for which the PO is created.
Any more inputs will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
go4s

Error in MIRO: FF744

Hello Gurus-
We are receiving an error in MIRO 'Jurisdiction codes 1400000000 and 1800000000 have different cash discount base control'
In checking the forum, I found a similiar post and the solution to was to update OBCP but when I go to this transaction, there is nothing to update.
We are on ECC 6.0 and on Vertex.
Any insight will be greatly appreciated!

Hi,
Check if your customizing is correctly set in transactions
OB70, OBY6, OY01.
Also review F1 online help of field 'Discount base amount is the net
value' and notes 514938, 300253 and 872130.
Additionally, review following comments:
<1> if the flag of Activate Plants Abroad is activated, then
'Discount Base Net' in transaction OY01 for the concerned company code
must be ticked, otherwise, system will use gross amount as cash discount
base.
<2>if the flag of Activate Plants Abroad is not activated, then system
will read settings in OB70, if 'Disc Base Nt' flag is set, then system
will use net amount as "ash discount base".
See also note 882132.
I hope I could be of assistance.
Regards,
Fernando Evangelista

Cost center error in miro

Hey experts... when the user is running miro .. he gets the error like cost element requires a co assignment(KI235)... we made a config for particular element in okb9 which is based on business area vise... but still its getting error in miro.. please help me solve the issue

hey dev thankss for the reply... i am posting three screenshots

Error in MIRO for input tax calculation

HI Gurus,
We are facing problem at the time of logistic invoice verification in case of purchase orders with account assignments. Following is the set-up for executing MIRO:
1.     Purchase Order with (PO no. 4700000010)
1.1.     Account assignment category.
1.2.     Tax code.
2.     Goods Receipt MIGO
3.     Vendor Invoice booking MIRO
After doing about mentioned steps, document created at the MIGO step shows correct liability and Asset / Expense a/c.
At the time of vendor invoice verification (MIRO), system picks up only CST condition for vendor liability and non deductible excise conditions are reversed against the asset/expenses. For E.G.
1. PO created
Basic amount                   100.00
+ Basic Excise (16%)        16.00 (non-deductible)
+ Ecess             (02%)       00.32 (non-deductible)
+ Hcess             (01%)       00.16 (non-deductible)
+ CST                (03%)       03.49 (non-deductible)
                   119.97
2. MIGO Transaction
Asset / Expenses A/c -
Dr        119.97
To Prov. For Liability                          119.97
3. MIRO Transaction
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr   119.97
To Vendor a/c.                                       103.97
To Asset / Expenses a/c                           16.00
(16.00 Basic excise duty)
At the time of MIRO, it should had posted
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr   119.97
To Vendor a/c.                                       119.97
In case Pos without account assignment all accounting entry are posting correctly.
Kindly provide suitable solution ASAP.
Thanks in advance

Hi All,
Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
Entry is generated
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax     Dr.    25.50
Vendor          Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
Vendor          Cr.   11.25 (10% split on total amount)
Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax     Dr.    25.50
Vendor          Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
Vendor          Cr.   10 (10% split)
Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
How to do this in system?
Thanks,
Pushkar
Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM

Runtime error in MIRO while using User/Screen exit

Hello,
I have implemented an exit in ABAP for MIRO which when transported to Quality server through runtime error.
I have used EXIT (SMOD) : LFDCB001 which contains FM -> EXIT_SAPLFDCB_001 and include -> ZXM08U31. In this exit I have written my code to disable Inv. Party field. This field exist in Details Tab in Miro Transaction.
Location of the field: MIRO -> Details (tab) -> Inv. Party (Field)
Code written in include ZXM08U31 is:
LOOP AT SCREEN.
IF screen-name = 'INVFO-LIFRE'.
    screen-input = 0.
    MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
This exit is assigned to a project in CMOD and I tested the same in Development system. It is working perfectly.
Now I transported the TR (Includes program ZXM08U31 and Customer enhancement projects ZMIRO). Now when I run MIRO in quality server it triggers the my logic and then through runtime error.
Runtime error says:
Short text
    Dynpro does not exist
Error analysis
    The system attempted to use dynpro 0400 in program "SAPLXM08".
    This dynpro does not exist.
I agree that screen 400 does not exists in program for MIRO but it does not exists in development system as well. So if the runtime error is valid in QEC server then why not in DEV server. And when it can run successfully in DEV server why cant it run in QEC server.
Hope I have explained all the things in detail.
Please provide me the solution since user can bombard anytime for the MIRO dump everytime in QEC.
Regards,
Harjeet Grover

Hi Harjeet,
Reason of your Dump is that the enhancement "LFDCB001" which you used contains one Function module exit "EXIT_SAPLFDCB_001" and another one screen exit in calling screen "SAPLFDCB" number 0150.
So when you activate your project these above mentioned both components were activated.
So when you execute transaction SAP looks for called screen "SAPLXM08" No-0400 but as you havn't created and program go for DUMP.
Solution - Just Create called screen "SAPLXM08" No-0400 and activate.
Thanks,
Vijay

Error during MIRO of an Asset

Hi,
Please help me solve our problems regarding MIRO of an asset.
The asset was received via MIGO last 12/27/2007. Depreciation cost was already posted for Dec2007~Feb2008. When user about to post the MIRO the error NAF5354 appear, "account yyyyy in company code xxxx cannot be directly posted to.." yyyyy is marked as recon account for account type A..
Using similar SAP transactional procedures on other assets received in 2008 and MIRO in 2008 using same GL account was posted successfully.
What seems to be the issue here? How can we proceed for the invoice verification?
Hoping for immediate advise.
Regards,

Hi, thanks for the response. I already checked the FS00 of the concerned G/L. The post automatically checkbox is unchecked since the G/L acct creation.
MIRO is working for those asset that were GR/IR on 2008. For this case, it was GR 2007 and to be IR on 2008.
FIscal year already change.
Does it have to do with fiscal year change and the asset already have posted depreciated cost before it was IR?
Thanks in advance,
Ely

Error while MIRO posting: Unique co code has not been assigned to co number

Hi all
I am getting the following error while posting MIRO-
"A unique co code has not been assigned to co no". I think this might have to do something with CO no range. Is it so. Does any1 have any idea what this could be because of?
Thxs in advance
Hrishi

Hi Vishnu
Thxs for ur immediate reply. But cross co conttrolling is not active in my case. The error diagnosis reads as follows-
Doc breakdown is active in ur system. In certain cases, a co code is derieved frm the Co ID no and this must lead to the assignment of a unique co code.
A unique co code could not be assigned to Co no.
Message No GLT0001

Tac code error in MIRO

Hi! Guys,
I am facing an issue with MIRO transaction with zero value tax code v0. The error i am getting while posting the invoice is
"Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTXNJ"
Message no. FF713
I have copied and created a new tax procedure from TAXINJ and created condition types for VAT and service tax also i have assigned the access sequence MWST to all the condition types in ZTXNJ. If i give another tax code in PO for which i have some rate defined for VATand service tax i am able to post the invoice.
However i am getting the same error when i try to do the settlement of the Internal order assigned in PO.
Please let me know where i am wrong or what config is missing.
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
Siddharth

Hi! Sridar,
That information has really been helpful, however i am now getting error message stating
"No posting rules defined for the account key"
I have defined posting rules for the account keys used in the tax procedure using OB40 but the issue persists. Do you have any idea why this is happening?
Thank for your help.
Regards,
Siddharth

Logistics Invoice Verification - Error in MIRO Transaction

While posting the invoice in MIRO we get an error - " Maximum permitted number of internal tax items reached". What is the solution?

Split Document into Two Documents.
The maximum number of items for an FI document ('999') has been exceeded.
System response
FI documents have a 3-digit item counter that limits the number of items permitted per document.
Procedure
If the documents with an excessive number of items come from another application area
(e.g. sales, logistics, order accounting), you can configure the system to the effect that
these documents are summarized in FI. "
How could this error be solved as none of your invoices are getting accounted in FI?
To overcome this, the only way was to break the accounting invoices, 1 with 950 items and the other with the rest.

Error in MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for