Error in Planned value Book depreciation in AS03

Hello,
We have 3 fiscal periods namely 2009, 2010, 2011. The assets are bought in the fiscal year 2009 and should be depreciated following a straight line method.
In May 2010, it was decided that the depreciation key for a depreciation area XXX should be modified from LINE to LINZ (that is from straight line to straight line with VMR 75%).
The errors that occured after this modification are:
1) Even though we are in fiscal year 2011, the planned value Book depreciation table for fiscal year 2011 is empty .
2) At the start of the year 2009, the asset has a scrap value of 3549,33 eur. This should not be the case since when an item is bought it only has an acquisition value and no scrap value.
3) Even though there has been a change in the depreciation key and the NBV has been decreasing over the years, the depreciation value in fiscal year 2010 is similar to the depreciation value on the fiscal year 2009.
We are trying to reproduce this error but we are unable to do so as we are not aware of the FI closure steps to be carried out.
Can you please share any ideas in case you have encountered a similar situation?
Thanking you in advance

Hi,
There are many reasons to it.
1) If the FYV is a non-standard one, please ensure that periods have been configured for future years.
2) Try executing AFAR (Recalculate depreciation).
Best Regards,
Madhu

Similar Messages

I am trying to export the combained PDF based on BOOK opetion using below scripts. but i am getting following error message "Invalid value for parameter 'to' of method 'exportFile'. Expected File, but received 1952403524". anyone knows, please suggest me

Dear ALL,
i am trying to export the combained PDF based on BOOK opetion using below scripts. but i am getting following error message "Invalid value for parameter 'to' of method 'exportFile'. Expected File, but received 1952403524". anyone knows, please suggest me solutions.
var myBookFileName ,myBookFileName_temp;
 if ( myFolder != null )
 var myFiles = [];
 var myAllFilesList = myFolder.getFiles("*.indd");
 for (var f = 0; f < myAllFilesList.length; f++)
 var myFile = myAllFilesList[f];
 myFiles.push(myFile);
 if ( myFiles.length > 0 )
 myBookFileName = myFolder + "/"+ myFolder.name + ".indb";
 myBookFileName_temp=myFolder.name ;
 myBookFile = new File( myBookFileName );
 myBook = app.books.add( myBookFile );
 myBook.automaticPagination = false;
 for ( i=0; i < myFiles.length; i++ )
 myBook.bookContents.add( myFiles[i] );
 var pdfFile =File(File(myFolder).fsName + "\\"+myBookFileName_temp+"_WEB.pdf");
 var bookComps = myBook.bookContents;
 if (bookComps.length === 1)
 bookComps = [bookComps];
 var myPDFExportPreset = app.pdfExportPresets.item("AER6");
 app.activeBook.exportFile(ExportFormat.PDF_TYPE,File("D:\\AER\\WEBPDF.pdf"),false,myPDFEx portPreset,bookComps);
 //myBook.exportFile (ExportFormat.pdfType, pdfFile, false);
 //myBook.exportFile(pdfFile, false, pdfPref, bookComps);
 myBook.close(SaveOptions.yes);

Change the below line:
app.activeBook.exportFile(ExportFormat.PDF_TYPE,File("D:\\AER\\WEBPDF.pdf"),false,myPDFExp ortPreset,bookComps);
to
app.activeBook.exportFile(ExportFormat.PDF_TYPE,File("D:\\AER\\WEBPDF.pdf"),false,myPDFExp ortPreset);
Vandy

Asset Depreciation Planned values

Hi Everyone,
There is a requirement for us to pull planned as well as posted depreciation values for assets. The input for the program would essentially be Fiscal Year, selected list of asset class & cost centers. We are using the FM 'AM_SHOW_POST_DEPR' to fetch posted & planned values. Now the issue is that, since not many key fields are provided, the report takes so much time to fetch the required assets and its posted / plan values. On doing a more close analysis it was found that 75 % of the data fetching time is consumed by the FM 'AM_SHOW_POST_DEPR'. Is there any other function modules / method to perform the activity done by this FM, so that the performance can be improved, or if possible can somebody provide the logic involved in asset plan data projection.
This FM returns the values which can be seen in posted values tab of the transaction code 'AW01N'.
Regards,
Kiran

You are talking about dep planned values thus this is not posted as actual values?
When the actuals values are posted there is longer planned values.
When you want to make changes you can use the transaction:
ABZU - Write-Up
When you want to do this you should re open fiscal year 2008 for asset accounting. Following on this you have to do the fiscal year closing again for 2008 and 2009.
This action will create postings in FI in 2008 and 2009!!!!!!!

Depreciation Planned Values missing in AW01N

Hi ,
we have a scenario in which few assets is not showing any depreciation values for period 9 (i.e. post/planned), instead the depreciation value period 9 is transferred to the period 10.
Example: if depreciation value is 100 EUR for all the periods (1-12) and the depreciation run is successfully completed till period 8 for an asset. when we analyse the period 9 planned values in Asset Explorer screen, the entire row is missing and the period 10 is showing with a planned value of 200 EUR (inlcusive of period 9).
Any solution to rectify this scenario ?
Regards
Govindarajan

Hi
In AFAB
1. PLANNED posting run
2. REPEAT
3.RESTART
4. UNPLANNED posting run
While claculating dep which dep key you select from the above fileds. check it properly
Thanks
Anil

BUDGET PLAN VALUE AND DISTRIBUTABLE VALUE ERROR

Hey Experts,
We have user Investment management for Budgeting process. We have been using this for last 5 years. After creating the AR and assigning them to the Budget program, we use IM34 to do the rollup of the plan values. After that to allocate the Planned values as budget value, we run the transcation code IMCCP1. For past all years this has been smooth, We found today that the program for 2011 has error as follows
When we did the distribution in jan 2011
Budget distributed             Current Budget         Distributable              Plan Values            Cumulative
10000                                10000                       10000                         10000                    10000
When we checked it this Feb 2011
Budget distributed             Current Budget         Distributable              Plan Values            Cumulative
10000                                20000                       20000                         20000                    20000
It is very surprising that the values have exactly doubled. There was no changes done for any AR of no one changed the IM34 run nor IMCCP1. Please help in resolving this issue.
Regards
Vikat

Hey Experts,
We have user Investment management for Budgeting process. We have been using this for last 5 years. After creating the AR and assigning them to the Budget program, we use IM34 to do the rollup of the plan values. After that to allocate the Planned values as budget value, we run the transcation code IMCCP1. For past all years this has been smooth, We found today that the program for 2011 has error as follows
When we did the distribution in jan 2011
Budget distributed /Current Budget /Distributable/ Plan Values /Cumulative
10000 /10000 /10000/ 10000 /10000
When we checked it this Feb 2011
Budget distributed/ Current Budget /Distributable /Plan Values /Cumulative
10000 /20000 /20000 /20000 /20000
It is very surprising that the values have exactly doubled. There was no changes done for any AR of no one changed the IM34 run nor IMCCP1. Please help in resolving this issue.
Regards
Vikat

Asset planned values computed positive value Issue

HI experts,
I have an existing asset problem where the planned depreciation values becomes positive. Why does it becomes positive? How does system calculates this planned values? We just did some adjustment to the Asset by Credit Memo and another Mark-up transaction. Sample:
Asset 1610600065
Planned Values - Transactions:
26.02.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85-     98,666.66     98,666.66     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85     98,666.66-     98,666.66-     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48-     93,333.33     93,333.33     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48     93,333.33-     93,333.33-     SGD
26.02.2011     160,000.00     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00-     0.00     0.00     SGD
23.06.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     60,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     101,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     33,925.92-     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
                                                               26,074.08     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
But the planned/posted value for this period is positive:
Status Status Period Amount
Green Posted     1     6,666.67-
Green Posted     2     6,666.66-
Green Posted     3     6,666.67-
Green Posted     4     6,666.67-
Green Posted     5     6,666.66-
Green Posted     6     6,370.37
YellowPlanned     7     4,493.83-
Posted Values - Depreciation Posted/Planned:
APC transactions     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Acquisition value     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Ordinary deprec.     220,000.00-     26,962.96-     246,962.96-     SGD
Unplanned dep.                    SGD
Write-ups          101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
Value adjustment                    SGD
Revaluation ord.dep.                    SGD
Net book value     180,000.00     85,629.63-     94,370.37     SGD
Down payments                    SGD
Scrap value                    SGD

I believe in your case, the tremendous reduction in APC cost has caused a tremendous change in planned depreciation. System looks at the NBV and the remaining periods of useful life each time it calcs depreciation. Of course also looks at depreciation key, Period Control, and OAYR Smoothing button. Asset class can also be set for group depreciation.
If a credit memo reduced the APC value dramatically, then the amount of depreciation on the asset at that moment is more than enough so far. This means that the next running of the AFAB program will reduce its amount of depreciation from the amount it was planning to book since it already has an excess of accumulated depreciation.
Please check in OAYR to know if your Smoothing indicator has been checked for the Company Code. As I understand the system, if this indicator is checked - the system will not catch-up the whole difference in the next running of AFAB. Instead, it will smooth out the adjustments due to credit memos, unplanned depreciation, and changes in remaining useful life over the remaining life of the asset. When smoothing is set, one gets less drastic period to period change.
This setting should be in line with your accounting rules, such as in US GAAP changes in depreciable life are considered estimate changes requiring only prospective corrections, and so should smooth out impact over remaining periods of useful life versus immediate catch-up.
You may want to run a AFAR (check for recalc flags) and then a Repeat AFAB in the current period after making master data changes for depreciation. All open periods would be impacted by master data changes if you run AFAB.

AW01N shows planned values in period 12 under posted values tab

Hi,
I need to change the useful life and depreciation key of an asset. Before the change, the 2009 depreciation values in AW01N under the posted values tab shows 500,000 monthly depreciation from period 1 to period 12 totalling 6M for that year.
After changing depreciation key to ZLNR which has a base value key of 24 (net book value), system added another line item for a planned value of 3.750M.
Why did the system add another planned value? I do not want to change the 2009 depreciation values. However, I must show that the depreciation values in 2010 will "catch up" i.e. decreased depreciation because of longer useful life.
Thanks and regards,
Tess

Resolved. I must close the 2009 fiscal year first before changing the useful life and the depreciation key.

Error: Missing initial value for session parameter

Hi,
I'm facing a problem while running the ETL process for Complete 11.5.10 Execution Plan in DAC Client. Some tasks are getting failed beacuse of the following error:-
ERROR : TM_6292 : (5080|4064) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]: VAR_27026 [Error: Missing initial value for session parameter:[$DBConnection_OLAP].].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (5080|4064) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Mon Nov 19 21:01:52 2007]].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (5080|4064) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]: TM_6270 [Error: Variable parameter expansion error.].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (5080|4064) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Mon Nov 19 21:01:52 2007]].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (5080|4064) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]: TM_6163 [Error initializing variables and parameters for the paritition.].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (5080|4064) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Mon Nov 19 21:01:52 2007]].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (5080|4064) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]: TM_6226 [ERROR: Failed to initialize session [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]].
ERROR : LM_36320 [Mon Nov 19 21:02:08 2007] : (2108|2632) Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full]: Execution failed.
When i checked the parameter file i can see the value assigned to the $DBConnection_OLAP. The same tasks ran successfully when i ran the ETL process for Complete 11.5.10 for the first time. I did not change anything after that and also all these are came built-in with the installation of Oracle BI Applications.
Please anyone give me an idea what is causing the problem.
Thanks,

in DAC > Run History > Task Details, query
Name = SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Temporary
Open Status Description, look for string -lpf, the file after it is the actual parameter file DAC send to INFA server. E.g
-lpf D:\DACTOPUS\Informatica\parameters\SDE_ORAR12_Adaptor.SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Temporary.txt
Open the parameter file, most likely the [session_name] does not match with SDE_ORA_Product_Category_Derive_Full or some parameters are missing.

Asset still showing planned value for closed fiscal year.

*We have a situation:- After we ran depreciation for Dec 2009, there was a credit memo posting done in the system for a particular asset. Now, the fiscal year has been closed for 2009 and 2010 is opened. Jan and Feb depreciation posting has been done for the asset for year 2010, but the credit memo posting is still stuck as planned value in the 12th period of 2009. How can we take care of that? I canu2019t run unplanned depreciation for 2009. Is there a better way to take care of this? I thought about opening year 2009 for the asset (ccode) and then running unplanned depreciation. Will that be a problem? If yes, what other solution can be proposed.*
*Appreciate the response.*

Hi,
If it is not possible to open the fiscal year because audit
has already been completed we have a workaround which is not quite
correct from the legal side ist thereport RACORR20_A from note 29694.
If in table ANLC there are differences between posted and planed
depr. the report simply makes: planed = posted.
The correct way would be:
-> Reopen your GL for FY 2008 via OB52.
-> Recalculate values (RAAFAR00)
-> RAPOST2000
-> RAPERB2000
-> RAJABS00
Regards Bernhard

APC Value and Plan Value for an Asset.

HI Gurus,
I am developing a report where I have to display the APC value and Plan value of an Asset.Can anyone pls give an insight how to find this for the Asset.

Hi,
why don´t you use the logical database ADA which most of the FI-AA standard reports do? The logical database is a service to get this information without developing all the READ information and translation by yourself, especially when talking about mid-year-reporting, consistence checks, etc..
If you decide to use ADA, then the events GET ANLA0, GET ANLAV and GET ANLCV are from interest for you for information about APC and planned/posted depreciation value.
Regards,
Markus

In which areas planned values affect..

Hello Experts,
Can You tell me that in which which areas and modules the planned values of asset module is connected...
E.G. If we change anything related to life of the asset or something else where where it wil affect. If any one has any chart or PPt regarding that.. can you share?

Hi
It will affect the Planned Values (Dep Values) in the Asset Master in AW01N
Upon next dep run, the differential depreciation of all open previous period / Fiscal year will be posted in the next period / over the next periods
Eg: APC Value 12000, Use ful life 12 months.... So, Dep each month is 1000... You posted Dep till March (3 months)... You change the useful life to 6 months in April....
So, the depreciation posted in April will be 12000/6 (2000)+ (2000-1000) x 3 = 5000 i.e. 2000 of April month + delta depreciation 1000 of earlier months.... This is if you dont tick the SMOOTHING indicator in OAYR
If you tick the smoothing indicator in OAYR, the delta depreciation 3000 will be spread over Apr-Dec i.e. 9 months instead of posting in April itself
Br, Ajay M

How to remove planned values in last year

Hi,
In one of my asset ord. depr is showing planned value as 1.00.(positive value)
Due to this system is not allowing to close the 2008 fiscal year.
How can we remoove or adjust this 1 rupee.
Sateesh

Hi,
At the time of sold the asset without revenue, Rs 1 is showing in NBV as planned value.
And my account books are closed.
My clien want to adjust the Rs 1 in this year (2009) and want to close the asset. due to this system is not allowing to close the last fiscal year
guide me
sateesh

Planned Value Problems

Hi everybody
hi everybody
I will
thank any help.
I have a Schedule with Resource
Labor and budget quantity distribuited in manual curve
resource (future period bucket), my baseline is definided
in this way too.
Now, i want show
in Activity Table:
Earned Value
Labor Units (BQWP),
Planned Value Labor Units
(BQWS), and
Actual Labor Units (AQ) 
and my problem is this:
my
activity BBB, have 66331 Man hours distribuited in 6
months in this way 17881, 12759, 12116, 11940, 7707,
3928.
So at finish of first month my Planned
Value is 17881 Man hours but P6 show 10993 same error in
Earned Value Report, but in Resource Spreadsheet the
Planned Value is 17881.
This
problem is in each activity of my schedule, the activities
are definides like fixed duration&units. and i try
solve this problem changing % complete type at Units,
Physical and Duration, without sucessfull. 
Then, how can set P6 for calculate
Planned Value from resource curve in my baseline? 
Regards,
Henry

Dear Friends,
I was trying to solve this
problem, and make a schedule with just one activity
with one resource assignment, and the problem is
same.
I make one activity with 100 Budgeted
units, duration 181 days, scheduled early start
July/01/08. I enter manually budgeted units by month
27, 19, 18, 18, 12, 6.
 Then:
1.- Created Baseline from copy
of this schedule
2.- Start activity on
July/01/08
3.- Run Data date on
July/31/08
this current
schedule have Planned Value units=17, I don´t know
what is wrong?
In WBS i set Earned Value
Tab, for caculate Earned Value by futupe period
Bucket.
in Summary, the Planned
Value Unit and Schedule % Complete are diferent of
Planned Value Expected in Baseline.
 I hope you can help me
 Best Regards
Henry

Error - Overview Planning (T.Code IMAPL) - Invest Management

Dear All,
As i am entering the Planned values on the appropriation request using the T. Code IMAPL, i found the bellow shown error.
"Planning profile 000001 does not allow planning in controlling area currency"
I couldn't even unable to view the Approriation Request that i have created at the above mentioned screen (IMAPL)
Controlling Area Currency - USD
Company Code Currency - MYR
System has selected the MYR as default Currency in the Appropriation request that i has created.
So I would like to request you to provide me the solution to over come the above error ASAP.
Thanks in Advance
Gopi

Check you configuration node OIP1, the Planning currency and set default object currency check box.
Regards
Sreenivas

Question about project plan value and availability control

dear expert：
I had built a project, and with CJ30, Allocated budget is 10000, in one of WBS element.
I created a network and internal activities,
when I assiged a material component (Res + PR) and system can be saved even if the total plan cost value is crossing the budget value.(There is no PR created, now. )
But, Budget checking is showing error message that budget is exceeded when I created any external service activity and crossing the budget value.(There is also no PR created, now. )
My question is: what is the difference of the two plan value? Why one is relevant to the budget,and the other is not?
Note:1) the tolerance limit with ++ (all activity groups), usage say 100% & action 3 (error) to the budget profile. The budget prifile is considered with only overall budget.
2)In tables COSP, "value types" are all 01 (plan), but VRGNG field values are different, components plan is: KPPE
Service activities are: KPPP
3)in CJ30 u2013 Extras>> Availability Control>> Analysis. I could see the following in red colour, these values system not considering into account.
Entries in this color make no contribution to the assigned value!
V: Value type not relevant ( Act./Plan/Stat.Act./Stat.Plan/Commt)
D: Delivery
S: Settlement to object with no budget control
R: Revenue cost element
C: Cost element is exempt cost element
M: Minimum from actual + commitment and plan per order value update
P: Plan value is not on apportioned order / network
B: Plan Costing Single Position
S: Funds Commitment in Balance
Following is for material
COSP 2011 01 8001110100 0000000200 KPPE D RMB 200,000.00 RMB B
Following is for service
COSP 2011 01 8001110400 KPPP D RMB 10.00 RMB
regard
mao jian

Hi,
Its not per item category. If N or L sytem will check the budget if in your system if proper GL's are maintained in OBYC settings BSX and GBB > VBR nad cost elelemtns are created for them. for this you have to cosult with your MM / CO consultant.
PS is highly inteergratd with CO and all values are updated per cost elements. If values are not updated in cost elements then budget chek wil not happen.
In you case for material values may be updated in cost elements due to improper OBYC setting so budget check was not done.
Chekc your OBYC setting and try to create material PR system will check for the budget.
Check and confirm.
regards,

Error in Planned value Book depreciation in AS03

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for