Error - Inconsistent Situation in Vendor Evaluation

I am following Vendor Eval: Config Guide Release 500.  I am on SRM_Plus 5.5 (Highest Level SAPKIBK007).  When I execute Vendor Evaluation from Vendor List - I am getting error "Inconsistent Situation in Vendor Evaluation".  Per config guide, it tells me to activate both EBP and the web survey service using SICF.  I have found EBP and it is activated.  However, I can find nothing in the tree that says web survey service.  Is there another name for this service?
Points will be awarded based on reply.

Hi Sanjeev -
I have applied SAP Note 1078545.  However, I still get Error - Inconsistent Situation in Vendor Evaluation.
When activating the new UWS_FORMSERVICE - it asked for a default user and password.  As I reviewed the old UWS_FORM_SERVICE and BBP_VE_SERVICE (EBP) - neither had a default user established.  I have set up a "service" user with authorization S_A.SCON authorizations.  This service user was per the Config Guide.  Is this the same user I should default into UWS_FORMSERVICE?  And, do I need it also for BBP_VE_SERVICE? 
Here is what I know:
I can execute the Survey and it's questionnaire using a static URL:
http://myserverinfo:8000/sap/bc/bsp/sap/uws_formservice/page1.htm?uws_application=SRM_VENDOR_EVALUATION&uws_mode=CREATE&uws_service_id=NGC_PL_QUE&sap-language=en&sap-client=150
(It was asking me to sign in until I added the new default user and password to UWS_FORMSERVICE).
ERROR = Inconsistent Situation In Vendor Evaluation
I can execute trying to start the BBP_VE_SERVICE:
http://myserverinfo:8000/sap/bc/bsp/sap/bbp_ve_service/default.htm?&sap-language=en&sap-client=150
ERROR = Vendor evaluation not activated. 
Your help is been invaluable.
Points awarded based on reply.
Regards,
Teresa
Edited by: Teresa Berenyi on Feb 20, 2009 7:54 PM

Similar Messages

  • Error in ME6C in Vendor Evaluation

    Hello
    I am running Vendor Evaluation report using transaction ME6C which shows the list of Vendors which are not evaluated.
    However I observed that system is displaying report for only 1 Purchasing Organization.I mean if the Vendor exists for 5 Purchasing Organizations it should display report for all 5 POrgs that Vendor is not evaluated for all these 5 POrgs.But it displays only for 1 PORGS?
    Is it standard functionality of Vendor Evaluation?What I have to do if I have to get report for all Purchasing Organizations
    Regards

    Have you customizing for vendor evaluation in each of the 5 purchasing orgs, or only in 1 purchasing org?
    Have you business with this vendor in the other purchasing orgs  in the customized period for vendor evaluation? Check table S013
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Jan 14, 2009 2:57 PM

  • Vendor Evaluation in srm 4.0

    Hi Experts,
    I have 2 questions:
    1. Does anyone have any documentation about Vendor Evaluation in SRM 4.0 that can send me   ?
    2. I build new questionnaire in SRM 4.0. When I created G/R in the SRM system
    I got error  message "Inconsistent situation in vendor evaluationu201D?
    Thank you
    Tal Nakash

    Dear Nagesh,
    Follow the link given below, you can find the Vendor Evaluation Config guide
    https://websmp108.sap-ag.de/%7Eform/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000392193&;
    The Configuration steps for the Vendor Evaluation in SRM are :
    1.Create Web Survey  SPRO--> Integration with other mySAP Components --> Setting for application specific Datasources --> Websurvey Cockpit for SRM Vendor Evaluation
    You will find std websurvey, you can use them or copy them and create you own qustionnaires.
    2.Create Web Questionnaire
    3.Assign Web Questionnaire to Survey
    4.Assign Target Group to Web Survey
    5.Define Events for Vendor Evaluation. Here we assign web survey and web questionnaires to local product categories.  SPRO--> Integration with other mySAP Components --> Setting for application specific Datasources --> Define Events for Vendor Evaluation in SRM.
    Rgds
    Amith

  • Vendor Evaluation error

    Hi,
    During maintaining a vendor evaluation, I am getting the following error message:
    "System settings for purchasing org 0001 incomplete".
    I've maintained the following settings in Customizing:
    1) Define weighting keys
    2) Define criteria
    3) Define scope list
    4) Maintaining Purchasing Organization Data
    Are there any other settings to be made somewhere?
    Thanks for your help.

    This is becuause some customising is not  complete in 4)Maintaining Pur org data. Please go thro each step  1) Main creteria 2) Sub createria for each main creteria 3) Weighing key assignments ...
    Regards
    Mani

  • Vendor evaluation Pricing error: Field overflow

    Hi All,
    I scheduled monthly batch job for vendor evaluation, unfortunately i'm getting Pricing error: Field overflow with Message no. V1802
    Ofcourse pricing is one of the criteria for my vendor evaluation, my worry is that this evaluation is being carried out for all the vendors in more than 25 POrg's.
    Can you please guide me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance
    Pavan

    Hi Arminda:
    yes i'm getting same error "price error: field overflow" even now
    Jürgen:
    yes i am running batch job for this vendor evaluation process with the variant, my problem is that " Batch job is getting cancelled due to few errors in vendor evaluation process called 'price error: field overflow'..
    can you please any one of you tell me how to get ride of this error.
    thanks
    Pavan

  • Vendor evaluation  URGENT

    While using the t- code ME61 for Vendor Evaluation I am getting an error that Purchasing organization data is incomplete Pls. Help me
    regards

    Hi
    Vendor evaluations done at Purchase organization level.You have to define the control parameters at Purchase organization level.
    Path for configuring the Vendor eveluation:
    <b>SPRO> MM> Purchasing --> Vendor eveluation --> Define Purchase organization data for Vendor eveluation.</b>
    Here you have to enter your purcvhase organization and define the control parameters like  Best score,Applicability period etc.
    If you want std configuration, please copy std Purchase org (1000) settings to your purchase organization by selecting copy as.
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • Vendor Evaluation formula

    Dear All,
                   Kindly give me the vendor evaluation formula.
    I have configured the vendor evaluation with the following weighting factors:
    Price : 30%
    Quality: 50%
    Delivery : 20%
    i want to know how it is calculating internally in SAP .i want the formula for thes
    Regards
    Kumar.

    Hi,
    please go through the following link. there is a document given by SAP.
    COIN error during MB1A transaction code
    this document explains all the formulae you are asking.
    agian there are many threads which discuss about the various problems faced in this functionality and there you may find the explainations related to it with the formulaes.
    regards,
    Adwait Bachuwar

  • Vendor Evaluation(2LIS_02_S013)

    Hello Friends
    i have  issue with 2lis_02_s013 vendor evaluation . issue is when i do full upload for  this data source i can retrive around 12000 records and when i try to do intial upload the system gives me error
    LIS updating is still activated (client 200 )M+     25     
    Errors in source system     RSM     340     
    so i am unable to intial load so i did intial load without any datatransfer . it works fine . it has transfered only one record . but when i do the delta upload it does not extarct any data it shows 0/0 records but the staus is green . when i see the details tab Processing (data packet): No data .i have already activated delta in the lbw1 . there i find only two options one asynchronous and noupdating i have selected . asynchronus. here do i need to fill any setup sepatretely for delta . so how can we delete the setup tables for 'S'types data sources. is that same as lbwq. plz let me know what need to be done inorder to fill the cube with delta upload . look forward to your valuble replays and points will be awareded .
    Thankyou

    Kumar,
         Fill up the setup tables for that extractor. Because the LO extraction only eorks on the the setup tables. And the setup tables are used when you do the delta.
    Go to SBIW -> Business Information Warehouse -> Logistics -> Managing Extract Structures ->
    Initilization -> Delete the setup tables. Select your extractor and delete the setup tables for it..And...
    SBIW -> Business Information Warehouse -> Logistics -> Managing Extract Structures -> Initilization -> Filling setup tables. Fill the corresponding setup tables for vendor evaluation.
    Try checking the data in RSA3.
    Hope this helps.....

  • Alternative for extractor 2LIS_02_S013  Vendor Evaluation InfoCube 0PUR_C02

    Hi BW Gurus
    Could some one advise me any alternative for 2LIS_02_S013  (Vendor Evaluation).
    Vendor evaluation data is required for my customer.
    At present 0PUR_C02 (Vendor evaluation) deactivated. due to miss match of fields S013, S013BIW1 and S013BIW2.
    We are facing MIGO posting error update terminated. Now i had deactivated S013 at LBW0.
    We already tried as per SAP note  Note 115192 and 818652.
    But thre is no use.
    Look forward to your valuble replays and points will be awareded .
    Thankyou

    Hi,
    There is no alternative alternative for 2LIS_02_S013  to upload the cube  0PUR_C02
    But I hope, we can replace the cube  0PUR_C02  with  0PUR_C05 .0PUR_C05 gets the data by the data source 0MM_PUR_VE_01.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e7/daba37d4c2503ee10000009b38f842/frameset.htm
    With rgds,
    Anil Kumar Sharma .P

  • Vendor Evaluation - GR Cancell handling

    Dear All,
    Vendor Evaluation scores are calculated for each goods receipt carried out. However, if I goods receipt is posted incorrectly and the GR is subsequently cancelled the on-time delivery score is not reset.
    Please advise whether there is anyway to prevent cancelled goods receipts from being included or to reverse the score that they have generated. Also please look to see whether there are any OSS Notes affecting this as it is a SAP Standard routine.
    As the score is not reversed these figures are confusing for the business and it is believed to be an error.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mahesh

    No answer

  • Vendor evaluation - Price level

    Hi,
    pls can anybody help me to explain procedure how system calculating the sub criteria PRICE LEVEL, PRICE HISTORY , ONTIME DELIVERY,QTY RELIABILITY (Under main criteria PRICE,DELIVERY) in vendor evaluation process.
    Possible give sample calculation.
    Aparji

    Price Level
    This subcriterion compares relationship of a vendor's price to the market price. If the vendor's price is lower than the market price, he/she receives a good score; if it is higher than the market price he/she is assigned a poor score.
    On the basis of the subcriterion "Price Level" you can compare a vendor's price to the current market price at a certain point in time.
    Price History
    This subcriterion compares the development of the vendor's price with the market price.
    On the basis of the subcriterion "Price History", you can determine whether the vendor's price has increased or decreased over a certain period in comparison with changes in the market price over the same period.
    Goods Receipt
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality of the material that the vendor delivers. Quality inspection takes place at the time of goods receipt.
    Quality Audit
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality assurance system used by a company in manufacturing products.
    Complaints/Rejection Level
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
    The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.
    On-Time Delivery Performance
    This subcriterion is used to determine how precisely a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
    Quantity Reliability
    This subcriterion is used to determine whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
    "On-Time Delivery Performance" and "Quantity Reliability" always have to be seen in conjunction. You can specify for each material (in the material master record) or for all materials (in the system settings) the minimum quantity of the ordered materials that must be delivered in order for a goods receipt to be included in the evaluation. This enables you to avoid a situation in which a punctual goods receipt involving only a small quantity of ordered materials is included in the evaluation with a good score for "On-Time Delivery Performance". If this minimum quantity is not delivered, the vendor is not awarded a score. However, in this case the vendor

  • SRM vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    Has anybody worked with the new SRM Vendor Evaluation - Analytics with Surveys?
    I am trying to use the standard surveys/questionnaires provided in SRM 5.0 - SRM_CONF1E, SRM_VL_E, SRM_INVE.
    Have activated the event: Confirmation with the following settings:
    Transaction type: Confirmation
    Vendor: *
    Purchasing organization: *
    Category ID: 
    Source system: 
    Product ID:  *
    Procedure : Always - When Saving
    Probability: 
    WebSurvey: SRM_CONF
    Questioannaire: SRM_CONF_1
    Now, when I do a confirmation from the Confirm Goods/Services Screen, I am still not getting the questionnaire. Are there any other configurations to be done?
    Any help will be highly appreciated/reward.
    Regards,
    Waheed

    Hi Waheed,
    do you get an error message?
    Depending on error, it could be the unicode setting of your system. The standard questionnaires work fine in NON-Unicode. In Unicode system, sometimes it is necessary to copy the standard questionnaire into an own survey.
    Also the XSLT code might be missing and need to be generated.
    Kind regards,
    Claudia

  • Vendor Evaluation DS: 0MM_PUR_VE_01

    Hi All,
    I got an issue while loading the data in MM for Vendor Evaluation Data cube 0PUR_C05 through the data source 0MM_PUR_VE_01. iam geting an error that there is no data, i have checked in RSA3 in ECC there also it was showing 0 records. i have executed the setup run for the purchasing and inventory, even then also data was not there. i have checked in the LO customizing cockpit there this data source is not there in relevent nodes.
    where shall i need to check for the data population and how to get the data to this data source. please give me some inputs which can be helpful.
    Thanks & Regards
    Prabhakar

    Hi...
    YES. The extractor will fetch the data automatically from FM when ever it is triggered.
    One more thing:
    Have you activated the Update for this data source before executing SetUp. Otherwise SetUp will not be executed.
    To Activate the Extract Sturcture Update for the data source
    0MM_PUR_VE_01 :
    Go to LBWE Tcode select the Data Source and Activate the Extract Structure Update if it is INACTIVE.
    Then Goto OLI2BW and Run the setup.
    Check the data in RSA3.
    Hope this helps u. Let me know.

  • Vendor Evaluation - Help Needed

    Hello,
    We do not have any errors for the vendor evaluation as we are yet to develop the model.
    We are trying to get the Automatic scores for Pricing, Quality, Delivery and invoices from ECC to BW.
    At the same time we want to use a Web Survey for additional scoring based on Plant
    We are not able to find the data sources that can bring the automatic scores especially for Pricing into BW. Also integrating the Web survey scores with the Automatic scoring is not very clear from the configuration documents from SAP. Can you please give me the appropriate information and/or SAP notes pertaining to this development.
    Thank you so very much,
    Lynda

    Hope it is a program BBPUPDVD and take help from technical resource and massage this program as you expected and schedule it.
    I have multiple user IDs on SCN, is it possible to consolidate my IDs and my points?
    Yes it is possible. You need to decide which user ID you want to keep, then send an email to [email protected], provide the user ID and ask for the consolidation to be done.
    Your blog and forum contributions will all be moved to your single user ID and the points will be consolidated. For the wiki, your points will be brought to your unique user ID but unfortunately, we don't have the ability to move your Wiki contributions to another user ID at this time.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/crphelp

  • Vendor evaluations

    pl. guiide me ,
    i have maintain all settings for vendor evalations for perticulat pur.org. but while evaluation there is a error - system settings for pur. org. is incomplete in me 61 tcode. or tell me with tcode the vendor evaluation steps

    SPRO->MM->purchasing->vendor evalution
    1. Define weighing keys
    2. Define criteria
    3. Define scope of list
    4. Define purchase organisation data for vendor evalution
    5. Goto Main criteria
    6. Select criterial clicl on sub criteria
    7. Points score for automatic criteria
    ME61 Maintain
    ME64 Compare evalution
    Ravi

Maybe you are looking for

  • Moving Mail Users from a Local Directory to Open Directory

    Hi, We have been running a standalone mail server for a few years. We have recently upgraded to 10.5 for all of our servers. We have also been running an Open Directory server for the last year or so. Now I am trying to move my email users from the L

  • Mail subject modification for smart-form SMIV

    Hi Experts, We have implemented ServiceDesk in Solution Manager 7.1 SPS 08 & are using automatic notifications to be generated as alert emails to the customer key users / service desk support team / message processors etc. We are using Actions under

  • Difference between standard report S_ALR_87011963 and the custom report

    Hi Friends, My client requires a report which displays the acquisition and depreciation values of assets. Actually the requirement is to display all the values except planned depreciation. Therefore we are taking the values only from the table ANLP.

  • 1st iTunes purchase--BIG disappointment!  Need advice.

    OK, we missed the 2nd part of a TV show thanks to a recording glitch. So, we figured, no sweat, it'd be worth $2 getting it from iTunes. Signed up, found the show, downloaded it (that went quickly). First purchase from iTunes; probably last given wha

  • MP3 support.

    Hi, I'd like to know why quicktime cannot play all my mp3 files whereas they seem to have no codec difference. I got the same problem with mp3 streams in a video for instance. Do anyone know why?   Windows XP