Error of taxes while doing MIGO

Hi Friends,
I am trying to do the MIGO of an old PO having open quantities but it is giving me a message of  "BED, AED and SED for the excise item is zero". I am unable to understand why this error because I did migo for the same PO last week, system did not give me this error.
Can anyone please help.
Regards,
Wasim.

Dear Friends,
I have checked everything and all the settings are right. J1ID entries are proper, FV11 entries are proper, and taxes are getting calculated properly in the PO. But the problem still persist.
Can anyone please advice.
Regards,
Wasim.

Similar Messages

  • Error while doing MIGO

    Hi Experts,
    While doing migo system showing the error message:
    in this purchase order no excise.
    It is IS OIL process.
    Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date
        Message no. 8I629
    Pls help some one.
    Regards,
    Hanuman.

    HI
    is it Excisable Material, did you maintain  the Tax indicator in PO stage? IF yes , next step is to check , are you selecting the right Post to....... register menu during MIGO, for example we use Post to Part-1 register only, then if yes , the you are getting this error becuse you have missed the J1ID master data details. Minimum you should maintain 1. chapter_id details, 2. Material and chapter_id combination 3. Vendor Excise details. for the materials you are tring to make GR.
    Best Regards
    SAM

  • Error while doing MIGO for a sub-contracted item

    Hello to Everybody,
    I am facing below problem -
    Error : Incorrect CCtr <Cost Center Code> with this account (CCtr category must=D) for
    <Item Code> , while doing MIGO. (for receiving sub-contracted item from vendor).
    May I request for possible solution to above error ?
    regards,

    Dear Sanjay,
    You can determine the cost object for the posting of the  costs in the transaction OKB9.
    Following thread should resolve this issue:
    Re: cost of subcontracting
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • Error message while doing MIGO.

    Hi,
    I am getting error message while doing MIGO. Can some one help me out in this issue.
    Consolidated companies 0 and 5686 are different
    Message no. F5 080
    Diagnosis
    The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two different companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
    Procedure
    If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Subhajo

    Check Fi customizing in OBA7.
    As you mentioned MIGO, I assume you are doing goods receipt, so you use document type WE.
    Within WE you must not have selected  the field inter-company posting .
    Best you place the cursor into this field and press F1 for detailed explanation,

  • While doing MIGO transaction system showing error: Check table169P the entr

    Hi experts,
    while doing MIGO transaction system showing error: Check table169P the entry BP01 does not exit.
    pls do needful.
    Thanks&Regards
    sreenivas.p

    Hi,
    Please specify Whether you are doing Blocking of Invoices or what?
    As the T169P is A Parameters Invoice Verification, so you can check the values for T169P table in SE16 so that you will get Clear idea regarding  company code BP01 in which the stochastic block is active with Threshold value for stochastic block...
    Please check....
    For maintaining Entries please go to OMRG maintain Company code and Threshold value as per client requirement so that This will specifies the degree of probability that an invoice is stochastically blocked.
    Regards,
    Ninad Kshirsagar

  • While doing migo gertting error does not support serial management

    while doing migo 101mvt type getting error does not suppoert serial no management .
    Moderator: Please, avoid asking basic one-sentence questions. Your other threads were locked for the same reason

    Hi,
    Can you please check SAP Note 1262966 - MIGO and MIRO: Missing entries in T169P. This might be of some help to you. It states that
    You use transaction SM31 to delete an entry in the views V_169P_A, V_169P_B, V_169P_DC, V_169P_IRTAX, V_169P_K, V_169P_LOGO, V_169P_MB, V_169P_PA, V_169P_PR, V_169P_S, V_169P_SA or V_169P_SV. The entry from the table T169P is deleted when you delete the entry from one of the views.
    Different follow-on errors can occur in the transactions for inventory management or the Logistics Invoice Verification.
    Error M7 001 "Check table 169P: entry & & & does not exist" occurs in the transactions for inventory management. The system does not propose any data for order-related items in the transactions for the Logistics Invoice Verification.
    The entry in the table T169P is required for each company code for the function from Note 980420.
    Thnx,
    SG.

  • While doing MIGO system giving error massage "No account was specified for account type "D" in item "0000000001"

    Hello,
    While doing MIGO system showing error " No account was specified for account type "D" in item "0000000001"
    Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Abhijit

    Hi,
       Your issue seems to be an issue in FI. Refer the similar thread: MIGO error for UNBW material and the note: 1027645 - Message F5670: Account not specified in item X
       Found a similar issue in J1IS as explained in the KBA:  1932095 - Error : F5670 - ' No account is specified in item 0000000002 ' - in transaction J1IS
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Spool error while doing migo

    Dear MM Experts,
    While doing migo i am getting error as "Error in spool c call spool overflow"
    Got this thread but not getting exactly : http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?messageID=4528971#452897
    Please help me out.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sandeep.

    Hi all
    Delete the old spool request using SPAD .
    regards,
    reza rostami / mapna

  • Balance in Transaction currency while doing MIGO

    While doing MIGO, getting the error '' Balance in Transaction Currency'' and showing the total of Excise and Cess amounts.
    Urgent issue. Appreciate if you could respond asap
    thanks
    Sridevi

    hi
    sridevi,
    pls verify the raw material inventory account or the GR/IR clearing account, u might have checked only balances in local currency, or it could be in raw material master records, where in u might have selected the foreign currency valuation
    cheers
    bala reddy

  • While doing migo-goods receipt for production

    I am getting above message while doing migo
    please help
    Batch 0000000027 has the status <restricted-use>
    Message no. M7670
    Diagnosis
    You are attempting to post a batch with status <restricted use> for a goods receipt.
    System Response
    Depending on the system setting, the system issues either a warning or an error message.
    If the message is a warning (W), the system will accept your entry, but simultaneously issues a warning to prevent you from making the wrong entry.
    If the message is an error message (E), the system will not accept your entry.
    Procedure
    Make sure your entries are correct.
    thanks in advance
    kailash N. thakkar

    Dear,
    You cannot change the status of a batch (unrestricted/restricted) in a goods movement, only with the following functions: by maintaining the batch master record manually in MSC2n
    Got MSC2N On the initial screen, enter the batch data (material,plant batc).
    Select the indicator restricted-use.
    Check out the "Initial status of new batches" in transaction code OMAB whether your new batch status flaged for "Restricted" against your material type.
    Then go ahead for MIGO.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • While doing MIGO & MIRO for Third Party V/D

    Hi Gurus,
    While doing MIGO for Third Party Vendor, I am facing the below mentioned error.
    Maintain number range object for object J_1IRG23A1, year 2008, excise group V1
    Message no. 4F159
    Kindly suggest the solution for that.........
    After this i'll come to MIRO

    Goto J1I9, there put Object "J_1IRG23A1" and click on Number Ranges button, there for Excise Group "V1" maintain No. Range with No. Range Code "01"
    Pankaj Singh

  • While doing MIGO transfer within plant batch no should not be changed.

    Dear All,
            While doing MIGO transfer within plant (movement type 311), any user is able to change the batch and can assign new batch no.The process is as under.
    T.Code-- MIGO
    M.type --311
    Go in Transfer posting tab.
    In "From selection",
    Select Material and that material will be displayed in Destination selection automatically and can't be change.
    Select Plant and that plant will be displayed in Destination selection automatically and can't be change
    Select Storage location(from where material to be transfered) and we have to select storage location in "destination selection" where material is to be transfered.
    Same way Select Batch No in from selection and indestination selection batch is not coming automatically and we can give any batch no.So we do not want to allow this change and the batch no must remain same as selected in "from selection".
    Now how can i solved the problem and please suggest is there any role of abapers in this case and if yes then which concept we have to followed.This is standard program of sap so access key may be needed.So please guide me on above topics.
    Regards
    Shivam Pastagia.

    Hi Sivam,
    Sorry for asking the question to this old thread but I am having the same problem.
    My requirement is also to populate the destination batch same as From Batch without allowing the user to change it.
    Can you pleae let me know how did you solve it?
    Regards
    Narottam

  • In Depot Plant while Doing MIGO MRP indicator not found

    Dear All,
    We have one depot plant. for capturing of excise duty while doing MIGO
    I have not found the MRP indicator check box in excise ->misc. Tab.
    But for doing this same process for other manufacturing plant means non Depot plant I have found the MRP check box in excise ->misc. Tab.
    Is there any process to capture the MRP check box indicator in excise ->misc. Tab while doing MIGO for Depot plant or is there any process to book excise duty while doing MIGO for Depot Plant

    Please go through the Scenario #: Dealer Procurement in Excisable Depot scenario in the below link.
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-45855

  • J_1IRG23D Table was not updated With Correct Values While Doing MIGO

    Hi Friends,
    I am new to the Excise duty , facing a proble in CIN -While doing MIGO, the Excise Calculation are coming correct values (i.e 10% ),but in the table it was not updated correctly (J_1IRG23D) only one entry is showing wrong ,the other entries in the table are correct.
    In table -J_1IEXCDTL the EXBED it was with correct value 10% of the Base value
    But In table -J_1IRG23D the EXBED,ADE,CESS It was updated with 0.06% on the base value .its gives wrong value
    Kindly help in this issue.
    Regards
    Siva

    Hi,
    Go to T Code - J2I5 (not 215 it is j 2 i 5) enter details and select register PLA Check box and execute. This can be extracted many times - no problem.
    After J2i5 balance will update in registers including tables.
    Ramesh

  • How to Get Availability date? while doing MIGO

    Hi Guys ,
    Can any body tell me how can i get Availability Date while doing MIro ?
    1.I have to get Availability date
    2. and that Availability date is Production date + 8 days ?
    how can i implement this one ? is there any relevent user exits is there ?
    please give me some input?
    regards
    Prabhu

    Hi Guys ,
    Can any body tell me how can i get Availability Date while doing MIGO ?
    1.I have to get Availability date
    2. and that Availability date is Production date + 8 days ?
    how can i implement this one ? is there any relevent user exits ?
    please give me some input?
    regards
    Prabhu

Maybe you are looking for