Error with tax classification

Hello guru's,
I am facing a typical error. while creating sales order the VAT condition is capturing the tax classification indicator from sold to party. It has to be from ship to party. Pl. help.
Regards,

Hi,
The tax classification search is based on the Customer master data
For TAX determination, system will first search the Tax classification of the Payer master data
If Payer master Data is not maintained , then it will search for the Ship to Master data ,
If none of the Payer and Ship to were maintained , then it will search for the tax classification of sold to Master data
The Sequence for search is
PAYER
SHIP TO
SOLD TO
In your case, if the Tax classification for Payer and ship to not maintained then it will come to sold to
Please check if the Tax classification was maintained in the ship to or not
thanks
santosh

Similar Messages

Report of all materials with tax classif data under a certain plant

Hi All,
I need a report which will show the list of all materials and their tax classification data .(
under a certain plant ).
Preethi.

Hi,
You create the Query in SQVI by joining the tables --MARC, MVKE,MLAN.
So include the selection fields with Plant, Sales organization, Dist channel, Country, etc..
Out put fields you can include as per your requirements from all these tables .
rgds
gsc

Error in tax classification.

Hi Experts
i have one problem i maintain tax classification but when i changed the tax classification in mm02 in sales organization 1 in material master record it will be changed in all plants. i have same material in two plants for example material x in plant 1000 and same material x is also 2000 plant i maintained tax classification 0,1,2,3 so when i change tax classification in material x in plant 1000 in mm02 it automatically changed in plant 2000 also. so please tell me what is the problem.
my clients requirement is he want to maintain tax classification in 1000 plant 0 and 2000 plant is 1 so please tell me how can i maintain tax classification in plant specific.

Hi Rajesh,
I think this is the expected behaviour. The tax classification is not maintained at the plant level, but at the sales organisation level. If there are multiple plants for one sales organisation, and you want to maintain different tax rates based on the plants, then you have to include plant as one of the fields in your condition tables. Based on the value of the plants for the same tax classification, you can assign different tax codes, which has different tax rates.
Hope this helps you

Excise condition error in tax classification table

Dear Gurus,
While executing vat report in F.12, the system is throwing error" In table A003, the entry JMOP M2 IN is missing". After this it is showing a FI material doc no. which is affected. Actually this is dealer purchase scenario. I have checked fv11, it is maintained zero only. Excise has been entered manually at the time of grbut the user has not t ticked mrp indicator.Pls suggest
Regards,
kumar

Hi,
For the previous 2 months this report is giving result. Now only for june month this error is coming.As i told u it is showing this error also " Document number 52000616 in company code in fiscal year 2009 is affected"
Message no. FF099
Actually this is accounting document of MIRO which has been posted in this month.
Thanks & regards,
Kumar

Wrong Tax Classification Taken from Material Master

Hi Experts,
I have a problem with Tax classification when determining the tax % at sales order entry. Below is the scenario:
1) There are two taxes applicable: Output Tax (15%) and Excise Duty (1%)
2) Customer 01 is liable for both Output Tax and Excise Duty
3) Material A is liable for Output Tax, but not liable for Excise Duty. In material master, the tax classification is maintained as "0" for Output Tax (the first line) and "1" for Excise Duty (the 2nd line)
4) Material B is the opposite, i.e. liable for Output Tax but not liable for Excise Duty. In material master, the tax classification is maintained as "1" for Output Tax (the first line) and "0" for Excise Duty (the 2nd line)
5) The tax codes are defined (with tax % maintained) in FTXP
6) Pricing condition records are also maintained.
Now the issue is during order creation with Customer 01 and material A, both Output Tax and Excise Duty are getting calculated as Zero. Where as in case of material B, both taxes are getting calculated with value (15% and 1% respectively).
It seems that the system is getting the tax classification from the first tax (output tax) in material master and apply it to the other tax (excise duty). Therefore the Excise Duty gets the wrong value if the tax classification is different from that of the Output Tax.
Have anyone come across this issue before? Your help is much appreciated.
Thanks.

HI ,
thanks for your reply. In the meantime I figured out the issue myself. It was due to the access sequence that only checks tax classification 1 instead of 2 , 3 etc.
Thanks for your reply.
Dominique

Tax Classification of MMR

Dear Experts,
I have an issue with tax classification of material master ,
In MMR i have maintained three tax categories ,with deffreent tax classifiaction , and i want to access record of only one last 3rd tax classifiaction from MMR in sales order ,
but in my case in SO it is accessing 1st tax classifiation only , if i see in pricing analysis it is showing 1st classifiaction combination ,is missing where as i maintained record for 3rd tax classification combination it is not accessing in SO,
So anybody advoise how to solve this issue
Early reply will be appriceated
Caprin,,,,,,,,

Hi,
Laxmi
Thanks for u r reply
U r right, but ii my case system showing only 1st tax classification from MMR,for example,
1st is MWST tax category and classification code is E-Excise
2nd is UTXJ tax category and classification code is E-Excise
3 rd is ZYXJ tax category and classification code is 1-Normal
The above setting is in MMR,
and i have maintained condition record for 3rd condition type, When i create a SO system showing ZYXJ mandotory record is missing, it is showing missing for E combinastion in analyasis ,
Can you help me,how to access only 3rd tax condition record in SO
Caprin.......

Customer invoice - change of Tax classification required

Hi, I wonder if you can help with a query. For most customers we invoice outside the UK, we charge a VAT rate of 0%, which is linked to a tax classification in the customer master record (via XD03). In certain scenarios, we have to charge VAT for the same customer, for example if a training course is carried out for a foreign customer but the training takes place in the UK, we have to charge the UK standard rate of 17.5%. The way we have always achieve this, is that when we know we are going to invoice, we would change the tax classification in XD02, and then update the conditions tab on the sales order. This would in turn update the MWST percentage and allow us to charge the VAT, for this sales order only. The customer record would then be changed back to the previous code, once the invoice was issued.
For some reason this now no longer works. We have checked that the tax rates are set in VK13, and this all appears to look ok. The material codes in the sales orders have not been amended in any way so I do not think this is an issue.
This issue only seems to have occurred over the last few months.
Can anyone think of why?

Don't you feel the procedure you are following little to complicated for user when these can easily be determine through Condition record.
I would suggest, you can have 2 different sales area for the training sales in UK and outside (OT) sales.
Then, VAT tax classification
VAT - 0 - Not liable for Tax
VAT - 1 - Liable for Tax
And say, OT is your existing Sales area for the master data with tax classification VAT - 0 - Not liable for Tax. Then you to extend the customer master for UK sales
Sales org - Distri Channel
1000 - UK and there you maintain tax classification as VAT - 1 - Liable for Tax.
Here, we assume material tax classification is UK as VAT - 1 - Liable for Tax and OT is VAT - 0 - Not liable for Tax.
Now add an access to access sequence, say, Sales Org/ DC/ TaxClass1-Cust./ Tax class. material.
And maintain the condition record in VK11, say,
Not Liable for Tax - 1000 - UK - 1 - 1 = 17.5%
Liable for Tax - 1000 - OT - 0 - 0 = 0 %
And accordingly create you sales order with respective sales areas, w/o much manual intervention.
Hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Tax classification data is not saving in QAT

Hello Gurus,
I have a issue with tax classification data in Quality.
When i give tax classification data in developement server its saving the data , i transported the same request to quality here it is not saving the tax classification.
Note -In master data tax classification data is saving in delopement but its not saving master data tax classification data in quality.
looking for inputs.
Thank you all inadvance
Regards
venkat

Hi JP,
The relevant condition type are maintained in OVK1, OVK3, OVK4
the problem is still same,
Looking for some more inputs .
thanks&regards
venkat
Edited by: K.Venkata Chalapathi on Jul 31, 2010 3:16 PM

Error while sending PO (with tax code) from SSP to SUS via MM

Hello Experts
We are implementing Self Service Procurement and Supplier Self Services scenario.
We have created a SC with Tax Code say X in Self Service Procurement. The SC gets created as PO in R/3 (MM) system.
The IDoc which is getting created in the R/3 system has different segments than the one which gets created when we create the PO directly in R/3 system.
This IDoc which is seen in R/3 with the Status 26 - ' Error during syntax check of IDoc (outbound) '.
Please help, we are new to SSP.
Thanx and Regards
Gaurav
Edited by: Gaurav Giroti on Jan 29, 2009 1:36 PM
Edited by: Gaurav Giroti on Jan 29, 2009 1:37 PM

note 1311560 to be applied in ebp.

Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item with FM Active

Hi
We have fund management configured for one of the company code, while creating billing document through VF01/VF02 we are getting the Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item.
This error however does not appear when posting directly from FI with the same tax code.
I have tried to change the message control in which case i am getting a dump pointing to PSM-FM.
Please advise.
Regards
Sandeep

Hi:
          If you could please refer to the contents of OSS Note 112609 - How are tax codes transferred to conditions ?
"Symptom
If a billing document is transferred to accounting the system displays error messages. Transferring tax codes from tax conditions into the pricing conditions and discounts does not function as expected.
Other terms
FF805, FF747, FF753, MWSKZ, MWSK1, tax code
Reason and Prerequisites
The tax condition in the SD pricing procedure contains incorrect reference steps, there are several tax conditions in the pricing procedure of which the tax codes overwrite each other or a program error exists.
Solution
In the accounting document for a billing document, the different G/L account line items are provided with a tax code. The tax code of the G/L accounts is transferred from the tax condition(s) of the billing document. How are the tax codes of the tax conditions transferred into the other conditions of a billing document ?
Basically:
The conditions of a billing document are read from top to bottom. As soon as an active tax (inactive = ' ') is read, the system transfers the tax code of this tax into the non-tax conditions as follows:
    1. The reference steps (From-step, To-step) are read (the reference steps are defined in the pricing procedure).
    2. The tax code is transferred into all conditions, for which
    the step number of the condition lies in the pricing procedure between "From-step" and "To-step",
    the condition is not inactive (exactly: the inactive flag is not equal to A (Condition exclusion), M (Inactive due to manual entry), or X (Incorrect)),
    the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition),
    the condition is no tax condition.
After the transfer of the tax code the system searches for the next active tax. If further taxes are found, their tax code is again transferred according to the above procedure. If the reference steps of different taxes overlap, tax codes that have already been transferred are overwritten. To all non-tax conditions which in the pricing procedure stand after the last tax condition the tax code of the last active tax condition is transferred if they are not statistical.
Special features:
    1. If the "From-step" of a tax condition refers to a subtotal of the pricing procedure, the tax code of the tax is not only transferred into the conditions with step number between From-step and To-step but into all non-tax conditions for which
    the step number of the condition in the pricing procedure is lower than the "To-step" of the tax condition.
    the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition).
    the condition is not a tax condition.
    2. If the "To-step" of the tax condition is smaller than the "From-step", then the system sets "To-step = From-step".
Notes:
    1. As of Release 4.0 the tax code is no longer transferred in pricing but only when the billing document is released to accounting.
    2. If you use several taxes and tax codes and Customizing is incorrect for the release of billing documents to accounting, among others the system may display error message FF747.
    3. If there are several taxes in the pricing procedure refer to Notes 72173 and 82091 for Releases 3.0D - 3.1G. For Release 3.1H, only note 82091 is relevant.
    4. For conditions which are transferred into accounting (thus not statistical, not inactive conditions) and do not contain a tax code, the system searches for a default tax code which in Accounting Customizing can be set depending on the company code (tax code for non-taxable transactions). This applies to releases up to and including Release 4.5B. For Release 4.6, refer to Note 385127."
Regards

Error Posting with Tax Code

Hi Experts,
I have configured Travel Management for Canada with Tax Codes for Expense Type. Now, when i am trying to post to accounting using Tcode PRRW i am getting this error:
E RW609 Error in document: TRAVL 0000000011 ECDCLNT100
E RW619 Combination of transaction key NVP and tax code is wrong
Have we missed anything, please provide your inputs.
Regards,
KOutilya A.K

Hi,
Just Check these notes whether is it useful.
Note -- 1109348, 979102, 884311.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
S.Srikanth

Dispaly material with key field customer based on tax classification

Hello all,
Material is classified based on tax classification as products and goods.I need to dispaly these of either for some customers.
Client is saying me to use the table MLAN(Tax Classification for material).
Can anybody suggest me how can i pull the material part/service part(matnr) from the table (MLAN) based on tax classification(TAXKM) with key field customer(KUNNR) when this table does not have customer has key field in it.
Thank you,
Sirisha

Hello all/Brad,
Requirement is , i need to add and dispaly material data in a column with heading as tax classification in ALV Report for the customer.
Ex: Customer 11094 brings material 336047-B21(Product)
Customer 10973 brings material LDMSPMAP-M (Service)
Material is classified as per the tax classification as Product and Service. If tax classification is 1 then it is Product and if the tax classification is 2 then it is Service.
So i'm trying to pull the material(Product/Service) based on tax classification with customer as key field.
Customer is coming from customer master data.
So i have used MARA table which has all three fields (Customer,Material,Tax classification) to get the required information but the table does not have test data for customer.So i told my client to update mara table with customer and tax classification data.
But my client told me to use MLAN table because they have updated the data in this table.But unfortunately this table doesn't have customer field to pull the data.
So that is the reason, i put the above question in the forum.
PLease help me in solving this issue.
Thank you,
Sirisha

Getting Communication error with the external tax system(VERTEX_MS0018)

Hi All,
I am a new SAP HCM self learner. I am practicing it on company's sandbox system. When I am trying to create a company and saving the address, it is returning Communication error with the external tax system(VERTEX_MS0018). I have already tried to solve is issue by going thru previous related to same issue like
Communication error with the external tax system (VERTEX_MS0018) ...Urgent
but coudn't solve the issue.
Please help. Is this issue coming as I am using a training environment? any alternate approach?

Hi Ravi,
To disable the connection to Vertex:
Goto tcode SPRO > Cross Application Components > Transaction Tax Engine >
Technical Settings> Define External Tax System
Here an RFC would be defined. Remove it and try again.
Also in SPRO > Cross Application Components > Tax Determination based on Jurisdiction Codes > External Tax Jurisdiction > Activate External Tax Jurisdiction.
Remove the entry 'V' here.
Regards,
Srikishan

Communication error with the external tax system(vertex_ms0018)

Hi All
I have installed ECC6 IDES S/W on my PC. I have activated SAP Insurance module (FS-CD). When I try to create business partner using FPP1 with US address, It is throwing error as follows:
"communication error with the external tax system(vertex_ms0018)"
I dont want to use any external Tax system like Vertex etc. because I am not calculating any taxes.
I gave correct US address with valid ZIP etc. but no use.
Please help me if any one of you has idea. How to overcome this error. How to deactivate connection to external tax system.
Your help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Giri

Hi Giri,
I've notice that you took the 'V' from the configuration but you left the RFC destination.
Clearly the RFC destination is not working thus the reason you get the error (in your case, your server can't determine a valid IP address for the host iwdf8334.wdf.sap.corp).
To sort out the problem you got I can think of at least two ways:
1. Get the RFC connection working (get the correct setup for it) using transaction SM59
2. Or if you don't really need the external tax calculations, remove the RFC configuration from TAXUJ under Assign RFC Destination to Country on the Cross-Application SPRO entry.
3. You can always add TAXUS to transaction OBBG if you require it (as it comes out of the box).
This should fix the problem you are having but I'm assuming you don't need the external tax calculations.
If you do, just fix the connection using SM59 (you may want to ask for help from your Basis team if you don't know how to do it).
Cheers
Jorge Laranjo
[email protected]
+44 741 847 5946

Error cannot book in doc with this classification

Hi,
I get this error when trying to save a document "cannot book in doc with this classification" Please assits.
Regards
Scharlotte

Dear Scharlotte
After reading your explanation, I understand, your issue is related to storage category. Please check your configuration again.
Do you have separate content server or you are checking-in to R/3 server?
Regards
Amaresh Makal

Error with tax classification

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for