ESET Mobile Security and WLAN

If you delete ESET Mobile Security in your phone, WLAN don´t work.

phonehacker wrote:
LOL you don't need antivirus. read this http://3lib.ukonline.co.uk/viruses.htm
is this applied all S60 devices, such as S60 5th edition? (X6,N97,5800,etc.)
Glad to help

Similar Messages

WLAN and ESET Mobile Security

A few weeks ago, I had a problem with WLAN on my phone Nokia E71; I was using the application ESET Mobile Security, and when i delete this application, the WLAN don´t work. Now, I reinstalled this application and WLAN is working fine. I recommend be carefull with this antivirus.

phonehacker wrote:
LOL you don't need antivirus. read this http://3lib.ukonline.co.uk/viruses.htm
is this applied all S60 devices, such as S60 5th edition? (X6,N97,5800,etc.)
Glad to help

ACS 4.1 Server and WLAN Bridge

Hi,
we have a Cisco Bridge (with 1310Gs)and have the problem that the non root bridge does not reach the ACS server with its authentication requests (when we use OPEN authentication the bridge works fine).
The authentication requests by the root Bridge are passed to ACS w/o any problems.
How can I tell the Root Bridge to pass on the AUTH-requests by the Non Root Bridge to ACS ? (we do not even see any failed requests from the NON Root AP on ACS - nothing arrives there...). Thanks for helping.
Cheers,
T.

Following would be the right section to put this question,
Wireless - Mobility | Security and Network Management.
As issue is not with ACS, but with the way communication takes place between root and non root bridge.
Regards,
Prem

NQ Mobile Security & Antivirus - Worth checking out...

Recently I have been investigating a new method of protecting my device since the latest DKFBootkit malware threat brought to light, at the moment only rooted device are the only ones effected by this malware but since hackers are becoming more and more familiar with methods to attack Android users...
I decided to try NQ Mobile Security and Antivirus app from the market and it appears rather impressive from first impression, I really love the option to control data use and also the detail list of all devices rights to curtain information on your device, like contact info, email, locations and so on..
Check it out at https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nqmobile.antivirus20&feature=search_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwyLDEsImNvbS5ucW1vYmlsZS5hbnRpdmlydXMyMCJd

I've heard that NQ isn't bad. There's also Kaspersky & another one that people tend to like but dagnabit if it isn't escaping me at the moment. Sure there's the standard Lookout & Avast! out there but this was yet another one. Maybe it was Bitdefender? Oh that's going to drive me batty now.
ANYWHO...I actually found an article comparing the various apps out there. I wonder if I can find it again. They did some pretty extensive "testing" of the various apps out there. I currently have AVG and I'm about to dump it because of the testing and go with either Avast! or perhaps Kaspersky. I haven't decided yet. May look into NQ again. I already have a Norton's thingy-ma-bob on my phone but haven't ditched it yet. Probably could.
I'll see if I can find that article this evening or tomorrow if you're interested.

Quick Hit Update: Verizon Wireless Launches Mobile Security App for Android

We recently shared with you information on the growing Malware threat to PCs, Macs and mobile devices, and today, Verizon Wireless announced the latest weapon to help you combat this digital epidemic -- Verizon Mobile Security. This new app -- which can be downloaded from the Verizon Channel in Google Play onto more than 30 Android Smartphones -- delivers a choice of three security service options to help you better safeguard your Android devices from digital threats such as malicious links in emails or potentially unsafe apps to physical threats as a result of a misplace or lost phone.
Click here to learn more about Verizon Mobile Security, and here to learn more about how you can keep your Smartphone safe.

At the moment, In Home Agent and FIOS Mobile on my Windows 10 laptop is functional. Rather, I can download them from the Google Play Store, but you won't find them on the Microsoft App store. Neither program installs. Additionally, I cannot get Outlook 2010 to download or upload mail from the POP or SMTP servers respectively using the setting precribed on the Verizon web site. While there are other issues with Window 10 and third party software, these seem to be Verizon-related.

Secure and guest wlans on same ap ?

Dear Netprof,
Have a query on the installation of a new wireless pilot, I have currently specified several cisco 1230 AP's and a single acs to handle secure wlan access. However I now need to cater for visitors, that we ideally need to keep on their own 'unsecure' wlan (as the card they use may not support leap). Is it possible to configure this on a single ap (3 or these for the pilot) or do I need an exclusive ap configured separately with its own ssid and wlan / vlan.
Thanks in advance.
Adrian.

You can create VLANs on any AP, one for guests (no authentication, broadcast SSID) and one (or more) for employees (LEAP/PEAP authentication, no broadcast SSID). And, as ME said, authentication type vwiil apply according to each SSID settings.
Good Luck,
Srdja

I have a MacBook Air with OS X and am having trouble accessing the ADT Pulse Home Security System cameras. The mobile (iPhone and iPad) apps allow access no problem, but I can't get a picture on the MacBook. Have tried Safari and Firefox browsers.

I have a MacBook Air with OS X and am having trouble accessing the ADT Pulse Home Security System cameras. The mobile (iPhone and iPad) apps allow access no problem, but I can't get a picture on the MacBook. Have tried Safari and Firefox browsers. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks.

From a Catherine to Katherine -- Had the exact same problem!! I had to enable Java twice - both in Safari and then on the MacBookAir itself.

Endpoint Assessment with ASA and Eset Smart Security

Hi,
I am trying to get ASA Endpoint Assessment working on a ASA 5510 with Eset Smart Secuirty VER 4.
It works great with Eset Smart-Security Version 3., but I am unable to get it working with Version 4.
From a "debug dap trace" it appears the variables are populated with bad information :
endpoint.as["SpyBot"].timestamp="1223424000";
endpoint.av["WmiAV"]={};
endpoint.av["WmiAV"].exists="true";
endpoint.av["WmiAV"].description="Eset unknown product";
endpoint.av["WmiAV"].version="4.0";
endpoint.av["WmiAV"].activescan="ok";
endpoint.av["WmiAV"].lastupdate="";
endpoint.av["WmiAV"].timestamp="";
Is there anything I can do ?
Any help, really appreciated.
Thanks
Matt
I am running 8.0(4) with csd_3.4.0373.pkg.
Endpoint Assessment 2.5.14.3

Hello Tarik,
Thanks for the info.
The clients are able to login. And in the ESET Smart Security configuration, the nac client application is added to the firewall rules which make nac active whatever the ports is used by the client.
Thanks
Patrick Y.

Wireless guest wlan and secured corporate wlan

I am implementing an enterprise wireless network for my company. I am planning on setting up one secured corporate wlan for employee and one open guest wlan for the guest/contractor/vendor. Is there a way I can prevent my employee jump from the secured wlan to the guest wlan? Thanks.
Lee

Hi stepehen
LWAPP also defines the tunneling mechanism for data traffic.
A LAP discovers a controller with the use of LWAPP discovery mechanisms. The LAP sends an LWAPP join request to the controller. The controller sends the LAP an LWAPP join response, which allows the AP to join the controller. When the LAP joins to the controller, the LAP downloads the controller software if the revisions on the LAP and controller do not match. Subsequently, the LAP is completely under the control of the controller. LWAPP secures the control communication between the LAP and the controller by means of a secure key distribution. The secure key distribution requires already provisioned X.509 digital certificates on both the LAP and the controller. Factory-installed certificates are referenced with the term "MIC", which is an acronym for Manufacturing Installed Certificate. Cisco Aironet APs that shipped before July 18, 2005, do not have a MIC. So these APs create a self-signed certificate (SSC) when they are upgraded in order to operate in lightweight mode. Controllers are programmed to accept SSCs for the authentication of specific APs.
Pls Refer the docu..
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6306/products_qanda_item09186a00806a4da3.shtml
Regds
Saji k.s

X3500 No Connection between LAN and WLAN

Hello,
I've purchased and installed an x3500 modem, and can connect to internet using both wired and wireless but my problem is, i can not ping or see/detect devices between LAN and WLAN.How can i fix this problem?
Mac filtering is disabled on wireless
both gets ip from dhcp

Hi hakanbayar. Can you ping your Linksys device? If yes and you're using a computer, you may need to disable the computer firewall or security so it will allow you to ping other computers.

WiSM redundancy, mobility groups and RF groups

Hi there
we would like to implement the following:
- Support for about 2000 LAP's
- 1 x Catalyst 6509
- 1 x Sup 720
- 7 x WiSM's
What I'm interesting is are the following points:
1. I thought that we would build the switch completly redudant, so we have to wlan switches (switch A and B) with 7 WiSM's eatch. So I can garanty a N+N redundancy --> each LAP's has a primary controller on switch A and it's secondary controller on switch B. The LAP's can be splitted on the two switches, but for your understanding there is a 1:1 redundancy. What do you think of this design, is the too much or is this appropriate?
2. As I know you can build up a mobility group of a maximum of 24 controllers or 12 WiSM's. I would put only these controllers in a mobility group, where Layer 2 roaming can occure.
3. But what is about the RF groups - there is a maximum of 1000 LAP's, so I can put only 3 WiSM's in one group. But this would not work form me, then I would have 2 WiSM's on switch A and only 1 WiSM on switch B in a RF group (not a 1:1 redundancy). First is it possible to put WiSM-A and WiSM-B into different RF groups, I think so because they are logically splitted, aren't they?
And what RF group design would be best (just as a reference)? I thought that it would make sense to form a RF group for each of the seven pairs (1 WiSM on switch A and 1 WiSM on switch B) for redundancy? What do you think of that approach?
4. So I would have 1 mobility group and 7 RF groups. Or do you recommend to form the mobility groups like the RF groups? But what happens with Layer 2 roaming in that case?
I'm sorry for the long and messy text, but I hope you can see my design questions?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Dominic

It sounds like you already have some good replies. Personally I like N+1 redundancy, but that is a designers choice. One thing I should point out is that the 6500 can only support 5 WiSM cards each. In this case a 4 WiSM x 3 chassis option would give your more spare capacity with only 12 total cards. The lower WiSM cost (12 vs 14) would help offset the cost of the extra chassis. You could also support 2400 APs with 8 WiSM cards even if one switch is down.
Not too long ago Cisco added the ability to set the priority of APs so your critical ones would join a controller and the less critical ones would go down if a controller failed and there were no redundancy. That is something to keep in mind when designing wireless. You may not need redundancy for all APs and that could affect your design and costs.
Randy

The packet data and wlan connection runs automatia...

guys guys guys i'm having a wiered problem with this rubish E72
well every time i check my log i find that my phone has used packet data connections and wlan connections for small time intervals and small periods while i haven't used the internet for a long time btw i always make sure to exit all app and also make sure to disconnect my email before exiting so packet data signals and wlan signal are not (on)
so that means that the phone just uses internet by it's own self also notice that the time that the phone used the internet was during my sleep time
but it's so weired it has used the packet data for 30 seconds and the wlan fo 1.5 mins by it self ..............is this a virus or that ugly firmware is just full of **bleep**
please check your phones (log) and reply me back
thank you
Nokia E72-1 Black
firmware : 053.001
of 26 of nov 2010

well for the ovi sync i really use that app to sync my contacts and calender and it set to manual sync so i guess it wouldn't go by it self
as for the wlan data and packet data , last night was ok withou any connection don't know how
or what happened it seems the problem is solved but i will also make sure tonight of the problem still exist or not
all i did last night i have installed 2 app (m.gaurd(netqin) and kaspersky antivirus) to scan my mobile and it did but it seems that its slowind down my already slow mobile
and removed them today because they corrupted the interface of my snaptu application which i use for facebook (the highlight color disappeared but it was still working) so i had to uninstall it and reinstall back again
Nokia E72-1 Black
firmware : 053.001
of 26 of nov 2010

ESET Smart Security says there's a trojan in the plugin for Firefox

I'm trying to install the Flash plug-in for Firefox and after being forced to use the dumb DLM, the DLM downloads the plugin and tries to install it but my ESET Smart Security throws up a message:
A variant of Win32//TrojanDropper.Agent.OVE trojan
has been found and has been cleaned by deleting
So basically I'm not able to install the plug-in for Firefox.
What gives?

You can hide the box that shows the snippets with code in userChrome.css
Add code to [http://kb.mozillazine.org/UserChrome.css userChrome.css] below the @namespace line.
<pre><nowiki>@namespace url("http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul"); /* only needed once */
#snippetContainer {display: none !important; }</nowiki></pre>
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing_configuration
* ChromEdit Plus: http://webdesigns.ms11.net/chromeditp.html

SAP Mobile Documents and Citrix NetScaler

Hi all,
we're aiming to implement a secure Mobile Documents server that is protected from the Internet via a solution in the DMZ. We are eschewing a reverse proxy and are going for a Citrix NetScaler instead. Has anyone tried this combination before and if yes do you have any recommendations? I'm grateful for any tips in this direction.
Best regards,
Daniel

Hello Daniel,
Happy to hear you are going to implement Mobile Documents. There are for sure certain advantages Citrix NetScaler brings. Below I am not going to argue against or pro this product.
Beside the bunch of features you may enable to secure and monitor the traffic and prevent attacks, let me enumerate some you may want to pay attention to.
- Content Streaming. A domain where some proxy come short due to the fact that not only do not support streaming but use also the main memory for caching.
- URL rewriting. If you get problems here you can configure the URL rewriting directly in Mobile documents
- Compressing. If this already happens on the NetWeaver stack, make sure you don't do it twice.
- Security protections. We already have protections in place against SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks for example, make sure that you don't kill the response times by throwing everything at hand.
- Authentication. If no VPN is configured or a second factor is used for the authentication, make a trust between the systems to avoid double authentication.
Good Luck and please share your experience.
Regards,
Corneliu

Mobility Secure Mode

Hello,
We are working with WLC 5508 version 7.0.98.0 and we want to secure (encrypt) mobility messages between controllers but the command "config mobility secure-mode enable" apparently doesn't exist in this WLC version.
Does anybody know how to configure secure mode for mobility messages (udp port 16667) on this WLC version?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Mario

Hi Mario,
This is not possible anymore. If you check the 7.0 config guide there is no mention of secure mode anymore.
In the 5.1-5.2-6.0 config guides, they added a note to say that the secure mode was not supported even if command was present in command line.
So this is not configurable since some versions already.
I heard something is coming to replace this need but no idea what it will be yet.
Regards,
Nicolas
===
Please rate posts that you find useful

ESET Mobile Security and WLAN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for