Evaluation path OM

Dear Experts,
I have problem to determine what evaluation path to  use  to find  Relationships from org. unit   "up"& "down". What I have now separate relationship from om Higher level organizational units and Below level organizational units. I need  a single evaluation path because I want to track staff org unit..
TQ in advance

Like Volker said OOAW is good place to browse through different evaluation paths. I like using PPST (or report RHSTRU00) to test those evaluation paths. In your case O-O seems to return higher org. units and O-O_DOWN the lower level org. units.
By studying different evaluation paths in OOAW and testing them in PPST it is soon pretty easy to come up with your own design if there is no standard evaluation path available. Technically evaluation paths just reads relationships between objects in table HRP1001.
'saq

Similar Messages

  • Report RHSTRU00 with Evaluation Path BOSSORG is not working

    Hello Friends,
    I am trying to run the Report RHSTRU00 with Evaluation Path BOSSORG  and it never produces output. If I run the report with any  other Evaluation path,it works......
    Can anybody help me in this issue,
    Thanks
    Kisu

    solved on own.

  • Regarding Evaluation path used in Organisation structure.

    Dear All,
    How would i be able to get to know the evaluation path used by organisational structure to display the structure. What i found in tcode : ppome is that it is showing evaluation but not path name. I want to know the reference path name which it is using.
    Thanks,
    Raj

    Hi
    Check the Report:
    RHINFAW0 - Infotype reporting.
    Regards,
    Sreeram

  • Evaluation paths in MSS

    Hi
    Our client is using "matrix" relationships A/B002 (is line supervisor of) in their organisation and wants to display them in MSS (latest version) teamviewer. We are using evaluation path WF_POSIT (User/person has as position)as rule for root objects and ORGA-P (Supervisory and subordinate positions with person display) as rule for target objects. However we are only able to show relationships 002 which are below the manager's position in the organisation and not those which are elsewhere in the organisation. This worked before with the client before our upgrade project.
    Can you advise if it's possible to show the 002 (is line supevisor of) relationships in MSS from all over the organisational structure (not only below the manager) with these evaluation paths or should some others be used?
    We can only see the 002's below the manager with or without structural authorizations and before the upgrade the evaluation paths were not modified from standard and permitted relationships are also the same.
    Any thoughts would be helpful.
    -JT

    Hello Raj,
    you need so called Structural Authorizations to accomplish your requirenment. But be aware this has a direct effect on your entire HR-based Authorization concept in your company if you switch it on!
    To activate Structural Authorizations call transaction OOAC and set the switch for ORGPD to a proper value which does meet your needs. (See http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c7/4aba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm) If it is already set to a value <> 0 is is already activated.
    The next thing you need to do is to maintain your Manager Role. The authorization object in question is P_ORGIN. If you want for instance to give a user read access to Infotype 0001 of another person you provide the following values:
    - AUTHC: R
    - INFTY: 0001
    - PERSA: *
    - PERSG: *
    - PERSK: *
    - SUBTY: *
    - VDSK1: *
    If you would stop here, every user would have access to Infotype 0001 of any other Person in your company. But as you want to restirct the access to just persons which lay within you evalution path B002, you have to maintain tables T77PR and T77UA.
    T77PR: Create a Profile (e.g. name it My Team or something) and add the following values: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/34/49ba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    - Planversion: 01 (most likely)
    - Object Type: O
    - Evalution Patch: <Hint> You cant use B002 directly as B002 just give objects of type O back, but you  need object of type P. Use SBES for instance.
    - Status Vector: 12
    - Depth: 0
    - Function Module: RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT (Gives you the root object where to start the evaluation with path SBES.
    Now you need to assign your users (in your case your managers) to this profile. Use table T77UA to do this.
    Thats it
    regards
    Markus

  • Issue with Evaluation Path

    Hi All,
    I had created one Evaluation Path P-P.
    I want to retrieve all employees who are reporting to a particulat employee...
    ex: A is the manager
    B , C, D are team leads.
    Again B is having 2 more employees.. B1,B2...
    So when we execute for employee A all the B,C,D,B1,B2 need to be displayed. and I created the ZTEST ev path..
    code of EV:
    P B 008 S -> Geeting 'a' position
    S B 005 S  -> getting A' sub-ordinates positions
    S A008 P ->  sub-ordinate positions
    and it is succesfully executed in PPSS..
    i HAVE WRITEN A SAMPLE PROGRAM to test that...
    eX:
    GET OBJEC.
    WRITE: OBJEC-OTYPE , OBJEC-OBJID.
    but system is going infinite loop and giving the following error...
    "\FUNCTION-POOL=RHAS\DATA=STRU_VERK[]"
    Let me know whats wrong here.. and more over issue is person to person retrieve is not possible?
    Regards
    Sas

    Hi.
    What's wrong is this:
    P B 008 S -> Geeting 'a' position
    S A008 P -> sub-ordinate positions
    You are using two opposite links in the same WEGID, so this is what leads to the infinite loop. You should get rid of the first one and always start to evaluate with the current position of the manager.
    S B 005 S -> getting A' sub-ordinates positions
    S A008 P -> sub-ordinate positions

  • Error with Recursive Evaluation Path in PD Profile

    Dear Experts,
    I’m facing an issue using a recursive evaluation path inside a PD profile (transaction OOSP). My scenario is that a Central Person (CP) object is linked by 2 Person (P) objects.  I want the PD profile to give access to 2 Person (P) objects as long as I have access to either 1 of the Person (P) object. I have an evaluation path that is created using transaction OOAW as follows:
    10 P     A 209     * CP
    20 CP       B 209     * P
    The problem that I’m encountering is that the P object goes through a recursive loop during the evaluation path, i.e. the 2 P objects that are evaluated as output gets passed in as inputs again and go into a loop continuously. Is there a way to resolve this recursive issue or other alternative resolution that could meet my requirements? Thanks.

    Use field "Function Module" of table T77PR. You can program what you want yourself. Use function module RH_STRUC_GET to get the CP from the P, and then again RH_STRUC_GET to get the P from the CP. Add the resultings P to the output parameter. Press F1 on the field to see how the FB should look like.

  • HR - Evaluation Path Issue

    Hi ,
    There is a custom FM which is using  std FM   RH_STRUC_GET_MULTIPLE_ROOTS' to get back hierarchy of organisation .
    A custom evaluation path has been created and is being used - ZX.
    Now RH_STRUC_GET_MULTIPLE_ROOTS' is returning incorrect results. I need to check whether the evaluation path is defined properly. looks like there is an error in definition which might be causing this problem.
    I have no idea how evaluation path works. Could you please let me know the tcode where i could check on the custom evaluation path and rectify the error?
    Thanks in advance

    thanks for the reply.
    I can see the evaluation path in table t778a. In tcode ppss i do not know what the object id and object type for the evaluation path are?
    Any idea if there is any other way to check details?

  • T-code of the window where it asks for evaluation path.

    Hi,
    I want the T-code of that window where it asks for evaluation path. I want to generate the report in OM

    Hi,
    If you are creating repoert through HIS tool, you can use OODS T code to declare the Evaluation path.
    Tomesh

  • Evaluation path to get personnel number all the org unit and subordinates

    Dear all,
    I have OM issue to ask.This is the scenario:
    Staff A  belong to  org 1. Under Org  1, I  have org unit 1-A, 1-B and org unit 1-C.
    Issue 1 :
    I want to run report(RHSTRU00) to  to generate all the staff number in org 1 (Include 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C).
    Issue 2 :
    I  want to run report for 1-A, only staff belongs in org 1-A appear.The others not appear.
    I was understanding I have to play around with evaluation path. Until now I can't find the suitable evaluation_path. I need your help.tq

    Hi,
    Not sure why you want to reinvent the wheel.  The standard report RHXSTRU02 will give you people by Org Unit.  Just enter the Org Unit ID number and you will get the employees as output.
    If you still want to use RHSTRU00, you can use O-P or O-S-P to get the employees and the positions.
    Paul

  • How to create own evaluation path

    Hi Experts
    Can anyone of the HR experts let me know how to create own evaluation path to be used in Function Module 'RH_STRUC_GET'.
    Thanx,
    Rahul

    Hi
    To maintain evaluation paths, choose the IMG activity SAP Web Application Server ® Business Management ® SAP Business Workflow ® Basic Settings (Organizational management) ® Number range maintenance ® Maintain evaluation paths. When the system is in operation, use transaction OOAW .
    Here you will find the maintenance view Change evaluation paths: Overview.
    Assign a name to the evaluation path (maximum of eight alphanumeric characters).
    Go to the dependent view Evaluation paths (individual maintenance).
    Describe the relationship chain to be used for the evaluation.
    To establish the permitted relationships for an object type, use report RHRELAT0 .
    REWARD POINTS

  • MSS Team View evaluation path for non chief positions (s-s)

    Hello,
    We have a problem with display of employees under non chief manager - reporting managers (connection A002). In our organization we have line managers and under them team managers who are leading team of employees. Those managers want to see their employees under MSS Team View iView.
    I have checked forum posts and try to create correct evaluation path but i didn't get results yet. I have created 2 evaluation paths:
    Z_MANG (copy of SAP_MANG):
    10 *     B 008      S
    20 S    B 002      S
    30 US  A 208 P
    Z_S-S (copy of MSSDIREC):
    10 S  A 002     S
    20 S  A 008     P
    30 S  A 008     US
    I also included them into rules so:
    Root rule (rule 1) - Z_MANG
    Target rule (rule 3) - Z_S-S
    I have also done customizing under Object and Data provider and if I choose standard evaluation paths (e.g. SAP_MANG and MSSDIREC), I get employees shown - if I give manager a hat (A012 connection).
    Could you please help me with advice, where am I wrong? I think that first evaluation path (Z_MANG) is ok and it finds non chief manager, maybe is a problem with second one that don't show employees?
    Thank you for answers in advance.
    Best regards,
    David

    My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
    S A 002 Reports (line) or
    S B 002 Is line supervisor
    but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
    you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
    say you have four levels  why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
    say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
          2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
          3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
    this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
    ...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

  • Evaluation Path for View of Organizational Structure

    Hi all,
    I am trying to define new VIEWID using EVPATH which would do the following filtering (by using f.m. HRWPC_GET_NAV_SUBTREE): giving org.unit number, it would return employees of current org unit and in case that there are some sub org units  which dont have the boss also all employees of those org units and in case that the sub org. unit have the boss only the boss.
    I saw there is Evaluation path SBES, which shows me the employees of given org unit, or SBESX which gives all including suborgs, but I cannot find Ev. path which will do more complicated conditions.
    I can see EVPATH only on T778A table with short description, is there any other way to see them with more details?
    Thank you and best regards,
    Anna

    Hi Anna,
    You will find all the existing eval paths in table T778A itself.
    I am not sure if you have seen the individual maintenance too.
    You can also create your own eval paths acc to your requirement too.
    But as far as i know all the things wrt to eval paths can be managed there itself
    Hope it helps!
    Regards,
    SR

  • FM or BAPI - get objects with evaluation path

    Hi guys
    In my last course HR350 we used a function module to get all object with an evaluation path  in OM..
    I just dont know this FM anymore and cant find it.
    Which FM do i need for to get all objects for the evaluation path "L-D-E"
    thanks!

    Hi Thomas,
    Pls try function modules
    HRWPC_EVAL_PATH
    HRHAP_SEL_OBJECTS_OF_EVAL_PATH
    Regards,
    Dilek

  • RH_COST_CENTER_RESPONSIBLE Evaluation Path

    Hi,
    I am working on an organizational structure change and want to ensure that changes are reflected correctly in various workflows. I found that the central function module for determining approvers is
    RH_COST_CENTER_RESPONSIBLE
    . The problem is that SAP has hardcoded the evaluation path and also left no options to enhance the evaluation path CC_RESP. Can it be correct that the only option to adjust the evaluation path is through modifying the standard function module!?
    Anyone who has an explanation why SAP has developed the code like that? Perhaps there is a deeper meaning in always using evaluation path CC_RESP?
    Thanks!
    Elvez

    Hi,
    use this FM:
    BAPI_COSTCENTER_GETDETAIL1
    You have the responsible in the export parameter field: COSTCENTERDETAIL-PERSON_IN_CHARGE
    BR,
    Luisen

  • How to determine Evaluation Path(WEGID)

    Hi All,
            I am using FM /ISDFPS/FORCE_STRUC_GET in order to get all the elements under a particular force element  In TCODE /ISDFPS/TOE1. Here is the code :
                CALL FUNCTION '/ISDFPS/FORCE_STRUC_GET'
                  EXPORTING
                    act_otype      = 'O'
                    act_objid      = objid
                    act_wegid      = O-O_DOWN
                  IMPORTING
                    act_plvar      = 01
                  TABLES
                    result_objec   = lt_objec
                    result_struc   = lt_struc
                  EXCEPTIONS
                    no_plvar_found = 1
                    root_not_found = 2
                    path_not_found = 3
                    internal_error = 4
                    OTHERS         = 5.
    However using wegid O-O_DOWN does not give all the elements under the node (objid or Force element).
    How do I know which wegid ( Evaluation path) is to be used . How can it be determined?
    Thanks ,
    Vasuki

    This sounds like something a functional consultant should be able to answer. Hope someone is around, otherwise it might just be a matter of trial and error via the transaction you have mentioned. Normally in HR that is, where these kind of FM is used as well, the description of the evaluation path is quite comprehensive. Based on that and the transaction code I always just give it a try and see what evaluation path gives the output I want. But the best alternative would be that functional consultant.

  • Succession planning the Evaluation path

    What evaluation path is used for Succession planning to determine the structure, IN OC we know it is standard delivered
    MSS_OCI_MIN

    Hi Siddharth,
    STVN SuccessionPlanning 3.0 SP2 uses the HR-OCI view TMC_O_S_CP_ORG. The parent view is TMC_O_S_CP_SUPO. For 3.0 (and I believe SP1) it uses TMC_O_SUCC_T.
    Best regards,
    Luke

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem seeing a jframe components

    Hello, My problem is this. I have a main jframe. Now on my main jframe i have to do a time expensive procedure called refresh(); While this procedure is running i want to display a message in a JWindow that says "Please wait". Problem is that no matt

  • Old Apple TVs and new Macbook

    I have 3 gen 1 apple TVs and a new MacAir.  It works fine for sharing movies, but I can no longer access the disk space on my apple TVs to erase movies or add movies.  I take my laptop to work everyday, so my kids cannot watch new content when I am g

  • How do I get my ex boyfriend to stop using my account

    how to get someone to stop using your account?

  • I have populated data but getting error in uploading the same

    Hi all,         I am working with BADI HRHAP00_ENHANCE_FIX(Method - ENAHANCE_DOCUMENT).I got all Qs related to QH using rh_struc_get(evaluation path - QUALCATA) . Now , we have to get STEXT from HRP1000 9Done this).And for Tline, we get tabnr from HR

  • Flatten Form field Only or specific field

    I'm doing a PDF Form for a client. The client will use Adobe Reader XI to enter the data and save the results. I was using a button with a javascript to flatten the form field and do a save as. Everything work fine until I discovered that the flatten