Exchange 2010 Emails relay to different server

Hi Guys
We are having some trouble in emails. We have hosted exchange for customer. The same Exchange Server(2010) hosts emails for company as well.
We migrate the email and accounts to hosted exchange from other mail server(exchange,google etc)
I need to migrate a new customer to hosted exchange but before that I need to migrate few accounts for testing. The issues I need to address is that as soon as I will migrate one mailbox to our hosted exchange, any emails sent to that users from our company
email address will be routed internally. 
For Example
There is a customer with email : [email protected] and is hosted within their own exchange(ExchangeServe1)
We have a Hosted Exchange(ExchangeServer2) server which hosts our emails and we offer email solution to customers.
When I will migrate [email protected] into our Exchange server(Exchange Server2) and if after migration I want to send some email from my company email address(Exchange Server2)  exchange will do internal routing and forward email to [email protected] which is
in the same exchange server(ExchangeServer2).
But I want exchange to forward email to existing customer exchange server(ExchangeServer1).
We are not changing MX record yet so incoming emails from anywhere else would be fine except when we will send emails from our company emails addresses to abc.com domain.
So my question, How do I configure our exchange that it does not send emails to an organization configured in the same exchange server.

you can do this manually with a contact on the old exchange server and a transport rule to forward a copy to the new server you will have to come up with a unique name for the new server at least on a temporary basis maybe a sub domain.
you could also remove the allowed domain name of this customer from your server this is how exchange determined delivery.

Similar Messages

  • Close Exchange 2010 Open Relay

    Hello,
    I am experimenting and trying to setup an exchange 2010 server to use with my personal domain. Let's make the following assumptions:
    Domain: domain.com
    Mail Server address: mail.domain.com
    My mail server sends emails using my ISP's SMTP server (suppose smtp.isp.com) as a smart host.
    My problem is that my exchange server seems to work like an open relay. If I use telnet to connect to mail.domain.com:25, I can send email from any to any address. What I'd like to do is to require some kind of authentication so only users that have mailboxes
    on my server can send email using mail.domain.com's SMTP.
    I believe the reason this happens is because I have enabled Anonymous users in the "Client" and "Default" Receive connectors. If I disable the Anonymous users though, I cannot receive emails from the internet. For example, a @gmail user
    won't be able to send an email to a user in my domain.
    How could I achieve my aim to restrict the SMTP relay to authenticated users but still be able to receive emails from the internet?

    Hi,
    As far as I know, there are two relay type:  authenticated relaying and anonymous or open relaying. And I recommend you use authenticated relaying which allows your internal users to send mail to domains outside of your Exchange organization,
    but requires authentication before the mail is sent.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2006/12/28/3397620.aspx
    Thanks,
    Angela Shi
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 Email not Syncing, but Contacts and Calendar do???

    Anyone have any feedback on this? I have tried deleting and readding my Exchange 2010 account several times and same result.
    No emails are displaying at all. However, all of my contacts are appearing in the contacts app and so are calendar entries. Also, when I go into the settings and choose which folders to have push email, I see a list of all of my exchange folders, so I know it is seeing the server.
    Any idea why the emails are not appearing? I have tried all combinations of different settings and can't get them to appear.
    Thanks

    Are either of you part of protected groups in active directory/exchange? Such as the built ins. i.e Domain Admin/Account Operator etc?

  • On-premise Exchange 2010 SMTP Relay to O365 mailboxes does not resolve Display Name

    Dear All,
    We have SMTP relay receive connector in our on-premise Exchange 2010 server that accepts emails from anonymous users.
    The Externally Secured check box is checked. Display Name of the sender in Emails to mailboxes in on-premise is resolved correctly. 
    But the display name of the sender in the same email to mailboxes which are migrated to O365 is not getting resolved.
    Please let me know if anyone has seen this issue. Some of our mailboxes are in O365 and some are in On-premise server.
    Thanks
    Fred

    Do you have a hybrid configuration set up, and if not, is there any particular reason?
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Exchange 2010 Tracking Delivery to Remote Server

    We're partway through a migration from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2013. Currently we have our Exchange 2010 environment up and running for several weeks.
    I'm trying to determine how to use the message tracking in Exchange 2010 to verify delivery of mail to a remote server.  In the 2003 message tracking I'd enter the recipient and the tool would check the logs and show if the message was successfully
    transferred to the remote host.  I'm trying to find the analog for this tracking in 2010 and so far have not been able to do so.  I've found the "Get-MessageTrackingLog - Recipients [email protected]" powershell command, but it's not giving
    me the information I'm looking for.  Any assistance is appreciated. Thanks in advance.

    I've found the tracking, but I can't find out how to get the same info from that tracking that I did in 2003 (I know it's there somewhere, but haven't been able to find the right commands).
    In the 2003 Tracking Center I only need to type the server and a recipient, pick a time frame and it'll show all messages sent to that recipient.  Clicking on one of the results it'll show the message going through the queue, the categorizer, then
    starting the outbound transfer of the  message, ending with something like, "Message transferred to bn1affo11fd014.mail.protection.outlook.com through SMTP."
    In 2010 I have a couple of options in the toolbox.  Initially I figured I'd use the Message Tracking interface, however that only allows you to search from a particular mailbox.  In most cases the messages I'm trying to track are submitted by a
    web application that does not have an Exchange mailbox.
    I then tried using the Tracking Log Explorer, but that's where my understanding breaks down.  I've not been able to figure out what options I need to select to get the equivalent of the information I'd mentioned in the 2003 example above (or the equivalent
    powershell command).

  • Exchange 2010 SP3 DAG Witness/Quorom Server Placement with 3 Datacenters

    Hi we have 2 Exchange 2010 SP3 Server in the same Organization in a DAG
    First one in Datacenter 1 in Germany
    Second one in Datacenter 2 in Austria
    There is a Third Datacenter available in Switzerland
    Where should we place the Witness Server?
    Our major concern is not a WAN Link will go down, most time a Datacenter will loose Power for some hours due
    maintenance work or other things.
    Is it a good idea to place the Witness Server in the third Datacenter!?
    We found a Document which some missconception which talks about placing the witness always in
    the primary Datacenter. But the Datacenter Switchover Document for Exchange 2013 says use a third Datacenter.
    Is that also okay for Exchange 2010 or are they totally different?
    Thank you in advance
    Troga

    Hi,
    It is a new configuration option in Exchange 2013 that we use a third location for hosting the witness server.
    Placing FSW in the third location will privide the ability automatically failover databases to the other datacenter in response to a datacenter-level failure event.
    For more details, you can look at the "Witness server placement considerations" section in the following article.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd298065(v=exchg.150).aspx
    Best regards,
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 email access from iPhone 4

    Hi,
    We have Exchange 2010 in our network and we are publishing OWA & Outlook Anywhere using TMG 2010 with GoDaddy Public Certificate.
    Everything works well.
    I can access the OWA & Outlook Anywhere from Non Domain machines without any issues but when it comes to iPhone it just doesn't work.
    I followed the procedure to configure iPhone from this link and selected the manual configuration option but i get the 
    http://maketecheasier.com/connect-exchange-account-from-iphone/2011/02/14
    I get Server‘
    field added to the previous fields in the settings.
    Is there any configuration required on TMG for iPhone email access?
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Maqsood
    Maqsood Mohammed Senior Systems Engineer MCITP-Enterprise Admin & ITILv3 Foundation Certified

    Hi,
    We have Exchange 2010 in our network and we are publishing OWA & Outlook Anywhere using TMG 2010 with GoDaddy Public Certificate.
    Everything works well.
    I can access the OWA & Outlook Anywhere from Non Domain machines without any issues but when it comes to iPhone it just doesn't work.
    I followed the procedure to configure iPhone from this link and selected the manual configuration option but i get the 
    http://maketecheasier.com/connect-exchange-account-from-iphone/2011/02/14
    I get Server‘
    field added to the previous fields in the settings.
    Is there any configuration required on TMG for iPhone email access?
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Maqsood
    Maqsood Mohammed Senior Systems Engineer MCITP-Enterprise Admin & ITILv3 Foundation Certified
    Please can you give some info about the Godday certificate you bought.

  • Is WMF3 or WMF4 supported in Exchange 2010 SP3 UR5 installed on Server 2008 R2 SP1?

    We'd like to upgrade WMF (aka powershell) on our Exchange 2010 servers but I haven't been able to find any updated information on support with the most recent servicepack/update rollup.
    Is installing WMF3 or WMF4 supported on Server 2008 R2 SP1 w/ Exchange 2010 SP3 UR5?

    WindowsPowerShell 3.0 is supported. Haven't seen 4.0 running for exchange 2010 on 2008 R2
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/heyscriptingguy/archive/2013/11/30/weekend-scripter-wmf-powershell-and-exchange-server-compatibility.aspx
    http://blog.crayon.no/blogs/janegil/archive/2013/11/17/how_2D00_to_2D00_install_2D00_windows_2D00_powershell_2D00_4_2D00_0.aspx
    Cheers,
    Gulab Prasad
    Technology Consultant
    Blog:
    http://www.exchangeranger.com    Twitter:
      LinkedIn:
       Check out CodeTwo’s tools for Exchange admins
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.
    Gulab,
    Where did you read that WMF3 is supported on Exchange 2010 SP3 on Server 2008 R2?
    Neither of the links you pasted suggest that and in fact explicitly say "There has been no testing with ExchangeServer 2010 SP3 and WMF 3.0 installed on Windows Server 2008 R2."
    My Bad, that was TYPO...
    Cheers,
    Gulab Prasad
    Technology Consultant
    Blog:
    http://www.exchangeranger.com    Twitter:
      LinkedIn:
       Check out CodeTwo’s tools for Exchange admins
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Exchange 2010 SP3 upgrade on Windows Server Standard SP2

    I'm midway through the swing upgrade process of migrating from Exchange 2003 - Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013.  Everything has gone smoothly between the Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2010 migration which I started two days ago.  it has been running
    great.  I am beginning the final stages of moving from the Exchange 2010 server to a new Exchange 2013 server, but it requires my Exchange 2010 server to be upgraded to SP3.  I am now trying to install Exchange Server 2013 SP3 Upgrade and I'm
    getting (3) Client Access Role Prerequisites errors.  Finding any of these HotFixes and patches is frustrating, because any link provided does not work.  It has gotten me nowhere.  Here is my Readiness Checks:
    Summary: 6 item(s). 5 succeeded, 1 failed.
    Elapsed time: 00:01:06
    Configuring Prerequisites
    Completed
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:00
    Organization Prerequisites
    Completed
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:08
    Languages Prerequisites
    Completed
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:02
    Hub Transport Role Prerequisites
    Completed
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:15
    Client Access Role Prerequisites
    Failed
    Error:
    Install hotfix Microsoft Knowledge Base article 982867 from http:// code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB982867.
    Click here for help... http:// technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms.exch.err.default(EXCHG.141).aspx?v=14.3.123.3&e=ms.exch.err.Ex28883C&l=0&cl=cp
    Error:
    Install hotfix Microsoft Knowledge Base article 979917 from http:// code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB979917.
    Click here for help... http:// technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms.exch.err.default(EXCHG.141).aspx?v=14.3.123.3&e=ms.exch.err.Ex28883C&l=0&cl=cp
    Error:
    This computer requires the update described in Microsoft Knowledge Base article KB977592 (http:// go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=194843). Without this update, the Outlook Anywhere feature may work unreliably.
    Click here for help... http:// go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=30939&l=en&v=ExBPA.14&id=249bbd89-16b4-4efa-9b66-7ec87f90e44c
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:15
    Mailbox Role Prerequisites
    Completed
    Warning:
    Multi-mailbox search of on-premises and Office 365 mailboxes in a hybrid configuration requires installation of the update mentioned in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 982867 (http:// code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB982867).
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:24
    I put a space between the http://" space "URL so I could display the links.
    Any help/guidance suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    Chris

    I just got these two to go away:
    Error:
    Install hotfix Microsoft Knowledge Base article 982867 from http:// code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB982867.
    Click here for help... http:// technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms.exch.err.default(EXCHG.141).aspx?v=14.3.123.3&e=ms.exch.err.Ex28883C&l=0&cl=cp
    Error:
    This computer requires the update described in Microsoft Knowledge Base article KB977592 (http:// go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=194843). Without this update, the Outlook Anywhere feature may work unreliably.
    Click here for help... http:// go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=30939&l=en&v=ExBPA.14&id=249bbd89-16b4-4efa-9b66-7ec87f90e44c
    still have this one outstanding:
    Error:
    Install hotfix Microsoft Knowledge Base article 979917 from http:// code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB979917.
    Click here for help... http:// technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms.exch.err.default(EXCHG.141).aspx?v=14.3.123.3&e=ms.exch.err.Ex28883C&l=0&cl=cp
    I have tried the FIX: WCF services that are hosted by NLB computers to route messages to Exchange Server fail when WebHeader settings are added by using a .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 application
    Windows6.0-KB2637518-x64.msu
    when I run it, it tells me "The Update does not apply to your system.  So im thinking I need to remove the .NET Framework 4 Client Profile and the .NET Framework 4 Extended.  reboot, then install
    Windows6.0-KB2637518-x64.msu and then reinstall .NET Framework 4 Client Profile and the .NET Framework 4 Extended
    this has taken a day or so to figure out the order of dependencies and the order to put them on.
    Frustrating, since I won't be using Exchange 2010, were moving all the way to Exchange 2013 on a brand new server.
    Chris

  • Exchange 2010 Migration - Decommissioning Multi Role Server and Splitting Roles to 2 new servers - Certificate Query

    Hi,
    I have been tasked with decommissioning our single Multi Role Server (CAS/HT/MB) and assigning the roles to 2 new servers. 1 server will be dedicated to CAS and the other new server will be dedicated to HT & MB roles.
    I think I'm OK with the moving of HT and MB roles from our current server to the new HT/MB server by following "Ed Crowley's Method for Moving Exchange Servers", my focus is on the migration of the CAS role from the current to the new server as
    this one has the potential to kill our mail flow if I don't move the role correctly.
    The actual introduction of the new CAS server is fairly straight forward but the moving of the certificate is where I need some clarification.
    Our current multi role server has a 3rd Party Certificate with the following information:
    Subject: OWA.DOMAIN.COM.AU
    SANs: internalservername.domain.local
              autodiscover.domain.com.au
    The issue here is the SAN entry "internalservername.domain.local" which will need to be removed in order for the certificate to be used on the new CAS server, firstly because the CAS server has a different name and secondly the internal FQDN will
    no longer be allowed to be used from 2015 onwards. So I will need to revoke this certificate and issue a new certificate with our vendor who is Thawte.
    This presents me with an opportunity to simplify our certificate and make changes to the URLs using a new certificate name, so I have proposed the following:
    New Certificate:
    Subject: mail.domain.com.au
    SANs: autodiscover.domain.com.au
              OWA.DOMAIN.COM.AU
    I would then configure the URLs using PowerShell:
    Set-ClientAccessServer -Identity NEWCASNAME-AutodiscoverServiceInternalUrl https://mail.domain.com.au/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
    Set-WebServicesVirtualDirectory -Identity " NEWCASNAME\EWS (Default Web Site)" -InternalUrl https://mail.domain.com.au/ews/exchange.asmx
    Set-OABVirtualDirectory -Identity " NEWCASNAME\oab (Default Web Site)" -InternalUrl https://mail.domain.com.au/oab
    Set-OWAVirtualDirectory -Identity " NEWCASNAME\owa (Default Web Site)" -InternalUrl https://mail.domain.com.au/owa
    I would also then set up split DNS on our internal DNS server creating a new zone called "mail.domain.com.au" and add an host A record with the internal IP address of the new CAS server.
    Now I know I haven't asked a question yet and the only real question I have is to ask if this line of thinking and my theory is correct.
    Have I missed anything or is there anything I should be wary of that has the potential to blow up in my face?
    Thanks guys, I really appreciate any insights and input you have on this.

    Hi Ed,
    Thanks for your reply, it all makes perfect sense I guess I was being optimistic by shutting down the old server and then resubscribing the edge and testing with mailboxes on the new mailbox server.
    I will make sure to move all of the mailboxes over before removing the old server via "Add/Remove Programs". Will I have to move the arbitration mailboxes on the old server across to the new mailbox server? Will having the arbitration mailboxes
    on the old server stop me from completely removing exchange?
    Also, the InternalURL & ExternalURL properties are as follows:
    Autodiscover:
    New CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmxcas01.pharmacare.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
    Old CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmx001.pharmacare.local/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
    WebServices:
    New CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmxcas01.pharmacare.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx
    New CAS - ExternalURL: https://owa.pharmacare.com.au/EWS/Exchange.asmx
    Old CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmx001.pharmacare.local/ews/exchange.asmx
    Old CAS - ExternalURL: https://owa.pharmacare.com.au/EWS/Exchange.asmx
    OAB:
    New CAS - InternalURL: http://svwwmxcas01.pharmacare.local/OAB
    New CAS - ExternalURL: https://owa.pharmacare.com.au/OAB
    Old CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmx001.pharmacare.local/oab
    Old CAS - ExternalURL: https://owa.pharmacare.com.au/OAB
    OWA:
    New CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmxcas01.pharmacare.local/owa
    New CAS - ExternalURL: https://owa.pharmacare.com.au/
    Old CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmx001.pharmacare.local/owa
    Old CAS - ExternalURL: https://owa.pharmacare.com.au/
    ECP:
    New CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmxcas01.pharmacare.local/ecp
    New CAS - ExternalURL: https://owa.pharmacare.com.au/ecp
    Old CAS - InternalURL: https://svwwmx001.pharmacare.local/ecp
    Old CAS - ExternalURL: https://owa.pharmacare.com.au/ecp
    Our Public Certificate has the following details:
    Name: OWA.PHARMACARE.COM.AU
    SAN/s: autodiscover.pharmacare.com.au, svwwmx001.pharmacare.local
    From your previous communications you mentioned that this certificate would not need to change, it could be exported from the old server and imported to the new which I have done. With the InternalURL & ExternalURL information that you see here can you
    please confirm that your original recommendation of keeping our public certificate and importing it into the new CAS is correct? Will we forever get the certificate warning on all of our Outlook clients when we cut over from the old to the new until we get
    a new certificate with the SAN of "svwwmx001.pharmacare.local" removed?
    Also, I am toying with the idea of implementing a CAS Array as I thought that implementing the CAS Array would resolve some of the issues I was having on Saturday. I have followed the steps from this website, http://exchangeserverpro.com/how-to-install-an-exchange-server-2010-client-access-server-array/,
    and I have got all the way to the step of creating the CAS array in the Exchange Powershell but I have not completed this step for fear of breaking connectivity to all of my Outlook Clients. By following all of the preceeding steps I have created a Windows
    NLB with dedicated NICs on both the old CAS and the new CAS servers (with separate IP addresses on each NIC and a new internal IP address for the dedicated CAS array) and given it the name of "casarray.pharmacare.local" as per the instructions on
    the website, the questions I have on adding the CAS array are:
    1. Do you recommend adding the CAS array using this configuration?
    2. Will this break Outlook connectivity alltogether?
    3. Will I have to generate a new Public Certificate with an external FQDN of "casarray.pharmacare.com.au" pointing back to a public IP or is it not required?
    4. If this configuration is correct, and I add the CAS Array as configured, when the time comes to remove the old server is it just as simple as removing the NLB member in the array and everything works smoothly?
    So, with all of the information at hand my steps for complete and successful migration would be as follows:
    1. Move all mailboxes from old server to new server;
    2. Move arbitration mailboxes if required;
    3. Implement CAS Array and ensure that all Outlook clients connect successfully;
    4. Remove old server;
    5. Shut down old server;
    6. Re-subscribe Edge from new Hub Transport server;
    7. Test internal & external comms;
    We also have internal DNS entries that would need changing:
    1. We have split DNS with a FLZ of "owa.pharmacare.com.au" that has a Host A record going to the old server, this would need changing from "svwwmx001.pharmacare.local" to "svwwmxcas01.pharmacare.local";
    2. The _autodiscover entry that sits under _TCP currently has the IP address of the old server, this would need to be changed to the IP address of the new CAS;
    3. The CNAME that sits in our FLZ for "pharmacare.local" would need to be changed from "svwwmx001.pharmacare.local" to "svwwmxcas01.pharmacare.local".
    4. Or rather than using the FQDN of the server where applicable in the DNS changes would I be using the FQDN of the CAS Array instead? Please confirm.
    Would you agree that the migration path and DNS change plan is correct?
    Sorry for the long post, I just need to make sure that everything goes right and I don't have egg on my face. I appreciate your help and input.
    Thanks again.
    Regards,
    Jamie

  • Proper way to install windows update on Exchange 2010 DAG with one mailbox server in Head Office and 1 mailbox server in DR site both are members of 1 DAG

    Hi Guyz,
    I have this setup in my exchange environment.
    1 DAG with 2 members
    - One member is located in Head Office and the other member is located in DR site. All of the mailbox databases are located only in HO (Plan to add additional second member in HO soon). Now what is the proper way to install windows patches on the
    member in HO? I don't want to move the databases to DR site as much as possible.
    Appreciate your feedback and Many thanks in advance guyz..
    More power to all!
    Regards,

    Hi,
    To update the DAG members with new patches, the update process should be managed to prevent all of the DAG members from being offline at the same time.
    To do this, I recommend you move the active mailbox databases off a particular server so that it can be patched, and if necessary rebooted, without causing any downtime for mailbox users on that database.
    For detailed steps, here is an article for your reference.
    How to Install Updates on Exchange Server 2010 Database Availability Groups
    http://exchangeserverpro.com/how-to-install-updates-on-exchange-server-2010-database-availability-groups/
    Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The site is not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make
    sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
    Hope it helps.
    Best regards,
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Secure Exchange 2010 email

    Hi
    Does anyone have any advice on the best way to secure Exchange emails? Can they be encrypted?
    Thanks
    Shane 

    Hi,
    To be able to encrypt messages sent to external users, I would like to consider
    S/MIME encryption or 3<sup>rd</sup> part solution.
    S/MIME is a widely accepted method for sending digitally signed and encrypted messages. S/MIME allows you to encrypt emails and digitally sign them. When you use S/MIME with an email message, it helps the people who receive that message to
    be certain that what they see in their inbox is the exact message that started with the sender. It will also help people who receive messages to be certain that the message came from the specific sender and not from someone pretending to be the sender.
    Plan for e-mail messaging cryptography in Outlook 2010
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc179061.aspx
    Secure Mail
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc962043.aspx
    Hope this will be helpful for you.
    Best Regards.

  • Exchange 2010 - Email signature setup with Transport Rule - Want to disable the rule for iOS devices

    So we decided to have a company wide email signature which pulls user info from AD to fill in the HTML template. What I have found out is that iOS devices send email as plain text which displays the HTML content with strings of text in emails send from
    those devices. The only way I have found to make this work is have the user keep the default "Send from my iPhone" signature and exclude the rule based on that text in the body. Is there a cleaner option in case our users decide to change their default
    signature on their iOS devices?

    I can't find a clean answer for you.
    You might use the Set-TransportRule cmdlet and one of the exception clauses to look for something in the header.  I looked at an ActiveSync-generated header from my Droid (I don't have an iPhone to try this out on) and I see this:
    Message-ID: [email protected]
    The clause:
    -ExceptIfHeaderMatchesPatterns "Message-ID:\s(\S|\s)*email.android.com"
    should exclude messages sent from Droids.  Of course, I can't say that it'll exclude all of them so you'll have to experiment and use trial and error.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123534(v=exchg.150).aspx
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997187(v=exchg.141).aspx
    You may need to experiment with the rule because I haven't tested it.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Exchange 2010 Email Alias

    Is there a way (preferably with Powershell) to find out when the last time an email was sent to a persons email alias as opposed to the primary email address?
    Any help would be appreciated.

    Hi,
    Based on my knowledge, when we use Get-MessageTrackingLog cmdlet to find out when the last time an email was sent to a user, we usually use
    Recpients parameter specifies the recipient's SMTP e-mail addresses of the messages. And there are
    no other parameters we can specify the recipient's alias instead of primary email address.
    In addition, here is the script to find out when the last time an email was sent to a user with email SMTP address.
    $UserList = Get-mailbox -Resultsize 10
    $MasterList = @()
    foreach ($User in $UserList) {
    $MyObject = New-Object PSObject -Property @{
    EmailAddress = $null
    MailboxSize = $null
    LastSent = $null
    $ErrorActionPreference = 'SilentlyContinue'
    $MyObject.LastSent = ((Get-TransportServer | Get-MessageTrackingLog -Recipients $user.PrimarySmtpAddress | sort timestamp)[-1]).timestamp
    $MyObject.EmailAddress = ($User).PrimarySmtpAddress
    $MyObject.MailboxSize = (Get-MailboxStatistics $User).TotalItemSize
    $ErrorActionPreference = 'Continue'
    $MasterList += $MyObject
    $MasterList
    Note: Searching message tracking logs across the organization is very slow.  I specified "resultsize 10" below so you can see how the script works.  Once you're happy, change "10" to "unlimited".
    Best regards.

  • Unable to receive some emails in Exchange 2010

    Hi,
    Spent a few days on this and getting no where fast and out of ideas now.
    We migrated a customer from SBS2003 running exchange 2003 to Server 2012 running HyperV with Exchange 2010 on a VM. So far the migration had gone through without many issues. We have 2 VM one AD/File server other Exchange 2010. with the old SBS2003 server
    still online.
    Basically after moving all the mailboxes from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010, some random users wont receive mail. Internal and sending is perfect. Port 25 was changed from the old SBS server and pointing to new EX2010 box.
    After more testing pointing port 25 back to the old server solves the problem, all users receives emails instantly. So emails are routed via the old SBS box to the new Exchange.
    On the new server both Send and receive connectors have been deleted and recreated. Checked the Default connector and Anonymous users has been ticked. Also this is ticked on the newly created receive connector.
    I enabled SMTP logging and noticed the emails the wasn't getting delivered had the message below.
    354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>,
    ,Remote
     Found another person with something similar and tried the fix didn't work for me
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/da8a1fa4-0757-4ea5-8225-de15707d5a57/problems-receiving-mail-smtpreceive-is-set-to-verbose
    Spoke with the ISP, all the email for our customer goes through a SPAM filtering service and they noticed their server would Telnet in and get "connection lost" after the Mail from: command, which matches the error on the SMTP log. Again it happens
    to random users not receiving mail, but I did notice any new users that was created after the migration doesn't get any external emails when router via the ISP and Port 25 pointing to the new server. 
    So as a trial I bypassed the ISP by updating the MX record to point mail directly at new server, this fixed the problem! Everyone new and old users was receiving no problems. But speaking with the ISP they have 100+ customers on Exchange 2010 and never
    experienced this issue. Only difference i can see we are using HyperV, could this be a networking issue?
    PS our ISP uses a Watchguard device for Spam filtering.
    Thanks!!!

    X.400 potentially could be the problem.. got through this article
    http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management-administration/x400-addresses-exchange-2010-part1.html
    Where Technology Meets Talent

Maybe you are looking for