Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 13100100 currency INR

We are facing issues with doing BRS and getting the following message,
Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 13100100 currency INR
We have tried all possible steps mentioned on SCN,please note the acoount mentioned above does not have the open item management.
Assigned GL accounts on transaction DSA-Difference arising on G/L acct clearing.

Hi ,
THis question has been Asked and answered lot of time .
Can you Please go to OB09 and define your GL account to solve this problem
Many Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 16138579 currency INR

    The following message is coming,while trying to clear vendor account of capital services.Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 16138579 currency INR
    Please help us to resolve the issue.

    Hello Kishore,
    Use TCode: OB09 and maintain FX determination account for G/L account 16138579. In case you have local currency 2 then you will also need to maintain FX determination see below example:
    Additional setting in case you have local currency 2

  • Exchange rate diff. accts are not defined for account 16145110currency INR

    Dear SAP Gurrus,
    I am facing a problem while making  payment against invoice, receiving payment against invoice, clearing advance payment and  advance receipts through T-code F-53, F-28, F-44 and F-32.  System is allowing me to select the invoices against which I want to do the clearing but when I go for simulation I am getting the following error -
    ' Exchange rate diff. accts are not defined for account 16145110currency INR'.
    When I click on the error message the performance assistant gives methe following details:
    Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 16145110 currency INR
    Message no. F5062
    Diagnosis
    The accounts for posting the exchange rate differences could not be determined. For the specified G/L account and the specified currency key, no corresponding exchange rate difference accounts were determined.
    System Response
    The system cannot generate the exchange rate difference posting.
    Procedure
    By pressing ENTER, you achieve that the document is reset to a status without automatic posting. In another window, you can complete the default settings for exchange rate differences and post the document afterwards.
    Proceed
    My client is local. Even the local currency is set to 'INR'. There is no foreign currency involced while making invoices, payment and receitps.  Eventhough the system is giving me error.  As a result I am not able to clear open items. Please give me some feasible solution so that I can clear the open items.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Shreyas Wani

    hi,
    As you said, you are not maintaining any Exchange rate differences, It may not be required a Exch rate Diffrences account.
    Please check whether you have created any Group / Parrallel curencies etc in co.code level.
    Please go through the notes 209580 / 89531, hope it helps you.
    Regards
    Kanna

  • Ex.rate diff.accts are incomplete for account 0011576702 currency IDR.

    Hi,
    I am making bank reconciliation and I am getting problem for exchange rate diff. though GL 0011576702  is maintained in OBA1   in 220.
    Ex.rate diff.accts are incomplete for account 0011576702 currency IDR.
    Though my invoice is in currency IDR and I am making payment also in IDR.
    Pls suggest where I should maintain GL for ex rate diff. in OBA1 and why as GL 0011576702   is my outgoing payment GL.
    Thanks,
    Taral Patel

    Dear:
                  In T.Code OBA1 and transaction KDF, configure it there. Check the GL in FS00 for balances in local currency tick only. If it is ticked the system will not be able to post the exchange rate difference despite it is maintained in OBA1
                  Regards

  • "Acct determination not defined for trans. ZDI"

    Hello everyone,
    I made a payments to vendor and customer invoices with payment differences. What i mean is, i had an invoice for $1000 and i made a payment of $995 only. That difference should go to permitted payment difference.. when i was trying to post it ,am getting an error msg "Acct determination not defined for trans. ZDI   in chart of accts DPSD"  DPSD is my chart of account. I created the tolerance group for $50 and 5%.Iam unable to post the partial and residual payments also. What are the steps need to follow? Where  i did a mistake?
    It would be very helpful if anyone helps me to reslove this issue..
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sweety.

    Hi Christian,
    Thank you for your quick responce.. When i entered the table to30 and given the chart of account to see all the accounts that are linked to the trancsaction key ZDI in SE16n. Getting an error msg " Table TO30 is not active in the Dictionary Message no. MO402 "  am still in confustion.. Could you please help me in doing partial and residual payments also if you can. because it is not accepting to post the amount. What i mean is i posted and invoice for $1000 and paid a partial payement for $500 in f-53. Do know where i did a mistake in making partial and residual payements..
    Thank you for  your support.
    Regards.

  • Payment order are not defined for extended withholding  tax

    Hi Gurus,
    Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
    Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
    In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
    Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
    I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
    any help is welcome

    The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
    For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
    methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
    no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
    The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
    however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
    Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
    FBZP.
    Best regards,
    Leonardo Vedovelli
    FI Support Engineer
    SAP Active Global Support

  • Depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code

    Dear Expert,
    Would like to seek for help, when I run a customize report (AUC without PO not yet capitalized report the system prompt the error depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code only on the march 2011 on ward but before march 2011 the report is able to display as usual.
    Between., does SAP have the standard report to list the asset which is AUC and not yet capitalized?
    My version of SAP is ECC 6.0.
    Kindly advise.
    Regards,
    Karen

    Hi,
    Thank you for the prompt reply, why the system prompt the error depreciation posting rules are not define for area 00 in company code only on the march 2011 on ward but before march 2011 the report is able to display as usual?
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Karen

  • Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders

    Hi All,
             when i convert the planned order to production order  i got this massage popup coming  Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders . please let me know this .

    Hi,
    One of major customization steps for the order type is missing. Run OPU3 and maintain settings for the order type you are using. You may copy settings from an older type.
    Regards.

  • Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    Would you please help me with the message below:
    Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
    In my company  payment orders are created in F110  for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
    Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
    I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
    any help is welcome !
    TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding  tax

    Hi,
    On the analysis,  the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
    code as XX.
    The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
    witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
    with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
    BSEG-QSSKZ  with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
    store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
    tax.
    As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
    the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
    company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
    database information.
    Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
    need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
    i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
    This should resolve your issue.
    Kind Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Payer 1234 is not defined for account 9999 3333

    Hi All
    When trying to block the Customer Sales Invoice in FB02 with Payment Block 'A' getting the error as 'Payer 1234 is not defined for account 99999 3333'.
    Our scenario is like this:
    1. Sale Order is raised against Customer 9999 in company code 3333.  Customer 1234 is bill to party in this sale order.  All other partners (Sold to Party, Ship to Party, Payer ) are 9999 only.
    2. Invoice is created and released to Billing.
    3. Now when we are trying to block the Invoice getting the error message mentioned above.
    I have checked the sales are partner functions for 1234 and 9999 in the master records.  for 1234 all partner functions are 1234 and for 9999, 9999 only.
    So, when I have not maintained 1234 as payer anywhere, why is it expecting to maintian alternatifve payer..
    I have replicated the same in our pre production but works fine there without any error messages.
    Can you pls advise where It's going wrong.
    Regards
    Rayala

    Hi Friends,
    I have further investigated and found that there is a substituion where in Bill to Party act as a Payer.  So system expecting Bill to party to be maintained as payer.
    Thanks all
    Rayala

  • Depreciation posting rules are not defined for area 00 in Company Code.

    Dear expert,
    Would like to seek for advice why the SAP report  trigger this error and what could be cause this error is promt out.
    Please advice.
    Many thanks
    KH

    Dear:
              This error appears when system does not find the rules that how to post deprecation. Please check whether you have defined dep posting rules in OAYR for your depreciation area in co code . It determines that how your depreciation will be calculated , monthly , by monthly , yearly e.t.c. Hope it will resolve your query.
    Regards

  • Account determination not defined for trans.ZDI in chart of account INT

    Hi, Experts,
    I have the following erroe message when trying to make clearing by using transaction f-28.
    After selecting the reason I got the message: "Acct determination not defined for trans. ZDI in chart of accts XXX", but I already define the GL accounts in OBXL for each difference.
    What is still missing?
    Thank you in advance.
    Best regards,
    Fan

    Hi,
    Check if the same are maintained for the Chart of accounts that the system is prompting for.
    If these are maintained, check the parameters for which these are maintined like-
    - Debit/Credit
    - Reason Code
    - Tax Code
    One of these is missing.
    Caio
    Raghu

  • Goods Issue error - batches not defined for delivery item

    Hi,
    We are getting a Goods Issue error  u201CThe batches are not defined for delivery item 000010u201D.   We are only getting this error for a material that is being shipped against a particular third party sales scheduling agreement.  We went live in 2007 and we had no issues, but when we had to create a new Sched Agreement this year, for third party sales, we started to get this error.  However, if we re-activate the old scheduling agreement we do not get the error.  We have a batch job that executes the following steps:
    1.     VL06IG (collective goods receipt)
    2.     VL10 (collective delivery)
    3.     VL06O (collective GI)
    We have compared the 2 scheduling agreements and see no difference.  We are assuming it has something to do with how the scheduling agreement was setup, but are not sure.  Any suggestions on how to correct this problem would be much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Helen

    Dear Murali,
    The material has not changed at all.  I'm not sure what you mean by maintaining batches while receipt of the material.
    If I re-open the old scheduling agreement, we do not get the error message.  However, as soon as we use the new SD scheduling agreement, we get the error.  We are using the same material master on both scheduling agreements.
    Thanks,
    Helen

  • Sales area not defined

    Hello frnds,
                       I am trying to create a customer in XD01 but it gives me an error stating "SAles area not defined for customer.......I have maintained SAles area properly in IMG  but cant figur eout the reason for this error.
    Please assist
    Regards
    maddy

    Hi
    Go and check at SPRO -- SD -- Master Data -- assign common dist channel and Division...
    you will have assigned some dist channel and division opposite to your distr channel and division...
    Change the same to your own....
    Example
    You have to do like this for both dist channel and division
    S.org          dist channel        ref for master data         ref for condition
    1000                    10                         10                               10
    Muthupandiyan

  • Exchange rate type not defined for country

    Hi All,
    I have noticed an error message during testing of postings using tax codes. The error message nbr is FF802 (Exchange rate type is not defined for country XX). When we are testing postings on accounts for which tax code is ignored (not relevant) it is ok. Could you please let me know where exactly we have settings and how it is related to the tax codes ? I have never seen that connection previously.
    Thanks,
    Points will be rewarded afterwards.
    Tomasz

    Hi Tomasz,
    The exchange rate types are defined at country level in General Settings and the company codes with that country can access that. Normally the exchange rate types are defined as M, P, B and G. M is for average rate and is used in FI,  while P is for planning in CO.
    Regd
    Bharat

Maybe you are looking for

  • Model wise profitability report

    Hi, As per our new client business requirement(Bus manufacturing company) we can define division specific sales organization. Here product groups are treated as division.  We have models of finished goods (Vehicle). In vehicle finished goods there ar

  • IPad2 not respond to touchscreen even after being reset

    I bought my iPad2 a couple of months ago and it has been working fine until one day the touchscreen started to not respond to my touch. The external buttons are all working fine, but I can't get it to unlock or do anything without it not responding.

  • Mounting saved pkg's during install [solved]

    I have copied my saved pkg cache "/var/cache/pacman/pkg/" to an extra partition. With the idea of not having to re-download them for a new install. (about 1.3 gigs) During the install I mount it to /src/arch/pkg  But when I continue, it can't find /s

  • SAP automaticly calculats the credit for samples in Financial Acct mod?

    Expert - How do i ensure that when the Materials Product Manager enters production data (includes pills packaged as samples) into the Material Management module of SAP, the system automatically calculates the credit for samples in the Financial Accou

  • Concurrent modification jdo exception

    Hi, When multiple ejb instances/threads are accessing the same persistence object I get this exception: javax.jdo.JDOUserException: An instance was concurrently modified in another transaction (optimistic lock #: 238). FailedObject:dk.pine.mediamanag