EXCHANGE SUBPARTITION between two Partitioned tables

DB Version: 10.2.0.5
We have :
Table A(Range-List Partitioned):
Partition A1 -> Sub-Partition S1A1 and S2A1
Partition A2 -> Sub-Partition S1A2 and S2A2
Table B(Range-List Partitioned):
Partition B1 -> Sub-Partition S1B1 and S2B1
Partition B2 -> Sub-Partition S1B2 and S2B2
I would like to EXCHANGE SUBPARITION A.S1A1 with B.S1B1, and S2A1 with S2B1 and S1A2 with S1B2 ...so on. Which means, how do I exchange subpartitions between two similar tables?
The following statement does not work...
ALTER TABLE A EXCHANGE SUBPARTITION S1A1
WITH TABLE B SUBPARTITION S1B1 INCLUDING INDEXES;
Please advice.

Hi,
ALTER TABLE A EXCHANGE SUBPARTITION S1A1 WITH TABLE B INCLUDING INDEXES;
Read the document
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/itss/docs/oracle/10g/server.101/b10739/partiti.htm
Regards
Hitgon

Similar Messages

Performance between two partitionned tables with different structure

Hi,
I would like if there is a difference between two partitionned tables with different structure in term of performance (access, query, insertions, updates ).
I explain myself in detail :
I have a table that stores one value every 10 minutes in a day (so we have 144 values (24*6) in the whole day), with the corresponding id.
Here is the structure :
| Table T1 |
+ id PK |
+ date PK |
+ sample1 |
+ sample2 |
+ ... |
+ sample144 |
The table is partionned on the column date, with a partionned every months. The primary key is based on the columns (id, date).
There is an additionnal index on the column (id) (is it useful ?).
I would like to know if it is better to have a table with just (id, date, value) , so for one row in the first table we'll have 144 rows in the future? table. The partition will already be on the columns (id, date) with the index associated.
What are the gains or loss in performance with this new structure ( access, DMLs , storage ) ?
I discuss with the Java developers and they say it is simpler to manage in their code.
Oracle version : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
Thanks & Regards
From France
Oliver
Edited by: 998239 on 5 avr. 2013 01:59

I mean storage in tablespaces and datafiles on disk.
Can you justify please and give me concrete arguments why the two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value))
because i have to make a report.i didnt say any thing like
two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value)i said
About structure : TABLE1(id, date, value) is better than TABLE1(id, date, sample1, .... sample144)because
1) oracle has restriction for numbers of column. Ok you can have 144 columns now but for future if you must have more than 1000 columns , what will you do?
2) Restrictions on Table Compression (Table compression is not supported for tables with more than 255 columns.)
3) store same type values on diffrent columns is bad practise
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
i remember i seen Toms article about this but now i cant find it sorry ((( if i found i will post here

Error while running code template mapping between two oracle tables

Hello All
Iam getting the following error while running code template mapping between two oracle tables. Using OWB 11gR2 and oracle 11gR2 DB.
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-20001: The active workspace is not valid as a target for this mapping
c: at "OWBSYS.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT_UTIL", line 1065
ORA-06512: at "OWBSYS.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT_UTIL", line 1087
ORA-06512: at "SOURCE.FILENET_EX_UNIT_3", line 555
ORA-06512: at line 4
Job 51 error: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-20001: The active workspace is not valid as a target for this mapping
ORA-06512: at "OWBSYS.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT_UTIL", line 1065
ORA-06512: at "OWBSYS.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT_UTIL", line 1087
ORA-06512: at "SOURCE.FILENET_EX_UNIT_3", line 555
ORA-06512: at line 4
Quick help is highly appreciated.

Dera Dallan
its only a target user for the workspace where you are deploying the mapping from.
I have two repositories for two different projects. each repositary has its own workspace.
ex:-
Project 1
Work space bpms_rep_owner
Repositary owner bpms_rep_owner
Repositary user bpms_rep_user
Project 2
Work space dem_rep_owner
Repositary owner dem_rep_owner
Repositary user dem_rep_user
Reg
S.Gyazuddin

Bridge Table between two fact tables

Hello everybody,
From what I have read on the BI Administration tool help and on this forum, bridge tables are used to define many-to-many relations between dimension sand fact tables. Is it possible to have a bridge table defining a many-to-many relation between two fact tables?
Here is my senario:
1. We have a fact table called fact_Orders describing orders for some products.
2. We have a fact table called fact_Sales describing sales og these products.
3. We have a table describing the transformation from order lines to sales lines which is a many-to-many relation, because it is possible to transform an order in more than two steps.
I was thinking of connecting the two fact tables with a bridge table.
If bridge tables are inappropriate for this case, what could be a better model for my senario?
Thanks for your time.

Hi,
Well a conformed dimension is a bridge table between two facts, so not sure why you need anything else. If there is a one to many from D1 to F1 and a one to many from D1 to F2 then effectively there is a many to many join from F1 to F2 through the D1 dimension.
Sounds to me like all you need is an order dimension table, rows in the orders fact table will join to this dimension and so will rows in the sales fact table. You can then do calculations like number of sales per order, total sales revenue per order, # of order items per order etc etc.
Regards,
Matt

Find the difference between two internal table

how can i see the difference between two interal tables?
The requirement is as follows
1. We have a transparent table, which stores the employee data with EMP ID as key.
2. We load the transp table data into a interal table (B).
3. We get data from legecy system as file and it gets loaded into another internal table (A) (this also has the same EMP ID key and this will have latest addition/update to those emplyees).
Now we need to seperate out these data into three interal table Inserted (I), Deleted (D) and Updated (U).
We want to do followign things
I = A - B
D = B - A
Both A and B will have around 40k records. Hence we are trying to avoid the looping.
Please suggest the best option for us.
Thank you in advance.
Raghavendra

>
RAGHAV URAL wrote:
> how can i see the difference between two interal tables?
> The requirement is as follows
>
> 1. We have a transparent table, which stores the employee data with EMP ID as key.
> 2. We load the transp table data into a interal table (B).
> 3. We get data from legecy system as file and it gets loaded into another internal table (A) (this also has the same EMP ID key and this will have latest addition/update to those emplyees).
>
> Now we need to seperate out these data into three interal table Inserted (I), Deleted (D) and Updated (U).
>
> We want to do followign things
> I = A - B
> D = B - A
>
> Both A and B will have around 40k records. Hence we are trying to avoid the looping.
>
> Please suggest the best option for us.
>
> Thank you in advance.
> Raghavendra
Hi Raghavendra,
Currently as of my knowledge, these operations are only possible through LOOPs. But LOOPign can be really fast here if you properly utilize the SORTING, READ with BINARY SEARCH and FIELD-SYMBOLS usage. I would say:-
Steps for Insert:-
SORT: A, B.
LOOP AT A ASSIGNING <WA_A>.
READ TABLE B WITH TABLE KEY key = <WA_A>-key BINARY SEARCH.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
APPEND <WA_A> TO I.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Steps for Delete:-
SORT: A, B.
LOOP AT B ASSIGNING <WA_B>.
READ TABLE A WITH TABLE KEY key = <WA_B>-key BINARY SEARCH.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
APPEND <WA_B> TO D.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Regards,
Ravi.

Need to eliminate Space between two Pivot table view in OBIEE 11g

Hi,
I have a requirement to eliminate space between two pivot table views. In a single report I have two Pivot table with two different column, I placed both of them one after another, but I need to eliminate the space between two pivot table views as if it should show as a single pivot table in OBIEE 11g.
Could anyone please let me know how I can do this in OBIEE 11g?
Thanks in Advance
Anirban Mitra

If I create narrative view it will be another view. And if I put that in between that two pivot view, it will show the space. I need to remove space between two pivot table within a single report so that it can appear as a single pivot view.
Thanks

Intervals, synchronize the data between two oracle tables located in diffe

Hi Experts,
Is there any way I can, at set intervals, synchronize the data between two oracle tables located in different servers? What is the software, if there is any? If there are steps I can follow, so much the better.
Thanks!

I'm not sure what you want to achieve here...
I want to synchronize both the Servers , so that it can update HO servers as well as Factory Server with the complete data. Could you please elaborate a little bit more; basing on your description I could also tell you how to setup timesync for those two servers if I understand "complete data" as the current date and time...
Also a lot of solutions are platform and version specific so it would help if you could indicate OS and Database Versions (4 digit).
And I still fail to see what this has to do with forms. You might want to post your question to the Database General forum: General Database Discussions
cheers

How to share/exchange songs between two iPods?

Hi,
I would like to know of a way(s) to share/exchange songs between two iPods (synced to two separate computers).
Thanks,
Apu

Apu,
It's possible to share between two computers but not two iPods, change the settings for the pod to manual > Edit > Preferences > iPod.

How exchange messages between two user-bean instances?

Hi,
I would like to let several user to log-in my web site (I'm using tomcat) and then let them exchange some messages until they are logged-in. Is there a way using JSF?
I was thinking about implementing a list of messages inside each user-bean. The user should know that other users are logged-in, that could be listed in a table, and click on its name. I would like that the click action create an item in the list valiable of the selected user. Is that possible using JSF? I didn't find any of such kind of communication between two user-bean instances.
Do you have any hints? Is that the right way or is there other possibilities?
Thanks

You could get hold of a map of sessions in the application scope. Make use of HttpSessionListener to add/remove sessions to/from the map.
JSF is just another component based MVC framework on top of JSP/Servlet. Everything which you can do in JSP/Servlet is just still possible. You only need to understand how JSF works under the hood.

Is there a way to share my Mail account and settings between two partitions, running Snow Leopard and Lion?

I have two partitions on my internal hard drive - one is running Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard and the other is running Mac OS X 10.7 Lion. Mail (5.0) is set up and runs perfectly on the Lion partition and I have not used Mail (4.5) yet on my Snow Leopard partition. I want to know if I can read, download, and save mail into the same user Library folder (probably the Lion user library) from both partitions...

You usually set up your mail accounts on a specific e-mail client programs such as Mail in OS X and Mail on an iPad, which will access the same remote mail server to have your messages show up on each device. Mailboxes can be synced in this way between two devices.
An alternative is to use the same remote application such as Gmail to access that service from multiple devices, so a dedicated e-mail client like Mail is not needed, but the availability of these depends on the e-mail service being used.

Connection between two fact tables.

I have a problem in OBIEE 10.1.3.2:
I have two fact tables A and B. Both tables have three columns - time_id, position_id and valuea (table A), time_id, position_id and valueb (table B). I have dimensions TIME (id, time) and POSITION (id, post). Facts A and B are connected to dimensions and
both queries
select TIME.time, POSITION.post, A.valuea,
select TIME.time, POSITION.post, B.valueb
work properly.
But it is definitely impossible to execute query
select TIME.time, POSITION.post, A.valueA, B.valueB.
[NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table A) does not contain mapping for [B.VALUEB]. (HY000)
Another two fact tables in the same application I can join in any query wihout any problem.
How is it possible?
Thanks for your help
Jiri

How did you joined two Fact tables. Did you use Dimension table between?

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO INTERNAL TABLES,THESE TABLES HAVE SAME FILEDS

TYPES: BEGIN OF
TY_AS_UP,
WERKS LIKE
                  MARC-WERKS,
MATNR LIKE
                   MARC-MATNR,
LGORT LIKE
                  MARD-LGORT,
LABST(13) TYPE C,
(MARD-LABST)
END OF TY_AS_UP.
TABLES:
1) FLAT FILE DATA.:
DATA: WA_FILEDATA
             TYPE TY_AS_UP,
I_FILEDATA TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_AS_UP INITIAL SIZE 0.
2) SAP DATA (SELECT QUREY)
DATA: WA_SAPDATA
              TYPE TY_AS_UP,
I_SAPDATA TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_AS_UP INITIAL SIZE 0.
NOTE:
I brought data to above table(2) from two internal tables I_MARC and I_MARD .
My requirement is to display difference between tables 1) and 2) based on quantity field(MARD-LABST)..
report layout:
      top-of-page
plant diff qty distri.qty   sap
01       -20       30        50
        end-of-page
          page no 1.
Kindly help me,it is urgent

hi micky,
     thanks for your solution.
another problem:
I could not understand below
requirement, could you please
explain me.
8)     Format the report based on the display options specified in the selection screen.
a)     Display option EQUAL IN QTY show report lines where the difference is between the distributor file quantity and the SAP quantity is 0.
b)     Display option DIFFERENCE IN QTY show report lines where the difference between the distributor file quantity and the SAP quantity is not 0.
c)     If both options are selected, show report lines where the difference is both 0 and not 0.
d)     Display SKUs in the distributors file not found in SAP as Missing SKUs
regards,
saritha.

Inner Join between two big tables

Hi There,
I have a situation where in which I have to write an inner join between two table of the order of (30k to 60 rows).
My query is as simple as,
select A.a,B.b from A ,B where A.a = B.b;
N.B: a and b are of type varchar
But the problem is it takes nearly 15 mins to run. Is there any better way of doing an inner join between such bigger tables?
Thanks,
Jose John.

Thank you all for your help.....Indexing works....:)
--JJ

Globale variable to exchange value between two planning function (Formel)

Hi,
can I define a globale variable to exchange the value between two planning function?
any anwser will be very appreciated.
hongwei

Hi,
can I define a globale variable to exchange the value between two planning function?
any anwser will be very appreciated.
hongwei

Compare multiple variable selections between two internal tables

I am trying to work out the syntax for the following, however i am stumped on the 2nd part of the requirement....
I have two internal tables. and i need to compare the records.
1st, line by line, which i can do, however the 2nd requirement, i need to check a range of data against the same table...
here is an example of the tables:
Internal Table1 has the following records.
TL1
TL2
TL3
TL4
TL5
TL6
Internal table 2 has the following records...
LDOC1     TL1
LDOC1     TL2
LDOC1     TL3
LDOC1     TL7
LDOC2     TL1
LDOC2     TL5
LDOC3     TL6
LDOC3     TL7
but for the 2nd requirement, i have to group the LDOC1 (2, 3) and search for all TL* and report if they all exist, some exist or none exist within the 1st internal table.
so for requirement 1, the answer would be yes (as i can do a read table using the TL*), however i am not sure how i can check "for all entries" for TL1, Tl2, TL3, TL7 and return that only some entries exist.... LDOC1 should return "some", LDOC2 should return "all" and LDOC3 should return "none".
Hopefully that makes sense???
Can someone give me a keyword to investigate as i am not sure the At new would work.... Unless i do an at new and then loop and maybe add the record to a "range" to then compare and log the result as it runs through each result...
so if Itab1 = itab2 then variable = yes. else None.
if variable = yes, and itab1 = itab2 then variable = yes.
if variable = yes and itab1 <> itab2 then variable = some.
would that work?? i am worried about performance too as there could be 1000's of records....
and can i have an "at end" so at end, if variable = yes, then variable = all?
i have written all the rest of the report to get all the data into these tables... i am just a little baffled as to how i can validate and compare the multiple selection.... :o(

Hi,
It is really confusing :-).. But i have tried to figure out.. may be this could be useful for you.
Internal Table1 has the following records.
TL1
TL2
TL3
TL4
TL5
Internal table 2 has the following records...
LDOC1 TL1
LDOC1 TL2
LDOC1 TL3
LDOC1 TL7
LDOC2 TL1
LDOC2 TL5
LDOC3 TL6
LDOC3 TL7
itab3[] = itab2[]
sort itab3 by field1.
delete adjacent duplicates from itab3 comparing field1.
itab3
LDCO1
LDCO2
LDCO3
loop at itab3.
clear: lv_flag, index, ind.
loop at itab2 where field1 = itab3-field1.
index = index + 1.
read table itab1 with key field1 = itab2-field2.
if sy-subrc NE 0.
lv_flag = 'X'.
ind = ind + 1.
endif.
endloop.
if lv_flag = 'X'.
if ind = index.
lv_val = 'NONE'.
elseif ind NE index.
lv_val = 'SOME'.
endif.
else.
lv_val = 'ALL'.
endif.
"here you can modify itab3 with lv_val in one field, so that you can figure out which is SOME, NONE, ALL
endloop.
Regards,
senthil

EXCHANGE SUBPARTITION between two Partitioned tables

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for