Excise consdition value not flowing inot the invoice

Dear Gurus,
Excise condition value not flowing in to  the invoice from sales order
Thanks
Sasi

Dear lakshmipathi,
Iam entering the BED/Ed/ShEd  values manually....
Where can I check the Tax code in the sales order?Does you mean to say the Tax classification at Item-Shipping tab?
Thanks
Sasi

Similar Messages

  • Excise Duty Value not flow from J1IJ to VF01

    Hi SAP Expert,
    I am facing the problem in Invoice to Customer(from Depot). Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ for pricing procedure JINDEP. I maintained Alt Cal type as 356 in Pricing procedure JINDEP for Excise condition types JEXP. But it is still not flowing. I am using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
    Do I need to go to VTFL In item level copying requirement to set pricing type: to C ??
    But once i set, it will impact other billing document too. Please advise.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    I have successfully posted Excise Invoice at Depot using J1iJ.
    When i create billing via Vf01, i am unable to see the value of Excise Duty in item pricing condition from J1iJ.
    I analyse the pricing condition for condition type JEXP, below is what i got :
    This message tells you that the condition record exists, but has not been set in the document. If pricing was carried out again for the document item, then the condition would be set.
    There are different reasons for this:
    1.The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
    2. The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again.
    If the condition type is used for subsequent settlement (rebate), there may be subsequent updating of business volume (the agreement is is created retrospectively). The document conditions do not contain the condition record, as the condition record was not created when pricing was carried out. Updating of business volume is carried out using special functions for subsequent settlement.
    1. When an item was added, the condition record was accessed with key fields other than change time. This could lead to different results in the requirements check at the time of adding and the change time. This can occur when modifications are made.
    2. In billing (or when copying orders): Certain condition types were not determined in the source document (this is usually controlled by the pricing requirements). When creating the document, the document flow (TVCPF,TVCPA) is processed using a pricing type that does not redetermine these condition types, although they are supposed to be called via the requirements.
    Is it correct that i assigned routine 356 to Pricing Condition JINDEP ?

  • Excise duty values not flowing from PO to MIGO

    All SAP Gurus,
    We have created a PO and used excisable tax code in it.
    Excise duties are calculated correctly in PO.
    When we go for Goods receipt against the PO, excise tab appears, but there are no values in excise fields (fiels are blank).
    System allows us to enter the Excise duty values manually.
    Further excise entries and register updates are happening correcetly.
    We do not undersatnd why the Excise duty values are not flowing automatically from PO to GR (MIGO).
    Please help.
    Regards,

    hi
    chekc following
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>india >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    here give appripriate conditions for ur procedure as per BED   cess and other
    regards
    kunal

  • Base value not flowing in the table

    Dear Experts,
    It is noticed that while creating excise invoices in SAP of exempted goods the base value does not pass into relevant table J_1iexcdtl in transaction type DLFC.
    Please provide any solution.
    thanks in advance

    Dear Experts,
    It is noticed that while creating excise invoices in SAP of exempted goods the base value does not pass into relevant table J_1iexcdtl in transaction type DLFC.
    Please provide any solution.
    thanks in advance

  • Excise duties values not appearing in the RG1 register

    Dear All
    After updation of RG1 register and extraction of the same on  checking the entries in the table J_1IRG1 we are not getting the BED ,Ecess and SECS.In printing of this register the same values are not appearing.
    Further this register is around 524 pages.It is showing per transection.How can we redure no of pages.
    Please guide in this matter.
    deepti

    hi,
    once again check
    1.Tcode: J1id
    2.Tcode:J1iex
    here see part1 created or not check it.
    3. Tcode:J1i5 update register
    4. Check condi.types for SH
    is not fine pls revert back
    regards
    ka

  • Excise value not flowing in MIGO

    Dear All,
    While doing MIGO, the Excise value for BED, ECESS is not flowing but the values are flowing in Purchse order. But the SECESS alone is flowing in both PO and MIGO.
    Points will be rewarded.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Dhinakar

    Hi raja,
    h r u???
    I have maintained all the settings, i thuink some note has to be applied. I will check it...
    Thanks for ur Support
    regards
    Dhinakar

  • Table J_1IEXCDTL - EXBAS isnt updated -Excise Base Amt not flowing to ARE1

    Dear Friends,
    This is in continuation to the earlier post.......Excise Duty Base Amount is not flowing into ARE1...Iam here briefing up the earlier post details:
    When  I am creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice, Excise Duty Base Amount is not flowing into ARE1 but BED and other cess conditions are flowing into ARE1
    Liable to AT1 and  Indicator NCCD is checked and in  my pricing procedure NCCD condition is not maintained as its not required.
    The latest patch updated in my system is SAPKH600011 (Logistics and Accounting).....
    Most importantly the Excise base amount field is not seen in the Excise Invoice but in ARE1 this field is in display mode and Excise base value is not flowing into the Table J_1IEXCDTL field EXBAS.
    Someone Pl help me on this issue.
    Thanks
    Sasi
    Edited by: j sasi on Jul 9, 2008 7:13 AM

    Sasi,
    I think you are making a mistake between manual and mandatory. IN the pricing procedure MAN stands for manual condition and mdt stands for mandatory. Now in the standard, the PR00 is an automatic entry and JASS is a manual and a statistical condition. It is not mandatory. PR00 being the base value for calculation of gross price/nett price it is mandatory.
    Most of the customers prefer a manual pricing procedure where PR00, discount, surcharge everything is manual.
    In such a case change the appropriate condition type to the manual condition with manual has priority in the settings for condition type.
    But here you need to enter the prices and all the conditions manually.
    Here you should have only one condition type for pricing condition with the category as basic price. PR00 is normally that condition and so is the P101 which is a Price ( STO). Now if there are several select all others to statistical and only PR00 with an account key assignment to ERL.
    Ensure that JASS the assesable value as statistical and manual.
    If however you want the JASS as the excise base amount then PR00 will be used for calculation of discounts and and NETT price only but JASS will be the one for Excise base amount.
    BAsed on this excise base amount which you will find in the table J_1IEXCHDR the values for BED, ECS and SECS gets calculated.
    Either way is O.K but one word of caution. There is an assessable value in the J1ID transaction where you maintain the Assessable value for materials. Its mostly used in TAXINJ. DO not use it or even if that field is filled ensure that you give the JASS assessable value manually at the time of calculating SAles ordr pricing.
    If you don;t then there will be an error.
    Also check in the analysis whch condition basis value is being taken for calculated in your excise conditions.
    This should solve your problem.
    Remember calculating assessable value is not a small thing but customers prefer it because reversing excise or paying additional excise is a pain for them. If thats the case then so be it.
    But ensure that assessable value is calculated nett of discounts and given there.
    In one case I came across where otehr charges, finance charges and transportation were added to the basic price and only on the total excise duty was added and discount was given after calculation of excise duty. Please check your scenario in line with your requirement. Any questions. My pleasure to reply.
    regards
    Jude

  • Excise Tab is not  appear in the MIGO display  --- Import Process

    Hi Experts ,
    Excise tab is not appear in the display of the material document in Import process.
    Process flow.
    1. Import Po.
    2. Customs clearing (MIRO)
    3. Capture excise invoice against the Import Po.(Reference to MIRO document )
    4.MIGO with movement type 103, in excise tab i selected only refer the excise invoice , here excise ta is coming . Lot is also generated .
    after posting the material document , excise tab is not appearing against  the material document .
    5. post excise against the excise invoice .
    Please help.
    Thanks
    SAP MM
    Edited by: Subbas on Aug 16, 2010 11:58 AM

    Excise captured & posted using J1IEX using 2 step procedure won't appear in MIGO screen.
    Display excise invoice using J1IEX(using vendor excise inv. no. or internal document no)
    Only excise captured & posted in MIGO(Single step) will be appear in display of MIGO screeen.
    Check SAP Note 952287 - CIN: Limited Functionalities in Country Version India -CIN -Q.no.5
    5. Incoming Excise Invoice capture at Blocked stock 103 is not
    supported in CIN.
    The capture of incoming excise invoice is strictly advised to carryout at
    unrestricted stock and not at blocked stock(103/105) due to architectural
    issues. The capture at blocked stock may cause wrong excise posting.

  • Values not flowing to COPA - PO with Acctt Asgnmt Cat-Ind. Cust. w/o KD-CO

    Dear Friends,
    The users have created a PO with Acctt Asgnmt Cat as "Ind. Cust. w/o KD-CO" while mentioning the Sales Order and GL Account No. in the PO. The GL Account No. defined is that of Inventory Account (Balance Sheet). The issue is that at the time of Invoice Verification, the price was different from the PO value and the difference in the price got debited to the COGS Account, However, even though there was a reference to the PO, while posting the difference to COGS, the system did not create the Profitability Segment and thus the value did not flow to the COPA. But the basic costs debited to COGS at the time of GR has flown to COPA.
    Could any one help in understanding this, is this the normal behavior, and was it correct to mention the Inventory GL in PO instead of COGS A/c.
    Regards

    Hi
    1. I asked you which CO object it is posting to upon PRD... Profit center is not a CO object if the cost element category is 1....
    Your COGS should be ideally Cost Ele Catg 1, which means without a Cost Center, IO or WBS you can not post..
    2. As you say, COGS is flowing to COPA upon PGI, which means Prf Segment is the Cost Object for COGS account
    Similarly, what is the CO object upon PRD and what is your cost ele category?
    3. If it is 12 instead of 1, may be you can post to Profit Center also.. But system gives a warning message KI 166 Enter a true account assignment object with revenues.. You should convert it into Error in OBA5 so that you wont be able to post without a True CO Object
    *4. The notes which I mentioned are both for flowing COGS as well as PRD into Costing based COPA*
    Regards
    Ajay M
    Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Oct 14, 2010 10:35 AM
    Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Oct 14, 2010 10:36 AM

  • FIXED type Attribute value not equal to the default

    Hi
    I am in the processing of doing AP Inbound process. During My process I have created Invoice XML and XSD and mapped with XML Gateway OAG XSD.
    BPEL able to pool the directory and process the XML file. But I am getting below error at XML Gateway error log.
    FIXED type Attribute value not equal to the default
    value ''.
    Could any body let me know when do I get normally this kind of error.
    Regards
    Kiran Akkiraju

    If you have imported the source code you could use a workaroud i have found. Create a new workspace and a new Project. In it create with the wizard a new Struts Controller Page Flow. After, create a action class, and some jsp pages.Then put some Struts components with the Components Palette.Be sure that in the newly created pages, jdeveloper has put the struts taglib. Now you can rebuild your project.
    It seems that jdeveloper does some internal libraries configuration, but when you import the source code, it doesn't do it.
    Hope it helps
    Nicolas Fonnegra M.

  • Assessable value not maintained for the material X

    Dear all,
    i have maintained material chapter ID,Plant and materialchapter id  combination ,assessable value , cenvat determination, and vendor excise details in the transaction J1ID .
    Even after maintaining all these conditions , i am not able to save the po,while saving the po i got a error message that assessable value not maintained for the material X..
    Points will be rewarded for useful suggestions.
    Thanks in Advance.
    velu+91-9789991357

    Hi,
    Search using approriate keywords in SDN, u get most of the details, i have now done the same searched and have pasted below .
    Try ME2N.
    Click on the "dynamic selections" icon and add the release indicator as an additional selection. Enter the release indicators that you class as "awaiting approval" and you will then have your list.
    The ME2* series of transactions are not that much use prior to 4.7, the layout is poor. But if you have 4.7 or later you can get the screen to use the ALV format and this transforms the ME2* (i.e. ME2L, ME2M, ME2N etc.) transactions into VERY useful reports.

  • Cost Center not flowing in the GL view

    Hi Friends,
    The users have made the entries in the system and defined the Cost centers in the respective fields, while posting the documents. However, when we run the GL Report thru FAGLL03, we notice that the Cost Centers do not get displayed in the Report. On further checking the documents posted we find that the cost centers are maintained in the 'Entry View' but these do not flow to the GL view. This is resulting in the values not getting picked up in the Report Painter Form which is based on the table FAGLFLEXT.  How can we chek and waht needs to be done on the config side to enable the values to be flown in the GL view as well and get maintained in the table FAGLFLEXT.
    Thanks for the Help.
    Regards

    Hi Nikhitha,
    As advised by Guarav earlier, the cost center scenario has been maintained and in the GL Cost center field has also been included. But still the cost center is not displayed in the GL view.
    Is there anything else to be checked in this case.
    Regards,

  • Amount is not coming into the Invoice for Warranty Order

    Salute All !!
    Amount is not coming into the Invoice for Warranty Order which is Free of Charge.
    This amount is not going to Customers debtor A/C, means there is no any A/C posting for this specific Amount because this is free of charge Sale (Warranty Order).
    This is required by A/C department to put Value in to the Invoice to show so Transporter can carry the material as 0 value material is unable to Transport.
    Please provide solution.
    Rgds
    Srivastav
    +91-9973504950

    Hi,
    Because you are not billing to customer the net amount is zero-
    You can do like bill the component as regular item and give credit note against it.
    or else create seperate billing output type assign this to proforma invoice- print the cost of item  by pulling it in new smart form.
    (this is not very good idea because , customer knows the actual cost of the item)
    Thanks
    Chidambaram

  • VPRS condition not read in the invoice

    i am facing a issue wherein the cost condition type VPRS is determined in the sales order for the samples but the same condition type is not determined in the invoice. showing a error - In this transaction an error occurs - the material valuation segment or the terms of payment table could not be read or a currency translation has failed.
    Pls suggest what can be the resolution ?

    Hi VK,
    Is there more than one condition in the pricing procedure defined as
    a cost (G) ?
    Please review note 15462 for further details.
    Note 185225 is also relevant to the error VE 217. Please review it too.
    Hope this help.
    Regards,
    Alex

  • %age entered in the Info record condition type is not flowing to the PO

    Dear SAP Experts,
    I have created a condition type ZCV1 by copying the condition type JCV1. But, if I enter the percentage in the JCV1 in the Info Record, it flows to PO, but, the percentage entered for ZCV1 in the inforecord is not flowing to the Purchase Order.
    Request to provide solution for the above problem.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Muthuraman.K

    Sorry , Double Post

Maybe you are looking for

  • Regarding IDOC 2 FILE Scenario

    Hi Friends,                 please help on IDOC 2 File Scenario. I have done tha ALE settings in R3 system and the Idoc has been  generated out of r3 system. but how it wiil be sent to XI server can any body help me on this issue.make it as quick as

  • How to do price comparision in ME49 based on net price

    Dear Experts, I have a problem while doing price comparision I have two RFQ's for the material with same gross price(15). But i have some additional conditions like frieght 20% in second RFQ. So the net price is 18 in the second RFQ. But while doing

  • How to manage TNS entry in the OID ?

    Hello, We are in our way to implement OID to replace multiple TNSNAME.ora files. We are looking for the adequate tool to manage TNS entries in the OID. Does anybody use a Web interface to manage such entry ? or the mandatory tool is Oracle Directory

  • RAC 10.2.0.4, event gc cr block busy & log file switch

    hello everybody, i would like to know if there is any dependencies between gc cr block busy and log switch in the one node of the rac cluster. i had a select and its completion time lasted 12 secs instead of 1, the start time of the select is the sta

  • Firefox crashes when I pressing Browse button to upload files

    Windows 7 x32 Firefox 10.02 The program constantly crashes when I press Browse button (such as gmail attachments, virustotal programs and so on. ) PS I already cleared registry problems and tried to remove MRU from registry, as was mentioned in this