Exclude records with value 0 for calculated KF

Hi, experts,
How do I Exclude records with value 0 for calculated KF without using condition?  I'm using version 7
Appreciate any help you can provide.
Thank You!
Alina

Hi,
We didn't understood ur requirement well.
1) Lets say, you have 3 KF. and you are doing CKF1 and you don't want to show the records with Zero, In that case you can go with Zero Record Supression.
2) If you want to try to delete only KF/CKF where there is zero, it won't work as others may have values in them and you may miss the whole record set in the report
3) If the zero result is part of calculation, then please go ahead as explained above.
Please explain clearly if this is what you have or is it different ?
Regards,
-S-

Similar Messages

  • Table for Analysis authorization along with values for authorization fields

    Hi,
    I am looking for table that contains the Analysis Authorization name along with values for all the authorization fields within this Analysis Authorization. Individually i can go to PFCG or Rsecadmin but since i need all the Analysis auth objects, i need to get this info into excel, so need a table.

    Hi Prashanth
      You can check RSECVAL that is appropriate for your requirement please let us know if any further help is needed.
    Thanks & Regards
    Santosh Varada

  • Parallel ledger with values for past period

    hi
    we are creating addl ledgers with different fiscal year variant
    is it possible for me to fill up this ledger with values for a past period?
    my fiscal year variant is V3 April - March, however I need the parallel ledger for calender year Fiscal Yr Variant K4.
    Going live with this in april is it possible to populate this ledger with values for jan-march period
    regards
    sameer

    HI,
    I am not sure if it is helpful but what you can do is to define an asset movement type limited to a valuation area, which allows you to post for example acquisitions only in on valuation area, but not in the other one.
    Thus you can post ABSO with one asset movement type for one valuation area (APC-value X) for another valuation area use another movement type and post APC value Y.
    Anyway the difference of the APC value (thats not ativated) needs to be posted to an P&L account.
    Maybe there are other/better suggestions from other people.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Asset value for Calculation of Tax Depreciation

    We have been told that many of the assets created as of 1/1/2008 have a different (lower) tax value than their beginning book value.  Book value is correct for standard book depreciation.     Is there a process to update the tax value of assets created in SAP similar to the transaction AS92 used to update values for Converted Assets?
    It was suggested that we use the method of Unplanned Depreciation tcode ABAA with TTY 642/652 to change the tax value of the asset.  When I tested this I found the various tax depreciation methods were calculated based on the beginning book value for year 1 and not using taking the special depreciation into consideration until subsequent years.   This is using Depreciation Area 10, MACRS, Dep. Key M200.
    Is there a better method of altering asset book value for tax purposes or a better way to alter the tax depreciation calculation so it takes Unplanned Depreciation into consideration during year 1?
    Current simplified tax depreciation example:
    Beg. BV $1,000
    unplanned dep posted $100
    tax depreciation for year 1 $100
    tax depreciation for years 2-10 $88.88
    The preferred depreciation is $90 years 1 - 10.
    Thanks for your assistance,
    Jeff

    I think I had the cart before the horse on this problem.  The correct way to look at this is what is the best way to get the correct "Net Book Value" and not the correct tax depreciation posting as it never actually gets booked.  
    By knowing the incorrect Beginning BV, the rate depreciation is applied in year 1 and finally the desired Net BV value at the end of year 1 for tax purposes I am able to calculate the correct Unplanned Depreciation for tax to make everything work out correctly.
    correct beginning tax BV $1,200
    Beginning Asset Book Value $1,800
    depreciation $360 (20% of BV)
    Unplanned depreciation  $?
    Net BV for tax at end of Yr1  $960 ;  or  1,200 - (1,200*.2)
    With the know values above that makes my unplanned depreciation for Yr 1 to be $480.  Year 1 and all following years depreciate correctly after the Unplanned Depreciation is posted.
    I am marking this as resolved unless someone sees an error in my thinking.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

  • Excluding records with 0 quantity in cube 0SD_C15

    Hello BWers,
    I'm attempting to load the condition values into 0SD_15 via 2LIS_13_VDKON. However I get an error message from the update rules:
    "Arithmetical errors or conversion errors found in routine ROUTINE_0001 record 98"
    The reason for the error seems to be that the 0KPRICE info object (Condition rate) is including a formula looking like this:
    KNVAL / INV_QTY
    ...where KNVAL is the 'condition value' and INV_QTY is the 'billing quantity'.
    This means that when the either one of these objects are 0 (zero) then there will be an error for the record.
    I need to exclude the records which have a zero value for these two objects..
    Which is the easiest way to do this?
    - ABAP in the info source?
    - ABAP in the update rules?
    - some other setting?
    How could the code look for this?
    Best regards,
    Fredrik

    I have switched to expert mode in order to be able to enter the code. It looks like this:
    IF KNVAL <> initial and INV_QTY <> initial.
    Price = KNVAL / INV_QTY
    endif.
    However, I'm getting this error message:
    'Opening parenthesis "(" expected'
    How should the code look?
    Best regards,
    Fredrik

  • How to add a list box with values for a ztable in SM30

    Hello Gurus,
                    I had created a table maintenance for Ztable and added many extra functionality to that. Now i would like to add a list box or check table for a field. Can i do that with out Regenerating my table maintenance. Please help me its..very urgent.

    Have referred this domain to the data element, this should be the Field type in ur table for the particular field.
    Eg: <b>SE11 > table name > fields-ZTEST > fieldtype-ZZTEST</b>
    ZZTEST in the data element > create a domain for this data element and in that specify teh value range.
    Save and activate it.
    Make sure that u regenerate teh table maintenance generator else u cant see the changes.
    Now if u press F4 u can see only thevalues specified, also u will see only the list box with values in SM30.
    Try this,please let me know if u face any difficulties.

  • Recording with Garageband for IOS

    I wanted to share a recording or two using the ipad so that people could see that garageband for IOS doesn't suck.  I didn't spend too much time throwing them together, but at the same time they're not too horrible either. They give a pretty decent idea of what a 1st gen ipad with a 5 dollar app is capable of in regards to guitar and shred-type guitar stuff. I'm kind of sick of reading and listening to scathing reviews on how the ipad and Garageband in particular is for non-musicians and noobs who want to sound like they're making music... (ooo that could describe me... yikes!) If I could have had an ipad-like device when I was just getting started, I think that I would be a much better player today. I am totally blown away at the expectations people have of a 5 dollar program, when they haven't spent the time trying to see what it does do well. Anyways, here's hoping that this post helps people out that are trying to find out what the capabilities of an ipad with GB are, especially if they are a guitarist. At the end of the day, it is still the person using the device that either makes it sound horrible, mediocre or amazing...
    So anyways, I decided to make a quick track where I didn't spend too much time on the music, and I used only what was in GB in regards to my tones and stuff; That means all stock amp and pedal combinations. I also wanted a track that focused on guitar parts, and making the best of what the app has to offer. I'm sure with some tweaking and mucking around there could be some much cooler tones generated, but hey... it is what it is. Also, I used a Godin LGXT direct into the ipad with an Apogee Jam. Very inexpensive. Bass and drums were recorded with the Line6 Mobile25. The tablet's screen works too, but I find that the keyboard is a lot more accurate, especially for drums. Obviously, you could go into the drum and guitar parts and edit and tweak the parts further, creating drum parts that feel and sound a bit more lifelike, but I didn't do that here; this one was about direct recorded electric guitar...
    https://soundcloud.com/jayesskerr/ipadgination
    Arguably, you could also record your stuff via microphones also. In this case I used a Roland VS880 as a mixer (It was handy), with 4 CAD microphones connected to it to capture my drum kit. (I'm not much of a drummer, but you get the idea...) I then just lined out of the VS880 into the apogee Jam into the ipad. BANG! This app could work very easily for drummers also... or people who must have their tone and not a digital preset...
    https://soundcloud.com/jayesskerr/just-drums
    I own a couple of good mac boxes loaded with killer software, and I also have some decent interfaces. They are pretty superior in regards to the amount of options that they present, without a doubt. And then when you include all of the 3rd party plugins and loops and stuff that you can get... well, it's very, very nice. The ipad intrigued me because it's self contained, and is extremely portable. It has limitations which force one to be kind of clever in order to work around them. Also, the recording process with an ipad is very, very quick. Setup time is minimal.  So anyways, with just Garageband, and an Apogee Jam (I have the irig connector also, but in my opinion the Jam is so much superior...). The only other thing I'd reccomend is the Line6 Mobilekeys25 which I used here; MUCH easier to enter notes in on bass and drums. Here's some points to sum up my opinions on my experience with the device;
    No it's not better than Logic or Cubase or prottols or something with an interface. It's only a 5 dollar app on a 600 dollar tablet (In my case an outdated 1st generation ipad).
    There's only 8 tracks, but you can bounce and merge.
    The amount of sections is limited, but you can work around that too...
    It's extremely portable. Way less gear to haul and set up, but feel free to use your own stuff with it also...
    GB on a tablet is very, very easy to learn. Super intuitive and quick to use.
    The amount of sections is limited, but again you could always just make another song project and then stitch it together later...
    The amp and pedal emulations aren't as good as Guitar Rig, a line6 Pod Pro hd, or a FAS Axe-FXII. But they aren't horrible, they are certainly pretty good for the price of 5 bucks...
    If you're broke/poor and want to get into recording and sharing your music, this is the ideal way to go about it. Your recording device (The ipad) also makes documents, does email, takes and edits pictures, takes and edits video... The only thing standing in the way of you sounding great is you...
    The 'merge track' option is a powerful tool, especially on your midi tracks.
    No pitch correction. Waaaaaahhh boo hoo! You're gonna have to learn how to sing. Plus, it's only 5 bucks!
    Don't want to use the internal drum sounds? Or want to use your amp's miced sound? Get a small mixer, and connect your mic to that. Then connect the mic to the Apogee Jam (There are other products out there that work better and in stereo, but this would do in a pinch) and you should be good to go.
    I recommend using a small keyboard like the Line6 Mobile Keys 25 to enter your midi/virtual instruments stuff in. For me, using just the pad means more track editing after I enter it...
    The last point is this; there's other software besides just GB. Cubasis anyone?
    Anyways, thanks for checking this out, I hope that it helps, and if anyone else has any opposing viewpoints or points to add, please do.
    http://www.guitarius.net
    http://www.youtube.com/user/Scottulus

    Yes, I do it all the time. The best I have found is the Apogee iMiC. Here is a link.  http://www.apogeedigital.com/products/mic.php

  • Costing run with values for material from info record.

    Hi All
    there is requirement with my client, that when i run my costing run the values of the components in BOM should be from the latest purchase order.
    For this i am maintined valuation criteria as price from info record and sub strategy as gross price from PO.
    When i am create a PO the info record is created automatically in background. So when i run costing run the value is picked correctly.
    Now when i create a PO with same material from diff vendor the info record is generated, but on costing run it picks the value from the info record of earlier vendor. For this i go and check the conditions tab in info record, ensure its balnk and save it. Again generate new PO and then run a costing run. This time the system reads the latest info record.
    My problem is that i want to ensure that during the costing run, system should read the latest info record w/o manual intervention. System behaviour is not consistent when there is multiple vendor and same material info records. Sometimes it pick up the value and sometimes it refers the old info record.
    Can any one help me out in resolving this issue. Its critical.
    Regards
    Rakesh

    Hi!
    Generally first info records will be created with vendor, then PO will be created, based on info records price, price will be updated in PO.
    If you have more than one vendor for same material, you have to create info records for each vendor. then you need to maintain source list, where you can fix the vendor. If there is no fix vendor, then you can do schedule agreement with vendors, where you have to give proportionate percentages again each vendor.
    Now for costing run :
    1. if you have only one info record, the price will take from that info record.
    2. if you have more than one info record, you need to mantain source list, where you can tick the fixed vendor, then system will take price from that vendor info record.
    3. if there is no fixed vendor and you have maintained scehduel agreement with weightage to vendor, then higher percentage vendor info record price will be picked up.
    4. if you have more info reocrds, not maintianed source list or schedule agreement, price will be picked up from first info record ( based on info record creation date).
    5. if you have a schedule agreement, but you have given equal weightage for example 50% and 50%, then also system will pick up from first info record.
    i think it is clear now.
    regs,
    ramesh b

  • Taking display value for calculations using structures in Bex query

    Hi
    I am using Bex analyzer to do a simple report with two key figures ‘Sales’ and ‘Plans’ from cube and two more calculated key figures ‘Abs Deviation’ and ‘% error’. The report displays at category and product levels. Category is higher and one category contains multiple products.
    The simple formulas for the two calculated KF are,
    1. Abs Deviation = Abs (Sales – Plans).
    Abs Deviation is set with the property Calculate result as ‘summation’ to add up Abs deviations at product level to show at Category level.
    2. % Error = Abs Deviation / Plan.
    The issue is with the % Error value at category level. At product level, all the values are showing correctly.
    To illustrate the issue with a simple test case,
    CategryProductSale-PlanAbs Dev----%Error
    C1--P1--100-60---40--
    67%
    C1--P2---50120---70--
    58%
    C1 Total--150180---110--
    17%
    Observe that in the output the calculation for ‘%Error’ at product level is correct all the way. But the summary
    calculation for ‘Error%’ i.e. C1 total which is showing as 17% is wrong. The correct value as per the formula should be 110/180 = 61%.
    SAP, through OSS replied that it is not a bug but the default behavior of OLAP calculation. OLAP processor first calculates the formula for % Error and then shows the display value at C1 total for Abs Dev. Meaning, ‘% Error’ is calculated first and next the summation for Abs dev is displayed. Abs dev 110 at C1 level is only a display value but not the value taken for % Error at C1 level. Instead OLAP calculates the Abs Dev at C1 level by Total sale – Total plan = 180 – 150 = 30 and the % Error calculation takes this 30 value in the formula and gives % Error = 30/180 * 100 = 17% at C1 level. But 17% doesn't make any sense to the user. Further, to display value of 61% at % Error at C1, it is being advised that by defining two structures, I can force the calculation to take display value of 110 in the % Error calculation at C1 level by using the cell editor.
    Has any body tried to achieve similar result as above by defining two structures and cell editor in the query? If so, can you please throw some pointers of how to define two structures in a query and how to force the % Error at category level to take the display value of 110 in the calculation? I have gone through the documentaion on structures and cell editor but the approach is not at all clear.
    Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
    Prasad
    Unilever Asia IT department

    Hi,
    Have u read aabout the Formula Collision.
    Take a look on this link .
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw32/helpdata/en/d2/02223c5f00612be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    Read the Formula Collision, and let us know , whether your pb is solved by changing the Formula Collision of % error formula.
    With rgds,
    Anil Kumar Sharma .P
    Kindly assign points , If it really helps you.

  • No sound during record with soundblaster for Vi

    I have Windows Vista and am using Audigy Advanced MB Sound Blaster Wave Studio to record music from a multi-track recording source. Wave Studio records it just fine and will play it back well, but I can't hear the music while I'm recording it, which is necessary for me to hear levels of various instruments as they appear in the song, etc.. I've spoken with Dell and Creative and both sides tell me the other one is responsible for support for this item. I find it hard to believe Creative doesn't support it's own product, or at least supply me with an instruction manual.
    Does anyone know of this problem, and is there a fix for it's? Neither Dell nor Creative are helping me in the least bit. P.S. This feature did work on a previous version of the Creative software on a previous computer that ran Windows XP. Now I've got a new computer with Vista, and a new Creative software disk that is made for Vista. Any suggestions??

    Thanks. It worked. I was equally frustrated. I just followed your text and now, hopefully, we are back on track!
    Many thanks for your posting.

  • Best way to pre-populate material variable with values for users

    Hi,  I have a requirement to prepopulate a material variable with about 5 materials and that is the materials that will default when the query is called.  The users would also need the ability to change those values.
    My thought is to create a User-exit variable that derives the values from a user maintained table (infoobject). 
    Does anyone else have any suggestions or ideas on the best way to handle this?

    I don't know if there is a best solution...
    Infoobject
    With this option you have to create a new infoobject (ZMATERIAL) without attribute (you need only a list material codes) and then to set the authorization profile for the user in order to manage the content.
    The creation of an infoobject corresponds to a table creation, but you don't need any other specific options that belong to the infooject (as technical object)...
    Table
    With this option you have to create a Z table with only one field and then to allow the maintenance of the table by SM30....
    In the ending, if you want to be a purist use the table, otherwise use an infoobject (but there are no significant differences !
    Bye,
    Roberto

  • Change of base value for calculation of Excise.

    Hi All,
    I have a senario which needs to be maaped in SAP. Please help in maaping the senario.
    We are purchasing Oil from manufacturer like IOCL & HPCL. The contract is such that, the excise is calculated on the proce of the oil on the day the chalan has been created. Eg:-
    Contract base price is 100
    Ed@ 14.42%                14.42
    But on the day of despatch the base price is 110, hence the excise will be calculated on 110 only not on 100.
    So in PO we want to maintain a condition apart from basic price PBXX and PB00 on which only the excise will be calculated. The excise shouldnt be calculated on PBXX & PB00.
    So please tell me how to map this in pricing procedure using routine.
    Regards,
    Mohar

    Hi,
    I hope your requirement can be met using the manual Excise condition - JEXC in MM Pricing Procedure by maintaining  the subtotal as 5.
    Enter the JEXC condition in PO Item condition manually & enter the amount on which excise needs to be calculated.
    Based on subtotal 5 the value will flow to tax procedure automatically & excise will be calculated on the same.
    Hope its clear.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Cumulative Value for calculation in Formula

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement to use a formula based onthe cumulation of Keyfigures in the report.
    The scenario is like this
    KF1  KF2    ***(KF1)  ***(KF2)     Fornula1 = ***(KF1) / *** (KF2)
    10     2       10                     2           5
    20     3       30                     5           6
    30     4       60                     9           6.7
    40      5      100                   14          7.1
    while we can display cumlative values of KF1 and KF2 in reports by using the calculation tick the cumulative valuses cannot be used in formula
    Is there any work around

    Hi,
    As you now know that cumulated Kfs cannot used in a formula, why don u try creating cumulated Kfs using some Time chracteristics?
    Like this you can hard code the cumulation.
    You can use SAp exit variables on Time characteristics to keep these values dynamic.
    Hope this helps,
    Sharmishtha

  • Table with Values for Displaying Icons in a Report

    I have found a report that displays red, green and yellow lights to help users to quickly review the results.
    Code has statements such as WRITE: AT /1 '@5B@' AS ICON. "(GREEN LIGHT)
      WRITE: AT /1 '@5C@' AS ICON. "red light
    I would like to know where I can go in SAP to see what other ICONS can be displayed and what the code would be.
    For example - I found the writing WRITE: AT /1 '@5D@' AS ICON - and using @5D@ you get a yellow warning.
    Thanks!
    Scott

    Rob,
    Code value will not be available in table ICON.
    its available in Type group ICON
    ie SE11--> select Type Group > ICON> display
    Here is sample
    CON_2 ICON_DUMMY                     '@00@'."  PlaceholderIcon
    ICON_2 ICON_CHECKED                   '@01@'."  Checked; OK
    ICON_2 ICON_INCOMPLETE                '@02@'."  Incomplete
    ICON_2 ICON_FAILURE                   '@03@'."  Failed
    ICON_2 ICON_POSITIVE                  '@04@'."  Positive
    a®

  • Report on Open Items along with Qty & Value for LA confirmed items

    Hi,
    I would like to know a report of Open POs(No Goods receipt made) but LA confirmed Items along with Values(Amount)
    i.e
    List of confirmed,unsent items along with Values for plant wise or vendor wise or PO Number wise.
    Regards,
    Vengat

    Hi,
    Any other inputs?
    Our client's requirement is to know how many (Both Qty & Value) of items for the input LA confirmed(ASN received) but no GR Made
    Regards,
    Vengat

Maybe you are looking for