Excluding the asset from depreciation

Hi,
We are trying to run restart run, from AFAB . One perticular auc asset is ending in an error, that account for unplanned depreciation is missing.
"Account 'Accumulated dep. account unpl. deprec.' could not be found for area 01"
Now some how, this asset had unplanned depreciation postings, which we reversed in AB08.
After that below are the asset values.
But the restart run in 2013 period 11, still ends in the above error.
Please let me know how this can be solved. Can the asset be excluded from depreciation?
Regards
SR

Hi,
Depreciation is posted for all the assets at a same time. You cannot ignore or post only for a single Asset. Now here in your case its showing that unplanned depreciation is posted in period 11 whereas its reversed in period 12. So I thin kif you execute AFAB for period 12, for Fiscal Year 2013 in planned values, then system will post the values in the assets and the Asset values will be nil. I think that you have reversed the Document through AB08 in 12th period.
Regards,
Malhar.

Similar Messages

How to exclude an asset from depreciation

At end of audit for March 2014, a part of an asset was reduced and charged as a period cost. Financial year was opened to post this transaction and was closed after it was posted. It was posted in an asset class which depreciates at 20%. The client does not want to depreciate that asset as that was posted on the last day of the year. I have two questions regarding this transaction: 1. Is there any way to exclude only a part of an asset transaction? Per my knowledge, as it is a part of an asset class, removing depreciation key is not a possible solution. 2. Should they post depreciation in repeat run as depreciation for 11 periods is already posted?

Hi Pravin,
It is complicated now. Please share your system release and are you using new or old depreciation method. (Is EA-FIN Active)
If i were you, In test system i will try to post a document with reversal value, in current period with current posting date, but try change the "Asset value date" in line item field, using AB02.
Than check if system is reconsidering the asset depreciation amount for whole year in current period. (execute AFAR, on specific asset and check if change happens)
I hope that shall work.
Than you can make the required adjustments in appropriate periods per audit concerns in P& L or B/S accounts.
Pankaj Bansal

Block the Asset for Depreciation Posting

Hi All,
Can anybody please tell me as to how to block the asset from depreciation posting. I need to stop the depreciaiton being posted to some assets.
Regards,
S.Suman

Tick the "DEACT" check box in depreciation area tab in asset master (AS02). This will deactivate depreciation posting to that perticular asset.
Harshal

How can we Transfer The Assets From Legacy to SAP

Hi Experts,
how can we transfer the assets from legacy system to sap when business in production ,what is the procedure for transfer the assets.
Regards,
Harish

Hello Harish,
Please kindly refer to SAP Libray for more information about
intercompany transfer.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/4f/71e18a448011d189f00000
e81ddfac/frameset.htm
-> Asset Accounting (FI-AA)
->Other transaction during Life of an Asset
->Intracompany and intercompany Asset Transfer
   ->Intercompany Asset Transfer(Between company codes)
Please also refer to following notes and SAP library for further.
information.
310346 ABT1 Defining transfer variant gross
327088 Definition of the delivered transfer variants
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/17/1d3c3934f18443e1000000
0a114084/frameset.htm
-> Asset Accounting (FI-AA)
->Other transaction during Life of an Asset
->Intracompany and intercompany Asset Transfer
   ->Intercompany Asset Transfer(Between company codes)
    ->Automatic Intracompany Asset Transfer
     ->Transfer Variant
I hope this helps,
regards
Ray

Excluding the index from the page numbers

Hi,
is it possible to exclude the index from the page numbers? My index is 5 pages long and I want the first page of the first chapter to start at page 1, not on page 6.
Any hint? Anything to do with sections?
Thanks!

Solved, thanks to this topic:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2046762&tstart=0

HOW TO TRANSFFER THE ASSET FROM ONE ASSET CLASS TO ANOTHER

Hello,
At the time of asset uploading ,one asset was uploaded in a wrong asset class and now
I want to transffer that asset from wrong asset class to right one with depriciation value. I dont know what are to be checked before transffer and what are the process to transffer.please suggest me.
Thanks and Regards
Debjit Roy
Moderator: do not use CAPITAL letters and don't ask basic SAP questions

Hi
If you have done any posting to asset which is under wrong asset class, the same values you will post thru FB01 for values only.
you need to transafer the asset no from one asset class to another asset class

Excluding the wages from Infotype 2010

Hello there!
I want to Payroll schema to exclude the information stored in Infotype 2010 or Table P2010 (however you would like to consider it).
Please let me know where do you add or remove such validation. I could find for 14 and 15 but unsure of where is 2010.
You can give me direct PCR/Schema or a path such as:
XT00 -> XAP9 -> P0015 Disable the line with P0015 to exclude all Additional Payments in Payroll Processing.
Thanks
Yash

Friends
As I check the US Schema, I see the 2010 is processed in subschema UT00.
U000 -> UT00 -> P2010
If I disable the same line with * all the wages stored in 2010 should not be processed by schema. I don't have the development server or test server ready yet so cannot say for sure. Can someone please confirm me if I am going right?
Thanks
Yash

Availability Chk at Plnt level excluding the stk from some storage locatn

Hello Gurus,
I want to configure availability check at Plant Level which should exclude stock from few storage location. Example: if Plant 1000 is having 20 Storage location, at the time of availability Check it should consider only stock of 15 storage location and not the other 5 storage location.
How do i achieve this scenario.
Note: the 5 storage location which it should not consider can have unrestricted stock.
Thanks
Prashant Ranalkar

>
Prashant Ranalkar wrote:
> Hello Gurus,
>
> I want to configure availability check at Plant Level which should exclude stock from few storage location. Example: if Plant 1000 is having 20 Storage location, at the time of availability Check it should consider only stock of 15 storage location and not the other 5 storage location.
> How do i achieve this scenario.
> Note: the 5 storage location which it should not consider can have unrestricted stock.
>
> Thanks
>
> Prashant Ranalkar
Hi Prashant,
You could check this on "Availability Check Control " screen,
There is a chack box to select " Storage location", This indicator is used to set the scope of the availability check. It is used to switch off the check at storage location level.
Hope this will help you for further analysis.
SAN..

How to exclude the stock from MRP in MS04.

Hi SAP ALL,
My client req the stock maintain the for the long term planning purpose under one storage location stock not considered to the MRP. in MS04 T Code.this is issue where did i m setting plz give some detailed explanation
regards
raju

Hi,
In transaction OMIR, choose your plant & then for the storage location you want to exclude from MRP enter 1 (exclude from MRP).
After this setting is maintained, whenever a material is created in this plant & storage location, it will have MRP indicator as "1" in the mrp 4 view .
For materials already in this storage location if the MRP indicator "1" is not maintained in mrp 4 view, please go for a mass change maintenance in the material master & maintain this indicator.
Stock in the excluded storage location will not add up to the stock which is displayed in the top in the md04 screen. This stock will be displayed separately in the bottom of the screen.
Please check same with MS04.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

How to exclude the data from the query ?

Hi all,
I got the following sql script :-
SELECT OS.SL_DT, OS.sl_item_code, OS.SL_REF, (OS.sl_val_1) recp,B.CGCV_VALUE_1
FROM OS_STK_LEDGER OS, ( SELECT cgcv_item_code, CGCV_STK_QTY_BU, CGCV_COST_1, CGCV_VALUE_1
                         FROM OS_COST_GROUP_CURR_VAL
                         WHERE CGCV_COST_GROUP_CODE = 'ACOSG'
                         AND CGCV_GRADE_CODE_1 = 'G1' ) B
WHERE OS.sl_dt <= TO_DATE('31/05/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
AND OS.sl_rcvd_issd = 'R'
AND (OS.sl_txn_code = 'SGRN' OR OS.sl_txn_code = 'PGRN' OR OS.SL_TXN_CODE = 'SAOP' )
--AND (os.SL_REF LIKE 'CRE%' OR os.SL_REF LIKE 'UT%' OR os.SL_REF LIKE 'MAR%' OR os.SL_REF IS NULL )
AND B.CGCV_ITEM_CODE(+) = OS.SL_ITEM_CODE
AND OS.SL_COST_GROUP_CODE(+) = 'ACOSG'
AND sl_grade_code_1 = 'G1'
order by sl_item_code, sl_dt
The following output will be :-
Date_______Item__Code________V1___V2
01/01/2012_AAA___CRE1005____100___200
02/02/2012_AAA___ABC1005_____50____200
02/03/2012_AAA___CRE1005_____90____200
01/03/2012_BBB___ABC1005_____50____1000
04/04/2012_BBB___ABC1005_____12____1000
From the output, when group by item & code, I am actual needs only Code with CRE1005, but for item : AAA group, I cannot delete code of ABC1005 because it consists of code with CRE%. For item : BBB, where Code not like CRE% then the two records actually I don't need to select in my SQL.
Can anyone help me to think about ways of solving this issue ?
Thanks.
Lim

with t
as
select to_date('01/01/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'CRE1005' code, 100 v1, 200 v2 from dual
union all
select to_date('02/02/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'ABC1005' code, 50 v1, 200 v2 from dual
union all
select to_date('02/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'CRE1005' code, 90 v1, 200 v2 from dual
union all
select to_date('01/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'BBB' item, 'ABC1005' code, 50 v1, 1000 v2 from dual
union all
select to_date('04/04/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'BBB' item, 'ABC1005' code, 12 v1, 1000 v2 from dual
-- Output sample ends.
-- Original select begins
select t1.dt, t1.item, t1.code, v1, sum_v1, v2
from t t1,
        select item, code, sum(v1) sum_v1
        from t
        group by item, code
        ) t2
where t1.item =t2.item
    and t1.code = t2.code;
DT       ITEM CODE            V1     SUM_V1         V2
01.01.RR AAA CRE1005        100        190        200
02.02.RR AAA ABC1005         50         50        200
03.02.RR AAA CRE1005         90        190        200
03.01.RR BBB ABC1005         50         62       1000
04.04.RR BBB ABC1005         12         62       1000
5 rows selected.
with t
as
select to_date('01/01/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'CRE1005' code, 100 v1, 200 v2 from dual
union all
select to_date('02/02/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'ABC1005' code, 50 v1, 200 v2 from dual
union all
select to_date('02/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'AAA' item, 'CRE1005' code, 90 v1, 200 v2 from dual
union all
select to_date('01/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'BBB' item, 'ABC1005' code, 50 v1, 1000 v2 from dual
union all
select to_date('04/04/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') dt, 'BBB' item, 'ABC1005' code, 12 v1, 1000 v2 from dual
-- Output sample ends.
-- Original select begins
select t1.dt, t1.item, t1.code, v1, sum_v1, v2
from t t1,
        select item, code, sum(v1) sum_v1
        from t a
        where exists
                select 1
                from t b
                where code like 'CRE%'
                    and a.item = b.item
        group by item, code
        ) t2
where t1.item =t2.item
    and t1.code = t2.code;
DT       ITEM CODE            V1     SUM_V1         V2
01.01.RR AAA CRE1005        100        190        200
02.02.RR AAA ABC1005         50         50        200
03.02.RR AAA CRE1005         90        190        200
3 rows selected.

Transfer assets from one asset class to another having different depreciation keys.

Hi Gurus,
     I am a noob in FICO, and I am facing a problem while transferring assets from one asset class to another.
Below is the scenario.
I created two assets 100000000000-0 under asset class 4690a and 200000000000-0 under asset class 4690b. And I am trying to transfer the
asset from class 4690b to 4690a by selecting the option ‘New Asset’ in the transaction ABUMN. While doing this, I am receiving an error message as below.
'Posting with trans. type 300 not possible (No acquisition posted).'
     Message No. AA324.
Diagnosis:
     Transaction type 300 belongs to a transaction type group, which can only be used to post to assets to which posting has already been performed. However, no postings have been made to this asset.
Procedure:
     Use a transaction type from a transactio type group, which can be used for the first acquisition to an asset.
The error is related to the transaction type which I hadn’t explicitly created anywhere. But, when checked in transaction AO76, the transaction type 300 belongs to the transaction type group 30. In this group I am not able to find any solution related to the error.
Moreover, in some of the threads in SCN, I read that modifying the transaction type group might lead to something fatal.
Kindly help me in the below.
1. What exactly the error message is related with?
2. Is there any other method to transfer the asset to another class?
Please let me know if any further details are required regarding the scenario.

Hi ,
I understand that you want to transfer the old asset to new asset with different asset class with different depreciation keys and the old asset is not yet capitalized and does not have any Asset Values.
Assuming that since the First Asset is not yet capitalized, that seems to be that its just that ASset Master is created and no Asset Values appear in the Asset.(in other words no acquisition, capitalization, no dep. start etc.)..
Alternatively this asset can be advised to be blocked and flagged for deletion and create a new Asset in the new Asset Class and then capitalize the new asset by doing the acquisition according to the business process i.e. either via PO based process(GR) or Non PO based process.
The transfer of asset is required incase the old asset still have the values and you are transferring the old asset to new one with the left over values.
Also would request you to kindly share some screenshots of the AW01n of the old asset and screenshots of the AS03 to have more idea on it and provide a better solution to the same..
Warm Regards,
Vineet

How to suppress compiler errors without excluding database objects from the "Schema Compare" tool (using VS2013/SSDT)

Hi,
In short: How to suppress compiler errors without excluding the object from the "Schema Compare" tool ??
A bit longer:
We have a SQL Server 2008 project in Visual Studio 2013 running SQL Server Data Tool.
An old database, with a lot of history in, has been imported into SSDT and there are many syntax errors preventing the project from compiling/running. An typical error is: "SQL70001: This statement is not recognized in this context".
Running the "faulty" scripts on the server, executes just fine. I understand that there are syntax errors and they should be rewritten, but it's not gonna happen just like that - it is a slow process over a long period of time.
I know it is possible to change Build Action to None, but that also exclude the object from appearing in the Schema Compare function/window.
So - how to ignore some compiler errors and still having the objects to appear when doing "Schema Compare" ??
Thank you in advance.

Hi Steven,
Thanks for your comments.
Well, it sure does help in the future, but right now i would prefer the other way - to suppress some errors and still allow the scripts to build.
The thing is that if we "rewrite" the objects into create scripts, then we have a huge test job ahead of us + the database environments (PROD vs DEV and UAT) does not share the same AD or DB users and therefore grants is lost if dropping/creating
objects, right!
If you drop a object before creating it, the drop will also drop the roles and grants and since they don't share user table, the create will not be able to add the permissions again. There might be a solution to that, but it is going to be very complicated
for some newbies like us. We need something we can trust.
BR
Peter

No effect on the revaluation value of the asset after write-off

My user have written off Some of the Assets from Transaction ABAV; only Book value of the Assets is effecting in Balance Sheet; but there is no effect in the Revaluation value.
When the user is doing the REPEAT depreciation run in AFAB, it is not happening.
Can anybody suggest what could be the reason.
Regards,
Sudish

solved.

Uploading assets in depreciation area

Hi
We have a very typical situation. We have assets in area 01. They have a Gross Book Value and Accumulated depreciation on them. But these assets are NOT in area 22 (local area).
We need to extend these assets to area 22 and then upload the Gross Book Value and Accumulated depreciation balances as on 31.12.2014 in area 01 to area 22.
How can this be done? Our year end is December 31 therefore also consider asset fiscal year end closing. If you can share some document on how this could be done, it would be great.
Will it be better to have the balances loaded with 01.01.2015 instead of Dec 31 2014.
Best wishes
Raj.

Hi Raj,
The procedure is as follows:
1. Create Depreciation area via OADB.
2. Activate Depreciation area via OAYZ.
3. Automatic opening of new depreciation are via AFBN and program
   RAFABNEW :
   3.1     Indicator: Leave values initial = not ticked.
           Do not set this indicator if you want the system
           to copy the values from depreciation area 01.
   3.2     Indicator: Leave values initial = ticked.
           Set this indicator if you want to open the newly created
           depreciation area without any values i.e. blank.
4. Recalculate depreciation via AFAR and program RAAFAR00.
Encluded note 317806.
Best regards Bernhard

Deleting Asset with Depreciation Posting

Hello,
My user has created the asset in the incorrect asset class, but this asset has already being depreciated last period and I can't use the AS06 transaction to delete it.
How do I delete this asset to create the new one in the correct class?
Regards
Barbara

You transfer the asset from one asset class to another -- using intracompany transfer ABUMN.

Excluding the asset from depreciation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for