Expired Useful Life field is missing in AS91

Hi,
I'm preparing LSMW to upload asset legacy via AS91, but there is no Expired Useful LIfe for year and period. Is there any setting to set the screen layout rule for AS91? Or, it is caused by other setting?
Thanks,
CW

Hi,
It's combined in the screen layout rule for depre area.
Thanks,

Similar Messages

  • Making Useful life field optional in Asset master creation(AS01)

    Hi all,
    I want to make 'Useful life' field in 'Depreciation area' tab as optional in AS01 (Asset master).
    1. I made the screen layout changes using AO21 and made Useful life optional
    2. I assigned the above screen layout in OAYZ
    Despite doing this, during asset master creation, the field still shows as 'Required' and not as 'optional'.
    Am I missing anything else?  Kindly provide some pointers.
    Thanks,
    Sridevi

    Hi Sridevi
    Please check your depreciation key. If your depreciation is based on useful life, the key is required regardless the field status.
    Thanks
    Sanjeev

  • FI-AA NO Expired useful life

    Hi 各位，
    2011资产年结后，修改成了新的资产年度，但所有2011年12月入账的，2012年01月开始折旧的资产都需要没有 Expired useful life in years at start of the fiscal year/Period ，老是提示为必输项目，这两个栏位。
    不知道什么原因，请各位看看.

    你好
    你可以通过更改折旧领域的画面设置，把这两个项目不显示。
    AS02  -> Menu: Environment -> screen layout -> depreciation areas -> select a screen layout -> double click on ‘field group rules’ -> set field group ’19 Expired useful life’ and ’20 Exprd Life -Periods’ in ‘No display’.
    希望对你会有所帮助
    George

  • Asset master data no "Expired useful life".

    Hi expert.
    Today our user tell me ,system need her that to enter the filed (ANLC-NDABJ/NDABP) of  * expired useful life in year /period *  in depreciation area tab . otherwise not allow to save the data.
    And i found, all of asset capitalized period on 2011.12 and the start depreciation period on :2012.01 ,the Expired useful life year/period is null and requirement to input the value.
    when we enrty the expired useful period.
    Expired useful life 000 000 calculated by system (Check)
    Message no. AA910
    My question:
    What's reason and how to fix it ?
    Thanks,
    Regards,Alex

    Hi,
    Usually Expired life will be displayed in Asset master once the acquisition. If your capitalization date is in the previous fiscal year (in your case: 2011.12) and in the next period you will able to see asset expired period as 01 period(assume next fiscal year is starting from 2012-01).
    I guess you should maintain your capitalization and ordinary depreciation date  one and the same

  • Function module to read the expired useful life of asset

    Hi,
    Is there a function module to read the expired useful life of asset. We are using the depriciation start date to calculate the expired useful life of asset, but the fiscal year shift and matching the calendar year with fiscal is causing the logic to give a month difference between the calculated value and the value in the asset.
    Please let me know if there is a Function module or BAPI for getting the values. Kindly provide example for the function module call too.
    Regards,
    Prabaharan.G

    Hi,
      Check the following function modules.
    AISC_CALC_EXPIRED_USEFUL_LIFE.
    Check the following link it might be of some help to you.
    Re: asset useful life
    Regards,
    Ram.

  • Useful life is asking mandatory field in asset master data

    while asset master creation useful life is asking mandatory field in dep.key : ZSLU. actually i have to give "ZERO" in useful life field. i have set screen layout in AO21 also.again asking mandatory field. I got the one point, I think this is the problem,
    Note: Base method 0011 (Ordinary: percentage from useful life) already assigned in dep. Key ZSLU. If we assigned in dep. key ZSLU, we should give positive values for useful life in asset master data.
    I changed base method 0002 instead of 0011, it was accepted, If i change base method(0011),
    i want base method instead of 0011?
    which base method i have to give? please give suggestion?
    Thanks
    indu

    Hi ,
    i have changed optional field also. it's asking mandatory, i have tested base method 0002 instead of 0011. if i give 0002 or other base method, it is accepting.
    Note: if we mention base method 0011, we must give passitive values in useful life.
    what i have to do? please tell me?

  • Depriciation key and useful life periods in asset master should in display mode only

    Hi all
    At the time of creation asset master AS01 we are given the Asset class, company code and similar of asset (1) then we click enter button we will get Create asset: master data screen here in general tab we enter the description and in time dependent tab we enter cost center manually
    But
    When we click on Depreciation tab here the  Depreciation key and use life fields are automatically come with Dep.key(ABC) and use life(15) (Because we maintained in OAYZ)
    Here user have a chance to change the Dep.key(ABC) and use life(15).so my requirement is these two fields are display with only display mode .
    User don’t have chance to modify this.

    Hi Anil,
    The screen layout for Asset and its depreciation tab are different. You have to make these fields as Display only in the screen layout. This can be done using T-Code AO21. Below are the screenshots for the path and screen layout for your reference. This should solve your issue
    Regards
    Pankaj Pareek

  • Calculation of Depreciation based on Remianing Useful Life

    Hi
    I have a scenario in which depreciation percentage should be derived based on remaining useful life and it should remain same through out the remaining useful life.
    For eg,
    Take over date = 30.11.2010
    Acquisition Date= 01.04.2009
    Acquisition Amount = INR 200000
    Depreciation Till 30.11.2010 = 70000 INR
    Net Book Value as of 30.11.2010 = INR 130000
    Total Useful Life = 4 Years or 48 months
    Expired Useful Life = 1 year 9 months or 21 months
    Remaining useful life = 27 months
    Required Depreciation Per Month = 130000/27=4815
    Derived Percentage = 4815/130000*100=3.71%
    I have created a Base Method for calculation for Depreciation with Depreciation Method as "% from Remaining Life calculated from Depreciation Conversion Date". In Multilevel methods, I have assigned the Base Method as 24, Net Book Value
    and maintained the check box for Remaining useful life.
    However, the system is not calculating the  rate as expected.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

    Hi Sanil
    Have you done any settings in OAYF - recalculate dep for previous years (IMG> AA > Asset Data Transfer > Parameters for Data Transfer > Options)
    For current year, it always does produce some difference due to rounding off, which should not be a big amount
    Ajay M

  • Asset useful life change

    Hi,
    I have asset with useful life 10 years. Expired useful life 5.3 years.
    I am trying to change useful life to 5.6 years so that i can depreciate asset fully in coming 3 periods. Net book value should be ZERO after 3 months, and in Asset explorer also planned depreciation should be shown for 3 periods.
    if i enter 5.6 years in useful life, the depreciation is calculating for 5.6 years and in planned also showing for 5.6 yrs instead of  for 3 periods.
    Below are the depreciation key parameters:Depreciation key 1st phase from the start of depreciation
    Base method 0007 Ordinary depreciation from useful life
    period control  007 01/06/02/02
    Multilev.meth.    045    APC, any life
    Chnge. method 5 change over after end of the useful life
    Please help
    Thanks
    Hari

    Hi,
    1) Please see in AW01N in Parameters the following indicators:
    Useful life     010 / 000
    Exp. usefl life 005 / 003
    Remaining life  004 / 007
    If you change the Useful life is should be:
    Useful life     005 / 006
    Exp. usefl life 005 / 003
    Remaining life  000 / 003
    2) The depreciation will be corrected as a result of changing useful life.
    How it is corrected?
    It depends on your setting sin OAYR (smoothing or catch-Up). Please see following threat:
    Smoothing- explaination.
    3) You have created a change over method:
    "5 Changeover after end of the useful life"
    So, the depreciation changes into second phase:
    Of you make the second phase similar to depr. key  DG20 or DG30, the asset will be fully depreciated, after end of useful life.
    But: the change over can only happen after end of a fiscal year.
    Regards Bernhard

  • Issue in ABT1N(Intercompany transfer) - expired/remaining life

    We are executing ABT1N for Inter company tranfer.
    In Transfer variant, field transfer Group 19 & 20 - we have selected copy check box.
    (Accounting is perfectly alright)
    However, when we execute this transaction, expired/remaining useful life is not getting copied correctly into new asset.
    Copying pattern is for example:
    Old asset                                                       New Assets
    Useful life            4 years                                4 years
    Expired Life         3 years 8 months                  4 years 4 months
    Reamianing life    4 months                              Nil
    Above indicates that for new asset - Expired life, year is copied from Useful life(old asset) & period(month) is copied from Reamaining life(old asset). This is incorrect.
    Kindly advise any suggestion/corrective action so that Expired & Reamaining life are updated correctly in New Asset
    Thanks
    Nikhil

    Hi Prasad,
    Please reconfirm whether you maintained AO90 settings for below mentioned items..
    Contra account: Acquisition value
    Acquisition from affiliated company
    Please find below the expected entries.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • SLED field is missing in ECC 6.0

    Hello!!!
    we're upgrading from 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
    I have a problem with SLED field in MIGO transaction in ECC 6.0
    For not batch-managed materials, the SLED check is activated.
    1)In Custimizing, the plant and movement type are actived.
    2) remining self life in Material master plant stock view -> 0 Days
    3)The PO -> 0 Days
    4) Info record -> 0 Days
    WHen we enter the MIGO transaction, in Material tab, the SLED field is missing, so we can't enter de SLED. If I maintain in PO or material, more than 0 Days, the field is open, but It doesn't work with 0 Days...
    In 4.6C version, the SLED filed is open, and It's OK.
    I don't find the solution...any idea???
    Thanks ins advance.
    Best regards
    María.

    Hello,
    thank you so much.
    I think that there is not soultion. SAP told me:
    Dear Maria ,
    You have set the Maximum period, Minimum remaining shelf life and
    Total shelf life as zero. I tested this on our internal test system
    and when these are all set to zero the fields PROD & SLED are not
    visisble in the Material tab in tcode MIGO.
    The shelf life is only checked when you enter a goods receipt if the
    following prerequisites are met :-
    1.The minimum remaining shelf life is maintained in the material master
    record or in the purchase order. The minimum remaining shelf life is theminimum number of days for which the material must keep for the goods
    receipt to be accepted by the system.
    2.The shelf life expiration date check is active for the plant and
    movement type in Customizing for Inventory Management.In the
    transaction SPRO,if you check in SAP Reference IMG
    Material Management > Inventory management and Physical Inventory
    > Goods Receipt > Set Expiration date Check,the SLExp/prDt field
    is checked for plant and material movement
    Regards

  • Carryover of Expected Useful Life for an Asset

    When I create an asset in our system, in the first year carryover the system is not creating a count of 1 year and 2 months. Instead I receive 14 months in asset useful life. This example is based off an asset created on 11/1/10 with a carry forward to 2011. Anybody know why this is happening?

    Thanks for your reply. My question is not to get a list of assets which are fully depreciating this year. I want to know the end of useful life for certain assets that I will select. What you told, would show the assets expiring this year.
    Let me know if I am missing something.
    Keyur

  • End of Useful life for an asset

    Hello,
    Does anyone know if there is any standard report which states when the asset's useful life is going to end? Even if there is no standard report, does anyone know if this information is stored in any tables from which it can be extracted. Basically, my user has a requirement to know when a certain chunk of his assets are going to fully depreciate. I know this information is available in the asset explorer (comparision tab) but there are some 500 assets and it would be helpful if there is some sort of list available.
    Thanks for your help
    Best Regards
    Keyur

    Thanks for your reply. My question is not to get a list of assets which are fully depreciating this year. I want to know the end of useful life for certain assets that I will select. What you told, would show the assets expiring this year.
    Let me know if I am missing something.
    Keyur

  • MissingFieldException[ The following required field is missing from the lau

    Hi, I'm new to this forum so please put this thread in the right place if I have made a mistake.
    But here's my problem:
    I'm using jre 7 with the latest version.
    I downloaded and wanted to launch a Java based .jar game, which runs perfectly for the other users but my JRE gives the following error:
    Application error - unable to launch the application.
    MissingFieldException[ The following required field is missing from the launch file: <jnlp>]
         at com.sun.javaws.jnl.XMLFormat.parse(Unknown Source)
         at com.sun.javaws.jnl.LaunchDescFactory.buildDescriptor(Unknown Source)
         at com.sun.javaws.jnl.LaunchDescFactory.buildDescriptor(Unknown Source)
         at com.sun.javaws.jnl.LaunchDescFactory.buildDescriptor(Unknown Source)
         at com.sun.javaws.Main.launchApp(Unknown Source)
         at com.sun.javaws.Main.continueInSecureThread(Unknown Source)
         at com.sun.javaws.Main.access$000(Unknown Source)
         at com.sun.javaws.Main$1.run(Unknown Source)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
    On the forum where is the game developed i got the following answer:
    ''+it seems your OS/jre installation tries to start the jar as an applet which fails, because it's a regular application and not an applet. is there any way you can convince your jre to start LS as an application? i would like to give better/more detailed advice, but i'm not running windows, so i can't check for myself/try to work out a step-by-step guide.+ ''
    As I have browsed the internet for hours and haven't come up with a solution I'm asking for some help.

    That error seems to indicate that the JNLP file is broken because it is missing the starting starting <jnlp> XML tag; I'll take a guess and just say that it is completely empty. Since it works for other users, apparently somehow when you download it on your computer you end up with a broken file. No idea why, no way for me to know why either. I don't have access to your computer. All I can say is: try in another browser and if that doesn't work, try on another computer. If it works there, well then you may have to face the fact that your computer might need a clean install.
    And PS: this is a Java programming forum, not technical support for whatever game you want to play that just happens to use Java.

  • Using a field hierarchy for selecting checkboxes?

    I have a bunch of checkboxes in a PDF that are dynamically added to the PDF during its creation process. Each checkbox is a cell in a table, and I do not know the number of rows or columns that will be in the PDF beforehand. What we are trying to do is add a header row to the table that allows the users to select/unselect all the check boxes in a column at once. I figured I could use the field name hierarchy approach to select/unselect all the checkboxes as long as I named them appropriately but I appear to be missing something.
    Take for example this table (assume [] denotes where a checkbox will go):
    Title
    Category 1
    Category 2
    [check.global.category1]
    [check.global.category2]
    Some Product
    [check.category1.cell1]
    [check.category2.cell1]
    Another Product
    [check.category1.cell2]
    [check.category2.cell2]
    What I would like to do is add a JavaScript call so that when check.global.category1 is clicked I could add something like this to the click event:
    var field = getField("check.category1");
    field.checkThisBox() //or checkThisBox(false);
    And that would toggle all the check boxes in the Category 1 column. However, that does not appear to work. Is there another mechanism to do this, or some way I can loop over all the check boxes that belong to the same hierarchy? I know this approach works with buttons and text fields but checkboxes appear to be different.

    I found the answer. To get all the checkboxes use getArray() after calling getField.
    http://livedocs.adobe.com/acrobat_sdk/9.1/Acrobat9_1_HTMLHelp/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/w whelp.htm?context=Acrobat9_HTMLHelp&file=JS_API_AcroJS.88.744.html

Maybe you are looking for