Export versions without crop applied

Hi-
I am needing to quickly export my versions (~20 photos, 1 version each) without the crop applied.
I can export the masters but then I lose levels (and other) adjustments from the RAW. What I'd like to be able to do is:
On the Export Versions dialog window, [de]-select certain adjustments that should not be applied on the export. I think that would be a cool feature.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Scott

I believe you will find that you can select any cropped photo, click on the Crop tool, click outside the crop borders, which will remove the crop, lift adjustments and then click on all the other cropped photos and Stamp. This Stamp will remove only the crop. You can then Export, and the with all those still selected, use Edit to Undo the Stamp that had removed the crop.
Ernie

Similar Messages

  • Exporting Versions without Version # included in name

    Hi all,
    I am trialing 1.5 and would like to upload lores Jpegs of a single version of each of my master files to Photoshelter.
    Everything works well except that I don't want to include the version # in the file name.
    I have renamed the files from the original camera generated filename and when I choose Master Filename in the naming presets it reverts back to the original camera filename.
    Any ideas?
    Paul
    Dual 2 GHz Power PC G5   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   2 gig Ram

    Thanks for your comments Pierre, I was hoping to use the time savings available by uploading to Photoshelter directly from Aperture.
    The last sentence referred to file names that are changed once they are in Aperture seem to revert back to the original (camera generated name) when Master File name is chosen in the naming presets.
    cheers
    Dual 2 GHz Power PC G5   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   2 gig Ram

  • Export without crop

    What I would like is an 'export without crop' option. I crop the pictures I export for my clients. But for my own use in inDesign I want them full frame. I was discussing this with some of my collegues and they would love this feature as well, they said....

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    hsbn wrote:
    You can create virtual copy before doing the crop. That what I've done all the time.
    Exactly, and this is how to do it after the crop to clean up your history of cropping:
    Select the thumbs you have cropped and also want an uncropped version and add to a collection if they are in multiple folders
    Select all the thumbs in the collection
    Press ctr or cmd and ' (apostrophy) or from the menu: Photo > Make virtual copy
    Press R to crop and Reset in the crop panel.
    Assign a keyword or label to separate the cropped and uncropped versions if required
    You will now have two versions of each photo, cropped and uncropped.
    Rory

  • Is it possible to replace masters with versions without going through the process of exporting and importing?

    Is it possible to overwrite the master files with the versions without having to go through the entire process of exporting and importing back the images?
    Thnx in advance

    A small refinement if you shoot RAW. Remember, no RAW file can ever be edited or rewritten. Thus, in the old days, the flow was:
    RAW>TIFF/PSD and you ended up with two large files. (This is why some folks used to delete the RAW Masters.)
    With Aperture the flow is something like:
    RAW+Version(s) Only the Version is only 30 KB. (There is, of course, additional overhead of Thumbs and Previews, but, depending on your settings, this is only a fraction of the size of a TIFF or PSD.)
    You question goes right to the heart of the concept of a non-destructive workflow. With Aperture you always preserve your original Master file; the only things that are ever at risk are your edits (called Adjustments). Ironically, this is even more valuable if you shoot JPEG or TIFF as those files could be rewritten.)
    Aperture goes to great lengths to give you the best of both worlds; you always have the Master to revert to and your "edits" take up very little disk space. And you don't have to waste time trying to sync folders of RAW, TIFF, and JPEG. Similarly, you never have to worry about resizing images, changing color spaces, or any number of other things that get locked into an image file when you use a destructive workflow.
    Remember, Aperture will happily Export files in any format you may need. Export 'em, use 'em, delete 'em - your Masters are still safe in Aperture.
    DiploStrat

  • Save multiple HDR versions without re-aligning

    In Lightroom, I will select several images (an exposure bracket) and select Edit In -> Photoshop HDR Pro. It will take a few minutes, and then I can play with the HDR options and close the wizard which gives me a new photoshop layer that is the HDR image. I find myself often wanting to export the 32-bit version, as well as export a version that has an HDR compression applied. To do this, I have to repeat the entire process twice, which takes quite a bit of time. Is there anyway I can save out these two different versions without starting all the way back in Lightroom the second time?
    Thanks,
    David

    Any thoughts on this?

  • Control metadata at exported versions

    how to export versions with iptc annonations but without exif camera data.
    it’s only possible to choose between export with or without metadata, but not to control which metadata is included in the exported version.
    sometimes i prefer if clients don’t see my camera exif infos.
    hope there’s a solution in aperture. sure i could contoll it afterwards with other software, but it should be possible in aperture.

    Same problem here. In one project 4 out of 33 pictures were completely off the mark. The common factor seems to be that the corrupted images had been cropped, and Aperture messed up the area to crop at export time. Exporting them individually afterwards worked fine. Exporting two other projects with non-cropped images worked fine.
    As this is the kind of processing I intended to use Aperture for, it is very annoying to say the least. I was about to buy the non-trial version tomorrow, but I now hesitate a lot - especially as I have not got any answer to my question in http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1402056&tstart=0 , which potentially could have achieved similar things using AppleScript.
    Did anyone log a bug report for this yet?

  • How to export video without modification

    So it appears that the new iPhoto 9.5 modifies video files when exporting, even when you choose "original." I like to backup my original files without any modification. Images don't seem to be modified, but videos are; the timestamp changes and the size is smaller. Has anyone figured out an easy way to export/backup without modifying the original video files?
    I've tried going into the iPhoto library and just backing up manually from there, but Apple has once again modified the file structure of the library so it's hard to figure out if you're getting all the files, or even what date you're getting. It seems to separate it by month and date of import, but not the date the actual image/video was taken.
    I liked the old version where you just select a range of images/videos in iPhoto and export the originals to a backup drive without any modification.
    Here's a screenshot of how it organizes the files in the library. Kind of a mess.

    With past versions, when you exported as "original," it wasn't actually exporting a new file; it was copying the original file to a new location. So you were getting a bit-for-bit copy of the original. It appears to still do that with images—the copied file has the same datestamp and size as the original. By "datestamp" I mean the date you see on the file in Finder, not the embedded Exif info.
    But with videos, the new version is modifying the original, making it a smaller file size, and changing the file's datestamp. If I choose "original," I should be getting a direct copy of the original, but I'm not. Instead I'm getting a modified version of it. And given the filesize change, I'm assuming it's a compressed version.
    I know direct access to the library isn't supported. It's the Apple way to keep stuff like that hidden. But in the past, if I wanted to, I could view package contents and get to files I needed much more easily than the new version allows.
    I'm just trying to find an easy way to back up the original video file, not a modified version of it.

  • How can I resize a photo in iPhoto without cropping it?

    I am taking pictures on my iphone 4s and using iphoto to edit them on macbook pro.  I need to upload these photos at a size much smaller than what i am able to take with my phone.  The only way I see to adjust the size of a photo in iphoto is to crop it.  How can I resize without cropping?
    Thank you

    It's an option in the Export menu.
    File -> Export and under the Size option you can choose the maximum you prefer. Export that and upload from the desktop.

  • Error: exporting versions is done using RAW

    Hi,
    I'm having a strange problem which I couldn't find in the different communities.
    My workflow: As usual, I'm importing my pictures in RAW and process it in Aperture (3.1.2). Now, I wanted to export the pictures in JPEG. To do so, I right-clicked on the desired project, chose "Export --> Versions", and in the export presets "JPG - Original size".
    The export was working fine (the folders were created), but the pictures exported were no JPEG but RAW (file format CR2, I have a Canon 500D), and - hardly surprising - without any of my my adjustments. The result is the same whether I'm exporting individual pictures or whole projects, and even changing the presets for the export (e.g. TIFF) doesn't change anything; Aperture insists on RAW being the file format of the exported pictures.
    And just to answer the most likely question: Yes, I've chosen "Export --> Versions" and not "Export --> Masters".  :-)
    Anyone has an idea what I've done wrong?
    Kind regards
    Dirk

    Hi Kirby, hi Ernie,
    thanks for your help... after a lot of trying, I found at least the reason for the error.  :-)
    The Aperture library is situated on a NAS, and the image files are stored within the library (that was the import setting as well). It seems that Aperture has got some troubles with that situation.  In the browser, the badge "the referenced image master is offline" is displayed for all the images. Strange enough, because all the image masters are stored in the library (the NAS is online as well), and I can access the library.
    It seems that with this status, Aperture can't export properly. After some trying found out that I found out that if duplicate the version of the image, Aperture doesn't think any more that the referenced image master is offline. When I export this version, everything is fine.
    I don't really understand what's going on, but the question has shifted somehow - no export problem any more, but "How can I import images to a Aperture library situated on a NAS without creating the problem mentioned above".
    Dirk
    PS:
    English is not my first language, so I apologize for any errors.

  • How do I resizie a photo without Cropping

    Hi All,
    Just download the 30 day trial of Aperture 2 to test it out. Recently new into photography, progressing on past point and click.
    Want to post some photo's on a website to get feedback but they ask for photo's no bigger than 600x600 pxls.
    If I have shot at 6mp and I am over 2000x2000pxls can I shrink the pick to 600 or below without cropping so I can get advise on the complete picture? If yes how do I do it.
    Thanking you in advance.
    Matt

    Ernie is exactly right. Aperture always keeps your original high-res file untouched. You get a specific size by exporting a JPG or TIF. Along those line, I use the Zenfolio website for photos I shoot for clients. There is an Aperture plug-in for Zenfolio, which means I can export directly from Aperture to my Zenfolio website. No more making a folder of images on my desktop, uploading them and then deleting the folder. The photos go straight from Aperture to Zenfolio. There are export plug-ins for other photo websites as well, such as Flickr. Here is a link for more plug-in details:
    http://www.apple.com/aperture/resources/plugins.html#export

  • Does Export Version reduces image quality?

    Hi,
    I got smaller file size when I "export version" at "original size". My master was jpeg of 5.1MB and I exported in jpeg format, I got 3.6MB. If I "export master", I do get 5.1MB. What does Aperture do to the jpeg image that reduces the file size?
    Then I played around with "image quality", which is 10 by default. If I set it to 11, I got a file of 4.1 MB, still smaller than the original 5.1MB. Set it to 12 I got a file of 10.4MB. I am kind of confused. I guess the "image quality" relates to degree of jpeg compression, and a 12 setting means that Aperture compresses the jpeg image at a lower compression ratio than my camera? Does Aperture uncompress jpeg image and re-compress it when "export version"?
    The bottom line is, how do I preserve image quality after adjustments? In other words, I would like to export at the same image quality as my original photo, or as close as possible (I assume Aperture reduces jpeg image quality a bit every time I apply adjustments to the image via export). Thanks much for your time.

    Wanderzhuanyou wrote:
    2) When I make adjustments in Aperture I actually work on the image Aperture produces out of the master file - which should be about 73MB in my computer memory as the size of the image is 2848 x 4272 and Aperture works in 16 bit.
    Internally, Core Image (which Aperture uses) actually works in 32-bit, but your basic idea is right.
    3) When I export, Apertures compresses this 73MB image (assume adjustments don't make much difference to the image size) to a jpeg file.
    First the image will be reduced to the bit depth of your export preset. Image adjustments will make quite a difference to the final file size because areas of high definition detail and a large tonal range will both increase the file size for a given compression setting. So any sharpening, for example, will increase the file size.
    As a test, export an image with no sharpening applied, then add some edge sharpening and export it again. You should see a noticeable difference in file sizes.
    Correct?
    Pretty much.
    Ian

  • Cannot Export Versions with Aperture 3.3

    After upgrading to Aperture 3.3, I lost the ability to Export Versions of my files. Exporting Originals works just fine, but I need to I export jpegs for my work. What I end up getting now is a jpg with a totally black image. The metadata is intact and the size and jpeg format are correct, but the image is just black. I have already tried Repairing Permissions and Repairing the Database in Aperture with no change. I have not yet tried "Rebuild Database" but I do not think that is the problem because I am able to Export images from my Aperture Library files using iPhoto without a problem. Please help.

    I am exporting with a preset that I have set up. Here are the settings:
    Image Format: JPEG
    Image Quality: 10
    Size To: Fit Within (Pixels) Width 1024 Height 683
    DPI: 132
    (No Gamma Adjust)
    Color Profile: Use Source Profile
    (Black Pint Compensation NOT CHECKED)
    (Show Watermark NOT CHECKED)
    Okay, the good news is that I tried other settings and it worked. Tiff works just fine and exporting the preset jpeg setting (full size, half size) works just fine. I then deleted the export setting mentioned above and created a new one, but it does not work.
    So, I am almost there. I appreciate your suggestions so far as some of them worked. Any more ideas?

  • Database version and patchset applied from the operating system level in so

    How to find out the database version and patchset applied from the operating system level in solaris?

    [oracle@rac1 udump]$ cd $ORACLE_HOME/OPatch/
    [oracle@rac1 OPatch]$ pwd
    /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/OPatch
    [oracle@rac1 OPatch]$ export ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1
    [oracle@rac1 OPatch]$ ./opatch lsinventory
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.1.0
    Oracle interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.1.0
    Copyright (c) 2005, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved..
    Oracle Home : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1
    Central Inventory : /u01/app/oracle/oraInventory
    from : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI location : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2
    Edited by: rajeysh on Jul 31, 2010 1:19 AM

  • Adjustment Brush, External Editor and Export Version

    hello, I am considering switching from lightroom to Aperture but I am having a major issue:
    I am working on .DNG files. I apply all the adjustments that I need, then either send the image to PSCS4 (I tried both tiff and PSD), or export it through the export version command. In both cases all adjustments are applied BUT the brushes. Thy just vanish. When I edit with PSCS4 this appears clearly in aperture browser, because I can see the edited DNG having the adjustment brushes, whereas the .tiff or .psd that was sent to PS does not...
    Any clues? Many thanks
    PS: I am using aperture 3.0.2 and macosx 10.6.3

    Go through the Apple-recommended trouble-shooting steps.  At the least, run "repair database".  My guess is that you'll end up having to delete your user prefs as well.
    Details are on this Apple Aperture support page.

  • How to export versions, not masters

    I imported 700 photos from an SD card to Aperture then selected them all and had Aperture optimize them, which it did very well. I now have 1400 files -- one master and one version for each photo. I would like to export only the optimized photos, so I can send them to the friend who traveled with me. Is there some way that I can select all the files with "version" in their name other than tediously clicking on each file name?

    Susan, it sounds like you may need to change your preferences so that new versions are NOT created when you make an adjustment.
    Now that is the future sorted, to select just the versions with adjustments applied *** the rule adjustments
    and then select are applied, this will filter your images so that only the images with an adjustment are shown.
    Alternatively you could also filter based on the text "version" this would then also give you the images you are after.
    Let us know how you go
    Tony

Maybe you are looking for

  • Labview display problem

    Hello, The Labview display went crazy one day. When I scroll the vertical scroll bar of the front panel, only the left part (about 3/4 of the width of the screen) of the front panel goes up or down as it should, while the right part (about 1/4 of the

  • One particular website that won't load on my MacBook Pro

    I have been trying to access a website that continually fails to load (in most cases, described below) on my MacBook Pro in Safari, Google Chrome and Firefox. The site: http://www.crestedbuttemusicfestival.com My Mac won't open this site at any time

  • Transfer address book to new MacBook Air

    Help. Trying to transfer Address Book 6 data from a target disk mode MacBook Pro to new MacBook Air running Mountain Lion. Can you help?

  • Screen flashes back to home screen for no apparent reason IOS 7.0.3

    When reading email or web pages, both my iPad 1 and iPad 2 flash back to the home page without warning. There has also been a considerable slowdown with the performance since the IOS 7.0.3 update. Any others have any ideas or solutions?

  • 8520 Email Set up problems

    Hello, I have an 8520 curve which I purchased and used in the UK with the Orange network before moving back to Canada and getting a package with Fido. Everything is working fine with it except I am unable to set up my email accounts. From the email s