Exporting jpg no longer passes on rating

Hi!
Previously, when I exported RAW photos to jpg via Bridge / Adobe Camera Raw, whatever star rating I had applied to the RAW file would automatically be passed on to the exported jpg file as well.
Now, with Bridge CC, the exported jpg gets no rating at all.
This really messes up my workflow (I need to identify the best pictures after exporting them too), so I am wondering if it's possible to make Bridge / Camera Raw give the exported jpg the same rating as the RAW file somehow, as before?
Thanks for any help!

Of course the solution appeard in a "similar thread" once I posted:
In the Save options dialog, under Format --> Metadata, I am able to select "All" metadata to follow through to the jpg, and thus I also get the star rating.

Similar Messages

  • How do I export jpgs as tifs with the original resolution ?

    Hi,
    I am very new to Lightroom 5 (I only installed it today (on Windows 8.1) :-)) but I have read Victoria Bampton's Quick Start Guide and have read a number of forum posts over the last few weeks to get an idea about how the program generally works.
    I am embarking on a project to scan and archive my family's photos and videos, and I will be using Lightroom to manage the collection.  To start the project, I have just imported over 10,000 digital photos taken by a variety of cameras (36 of them, according to Lightroom !)  over the last 12 years or so into a new Lightroom catalogue.   These are all currently JPEG files, but I want to keep TIFF files in the collection because my research has led me to the conclusion that TIFF is a better long-term archival format.
    I started by doing an Export of a small number of photos to save the .jpg files as .tif files, but when reviewing the results, I noticed that the image's resolution was changed during the export.  For example, one original jpg is only 96ppi but the exported tif is 240ppi.  Another jpg is 180ppi and the tif is 240ppi.  At least, that's what the metadata seems to be telling me (via the Details tab of the Properties dialog in Windows), so I assume it's true...
    I understand that the 240ppi that I am seeing in the .tif file metadata was specified in the Image Sizing section of the Export dialog, so that's not the issue.  
    I would prefer it if the .tif file has the exact same resolution (ppi) as the original .jpg, but I am unable to work out how to do it.   It would be great if the resolution setting in the Export dialog was controlled by the Resize to Fit checkbox, like the other settings in the section, but it doesn't appear to be (it's enabled even if the Resize to Fit checkbox is unticked).
    I then thought about using the Library Filters to filter by the Horizontal Resolution metadata, so that I could select all the photos with the same resolution and export just those with the Resolution setting in the Export dialog set to the right number, and then repeat that process for each different group of original photos with a different resolution.  Unfortunately, I have not been able to work out how to filter by the horizontal resolution metadata field - it doesn't seem to be available in the dropdown list of fields shown when I click on the up-down arrow next to the "Date" or "Camera" (etc.) columns in the Library Filter pane.
    Finally, here's my question (or three):  
    Is there a way to export .jpgs to .tif files while keeping the original resolution ?  
    Alternatively, is there a way to select groups of photos by their horizontal or vertical resolution (so just those photos could be exported in a group with the right resolution specified) ?
    Or is there any other way to do what I want (convert jpg to tif with the same resolution and keeping all the metadata) ?
    Thanks for reading all the way through to the end.
    John.

    These are all currently JPEG files, but I want to keep TIFF files in the collection because my research has led me to the conclusion that TIFF is a better long-term archival format.
    I'm not sure why you say this. In terms of long-term archival format, I think the two are equal, I am not aware of other reasons to do this, and thus in my opinion, the task of globally turning all your JPGs into TIFFs seems unnecessary. You don't gain anything by doing this. But you sure will spend a lot of time and take up a lot of disk space doing this.
    I would prefer it if the .tif file has the exact same resolution (ppi) as the original .jpg, but I am unable to work out how to do it.
    Again, I think you have embarked upon an unnecessary task. The ppi in the file is essentially meaningless. A photo that has (for example) 3000x2000 pixels saved at 240 ppi is the exact same photo as the same photo 3000x2000 saved at 180ppi, not a single pixel has changed. You are placing a meaning and importance to this ppi number that just doesn't exist.
    To answer your questions at the bottom, I would advise you to not do the things you are talking about, it seems to me that you have greatly misunderstood things.

  • Why do exported JPGs appear darker than the processed RAW in the LR3 Development module?

    I have scoured the forums with this question, and I have seen plenty of suggestions about color space and monitor calibration.  However, I never seem to find that the issue gets resolved in the forums.
    I am using Lightroom 3, and I am exporting to JPG using sRGB.  I have noticed that the JPGs appear darker and the prints are also darker.  I am using the same monitor to process in LR and to view the exported JPG.  Why don't the images look the same, or at least similar?  The difference is pretty huge.

    rasu wrote:
    … What do you mean by export in an mp4 wrapper? Do you mean export it as an mp4 format instead of H264?? …
    no, exactly I did NOT meant that.
    that's why I phrased 'wrapper':
    a bit confusing, but there's mpeg4, the codec, and there's mp4 the wrapper or media-container:
    • use your .mov you have already exported, which has the right colors.
    • download/install the free tool Mpeg Streamclip
    • open your mov, go straight to 'save as' and choose from drop down mp4
    • save and upload that mp4 for comparison to Vimeo
    • (tell us, wether you notice any difference, as said, just an assumption)
    What will that do?
    your h264 encoded material is actually in a .mov-wrapper
    Streamclip unwraps that, and puts it into a .mp4-wrapper
    this does NOT encode/transcode/affect your h264 material!
    it just changes the box, not the chocolate!
    What's NOT working is changing the suffix in a Finder operation - that does NOT affect the 'atoms' of the wrapper = a re-named mp4 will be 'noticed' by many programs/players as a mov anyhow! You HAVE to go the 'long' way with Streamclip - due to the simple re-packing operation, that process needs only seconds
    I'm using this process to 'convert' my FCPX/iMovie .mov-exports to a readable format for my son's Playstation3 ... mov is a nogo, re-named suffix is a nogo. only re-wrapping to .mp4 works. excellent.
    ... but, as mentioned, I do care very little about gamma and luma as an hobbyist, my 'products' are under-exposured and veeery colorful anyhow

  • I have a problem with itunes when I sync the saved music and want to sync my iphone 5 ios 7.0.6 no longer passes the music thing is that just stays on "waiting for sync" and not worry please help are more than 400 songs that do not want to hear who are wi

    I have a problem with itunes when I sync the saved music and want to sync my iphone 5 ios 7.0.6 no longer passes the music thing is that just stays on "waiting for sync" and not worry please help are more than 400 songs that do not want to hear who are wi

    Plawexki wrote:
    ...  do you know if the contacts, photos, messages etc will be wiped?
    Yes... Everything will be Wiped and Replaced with what is currently on Your Mac.
    SYNCING with iTunes
    See here  >  http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1386
    From Here  >  http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/syncing/
    You may find this information of interest...
    Have a read here...
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/18409815?ac_cid=ha
    And See Here...
    How to Use Multiple iDevices with One Computer

  • Export jpgs from final cut pro x

    How do I now export jpgs from my final cut pro x? 
    They seemed to have changed it in the new version.

    From the Share popup select Add Destinations. You see it in the Destinations preferences.

  • Script for moving playhead to last frame, then exporting jpg?

    Hi,
    I have a lot of Flash files for which I need to export jpgs of their last frame. Could a kind soul out there guide me on how to write a command for moving the timeline's playhead to the last frame, then exporting a jpg (at Full Document Size, 72 dpi, 96% quality)?
    A million thanks,
    Kevin

    private function snapshotLastFrame():void
    gotoAndStop( this.totalFrames );
    _bitmapData                         = new BitmapData( stage.stageWidth, stage.stageHeight );
    _bitmap                              = new Bitmap( _bitmapData );
    _bitmapData.draw ( stage );
    saveImageJPG( _bitmapData, "test.jpg", 96 );
    public function saveImageJPG( bitmapData:BitmapData, fileName:String, quality:int ):void {
                this.jpgEncoder = new JPGEncoder( quality );
                this.fileReference = new FileReference();
                this.fileReference.save( this.jpgEncoder.encode( bitmapData ), fileName + ".jpg" );
    Keep in mind that you need a few extra libraries to be able to create a jpeg.. (AS3CoreLib) can be found at googleCode.

  • Illustrator CS6 - Export jpg without adding artboard to name

    Is there a way in Illustrator CS6 to export as jpg with Use Artboard check to not have illustrator add the name of the artboard to your file name?
    Example -
    File name "redboat.ai"
    Export jpg "redboat.jpg" with Use Artboard option selected
    File name becomes "redboat-01.jpg"
    This is not a huge problem when I only have 1 or two files but when I have to rename 100+ file names it can be a pain.
    I do understand that I can batch rename in Bridge but it would be nice if I could have these files saved without the artboard name on them.
    Any help appreciated.

    Export to .jog with use artbaords, needs to add to the name, so shen you export imaegs with multiple artbaords you do not have reapeated names.
    You can do a save for web, and turn on clip to artboard and you will get the filename you need. Record an action to save the file to your desktop, and you will save even more time running this as a batch command on a folder of images.

  • Export jpg to new folder just copy unmodified pics

    Is there a way to export jpg files to a new folder and let lightroom process only the modified pictures and leave others untouched. Here is a short example what I mean by that:
    1. I take 100 photos
    2. I apply edits to 50 of the photos, the other 50 look fine as is.
    3. I want to export all the photos to a new folder with new names based  on the event.
    4. Of course my altered JPEGs will need to be reprocessed and resaved  with varying degrees of JPEG compression.
    5. But the photos that were not  altered I’d simply like copied to the new folder with in sequence  filenames
    Is there a way to do that with lightroom?

    Lightroom cannot do it automatically, I mean, deciding which one to export as a new recomressed JPEG and which one to just copy.
    So, you'll have to separate the two groups manually and perform two separate exports.
    1. Use the Library filter to separate by "Develop settings": Untouched JPEGS will be in the "Default" group, while edited jpegs will either be in custom or a develop preset.
    2. Export edited with the jpeg settings you need.
    3. Export unedited as "original".

  • Digital photo professional - export JPG from RAW

    Hello!
    i have a problem with program Digital photo professional, when i want export images from RAW format to JPG.
    The problem is, that quality of image is much more worse, then in RAW format in DPP. JPG looks blurred and fuzzy.
    IMAGE LINK:
    Please check image, on the left side is print screen from RAW in DPP, on the right is exported JPG from DPP.
    I want export JPG with the same quality as i see in RAW
    Is there anybody to help me?
    Thanks a lot.
    Vit

    1. open *.CR2 (raw file) in DPP
    2.file/convert and save
    3.type of file - EXif JPEG (JPG, JPEG)
    4.image quality 10
    5.output resolution 350dpi
    6.check -  embed icc profile in image
    There are not another settings, so i dont know, why has exported JPG so bad quality...
    When i open *.CR2 file in PS5, i see the same bad quality as exported JPG from DPP, but i read, that PS5, cannot
    open CR2 file in best quality, because PS5 doesnt have all function, that have DPP.
    I tested it on two PC, so problem is not only on my PC...
    Thanks.

  • How to find the original RAW file # from a Lightroom exported JPG?

    Hello, this is in regards to a Lightroom 3.5 exported JPG. This was a year ago when I had been told it was best to export files with simple renumbering of them from 1 to x... instead of retaining the original RAW 4-digit file name.
    I've currently lost the original files, and need to do a search for them via these 4 digits to see if I have them tucked away in any of my drives. I downloaded a metadata explorer, and it's telling me all the lightroom editing information, and everything else, but somehow does not have the simplest of information — that 4 digit original file name.
    Am I grasping at straws or is there likely to be any way to find this information out? I don't work with metadata, so there wouldn't have been any customizations to how Lightroom configures this....hoping that's in my favor. Any help is much appreciated!!!!

    A note about security (context: downloaded apps & plugins...).
    Anatomy of a URL:
    protocol://stuff.stuff.stuff.domain.domain-suffix/stuff/stuff?stuff=stuff
    None of this stuff matters much except:
    domain.domain-suffix (and protocol, to some extent).
    So if you download something from:
    http://ignafradifcawhatyousay.toolonganyway.my.server.com/gogafnoics...
    It's coming from server.com using http (web) protocol.
    But, if you download it from:
    http://my.server.com.badguy.tv/...
    It's coming from badguy.tv, NOT server.com, so if you want it from server.com - danger will robins...
    And, if you download from
    http://216.195.245.134/my.server.com
    It's coming from an unregistered internet address (216.195.245.134) - again: danger...
    (4 groups of up-to-3 digits separated by dots is the format for a literal internet (IP) address, instead of domain-name...)
    Summary: if you learn the anatomy of a URL, and pay attention to the URL's you are clicking on, or entering directly, you can take more responsibility for security, and assure (to a greater extent) you don't download from an unfriendly source.
    Disclaimer: I accept no legal responsibility for anything that happens as a result of anything written above...
    Rob

  • Preserving 16x9 format when exporting jpg

    Hi. I am exporting from FCE, still images from a sequence using File/Export/Quicktime conversion and still image or image sequence settings. The project is from HDV and is in widescreen but the exported jpg images are 'tall and thin', indicating it has somehow converted from 16x9. I cannot find any reference to this in the FCE manual. Can you help? (I am UK based, using PAL and capturing the HDV footage using Easy Setup setting HDV-Apple Intermediate Codec 1080i50) - Thanks, Max

    Why are you exporting image sequences? What are you trying to do? HDV 1080 material is normally squeezed for compression from 1920 to 1440. That's the way the HDV 1080 format is designed so that's what you get when you export an image sequence. If you're going back to video this is the best way to leave your material as it's the least manipulated that way. If you're doing something else then you have to readjust the images.

  • Exporting JPGs with their Original Filename

    So, I have these sets of cropping documents with images laid out in them taking up the entire frame, no text or anything else. At the end of the day, I need to export the crops with the original JPGs' naming convention. Right now, I am going through, exporting and then renaming. Sometimes I get sequential images with the same prefix in the same document which is super easy. However, other times there are images with different prefixes, a couple image numbers missing, or even the sequence being out of order. I was wondering if there was a way(maybe a script) out there that would allow me to export JPGs of each page while using the placed JPG's filename. So if page 1 had a JPG named image_1 and page 2 had a JPG named image_4, when I export them, I'd end up with two files, image_1 and image_4.
    It might sound silly, but it would be super helpful when exporting documents with 30+ images, sometimes laid out in the incorrect order or with different prefixes. Any one have any ideas? Or even if it would be possible?

    InDesign Page Exporter Utility Script | RR Donnelley
    Maybe this script?

  • Aperture 3 export jpg

    Hi, I'm devastated !!! I noticed that export jpg quality for web gallery is awful with Aperture 3.0.2 even by choosing the better quality. I can compare to Aperture 2 and it's not really the same quality. Did you saw that ? I Hope this will be fixed in a next update because my website is really ugly now.
    Very disapointed by the new version...

    I came home and tried confirming in Aperture at 100%, prior the image was shrunk 33% to fit my screen.
    Clearly at 100% I can see in Aperture the star trails colors do degrade when applied edge sharpen, just sharpen adds crispness but barely affects color - if at all.
    100% No sharpen PP:
    http://lh4.ggpht.com/_FqTNmgNQHz8/TFDIcF2jtGI/AAAAAAAAKdg/dCgTBBm8oN0/Jul%2016%2 0tiff%20startrails%20c%20-%20Version%202%20no%20PP.jpg
    100% Just sharpen PP, colors still present, I like the added crispness of the star trails:
    http://lh5.ggpht.com/FqTNmgNQHz8/TFDIcnmmII/AAAAAAAAKdk/jCgn8-ws2mE/Jul%2016%20tiff%20startrails%20c%20-%20Version%202% 20sharpen%20PP.jpg
    100% sharpen and edge sharpen PP, colors very much affected.
    Playing with the edge sharpen controls (intensity, edges, falloff) showed varying degrees of color degradation, I consider any not acceptable so won't use edge sharpen PP for star trails.
    http://lh4.ggpht.com/_FqTNmgNQHz8/TFDIdXHKYGI/AAAAAAAAKdo/TOOPRbODd00/Jul%2016%2 0tiff%20startrails%20c%20-%20Version%202%20sharpenand%20Edge%20PP.jpg
    Should edge sharpen be doing this?
    I don't know, hard to say.
    But at least now I'm WYSIWYG (been so many years since I've typed that), seeing Aperture is same as export.
    Teaches me to always confirm at 100% any PP.

  • Lightroom 3 exporting issue: exported JPGs come out with much more noise than original edited files

    Hi all,
    My first post here so nice to meet everyone. I've been having some issues with exporting in Lightroom recently. It appeared to happen quite out of the blue. Sometimes when I export my edited .cr2 files as jpgs (in srgb), at a good quality (no less than 85), some of resulting jpgs seem to have exposure higher and/or a horribly large increase in the amount of visable noise. It seems many of the photos which this occurs in have pretty high settings for fill light, but even still, the noise is not visable in lightroom while editing the metadata linked .cr2.
    I thought it might be the problem that I'm viewing the final exported jpgs in preview, but I also tried adding them back into the catalog and they look just as off. I just upgraded to 3.3, but it seems to be having the same issue. If anyone can please help, it would be greatly appreciated!
    Thanks

    No sharpening at all during my export, Ian. Sometimes I sharpen for screen at a standard strength, but I turned it off when I started seeing the extra artifacts but the results of the exports remains basically the same with or without sharpening.
    However when I import it seems my photos already have some sharpening on them in the develop module. The settings there are sharpening = 25, radius = 1, Detail = 25, masking = 0. I honestly rarely mess with the sharpening, so I guess I skipped over those settings during the countless hours I have worked with LR! But I assume those are normal post import numbers, correct? I never apply development settings during import, that's why I say that. Thanks for keeping up the conversation and brainstorming Ian! Anyone else also free to chime in.

  • Crs:AlreadyApplied=False in exported jpg

    Hi,
    I import RAW files (Canon CR2 from EOS40D) in PE 7 and launch
    ACR from the organizer in order to do things like changing exposure
    and cropping.
    After this, I want to send selected images to a printing house.
    So I proceed to "export as new files" and save as JPG in a new
    output directory.
    This usually works well. However, the last printing house I used returned
    prints that were badly cropped, overexposed and with an awful white
    balance.
    The affected prints are exaclty those that I have made manual adjustments on
    with ACR. And the faults are consistent with having my changes (crops and
    exposure) applied twice.
    The JPGs look good in all viewers, including the one the printing house
    uses to preview images before processing. But when it's processed by
    their printing sw, the images are screwed up.
    I examined the files, and to my astonishment, the exported JPG files had
    (quite unnecessary) crs: metadata in them, that described my corrections
    to the raw file. And what's probably worse, the flag crs:AlreadyApplied
    was set to "False".
    My guess is that the new printing house's software has interpreted the
    metadata information and, becuase of the mentioned flag,  applied
    my original corrections once more.
    My question is if this behavior is intended? I suppose not...
    If not, is there a patch that fixes it?
    Is it fixed in more recent versions of PE?
    Is there a workaraound so I get rid off metadata in the exported files?
    I can't find a setting in PE that does it. Right now, I run all exported files
    through ExifTool to get rid of all metadata, but I don't like this extra step.
    Jonas

    What does "id" command indicate on the unix prompt?
    Also, what permissions do you have on the file: /rac_cluster/oracle/product/10.2.0/crs/oui/instImages/bg.jpg?

Maybe you are looking for