F-47 Not Calculating Wh Tax
Hi Gurus,
I've decided to create this discussion because I couldn't find my solution as in previous thread :
F-47 not calculating Withholding Tax
I want to create posting with F-47 so that when I post with F-48 Withholding taxes will be deducted from the down payment.
Below are the configuration in the system :
1. Wh tax is defined as invoice only (not at payment).
2. Extended wh tax is active and already assigned to company code with validity period still active
3. Field status variant in OB41 for posting key 29, 39, 31, for taxes wh tax code and wh amount are opt. entry
4. Field status variant in OB14 for field status group G026, G067, and those related to my recon account for wh tx code and wh amount are opt. entry
When I post with normal invoice FB60, the wh tax is calculated, but when using DP request or special gl down payment, the wh tax is not calculated, SAP gives message "Withholding tax information is missing from the line item.
I have also check and apply solution in notes 1626838 - WT pop up not appear, but all of them is not solving my issue.
I need to activate withholding tax with spc gl, Is there any steps that I missing ?
Thank you.
Hi
Please see below path for config
Defined Tax type
Tax code for Payment tax type
assign to company code
Assoign GL code for both Invoice and payment Withholding tax .
many Thanks
Similar Messages
-
Secondary Higher Education Cess is not calculated in Tax Amount in MIRO
Hi,
I am facing a problem with SHECess which is implemented in recent budget changes in INDIA through SAP Notes.My problem is that when I made PO all duties and other taxes are calculated and showing correctly in PO as well as in Print Preview in PO.
But when I am trying to post the MIRO the system is not taking in to account the SHECess and also SHECess on CST.I checked several times but the results is the same.This is happening only for Depot Purchases for goods procured locally.
Plz help me if any one encounters this situation and give me the solution as early as possible becz it is utmost very urgent.Hi,
Check condition type for Secondary education cess is there in following path where you specify which condition type is used for which sort of tax, if not add with tax procedure
SPRO --> Logistics general > tax on Goods Movements> India > Classify Condition>Condition-Based Excise Determination Types
Also check TAX Procedure in t.code: OBYZ & see condition type for Secondary education cess is there with all condition types and all are placed with a logic to calculate taxes with total price.
Regards,
Biju K -
BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST not calculating TAX
Hi,
I am using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for posting the FI document for RC type. I tried posting it normally and it posted correctly. But when i give some ACCOUNT TAX information, it is not calculating.
Here is how I am filling the details.
Header:
BUS_ACT = RFBU.
USERNAME = SY_UNAME.
HEADER_TEXT = TEXT.
COMP_CODE = BUKRS.
DOC_DATE = 12/12/2011
PSTNG_DATE = 12/05/2011.
FIS_PERIOD = 00
REF_DOC_NO = 9700000036.
AC_DOC_NO = 9700000036.
Account GL Table:.
ITEMNO_ACC = 10.
GL_ACCOUNT = 412010.
DOC_TYPE = RC.
COMP_CODE = RECN.
FIS_PERIOD = 00.
PSTNG_DATE = 12/05/2011
TAX_CODE = TN
TAXJURCODE = TN3707600
COST CENTER = 107
Account Receivable:
ITEMNO_ACC = 20.
CUSTOMER = 1126045
COMP_CODE = RECN
BLINE_DATE = 12/12/2011.
PYMT_METH = B
CURRENCY AMOUNT : 2 LINE ITEMS
1ST LINE ITEM
ITEMNO_ACC = 10
CURRENCY = USD
AMT_DOCCUR = 500.00-
DISC_BASE = 500.00-.
2ND LINE ITEM
ITEMNO_ACC = 20
CURRENCY = USD
AMT_DOCCUR = 500.00
AMT_BASE = 500.00.
I did not enter the account tax table as I am not sure how to enter the date. But I know that the tax rate is 9.25% and for 500 the tax would be 42.33. I need to make sure that the BAPI posts the document as it posts from FB01 when we check the check box 'calculate tax'. Right now, with these details it is posting the data but not calculating the tax.
Please help.
Regards
Guru
Edited by: GuruCharan on Dec 15, 2011 6:28 PMRaymond,
Thanks for the reply. I did read the notes you have suggested. They are quite informative but unfortunately -
Note 367175 is related to the other BAPI`s. My issue is with the BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.
Note 487064 is related to the error when the tax amount is greater than the base amount.
Since I am using the Acc document post BAPI, please help me understand how to fill in the data for ACCOUNT TAX table or post the document from the BAPI along with the tax as it does in FB01.
Thanks Again,
Regards,
Guru. -
Extended Withholding Tax not calculating
Hi
We are in ECC 6. In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60. It works perfectly without any problem. It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all. All settings are as similar as development system. Vendor master record also similar as development. The document entered for testing is same as development.
Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system? Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
You suggestion is most impartant.
Thanks
VenkatDear Venkatasubramanya,
Check the following Master data in your Test System......
1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
Best Regards -
Not calculating tax in invoice!
Dear friends,
I have created invoice, but it is not calculating the tax. What could be the possible reason and what could be the solution? What is the tax procedure used in this case?Hi tasleemarif,
first of all check whether you have assigned a tax code to your PO in the invoice tab in item details screen,if it is being already done check whether that tax code has been properly maintained in the FTXP tcode,again check while doing the MIRO proper tax code is selected in the TAX tab.Also dont forget to check the calculate tax check.hope,this will help you out.
regards,
ASHISH. -
Hi freinds,
Whenever i am trying to give tax code in invoice, it is not calculating the tax and is giving a message "Customization for SWI1 j_1iindcus missing in the table" where SWI1 is my company code. Can anybody tell what the problem is and how to rectify it?
ThanxHi,
this amy be the case:- Go to IMG -> Logistics - General->Tax on Goods Movements-> India-> Basic Settings-> Determination of Excise Duty-> Condition-Based Excise Determination-> Assign Tax Code to Company Codes
and check do tax codes been assigned to company codes.
Rgds
S -
Income tax is not calculated After Total Income
Dear All,
I am running my payroll but my Income tax is not calculating properly because when am seeing my log then i find my total income is calculated properly but after that my STANDARD DEDUCTION is not been happening according to the rule if the employe is men it should be deducted 150,000 but it's not happenings . In payroll log where i can see the this (STANDARD DEDUCTION)amount because am not able to find how much deduction is happenings.My employe joining date is 01.05.2009
I am giving my salary components.
Basic-19500
HRA-13650
Performance-15000
LIC(IT0586 80C)-35215
Tution Fee(IT0586 80 C)-16800
Calculated PF-2340
CAlcualtion is done on the basis of 11 month
Gross Salary 529,650.00
Exemption U/S 10 107,250.00 (HRA Annual Ex)
Balance 422,400.00
Incm under Hd Salary 422,400.00
Gross Tot Income 422,400.00
Agg of Chapter VI 77,755.00
Total Income 344,650.00 (Till Here Every thng is fine From the next level am not able to identify how much and which basis MY Standard deduction is calculated)
Tax on total Income 52,395.00
Tax payable and surcharg 53,967.00
Income Tax 4,906.00
Kindly help me to resolve this issue am not a functional guy.
Thanks
SandeepDear Siknder ,
I alredy check in it0002 it male.
I want to know how should i check in my payroll log what calculation is happening after my total income get.
And also how i can identify which finacial year calculation is been performed. -
Hi,
We have scenario like this
Currently we are using 4 tax codes with different combination like V1- Excise + L-VAT 4%, V2- Nil Excise+4% L-VAT, V3 u2013 Excise + C-VAT 12.5% & V4 u2013 Nil Excise+ C-VAT 12.5% Here 4% VAT is local VAT within state & C u2013VAT other state.
We are using TAXINN procedure I know in this procedure values are not depending on tax code what we maintain in PO. But it will fetch taxes from condition what we maintain in FV11.My actual issue popping here is when we had created another tax code and maintaining the condition in FV11 with key combination of Material/Plant/Vendor it is not populating in PO when if click tax tab, but when if I change tax code it is showing value with this calculation it is ok and entire cycle is completed successfully but my concern here, it is triggering same GL but we want it to hit different GL as per configuration in OB40 with relevant account key and combination of tax code and GL which is the reason we had created separate tax code. What would be reason?
RegardsHI,
Check whether you have maintained the rates for the new tax code in FV11 also whether you have assigned the tax code to the company code ?
Compare the tax code which is working in PO with the one which is not & find out if there is any difference.
If you want to post the tax values to the new G/L in OB40 then maintain the same settings for the tax code which is working in PO.
Thanks & Regards, -
HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj SainiHi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards -
Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD
Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
DharmveerHi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer -
Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay
Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
KoutilyaHi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK -
Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO
Dear All,
I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pawan SardaHello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
> 4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
> 338.04 INR Dr
ECS -
> 6.76 INR Dr
HECS -
> 3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
> 400.00 INR Dr
ECS -
> 8.00 INR Dr
HECS -
> 4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM -
F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating
Dear Gurus,
For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
Regards
PrabinYou are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ? Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ? This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run. Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ? With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.
-
Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43
Hi,
Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
Checks done :
1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
3.Base amounts checked.
4. Formula for WHT checked
5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
Thanks in advanceShankar,
Thanks for reply.
If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E SP 22 to 4.7 E SP30.
My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
If any suitable answer appreciatable.
Thanks once again for your reply. -
TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO
Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj Shi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Invoking Remote Function Module.
Hi I am invoking a remote function module from a web dynpro application(External Appln ). The FM contains the following code snippet first it inserts the parameters passed into a table and then the code is SUBMIT <report name > with parameter passing
-
Trouble transferring files etc from old iMac to G4.
My friend has an old CRT iMac, not sure of the precise model but it's one the fruit coloured ones running OS 10.1. She's upgrading to my old flat panel G4 iMac running 10.4.11 but we've had trouble transferring her files, settings etc. First we tried
-
Oracle instant connection problem
In Redhat7.2 Linux, I used the connetion description as follows: orcl = (DESCRIPTION = (ADDRESS_LIST = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP) (Host = 192.168.66.85) (Port = 1521) (CONNECT_DATA = (SID = orcl) (GLOBAL_NAME = orcl.hexiong.com) And TNS_ADMIN enviro
-
ParseEscapedNSXML does it exist really?
Hi there, in my Jdev I see the function parseEscapedNSXML. When I try to use the function it compiles with no errors but I get an error in deploy "Function not registered". The user guide doesn't mention this function. What is it? Regards,
-
How do I verify my itunes account?
I've wasted half the day creating an itunes account that, when I go to itunes and try to sign in (and oh, my God, how irritating it is that you have to sign in again, and again, and again, on the webpage and in itunes... but that's another story) it