F110 Payment for Kenya rouding to 0 or 5 cents

When we offer a payment to the bank we have to round the ammount to x,x0 or x,x5
We are using the Payment Medium Workbench. How can do this?
Thanks,
Paul

I have tested this but it is only working for the discount ammount but don't rounding the payment to 0 or 5 cents.
Other options?

Similar Messages

F110 payment for invoice not more than USD 25000

Is there a way to set up the system for F110 so that the payment per vendor cannot be more than USD 25000. Any amount above it has to be paid via approval.

Hi both,
There is some standard configuration indeed. In trans. FBZP, choose "Payment methods in company code" and you will see a field "Maximum amount" (T042E-BISBT). If you set it to 25000 USD in all relevant payment methods then the payment program (trans. F110) will put the vendor payment to exceptions (with error FZ618 - Payment amount is not within the limits allowed) if the payment amount exceeds this limit. I have just tested in sandbox and it works like this:
- it does not look at single item amounts, but at the total to be paid together in one REGUH line (e.g. if you have one invoice for 11000 USD and one for 15000 USD, then both will be blocked if they fall in the same payment proposal)
- early payment discounts are deducted (e.g., if you have an invoice for 25500 USD with a 3 % discount (24735 USD net) and nothing else then it will be paid)
- however, if the payments are split (e.g., after ticking "Individual payment" LFB1-XPORE in vendor master), then it considers each invoice separately, even if their total exceeds the limit
- SAP help says that if you enter the payment method directly into the item (rather than choosing it from vendor master), then the limit is not taken into account.
So, from the above you can see that it is not a complete protection (there are loopholes and back doors) but it is the most simple - and standard - thing you can do.
Would this help? If not, then a user exit would be a solution.

FI F110 payment run multiple payment documents for same vendor l

We have an issue where a F110 automatic payment run creates two payment documents for the same vendor multiple open items in the same run. The payment method for all the open items is the same. I am not able to identify the logic based on which system bifurcates these open items to create two different payment documents. It is standard SAP functionality and we do not have any additional customization.
I have also checked criteria mentioned in FBZP Payment method in company code Payment per due day but does not seem to be relevant. If you have any pointers in this context request you to share the same at the earliest.

Hello,
In FBZP we have below setting for grouping of items in company code payment method.
1.Single payment for marked line item: Single payment will be created for every line item if this check box is selected.
2.Payment per due day: One payment document is created for all the invoices which are due on specific due date.
Please check if any of above option is selected here.
We have also control at vendor master:
Vendor master data > Company code > Payment data > Automatic payment transactions > individual payment.
If check box is selected then every vendor or customer item is paid separately during automatic payment transactions.
Thanks!
Raju

F110 payment run completed but not generated all check for the payments

Do any one have an idea or the potential answer on my query
I've run F110 and generated one Payment all 45 open items for one vendor
Now after the print done only the first 20 items got into the check register, and left over the remaining 25 items
So my question is why system not generated the check for the remaining 25 items and what is the remedy

No all settings are available, but still the same situation the all checks are not generated for all items of the vendor open items clearing in the one payment documents
single vendor
single payment for all 25 open items
After print activity compelted
checks created for items 5
leftover items 20 not created check
can anyone tell why system is behaving like this

Email notification for payments made through F110 payment run

Hi Gurus,
I have configured all the settings for the email notification through F110 payment run. I got the email also by using the email field in the address tab.
My question is the same field is using the sales team to send their customer statements and invoices. So i selected the Contact person tab and maintained the email address.
But i could not send because the contact person tab is also pointing to the same field for email ( SMTP_ADDR)
Basically i want to send email for my payment run, without interuptting the email id which is maintained for customer statements.
Can you please suggest the alternative field to send email apart from address tab ( email field )
Regards
Krish

Hi Krish,
Please go through posted discussion tread for your needful:
Re: F110 - Automatic email to vendor when payment run is carried out
Regards,
Santoshy

How to reverse F110 Posting for Payment Method Book Transfer.

Hi Gurus
I have done one payment run in F110 today. Everything is ok, except that since in my payment method the Bank details was unchecked in REGUH table the "payee account number" did not get captured.
The impact of this is in our payment file which goes to our bank the payees account details is not there becuse the value is not there in REGUH table.
So we have corrected this issue through config.
But now we want to reverse the F110 payment run and re-run F110 so that we can capture the "payee account no" in our payment file which goes to the back
Note our payment method used is Book transfer.
Can you please let me know how to reverse this F110 payment run.
Rgds
Prasad

Hi Gurus,
I got one tcode FCHD where you can reverse. If you see the F1 in the payment method it says it can be used for Check/ Bill of Exchange / Bank Transfer. But somehow this doesn't work for Bank transfer. It gives the following error.
"No check information found
Message no. FIBL573"
Can someone tell me why this Tcode doesn't work for Book transfer when in the payment method selection in FCHD its clearly mentioned that it supports Bank Transfer.
Rgds
Prasad.

HT1918 ? Valid forms of payment for iTunes in Kenya?

I live in Kenya - iTunes will not accept my KCB debit card as a valid form of payment. I am using the same card successfully on Amazon, so why wont iTunes accept it?

Lulu Clark wrote:
...... are you saying that it is not a valid form of payment for iTunes?
Correct.
The context of this thread implies iTunes.

F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.

Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please?

F110 - How to group two payments for a single costumer

Hello experts,
I'm having an issue here. The user has 14 invoices, 11 of them are DR document type, 3 are DM doc. type. All of the 14 invoices have payment method 4. When we create the proposal for this costumer, two payments are created, one for all the DR invoices, and another one for the DM invoices.
What the business want is to be able to create only one payment, including both DM and DR invoices. I tried looking into FBZP for payment method "4", both in company code and country. I flagged "Single payment for marked item" and nothing changed, 2 different payments are still created for the same customer.
Also I looked into the customer master data, on the "Payment Transaction" tab, flagged the "Single payment" but it works exactly the other way, one payment document per invoice, which I do not need. I saw something about Grouping keys, created one with GL Account, Customer and Posting key but did not work, still two payments for the same document.
Is there anything else that I can try? Any help will be appreciated. Please let me know if something is unclear.
Best regards and thanks in advance,
Ivan

Hello DSK,
First of all thanks for the reply. I tried with the grouping key in the customer master data, I created one grouping key "02" and assigned it the customer but it did not work.
The grouping key is composed by:
KUNNR
BSCHL
HKONT
Which I think are common values between the DM docs and the DR doc.s
Regards,
Ivan

F110 Payment Run

I am having a problem with F110 Payment run. It's showing the error as: 'Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax'. I have done the payment run for the same vendor, same company code and it worked well. Later, I deleted one of the WH Tax type in Vendor Master. Has anyone come across this or similar issue?. What can I do to solve this?.

hi,
I am not able to see the Deleted WH Tax info. when I run the RFWT0010. I tried to do the payment run after executing RFWT0010, but am not able to resolve the problem. I have run the S_P00_07000134(the 1099 report) a few days back(before posting the new Invoices). Do you think this has anything to do with the existing problem. And I have checked the config. again for the tax type, Tax codes and their assignments to Co.Cd. which everything seems to be correct. I tried to pay using f-53 which is showing the same error.
As Hein said i tried to look in the Invoice doc. for the WHTax info.(I have the setting to do calculate the WHTax amount @ the Payment level). So, its not possible to delete the Tax code and make the settings in VM.
As per suresh, I have checked the validity of the tax code its(1/1/2000-12/31/9999). And the tax type, tax code are assigned in the VMR.
I am not able to resolve this. Has anyone come across the same/similar issue and resolved it?.

Document not picked in f110 payment

Invoice doc: 5000000001
Due on: 12/30/2008
Baseline date: 11/10/2008
Payment terms: 50 days net due
Vendor master details:
Vendor: 241344
Payment method: E
Payment proposal Details:
Payment run on 12/29/2008 through F110 t-code
Parameters:
Identification:MTR1
Payment method: E
Vendor:1 to 99999999
Result : above invoice doc not picked
Second payment executed on same day 12/29/2008
Parameters:
MTR2
Payment method: C
Vendor: 1 to 99999999
Result: above invoice picked in proposal but not cleared giving error u201CPmnt methods for this run are not specified in master record or in itemu201D.
Again same executed on 30th but not picked but finally picked on 01/02/2009
My question is why document is not picked in MTR1 which has correct values.

Hi
Check the base line date for this IV - I dont think the document is overdue in MRT1 that is the reason it is not picked up (in frist payment run). It is overdue in the payment run (in January you run).
Check the invoice date for document getting picked up ( i hope it is with in the date), check the base line date for payment for payment proposal (I hope on 30th it is not overdue).
Thanks

Down Payment for Contracts

Hi,
I have a scenario where a vendor is having yearly contract (PO). He is paid upfront at the begining of the year when invoice for full amount is received (amount debit to vendor pre paid / alternate recon account and credit bank). Later at each month, partial amount is expensed (debit) and pre paid / alternate recon account credited accordingly. At the end of the year the full amount is expensed and pre paid account is also balanced.
I am thinking of using vendor down payment functionality (F-47, special GL indicator A), attach a PO (with Invoicing plan and ERS combination), make down payment. Up till this stage the FI entries are debit vendor pre paid / alternate recon account and credit Bank (which is expected). Now with the Invoice plan, the system creates vendor invoice automatically, FI entries are debit expense and credit vendor recon account. We don not want to pay the vendor again as down payment already exist. Is there an automated way now to post credit entry in vendor pre paid account.
I was also going through the earlier post where I found similar issue (Re: Down Payment). However while posting the invoice I am not getting the entries as mentioned in step 2 (check link) i.e. credit pre paid vendor recon account
Any help is appreciated or any solution as well
SR

we have used the following substitution to do that
pre-req
SYST-TCODE = 'F110' AND BKPF-BLART = 'KZ' AND
BSEG-BSCHL = '29' AND
BSEG-UMSKZ = 'A'
Substitution
field "Payment block' is substituted by constant " " (Empty)
Instead of KZ you need to use the document type that is assigned in the your config FBZP for Payment method in country.
This will not allow the payment for the subsequent invoices and payment program will automatically clear the Down payment when all the invoices which will net the downpayment to Zero have been posted.
Thanks
Ron

Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run

Hello all,
We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
Following are onservations
1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account
2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
Thanks & regards

Dear Rajan,
the payment document validation works as follows:
If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
payment document has already been posted.
Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
open and are selected in the next payment run again.
If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
(if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
dear Prashant,
It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
available. If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
the payment documents update is delayed.
For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
that answers to it.
Furthermore please be aware that:
as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
problem with auditors.
So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
run without any problem.
I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
Mauri

How to make a single payment for different open items with same due date

Hi,
I have created a payment method and selected "Payment per due day " option in payment method company code settings.
Even I have selected that option, Payment will not happen grouping for the items with same due date
for ex : I have two open items with one due date and another open item with another due date so when I am trying performing F110 system should make a single payment for the item with same due date and seperate payment for another item.
But system making single payment for all items
Could you please suggest anything how to make a seperate payment with due date.
Regards
VK GUPTA

Hi,
Please check Vendor Master data: FK02 ->company code data -> Payment transaction accounting: unflag 'individual payment'.
Make a test and let me know if it's okay.
regards

Open items (F110 payment proposal)

Hi All,
Can someone clarify what are open items
1: invoices that are not cleared
2: credit memos
3:credit memos applied to an invoice
4:residuals
(When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items)
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's?
Any help appreciated
Thanks,
Prashanth

1: invoices that are not cleared - YES
2: credit memos - YES, if not cleared against any invoice
3:credit memos applied to an invoice - YES
4:residuals - once you do the payment system create new invoice for balance , that will open item
When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items - if not cleared against any invoice that will come under open item list.
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's? - YES, which are in red , are called as open items...all the items in open will come in F110 proposal run
VVR

F110 Payment for Kenya rouding to 0 or 5 cents

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for