Fast switching of tools when applying local adjustments

I've recently bought LR5 and have it installed on my iMac. When using local adjustments, e.g. the adjustment brush and painting on a mask area I know the slash key can be used to switch between brushes A and B but I find I frequently also need to select Erase on the fly.
Is there a keyboard key that will select erase so I can erase then switch back to brushing the mask?

Hold down the option key and the brush will change from positive to negative enabling you to fine tune your mask.

Similar Messages

Local adjustments undo keystroke

Just wanted to mention this as an annoying behavioral bug that I'd appreciate you fixing before release.
When making local adjustments, if I'm modifying one of the sliders to an existing adjustment, then hit undo it de-selects the adjustment, so I have to go find the pin again on the photo.
So for example I have a photo where the sky is too bright. I put a gradient adjustment on the upper portion of the sky, taking down the exposure a little bit. But in addition the sky now seems flat, so I change the contrast slider to add more punch to the sky. After looking for a second, it seems too much so I hit ctrl-z to go back a step. Now I have to go back and re-select the adjustment to make changes to the sliders again, which I shouldn't have to do since I selected that several steps ago.
Thanks so much for looking at this. I love using LR, and am thrilled with the improvements coming in ver. 4.
Schlaave

That would only be possible if you remember your latest good setting.
Not much of a challenge maybe if it was just one slider. But for complex changes something like a history for the local adjustment would be useful, inside the dialog while you are still doing the adjustment.
But the OP did not even ask for that much, just for an Undo of the very latest action.

Aperture applying unwanted adjustments when loading an image

Hello,
I'm having a bit of an issue with Aperture and I'm wondering if the community can help me.
My camera is a Canon Eos 600D.
I'm running Aperture 3.4.3 on a Mid 2010 iMac 27", with 8GB of Ram.
Just lately, when I import and load images into Aperture, it seems to be applying unwanted adjustments to the photos just after it completes loading them.
Let me explain further:
I take pictures on the camera. Previewing them on the Canon they look as I would expect, and I'm happy with them.
I insert the SD card from the camera into the Mac, and Aperture previews/shows the thumbnails of my photos, and they look just like they did on the camera.
I import them into a given library.
When viewing the thumbnails of the imported images in the library, they look the same, so I double click one to load it fullscreen. The image appears fullscreen, looking exactly as it did on the camera, and Aperture pops the word 'Loading' at the top of the image.
Them when it finishes 'Loading', it seems to apply some unwanted adjustments to the photo. Mostly it applies a yellow wash to the image, and in some cases, it radically adjusts the levels.
See examples below:
This was what the image looked like after it had loaded:
And this is what it should have looked like (I had to edit it BACK to what it had looked like on the camera).
I should note that once Aperture has seemingly applied these unwanted adjustments, there is no way to undo them - 'Revert to Original' does nothing as as far as Aperture is concerned, this is the original image.
Again, notice what happens when I quick preview an image:
But when I switch out of Quick Preview, these unwanted adjustments are applied:
Please, can anyone help out with this - it's driving me crazy.
Is there a way of seeing what Aperture might be doing/applying behind the scenes? I've checked Preferences but can't see anything obvious.
Many thanks in advance.
dradd

Are you shooting raw?
Aperture is not doing any adjustments after import. Probably you have set your camera to do adjustments and you are using in-camera adjustment settings, like D-Lighting. These in-camera adjustments are reflected in the camera generated preview, that you are seeing when you are importing the image. After that, when you are opening the image, Aperture will create its own preview from the naked raw image. And that what you will see in the viewer. This preview shows exactly what your raw image is like, without any adjustments done by the camera. If you want the image processing results from the camera and not the original raw image as recorded by the camera from the sensor, import jpeg and not raw.
See this discussion: TA24505 Why do d600 raw's look totally different than the jpg's that are imported together. When I select a raw, it looks as if it gets adjusted, but I can't figure out why...
Regards
Léonie

MDNS cannot be configured when FlexConnect Local Switching is enabled

I am running Cisco Prime Infrastructu tore 1.3 and I am trying to push a template to allow flexconect local switching on a wlan. However, when I attempt this, I get the message "mDNS cannot be configured when FlexConnect Local Switching is enabled" and I cannot save the template or apply it to controllers. My controllers are WISM 2s running 7.0.235.3.

Make sure you uncheck the mDNS option on the advanced tab of the WLAN template. You cannot use mDNS in conjunction with Flexconnect locally switched WLANs.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Windows 8.1 U1 bug with unresponsive start screen when fast-switching users

While testing out the bug described here ( http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/c9a3c605-9e7f-47ce-84ec-791a1627ebf0/windows-81-u1-hiding-taskbar-in-multimonitors-setup-bug?forum=w8itprogeneral ), I've found another bug - if the secondary
monitor is lower than the main one, start screen becomes completely unresponsive when fast switching users. You can click on any tiles, on start in lower left corner or try searching apps - it does nothing. Here's the screen recording http://1drv.ms/1k8au8O
. The secondary screen is usable at the same time, and sometimes you can run start screen on it (in such a case, it disappears on main screen and appears on secondary screen, but is also unresponsive), or you can't click at start icon at all (it appears highlighted
in the taskbar and doesn't response to clicks).
MSFT's testers should test such a setup a bit more, I think.

Hi,
What’s your meaning of secondary monitor is lower than the main one?
I test the dual screen, fast user switching works good, so what’s your condition?
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Couldn't delete Local Adjustments (Dodge, Burn) from Virtual Copy/Photoshop Edit

Setup: Lightroom 2.3 on Mac with latest OSX
1. I applied some settings to an image in LR, along with some local adjustments using the LR Adjustment tools.
2. I made a virtual copy of that image to apply some further adjustments, and I wanted to remove the local adjustments from this copy, so I deleted the adjustment points from this virtual copy. I also clicked "reset" on the Local Adjustments panel.
3. I do a Command+E to open up the virtual copy image in Photoshop for further edits. Problem: in photoshop the effects of the local adjustment tool are still displaying. There are dodge and burn marks in the image per the local adjustments I made in the master image, but removed from the virtual copy.
4. I rechecked the virtual copy and could see no sign of the local adjustments still in the file.
To resolve this, I had to return to the master copy, delete the local adjustments in the master copy, and create a new virtual copy.
Is this normal... I should be able to remove a local adjustment in my virtual copy and let the master copy keep its adjustments, no?

No. You cannot be taken seriously.
1. Photoshop is not Illustrator / Fireworks / Premiere / After effects / Dreamweaver / InDesign. Thank god Adobe. It is already bloated enough.
2. Much worse: your improvement list is sometimes faulty.
These are randomly selected examples:
Anri Orlow schrieb:
When you are duplicating and coping layers the layer panel becomes a horrible mess with dozens on layers with names like "Layer 123 copy 14" and it's very hard to sort it all out. Maybe it's better to copy layer with the same name as it's original?
Rename your layer. See screenshot.
Anri Orlow schrieb:
When you try to drag n' drop a layer holding down Alt to copy it, and it's already placed on top of the layer stack you have no ability to copy it on top of original one. I think it must be fixed
False. Press first Alt and move the layer a little bit upwards until you see the light line.
Anri Orlow schrieb:
Custom shapes. I understand why they are separated buy setst, but why does dialog this stupid annoying "do you really want to replace this set with another" appears every time you change the set??? And why can't we review all the sets in the same time?
What - in your opinion - means the upmost entry in the list?
Anri Orlow schrieb:
Why we can add as many raster masks to the layer but can't do the same with vector masks? Why?
Only 1 layermask + 1 vectormask maximum per layer. Try it.
3. Some of your wishes are ok, but have in mind: different people have different wishes.
miss marple

Feature Request: More Local Adjustments

Sometimes it's nessesary to correct hue/saturation locally — change face colour or something like that. And it would be good to have such brush. Together with ability to change Fill Light, Black and Vibrance in a part of image. Why the current selection of brushes is so narrow?

alex krylov wrote:
Sometimes it's nessesary to correct hue/saturation locally — change face colour or something like that. And it would be good to have such brush. Together with ability to change Fill Light, Black and Vibrance in a part of image.
+1 vote.
Although, its amazing what can be done with the current complement with some practice. For example, opposing color can be added to remove color casts... I often paint with brightness and contrast all the way down and exposure way up to bring detail out of shadows...
alex krylov wrote:
Why the current selection of brushes is so narrow?
My theory is that it is due to the limitation of the present design - limiting the brushes keeps it fast. People with inside knowlege don't much respond on the forum to these types of questions, so us outsiders may never know for sure... But if you think about how painted sharpening is implemented, its just a series of offsets that are applied to the global sharpen settings, so Lightroom doesn't have to do a bunch of different sharpening - just one pass, applying the net amount in each area.
Summary: I think the present complement of local adjustments has been carefully chosen to keep the develop module efficient in accordance with the present design, and to expand the local adjustments a great deal will require some redesigning. I hope I'm wrong and that it will be easier than I would imagine to add local white-balance & fill... If I'm right, I hope Adobe redesigns the develop module for Lr4 in order to expand the local adjustments.
Finally: My present thinking for Lightroom is that this will be too much for Lightroom 4, and that we are more likely to see incremental changes to the Develop module (maybe improved distraction removal) combined with new features like soft-proofing and photobooks... That said, I have switched my desire for Lightroom, to have better integration with external editors, so one can take it as far as possible in Lightroom, but be better able to integrate outside work done on selected photos.
Rob

Sharing Itunes library with another User Account & Fast Switching

Hi. I recently purchased a new iMac G5 and am in the process of setting it up to be used by 2 separate users (girlfriend and me). I apologize in advance if this is more of an Itunes issue and not solely an Administration issue.
My question deals with creating a new user account on my Mac (with Fast Switching) and allowing my girlfriend to share my iTunes library with the ability to transfer music to her ipod when she is logged into her own unique account. I will be the Administrator on the Mac.
We are trying to avoid loading our music two times into the Mac under each of our logins. Is there a way that we can share the music I have already loaded into my Itunes library when she is logged into her account so that she can transfer to her ipod and create her own distinct playlists? If so, any advice on how to enable this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Seth
iMac G5 Mac OS X (10.4.3)

Unfortunately, baltwo's solution will not allow your girlfriend to create any playlists or copy songs to iPod.
The easiest thing would be to share the entire music folder, so anyone of you can listen to your music.
You'd have two options.
If you want to be using the exact same library, so any playlist you created can be edited by your girlfriend and vice versa:
1. Go to yourusername/Music/iTunes. You'll find two files called "iTunes library" and "iTunes music library" Copy them to your desktop, so you'll have a backup just in case.
2. Move your yourusername/Music folder to computer/users/shared. (The folder will be copied ONLY in case your using FileVault, so you'd have to delete the original User/Music folder after making sure you'd got a functional copy at computer/users/shared) Select users/shared, press "apple+i" to get the info window, go to "Ownership" change all permissions to "read & write" and hit "apply to enclosed items"
3. In case you're using FileVault, either delete or rename the original Music folder within your own account. Again, not necessary as long as FileVault isn't enabled.
4. Select computer/users/shared/music, hold down "ctrl" while clicking on it and choose "create alias" from the contextual menu. Copy that alias into your homefolder as well as your girlfriend's account (need to log in) and rename it to "music" without the "alias" at the end.
5. Launch iTunes. Done.
6. Don't worry, in case you don't see your music. I've used a slightly different approach, yet this one should work totally fine.
If you want to listen to the same music, yet be able to set up your own playlists, ratings etc.:
For your account:
- go to yourusername/Music/iTunes, move "iTunes Music" to computer/users/shared and change ownership according to #2.
- If FileVault is enabled, check #3. Of course, you want to rename the original "iTunes Music" in this case.
- create an alias for computer/users/shared/iTunes Music and copy the alias to yourusername/Music/iTunes. Rename it to "iTunes Music" without "alias".
- Launch iTunes. Should be working the way it used to. Quit.
For your girlfriend's account:
- log in, copy alias to username/Music/iTunes, rename alias.
- Launch iTunes, go to File-> Add to Library, select username/Music/iTunes/iTunes Music, choose.
That's it.
The only downside is, only one user at a time can access the music folder, so if you're logged in and running iTunes, you're girlfriend, logged in via fast user switching, won't be able to open iTunes until you quit it for yourself. Haven't found a way around this yet.
Fell free to report any issues.
huhh...rather long posting...

Lightroom has a hard time with local adjustments:

Local adjustments: Spotting / Cloning / Healing Brush, Adjustmenst Brush, Graduated filter
I posted the piece below as a response to thaehn’s post “Lightroom freezes on Dust Spot Removal” but I thought the topic is important enough to warrant its own post.
This in advance: I'm running WIN XP SP4 with all available patches; have 4 GB of RAM; have a dual-core processor at 3 GB.
Apart from my drive C, I have two internal hard drives in Raid 0 configuration (thus they show up as one drive). I also have an external hard drive that's in Raid 1 ( "mirroring') and is connected by fire-wire 400.
Yes, LR "freezes" when using the dust spot tool and also when using the adjustment brush or - but to a lesser degree - when using the grad filter.
My observation though is that it's not a true "freezing", because if I wait long enough LR starts working again. So when using these tools, LR gets extremely busy und just doesn't have enough resources left to respond to further commands right away - but it "stores" the comands and acts on them eventually.
If I turn on my task manager I observe the following when using these tools: the CPU gets extremely busy (i.e. the green bar is at 100%) while the RAM usage is high but not to the max. The "freezes" occur when and as long the CPU works at 100%. If the CPU is below 100% LR responds sluggish and the response is normal again when eventually the CPU usage is at 0%.
Also, in my observation, this behaviour of LR is compounding, i.e. the wait-times for my CPU to get back to 0 are increasing, the longer I work with these tools or the more photos I work on. Re-starting LR does not bring change: the behaviour establishes itself when using the tools again. It is as if LR needs to do some work in the background and that this background work piles up the longer I work in LR.
I am not a software or hardware specialist, so the following observations are somewhat subjective and not really quantifiable.
In Photoshop I observed a similar behaviour (although never as bad) when working on files of 500 MB and above. It was particularly bad when working on photos residing on my external RAID 1 hard drive. I had a hunch that it might have to do with the reading and writing from a drive that a) is external and b) is in RAID 1. It is known that RAID 1 has slower writing (and also reading) speeds than RAID 0 (or no RAID at all). So in Photoshop I managed to cut down on the unresponsiveness by moving large files to my internal RAID 0 hard drive and working from there.
From this experience I come to the assumption that some of the "busy-ness" in LR (or of the CPU) is due to reading/writing to/from the hard drive.
To test this assumption for LR, I moved some photos from my external (RAID 1) to my internal (RAID 0) hard drive and did some "intensive" work: first some "fancy" lens correction, then a few grad filters, and a "final touch" with the adjustment brush. I thought that LR could handle these tasks somewhat better when the photos were on the internal drive - so some of the "sluggishness" or " freezing" is due to the reading/writing from/to the hard drive.
Acually I cannot explain why this should be so: In my naivete I thought LR writes everything only into the catalog (?), that - by the way - is on my internal RAID 0 drive.
I think it would be good if Adobe could look into this and maybe give us some recommendations, just as they do for Photoshop by saying that the scratch disk should be on a different drive than Photoshop.
But it seems also that local adjustments - spotting, adj. brush. etc - are a very high "number-crunching" business for LR - independent of where the photo is located on the drive. (Interestingly the grad filter is not as bad as the adjustment brush). The clone-tool in Photoshop hardly registers on my CPU and if at all only with a very short spike, while the clone tool in LR sends the CPU through the roof for 10 to 30 seconds- even when the photo in question is on the internal drive.
I'm sure loots of people will now tell me that this is due to the difference between pixel-based adjustment and non-pixel-based ones. OK, I acknowledge that. But still ...
It seems some guys are still in denial about this (or maybe they have two quad processors and 16 GB of RAM):
But it's a fact: LR has a hard time with localized adjustments. There must be by now 100's of complaints to that respect, and that can't be dismissed by blaming it on the hardware specs alone.
I just hope Adobe is working on that.
LR3 is a fantastic program that I would not want to work without. Often I have to work on a lot of photos with a very tight deadline. Without LR it would be impossible.
Thank you,
ErnstK

You are right Samoreen.
I posted my above message in July 2010 and this topic has been re-opened by Adobe under the thread Lightroom 3.3 Performance Feedback
I think it would be best if everybody would post their concerns only under this thread.
Otherwise we'd have two different threads for the same issue.
So let's close this one here.
WW

Local adjustments slow on Vista 64 (LR 2.1 - not a Nvidia problem)

Hi,
I am using LR 2.0/2.1 from the release of the 2.0 and recently has migrated my PC to Vista 64bit. My hardware is 2 years old but nevertheless is quite up to task - P4 dual core 3.2 Ghz CPU with 4 GB of RAM and SATA RAID with XFX GeForce 6800XT card (with 512MB of card RAM).
It is a very fast system in general but I do have some problems in LR 2.1 with a local adjustments brushes. I know it's a well discussed topic however I feel that in my case it is sufficiently different to warrant a new topic. I've done all the Nvidia driver optimisations - setting all the driver properties to max performance for LR. This did make a difference initially but as brush strokes are added the lags are getting worse and if I have about 8-10 strokes and more - it gets really unusable - very slow to catch up with delays as much as a minute or two.
I don't run any antiviruses or any other scanning utils other that bog standard Vista 64 bit services (all the potential scanning services like disk indexing, defender scanning has been disabled for the purpouse of the performance testing - nothing made a difference). What is curious though, that a few people who have the brush working fast were saying that CPU was not topping up and in my case I noticed that both cores were used quite a lot when the delays started to occur (with the number of strokes around 8 or 10 and more). The combined CPU usage went up to 90% (so both cores were used extensively). I have a relatively medium catalog - around 10000 photos.
Setting the automask on/off does not make a lot of difference - with the automsak off it only is more responsive for a couple more further strokes and then slows down again.
I am sort of exhausted my options of what to investigate further and would appreciate any constructive comments of where to look and what to look for (please no Adobe blaiming here). I will also appreciate some Adobe engineers comments on the CPU usage of the adjustment brush and possible also insights of how can I look at what's going on.
Thanks,
Alex

I've contributed elsewhere but I'll just add another voice to this thread. Same cumulative slowdown here with a very similar system. I don't know if you have noticed but it's not only the brush strokes that slow down to treacle speed. If you get fed up waiting for a response and start clicking buttons you can find them reacting sequentially for up to a minute. Its like watching a very slow recorded tutorial. It's the same for adjustment sliders once the slowdown is under way.
Also I find that if you move the brush too quickly it will abreviate the curve you create into a series of angles. I postulate that, in the case of my Intuos tablet at least, the program has a problem responding to the data rate from the tablet. An example is if I tap the pen in the image, lift and go quickly to make a menu selection. The brush will continue to draw after the pen has lifted along the line of cursor movement and I have to go back and delete the stroke.
Brian

Problem when apply SAP Bundle Patch for 10.2.0.5

Hi,
We are trying to apply SAP Bundle Patch (SBP) SAP_102052_201102_SOL64.zip and SAP_102052_201103_SOL64.zip using MOPatch utility. Both MOPatch and OPatch utility have been updated with the latest download from SAP. When applying patch for SAP_102052_201102, most patches went through except for one patch that requires OPatch to be version 10.2.0.5.0. The OPatch version downloaded from SAP is 10.2.0.4.9. Even the OPatch delievered together in the SAP_102052_201102_SOL64.zip file is 10.2.0.4.9.
Below are extract of the opatch log file for this patch:
INFO:ApplySession applying interim patch '10248542' to OH '/oracle/DEV/102_64'
INFO:Starting to apply patch to local system at Wed Mar 23 10:49:25 SGT 2011
SEVERE:OUI-67073:ApplySession failed: ApplySession failed to prepare the system.
Patch 10248542 requires OPatch version 10.2.0.5.0.
The OPatch version being used (10.2.0.4.9) doesn't meet the minimum version required by the patch(es). Please download latest OPatch from My Oracle Support.
INFO:System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
INFO:Finishing ApplySession at Wed Mar 23 10:49:25 SGT 2011
INFO:Total time spent waiting for user-input is 0 seconds. Finish at Wed Mar 23 10:49:25 SGT 2011
INFO:Stack Description: java.lang.RuntimeException: ApplySession failed to prepare the system.
Patch 10248542 requires OPatch version 10.2.0.5.0.
The OPatch version being used (10.2.0.4.9) doesn't meet the minimum version required by the patch(es). Please download latest OPatch from My Oracle Support.
Help appreciated.
Regards,
Lim

Hi,
I went to
http://service.sap.com/oracle-download
then
Oracle 10.2.0.5
then
OPatch
The file I can see there is generic for ALL operating systems and the name is:
OPatch_10205_Generic_v0.zip
it seems that the version is 10.2.0.5, not 10.2.0.4.9 as you mentioned.
I have downladed it and look at the README:
Patch summary:
README file for OPatch 10.2.0.5.0, the Oracle Interim Patching Tool.
I'm not installing it, but it seems that the version is not the same as yours.
Is this the one you have downloaded?
Have you installed it properly? => may be you are running an older one

Local adjustments - jumping between sliders

Hi.
In short - <tab> button does not work in the panels of Local Adjustment Brush and Graduated Filter.
In detail, I often adjusting images using keyboard, especially in the Basic panel.
Because it's better to use sliders from top to right, I'm using following procedure:
1. Clicking to text field of the top most slider (usually Exposure)
2. Adjusting value using Shift+Up/Down Arrows
3. Fine tuning using Up/Down Arrows
4. Pressing Tab to jump to next slider, or Shift+Tab for previous if needed
And so on.
But unfortunatly Tab and Shift+Tab does not work in the panels of Local Adjustments tools.
I think this is not a bug but rather missing feature - it does not work in previous versions too.
But it's really missing.

SistersCountry wrote:
When doing heavy highlight or exposure recovery using local adjustments on RAW files I can see a demonstrable difference many times between using automask and not using it.
The "heavy highlight or exposure recovery" is a key...Auto Mask works well when the adjustment are subtle–which is what it was designed for. If you are expecting accurate masking when making radical changes, it simply will not work. For that you really need to go into Photoshop and use really accurate selection techniques to get accurate results.

How to solve 'java/lang/OutOfMemoryError' when apply weblogic patch 10.3.6.0.10?

Hi All: Our platform is IBM AIX power system 64 bit, os level 6. Oracle Fusion Middleware version is 10.3.6.0.8. We tried to patch 10.3.6.0.10 on it, but encounter ‘out of memory error’ when applied WebLogic patch 10.3.6.0.10 on UAT report server. Currently UAT has 3GB memory (currently is 3G) .
JVMDUMP006I Processing dump event "systhrow",
detail "java/lang/OutOfMemoryError
JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Heap dump using
'/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utilhd' in response to an event
JVMDUMP010I Heap dump written to
/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/heapdump.20150224.152727.6422620.0001.phd
JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Java dump using
'/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/javacore.20150224.152727.6422620.0002.txt'
in response to an event
JVMDUMP010I Java dump written to
/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/javacore.20150224.152727.6422620.0002.txt
JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Snap dump using
'/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/Snap.20150224.152727.6422620.0003.trc'
in response to an event
JVMDUMP006I Processing dump event "systhrow",
detail "java/lang/OutOfMemoryError" - please wait.
JVMDUMP010I Snap dump written to
/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/Snap.20150224.152727.6422620.0003.trc
JVMDUMP013I Processed dump event "systhrow",
detail "java/lang/OutOfMemoryError".
JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Heap dump using
'/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/heapdump.20150224.152735.6422620.0004.phd'
in response to an event
JVMDUMP010I Heap dump written to
/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/heapdump.20150224.152735.6422620.0004.phd
JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Java dump using
'/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/javacore.20150224.152735.6422620.0005.txt'
in response to an event
JVMDUMP010I Java dump written to
/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/javacore.20150224.152735.6422620.0005.txt
JVMDUMP032I JVM requested Snap dump using
'/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/Snap.20150224.152735.6422620.0006.trc'
in response to an event
Exception in thread "main"
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError at
java.lang.StringBuffer.ensureCapacityImpl(StringBuffer.java:335)
at
java.lang.StringBuffer.append(StringBuffer.java:201)
at
java.lang.Class.throwNoSuchMethodException(Class.java:278)
at
java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:845)
at
com.bea.cie.common.dao.xbean.XBeanDataHandler.isValueSet(XBeanDataHandler.java:958)
at
com.bea.cie.common.dao.xbean.XBeanDataHandler.getValueFromObject(XBeanDataHandler.java:589)
at
com.bea.cie.common.dao.xbean.XBeanDataHandler.getSimpleValue(XBeanDataHandler.java:431)
at
com.bea.plateng.patch.dao.cat.PatchDependency.getRule(PatchDependency.java:48)
at
com.bea.plateng.patch.dao.cat.PatchCatalogHelper.getInvalidatedPatchMap(PatchCatalogHelper.java:1625)
at com.bea.plateng.patch.PatchSystem.updatePatchCatalog(PatchSystem.java:436)
at
com.bea.plateng.patch.PatchSystem.refresh(PatchSystem.java:130)
at
com.bea.plateng.patch.PatchSystem.setCacheDir(PatchSystem.java:201)
at
com.bea.plateng.patch.Patch.main(Patch.java:281)
JVMDUMP010I Snap dump written to
/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/Snap.20150224.152735.6422620.0006.trc
JVMDUMP013I Processed dump event "systhrow",
detail "java/lang/OutOfMemoryError".
Exception in thread "Attach API wait loop"
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
at
com.ibm.tools.attach.javaSE.CommonDirectory.waitSemaphore(CommonDirectory.java:222)
at
com.ibm.tools.attach.javaSE.AttachHandler$WaitLoop.waitForNotification(AttachHandler.java:329)
at com.ibm.tools.attach.javaSE.AttachHandler$WaitLoop.run(AttachHandler.java:396)
bsu.sh -install -patch_download_dir=/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/utils/bsu/cache_dir -patchlist=12UV -prod_dir=/ora_bin01/u01/oracle/Middleware/wlserver_10.3
we followed the README.txt instructions, and stop/start weblogic service before/after apply patch. Can anyone suggest a solution or Doc ID for helping us?
thank you very much!

Solutions: Bounce the applications and check the arguments if you can increase it. It is due to memory issue
You can set these values in CommEnv.sh (.cmd for windows) file located in the weblogic_home/common/bin directory.
This gets applied to all the domains under that wls home.
If you want to make the changes to specific domain then edit the SetDomainEnv.sh file located under the domain/bin directory.
How to solve java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
solutions: export JVM_ARGS="-Xms1024m -Xmx1024m"
How to solve java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
solution : export JVM_ARGS="-XX:PermSize=64M -XX:MaxPermSize=256m"

How to stop the option key from changing tools when trying to subtract from a selection?

How to stop the option key from changing my tools when I am trying to subtract from a selection?
I'm running CS3 on Mac OS Leopard, and the automatic tool switching slows me down, but even preferences doesn't show a way to turn this off.
Thanks for your help.

With any marquee tool, JUST holding down the option key should not switch tools. You need to explain the problem much more carefully, It's completely impossible to tell from your description whats going wrong.
automatic tool switching
The only preference related to this, is to do with the SHIFT KEY - "use Shift key for tool switch".

Fast switching problem

When I Fast Switch to new user, everything seems to work perfectly: the Users Desktop appears and I can click on Applications in the Dock, the Hard drive spins up and the little blue dot appears indicating that the Application has opened, but nothing appears on the Desk Top. I can use Apple=Tab short cut to move between Open Applications, but no Application Window ever appears. Also the Menu Bar across the top doesn't work properly: I can highlight Icons TimeMachine and see when the last Backup was done, nothing else. The only choice is to Hold the power button down until the system completely shutsdown and restart.
Any ideas?
Thank you
Damian

Test in safe mode.
Mac OS X: Starting up in Safe Mode

Fast switching of tools when applying local adjustments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for