Faster loading

I have created a projector with 10 screens and audio on each
screen. It
takes forever for it to load. I think there is a way to start
the
presentation before all the media loads but I cannot find
information on it
anywhere. I would like the presentation to begin right away.
How can I
have it begin as the other media loads in the background?
thanks,
cj

search MM Technotes or any tutorial for "stub projector",
that's what
you're looking for
hth
Ned

Similar Messages

  • Teradata fast load log file empty

    hei all,
    after update odi 11g teradata fast load script not running, error tells to see the log file but log is empty
    any solution
    naseer

    any solution please

  • IWeb site remade in Dreamweaver - cleaner code, faster loading?

    I love iWeb. But iWeb sites load slow ... and there is a LOT of messy code in there (my web experts and html whiz friends tell me this). I've tried optimizers, but found they often create odd and unpredictable glitches on individual pages. And only speed up the load process by 10%.
    I'm experimenting with designing the site in iWeb, then transferring all the materials\text\graphics into Dreamweaver ... to see if this gives me a faster loading site. I wonder if I'm wasting my time?
    And I'd love to know a way to have the iWeb sites load faster ...
    Ben

    I don't think you can pin it down to a percentage for each page. If you watch WSM as it optimizes your files you will see the saving for each file in the window - if you are quick!
    I publish my websites to Mobile Me to test them and then optimize and upload them to a commercial server. The difference in download time is noticeable.
    Where WSM really scores is when trying to get your website to load in IE - the World's Worst Browser.
    Pages that hang and lock up IE will usually load after optimizing.
    I have had the band of missing background occasionally. Usually I would just run the files again and mistakes are corrected - sometimes it takes two or three passes.
    After running the files again I launch the offending page in my browser directly from the WSM output folder (by double clicking the .html file) so that I can check it before uploading again.

  • Does iWeb automatically compress photos for faster loading? Or should I do it first? Thx

    Hi everyone, when I look at the large photo in the "white" theme's Welcome template, I wonder when I drag and drop one of my photos in, does iWeb compress the photo for faster loading? Or should I compress them before adding to site?
    By "compress" I mean, make photo file size smaller! :)
    Thx! :)

    In iWeb Preferences you can optimze images on import. But I always scale most of my images to 800 x 600 pixels prior to importing. I do this in Graphic Coverter which also makes the image files smaller by taking unneeded information out of the file, which also reduces the file size.
    In Graphic Converter

  • IWeb 09 any cleaner code?  Any faster loading pages?

    Just wondering if iWeb 09 has improved in writing cleaner\faster code? Are the pages loading any more quickly than in earlier versions. I've got half a dozen fairly complicated sites done with whatever the last version of iWeb was before 09 ... I'm wondering if I rework them, reload and republish them with 09, whether I will see any improvement in end-user performance (faster-loading pages)?
    Ben

    I have upgraded to iLife '09 seems that pages load EVEN slower than before! Especially on I.E. 6 and 7 browsers. I downloaded the trial of Maestro to see if that would help. No dice.
    Site after Maestro: http://www.only2degrees.com/kktmp/Only2Degrees/Home.html
    you don't even want to know how much worse it was before I ran Maestro on it. .iWebSite.js seems to be what super-bloats this iWeb. I can remove it, but then it disables all the links and buttons.
    the java script seems to just loop and loop and loop and loop and... well you get the picture, all through each page causing it to load slowly. I too at each new release of iWeb hope that Apple has heard us and fixed this problem. They have not. I call and they tell me they will look into it and report it, etc...
    In an ideal world everyone would own a Mac and use Safari or FireFox as their browsers. But it's not ideal, sure wish there was a better way for those of us who don't hand code or have the time to hand code to be able to use iWeb or anything similar to create decent websites.
    Any suggestions or answers would be awesome!
    Kerilyn

  • Iphoto faster loading?

    why is iphoto faster loading images in full size than aperture?
    aperture loads a proxy (lower res) image with the "loading" sign ontop of it and it takes several seconds until the full res high quality is loaded. while in iphoto it's loaded instantly.
    any idea why and how i can speed up the loading in aperture?
    thx

    What version of iPhoto? Assuming 09 or later...
    Option 1
    Back Up and try rebuild the library: hold down the command and option (or alt) keys while launching iPhoto. Use the resulting dialogue to rebuild. Choose to Rebuild iPhoto Library Database from automatic backup.
    If that fails:
    Option 2
    Download iPhoto Library Manager and use its rebuild function. This will create a new library based on data in the albumdata.xml file. Not everything will be brought over - no slideshows, books or calendars, for instance - but it should get all your albums and keywords back.
    Because this process creates an entirely new library and leaves your old one untouched, it is non-destructive, and if you're not happy with the results you can simply return to your old one. .
    Regards
    TD

  • Tuning OWB 10g Mappings for fast loading

    Hi,
    What are the various techniques in which I can tune my OWB mappings for optimized performance?
    Is it a good idea to increase my commit frequency from 1000 to say 25,000 to reduce I/O?
    What other parameters could be important to the fast loading of data?
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Harshad Borgaonkar

    If you say loading, do you mean inserting?
    If so, I gather from the fact that for you the commit frequency is relevant, that you are not using set-based loading, which is the fastest way to load records. Any reason why you don't use set-based loading, or didn't you know that the commit frequency is irrelevant in that case?
    Kind regards,
    Jaap.

  • OLEDB Destination Fast Load Auto Truncation

    I have one Data Flow task with OLEDB Source(for SQL Server) and OLEDB Destination(for SQL Server).
    In OLEDB destination I have used Fast Load option. Also I handled error rows to move to error table.
    In my source I have with columns column1(int) , Column2(Varchar(10)).
    Destination has two column column1(int) , Column2(Varchar(7)).
    Error table has 4 columns column1(int) , Column2(Varchar(10)), Error number(nvarchar(max)), Error Description(varchar(max))
    In source, column2 values are more than 7 charactors.
    When I run the package, destination loading only with first 7 charactors for Column2.Truncation happening for remaining charactors.I dont want to do like this.If the destination length is suufficient then the entire row should be moved
    to my error table.
    When I check Error tab option of destination Even Truncate also in disabled state to enable the redirect row.

    Truncation must raise an error and the error rows should redirect in your scenario, so what you described does not make sense.
    No, when writing to SQL Server the data will be truncated, without error.
    The only thing you get is a warning when designing the package.
    You get truncation errors when you try to put data longer than the column width in the data flow buffer, i.e. at the source or at transformations, but not at the destination apparently.
    @Prabu: you can check the length using a conditional split. If the lenght is too long, redirect the row yourself to the error table.
    MCSE SQL Server 2012 - Please mark posts as answered where appropriate.

  • SSIS Fast Load fails to copy correct number of rows

    Step 1 - truncate destination table
    on success
    Using obdc source table source to a odbc destination use a fast table load to take three colums out of source, and copy to destination.
    In the source, column 1 is the primary key (int)
    Other two columns are time stamps
    Destination table, column 1 is int (no keys) - does not allow nulls, column 2 & 3 allow nulls
    Noramlly the rowcount in the source and destination tables match after a run. However, on occasions, the destination table count is less than the source table. On the destination odbc source, we enable identify insert and check constraints. I can't see how we'd drop rows since by definition the row needs to existing in the source (we're copying the primary key).
    The first time this occurred, anecdotal information is that the source sql server was under memory stress.
    Has anyone seen this behavior before? Any ideas on how to resolve it?
    Ken

    I just ran into this same issue.  After a solid half day of troubleshooting I found this little 'fast load' setting to be the culprit. 
    We have a very simple copy operation taking rows out of an ODBC source, adding a column and then stuffing them into a destination ODBC source.  All the operations were run on a development machine with a local SQL Server install and plenty of RAM/CPU headroom.
    I'd enabled logging of all kinds everywhere trying to detect the problem but nothing was tripped.  When run under debug mode (in dev studio) I see the correct number of rows (684 in this case) reported being sent to the ODBC destination; however, when I look in the table itself I only ever see the first one.
    As soon as I turned off the fast load option then I started getting the full data set moving over properly.
    At this point, I'm of a mind to go through and remove 'fast load' from every one of my packages.  I'll take reliability over speed any day of the week.

  • How to create several fast loading big albums in iWeb using your own templates

    hi guys - here comes one for the real cracks.
    i am trying to create a nice PICTURES page containing about 100 albums with each of it containing up to 100 individual pictures on my website, where i also have several videos online and (soon) audio files - everything available for download.
    my problem is that the main "My album" page in iWeb will always ALL sub albums on just one page, which would in my case lead to endless loading time - i have now 30 albums online and it already takes ages to display all of them.
    so i want to create several album pages, each of them displaying only 6 individual sub albums and this way allow a decent page loading time. this is usually done by just adding a new "my album" page using one of apple's templates. and here is my problem: my web site design is made from scratch and is not similar to any of apple's templates. since iWeb does not allow you to save your individual pages as "templates" i had to go a long way around, using iWebsites and merge a newly created picture template page (containing my own duplicated "my album") with ma main site. for some reason this did almost work out but in the end not really - if you are interested have a look at the separate discussion in this forum
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/15532580#15532580  (how to save any iWeb page as a template)
    so my question here is if any of you know of any other way to achieve my goal of getting several individual main albums containing 6 subalbums (this way it fits on one page and allow NOT having to scroll down at all) and this in a way which will fit the design of my web page. have a look at the now existing pictures page and imagine that i want more or less the same but divided in individual pages containing only 6 albums per page:
    http://www.giorgiodellapietra.com/giorgiodellapietra.com/PICTURES/PICTURES.html
    here an example of how it should look like in the end:
    http://www.giorgiodellapietra.com/giorgiodellapietra.com/PICTURES/Seiten/MIXED.h tml#0
    thank you very much for your impact.
    cheers
    george

    hi folks
    don't worry, i have given up as it really seems iWeb can not do this.
    however, i have identified 2 possible solutions. the one i have chosen is to simply add new albums by choosing one of apple's templates and then modify it until it fits my design. i have created 15 additional main albums this way and it took me (because of the "mass production") only 15 minutes per album to get it done. now i have enough empty albums spare for the next few years...
    the other way to accomplish what i wanted would have been to make the main "my album" page invisible for visitors and use it only for administration (so it can contain 100 albums but nobody would ever have to wait until they load). then create a new page which i call picture (copy any of my other pages and modify it) on which i will post some "virtual albums", which means use any picture out of an album and create a direct link to the album. i could use a vary low resolution version of the main pic and this way i would have a "picture" page which loads extremely fast but is actually nothing else than a link to the real album. then just copy this page as many times as i need albums and change the pictures and the links in it. the advantage is that it loads very fast, the disadvantage that i loose the ability to scroll through albums by moving the mouse over it, as what you see is of course only a picture and not the album.
    i have chosen the first version because it has the advantage to be able to move albums as one pleases. however, both versions would be fine.
    it's already done and eaten.
    thanks anyway for reading yourself through this...
    cheers
    george

  • Video Clips.  Embed them or link them for faster loading?

    Hello All,
    Which method is better for iWeb (making the website load faster): I need to show some short video clips on the site I'm building, so should I embed the clips or just have a link that will redirect you to the site the has the clips (a site like Vimeo.com). Or does that make any difference in the loading time>
    Thanks for your help.
    Mike

    I found the problem with the software. You can not use Acrobat Professional 7.0 with FrameMaker 8.0 or you will not be able to properly Distil the PDF and the video will only be an image of the first frame. You are not able to install the Distiller 8.0 add-on that comes with FrameMaker 8.0 with the Acrobat Professional 7.0 installed. The console error received when creating the PDF is:
    "Save as PDF failed to post-process the PDF file for Flash Data: errors were encountered in the PDF file.
    The PDF file should be intact and usable but may not reflow properly. Check that the destination PDF file is not in use or its permissions, then Save as PDF again. If the problem persists, please contact Adobe Technical Support."
    The fix is to remove Acrobat Professional 7.0 permanently and install the FrameMaker add-on or to upgrade to Professional 8.0

  • How can I host my full-bleed images (such as browser fill) on a CDN (such as Amazon3) for fast load?

    Hey,
    I was wondering if anyone know how to use a Contenct Delivery Network (such as Amazon S3) to host large images on my Muse site so that they upload faster?
    Thanks

    Yes, you can add web hosted images to your site by clicking Object-> Insert HTML...
    and adding the <img src="" /> tag there:
    However, I do not know that this will increase your loading speed.
    Hope this helps,
    Julia

  • Faster loading of site and pages?

    I have a site that I'm still working on. It has 15+ pages- 14 pages have the same master page, the Home Page has a different Master. When I view in Browser view, and use the buttons to take me to another page, it reloads the entire new page and takes 4-5 seconds to appear. Is there a way to make this transition faster? Also, can I design one long page, placing "pages" one on top of the other (the whole sit could be scrolled), then linking each "page" section to the menu buttons? Hope I've made myself clear. (Bet you can't tell I'm stupidly new at this). Thank you.

    Hello,
    To answer your first question, it takes more time if you have heavy images or any heavy content on the page. However once the page loads up for the first time, when you come back to the page it loads up quickly as it picks up all the images from cache.
    Also try to put more content on Master pages (if possible) as Master page content will also be loaded using cache and it will help your pages load faster.
    And regarding your second query, you can acheive this in Adobe Muse by creating only one page and adding all the content to it. After that use Anchor links and place them on the required places in the page and link them to the menu.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Sachin

  • Faster loading of images?

    Hi,
    I have an application that has some graphics. The graphics load very slowly. It doesn't even seem like it caches anything to make it go faster the second time around. I understand that image size and resolution have something to do with it, but these are pretty small gif files for a header image.
    Is there anything I could check in HTMLDB or the database to make the images load faster? The queries run just fine, but the whole page is slowed down by the images.
    Does using #WORKSPACE_IMAGES# as opposed to #APP_IMAGES# make any difference? I've also checked to make sure that all images are associated with my application, but it doesn't seem to make a difference in speed either.
    Thanks,
    Nora

    IMHO, I think that the way you store BLOB is bad.
    Try to create LOB table like:
    CREATE TABLE LOBS (
      ID     INTEGER,
      NAME  VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
      TYPE    VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
      MY_LOB  BLOB
    TABLESPACE USERS
    PCTUSED    0
    PCTFREE    10
    INITRANS   1
    MAXTRANS   255
    STORAGE    (
                INITIAL          64K
                MINEXTENTS       1
                MAXEXTENTS       2147483645
                PCTINCREASE      0
                BUFFER_POOL      DEFAULT
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    LOB (MY_LOB) STORE AS
          ( TABLESPACE LOB_DATA
            DISABLE STORAGE IN ROW
            CHUNK       8192
            PCTVERSION  10
            NOCACHE
            STORAGE    (
                        INITIAL          64K
                        MINEXTENTS       1
                        MAXEXTENTS       2147483645
                        PCTINCREASE      0
                        BUFFER_POOL      DEFAULT
    NOCACHE
    PARALLEL ( DEGREE DEFAULT INSTANCES DEFAULT )<br>
    Look in bold text this is extremly important to have best performance ... place LOB_DATA tablespace on separate disk and if you want to tune to end ... enlarge disk sector size as well as "CHUNK 8192" which is in most cases default.
    Otherway there is no performance problem in this...
    Message was edited by:
    Funky

  • Faster loading of mp3 files

    Hello,
    previous versions of audition used a small file with informations about a mp3 file which was loaded in Audition. Advantage: fast re-opening of this mp3 file.
    Is it possible to have the same behaviour in Audion 3?
    Carlos

    Actually none of the Audition versions work on MP3 files files directly; AA converts the MP3 to a WAV file when it is opened and if you choose to save back to MP3, then AA re-converts the file to MP3. This is a "lossy" compression format and the quality of the stored file will degrade further with each save.
    The "small file" that you speak about is a ".pk" file and is only applicable to 16bit and 32bit WAV files. And yes, Audition 3, like all its' predecessors, support .pk files.
    --Dean

  • Fast load

    Hi,
    I must load millions of records in a table with an XMLType field.
    Using SQL * Loader conventional path to load data and I would like to reduce the time
    loading (several hours to upload a file of 22 GB data per single
    partition in a table that has 10 partitions).
    there is a method to load the data more fast?
    the tables dosn't have XmlSchema, I use bynary xml as storage field
    and I want that the XML data is validated at load time (for these reason I don't use
    direct path)
    my version is as follows:
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    CORE    11.2.0.2.0      Production
    TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - ProductionThanks

    OK, Doing a quick test I see the following issues..
    1. Error Messages are not display correctly
    2. Bad File is not generated correctly
    SQL> host type sqlldr.log
    SQL*Loader: Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production on Mon Nov 29 08:41:37 2010
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.
    Control File:   testcase.ctl
    Data File:      testcase.dat
      Bad File:     testcase.bad
      Discard File:  none specified
    (Allow all discards)
    Number to load: ALL
    Number to skip: 0
    Errors allowed: 50
    Continuation:    none specified
    Path used:      Direct
    Table T1, loaded from every logical record.
    Insert option in effect for this table: APPEND
       Column Name                  Position   Len  Term Encl Datatype
    FILENAME                            FIRST   120           CHARACTER
      (FILLER FIELD)
    XMLDATA                           DERIVED     *  EOF      CHARACTER
        Dynamic LOBFILE.  Filename in field FILENAME
    Parse Error on row 2 in table T1
    OCI-31061: Message 31061 not found;  product=RDBMS; facility=OCI
    ; arguments: [XML event error]
    OCI-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
    In line 1 of orastream:
    LPX-00225: end-element tag "E2" does not match start-element tag "E1"
    The following index(es) on table T1 were processed:
    index SQLLDR.SYS_C0011395 loaded successfully with 2 keys
    Table T1:
      2 Rows successfully loaded.
      1 Row not loaded due to data errors.
      0 Rows not loaded because all WHEN clauses were failed.
      0 Rows not loaded because all fields were null.
    Bind array size not used in direct path.
    Column array  rows :       1
    Stream buffer bytes:  256000
    Read   buffer bytes: 1048576
    Total logical records skipped:          0
    Total logical records read:             3
    Total logical records rejected:         1
    Total logical records discarded:        0
    Total stream buffers loaded by SQL*Loader main thread:        3
    Total stream buffers loaded by SQL*Loader load thread:        0
    Run began on Mon Nov 29 08:41:37 2010
    Run ended on Mon Nov 29 08:41:37 2010
    Elapsed time was:     00:00:00.53
    CPU time was:         00:00:00.02
    SQL> --
    SQL> host type testcase.bad
    The system cannot find the file specified.
    SQL> --
    SQL> quit
    Disconnected from Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64
    bit Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    C:\xdb\bugs\sqlldr>Where as with Conventional load all works as expected
    SQL> host sqlldr -userid=&USERNAME/&PASSWORD -control=testcase.ctl -bad=testcase
    .bad log=sqlldr.log
    SQL*Loader: Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production on Mon Nov 29 08:43:59 2010
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.
    Commit point reached - logical record count 2
    Commit point reached - logical record count 3
    SQL> --
    SQL> host type sqlldr.log
    SQL*Loader: Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production on Mon Nov 29 08:43:59 2010
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.
    Control File:   testcase.ctl
    Data File:      testcase.dat
      Bad File:     testcase.bad
      Discard File:  none specified
    (Allow all discards)
    Number to load: ALL
    Number to skip: 0
    Errors allowed: 50
    Bind array:     64 rows, maximum of 256000 bytes
    Continuation:    none specified
    Path used:      Conventional
    Table T1, loaded from every logical record.
    Insert option in effect for this table: APPEND
       Column Name                  Position   Len  Term Encl Datatype
    FILENAME                            FIRST   120           CHARACTER
      (FILLER FIELD)
    XMLDATA                           DERIVED     *  EOF      CHARACTER
        Dynamic LOBFILE.  Filename in field FILENAME
    Record 2: Rejected - Error on table T1.
    ORA-31061: XDB error: XML event error
    ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
    In line 1 of orastream:
    LPX-00225: end-element tag "E2" does not match start-element tag "E1"
    Table T1:
      2 Rows successfully loaded.
      1 Row not loaded due to data errors.
      0 Rows not loaded because all WHEN clauses were failed.
      0 Rows not loaded because all fields were null.
    Space allocated for bind array:                   8320 bytes(64 rows)
    Read   buffer bytes: 1048576
    Total logical records skipped:          0
    Total logical records read:             3
    Total logical records rejected:         1
    Total logical records discarded:        0
    Run began on Mon Nov 29 08:43:59 2010
    Run ended on Mon Nov 29 08:43:59 2010
    Elapsed time was:     00:00:00.24
    CPU time was:         00:00:00.02
    SQL> --
    SQL> host type testcase.bad
    BADFILE1.xml
    SQL> --
    SQL> quit
    Disconnected from Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64
    bit Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    C:\xdb\bugs\sqlldr>

Maybe you are looking for