FI vs MM report - Stock Values not matching

Dear Experts,
MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
How & where to analysis?
Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
I really appreciate if any one help me
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a h s e k

Hello,
I thought, You can post manually to your stock account.
First you can look the account change history for your stock account. Automatic posting check may be change by someone at past, and after manually posting, check it again.
Z programs which is posting FI document with BAPI, system can not look automatic posting checkbox in FS00. May be Z programs posting to your stock without MM module.
How can you catch this document?
Answer is, please add BKPF-AWTYP field to your FBL3N report.
Call SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Customer Accounts -> Line Items -> Display Line Items -> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
Please add new entry with using BKPF-AWTYP then save this customizing and please run RFPOSXEXTEND report with using SE38 transaction. While running this program, a pop-up appear on your screen, please click "YES" after that program will finish correctly. Then you can see "Reference Transact." field in FBL3N report.
Then list your stock account with using this report and get subtotal for "Reference Transact.". If this field value is MKPF, these postings is coming from MM module. If there is a BKPF or BKPFF value, those are posting manually from FI module.
I hope it helps to you,
Regards,
Burak

Similar Messages

  • MM vs FI report - Stock Values not matching

    Dear Experts,
    MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year. 
    FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes  FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values. 
    The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the  client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
    Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
                           How & where to analysis?
    Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
    Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
    I really appreciate if any one help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k
    Edited by: navahsek on Aug 27, 2009 12:17 PM

    Tthe stock values are matching in the company code level for previous financial year but when checking for few sties, the stock values are not matching.
    For Ex. year 2008 MM Stock values Rs. 10 Lakhs & FI values also same Rs.10 Lakhs for the company code level.
                 If you check the same for few sites( Site1, site2, site3, site4) & same year, the MM & FI values are different.
    I really appreciate if you help in this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k

  • SCCM 2012 R2 - Software metering Reports Parameters Value not appear to choice

    Hello Every Body
    I hope to get answer as soon as possible
    I have SCCM 2012 R2 & SQL Server 2012 SP1, my problem is ( all software metering Reports Parameters Values Not appear so I cannot select
    Note:-
    ( All parameters Available Value set to Get Values From a Query) 

    Has it been over 45 days since you created the active SWM rules? Do all (most) other SWM reports
    work?
    all other reporting in SWM which doesn't ask for month and year working
    only the problem in year & Month Parameters Values
    note:-
    these reports doesn't need a 45 days to work, alwasy when i install SCCM reports working only from the second day of installation

  • Aging report and Control account value not matching

    Hi All
    The value what i am getting from   Vendor liabilities aging and Control account is not matching  for the same dates, all my parameters or selection criteria are same
    Same report if i am taking for the current date it giving correctly,
    If i am trying for a previous day the problem is happening
    How can i solve this issue

    Hi,
    Please check if the transactions are done for different Control Accounts and both the account balances are included in the Aging Report.
    Also, check that ALL the customers/vendor groups are taken.
    Make sure that you are running the backdated aging with the checkbox as mentioned in the Note 800294.
    If still facing problems may be you can provide with more details as to what the control account balances and what is the Aging, difference.
    PS: Check if there is any manual journal entry is created in the control account?
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

    Hi,
    Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
    I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
    Could you suggest on this issue.
    Thank you for your cooperation.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

  • Value not match in KEAT report  with FI

    Hi All,
    I am going through KEAT report, here is saw that the value of one GL Account in FI  value Column does not match with the value  of the same GL in FBL3N.
    Is there is any particular reason as other GL account value matches with the value in FBL3N.
    Regards,
    Shayam

    KEAT shows values posted from the SD module only. If the value is not the same as the account total, then possibly someone has posted to that account directly from FI (TC FB50 or similar). You should be able to find such manually posted documents in FBL3N by looking at fields like "reference" "document type" and such.

  • Service Level Report values not matching to Service Level Dashboard v 2.0 values

    Hi Experts,
    We have installed SLD v2 on a development SQL server along with WSS 3.0. The SLD is pointed to the SCOM datawarehouseDB to collect the information to have it up in the dials.
    We have SCOM 2007 R2 who's OpsMgrDB and OpsMgrDWDB are hosted on a SQL 2008 R2 instance.
    I have created the Distributed application and added 3 Service level Tracking to it. 
    Availibility
    Processor Utilization
    Memory Utilization
    The problem here i am facing is that the values in the dials on the SLD Home sites do not match with the values i get when i run the report for  Service Level Tracking Summary under reporting tab in Ops
    Console.
    What could be probable reason for this ?
    Regards,
    Prajul

    Hello,
    Here are some articles related to this issue. Hope they are helpful.
    Running a Service Level Tracking Report
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212726.aspx
    Generating a Service Level Tracking Report
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd441422.aspx
    The Service Level Tracking Summary Report in System Center Operations Manager 2007 may be empty if TODAY is not selected for the TO date
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2567404/en-us
    Best regards,
    Sophia Sun
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Reports:- Stock,Priod Wise Report, Stock value, Storage Location, WBS Repor

    Dear All,
    Needed some of the Reports in MM Material Mangment
    1. Stock Report  Value Wise
    2. Stock Report  Period Wise
    3. Stock Report Storage Location wise
    4. Stock Report  WBS wise
    5 . Stock Value
    Can I get all my requirement in One Report; or Individually also is fine. Please Do

    Check MC.9
    It will be helpful. you an drill down the report as per your need.
    Regards,
    S Anand

  • Custom report: Machine Name Not Match Serial Number

    What criteria would I use for a custom report that would show computers
    with Machine Names not matching Serial Numbers?

    > What criteria would I use for a custom report that would show computers
    > with Machine Names not matching Serial Numbers?
    Don't really see an easy way to do that. You don't get an option to say
    machine name not= to serial number or visa versa. The only thing I can
    see to do is create a basic workstation report and display machine name
    and serial number and do a side by side comparison.

  • WM stock does not match IM stock

    I got a case and would like to seek advice. 
    I got a storage location 0010 not managed by WM previously but with stock.
    Later, user request to manage the location with WM. I forgot to clear the stock before the customizing.
    Now after the transportation and quite a lot of transactions has been done,  IM stock doesn't match the WM stock. Example Material A in IM is 2 pcs but 0 in WM. For others maybe 0 in IM but -3 in WM.
    Is there any way to match the IM and WM stock again?
    Thanks a lot.
    Kevin

    When you make an IM relevant storage location into a Warehouse, you need to initially upload data into the WM system only then will it be visible as your WM stock. you can do that via tcode LT01 ( create TO manually) and movement type 561.
    If the volume of data is huge you can create an LSMW or ABAP upload for this tcode.
    Hope this helps.
    Warm regards.
    Osayed Rehman
    Siemens

  • PO & Invoice Value Not Matching during  Intercompany STO

    Dear MM Gurus,
    Need your input for the below issue.
    The MRP(Max Retail Price) in PO is being picked from the supplier region and in Invoice
    the MRP(Max Retail Price) is picked from the customer region. Due to this the values from
    PO to Invoice do not match.
    In actual, the PO ZMRP (Max Retail Price)and ZMAR(Margin Price) needs to be picked from the customer
    region instead from the supplier region.
    Whether the above condition is possible?
    If yes pl suggest a solution

    hi,
    Seems you have defined you own conditions ZMRP and ZMAR in pricing schema.
    Check the access sequence for the condition type, which could give the idea on how to maintain.
    harish

  • ITunes U raw reports - storefronts do not match real geo location

    Hello,
    in iTunes U raw reports the storefronts do not match real geo location.
    I've made some tests choosing different country stores in iTunes client instead of the real one where I'm geographically located.
    Then I preview and download some episodes taking note of my IP (WAN), date and time, actions, client used, episode titles ; then looking in the raw  report for that IP address( I suppose the last two fields are X.X for a privacy reason) , time, actions, client used and episode titles, as expected I've found the storefront I've selected instead of my real geo location.
    This is a correct behavior of the new reporting system, but the problem is that I found in my reports unexpected activities for some countries probably because users choose a different or incorrect iTunes contry store and that could make the reports unreliable if looking for the countries that follow our iTunes U site.
    It would be nice to have the real geographical  location; we are an international scientific and no profit organization, and our mission is to transfer knowledge, and for that reason we would understand which countries follow us.
      Regards,
        Diego

    You are welcome. I'm glad you got it back up.
    (1) You say you did the symbolic link. I will assume this is set correctly; it's very important that it is.
    (2) I don't know what you mean by "Been feeding the [email protected] for several weeks now, 700 emails each day at least." After the initial training period, SpamAssassin doesn't learn from mail it has already processed correctly. At this point, you only need to teach SpamAssassin when it is wrong. [email protected] should only be getting spam that is being passed as clean. Likewise, [email protected] should only be getting legitimate mail that is being flagged as junk. You are redirecting mail to both [email protected] and [email protected] ... right? SpamAssassin needs both.
    (3) Next, as I said before, you need to implement those "Frontline spam defense for Mac OS X Server." Once you have that done and issue "postfix reload" you can look at your SMTP log in Server Admin and watch as Postfix blocks one piece of junk mail after another. It's kind of cool.
    (4) Add some SARE rules:
    Visit http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm and download the following rules:
    70sareadult.cf
    70saregenlsubj0.cf
    70sareheader0.cf
    70sarehtml0.cf
    70sareobfu0.cf
    70sareoem.cf
    70sarespoof.cf
    70sarestocks.cf
    70sareunsub.cf
    72sare_redirectpost
    Visit http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm and download the following rules:
    backhair.cf
    bogus-virus-warnings.cf
    chickenpox.cf
    weeds.cf
    Copy these rules to /etc/mail/spamassassin/
    Then stop and restart mail services.
    There are other things you can do, and you'll find differing opinions about such things. In general, I think implementing the "Frontline spam defense for Mac OS X Server" and adding the SARE rules will help a lot. Good luck!

  • MC.9 Stock value not correct

    Dear Friends
    In  mc.9 stock value is showing different than MMBE stock. What will be the reason?
    Regards,

    In   selection screen please select radio button u201C Current Priceu201D instead of u201C Standardu201D . It will give correct value.
    With regards,
    Ajay

  • Utilization values not matching with g/l accounts

    Hi Mentors
    while I am doing the utilization (J2IUN) FOR the month april my utilization balances not matching with g/l accounts. till the march my balances is tallying.
    why i am not tallying in april. please suggest me.
    thanks in advance
    Laxman

    During utilization, the GL balances are read and shown. Hence there should not be any discrepancy. However, please check the GL transactions for the month of April to find out if any non excise posting (a financial JV, for example) has been entered.
    Regards,
    Aroop

  • COOIS- Report  Grid Value not displaying

    Hi Experts,
                   In COOIS report Prd Order item details , the grid values and stock category are not displaying values. we created the production order with AFS grid but while seeing report of item details the grid values and stock category are showing null values.
    initial screen,
    Report
    but production order contains grid values.
    any one guide me to resolve it.
    Regards,
      Thangam.P
    Message was edited by: Thangam Perumal

    Hi ,
         my requirement is need to show the grid value and stock category of AFS production order based on item details. i think that alv reports is working based on view. it is possible to add  custom view for that report? . if possible mean to any one guide me to fix the problem.
    Regards,
      Thangam.P

Maybe you are looking for

  • My ipod wont start up and wont connect to itunes

    My iPod Touch 4g was jailbroken at ios 5, then I wanted to un-jailbreak it and update to ios 6.1.3. So without connecting to iTunes I just tapped software update in settings and about halfway trought downloading it shut down and rebooted, 10 seconds

  • Password and i-Tunes 7.0 install

    Dont know if anyone can help , but I need to upgrade to i-Tunes 7.0 because I just purchased a new i-Pod 2GB and I cant remember my administrator password and dont have access to my set up disc at the moment. Does anyone know if there is a way round

  • How to do "for each month in 2008 sum amount where category is cash"

    The table format is: Date(MM/DD/YYYY) Amount Description Category Account 01.02.2008 -21000 benzina (C) Calatorii Cash 01.04.2008 -2000 Mancare (C) Calatorii Cash 01.05.2008 -2000 Mancare (C) Comisioane Cash 05.12.2008 4706 diverse (C) Comisioane BT

  • User Authorizations and security

    Hi,      I need to know that , is it required to give <b>SAP_ALL</b> to <b>functional consultants and ABAP developers user id</b> created , or there are some different set of roles to be created. where do I find these security best practices , so tha

  • Anybody familiar with JDOM?

    Hi, I've been using jdom for some time now and I have been having problems with the following: Element root = doc.getRootElement( ); List allChildren = root.getChildren( ); The List returned by the getChildren() call is a java.util.List, an implement