File system full.. swap space limit.

When i try to install Solaris 8x86 i recieve the following error.
warning:/tmp:file system full, swap space limit exeeded
Copying mini-root to local disk. Warning &pci@0,0&pci/ide@7,1&ide@1 ata:
timeout: abort request, target 0 lun 0
retrying command .. done
copying platform specific files .. done , i have a 46 Gb IBM DTLA45 HD
,the solaris partition was set to 12 Gb , swap to 1,2 Gb .
After a while I recieve Warning:/tmp/:file system full,swap space limit exeeded. , Why?
I have already used the 110202 patch for the Harddrive.
How should I solve this?
Thanks
\DJ

Hi,
Are you installing using the Installation CD?
If so, try booting and installing with the Software 1 of 2 CD.
Hope that helps.
Ralph
SUN DTS

Similar Messages

ID 518458 kern.warning /tmp File system Full

ID 518458 kern.warning /tmp File system Full swap spce limit exceeded. Sorry no space to grow stack for PID(in.rshd)
The system is a Netra with 1gb memory and is having 1gb partition for swap and another swap file for 500mb is added still it is going to run out. The system has apache web server running and other java applications.
Any suggestions are welcome
Thanks

thanks for your reply.
d1: Mirror
Submirror 0: d11
State: Okay
Submirror 1: d21
State: Okay
Pass: 1
Read option: roundrobin (default)
Write option: parallel (default)
Size: 30721626 blocks ( 15GB )
System clock frequency: 150 MHz
Memory size: 12288 Megabytes
========================= CPUs ===============================================
Port Run E$ CPU CPU
FRU Name ID MHz MB Impl. Mask
/N0/SB3/P0 12 900 8.0 US-III+ 2.2
/N0/SB3/P1 13 900 8.0 US-III+ 2.2
/N0/SB3/P2 14 900 8.0 US-III+ 2.2
/N0/SB3/P3 15 900 8.0 US-III+ 2.2
/N0/SB5/P0 20 900 8.0 US-III+ 2.3
/N0/SB5/P1 21 900 8.0 US-III+ 2.3
/N0/SB5/P2 22 900 8.0 US-III+ 2.3
/N0/SB5/P3 23 900 8.0 US-III+ 2.3
d1 size is 15GB. and CPU is 8 ea. Memory size is 12GB.
I think that swap device was enough.
thanks in advance,

/dev/root file system full

Hello.
We can't to login to system by telnet, ftp,rlogin, console, because recieved:
<b> messages msgcnt 142 vxfs: mesg 001: vx_nospace - /dev/root file system full (1 block extent) </b>
Instance's of Oracle and SAP are working and we are afraid to reboot server.
We working on HP-UX
is there any solution for this problem?
regards
Denis

Hey Denis
why dont you try to extend your /dev/root File system?
if your files system is already 1005 full and 0 bits space left, then try to move some files to other location where space available and try to extend your files system, that will resolve your space issue.
But one thing I can tell you is there is no harm in deleting core file from /usr/sap/<SID>/<DEVMBG00>/work.
-- Murali.

Root file system full

Hai,
Thanks to ll for their comments.
I am getting frequent root file system full message.
I have been deleting messages,pacct files from /var.
But it still shows the same msg.
But when I am restarting the system again it comes to 85%.
what could be the reason. And why does this happen.where are the files getting created
or added
Thank u very much in anticipation.
sreerama

Also, if you are running with crash dumps enabled check the /var/crash/<hostname> (will only exist if crash dumps are enabled) directory and see if there are any big files in here (vmcore is a bugger), that's usually a good place to check too.

FIle system full

Dear All,
In our one of java based system file system /usr/sap becomes full.
I need to delete some of old files.
I found some old files like .....heapdump1208338.1313527999.phd in following path
/usr/sap/<SID>/JC00/j2ee/cluster/server0
So can i delete it.
Please suggest

Dear satu,
Hope you are doing good.
Please see sap note: 1589548 for the JAVA server filling up and Note 16513 fo the ABAP end:
1589548 - J2EE engine trace files fills up at a rapid pace
and
16513 - File system is full - what do I do?
However, for the heap dump, please check he reason for it, else you will face other occurences later.
If you face the error again, kindly check the below link to generate the heap dump:
SAP Note No. 1004255- How to create a full HPROF heap dump of J2EE Engine
As I am not sure about your OS, I am mentioning all notes:
AIX:     1259465    How to get a heapdump which can by analyzed with MAT
LNX:     1263258    IBM JDK 1.4.2 x86_64: How to get a proper heapdump
AS400:   1267126    IBM i: How to get a heapdump which can by analyzed
Z/OS:    1336952    DB2-z/OS:Creating a heapdump which can be analyzed
HP-UX    1053604    DK heap dump and heap profiling on HP-UX
There is no side effect of the heap dump parameter; it will however write a heap dump, so make sure that there is enough free space on the server. Even if the free space is less, it will not harm the server in any manner; just the dump written
will not be complete. This will hinder the analysis.
More details are available here:
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/f0a5d007-a35f-2a10-da9f-99245623edda&overridelayout=true]
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/java/javaMemoryAnalysis]
Thank you and have a nice day :).
Kind Regards,
Hemanth
SAP AGS
Edited by: Hemanth Kumar on Aug 28, 2011 9:24 PM

Swap space limit exceeded

We come across a problem that the swap space ( 1GB) used up eventually without any warning and that causes the system down.
How can we find out what causes this happen?
We have Oracle 8i server running on this machine (Solaris 7). Does Oracle cause this problem?

I fixed this stupid activity a couple of weeks ago. Since "edd" seemed to be the problem, I found "edd" skulking as "/opt/SUNWssp/bin/edd" and simply chmod'ed it to "000."
"edd" doesn't seem to serve a purpose (except to tie up all your memory), and this solution has fixed the problem. Whatever it is that calls "edd" in the first place, it can't make it run any more! :-)
I suggest using the same procedure... find out what program it is that's consuming all your swap space, and then zap it (if you can afford to not have it available).

[SOLVED] File system exceeds 2 TiB limit

I have a 3TB external HD that I would like to use with Arch, but it error messages that 2 TiB is the limit. Is there no way I can use this HD?
Last edited by porphyry5 (2014-06-11 17:32:28)

rune0077 wrote:I meant when formatting. Fdisk can't format partitions that are larger than 2TB. Basically, you need to use the GPT partitions table instead of the standard MBR if you want partitions on ypur system that is larger than 2.2TB
I use mkfs to format drives, as, for example,
mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb1

FIX FOR: warning:/tmp:file system full

This at least worked for us. We did the install on an intel based clone with 1 IDE 30GB drive, and CD as slave. Use either the install CD or SW 1 CD. When you get to the part that gives you the ability to select your own partitions, simply delete all partitions and select OPTION 4 to save and exit. Then type REBOOT. When the install starts back up, go through it like normal and it will automatically say what it wants to do, just respond YES to all its questions. If you do not know how to get out of the install to get to the FDISK program, simply choose quit during the install process when it wants to format. Then type FORMAT, select the disk (ie. 0), then type FDISK, and follow the instructions I wrote above. Hope this helps, because it really was annoying. I am totally new to Solaris, but you think they would be more help and make it easier to LOAD the thing to help them get better market share, epsecially now...... :-)

It's a status message and not a cause for concern. There's nothing to fix.
(104601)

Weird swap space problem??

what does this mean?
Mar 12 11:02:20 sol10vmware tmpfs: [ID 518458 kern.warning] WARNING: /etc/svc/volatile: File system full, swap space limit exceeded
df -k reveals that swap is only 1% full
# df -k*
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0d0s0 11355557 7132193 4109809 64% /
/devices 0 0 0 0% /devices
ctfs 0 0 0 0% /system/contract
proc 0 0 0 0% /proc
mnttab 0 0 0 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 12640 660 11980 6% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0 0 0 0% /system/object
/usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap1.so.1
11355557 7132193 4109809 64% /lib/libc.so.1
fd 0 0 0 0% /dev/fd
swap 12076 96 11980 1% /tmp
swap 12004 24 11980 1% /var/run
bash-3.00#

But then why would it still be working? I dunno, I still think something else may be going on. However if this is true know where I can get a new 40 gig hard drive the cheapset?

Problem of swap space

when i install the free downloaded solaris 8 for intel on a
machine which has a 7899 card, a 17G hard drive and 1G
RAM, therecome warning saying /temp file system full, swap space limitexceed......no swap space to grow stack...... then the installprocess stopes there. i create a boot partition, a
solaris partition and a swap space of 1G, 5G and 8G
respectively. besides, every time i create partitions and reboot
there will be another small active boot partition. any help will
be appreciated.
thanks
James

Thanks for the quick reply
df -h ( detail)
Filesystem             size   used avail capacity Mounted on
swap                   258G   394M   258G     1%    /tmp
swap                   258G    56K   258G     1%    /var/run
swap                   258G     0K   258G     0%    /dev/vx/dmp
swap                   258G     0K   258G     0%    /dev/vx/rdmp
From the above the allocated size swap is reduced drastically when the issues arise.
There are 57 users connected to the server
the physical memory is 65 GB
( i also checked the note 425207 profile parameter
em/initial_size_MB =8192
ztta/roll_extension           2000683008 Byte

Deleting files, but free disc space doesn't budge

so, I was just cleaning up my harddrive. I just deleted another 2GB and yet.. free disk space did not increase. Not even a tiny bit. What am I missing here? The files were an old project that I moved to an external drive. Yet free disk space is stubbornly remaining at precicely 59.47GB.. Why is this happening to me?... There IS a God, and he hates me?
This is totally baffling..

Linc,
ok, I admit I'm overreacting. However.. I'm read local snapshots start deleting themselves when 80% of the disk is full. I'm a total layperson.. but, maybe that's because HDDs are said to operate best when there's at least 20% free? So if the local snapshots were indeed totally harmless, why would they need to curate themselves this way, why not just fill up ALL the free space, or 99% instead of 80%? I might be mistaken.. but in general, the more free disk space, the better, right? It means less fragmentation and more room for the system and swap space, etc... that is what I meant by cluttering up your drive. Who's to say 30% free wouldn't be better, especially considering that I almost never actually have to use TM.
Yet Apple does not even allow me to turn it off in the TM preferences, forcing power users to resort to terminal workarounds, stranding intermediate users like me since I do not mess with terminal (yes I know I must seem like a n00b but unlike, say, my mom, I can actually grasp most of the concepts invovled and am usually capable of making an informed choice about how I want my own darn computer to handle my own darn files), and of course safely guarding the dumbest...everyone's mom...um..the beginner users from having to understand anything for it to "just work". Gurrrr..

Checking Swap space from OS level in HPUX

Hi All,
We have some issues with swap in our SAP production system when I checked the ST06 Tcode
Swap
Configured swap     Kb    20,971,520     Maximum swap-space Kb    54,389,460
Free in swap-space Kb     8,945,160     Actual swap-space   Kb    54,389,460
And when I checked from the OS level ,it gave me the following result
swapinfo
             Kb      Kb      Kb   PCT START/      Kb
TYPE      AVAIL    USED    FREE USED   LIMIT RESERVE PRI NAME
dev     1048576 658208 390368   63%       0       -    1 /dev/vg00/lvol2
dev     19922944 889824 19033120    4%       0       -    1 /dev/vg00/lvol9
reserve       - 19423488 -19423488
memory 33417940 24781076 8636864   74%
Does it mean that total swap space is (1048576 + 19922944)KB which is 20GB?
If yes ,then how to increase the swap space in UNIX based systems?
SWAP SPACE = 3*RAM? If yes ,do we need to put swap size =60 GB?
In ST06
what is the difference between CONFIGURED SWAP-SPACE and ACTUAL SWAP-SPACE?
Regards,
Prashant
Edited by: Prashant Shukla on Oct 13, 2008 4:21 AM
Edited by: Prashant Shukla on Oct 13, 2008 4:23 AM

Hi,
Thanks for ur reply but when I checked it from OS level why it is showing only 20GB ?
What's the diff between configured and actual swap space ?
I checked SAP Notes :146289 and 153641
They clearly says that swap space should be atleast 20 GB plus 10 GB for additional Instance for the server.
In our landscape we have CI and 4 dialog instance connected to it
that means our swap space should be 20 + 10*4=60 GB
We are having HPUX server and ST06 Swap values are
Swap
Configured swap     Kb    20,971,520   Maximum swap-space Kb    54,389,460
Free in swap-space Kb     8,697,960   Actual swap-space   Kb    54,389,460
Do we need to increase the SWAP Space to increase the system performance?
What is difference between configured swap and actual swap space ?
SAP Note 1112627 clearly says that SWAP SPACE = 2* RAM for HPUX servers.
What do you guys say about this?
Regards,
Prashant
Edited by: Prashant Shukla on Oct 13, 2008 5:15 AM
Edited by: Prashant Shukla on Oct 13, 2008 5:53 AM

OES11 SP2 - Linux File System and NSS Pools & Volumes

Planning to install our first OES11 SP2 server into an existing tree - the
idea is to run this new OES11 server virtualized on VMware ESXi 5.5
The existing tree has two physical NW6.5SP8 servers running eDirectory
Version 8.7.3.10b (NDS Version 10554.64). One of the existing Netware
servers is used for DHCP/DNS, File Sharing from three NSS volumes and
Groupwise 7.0.4 whilst the second server is used for FTP services and
eDirectory redundancy. Ultimately the plan is to have two virtualized OES11
SP2 server with one for file sharing and the other for making the move from
GW7 to GW2012. And we're planning to stick with NSS for file sharing on the
new OES11 SP2 server.
I've come across a couple of posts for earlier versions of OES which
recommended not to put the Linux Native OS File System and NSS storage
pools/volumes on the same hard drive. Apparently the advice was a result of
needing to allow EVMS to manage the drive which could be problemmatic.
I've read the OES11 documentation which says that "The Enterprise Volume
Management System (EVMS) has been deprecated in SLES 11, and is also
deprecated in OES 11. Novell Linux Volume Manager (NLVM) replaces EVMS for
managing NetWare partitions under Novell Storage Services (NSS) pools."
So I'm wondering if there is still a compelling requirement to keep the
Linux Native File System and NSS pools/volumes on separate hard drives or
can they both now safely co-exist on the same drive without causing
headaches or gotchas for the future?
Neil

Hi Willem,
Many thanks for the further reply.
So we can just use the VMWare setup to "split" the one physical drive into
two virtual drives (one for the OS and the second for the pools).
And I've seen posts in other forums about the need for a decent battery
backed cache module for the P410i controller so I'll make sure we get one
(probably 512Mb module + battery).
Can I ask what is the advantage of configuring each VM's virtual disk to run
on it's own virtual SCSI adapter (by setting disk1 to scsi 0:0, disk2 to
scsi 1:0, and so on)?
Cheers,
Neil
>>> On 9/5/14 at 12:56, in message
<[email protected]>,
magic31<[email protected]> wrote:
> HI Niel,
>
> xyzl;2318555 Wrote: >
>> The new installation will run on a Proliant ML350 G6 with P410i>
> controller
>> so we can use the raid capability to create two different logical drives>
> as
>> suggested.
>
> As you will be using ESXi 5.5 as host OS, it's not needed to split
> thehost server storage into two logical drives... unless that's what
> youwant in perspective for "general performance" or redundancy reasons.
> Italso depends on the options that P410i controller has.
>
> On a side note, I'm not too familiar with the P410i controller... domake
> sure you have a decent battery backed cache module installed, asthat will
> greatly help with the disk performance bit.
> If the controller can handle it and the controller can handle it, go
> forraid 10 or raid 50. That might be too big a space penalty but will
> helpwith disk performance.
>
> Once you have your VMware server up and running, you can configure
> thetwo VM's with each two or more drives attached (on for the OS,
> thesecond or others for your pools).
> I usually create a virtual disk per pool+volume set (e.g. DATAPOOL
> &DATAVOLUME on one vm virtual disk, USERPOOL & USER volume on an other
> vmvirtual disk).
> With VMware you can than also configure each VM's virtual disk to run
> onit's own virtual SCSI adapter (bij setting disk1 to scsi 0:0, disk2
> toscsi 1:0, and so on).
>
>
> xyzl;2318555 Wrote: > Do you have any suggestions for the disk space that
> should be reserved> or
>> used for the Linux Native OS File System (/boot, /swap and LVM)?
>>
>
> Here's one thread that might be of interest (there are more
> throughoutthe SLES/OES
>
forums):https://forums.novell.com/showthread...rtitioning-%28
> moving-from-NW%29
>
> I still contently follow the method I choose for back in 2008, justwith
> a little bigger sizing which now is:
>
> On a virtual disk sized 39GB:
>
> primary partition 1: 500 MB /boot , fs type ext2
> primary partition 2: 12GB / (root), fs type ext3
> primary partition 3: 3 GB swap , type swap
>
> primary partition 4: LVM VG-SYSTEM (LVM partition type 8E), takes up
> therest of the disk **
> LVM volume (lv_var): 12 GB /var , fs type ext3
> LVM volume (lv_usr-install): 7GB /usr/install, fs type ext3
> * there's still a little space left in the LVM VG, in case var needs
> toquickly be enlarged
>
> One thing that's different in here vs what I used to do: I replaced
> the/tmp mountpoint with /usr/install
>
> In /usr/install, I place all relevant install files/IOS's
> andinstallation specifics (text files) for the server in question. Keeps
> itall in one neat place imo.
>
> Cheers,
> Willem-- Knowledge Partner (voluntary sysop)
> ---
> If you find a post helpful and are logged into the web interface,
> please show your appreciation and click on the star below it.
>
Thanks!---------------------------------------------------------------------
---magi
> c31's Profile: https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=2303View this
> thread: https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=476852

Mac Windows file system

I have a 500gb external hard drive that I'd like to use on both my mac and pc and I'm not sure what file system to format it in or what program i should use to format it with? I believe Fat 16 or 32, I'm not sure can be formatted with disk utility but there are file size limitations.

Is there a file system with no space limitations?
Every filesystem has some size limit, and FAT32 is the best of those which can be read and written by Mac OS X and Windows out of the box. Third party software is needed to use any of the others.
(49890)

Crystal Reports XI String [255] limit with the File System Data driver...

I was trying to create a Crystal Reports XI report to return security permissions of files and folders. I have been able to successfully connect and return data using the File System Data driver as the Data Source; however the String limit on the ACL NT Security Field is 255 characters. The full string of data to be returned can be much longer than the 255 limit and I cannot find how to manipulate that parameter.
I am currently on Crystals XI and Crystal XI R2 and have applied the latest service packs but still see the issue. My Crystal Reports Database DLL for File System data ( crdb_FileSystem.dll ) is at Product Version 11.5.10.1263.
Is it possible to change string limits when using the File System Data driver as the Data Source? If so, how can that be accomplished. If not, is there another method to retrieve information with the Windows File System Data being the Data Source? Meaning, could I reach my end game objective of reporting on the Windows ACL's with Crystal through another method?

Hello,
This is a known issue. Early versions you could not create folder structures longer than 255 characters. With the updates to the various OS's this is now possible but CR did not allocate the same space required.
It's been tracked as an enhancement - ADAPT01174519 but set for a future release.
There are likely other ways of getting the info and then putting it into an Excel file format and using that as the data source.
I did a Google search and found this option: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/16772-45-display-explorer-folders-tree-structure-export-excel
There are tools out there to do this kind of thing....
Thank you
Don
Note the reference to msls.exe appears to be a trojan: http://www.greatis.com/appdata/d/m/msls.exe.htm so don't install it.
Edited by: Don Williams on Mar 19, 2010 8:45 AM

File system full.. swap space limit.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for