File to File ------ Message getting stuck in Integration Engine

Hi All,
I have a small issue in file to file scenario .
Once I send the file .Its getting picked up from the source directory but its not getting delivered to the destination directory.
When I check in SXMB_MONI ,message is successfully processed.
Now when I check in RWB. In Message monitring, In adapter engine its showing successful.
but for Integration engine its showing "To be delivered".
I am not able to understand the reason for this. Whether the issue is with configuration of the scenario or some other issues.
So please help me out......
Thanks,
Rohit

Hi,
Make sure you have set the MaxThreadCount parameter to 350 or higher depending of the case and of the resources available.
To increase the parameter, please follow the instructions below:
1. In the left frame choose Server -> Kernel -> ApplicationThreadManager
2. In the tab Display Configuration (right frame) choose Switch between view and edit mode to activate the edit mode.
3. The parameter MaxThreadCount must be set to 350.
4. You will then need to restart the J2ee
For reference see note #937159 - XI Adapter Engine is stuck
For specific setting to an adapter can be done by going to the Visual Administrator -> Services -> SAP XI AF Messaging
Look at the property 'Messaging connections' here you will see the following queues:
Send.maxConsumers (asynchronous sending - outbound)
Recv.maxConsumers (asynchronous receipt - inbound)
Call.maxConsumers (synchronous sending - outbound)
Rqst.maxConsumers (synchronous receipt - inbound)
Depending on where the bottleneck is occurring (i.e. too many entries in the Send.maxConsumers) you can increase these parameters.
Example of parameter value syntax (sample for FILE adapter):
(name=FILE_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System, Send.maxConsumers=10, Recv.maxConsumers=10, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)
For reference see note:
#791655 - Documentation of the XI Messaging System Service Properties
And see the link:
/people/kenny.scott/blog/2007/08/20/messaging-system-queue-properties-after-xi-30-sp19-xi-70sp11
Regards,
Caio Cagnani

Similar Messages

Message getting stuck in XBQO queue - Time limit exceeded

Hi All,
We have a BPM scenario in our project (on PI 7.0 SP18), where bundle of PEXR2002 Payment IDocs are received as a single flat file. This file is then consumed by the BPM, to split the message into multiple payments using Java Mapping.
However, when we get an IDoc file of size greater than 5 MB (more than 500 IDocs), the message gets stuck in XBQO queue and eventually giving a SYSFAIL with the message "Time limit exceeded". Could you please let us know if you have encountered a similar issue and are aware of a possible solution.
Any pointers to this will be really appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
ROSIE SASIDHARAN

H Rosie,
1) Goto SXMB_ADM-> Integration Engine Configuration->Parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT->possible values 0 - 2,097,151 (KB)
The parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT enables serial processing of messages of a particular size. This applies for messages with the quality of service Exactly Once (EO). If the message is larger than the parameter value, the message is processed in a separate queue.
2) Goto SXMB_ADM-> Integration Engine Configuration->Parameter HTTP_TIMEOUT->possible values n Seconds, where n is a whole number.
The parameter Specifies the timeout for HTTP connections (time between two data packages at line level). This value overrides the system profile parameter icm/server_port_n (for example, icm/server_port_0 : PROT=HTTP, PORT=50044, TIMEOUT=900). If you do not set the parameter HTTP_TIMEOUT or if you set the parameter to 0, then the setting for the system profile parameter is used.
See SAP Note 335162 for sysfail issue....
Hope these will help u....
Regds,
Pinangshuk.

Messages getting stuck in QRFC Queue

Hi,
Today I noticed that a message had gotten stuck with the status "Sheduled for Outbound Processing" (scenario IDOC->XI->File), XI 3.0 SP11.
This in turn had the effect that the whole QRFC queue got stuck, and all following messages got stuck with status "Sheduled".
I had to remove the first message from the queue manually so that XI could start to purge the other messages from the queue.
What could be the reason for the first messages getting stuck with this status ("Sheduled for Outbound Processing")?
The message was very small, just a couple of lines. One thing that comes into mind, is that XI received 4 IDOCS for the same interface, within one second. These 4 messages were assigned to different queues, but one of them got stuck. Could there be problems with XI when several messages arrive on the same interface within a very short time?
Is it possible to use Alerts to detect this kind of problem in the future? As I have understood, Alerts only handle XI "errors", but according to XI, this message did not have an "error status", it just had the status "Sheduled for Outbound processing"..
Thanks for any help,
Hans

Hi,
If the message got struck in Queue, you try to activate the queues in smq2 to reprocess the data instead of deleting it. This is the final solution. But you should able to see a dump in ST22 for this problem.
thanks,
sasi

Messages getting stuck in SMQ2

Messages get stuck in SMQ2 with the Error msg "SQL error on database occurred when accessing a table".
This is happening on PI system 7.11 SP04 with Max DB version 7.7.06.07.
This typically happens when sending messages from one BPM to another although it has more of a random pattern.
A corresponding dump is also seen in ST22.
The dump details are as below:
Runtime error : DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR
Exception : CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
Database error text : Invalid numeric value for parameter/column (10)
Internal call code : "[RSQL/UPDT/SWFRXIHDR ]"
Any help is highly appreciated in resolving this issue.
Regards,
Murali Narayanan

> The dump details are as below:
> Runtime error : DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR
> Exception : CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
> Database error text : Invalid numeric value for parameter/column (10)
I would update the kernel (plus the database interface library lib_dbsl) to the latest patchlevels and try again. If the error persists I'd upgrade the database to the latest patchlevel. If it still doesn't work I'd open an OSS call (BC-DB-SDB).
Markus

Messages getting stuck in tcp_local Channel

Hi All
Version
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004)
libimta.so 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built 12:52:04, Jun 24 2004)
SunOS dakota 5.9 Generic_112233-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
Background
In the last week we've been experiencing problems with outgoing messages getting stuck in our tcp_local channel. They can stay for up to 4 hours before dequeuing. We plan to install Patch 116568 which is the latest core patch for our version of the Messaging Server.
To date we haven't experienced any DNS problems and have not made any configuration changes.
However I was just wondering if anyone had come across this type of problem before? We're hoping the patch will resolve the issue but would be interested in other alternatives.
Thanks in advance
Paul

You'll have to do more research before I can offer help. . .
It's not unusual for some messages to be retried, and depending on the destination, that may take a while.
Some outside domains are always slow. If you have many messages queued for such outside domains, they can involve the whole server, and cause mails to queue up behind them.
Many installations create a new channel, such as, "tcp_slow", and use rewrite rules to move messages addressed to these domains (aol, hotmail, earthlink, etc.) into this separate channel. You can "tune" that channel differently, and messages there won't block tcp_local.

From time to time, my outgoing mail messages get stuck in the "outbox". I'm having trouble resolving the problem.

From time to time, my outgoing mail messages get stuck in the "outbox". I'm having trouble resolving the problem.

I use Comcast. My computer (Mac Air) also uses my iCloud and Me accounts. The message I get back says they are all offline.

Messages gets stuck up in active state

Hi ,
In our production environment, we are facing strange issues for the past 1 week.
Issue 1:
Messages gets stuck up in active state. In our message tracking mechanism ,the status is successfully sent to destination party. The message should not hold up in active state in first place?
If we restart the Host instance, it is creating duplicate and processing it which is creating misssing ICR issue.
Per day message flow-200 messages
Please suggest ?
Kind Regards,
Giri.a
girishkumar.a

Hi Girish,
I believe OFTP adapter is not native adapter(in box) for BizTalk Server.
So, is there any logging mechanism in OFTP adapter?
Also, can we connect to the FTP server using some other tool like Filezilla etc. If other 3rd party products are also not able to connect to this server then we can say that its not a BizTalk issue.
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

Messages got stuck in Adapter engine

We are doing http to RFC sysnchronous scenario
Message got stuck in adapter engine.so we are getting 500 HTTP timeout error in Http client.
Please help us to find why messages got stuck in Adapter engine.
Below Adapter engine audit log message is pasted for your reference.
Audit Log message:
Time Stamp Status Description
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success Message successfully received by messaging system. Profile: XI URL: http://devsap01:51000/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XI Credential (User): PIISUSER
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success Using connection RFC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Trying to put the message into the request queue.
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success Message successfully put into the queue.
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success The message was successfully retrieved from the request queue.
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success The message status set to DLNG.
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success Delivering to channel: RFC_out_Test
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success MP: entering
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success MP: processing local module localejbs/RfcAFBean
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success RFC adapter received a synchronous message. Attempting to send sRFC for ZFTestRFC
26.09.2008 06:33:54 Success RFC adapter received a synchronous message. Attempting to send sRFC for J2EE_GUEST
ime Stamp Status Description
26.09.2008 06:56:15 Success MP: leaving
26.09.2008 06:56:15 Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection RFC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.MessageExpiredException: Sync application request expired.. Setting message to status failed.
26.09.2008 06:56:15 Error The message status set to FAIL.
26.09.2008 06:56:15 Error Returning synchronous error message to calling application: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.MessageExpiredException: Sync application request expired..
Kindly advise us on this issue.

Hi krish,
when i send a http request it got stuck in adapter engine with status "delivering" for some time....
We found that RFC got successfully executed in R/3 system but the synchronous message is not delivered to PI.since adapter engine message is having status "delivering"
after some time we got adapter engine message status as "cancelled with error"
Error is Message expired exception which you can see audit log message I have pasted in my previous post.
Meanwhile we also got HTTP timeout error in Http client.
Could you please tell me why it got stuck in Adapter engine with status "delivering" since RFC is executed successfully.
Why we are not getting synchronous message reply back to PI?

Insert pdf file into another pdf file keeps getting stuck

I am trying to insert a 5 page pdf file into another pdf file (both unsecured) and it keeps getting stuck at about 71%* conplete. I can't even get the file to show up on the screen so i can close it. Help?

I have tried several different files, and get the same phenomenon with each one –
1.     I open an acrobat file.
2.     I open a WORD file.
3.     I copy a sentence from WORD to the clipboard.
4.     I click on View in Acrobat, Tools, Pages, other options, insert from clipboard.
5.     Acrobat shows that it is copying, and when it gets to 67% it stops and runs and runs and then only way I can stop it is to go to the task manager and end task.
I tried refrying with a file and that didn’t work, and I can’t imagine that Acrobat was designed so that each time I try to insert from WORD I would have to refry (even if it did work).
Please help!
Thank you
Shirah
Moadim LeSimcha, times of joy!

Message stuck in Integration engine

Hi,
I have a very simple file to file scenerio.
I am sending a file from SAP system to Non Sap system and archiving the file later.
My file is getting archived but its not reaching the destination.
When I check it in the Run time workbench, it says WAITING status in Integration engine.
I don't know why it is taking so long, my polling interval is 10 mins.
And in SXMB_MONI it says that it is in the queue.
Regards,
Lokesh

but in smq2 my queue XBTO2___0000 has 643 enteries and its in a running state for really long time.
If not production, then delete the first message in the queue (if it is not getting re-processed)
For DEV/ TEST encironment you can even delete the queue, if the stuck messages can be ignored (not to be processed).
Regards,
Abhishek.

Messages getting scheduled in SAP ECC Box:Messages getting stuck in Inbound

The scenario is -
JDBC Sender-->> SAP PI-->> ECC Server(via ABAP proxy)
The Interface is running properly in SAP PI & then the messages are getting posted to the Inbound queues in SAP ECC Box. Generally it takes few seconds for the messages to get processed, but now all are getting scheduled in the Inbound queues(in different channels as seen in SMQ2)
We re-ran the interfaces again a few times, but all of them kept getting scheduled. Finally, after 2 hours one of the messages got processed. I suppose we won't face any problem now onwards.
Though I can see several suggestions like registering the queues & assigning dedicated queues to the interface, none of the blog suggest the probable cause of the event?
Can this be due to some issue in the server(heavy pressure of data in the server during the period/issue in the queues??)
I found the following links regarding issues like these --
XML file getting stucked in queue in ECC
Message in scheduled state
Thanks

Is the printing issue with one specific printer or across system.
What method you have configured for output device.
There should be any issue if you add spool work process to Application server.
Then you should be able to configure spool server load balancing. (Search on help.sap.com for spool load balancing)

JMS Messages getting stuck in queues

Hi,
I am facing this peculiar issue with queue messages not getting picked up.
Application Architecture: There is 1 JMS queue ( which resides in WLDomain1 with in a Unix Box) and there are 2 windows boxes having 2 weblogic domains each with 3 instances of MDB deployed on each of the domains. So total of 12 consumers (2 Box * 2 Domain * 3 Instances of MDB) listens to the JMS queue.
Issue: After bringing everything up I am able to see 12 consumer count listening to the queue. But when I run the application which writes total of 13 messages in the queue only 7 of them are getting processed and 6 messages are always getting stuck in the queues. Interestingly this 7 messages are mostly getting processed by consumers with in the same windows box. And the selection of windows box is completely random. To confirm whether both the windows boxes are configured fine I tried to test them individually and it works fine individually, the problem happens only if I bring up both the boxes together.
Another observation is, if I bring down the non working domains, the pending messages start getting processed by the working domains. It gives an impression that the non working domains seem to lock the messages for processing but doesn't actually process it. Only when I bring down the domains it releases this lock.
Below is the JMS Life cycle events I captured from log files :
1. Start domain1 in WIN Box1
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040304> <783400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040309> <239900> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:00 PM CST> <> <> <1259114040313> <2100> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <> <>
2. Start domain2 in WIN Box 1
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095403> <38600> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095407> <335400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:54:55 PM CST> <> <> <1259114095410> <997700> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <> <>
3. Start domain1 in WIN Box 2
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172061> <316500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session80.consumer82)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172066> <324300> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session83.consumer85)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114172072> <757000> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session86.consumer88)> <> <>
4. Start domain2 in WIN Box 2
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214000> <142800> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session90.consumer92)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214005> <38200> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session93.consumer95)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 7:56:54 PM CST> <> <> <1259114214009> <22400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerCreate> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session96.consumer98)> <> <>
At this point console shows 12 consumers listening the queue which is absolutely fine.
5. Run application
--Message Production
This produces 13 messages ( I have not pasted the complete log)
-- Message Consumption ( Only 7 messages are consumed)
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:05 PM CST> <> <> <1259114405953> <576400> <ID:<1047832.1259114392542.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114392542</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410091> <310100> <ID:<1047832.1259114393181.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393181</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410130> <364600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400626.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400626</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410134> <540700> <ID:<1047832.1259114393125.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393125</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:10 PM CST> <> <> <1259114410137> <632400> <ID:<1047832.1259114393128.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393128</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:12 PM CST> <> <> <1259114412026> <984200> <ID:<1047832.1259114393123.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114393123</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:00:16 PM CST> <> <> <1259114416045> <41800> <ID:<1047832.1259114400005.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400005</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
6. At this point Admin Consol shows 6 messages pending in the queue
and From consumer numbers it is evident that consumers in WIN Box2 domains have not processed any messages
Now if I stop server in WIN Box2 Domain1, WIN Box1 picks up the messages instantely
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202343> <897600> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session80.consumer82)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202346> <421900> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session83.consumer85)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:22 PM CST> <> <> <1259115202379> <582300> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection79.session86.consumer88)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:24 PM CST> <> <> <1259115204888> <4600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400029.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session76.consumer78)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400029</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:32 PM CST> <> <> <1259115212820> <256700> <ID:<1047832.1259114400258.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session66.consumer68)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400258</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:13:43 PM CST> <> <> <1259115223579> <280600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400032.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session60.consumer62)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400032</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
7. At this poing Admin Consol shows 3 messages pending in the queue
Now if I stop server in WIN Box2 Domain2, the remaining 3 gets processed
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:08 PM CST> <> <> <1259115368998> <193400> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session90.consumer92)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:08 PM CST> <> <> <1259115369000> <885500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session93.consumer95)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:09 PM CST> <> <> <1259115369002> <902500> <> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <ConsumerDestroy> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX2>):OAMI(server.jms.connection89.session96.consumer98)> <> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:25 PM CST> <> <> <1259115385151> <123700> <ID:<1047832.1259114400324.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session70.consumer72)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400324</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:29 PM CST> <> <> <1259115389660> <836600> <ID:<1047832.1259114400535.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection59.session63.consumer65)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400535</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
####<Nov 24, 2009 8:16:37 PM CST> <> <> <1259115397823> <610200> <ID:<1047832.1259114400432.0>> <> <JMSModule!Queue> <Consumed> <<anonymous>> <MC:CA(/<IP_BOX1>):OAMI(server.jms.connection69.session73.consumer75)> <<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mes:WLJMSMessage xmlns:mes="http://www.bea.com/WLS/JMS/Message"><mes:Header><mes:JMSTimestamp>1259114400432</mes:JMSTimestamp><mes:Properties/></mes:Header></mes:WLJMSMessage>> <>
Kindly throw some light on this issue. Also do let me know if you need any more specific details about this.
Thanks,
Abhijeet
Edited by: user5240164 on Nov 25, 2009 11:35 AM
Edited by: user5240164 on Nov 28, 2009 1:21 PM

Hi,
The problem may be conflicting names in your configuration. To ensure proper operation of WL Security, JMS, JTA, and JDBC, make sure that (A) each domain has a unique name, and (B) no two WebLogic servers have the same name (even if in two different domains).
To ensure a more even distribution of messages, either simply send more than a token amount messages (eg, a hundred or so, rather than just 12), or configure a custom connection factory on the domain that hosts the queue, reduce MessagesMaximum on the connection factory to 1, and then modify each MDB to refer to the custom connection factory. The MessagesMaximum setting controls the number of messages that can be pre-pushed (pipelined) to a single asynchronous consumer.
For more information see "Best Practices for JMS Beginners and Advanced Users" in the latest versions of the JMS admin guide, and "JMS Performance & Tuning Check List" in the WebLogic Performance and Tuning guide.
Tom

Messages getting stuck in Queue

Hi All,
In my scenario data is coming from database into XI and creating a file in SAP. The messages are getting stuck in the Queue and in message monitoring the status is showing as 'waiting'. Earlier the messages were getting successfully processed but system was running slow for the past two days. Is this because of system speed or some data issue?
For testing pupose I have deleted the old messages from Smq2 and tried but every new message is getting stuck in the queue. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Aparna

Please check the following blog :
/people/stefan.grube/blog/2006/04/27/how-to-deal-with-stuck-eoio-messages-in-the-xi-30-adapter-framework
try cancelling oldest messages, this should unblock queue
Regards,
Jamal

Email messages getting stuck in Outbox

I have regular problems with my sent emails getting stuck in my Outbox when using verizon.net mail. The problem only occurs with verizon.net and only on my tablet (Nexus 7), not on my PC. Both are on same wireless network so I don't think it is due to interruption in connection. Is there some adjustment I need to make?

Gmail is a deliberately broken implementation of IMAP that often causes problems with Mail. The problem seems to have gotten worse in Mavericks. Google has no incentive to make Gmail work well with any mail client, because the company makes money by delivering targeted ads via the Web. The Gmail servers analyze your messages to gather information about you and your contacts that Google can then sell to marketers, or to anyone who will pay for it. You agreed to those terms when you registered a Gmail address. The marketers—not Gmail users—are Google's customers and the ones it aims to please.
I suggest either not to use Gmail at all, or to access it through the website as Google intends. You might get better results with another email client. I don't recommend any one in particular.
If you insist on trying to make Gmail work with Mail, the following links may help:
Configuring OS X Mail For Gmail Without Duplicates
Setting up Apple Mail to Rock and Roll with Gmail
Apple Mail and Gmail Part Deux

Messages getting stuck at the end of sending

I have an iPhone 5 running iOS 6.0.1 and often my text messages will get stuck at the end of the sending progress bar. Like this: http://i.imgur.com/iqxjo.jpg It'll slowly progress towards that point and then it'll just stop. It will sit there anytime from a few seconds to a few minutes. It usually happens to regular texts, but it occurs with iMessages occasionally too. I can assure you it's my coverage/Internet connection is fine when this occurs. I've contacted Verizon Wireless and they've done countless troubleshooting such as resetting things on their end, sending me a new iPhone, SIM card, etc. I've done restores, I've used it without restoring form a backup, on a new phone, etc. and it continues. This problem has NEVER occurred before I got my iPhone 5 running iOS 6. iOS 6.0.1 didn't fix anything. Considering iMessage is doing it too, I'm beginning to believe it's a glitch in iOS or the new iPhone. Please help, this is a really annoying bug and anything would help. Is anybody else having this issue? Thanks!

I have solved it by this steps:
1-I have removed the current iTunes(version 10.4.1)
2-I have downloaded the iTunes from apple sites and installed
3-after the installing process finished I want to the iTunes properties and the compatibility tab and marked 'Run as administrator'
4-I lunched the iTunes and gone through the security question and after that plugged in the iPhone and successfully restored it

File to File ------ Message getting stuck in Integration Engine

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for