File version is later than the current LabView version

I have LabView 2010 and I need to use an instrument driver that was written in LabView 2012.
Is there any way I can get this driver to work with 2010?

As SnowMule said, post the library in the Version Conversion board as a zip file. State the current version and what version you need. Then be patient. One of us will take care of it when we find the time.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions

Similar Messages

What sqlite version is used in the current AIR versions?

What sqlite version is used in the current Adobe AIR versions? Is there a possibility to get the sqlite version number which is used in current adobe air version?
I want to know if sqlite supports "locking" in Adobe AIR. I want to use one sqlite database file on a server and multiple clients should have access to the file (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE).

http://forums.adobe.com/message/3586411
2.6 use 3.6.16. It's not visible in the public doc

Lvwutil32 version too early to covert to current LabVIEW version?

Hi all,
I am looking to control the windows panel with some of the useful vis stored inside the lvwutil32 lib. However when I tried to open the vis inside the library, an error message saying that the vi version (4.0) is too early to be converted to my current LabVIEW version (8.5.1).
Is there anyway to reconvert the vi that my current LabVIEW can use? It is a great shame as from the readme that comes with the lvwutil32, it seems that there are a lot of useful vis that I would find very useful for my projects.
Hope someone could provide some help on this. Thanks!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

                       Hello,
                       I am having the same problem as YuanGe(the topic owner). I wanna open a file from the 5.1.1 LABview version on my LABview 8.6 and occurs the same error message.
                      I would be very grateful, if anybody could help me.
                      Thanks.
                      ps: The file is just down here.
Attachments:
ag8614x.zip ‏2795 KB

This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded

Hello,
When trying to register a custom data flow component (.dll file) to the Global Assembly Cache. I received the following message:
Failure adding assembly to the cache: This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded.
I think that the problem lies with .NET version (as described in different forums). However the target framework of my project is .NET framework 4 (assembly built by runtime). Where can I see what the currently loaded runtime is?
Regards,
Eddy

Hi Eddy,
You are right. It is caused by that .Net framework 4 is not installed in the server. Please check the installed versions by the following article:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh925568(v=vs.110).aspx
If the .Net framework 4 is not installed, please install it at first.
In addition, this issue sounds to be a .Net development related issue. Could you please post it in the appropriate forum in the future.
Thanks,
Jinchun Chen

Running a java program in a directory other than the current directory

How do I run a java program that's located in a directory other than the current directory?
There is a file Test.java in /dir1/subdir1. If my current directory is anywhere other than that directory, say /dir2/subdir2, I can compile Test.java by using:
javac -classpath /dir1/subdir1 /dir1/subdir1/Test.java
But when I try to run it with:
java -classpath /dir1/subdir1 /dir1/subdir1/Test
I get a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: \dir1\subdir1\Test
Any thoughts?

You need to specify just the name of the class you want to run. So java -classpath /dir1/subdir1 Test

Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version , SQL Server Extended Events , Optimizing Reading from XML column datatype

Team , Thanks for looking into this ..
As a last resort on optimizing my stored procedure ( Below ) i wanted to create a Selective XML index ( Normal XML indexes doesn't seem to be improving performance as needed ) but i keep getting this error within my stored proc . Selective XML
Index feature is not supported for the current database version.. How ever
EXECUTE sys.sp_db_selective_xml_index; return 1 , stating Selective XML Indexes are enabled on my current database .
Is there ANY alternative way i can optimize below stored proc ?
Thanks in advance for your response(s) !
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes] Script Date: 3/11/2015 3:10:42 PM ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- EXEC [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON --Does'nt have impact ( May be this wont on SQL Server Extended events session's being created on Server(s) , DB's )
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
select getdate() as getdate_0
DECLARE @XML XML , @Prev_Insertion_time DATETIME
-- Staging Previous Load time for filtering purpose ( Performance optimize while on insert )
SET @Prev_Insertion_time = (SELECT MAX(EE_Time_Stamp) FROM dbo.MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log ) -- Perf Optimize
-- PRINT '1'
CREATE TABLE #Temp
EventName VARCHAR(100),
Time_Stamp_EE DATETIME,
ObjectName VARCHAR(100),
ObjectType VARCHAR(100),
DbName VARCHAR(100),
ddl_Phase VARCHAR(50),
ClientAppName VARCHAR(2000),
ClientHostName VARCHAR(100),
server_instance_name VARCHAR(100),
ServerPrincipalName VARCHAR(100),
nt_username varchar(100),
SqlText NVARCHAR(MAX)
CREATE TABLE #XML_Hold
ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY , -- PK necessity for Indexing on XML Col
BufferXml XML
select getdate() as getdate_01
INSERT INTO #XML_Hold (BufferXml)
SELECT
CAST(target_data AS XML) AS BufferXml -- Buffer Storage from SQL Extended Event(s) , Looks like there is a limitation with xml size ?? Need to re-search .
FROM sys.dm_xe_session_targets xet
INNER JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions xes
ON xes.address = xet.event_session_address
WHERE xes.name = 'Capture DDL Schema Changes' --Ryelugu : 03/05/2015 Session being created withing SQL Server Extended Events
--RETURN
--SELECT * FROM #XML_Hold
select getdate() as getdate_1
-- 03/10/2015 RYelugu : Error while creating XML Index : Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version
CREATE SELECTIVE XML INDEX SXI_TimeStamp ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml)
FOR
PathTimeStamp ='/RingBufferTarget/event/timestamp' AS XQUERY 'node()'
--RETURN
--CREATE PRIMARY XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_2
-- RYelugu 03/10/2015 -Creating secondary XML index doesnt make significant improvement at Query Optimizer , Instead creation takes more time , Only primary should be good here
--CREATE XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold_values] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index , --There should exists a Primary for a secondary creation
--USING XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold]
---- FOR VALUE
-- --FOR PROPERTY
-- FOR PATH
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_3
--PRINT '2'
-- RETURN
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_3
INSERT INTO #Temp
EventName ,
Time_Stamp_EE ,
ObjectName ,
ObjectType,
DbName ,
ddl_Phase ,
ClientAppName ,
ClientHostName,
server_instance_name,
nt_username,
ServerPrincipalName ,
SqlText
SELECT
p.q.value('@name[1]','varchar(100)') AS eventname,
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') AS timestampvalue,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS objectname,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ObjectType,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="database_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS databasename,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ddl_phase,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clientappname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_hostname"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clienthostname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_instance_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS server_instance_name,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="nt_username"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS nt_username,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_principal_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS serverprincipalname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="sql_text"]/value)[1]','Nvarchar(max)') AS sqltext
FROM #XML_Hold
CROSS APPLY BufferXml.nodes('/RingBufferTarget/event')p(q)
WHERE -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Perf Optimize - Filtering the Buffered XML so as not to lookup at previoulsy loaded records into stage table
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') >= ISNULL(@Prev_Insertion_time ,p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime'))
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') ='Commit' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - Every Event records a begin version and a commit version into Buffer ( XML ) we need the committed version
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'Replication Monitor' --Ryelugu : 03/09/2015 We do not want any records being caprutred by Replication Monitor ??
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_4
-- SELECT * FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT GETDATE()
-- RETURN
-- PRINT '3'
--RETURN
INSERT INTO [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
[UserName]
,[DbName]
,[ObjectName]
,[client_app_name]
,[ClientHostName]
,[ServerName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[Event_Name]
SELECT
CASE WHEN T.nt_username IS NULL OR LEN(T.nt_username) = 0 THEN t.ServerPrincipalName
ELSE T.nt_username
END
,T.DbName
,T.objectname
,T.clientappname
,t.ClientHostName
,T.server_instance_name
,T.sqltext
,T.Time_Stamp_EE
,T.eventname
FROM
#TEMP T
/** -- RYelugu 03/06/2015 - Filters are now being applied directly while retrieving records from BUFFER or on XML
-- Ryelugu 03/15/2015 - More filters are likely to be added on further testing
WHERE ddl_Phase ='Commit'
AND ObjectType <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND ObjectName NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND T.Time_Stamp_EE >= @Prev_Insertion_time --Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Performance Optimize
AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log] MN
WHERE MN.[ServerName] = T.server_instance_name -- Ryelugu Server Name needes to be added on to to xml ( Events in session )
AND MN.[DbName] = T.DbName
AND MN.[Event_Name] = T.EventName
AND MN.[ObjectName]= T.ObjectName
AND MN.[EE_Time_Stamp] = T.Time_Stamp_EE
AND MN.[SQL_TEXT] =T.SqlText -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 This is a comparision Metric as well , But needs to decide on
-- Peformance Factor here , Will take advise from Lance if comparision on varchar(max) is a vital idea
--SELECT GETDATE()
--PRINT '4'
--RETURN
SELECT
top 100
[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[ServerName]
,[DbName]
,[Event_Name]
,[ObjectName]
,[UserName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[client_app_name]
,[Created_Date]
,[ClientHostName]
FROM
[dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
ORDER BY [EE_Time_Stamp] desc
-- select getdate()
-- ** DELETE EVENTS after logging into Physical table
-- NEED TO Identify if this @XML can be updated into physical system table such that previously loaded events are left untoched
-- SET @XML.modify('delete /event/class/.[@timestamp="2015-03-06T13:01:19.020Z"]')
-- SELECT @XML
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_5
END
GO
Rajkumar Yelugu

@@Version : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5058.0 (X64)
   May 14 2014 18:34:29
   Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
   Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
(1 row(s) affected)
Compatibility level is set to 110 .
One of the limitation states - XML columns with a depth of more than 128 nested nodes
How do i verify this ? Thanks .
Rajkumar Yelugu

When i try to update software for my 3rd Gen iPod Touch to version 5 i get the message 'This version of iTunes (9.2.1) is the current version'. My Mac OS is 10.4.11. How can I update the iPod software?

When i try to update the software for my 3rd Gen iPod Touch to version 5 i get the message 'This version of iTunes (9.2.1) is the current version'. My Mac OS is 10.4.11. How can I update the iPod software?

The later iOSs requires at least OSX 10.5.8 for the Mac. You need iTunes 10.5 but 10.4.11 only goes to 9.x.. 10.5.8 is a paid upgrade.
Are you sure that you have a 3G iPod? If it is 8 or 16 GB it is a 2G and those can only go to 4.2.1 (also requires 10.5.8 or later). A 32 GB can be either 2G or 3G. To identify yours:
Apple - Support - Check Your Service and Support Coverage
Identifying iPod models

Acrobat Pro "save as" function in the file menu does not show the current directory of the file

I have installed CC but Acrobat Pro gives me headaches.
The "save as" function in the file menu does not show the current directory of the file but something I have worked on in the past.
It forces me to navigates through my hard disk for this very straightforward thing in normal conditions. I precise: Acrobat is the only software reacting like that.
I use Windows7 professional 64bits.

I use what seems to be the latest version available on the Cloud:
To illustrate my point, I open a directory with explorer and double-click on the only PDF in there:
So here it is, open:
When I do a "Save as", it takes me to a totally different place on the disk!
Very annoying...
Thanks for your time!
JJ

Is it possible to save a pdf to a format of an earlier version of Acrobat than the one I have (i.e. Adobe 5.0 when I am running 6.0)?

Is it possible to save a pdf to a format of an earlier version of Acrobat than the one I have (i.e. Adobe 5.0 when I am running 6.0)?

How would I do it? I am running Adobe Acrobat XI (version 11.0.5). I am using an external software that allows me to upload pdf files, but it asks "Please regenerate the PDF using Acrobat 5.0 or lower"

Does the current WebKit version in Air SDK 3.5 support Uint8Array or any bufferArray stuffs?

Does the current WebKit version in Air SDK 3.5 support Uint8Array or any bufferArray stuffs? If not, is there an alternative or workaround solution so I can reuse some javascript routines that requires bufferArray like Uint8Array...? Thanks in advance.

You needed to use SDK 5.1 or later. AIR uses 6.0 or 6.1 now, so Retina is ok without any special tricks.

Hello, I am running a Mac book pro soft. 10.5.8 version. Since june the current year I did not get any updates for the software or any kinds of other application, in my opinion that's weird for such a company.

Hello, I am running a Mac book pro soft. 10.5.8 version. Since June the current year I did not get any updates for the software or any kinds of the other application, in my opinion that's weird for such a company.
The problem that I have now is with the Iphone 5 which is not supported for the current Itunes and I can not download the Itunes 10.7 version. What I supposed to do in this case because I can not syncronize at all.
Please give me a hand as soon as possible.
Many thanks

Mac OS X 10.5.8 is years old, 3 major versions out-of-date and unsupported at this point. You will never get any further updates for 10.5.8, and more and more applications will stop supporting 10.5.8 as time goes on. As mende1 points out, you can buy Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6), which will let you use your new iPhone with your computer, but you need to make sure your computer's hardware is supported. See the system requirements for Snow Leopard:
http://support.apple.com/kb/SP575
If your computer cannot run Snow Leopard, you will need to either buy a new computer or abandon any thoughts of syncing the iPhone with that computer.
Also, note that you'll get far better integration of your iPhone and your Mac if you're using Lion (Mac OS X 10.7) or Mountain Lion (Mac OS X 10.8), which are required to use iCloud. Of course, the requirements of those systems are even steeper than those of Snow Leopard:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4949
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5444

Is the Gig version really faster than the 100m version !?

I just upgraded my 100 meg AEBS to the new Gig version, and ran a quick n easy benchmark, an rsync -e ssh on a 150 meg file. The server is an iMac connected via gig-e, and the Macbook c2d is connected via 802.11n (reporting a consistant 300 mbps in network utility - about 20 feet from the router, going through 2-4 sheets of drywall). The tests were conducted in my Chicago apartment, with at least 10 detectable 2.4gHz networks, and no 5.8gHz networks that I know of.
The 802.11n 5.8gHz no backwards compatibility was by far the fastest. The fastest test I ran was 11 MBps on the copy, with 802.11a compatibility I believe was around 8, and 2.4ghz + 802.11g compatibility was around 6. I repeated all tests a few times, the results were pretty consistant.
These results suprised me, as I was really hoping for a bit faster. I could get 40 MBps on my Linux file server over gig-e to the iMac in previous tests. Unfortunately that machine is down until I get some replacement parts, so I couldn't use it to test the new AEBS. But I seem to remember getting 11 or 12 MBps with the Linux file server over the old AEBS with 100m and 5.8gHz no backwards compatiblity.
So how much of the performance non-difference is due to the iMac vs Linux file server, or the Gig-E version being no faster than the 100 meg version remains to be seen. I'm curious if anyone else has done tests.
If the router, or this 802.11n implementation is the bottleneck - folks may not want to waste their money upgrading, unless they really want that 4 port (in bridge mode) gig-e switch on the back.
Rob

That is somewhat counterintuitive, as the 802.11n connection speed is reportedly 300 mbps. I understand the implications of protocol overhead, but 70% overhead seems a bit excessive. I guess I'm curious if the bottleneck is:
- in the router backplane
- in the 802.11n protocol
- in apples implementation of 802.11(draft)n
Also - anyone else have actual benchmark data to share?
regards
Rob

Is there a test to verify the current running version of firefox is valid

Is there a web site or application that can verify the running version of Firefox?

See the Help > Troubleshooting Information page.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Using+the+Troubleshooting+Information+page
*Firefox > About Mozilla Firefox
You are currently running Firefox 13.0.1 and that is not the latest Firefox 15.0 release according to the user agent in the system details list.
*Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1
If there are problems with updating then easiest is to download the full version and trash the currently installed version to do a clean install of the new version.
Download a new copy of the Firefox program and save the disk image (dmg) file to the desktop
*Firefox 15.0.x: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
*Trash the current Firefox application (e.g. open the Applications folder in the Finder and drag the Firefox application to the Trash) to do a clean (re-)install
*Install the new version that you have downloaded
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Installing+Firefox+on+Mac
Your profile data is stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder, so you won't lose your bookmarks and other personal data if you uninstall and (re)install Firefox.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

How to find photos which have not been updated to the current Process Version?

How can I search and/or filter to find photos which have not been updated to the current Process Version? I would like to get a list of the photos rather than going through them one by one and looking for the lightening bolt.

Thank you! As my memory fades, it is good to know that my memory is backed up with you and others on this forum!

Labview version 7.1 is too old to convert to current Labview version 8.0

I had developed my Labview code sometime back using LV-7.1 and now I am trying to deploy it on a new PC. The Test Stand version that I have is 3.1. I did everything right and after I installed my deployment package, I get the error that the Labview version 7.1 is too old to convert to current Labview version 8.0.
I am going to look into converting my code using Labview 8.0, but I am puzzled, why would it matter, as am using the same Labview (7.1) and TestStand (3.1) as before, and getting this error? I also installed the old Traditional DAQ drivers (instead of the DAQmx) and so everything is the same except that the PC is new.
Shoab
Attachments:
ErrorMessage.jpg ‏225 KB

Hey Shoab,
Are you getting this when you run the sequence in the Sequence Editor? If so then I would suggest checking the adapter configurations. Go to Configure>>Adapters select LabVIEW and click the Configure.. button. Once in there you can change the run-time engine to 7.1.
Let me know if that helps.
Regards,
jigg
CTA, CLA
teststandhelp.com
~Will work for kudos and/or BBQ~

File version is later than the current LabView version

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for