Filter / Sort by Bit Depth? (16 bit vs 8 bit)

I am looking for a way to use the Filter panel to sort/filter results by bit depth (16 bit vs 8 bit images) - is there a way to do this Bridge CS4? I have looked in every part of the sorting mechnisms and can't find a way. Am I missing something?

Unfortunately there is no such way in the filter panel, it might be a good
feature request, maybe you can add that using the link at the main page on
this forum.
In the meantime there are 2 possible workarounds. Regarding the fact that a
16 bit is twice the size of an 8 bit you might want to use the sort by size
criterion in the Path Bar but when having different source files or layered
files that might not always be sufficient.
If you use the find command (cmd+F / or menu Edit-Find) you can select the
find by bit depth option. Also select the option to equal and use either the
number 8 or 16.
I am looking for a way to use the Filter panel to sort/filter results by bit
depth (16 bit vs 8 bit images) - is there a way to do this Bridge CS4? I have
looked in every part of the sorting mechnisms and can't find a way. Am I
missing something?

Similar Messages

Filter tiffs by bit depth, color space

A way to filter tiffs by 8 vs. 16bit and also color space? If not doable in PS another means of doing it.
Thanks

Not natively. Some plugin maybe?
În data de 15.05.2012 20:12, "B r e t t" <[email protected]> a scris:
Filter tiffs by bit depth, color space created by B r e t t<http://forums.adobe.com/people/Brett>in
Photoshop Lightroom - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4409492#4409492

Should I have installed Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack 64 bit with Ex 2013 SP1?

I have installed Exchange 2013 SP1 on a 2012R2 server, and all went well (I am at early stages of migration).
Following the pre-reqs listed here: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb691354%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx#WS2012
I installed Microsoft Unified Communications Managed API 4.0, Core Runtime 64-bit only.
Since then I have seen other articles suggesting that I install:
Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack 64 bit
Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack SP1 64 bit
Given I didn't notice any errors in the install, do I need to install those filter packs or is that outdated advice?
regards
Roga

Thanks for taking the time to post Ed
I did a bit more research and it appears that there is more than one view on this.
E.G. this blog
Why Exchange 2013 doesn’t need the Microsoft Office Filter Pack says:
"Exchange 2013 swaps MSSearch for the Search Foundation, a component shared with SharePoint 2013. The Search Foundation has no need of the Office Filter Pack because it includes its own filters. Unfortunately, until SP1 came along,
the Exchange 2013 Setup program overlooked this fact and stated that the Office Filter Pack was a prerequisite. Setup would install if the Office Filter Pack was missing, but who’s going to ignore a warning issued by Setup. In any case, that warning seems
to have finally been suppressed."
This blog
Planning and migrating a small organization from Exchange 2007 to 2013 (Part 10) has:
"After choosing the relevant setting needed to begin installation, the Exchange 2013 setup program will now perform readiness checks. Assuming these complete successfully, we'll expect to see just one warning.
This warning relates to the lack of the Office 2010 Filter Packs, which are not required for installation, and are only required to create Transport Rules for OneNote or Publisher files"
And this one
Exchange Server 2013 FAQ: Is the Office Filter Pack Required?
"The Exchange 2013 pre-requisites page on
TechNet, at the time of this writing, does include the Office Filter Packs as a step in the preparation of a server for Exchange 2013. What it doesn’t make clear is that they are not required.
The new Exchange Search already has support for indexing/searching Office file types, as well as a series of other file types including some third party formats such as PDF. You can see a full list
here.
So should you install the Office Filter Pack? If you want to stop seeing that warning message, then yes. If you want to take the approach of only installing required software on your servers, then no. Consider also that installing it means potentially having
to update it later on if there is a bug fix or a security issue."
The final para above is the approach that I have now taken, but if someone can give me a good reason to install office 2010 filter packs on Ex 2013 sp1 I'll revise my view
regards
roga

Tableview Filter/Sort Always open a new window!

Dear experts,
I have came accross a weird problem. When user filter/sort function in a tableview, a new window always display automatically with the result. But the old page does not change accordingly. But when you use filter/sort function in the new window, it's fine.
I think this may because my old window is a ModalDialog window. It was opened using "
javascript:window.showModalDialog". When using filter/sort function, a real window rather than a dialogue appears with the correct result. But this is not what I wanted. I want to display the filter/sort result in the dialogue window, anything could solve this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Sinvaya

The easiest way to open new windows in Finder, Safari and just about any other program in Mac OS X is to use the keyboard shortcut, 'Command' + 'n'

Ps CS6 Problem: Lighting Effects filter quantises 16-bit height-map to 8-bit in a 16-bit document

I've edited this message: one complaint has been removed - it was my mistake - conroy.
Photoshop 13.0.1
OS X 10.6.8
16 bits per channel RGB mode.
The Lighting Effects filter quantises the optional height-map channel to 8 bits, which can result in a very obvious terraced-slopes appearance and moiré.
(Adobe, please do not simply reply with "you should be using 13.0.4" unless that actually fixes the problem.)

Alpha channels are 16-bit in a 16-bit per channel document. As Christoph said, selections are limited to 8-bit, so if you make a channel from a selection then that channel will have 8-bit quantisation.
Here is an example of Lighting Effects filter using a channel containing a 16-bit radial gradient as a height-map, and where the filter is quantising the height values to 8-bit.

Is the Lighting Effects Filter still 32-bit in CS6?

In Photoshop CS4 and CS5, it's a real PIA to have to restart PS in 32-bit mode in order to use the Lighting Effects filter (FILTER>RENDER>LIGHTING EFFECTS). Has this been addressed in CS6? (Still looking for reasons to upgrade.) Thanks.

See this article: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/979969
It focuses on GPU requirements and troubleshooting. The Lighting Effects Gallery depends on the right graphics card and drivers.
Run throught the troubleshooting steps first in order to see what needs to be done.

Using ACR smart filter on 32 bit images

After combining 3 images in HDR pro then opening in Photoshop CC using the ACR smart filter, how do I keep the edits I made when I then flatten the image and convert to 16 bit?
I seem to loose all the edits I made and it just brings up the HDR Pro options.
What is the point of being able to use the ACR smart filter if you then have to start again on a 16 bit version???

I usually save the 32-bit version before flattening and converting to 16-bit. Then you can always go back to the original edits by opening the 32-bit file. But yes, granted, this is a two-step process.
When you are confronted with the HDR dialog again, under "Method," just choose Exposure and Gamma. Then you won't lose all your HDR construction work from before.

ADF Unable to filter / sort date column in table

Hi,
I am using JDeveloper 11.1.1.7.
I have a read only table inside a panel collection. One of the columns in the table is a date field. I have filterable and sortable properties set to true for all columns. Filter and sort property works for all columns expect the date column. The filter and sort options is not even shown for the date field (shown below).
<af:column headerText="#{bindings.ASRTCreateRequestVO1.hints.CreationDate.label}"
                                         id="c7" sortable="true" width="100"
                                         filterable="true">
                                <af:outputText value="#{row.CreationDate}"
                                               id="ot7">
                                  <af:convertDateTime pattern="#{bindings.ASRTCreateRequestVO1.hints.CreationDate.format}"/>
                                </af:outputText>
                              </af:column>
Please let me know if I am missing anything here.
Thanks,
Ashwin

Hi Ashwin,
As mentioned by Timo, for me also the filtering is working as usual.
But while browsing through the ADF UI Guide I came across with below note
If you want to use a component other than an inputText component for your filter (for example, an inputDate component), then instead of setting filterVisible to true, you can add the needed component to the filter facet.
To do so:
1. In the Structure window, right-click the column to be filtered and choose Insert inside af:column > JSF Core > Filter facet.
2. From the Component Palette, drag and drop a component into the facet.
3. Set the value of the component to the corresponding attribute within the FilterableQueryDescriptor class created in Step 1(not above step but you can find it in pg:390). Note that the value must take into account the variable used for the row, for example:
#{af:inputDate label="Select Date" id="name" value="row.filterCriteria.date"}.
This is in the section: 12.5.1 How to Add Filtering to a Table(pg:390).
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Peddi.

Filter/sort approach

we develop intranet application, and on the server side we decided to use CMP entity beans as persistence layer. but we have now some problems how to impement sorting/filtering at client side. for expample you can see a list of cars on page in table with some columns user should have possibility to filter data by one ore more columns filter and also order data by one or more columns. and now i have doubt how to provide this functionality in CMP bean i can't write ejbFind method fort all combinations of criteria and ordering user requested how can this problem be solved reasonably?
to perform filterting and sorting on application level?
to use some proprietary solution? (jboss we use provides dynamic
queries)
or is there any other possibilities???
thanx for any help??
PXP Slovakia s.r.o.
Boris Brinza
IT Developer
Kukuricna 1, 831 03 Bratislava, Slovakia

Hi,
You can avoid multiple database calls by storing the results in a Collection and then use Collections.sort everytime the user wants to reorder the data.
As to where you would keep the collection, it would depend on your architecture. If you had a stateful session bean that was handling the user's requests, that would be a good place. Or you could keep it in the servlet session context (not a good idea if you have a huge collection).
Ta ta,
Jagan.

Schema filter sorting issue

After connecting to EBS database I filtered "Other users" to see only 2 schemas.
The schemas were sorted alphabetically on both sides, which made it easy to select the ones I needed.
After that I tried to modify the filter and this time Available schemas ar not sorted (at least not by name). Displayed schemas ar still sorted.
There is a workaround, however. Just keep pressing the schema name first letter to cycle through all schemas starting with that letter. Or type in full name to jump to it directly.
Pressing [help] brings up error "Cannot find help content...". Which is understandable. :)
Developer version v1215, Windows 2k.

Another workaround is to use >> to shift all users back to Displayed and then << to shift all back to Available and then they will be alphabetic. That should not be the permanent solution - I did log a bug on this.
-- Sharon

Filter sort criteria

Hallo,
in den Spalten des Bibliotheksfilter werden die Filterergebnisse aufsteigend sortiert nach dem Wert auf der rechten Seite
z.B. Dateityp
Dateityp
JPEG
12000
PNG
400
RAW
500
TIFF
600
stattdessen möchte ich gerne eine sortierte, aufsteigende Darstellung wie folgt haben:
Dateityp
PNG
400
RAW
500
TIFF
600
JPEG
12000
Bei der sortiert wird nach der Anzahl der Werte.
Ist das irgendwie möglich gegebenenfalls auch durch ein Plugin.
Wäre für jeden Hinweis/Tipp dankbar.
Anmerkung: Obiges Beispiel macht sicherlich keinen Sinn aber ich habe einen Anwendungsfall mit einem selbst geschriebenen Plugin das MD5 Hash-Codes erzeugt und da macht es durchaus Sinn in Verbindung mit der Suche nach Duplikaten!
Gruß
Christoph

Sorry,
I just realised this is a english forum!
So again:
I like to sort the filter row against the value and not the criteria.
Please see above table e.g.
Is this possible within a plugin?
regards
Christoph

How to Filter & Sort on Cached view object data?

We are using JDeveloper 9.0.3.4 and implemeting a Struts/JSP application that query's via view object on one table. Is it possible to sort and order by on the view object's cached data? How does one do this?
Thanks
Natalie

As for filtering rows, there are two ways:
1. In the VO that's sorting data (in my article), you can add logic to skip unmatching rows in the following methods:
protected boolean hasNextForCollection(Object qc)
protected ViewRowImpl createRowFromResultSet(Object qc, ResultSet resultSet)
2. In the base VO (unsorted), you can apply a RowQualifier. For example,
oracle.jbo.server.RowQualifier rowQual = new oracle.jbo.server.RowQualifier("EmpDeptNum = 20");
myVO.setRowQualifier(rowQual);
Thanks.
Sung

Sample depth 10 bit vs 8 bit

Televsion began processing video digitally with DVE's in the late 70's with such boxes as the Vital Squeezoom and ADO from Ampex, as well as entries from NEC, and so on.
So why the discussion of 8bit vs. 10 bit? a microcosm of links...check out SMPTE's site as well, all the standards mentioned...
http://documentation.apple.com/en/finalcutpro/usermanual/index.html#chapter=C%26 section=11%26tasks=true
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_digital_interface
All of those systems were based on composite Video and processed in parallel chunks of data with luminance and chrominance sampled together. We'd look at it today and say it was one step above VHS! For the time though, it was pretty awesome, though it was maintenance heavy. When SDI was introduced it signalled a paradigm shift in television from slower lower bit rates to a solid 10 bit sample depth...and there were 10 bit systems inbetween which proved the concept.
What was the difference between the 8 bit composite to the 10 bit Component sampling, and why 8 and 10 bit SDI?
Well, there are several differences, but the consumer doesn't see most of them at home. The flavors vary from DVcam to IMX50 and EVERYTHING inbetween, including MP4 on satellite uplinks! There are a myriad of formats, transmission styles, modulation standards and compressions! Which is best?
We've used nearly everything in our own company from FCP Pro to Quantel eQ's in our workflow and recently purchased both Autodesk and Avid components to complement our table of offerings. What does it all mean and how is it useful to the digital offering.
Well, bottom line, mixing and matching creates as many challenges as it does solutions. But it doesn't answer the original question I presented...why 8bit vs 10 bit..is there a difference and why? Where does HD fit in?
if all the variations are limited to SDI and Component video, which is pretty much what our broadcast industry is based on (given that there are internal differences with RED camera RGB, graphics extreme high end renderings and what not), the work flow pretty much standardizes on Y, R-Y, B-Y, video. It's a pretty good flow and it's close to the RGBY premium we all consider the holy grail of video, no matter the resolution.
Green defines both the color and the resolution, so the difference channels of R and B are half sampled to make bandwidth manageable. And that can be losslessly (for the most part) compressed about 6 to 1, as both DVCPro and IMX do it. ProRes follows suit with it HBR compression as does Jpeg 2000.
Mp2 at 100Mbit and MP4 at about 50 Megs follow suit.
But the big question is whether there is ANY difference between 8 bit and 10 bit SDI in these flavors. As an engineer, I can unequivocally say yes. In one simple stroke, and in one sense it boils down to sample depth. And the price is in both the luminance and color. A color difference sample, ie, R-Y/B-Y, is a half sampled signal for each channel of color, since our eyes are not very perceptive to COLOR noise, so the signal is cheated to save money, circuitry, clocks, and so on. Still, if you do get the chance to see a full RED camera- RGBY signal on an OLED monitor, it WILL pop your eyes! and that's an extrapolated stream.
Ten bit sampling (SMPTE 259M) for the SDI-SD signal yields 1024 steps of sampled video for a "one volt" signal. Digitally, it is data which streams at 270Mbits for 10 bits sans audio, 360Mbits with AES audio embedded. For standard def it would look like your average freighter at about 500 mph and if you could deliver it home, it would look pretty good. NOT GOOD ENOUGH!
Eight bit sampling for the same stream yields 256 steps of video for that sample "amplitude". Streams at 143Mbits sans audio and 177 with embedded audio. Roughly a tramp steamer rolling over the waves at about 125MPH...pretty slow these days. An 8bit SDI-SD signal has equivalent chroma sampling to the 10 bit, but not the luminance or bandwidth, and that same principle holds true for HD!
And every other compression, down to DVcam is a compromise off these broadcast studio standards. Take a look at Discovery channel sometime and look at the paint by the numbers skin tones and you'll see what shooting on the cheap gets you!
Now for the super tanker! HD at 1080i, weighs in at a whopping 1.45 Gigs of bandwith! Roughly analogous to half a frame of image from a Canon 5D, HD was still designed for a MINIMUM Screen size of 102"....MOM, try THAT in your living room!
(As a tiny footnote...Canon used the H.264 HD off their 5D and 7D for their theater experience in Vegas, and it was pretty cool)
Here is the nasty that several manufacturers DON"T want you to know. It is the risetime on a digital sample that makes ALL the difference in the world. I spoke the the CEO of AJA while at NAB this year (2011). This is a guy whose been through the ranks as a working stiff in the TV biz. When I asked him about the Kona cards, he latched on to what I was saying very quickly...big smile, connection made! "First time anyone's asked me that" he said..."rise time is really important for HD...and it's because it's so hard to get it and not have all kinds of artifacts"
What he was saying was that if you sample slower, you get less detail, less color, more noise. Yes, Martha, there IS a difference between 8 bit and 10 bit, from old composite TV up to HD!
Color, luminance, detail. If you put crap in, you get crap out. Incidently, the rise times for all these.... 8 bit SDI-SD ~375nanosecods, 10bit SDI-SD 226 nseconds, SDI-HD ~ 157nseconds. The faster you sample, the higher the frequency you can, and the crisper the detail. The deeper you sample, the more steps, less overshoot, and richer color. The difference between a 1940's race car and The 200+mph ones today. design, attention to detail, aerodynamics.

Unfortunately there is no such way in the filter panel, it might be a good
feature request, maybe you can add that using the link at the main page on
this forum.
In the meantime there are 2 possible workarounds. Regarding the fact that a
16 bit is twice the size of an 8 bit you might want to use the sort by size
criterion in the Path Bar but when having different source files or layered
files that might not always be sufficient.
If you use the find command (cmd+F / or menu Edit-Find) you can select the
find by bit depth option. Also select the option to equal and use either the
number 8 or 16.
I am looking for a way to use the Filter panel to sort/filter results by bit
depth (16 bit vs 8 bit images) - is there a way to do this Bridge CS4? I have
looked in every part of the sorting mechnisms and can't find a way. Am I
missing something?

Can filter gallery be used on 16 bit photos

I can't apply filter on 16 bit photos. Must photo be at 8 bit to apply filter gallery effects

Since most filters mess up the color or gradiation of colors, it's really not critical that you use 16 bit. If you want to keep your document in 16bit, you can create a Smart Object of the layer you want to apply a filter to, open the SO and change it to 8 bit, then apply your filter.

Confusion in FILTER and SORT operations in the execution plan

Hi
I have been working on tuning of a sql query:
SELECT SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'C', NVL(TOT_AMT, 0), 0)),
       SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'C', 1, 0)),
       SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'R', NVL(TOT_AMT, 0), 0)),
       SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'R', 1, 0)),
       SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'C', NVL(TOT_AMT, 0), -1 * NVL(TOT_AMT, 0))),
       SUM(1)
     FROM TS_TEST
    WHERE SMY_DT BETWEEN TO_DATE(:1, 'DD-MM-YYYY') AND
       TO_DATE(:1, 'DD-MM-YYYY');Table TS_TEST is range partitioned on smy_dt and there is an index on smy_dt column. Explain plan of the query is:
SQL> explain plan for SELECT SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'C', NVL(TOT_AMT, 0), 0)),
2         SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'C', 1, 0)),
3         SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'R', NVL(TOT_AMT, 0), 0)),
4         SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'R', 1, 0)),
5         SUM(DECODE(CR_FLG, 'C', NVL(TOT_AMT, 0), -1 * NVL(TOT_AMT, 0))),
6         SUM(1)
7    FROM TS_TEST
8   WHERE SMY_DT BETWEEN TO_DATE(:1, 'DD-MM-YYYY') AND
9         TO_DATE(:1, 'DD-MM-YYYY');
Explained.
SQL> @E
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 766961720
| Id | Operation                            | Name                | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                     |     1 |    14 | 15614   (1)| 00:03:08 |       |       |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                      |                     |     1 |    14 |            |             |       |       |
|* 2 |   FILTER                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| T_TEST             | 79772 | 1090K| 15614   (1)| 00:03:08 | ROWID | ROWID |
|* 4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | I_SMY_DT         |   143K|       |   442   (1)| 00:00:06 |       |       |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - filter(TO_DATE(:1,'DD-MM-YYYY')<=TO_DATE(:1,'DD-MM-YYYY'))
   4 - access("SMY_DT">=TO_DATE(:1,'DD-MM-YYYY') AND "SMY_DT"<=TO_DATE(:1,'DD-MM-YYYY'))
17 rows selected.
SQL>I am not able to understand the FILTER & SORT operations. As there is an index on SMY_DT column, so index range scan is fine. But why a FILTER (Step no 2) and SORT (Step no 1) operation after that ?
Oracle version is 10.2.0.3 on AIX 5.3 64 bit.
Any other information required please let me know.
Regards,
Amardeep Sidhu

Sort aggregate tells you that there was performed an aggregate operation which returns one row, in opposite to sort order by or hash group by which indicates you have grouping, and there more than one row can be returned.
SQL> SELECT SUM(comm) FROM emp;
SUM(COMM)
      2200
Plan wykonywania
Plan hash value: 2083865914
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |     2 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 |     2 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP |    14 |    28 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
SQL> SELECT AVG(comm) FROM emp;
AVG(COMM)
       550
Plan wykonywania
Plan hash value: 2083865914
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |     2 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 |     2 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP |    14 |    28 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
SQL> SELECT MIN(comm) FROM emp;
MIN(COMM)
         0
Plan wykonywania
Plan hash value: 2083865914
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |     2 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 |     2 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP |    14 |    28 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
SQL> SELECT deptno, SUM(comm) FROM emp GROUP BY deptno;
    DEPTNO SUM(COMM)
        30       2200
        20
        10
Plan wykonywania
Plan hash value: 4067220884
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     3 |    15 |     4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY     |      |     3 |    15 |     4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP |    14 |    70 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
SQL>Edited by: Łukasz Mastalerz on Jan 14, 2009 11:41 AM

Filter / Sort by Bit Depth? (16 bit vs 8 bit)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for