Font Size Difference between Exe and Labview IDE

I'm stumped on the following issue and surprizinglycan't find any references that are similar on this forum.
I've developed an application which, when built to an Exe, has different font sizes than when executed on the same computer in the Labview Integrated Development Environment.  In each instance the screen resolution is the same.  I've used the "Application Font".  I'm having trouble figuring why the font would render differently in each case.  Of possible signifigance is that I'm running the Exe by simply browsing to the folder where the build procedure drops it instead of building an installation.
I've attached one of the most glaring examples that shows the rendering in each case.
I'm hoping that someone can point me in the right direction to resolve this issue.
Attachments:
Font Differences1.zip ‏1704 KB

Hi Doctor,
two notes:
for the font size differences: I would try to change the font settings
to a more 'specific' font like Arial 14pt. The application font is set
somewhere in an ini-file and the setting may change with the
environment (IDE vs. exe-rt).
for your attachment: please convert pictures to jpg or png. This will
reduce size by orders of magnitude :-) And please crop them, unless you
have a very (VERY) beautiful desktop background picture!
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

Similar Messages

  • Font rendering differences between Xfce and KDE

    Hi,
    I am using both KDE and Xfce (mostly Xfce with KDE apps) and I observed that there is a font rendering difference between Gtk (Xfce) and QT (KDE) apps.
    In both desktop environments I use dejavu sans font, size 9 and I have set RGB subpixel rendering and hinting to full.
    I created some screenshots of dolphin and thunar to illustrate the differences (right click and select view image to see the screenshots in full resolution)
    Can somebody help me to make gtk app fonts to look the same as qt ones? Or at least tell me why there is this difference.
    Thank you.

    I cant tell you why there is a difference, but this page may help you. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_Configuration
    I ended up installing the Ubuntu patched packages in the AUR, but there are different options.

  • Size difference between 60GB and 80GB?

    Is there a size difference between the 60GB and 80GB iPod with videos? I was looking at a Belkin Tunepower power source for my iPod and it said it has sleeves for 30GB and 60GB iPod videos, but I just checked the Apple store and they only sell 30 and 80 gig iPods. Will my 80GB fit the 60GB sleeve?

    Your 80 GB ought to fit the 60 GB case, since the exact dimensions of both iPods are identical:
    60 GB: 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.55 inches
    80 GB: 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.55 inches
    Of course, if you are using a 30 GB, that would be different, since the 30 GB is a little thinner than the 60 and 80 GB models of Fifth Generations.
    -Kylene

  • Font size difference between Dreamweaver, view in Safari and on friend's PC

    In Dreamweaver CS3, I have a table with two cells containing type. In order to get the type to not appear too large, I need to size the type down to 6pt size on screen in Dreamweaver, then it appears like about 10pt normal size text in my Safari browser on a Mac and then it appears too small, but readable and larger than what I am seeing in Dreamweaver on a friend's PC through AOL. This mystifies me as it is only happening on this one page. When I leave the paragraph text at normal size in this table cell it becomes way too large when viewed in the Safari browser, so what I am doing is sizing it down to 40% (miniscule) in dreamweaver so it will come up in the browser as normal paragraph text size.
    Never had this happen before. Any Ideas?
    TIA,
    Ken

    I would strip this site back to basics by removing all font sizes in your CSS.
    Then avoid %.
    Re-build font sizes just using px.
    Don't mix units (ems, % etc) until you have a consistent baseline and reason for doing so..
    Pt is solid and reliable on paper. Px is solid and reliable on screen.

  • Difference between diadem and LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit

    I want to expand LabVIEW's reporting capabilities.  Can someone tell me what the difference is between DIAdem and the LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office.

    Hello Mr Bean,
    There are several major differences between the two solutions. I'll try and outline them as good as I can ...
    The biggest different is that LabVIEW and its toolkits are programming tools and DIAdem is a ready to run application.
    The LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit basically provides an extensive library of VIs that allow you to connect LabVIEW to the MS Office library and create and edit reports in Word and Excel.
    DIAdem is a stand alone application that was designed to post-process data from various sources. The tools included in DIAdem are:
    1. NAVIGATOR: Allows you to import data from files (ASCII, binary, Excel, etc.) as well as DataBases (SQL/ODBC, Citadel, ASAM, etc.). The unique DataPlugin technology available within DIAdem allows you to import vitually and data file by creating a DataPlugin that describes the data format and gets linked to DIAdem. More information at: http://www.ni.com/diadem/dataplugins.htm
    2. VIEW: Graphical and Numerical data inspection tool. Use cursors to zoom and scroll through your data, edit your data graphically and numerically and compare different tests.
    3. ANALYSIS: DIAdem has a wide range of analysis functions, ranging from simple functions like integration and differentiation to FFTs, Order analysis and 3D data analysis.
    4. REPORT: The DIAdem REPORT tool allows you to create reusable report layouts that can contain multiple axis systems (2D, 3D and polar plots) as well as tables (2D and 3D) and variables. The REPORT tool generates templates that can be usedwith multiple data sets due to the inclusion of automatic (or manula if required) scaling as well as extensive use of variables for annotations. Finished reports can be exported to printers, graphics files, the Windows Clipboard, HTML pages and PDF files (PDF writing is build into DIAdem, no extra software required). Using Scripts, it is also possible to create Word, Excel or Powerpoint reports from DIAdem automatically.
    5. SCRIPT: The DIAdem scripting tools allows users to record macros or write scripts that automate complete sequences, for the import of data, via extensive analysis, to creating a publication ready report. Scripts can make reports "intelligent" by modifying the appearance of a report based on the data or calculation results that are going to be displayed in the report.
    I recommend you check out the following link for more information: http://www.ni.com/diadem/
    DIAdem is an extremly powerful tool for report generation. I am leaving to go on a business trip to Asia, but I would be more than happy to give you an Web presentation on DIAdem after I have returned. We could use your data and create a DIAdem report Script together online. My Email address is [email protected] and I will be back the week of Thanksgiving.
          Otmar
    Otmar D. Foehner
    Business Development Manager
    DIAdem and Test Data Management
    National Instruments
    Austin, TX - USA
    "For an optimist the glass is half full, for a pessimist it's half empty, and for an engineer is twice bigger than necessary."

  • Font size changes between Export and Import

    Captivate v5.5
    My office in Germany is translating existing project from English to German.
    They export a slide from v5.5 to be translated (in Word)...make the required translation and then import it back into Captivate v5.5
    Problem is the original font size when exported is Tahoma Regular 11 but when the translated document is imported it arrives back in Captivate as Tahoma Regular 10.
    The font size during and after the translation is Tahoma Regular 11. The change to size 10 is happening during the import into Captivate v5.5
    Any ideas why and how to make sure the font keeps the same size (11 in this case) when imported ?
    Noel

    Auto Rescale Captions in the CP - file
    I always turn it off by default, but turn it on when having to import translated captions:
    Lilybiri

  • Font size problems between Motion and FCP

    I created a custom Final Cut Pro title in Motion. I set the font size to 110 pixels. My custom title works great, with one exception. The 110 pixel font in my custom title doesn't match the size of 110 pixel fonts in other titles. I double checked the font specs between the two titles, and they are identical. But, the font in my custom title is much bigger (view screen shot). How do I fix this?

    Hi Jim,
    I found the problem. When I right click a text template in FCP and select "open in Motion", the template dimensions are 1920p X 1080p. My original custom templates were 1280p X 720p. So, I didn't realize I was toggling between different template sizes.
    Thanks for you input though.

  • Size differences between editable and non-ediatble combo boxes

    Hi
    There seem to be some differences between the sizes of editable and non-editable JComboBox.
    I have two combos one editable and one non-editable.Even though all the constraints(except [x, y], of course) are same for both in gridbaglayout, they are displayed in different sizes.
    Why is it so? and what should I do to display them in same size. I dont want to do trial and error.
    Another related question is, how do I set two editable comboboxes to always have same sizes irrespective of the values are added into it. I am asking this question bcos I have observed that sizes differ between combos when values are added during initialization and when values are added at a later time.
    TIA,
    CA

    Maybe something like this:
    myCombo.addItemListener( new ItemListener() {
    public void itemStateChanged( ItemEvent ie )
        JComboBox combo = (JComboBox)ie.getSource();
        ComboValue selection = (ComboValue)combo.getSelectedItem();
        if( combo.getSelectedItem().equals("edit") )
            combo.setEditable( true );
        else
            combo.setEditable( false );
    }}):(untested code)

  • Size difference between recorded and published?

    I'm launching a custom sized window using javascript for a
    e-learning course that has a nav bar at the bottom (my own, not
    captivate related - including next and back buttons that navigate
    html pages). I'm recording my movies at 790x496. When the .swfs and
    the html outputed by captivate 2 are published it is adding 24
    pixels at the bottom. I'm using a captivate controller but it is at
    the top. If I try and manually go change the html back to my custom
    height the swf displays messed up. Anybody know how to get these 24
    pixels from being reserved/displayed at the bottom by the swf's?
    Just seems wierd to offer the ability to record at a custom
    size but then it automatically adds 24 pixels to the height.

    Hi theconfusedone and welcome to our community
    Hopefully I can help un-confuse you.
    Okay, click Project > Skin... > Borders tab. Note that
    the bottom border is the one selected. Further note the "Width"
    value. These are normally configured with the bottom border enabled
    so that the playback control doesn't cover any part of your
    project. So DE-select the bottom border and RE-select the top. This
    should allow space for your playback control and allow it to
    operate as you want.
    Keep in mind that this also creates an additional .SWF that
    will need to be included in your output. If you want no additional
    .SWF, you may DE-select the "Show borders" check box to force it
    all to be stored in a single .SWF.
    Cheers... Rick

  • Odd size difference between iPhoto and Finder

    I've just noticed something rather odd. In finder my iPhoto Library is calculated at 94.43GB, and yet when i look in the bottom left info window it says 61GB - i've ensured that I have looked at the library as a whole and have emptied trash, but i'm still left with a 30+GB differential.
    Anyone got any thoughts?

    Nothing odd about it.
    The iPhoto Window reports the resulting size of a folder if you exported into it, all the current images, in their current version.
    The Library in the Finder reports the size of the package: All those originals, all those modified photos, the database files, thumbnails, faces thumbnails, caches and various other support files.
    Regards
    TD

  • File size differences between cp3 and cp4

    Hello
    I created a cp file in captivate4 & import audio file (mp3) & published it.
    swf file size was 305kb.
    but when I created this file in cptivate3 & published it swf file size was 260kb.
    why swf file size in cptivate3 less than cptivate4?
    in two sample setting is default.
    Thanks for any help.

    Hello
    I created a cp file in captivate4 & import audio file (mp3) & published it.
    swf file size was 305kb.
    but when I created this file in cptivate3 & published it swf file size was 260kb.
    why swf file size in cptivate3 less than cptivate4?
    in two sample setting is default.
    Thanks for any help.

  • What's the difference between PNG and JPG for exporting .idea files from the Adobe Ideas app?

    What's the difference between PNG and JPG for exporting .idea files from the Adobe Ideas app?
    What situations are better to export to to .PNG or .JPG?
    J

    iPad apps are designed specifically for the iPad and will not run on the iPhone or iPod Touch. iPhone/iPod apps will run on the iPad, but will only take up an iPhone sized portion of the iPad screen (though you get a 2x button which effectively doubles each pixel in both directions so may appear pixelated). There are also 'universal' apps (which have a '+' symbol against them in the store) which have processing in them to recognise the device that they are on and will tailor the display accordingly (so will make use of the iPad's larger screen).

  • Looking for new laptop what are the differences between pro and air? Besides size. Does the air preform like the pro?

    Looking for new laptop what are the differences between pro and air? Besides size. Does the air preform like the pro?

    The NEW macbook Pro and Air are EXTREMELY close in form factor
    The newest macbook Pro is essentially a larger macbook Air with Retina display and options for speed in increasing prices up to an independent graphics and quad core processor.
    both Air and new Pro now have PCIe SSD and permanent RAM.
    The Air is the lightweight portable form factor, fast to boot and shut down, but with longer battery life than any of the macbook pro in 13"
    Now the new macbook Pro and macbook Air are extremely close in form factor and nature.
    both have 802ac wifi
    both have permanent RAM, no superdrive
    both are slim profiles and SSD
    The only real differences now are (in the most expensive Pros) faster processors and quadcore processors and top end model autonomous graphics.
    ....and of course the retina display
    both are now "very good for travel"
    Other than features the form factor of the Air and Pro are VERY close now,....so now its merely a matter of features and price more than anything.
    You need an external HD regardless of what you get for backups etc.   Drop into an Apple store and handle both and make your choice based on features, such as Retina or non-retina, .... both at a distance now look like the same computer.
    The Pro weighs more, ....but nowhere near what it used to just a month ago on the older macbook Pros
    The NEW macbook Pro is a different creature entirely than the older macbook Pro, .....the new Pro is thicker than the Air, but id frankly call the NEWEST Pro a "macbook Air with Retina display" , or
    Maybe a “macbook Air PRO with Retina display” 
    Instead of Air VS Pro now,.....its really a smooth transition from Air to pro without comparing say, 2 different creatures, now its like contrasting a horse from a race horse.
    Either one in 8gig of RAM (preferably)... the 4gig upgrade costs very little,  the I7 you will notice only 15% faster on heavy applications over the I5, and NOTHING on most APPS.....I5 has longer battery life.
    As you see below, the non-Retina 13" AIR is 82% of the Macbook with Retina display in resolution
    there is no magical number of pixels per inch that automatically equates to Retina quality.
    http://www.cultofmac.com/168509/why-you-might-be-disappointed-by-the-resolution- of-those-new-retina-display-macs-feature/
    A huge internal SSD isnt a game changer for anything, you need an external HD anyway
    what you WONT READ on Apple.com etc. is that the larger SSD  are MUCH FASTER due to SSD density
    "The 512GB Samsung SSD found in our 13-inch model offers roughly a 400MB/s increase in write speeds over the 128GB SanDisk/Marvell SSD"
    http://blog.macsales.com/19008-performance-testing-not-all-2013-macbook-air-ssds -are-the-same
    Here is an excellent video comparison between the 11” I5 vs. I7 2013 Macbook Air.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDqJ-on03z4
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/7113/2013-macbook-air-core-i5-4250u-vs-core-i7-465 0u/2
    I5 vs. I7 performance 13” Macbook Air 2013
    Boot performance
    11.7 I5 ……11.4 I7
      Cinebench 
    1.1 I5….1.41 I7
    IMovie Import and Opt.
    6.69 I5….5.35 I7
      IMovie Export 
    10.33 I5…8.20 I7
    Final Cut Pro X
    21.47 I5…17.71 I7
      Adobe Lightroom 3 Export 
    25.8 I5….31.8 I7
    Adobe Photoshop CS5 Performance
    27.3 I5…22.6 I7
    Reviews of the newest Retina 2013 Macbook Pro
    13”
    Digital Trends (13") - http://www.digitaltrends.com/laptop-...h-2013-review/
    LaptopMag (13") - http://www.laptopmag.com/reviews/lap...play-2013.aspx
    Engadget (13") - http://www.engadget.com/2013/10/29/m...-13-inch-2013/
    The Verge (13") - http://www.theverge.com/2013/10/30/5...ay-review-2013
    CNet (13") - http://www.cnet.com/laptops/apple-ma...-35831098.html
    15”
    The Verge (15") - http://www.theverge.com/2013/10/24/5...w-15-inch-2013
    LaptopMag (15") - http://www.laptopmag.com/reviews/lap...inch-2013.aspx
    TechCrunch (15") - http://techcrunch.com/2013/10/25/lat...ok-pro-review/
    CNet (15") - http://www.cnet.com/apple-macbook-pro-with-retina-2013/
    PC Mag (15") - http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2426359,00.asp
    Arstechnica (15") - http://arstechnica.com/apple/2013/10...-pro-reviewed/
    Slashgear (15") - http://www.slashgear.com/macbook-pro...2013-26303163/

  • Difference between logical and virtual terms

    Hello,
    This is not purely oracle question; but in documentation so many times we find 2 terms:
    A. Logical
    B.Virtual.
    So what is the principle difference between logical and virtual? As I know physical is that which I can see and touch; while logical/virtual is that is imaginary. We say tablespace is logical not virtual; while Java Virtual Machine; not Java Logical Machine. So I want to know; what is the principle difference; why two words for an imaginary thing. Before posting question; I searched in google as “Difference between virtual and logical” but I couldn’t found the answer.
    Please quote your comments.
    Thanks & Kind Regards
    Girish Sharma

    Girish,
    I wont say that I am correcting you as this is like that half glass full/empty thing.May be what I see is half empty , you would see the same as half full.
    Well now coming to the explanation.I am saying honestly , I got more confused after reading your definitions.What do you mean by saing that tablespace is not virtual.I see it as purely virtual.We don't say it as virtual tablespace or logical tablespace but it is actualy logical/virtual, having no existance but just the definition right?
    How can you say that the size of virtual is larger than logcial?The size of tablespace is actualy the sum total of size of datafiles.So it actualy becomes very larger right?Much larger than JVM which is of few megs only.
    The point 3 totally knocked me out.I have no idea what you said.
    Ok I tell you this.Just remember the definition that Hans gave already.If you ask me than its the best definition that we can have. Just remember this and if some one asks you more further than give them your point 3 definition and tell them understand this ;-).Please don'tmind I am just kidding. Its just semantics.Don't get lost into it.You will find many people using both the terms interchangibly. So its ok.I shall stick with Hans's defintion,simple and concise.There are lot more other topics to dig upon in oracle.I can mail you lots of them.Spend time on those.Don't think that I am demotivating you.I understand you asked only because you have a doubt.But we got a good resolution of it and beyond that, its not of much use to dig it atleast not in the technial terms.
    Cheers
    Aman....
    PS:Are you on oraclecommunity.net?

  • I have Photoshop cs6 Ext on an ASUS laptop. How can I increase the font size of the contents of the FILTER Panel situated on bottom left of screen. The font size is extreamly small and almost unreadable. I have changed display parameters, not the resoluti

    I have Photoshop cs6 Ext on an ASUS laptop. How can I increase the font size of the contents of the FILTER Panel situated on bottom left of screen. The font size is extreamly small and almost unreadable. I have changed display parameters, not the resolution, to no avail.
    David.

    Paragraph breaks are good for readability. ;-)
    Have you noticed any difference between your MacBook and others at the Apple store? Wondering whether this is a configurable setting at the system level, i.e., DPI.
    You can default Firefox to a larger zoom level to avoid having to zoom every page. You'll still be able to adjust the size for individual sites as needed. It sounds as though you are aware of these add-ons:
    * Default FullZoom Level: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/default-fullzoom-level/
    * NoSquint: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/nosquint/
    There are some discussions about changing coming in Firefox 22 (I think) to address higher density displays like the Retina display. So perhaps there will be a built-in setting to address this in the future.

Maybe you are looking for