Freight Cost not reflecting in MIRO for Return PO

HI MM Experts,
In standard Return Process we used to enter all the freight charges + base Price in the base Price only but we have a requirement where we have to show these freight charges (-100 INR) seperately other than base Price (-1000 INR) and the net price must appear as -1100 INR in PO.
I have a business scenario in hand where in Return PO different condition types like Insurance, Octroi and Freight cost are not reflecting while creating Credit Memo in MIRO.
I have created different condition types as mentioned above and Condition category as "F- Freight" is used and also used a routine 164 in Calculation type in Schema against these conditions to make the conditions negative (to make sure that all the above mentioned conditions must be added in base Price in PO).
In PO, all conditions are reflecting correctly and adding to the base Price. In GR also Return accounting is also happening correctly but in MIRO when i am trying to make credit memo then system only showing base price and taxes it is not reflecting other condition types (Insurance, Octroi and Freight ) in MIRO.
If anyone have any idea how to get these freight cost, insurance and octroi cost in MIRO then please reveret back.
Regards,
Neeraj

Hi Neeraj,
Before to answer this, once you are in MIRO, into the "PO reference" tab, do you have selected the option: 3 Good/services items + planned delivery costs?
This option is in the top on this tab in the right side.
Please, let me know your feedback.
Kind regards,
Sandra

Similar Messages

Freight cost not getting reversed

Hi All,
We have reversed a GRN for an item with delivery cost, we have observed that GRN cost gets reversed but delivery cost doesn't.
Is it a standard feature of SAP & how can we reverse the delivery cost. We can't delete the line items as we have paid advance.
Kindly inform how can we handle this issue.
regards.
Vinay

Hello SKD,
Please read note 49995 (question 3) that explains the behaviour.
Please check also notes that explains system behaviour:
571177 MIRO/MR11: Freight costs for service order
381030 Delivery costs in service
Planned delivery costs are not supported for service orders. There is no plan to change this in the near future.
For the future we recommend to use additional service line instead of planned delivery costs condition. There is no problem to post invoice for different vendor for particular SES created for service line that constitutes delivery costs.
Let me know if I misunderstood your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Baseline date not default in MIRO for Invoices posted against STO Pu.Order

Hi All,
Baseline date doesn´t default in MIRO for Invoices posted against an STO Purchase Order.
We are trying to post an Invoice in MIRO with reference to a STO Purchase Order for planning delivery cost.
Delivery cost in PO has not got the Vendor number because conditions are customized not possible to process manually so in MIRO the system asks to enter the Invoicing Party and then the baseline date.
The client requires that when the invoicing party is enter manually in MIRO, the term of payment should be pick up from Vendor Master Record.
Could someone confirm if this possible ?
Thanks and regards,
Laura

Hi Laura ,
The payment terms in Invoice are taken from PO only .
Refer SAP Note : 177224 for more details.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

STO pricing- FREIGHT COST NOT CAPTURED IN ACCOUNTING DOC

Hi...
I HAVE a requirement where i have to transport Material from one plant to another withen the same company code using sto delivery root,
the freight cost shoud be captured in seperate GL account, thus i have maiantined FR1 in pricing and assigned FRC1 condition type, i have maintained FRC1 as stastical as i dont want the freight cost to be added to material cost,
when i create STO and add FRC1 condition type, and do goods issue the price in the FRC1 condition type is not getting captured in the accouing document..
i have maintained OBYC setting for FR1 as well
Could anyone tell me where am i going wrong.

HI,
Check your Pricing Procedure in M/08 whether you have given FRE for your Act Key & FR1 for your Accrls key in your Freight Condition type FRC1 & also check the G/L account assignments in OBYC for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
SAP FC

Miro for return delivery mvt 122

Hi experts
I m doing miro ( credit memo ) for return delivery with mvt 122.
in this case it is not bringing the quantity and amount of which i have made the return delivery.
but it is bringing whole quantity and amount of PO.
Please help how can i get the amount of return delivery in credit memo automatically.

hi
if you have already posted the invoice then dont go by the movement type 122
the better way is to create an return Po with same vendor and material as before and in ME21N flag on the indicator return at item level.
Then do the vendor return wrt to the return PO using trax MIGO the system will use the movement type 161 here post the document
Then go to the MIRO trax and Post the credit memo.
Award if usefull
Regards
Sujoy

Migo reference document not appearing in miro for frieght conditions

Dear all,
I ahve done migo for a po and i have checked GR based invoice in PO.When i am doing MIRO i am not getting the migo reference number for frieght condition where as the migo reference number is appearing for base price.How to get that migo reference number for frieght conditions also.
thanks in advance
regards
vithal

Sometimes the the MIGO creator might have reversed the same. In such cases the reversal document may be with different number in the same series and both posted & reversed documents will not appear in MIRO. Since you might checking with posted document number, you are seeing the blank in MIRO. In such cases, just enter the PO number in MIRO, give date & reference number press Show PO structure button in the left corner. You will find the following screen
Expand the required once. The following screen appears. In this both positive & negative numbers with same reference & document type appearing are the reversed documents.
Hope this is clear

ADC for Domestic Purchase not flowing in MIRO for particular MIGO Document

Hello Experts,
    We've a scenario in which we pay ADC to domestic vendor. The procedure we follow is as below:
          1. Condition record for JAOP with 0% rate maintained in FV12.
          2. PO created with JMOP 10%, 2% ECS, 1% SECS & 4% VAT.
          3. During MIGO (also excise invoice capture), AED value is maintained
          4. After J1IEX, at the time of MIRO this ADC along with other duties flows in simulation
    Now in my case, there are number of GR documents for which MIRO is performed, but for particular GR, ADC is not flowing in MIRO and also excise duty is incorrect, it's not flowing from GR.
   So what is the probable solution for this, I've already checked MIGO & excise invoice documents & found to be ok.
Thanks in advance
        Amit

Hi,
Have you maintained material price including AED price??
If yes then check whether you have maintained JAX1-100% or not?
I think this should be treated as a dealer purchase as you are maintaining 0% amount for JAOP.
Regards,
Piyush

Shipment freight cost not posted for 4th vendor after GR

Hello,
I have tested and found that isystem limits the number of vendors in Shipment to 3 only.
It sort all the vendors in the shipment and create the entries for 1st three vendors (after sorting smallest to largest vendor number) and after GR posting it creates the entires in accouting doc for 3 vendors only.
I have 5 stages in the shipment and 5 items in shipment cost doc. If number of vendors are upto 3 it works fine if there are 4 or more vendors are added then it doesnot create the entries for those vendors.
Please suggest.
regards,
JPS

Hello,
Any idea.

Delivery Note not appearing in MIRO for DCGR

Hi Friends ,
I am facing a problem in MIRO . The Delivery Notes are not appearing for "Delivery Costs at GR"(DCGR) , while it comes for individual GR which u can see by Clicking the PO-History Tab . But when we check the PO-History in ME23 , there the Delivery-Notes gets reflected against DCGR .
The users are facing a problem because they are unable to determine which delivery Cost is against which GR ( as the Delivery Note doesn't appear ) .
Kindly reply as soon as possible , if any NOTES are to be applied or so .

Hi Sudha,
have you found solution for this prob? coz mine prob is about the same. but the different when they enter delivery note at material document GR at header, they put wrong number which is extra zero. i don;t know if this the factor coz invoice receipt not allowed to be process. i mean DCIR.
Regards
Aishah

Freight condition not appear in MIRO

Hi,
The freight condition is shown under PO - Item - Condition,however when try to do MIRO,it was not shown there.
Anyone know the reason?
Thanks.

Hello,
IN MIRO --Select layout Goods receipt/services+Planned delivery cost.
Or check is there any Differrent Vendor is there for freight , In PO select the freight Condition type and click on PO condition detail tab... you will get who is the Freight vendor.
If this is situation then Go and select the MIRO wrt Vendor and Click on More allocation tab then give here planned delivery cost you will get the Frieght in MIRO.
Mahesh Naik

Business area not reflected in MIRO additional details

Hi all,
There is problem regarding business area in MIRO, in follow on documents business area is not getting reflected for all the line items. Please see where the problem is, I have checked OMJ7 and business area is there for all Plant/Valuation area.
Regards,
Shweta.

Division was not maintained for material thats why the problem occured.

Fixed Freight Condition Not Reflecting In DCGR

Hi everyone! I am having issues with DCGR documents. My frieght condition does not seem to reflect in the DCGR document when I post the goods reciept.
Here are the details of the condition:
Condition class - A (Discount/Surcharge)
Calculation type - B (Fixed amount)
COndition category - B (Delivery costs)
I have also maintained the access sequence for this condition but still unsuccessful in getting the amount included in the delivery cost document.
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
Do you mean that your Frieght Cost should add to your material Cost? If so check whether you have activated the Accural key in Frieght Conidtions and also Check the relevant G/L account is assigned in OBYC settings against Transaction key.
Hope this will help you.
Tks
Mani

Cenvat clearing account is not coming in MIRO for Basic excise

Dear sir,
I have created the PO . After that i did GR for same at that I capture excise invocie& post it.
Accounting document is created for the same
here is accounting enrtry
        cenvat Basic = 100 debit
        cenvat edu cess = 2 debit
       Cenvat Higher Ecess =1 debit.
   Cenvat clearing account = 103 credit
when i go the miro
after simulating in miro i found
cenvat clearing account = 2 debit
but it should be 103 debit
why this is coming please help me...

Hi,
Generally it happens if CENVAT Clearing Account in not assigned in OB40 to the Tax Account Keys. But, as per you it has been maintained. So the following if you are using Tax Procedure TAXINN;
SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Basic Settings > Determination of Excise Duty > Condition-Based Excise Determination > Classify Condition Types

Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
Dharmveer

Hi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer

BED,ECS and SECess value not defaulted in J1IS for return purchase order.

1)I have created return purchase orde for an excisable material.
2) In the purchase order i am able to view the BED,ECS and SEcess values.
3) I have created MIGO, for the return purchase order with excise as part 1 only.
4) While doing J1is or the 161 material document number, the BED, ECS and SEcess values are not defaulted.
Kindly help me to solve this issue.
Regards,
jayakumar

Hi,
Check the settings in
Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Account Determination
Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction - Check for ETT OTHR
OTHR          CR Credit     PLAAED PLA AED account
OTHR          CR Credit     PLABED PLA BED account
OTHR          CR Credit     PLAECS PLA ECS Account
OTHR          CR Credit     PLASED PLA SED account
OTHR          CR Credit     RG23AED RG 23 AED account
OTHR          CR Credit     RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
OTHR          CR Credit     RG23BED RG 23 BED account
OTHR          CR Credit     RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
OTHR          DR Debit     MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
also check for Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Regards,
Vikas Mayekar

Freight Cost not reflecting in MIRO for Return PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for