Full Package

Hey am new to this and im a bit confused with all the different licensing options, do i understand it to be rite if i perchase a full package do i get full use out of it for life but pay full price, and if you have a different licence it last for a couple of years.
don't realy understand

need more energy resources for your computer

Similar Messages

Specify the full package path

Well, here is a real beginner question. How can i specify the full package path of SUNs java.io package? And another beginner question, where is this package located on my computer? (relative to my java sdk installion path of course)

Acctually I have a severe problem with leJOS. Here is my code:
import java.io.*;
import josx.rcxcomm.RCXBean;
public class PCModule
     public static void main( String[] args )
          recv();
     public static void recv()
          RCXBean rcxb = new RCXBean();
          try
               rcxb.setComPort("USB");
               while(true)
                    System.out.println( "Test" );
          catch( IOException e )
}This should compile fine, if lejosc would use the SUN java.io But it intends to use the own implementation of java.io and I really need to find a workaround to this problem because otherwise the code wont compile throwing the error, that the out symbol cannot be resolved.
Btw. this part of the program should listen to the mindstorms IR-Tower for messages of a RCX-Brig and wirte them to an output stream.
Isn't there a way to force lejosc to use the java.io package from sun?
P.S.: If I don't use the System.out-line everything is fine, so lejos is installed correctly and if write a java test app everything is fine, so the SUN Java SDK is installed correctly too.

Full package name?

All,
I am very new to Javadoc. I would like to know how (if possible) to eliminate the full package name from any descriptions. For example, if I have a method that returns a Hashtable, the Javadoc that gets generated looks like this:
public static java.util.Hashtable newMethod()
I would like it to look like this:
public static Hashtable newMethod()
I'm using the Eclipse tool, and that is actually calling Javadoc and passing the appropriate parms (v1.4).
I'm new to Javadoc, so I don't know if the generated method (with the package name) is preferred. I've also read some of the forum's comments on how to get started with this. I'm attempting to consolidate the lengthy Javadoc documentation, and some of the comments I've read have been helpful.
Thanks,
Van Williams

The default should display the package name only
for classes not in the "current" package.
For 1.4, use "-noqualifier all" to prevent the package
name from appearing ahead of the class name
for all packages. This is further described at:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#noqualifier
You can reduce the confusion this may cause
by using -linkoffline to create links to
classes not being documented, such as to
java.util.HashTable in your example. This
is further described at:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#linkoffline
-Doug Kramer
Javadoc team

Full package name needed when using FindClass?

When loading a class for use by the invocation interface, do I need to use the full package name of the class to be loaded, or just the class name?
For example, I have a program called MyProg. It is part of package MyProg, and when I run it, I have to do so using java MyProg.MyProg.
When loading the class, I've tried both of the following:
cls = (*env)->FindClass(env, "MyProg\\MyProg");
cls = (*env)->FindClass(env, "MyProg");Neither one works. Anyone know for sure which one it shoulf be? I suspect that there is a classpath issue coming into play as well, but that's another post. :)

Thanks! Just to clarify, this is on a Win32 machine.

I have PS 4,5,and 6 installed on my Macbook Pro as well as Lightroom 4 and 5. Can I remove PS 4 and 5 and LR 4? PS 4 is the total install and PS 5 and 6 are upgrades. LR 4 is the full package with LR an upgrade.

I have PS 4,5,and 6 installed on my Macbook Pro as well as Lightroom 4 and 5. Can I remove PS 4 and 5 and LR 4? PS 4 is the total install and PS 5 and 6 are upgrades. LR 4 is the full package with LR an upgrade.
I need space!

First let me disabuse of a misconception: All Adobe upgrades are FULL installers. Whether you buy them as upgrades or new versions does not make an iota of difference. The upgrade installers do not need to find a prior version installed, they just prompt you for the old serial number as well as the old one, and they do not rely on the old version in the least.
Second, the time to uninstall an older version is BEFORE upgrading to a newer one. Otherwise, the uninstaller from the older versions will mess up with your new install. There are a gazillion files that are named the same and in the same locations as the new one.
Your best bet now is to uninstall ALL the Photoshop versions you have installed, including the newest one, one by one, then run the Adobe CS Cleaner Tool, then run Repair Permissions from Apple's Desk Utility, and finally re-install the latest version.
The other alternative, if your boot HD is large enough (very doubtful in case of a laptop like a Mac Book), is to leave all versions on it.
Your choice.

I am a student who subscribed to the 9.99 photography package, I didn't realize there was a discount for students. I would like to upgrade to the full package with the student discount. I can not find the option for this. How do I do this?

I am a student who subscribed to the 9.99 photography package, I didn't realize there was a discount for students. I would like to upgrade to the full package with the student discount. I can not find the option for this. How do I do this?

Hi Djmontanalv,
Please go through the link below.
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cancel-membership-subscription.html
Regards,
Anand

I use Pro Logic 9 and see that to upgrade to Pro Logic X I need to buy the full package again. Does apple offer special conditions for their Apple clients ? Are users of apple care protection plan better served ?

I use Pro Logic 9.1.8. and see that to upgrade to Pro Logic X I need to buy the full package again. Does apple offer special conditions for their Apple clients ? Are users of apple care protection plan better served ?

Old saying applies here most of the time......
"If it ain't broken, don't fix it"
I choose to use LP9 with Snow Leopard myself (10.6.8 and 9.1.6) for most of my commercial work simply because I find that combo very stable and provides the best overall performance for my setups here... but I am also using LPX with Mavericks as part of my client support and that works fine too although with a drop in performance due to the heavier demands made on the hardware by the newer OS X and LPX graphic routines for example..

Class will only run with full package path - why?

Hi,
I've recently used Ant to package up a jar file with a simple gui application. Though I believe I've done everything right in terms of packaging I find that when I copy jar file to another computer not only do I need to unjar it I also need to use the full package name in order to get it to run. I thought that I should be able to run it by either using: java -jar CheckLogs
or jar -xvf logUtils.jar, and then java CheckLogs.
Instead only this will work:
java net.kenjanuski.utils.CheckLogs
My understanding is that if I put package net.kenjanuski.utils at top of file that I shouldn't have to use the full package name. Am I missing something obvious? By the way Ant did create the proper directory structure if I unpack the jar: net/kenjanuski/utils/...
Thanks for any ideas,
Ken

I'm not going to try to answer the jar question, but as far as package name goes, if your CheckLogs class starts with the statement "package net.kenjanuski.utils;" then the fully qualified name of the class is net.kenjanuski.utils.CheckLogs. The java.exe command uses the fully qualified name of the class. So the only way it will work is "java net.kenjanuski.utils.CheckLogs" just as you found out.
You can run the Jar file if you define the class in a Manifest file. See http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jar/basics/run.html

I don't need the full package. Is there an easy way to change from the full to photographer's package?

I'm trying to save money and realize that I don't need the full package. I wanted to just change over to photographer's pack with just Lightroom and Photoshop but I seem to be missing the way to do that through my account. Is there an easier way?

http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/return-cancel-or-change-order.html

Import vs full package name

So, I decided to fumble a bit with JavaFX. After having gotten myself a sh*tload of stress doing stuff in Flash and Actionscript, I'm ready for something that is intended as "code" from the ground up. One thing I ran into is this: AFAIK I have two identical custom nodes, the only difference is that one uses full package names and the other uses imports. The components just show an image.
Full package version:
public class SfeerNode extends javafx.scene.CustomNode
    public var sfeerimage : javafx.scene.image.Image;
    override function create() : javafx.scene.Node
        return javafx.scene.Group
            content:
            [     javafx.scene.image.ImageView
                      image: sfeerimage
}And the import version:
import javafx.scene.*;
import javafx.scene.image.*;
import javafx.scene.paint.*;
import javafx.scene.shape.*;
public class SfeerNode2 extends CustomNode
    public var sfeerimage : Image;
    override function create() : Node
        return Group
            content:
            [     ImageView
                      image: sfeerimage
}Usage is very straight forward, just like ImageView, and I can toggle between the two by simply adding or removing "2" after "SfeerNode" in the main code.
The problem: the full package version does NOT show the image, the import version does.
Why?

It is definitely a bug.
It is possible to extend only CustomNode class to make the first sample work .
import javafx.scene.CustomNode;
public class A extends CustomNode {
    public var sfeerimage : javafx.scene.image.Image;
    override function create(): javafx.scene.Node{
        return javafx.scene.Group {
            content:[ javafx.scene.image.ImageView {
                      image: sfeerimage
}

Can I buy Adobe Acrobat Standard as a full package, as one single payment

I don't seem to have the option for a one off purchase any more

Hi ,
You can purchase Acrobat Standard as a full package from the link below.
https://www.adobe.com/products/catalog/software._sl_id-contentfilter_sl_catalog_sl_softwar e_sl_allsoftware.html
Regards,
Anand

Changed to BT... But haven't received full package...

Hey,
We recently ordered the full package more or less from BT, including BT infinity 2, calls and TV.. As a change from Sky, We have had our phone line change already to BT but haven't heard anything about our broadband?
When will they be likely to sort me out some fibre optic? XD
Thanks in advance ^_^

re contact BT Sales and ask for your infinity install date
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Just ordered full package and regretting it alread...

Hi All,
I had a sign on for this community because i had BT sports through Sky.
I cancelled Sky and ordered a full package with BT around 3 hours ago and i am regretting this decision already.
One of the draws was the £150 Sainsburys vouchers, i forgot to ask about it on the phone and the operator never either.
I asked to retian my phone number and the operator says that was okay, i got the order though via email and it states my 'new number'
I call them and get told "i will pass you through to the relevent department" yes you guessed it - Bangladesh struggled to explain for a few minutes before being told i will have to cancel the whole order and re-order. I couldn't go through the broken English conversation for the whole order again.
Is this what i have to look forard to for the next 12 months? I am really considering knocking it on the head now.

Hi, you will find the Sainburys vouchers are only available for online orders.
https://www.vouchers.bt.com/offer/sainsburys
Stew

Can't build splashy-full package an my machine

As th subject tells, i'm not able to build the splashy-full package on my arch-machine.
I alwys get the following error:
splashy 0.3.13
Print debugging messages...... :
configure complete, now type 'make'
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-splashy-full/src/splashy-0.3.13'
Making all in po
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-splashy-full/src/splashy-0.3.13/po'
make[2]: Für das Ziel »all« ist nichts zu tun.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-splashy-full/src/splashy-0.3.13/po'
Making all in doc
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-splashy-full/src/splashy-0.3.13/doc'
make[2]: Für das Ziel »all« ist nichts zu tun.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-splashy-full/src/splashy-0.3.13/doc'
Making all in src
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-splashy-full/src/splashy-0.3.13/src'
if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/directfb -march=i686 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -Wall -Werror -DG_DISABLE_ASSERT -DG_DISABLE_CHECKS -MT xml_parser.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/xml_parser.Tpo" -c -o xml_parser.lo xml_parser.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/xml_parser.Tpo" ".deps/xml_parser.Plo"; else rm -f ".deps/xml_parser.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/directfb -march=i686 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -Wall -Werror -DG_DISABLE_ASSERT -DG_DISABLE_CHECKS -MT xml_parser.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/xml_parser.Tpo -c xml_parser.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/xml_parser.o
xml_parser.c: In Funktion »xml_parser_xpath_pop«:
xml_parser.c:94:25: Fehler: Variable »_last« gesetzt, aber nicht verwendet [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
xml_parser.c: In Funktion »xml_parser_stack_pop«:
xml_parser.c:109:21: Fehler: Variable »_last« gesetzt, aber nicht verwendet [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
cc1: Alle Warnungen werden als Fehler behandelt
make[2]: *** [xml_parser.lo] Fehler 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-splashy-full/src/splashy-0.3.13/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-splashy-full/src/splashy-0.3.13'
make: *** [all] Fehler 2
==> FEHLER: Ein Unfall geschah in build().
Breche ab ...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build splashy-full.
==> Restart building splashy-full ? [y/N]
==> -------------------------------------
==>
==> WARNING: Following packages have not been installed:
splashy-full
What am i doing wrong? How can i solve this?
Thx for your help & ideas!

easy to solve the problem, add the following to the PKGBUILD:
sed -e 's| -Werror||g' \
-i "${srcdir}/splashy-${pkgver}/Makefile" \
-i "${srcdir}/splashy-${pkgver}/configure" \
-i "${srcdir}/splashy-${pkgver}/configure.ac"
add it to the build() function,
just before 'make'

Is Encore included in he Adobe Premiere Pro CC full package?

Hi...I have downloaded a trial version of Adobe Premiere Pro CC and considering getting the full package of all apps. I don't have previous versions of Premiere Pro My main concern is regarding Adobe Encore. If I purchase the full Adobe CC package including Premiere will I get Encore and does Premiere Pro CC dynamic link to Encore?
Thanks in advance as this will influence my purchase.
kind regards
Stuart

Stu2882 wrote:
Thanks Jeff really appreciate the response however if you do not have
Premiere Pro CS6 what happens then? I won't be able to uninstall Premiere
and leave Encore CS6 because I do not have it in the first place.
Refer http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/download-previous-versions-creative-applications. html for how to access Premiere Pro CS6 as a Creative Cloud member.

Full Package

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for