GeForce 7300 GT with more than 2GB RAM?

I had a lot of crashes with my MP and had original 2x512MB & Kingston's 2x1GB installed.
I contacted Kingston's support when Rember caused kernel panic every time I tried to test memory with it.
They said that it is "known issue" that 7300gt does not work with current drivers with openGL applications and more than 2GB memory installed.
But my MP kept having kernel panics with rember (and with lots of other applications)without any openGL involved. I even ran Rember with Finder closed.
With only 2x512 or only 2x1 installed everything seems to be fine, except that there's not enough memory to use FCS efficiently.
Anybody had same problems?
Is this really "known issue"?
If it is, when is solution available?
MP+GF7300gt have been on the market over half a year now.
Any links and references would be appreciated.
I didn't find anything from apple's website and will be calling apple's support tomorrow...

I have 4 GBs installed in my Mac Pro w/7300 card. No problems whatsoever.
For best performance from quad-channel interleaving you may want to install either six additional 512 MB DIMMs (four in Riser A and four in Riser B) or two more 512 MB DIMMs (in Riser A) and four 1 GB DIMMs (in Riser B.)
In your current configuration I believe you should have two 512 MB DIMMs in Riser A and two 1 GB DIMMs in Riser B.
See Memory (FB-DIMM) Replacement Instructions.

Similar Messages

  • Mac Pro 2.66 crashing with more than 2GB ram

    I curently have a base config of 1GB ram (2 512MB chips), the systems runs fine, I then added memory in various configs and it always kernel panics when I exceed 2 GB. System runs fine until i try something memory intensive like Aperture or Photoshop.
    tried
    4 x 512MB chips (2GB) = perfect
    6 X 512MB chips (3GB) = crash
    2 x 512MB and 2 x 2GB (5GB) = crash
    2 X 2GB (4GB) = crash
    I have tried only riser 1, still crashes even with only the 4GB running. All memory is genuine apple and passes the hardtest CD.
    Any help much appreciated
    cheers

    Agreed.
    If you cannont get the memory to fail when only one or two pairs is in a given riser then it will be very difficult to diagnose and you'd have to suspect either a riser or mainboard problem.
    You do know that memtest will only test up to 2GB unless you buy the $0.99 version 4.14 though right? Lower versions shouldn't KP though, should just allocate 2GB and test.
    If it fails in both the following combinations:
    Riser A - 2x 512
    Riser B - 2x512, 2x 512
    Riser A - 2x 512, 2x 512
    Riser B - 2x512
    then I suppose I'd be suspecting hardware failure on the motherboard. BY the way, both risers boards are identical, you can swap Riser A for Riser B and still have a working system if it helps in your tests.
    I just went through the same thing, fortunately I had only 2 pairs (2x1GB) to work with...so I labelled the chips ABCD and worked the combinations through the risers A and B to determine that failure followed a given FBDIMM....after I'd done all this and found the suspected FBDIMM, I powered up the machine with the cover off for a change and found the red lights...did I feel silly then

  • Adding more than 2Gb RAM to MacBook Pro

    Do you guys know of any way to put more than 2Gb RAM in an Intel 17" MacBook Pro?
    Model Name: MacBook Pro 17"
    Model Identifier: MacBookPro1,2
    Processor Name: Intel Core Duo
    Processor Speed: 2.16 GHz
    Number Of Processors: 1
    Total Number Of Cores: 2
    L2 Cache (per processor): 2 MB
    Memory: 2 GB
    Bus Speed: 667 MHz
    Boot ROM Version: MBP12.0061.B03
    SMC Version: 1.5f10
    I bought this when the 17" models first came out, and have been disappointed in it ever since (I broke my rule of NOT buying the first generation of something). As time has passed, the main problem is the 2Gb limit for RAM. That's NOWHERE near enough, and shame on Apple for that limitation. If there were some way, even a non-standard way, of adding more RAM, I could get reasonable performance from this computer. As it is, this has been a wasted $3600 investment. whew!
    Any help or ideas would be appreciated. Thanks! Feel free to email bruce at dbsdesigngroup.com

    That's possible...actually likely. I'd love for that to be the case because I could fix it. ::Grin:: It's been this way since I first got it. When it arrived with just 1 Gb RAM, it was virtually unusable. I have a few apps as startup items, but they're just Firefox, Entourage, iNotepad, Linotype Font Explorer (with very few fonts activated), and Stickies. That shouldn't affect things much.
    My needs are to use Photoshop, Illustrator and GoLive at the same time, with MSWord, Firefox and Entourage open as well. After the first bit of usage, I end up with 4-6 pageouts and a VERY slow computer. While it's doing the pageouts (which take quite a while), or switching between apps, it's very slow. And it's also extremly slow when Spotlight is indexing, so I disabled that.
    I'm just not sure what it might be...nothing in Activity Monitor seems like it would be a culprit. Even in Safe Mode the problem is very evident.
    I'll keep exploring and hopefully find something that will make this machine more viable for my use. I really appreciate the input greatly.

  • More than 2GB RAM 1st gen Macbook

    Is there any way possible to get more than 2GB RAM in a 1st gen macbook? I have one 2GB stick in right now but if I try to put even the old 512MB in the other slot I get no video. I also tried two 2GB sticks as well. I'm pretty sure the answer is no, but it doesn't hurt to ask and have hope
    I have a dell inspiron with Core2 and it wouldn't see 4GBs until I pulled the battery on it. maybe there is a trick for the macbook like that?

    I was hoping since it sees one 2GB stick it may like 2? It was a long shot. I just got this one used, so I'm stuck with it for a while. It runs fine with 2GB though.

  • Problems deploying Windows 7 x64 computers with more than 8GB RAM

    SCCM 2012 R2 CU1
    Windows 7 x64
    We have a weird problem after upgrading from SP1 to R2 CU1. We have built a Windows 7 64 bit image with the latest updates (currently September 2014 updates). It deploys fine to all computers. But after some days – don’t know exactly – guess after 4-7 days
    - we start getting errors on computers with more than 8 GB of RAM. The errors just start out of the blue. We didn't change TS, image or driver package.
    The error shows in 3 different ways – depending of the computer model.
    1) BSOD – STOP 0x000000F4. Disk error.
    2) Task Sequence error 0x87D00269 when installing the first Application in TS. The error seems to have something to do with Management Point not found.
    3) Task Sequence simply stops after installing CMclient. No errors - it simply stops.
    For instance we get the BSOD on the Lenovo ThinkCentre M93p. But on the ThinkCentre M83 we get the TS error 0x87D00269. M93p and M83 uses the same driver package. They consequently  fail every time after the error has begun. If we reduce (remove physically)
    the memory to max. 8GB of RAM, they successfully run the Task Sequence.  We get the above errors on both Lenovo and HP machines with more than 8GB. 
    I made a copy of the production TS and started testing. I created a new driver package for M93p/M83. It contains only the NIC drivers. Now M93p an M83 successfully finishes the TS. Adding sata or chipset or MEI/SOL drivers to the package I get the 0x87D00269
    error on both m93p and M83. At least not the BSOD on the M93p ;-)
    Tried setting  SMSTSMPListRequestTimeout to 180 in the TS. Also tried putting in a 5 minute break before installing the first Application in the TS. Also tried putting in SMSMP=mp1.mydomain in the installation properties for the CMclient. It is still
    the same problem.
    Investigating the smsts.log on a computer with the 0x87D00269 error.
    Policy Evaluation failed, hr=0x87d00269 InstallApplication
    25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
    Setting TSEnv variable 'SMSTSAppPolicyEvaluationJobID__ScopeId_654E40B7-FC55-4213-B807-B97383283607/Application_d9eea5a0-0660-43e6-94b8-13983890bae2'=''InstallApplication 25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
    EvaluationJob complete InstallApplication25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
    MP list missing in WMI, sending message to location service to retrieve MP list and retrying. InstallApplication 25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
    m_hResult, HRESULT=87d00269 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\client\osdeployment\installapplication\installapplication.cpp,1080) InstallApplication
    25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
    Step 2 out of 2 complete InstallApplication 25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
    Install application action failed: 'SCIENCE PC Guide'. Error Code 0x87d00269 InstallApplication 25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
    Sending error status message InstallApplication 25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
     Setting URL = http://mp1.mydomain, Ports = 80,443, CRL = false InstallApplication 25-09-2014 08:59:59 3020 (0x0BCC)
    Investegating the 0x87D00269 error on the siteservers Status Messages Queries is weird.
    Install Static Applications failed, hr=0x87d00269. The operating system reported error 617: You have attempted to change your password to one that you have used in the past. The policy of your user account does not allow this. Please select a password that
    you have not previously used.
    Hopefully this is a bug in translating the errorcodes? Just to be sure I checked all the SCCM serviceaccounts and none of them have expired passwords.  And again why only on computers with more than 8GB RAM.
    Anyone else had problems rolling computers with more than 8GB og RAM?
    Why does this happens after a few days? To begin with, it runs just perfect and then starts failing on all machines with more than 8GB. Without a change in TS, image and driverpackage. We have seen this pattern for the last 3 month after
    updating our image with the latest Windows Updates. It all started after updating from SP1 to R2 CU1.
    Why does it only affect machines with more than 8GB RAM?
    How to get rid of the 0x87D00269 error?
    Seems to be somehow related to driver installation mechanism in SCCM in combination with Windows 7 64 bit, +8GB RAM and SCCM 2012 R2 CU1 or perhaps just R2.
    Any help or hints would be appreciated!
    Thanks
    Anders

    We have the same workaround, using a x64 boot image resolved all our issues with WinPE 5.0.
    Machines with >4GB of RAM
    Lenovo ThinkPad T540p failed applying drivers with 80040005
    Black screen/white cursor issues intermittently
    No updates from Microsoft, they are still looking through the logs, but we have updated our boot images and all is well now. Our case it still open with Microsoft, they are researching the logs.
    Daniel Ratliff | http://www.PotentEngineer.com

  • Firefox uses more than 2GB RAM

    Hi,
    I'm using HP laptop with OS Windows 7 Professional edition.
    I observed in the task bar that firefox consumes more than 2GB of ram just with 3 or 4 tabs.
    Could you please let me know what are the memory tweaks or steps to reduce the memory consumption???
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    Regards,
    Kathir

    Memory usage is influenced by the type of site you use and the additional software Firefox may be using
    * see [[high memory usage]]
    Do your tabs include for instance massive webmail databases, or High Definition video.
    If you key into the location bar ''about:memory'' you will open an interactive page about memory usage, that should be more informative than the Windows task Manager.

  • Satellite L40-12X - More than 2GB RAM?

    Hello,
    I was wondering if there's any solution how to enable support for more than 2GB of RAM on Satellite L40-12X notebook? I'm running Vista 32-bit, but every additional MB counts...
    PeterA

    At the moment, your laptop can run up to 3GB Ram. However, it will not make much differences as the chipset X3100 cannot do as much as we expect.

  • Successful install of 8.1.7 on Solaris 8 with more than 256Mb RAM

    To all who have struggled with this one, like me. You owe me a bottle of Rogaine.... but I will accept a bottle of Jack instead.
    It appears that the kernel parameters published in the Install Guide are only good for Solaris 8 with up to 256Mb RAM
    If dbassist craters at around 80% in OUI with a "Can't connect to Oracle" and you have more than 256Mb on board
    DOUBLE the kernel parameters !!!
    shmmni = 200
    shmseg = 20
    semmns = 400
    semmni = 200
    semmls =200
    semopm =200
    touch /reconfigure (they don't mention that in the Guide)
    reboot
    If someone out there can isolate which actual damn kernel parameter is the culprit, I will gladly share some Jack with you.
    Otherwise an email to [email protected] with a comment or three will suffice.
    Cheers

    Sorry to ask a dumb question, but want to be precise, whn you say touch/reconfigure, do you mean touch system.
    WHat is the reconfigure?

  • Anyway to get more than 2GB Ram in my MDD Dual 867?

    Didn't know if there was a workaround to get my MDD G4 to recognize 1GB memory modules.
    I know that there are some workarounds for other issues like big HDs on the pre MDD Powermacs, so I was hoping there might be a workaround for this.

    For typical use, yes-2 gigs is plenty. There are certain factors,though, that would necessitate a higher volume of memory, such as using Final Cut Studio or other pro level applications. Of course the more non-pro apps you a running, the more memory you will use but most apps only use a few megabytes each and there is a portion of your hard drive that is allocated for virtual memory anyway.
    I hear that the Mac Pro needs more memory to run smoothly. In the Mac Pro thread there are those who constantly complain about how slow their Mac Pro's run with only 2 gigs of memory while 4 gigs is considered the "sweet spot". Maybe it's a hardware thing?
    I am currently only running 756 MB and everything seems fine, FCE would probably run a little more smooth (I hope) when I eventually get around to upgrading to 2 gigs, but outside of that every works fine.

  • More than 2GB Ram on Qosmio G20 (PQG20E)?

    I tried to install 4GB Ram on an G20-106 but not even the BIOS would load. Newest BIOS-version (v1.40) is running. Is there really a 2GB Limit on this machine, and if so, why?

    Hi mate,
    yes, the machine is only able to handle 2GB of RAM because its an chipset limitation. The chipset is an 915PM from intel and you can read about the limitation when clicking on the following link: http://www.intel.com/Products/Notebook/Chipsets/915PM/915PM-overview.htm
    and checking the "Technical Documents" where the Datasheet states also a RAM limitation of 2GB.
    Hope I was able to clarify your mind. :)
    Greets

  • P67A-GD65B3 won't post with more than 2 RAM sticks/P

    Issue is as stated.  On this board the dimm slots are listed as 1,2,3,4 (as marked on motherboard).  The computer will consistently power cycle (not even post) when RAM is in any dual channel configuration.  I've tried 4 sticks of memory (2 separate orders of 2x4GB).  All RAM sticks work in non-dual channel mode.  I've modified the voltage to 1.65.  I've verified the timings are correct at 8-8-8-24.  I've inserted 1 stick at a time, let boot all the way to windows, and inserted the next stick.  I tried the inserting 1 at a time numerous different ways.  Anything else I may have missed?  If not, I guess its RMA time.

    Quote
    2 separate orders of 2x4GB
    Check with G.Skill. I believe they only warranty & suggest one kit being installed. Differences in batches are noted as the excuse if memory serves me. UEFI/BIOS version 1.D was released by MSI to accomodate the non standard SPD profile programming, since a newer one, 1.E is installed, it rules a problem there out. It's also possible the RAM requires X.M.P. to be enabled to make them work correctly. Again, G.Skill is going to be the best source for advice on how to get their product to work.

  • No POST with more than 2 RAM slots?

    Hello community! Yuu are my last hope.
    I recenly purchased the MSI X99S and tried to install 4x4GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4, but it wont work. It does work with only 2 Sticks. I verified that the RAM is not broken, though. I also used the required quad-channel DIMM-Slots. Anyone else having this problem and a potential fix? Currently I can only use 8 GB.

    Hello! Thank you for the answer. I have the X99s SLI Plus Motherboard. I tried it and the result is, that my PC only boots when the RAM is inserted in DIMM 1 and 3. Is it supposed to work in every single slot? Because it doesnt even work if I put one each in DIMM 1-4.

  • Please Help :( iMac 20" refuses to boot up with anymore than 1gb ram?

    Please Help iMac 20" refuses to boot up with anymore than 1gb ram?  It was fine 4 days ago and had been working with a 1gb stick in one slot and a 2gb stick, which had replaced the orignal 1gb stick that I got it with, in the other and it had shown 3gb of ram and was working just fine with that since November?  It went to sleep briefly 4 days ago while I was waiting on a customer and I came back to try to wake it up and it never would forcing me to hard boot it.  When I did that it would only go to a black screen with a solid white light on the power indicator.  Over and over again and same thing.  I read and tried every suggestion I could possibly find in this and a few other mac forums to no avail.
    I finally after reading about RAM issues etc.  I decided to power off and take out the ram sticks and try them one at a time in each slot.  So I took out the 2gb stick and did the SMC reset and it would boot up and work just fine with the 1 gb of ram.  So then I went through the same process with the 2gb stick and it would not boot up only go to a black screen with white solid light again (NOT flashing).  So then I tried the other original 1gb I had replaced with the 2gb and it worked just find like the other 1gb.  So then I tried just 1gb stick in the other ram slot (back facing one) and with just the 1gb strip it booted up and worked fine.  Tried it with the other 1gb stick and once again that one too worked just fine.  So I determined it wasn't the slot itself I thought?  I then tried the 2gb in the back slot and it would not boot only go to the black screen white solid light deal like before.  So I thought well ok it's obviously the 2gb ram must have somehow went bad (even though I have only had it since November) and I thought well I will just use the (2) 1gb sticks in each slot and then that will at least give me 2gb because only 1gb really ***** LOL.  So I proceeded to go through the same shut down process installed both sticks (I always push them to I feel them click and my fingers have a nice indention on them) reset the SMC and turned the power one and.... It would only go to the black screen with white solid light on power indicator????  I went through the same above process at least 3 times and again today a few times and I can't figure it out and I tried to search and search and I couldn't find anything like what I am experiencing.....What happened?  Please help this slow Imac is killing me.  It will work with 1gb ram only nothing more?  Here are the specifics of my Imac.
    It is a 20" Late 2006 Intel Core 2 Duo 2.16 ATI Radeon X1600 256 MB graphics card and Ram with now only 1gb (did have 3gb) and I am running OSX Lion 10.7.5
    When I go to system report and go under memory it shows this:
    BANK 0/DIMM0:
      Size:          1 GB
      Type:          DDR2 SDRAM
      Speed:          667 MHz
      Status:          OK
      Manufacturer:          0xCE00000000000000
      Part Number:          0x4D342037305432393533435A332D43453620
    BANK 1/DIMM1:
      Size:          Empty
      Type:          Empty
      Speed:          Empty
      Status:          Empty
      Manufacturer:          Empty
      Part Number:          Empty
      Serial Number:          Empty
    Any help I can get would really be appreciated.  Thanks in advance
    ALSO...Here is also a pic of the system log right before it happened.  It even changed the date to 07/2014????
    I have some more if needed??????????????? 
    <Personal Information Edited by Host>

    The Memtest just completed and came back like this?  It only test the single 1gb chip because anything more in this computer it won't go past the black screen with solid white power light. 
    Memtest version 4.22 (64-bit)
    Copyright (C) 2004 Charles Cazabon
    Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Tony Scaminaci (Macintosh port)
    Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 only
    NOTE: No command-line arguments have been specified
    Using defaults: Test all available memory, one test pass, no logfile
    Mac OS X 10.7.5 (11G63) running in multiuser mode
    Memory Page Size: 4096
    System has 2 Intel core(s) with SSE
    Requested memory: 250MB (263086080 bytes)
    Available memory: 250MB (263086080 bytes)
    Allocated memory: 250MB (263086080 bytes) at local address 0x0000000101000000
    Attempting memory lock... locked successfully
    Partitioning memory into 2 comparison buffers...
    Buffer A: 125MB (131543040 bytes) starts at local address 0x0000000101000000
    Buffer B: 125MB (131543040 bytes) starts at local address 0x0000000108d73000
    Running 1 test sequence... (CTRL-C to quit)
    Test sequence 1 of 1:
    Running tests on full 250MB region...
      Stuck Address       : ok             
      Linear PRN          : ok             
    Running comparison tests using 125MB buffers...
      Random Value        : ok
      Compare XOR         : ok
      Compare SUB         : ok
      Compare MUL         : ok
      Compare DIV         : ok
      Compare OR          : ok
      Compare AND         : ok
      Sequential Increment: ok
      Solid Bits          : ok             
      Block Sequential    : ok                
      Checkerboard        : ok             
      Bit Spread          : ok               
      Bit Flip            : ok               
      Walking Ones        : ok               
      Walking Zeroes      : ok               
    All tests passed!  Execution time: 362 seconds.
    logout
    [Process completed]
    Seems Okay I guess?

  • Adding more than recommended RAM?

    I have a late 2006 model Macbook (13.3 inch Black) running Leopard (Mac OSX 10.5.8). Specifics: 2GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM. It is running slowly and freezes/crashes programs (notably MS Word 2008 v. 12.3.5 and iTunes 10). Thinking about getting 4GB of RAM to put off having to buy a new computer. But Apple does not recommend more than 2GB of RAM for this model. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1651#link3. But has anyone else upgraded the RAM and been fine?
    I need something that can run iTunes, MS Office, and iLife reasonably well with a minimum of freezing or crashing. I am a music student finishing up my doctorate and need these programs to work well! Perhaps it's just time to upgrade to a new computer? My 2006 Macbook is still plugging along, so I'm hesitant to upgrade unless I have to...
    I have 39GB free and 72GB used. Most of my information is stored on my 1TB WD external.

    Here's a screen shot of the activity monitor - I'm sure it's very high because I'm using Sophos to scan for anything untoward. I'm not sure how to do a crash dump, though. I can get into Library/Logs/CrashReporter and see individual logs. But the last log is from 3/1...and iTunes alone has crashed probably at least 5x today.
    Would 3gb give enough space to the computer to make it worth the effort?

  • If my Mini is running 64 bit can I run more than 4Gb RAM?

    I hear ALL over the place that the mini can not use more than 4Gb RAM.
    Is this a hardware limitaion of the motherboard/Processor?
    OR
    Is this due to the fact that mini's run at 32 bit?
    You can now easily run modern mini's at 64 bit:
    http://blog.leanopen.nl/2010/04/23/doesnt-your-mac-mini-want-to-boot-in-64-bit/
    So who knows the REAL answer?
    Thanks -
    skibum

    Most of the Minis are limited to less than 4GB and that is a hardware limitation. The newest Mini with the nVidia video can access more. Apple only supports 4GB because they use matched DIMMs, which on paper have a slight performance improvement over unmatched DIMMs. For whatever reason, Apple doesn't yet support 4GB DIMMs in the Mini. (I suspect that the power requirements or prices for the larger DIMMS may have affected Apple's decision.)
    If you do have an appropriate Mini, then you can get compatible 4GB DIMMs from [Macsales|http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/mac-mini> or others. Regardless, although I normally trust Macsales, more than 4GB is not supported by Apple, so you have to take that in to consideration. (i.e.: warranty from Apple or Applecare.)

Maybe you are looking for

  • US Ipads in the UK?

    Hello all - I want to buy an Ipad while back in the US. Can I still use it without any compatibility issues/wireless problems here in the UK? Does it affect anything in regards to ease of use, connectivity, etc?

  • Can I run a fast timed loop?

    It appears that a timed loop cannot run faster than 100 hz. In other words, the "period" input for a timed loop cannot be less than 10. Is this true? I am using the Elapsed Time VI to measure time increments. The time increments output from this VI a

  • Printhead Problem Error

    Hello, I have an HP 8500 a909g all in one or 8500ag im not sure but it has a touch screen on it and when I turn it on I get the error message the following printhead has a problem Black/Yellow (k/Y)  I tried power resets, pulled the printhead out cle

  • How to synchroniz​e sampling on PXIe-5162

    Hi, I need to characterize phase and amplitude imbalance of two quadrature signals from a 14bit TxDAC. I selected two 5162 modules to do the job. The signals can have a frequency of up to 1.2GHz.. Is PXIe-5162 capable of doing this job? The plan was

  • Scheduled refresh of Discoverer Portlet is failed

    Hello Experts, I am now facing an issue while refreshing the Oracle Discoverer Portlets. thay are scheduled to run at specific intervals. I am getting the following errors Main Error for some portlets 5014> Element not found for: {cn=cf_a104, wbf=1,