Global Organization Structure

Hi all,
We are setting up our Org Structure. As it is a global company operating in different countries, we are setting up Org Units as Company codes first and then down to Divisions and Departments. So the sub org unit HR appears under 3 different company code level org units.
Now if I want to pull a headcount report for the whole HR department to see how many and who are the employees fall under HR worldwide, how can I do so? This kind of report per department or divisions worldwide is always run by business users, as their current Org Structure is global and not country specific. What is the correct way to do it?
Please guide.
Thanks.

Hi
Try these:
Transaction Code     Short text
PPSC                 Create Structure
PPSM                 Change Structure
PPSP                 Succession Planning
PPSS                 Display Structure
PPST                 Structure Evaluation
Regards,
Sreeram

Similar Messages

  • Determination of KM document approvers from ECC Organizational Structure

    Hi,
    As part of a requirement of my client, I need to determine the approvers of the KM folders automatically from the HR organizational structure that resides in the ECC side.
    e.g. I want the document approval process to be started by the approval of my Finance specialist, then go on with the approval of Finance manager he/she is reporting to in the organizational structure and last with the approval of Finance director.
    The organizational structure is as follows:
    HR Director
    |
    HR Manager
    |
    HR Specialist
    The scenario mentioned above cannot be solved with roles or groups because the reporting relationship between the specialist and manager is of importance for the approval process.
    Please suggest a way to determine approvers from the HR Organizational Structure on the ECC side. This does not have to be a standard solution and can involve some extra coding.
    Thanks in advance for your support.
    Best regards,
    Dilek

    Hi SK,
    I think it will be a total gross injustice to the robustness that the SAP GTS offers while executing global trade if you opt for asynchronous check for sales order and this is a very rare business case.
    If anyhow a check is required for which the SAP GTS system is being used and if it is executed in real time rather than without any delay, then I see no reason to implement your suggestions as such.
    But you can opt for asynchronous check by deactivating the functional module which is called when a sales order is saved and which transfers the latest recorded changes to the SAP GTS system.
    For your second requirement, I can say if the GTS system has not checked your sales order, then how it can but a block on it instantaneously when the GTS system is up. For this you either need to wait for a while or get some customized code in play for placing a block automatically when a sales order is saved.
    Regards,
    Aman

  • Organization Structure for multiple countries

    Hi,
    We are setting up GLOBAL support organization. Our support organization includes following countries:
    1. China
    2. Japan
    3. Korea
    I am reading the SAP blog from forum. It says that,
    "Enter the necessary data in the address tab (City and Country). In the Function Tab, Select Service and Service Organization. In the Attributes Tabs, check for the attribute maintenance Scenario: Service that you have a value in the attribute Country. Be aware that the basic organizational determination process is based on the Country value. This means that all of your business partners should have the same value in this attribute. If you have more than one country then you should create several organizations".
    My query is:
    In my organization structure, it involves three countries (China, Japan & Korea). I have included all the three countries in a single organization structure. But as per the above statement, should i need to create three organization structure for three countries?
    Regards
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    Sorry for late response: but the answer is no, only one structure for each country.
    Dr. Berg

  • Error while creating the Organization structure.

    Hi,
    I am trying to create an Organization structure in SRM 5 sytem, I have created a Root for the structure and when i try to click on the Attribute Inheritance or the Check tab below i am getting an error "Start program BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL first (see note 563180 and long text)" but i have replicated one plant from the R/3 system using BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_SELECTED and the material groups and all the other relevant datas from R/3. I can see in the table BBP_LOCMAP the plant been associated with the relevant company code. I am now struck in creating the organization structure. I am not sure where i am going wrong while creating the Org model.Please give me your valuable inputs to overcome this error.
    Regards
    GGL

    Go to transaction SM30, table T77S0
    Add an X to the following entry:
    Group = EBP          
    Sem abbr. = LMIGR        
    Val. Abbr. = X       
    Description = Locations Successfully Migrated
    This tell the system that the locations have been replicated and the error indicating location get all needs be executed will go away.
    thanks,
    justin
    Edited by: Justin Farley on Feb 25, 2009 7:16 PM

  • Problems assigning BP to a position in the organizational structure

    I tried to assign a bp to a position in the organizational structure,
    but I receive this message "Object cannot be assigned to object CliC
    Agent in the period 21.12.2006 - 31.12.9999".
    Also, I notice that in the screen, the checkbox where i can select for
    the business partner is missing.
    However, I can assign a user to the org structure.
    Before upgrading, it was working. This is the support packages that it was in.
    SAP_ABAP: Level 9
    SAP_BASIS: Level 9
    PI_BASIS: Level 9
    SAP_AP: Level 6
    BBPCRM: Level 6
    After the upgrade to the following,
    SAP_ABAP: Level 10
    SAP_BASIS: Level 10
    PI_BASIS: Level 10
    SAP_AP: Level 7
    BBPCRM: Level 7
    The assigning of business partner to a position no longer works.

    Hi,
    we're facing exactly the same problem, it was all going well until we went on production.... we applied note 997009 which results in a different error... did you manage to find a solution yet ?
    Regards,
    Jacob.

  • FI organizational structure in ECC 6.0

    Dear all,
    I would like to know what is the suggested organizational structure in FI in ECC 6.0. For example, whether it supports multiple company code or single company code. If a company code is situated out of India, how the taxation and all will be consolidated etc. etc.
    Kindly can any one provide me documents on the above subject related to Finance Module.
    It will be very helpful If anyone sends the required documents
    Email id : [email protected]
    Thanking you in advance
    Vijaya

    Hi Vijayalaxmi,
    SAP 6.0 ECC is supports what data you doing in previous versions like 4.7 or 5.0 etc
    you can set company in india or out of india and  taxation also same what you doing in previous versions
    differece is ECC 6.0 is some extra functions is added on advance purpose
    Organizational Units and Basic Settings
    Definition
    Elements of the SAP System logical structure, important for Financial Accounting.
    Organizational units are used to structure business functions and for reporting. The organizational units of Financial Accounting are used for external reporting purposes, that is, they fulfil requirements that your business is subject to from external parties, for example, legal regulations. The financial statements for example, are created based on the organizational units of Financial Accounting.
    Basic settings in Financial Accounting are Customizing settings that you have to make in order to be able to carry out processes in Financial Accounting.
    Use
    You create your company-specific organizational structure in the SAP System by defining the organizational units and making the basic settings. Defining organizational units for Financial Accounting is obligatory, that is, you have to define these units in order to be able to implement the Financial Accounting component.
    Organizational unit
    Definition
    Client
    Obligatory
    Company
    Optional
    Company code
    Obligatory
    Business area
    Optional
    Basic setting
    Chart of accounts
    Obligatory
    Fiscal year
    Obligatory
    Currencies
    Obligatory
    Integration
    In the SAP System, you define the relevant organizational units for each component that you are implementing. For example, for Sales and Distribution, you define sales organizations, distribution channels, and divisions (product groups). Similarly, for Purchasing, you define purchasing organizations, evaluation levels, plants, and storage locations. The organizational units are independent of one another at this stage.
    Components and Organizational Units
    Component
    Organizational unit
    Sales and Distribution
    Sales organization, ...
    Logistics
    Purchasing organization, ...
    Financial Accounting
    Company code, ...
    Controlling
    Controlling area, ...
    Human Resources
    Employee groups, ...
    To transfer data between the individual components, you have to assign the organizational units to each other. You only need to make these assignments once in the system. Whenever you enter data subsequently, it is automatically transferred.
    For example, invoices that are posted in SD are transferred to FI.
    Below link will give total structure of organisational structure
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/e5/0779ee4acd11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Hope this infirmation will helps you
    Prem

  • ALE: e-recruiting organizational structure transfer

    Hi friends,
    I want to transfer the organization structure or the organization plan with O,S,C object types from one SAP system to another SAP system.
    I have done the ALE configuration and using PAFL transaction to do the same.
    I would like to know that model view i should use for the distribution also i would want to know the screen parameters in PAFL transaction.
    I am doing the same for E-recruiting separate instance.
    Regards,
    Divya
    Points would be given

    Hello,
    We are still having a problem with failing iDocs everytime we pass over IT0105 Sty 1 records from our SAP system to E-Recruiting.
    Would anyone happen to know where I should start looking to troubleshoot this error message?
    "Password is not long enough (minimum length: 6 characters)"
    Currently both systems require that your password be at least 6 characters long, which makes this message even more perplexing.
    Having a better understanding of how RBDAPP01 processes inbound IDOCS in status 64 would help.  We are using message type HRMD_ABA.  Our data filter looks like....
    Infotype: 1000
    Object Type: C, O, S
    Infotype: 1001
    Object Type: C, O, S
    Subtypes: A002, A007, A008, A012, B002, B007, B008, B012
    Infotype: 1001
    Object Type: O, S
    Subtypes: A003, B003
    Infotypes: 0000, 0001, 0002
    Object Type: P
    Infotype: 0006
    Object Type: P
    Subtype: 1
    Infotype: 0105
    Object Type: P
    Subtypes: 0001, 0010   
    So the question is how is IT0105 Sty 1 being processed when RBDAPP01 runs?
    Thank you for your help!
    Ryan
    Edited by: Ryan Hubbell on Mar 31, 2009 7:00 PM
    Edited by: Ryan Hubbell on Mar 31, 2009 7:47 PM

  • Calculation of minority interest in matrix organization structure

    Hello-
    We are currently implementing sem-bcs and have a matrix organization structure in place. We use company code and profit center as consolidation units. Company code being the currency carrying unit.
    We are facing an issue in minority calculation-
    Let us take the following example -
    Investee A - books equity in pc A
    Holding entity B books investments in pc B
    The above information were entered in AFD and was also pulled in BCS as RFD..
    The first consolidation happens as per our expectations.
    For subsequent consolidation, the retained earnings account (additions movement) could have multiple profit centers. The system calculates minority interest correctly for combination of retained earnings addition @ PC A. However for all other combinations (I.e retained earnings for PC other than A), the system treats the entire amount as minority interest (even though that's not the case)..
    Kindly advise.
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply...
    The PC hierarchy is already in place..I maintained Additional Financial Data for the other combinations (of Cons Unit and PC) with 100% share and zero value. The system considered that and calculated minority interest correctly.
    I wish to know if the above approach is ok..
    Thanks

  • Organization structure in extended classic scenario

    Hi All
    I  am trying to configure extended classic scenario on SAP SRM 7.0.  I have made the following settings for the same:
    1. In SPRO->SRM Server-> Technical Basic Settings -> Define backend system from product category, I have specified target system as SRM system and not ECD system
    2. In SPRO->SRM Server->Cross Application Basic Settings-> Activate Extended Classic Scenario, I have selected all the options including "Back end purchasing group responsible"
    I have a few doubts.
    1. In organization Structure (PPOMA_BBP) Comapny code is corresponding to company code in back end but do I have to create local purchasing organization and local purchasing group i.e. in Functions-> Corresponds  I'll have to leave blank. plz suggest
    2. Also is IPC configuration mandatory for extended classic scenario
    Plz give your suggestion on above mentioned issue
    Regards
    Pawan Keshwani
    Edited by: pawankeshwani on Mar 18, 2011 8:33 AM

    Hi Pawan,
    No you should mention Purch Org & Purch Grp also wrt your backend (ECC).
    IPC need not be configured separately from SRM 5.0 onwards. To ascertain if IPC is working fine just run the report : RSVMCRT_HEALTH_CHECK. You should see 4 success messages. Else get in touch with Basis to enable Virtual Machine Container (VMC)
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Organization structure in CRM 7.0 from ECC and HR

    Hi,
    We are trying to download Org structures from ECC and HR. (CRM 7.0, HR & R/3 ECC 6.0)
    From HR
    The ALE distribution is set across the systems CRM and HR and I did the PFAL run as per the best practices BB C05. There are about 100,000 Idocs inbound to CRM system and out of which about 15K are in 51 status and the rest are in 53 status.
    Observations:
    The Organization structure from HR is not totally mapped in CRM but only a part of it is displayed in PPOMA_CRM.
    The remaining Org units are found in 'non-related objects' selection.
    All the Idocs in failure are in error "Error in subroutine read_namtb for structure  of infotype  ". When I go to the long text
    Message no. 5-109
    Diagnosis
    An error has occurred in subroutine read_namtb for structure  of infotype .
    Procedure
    Check the entry for infotype  in table T777D (structure, IDoc segment, expanded structure) and the corresponding structures.
    I am not sure which infotype needs to be checked in T777D.
    From ECC
    The CRM - ECC connectivity is set. Downloaded all the required customizing objects successfully. Switched the org model to "enhanced backend integration version " and then followed on to SPRO->CRM->Master Data->Organizational Management->Data transfer->Copy SAP ECC structure and selected all the available R/3 Organization assignments available and then selected the "generate selected lines".
    Observations:
    All the generated org units are in GREEN in SPRO but there are no assignments found in PPOMA_CRM not even in the unrelated objects
    Checked tables HRP1000 and HRP1001 from the CRM Sales org unit IDs (ex: O 5000012) created here and they are not found but the generation is in GREEN.
    I will appreciate any assistance I get here.
    << Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
    Regards,
    DT
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 20, 2010 4:25 PM

    Hello DT,
    Could you please let me know the process how the problem is solved..
    even we are having the same issue like, we have downloaded the Org Model form HR to CRM system, till here it was fine.
    when we are trying to download the ECC sales structure(CRMC_R3_ORG_GENERATE) to CRM system, i have selected all the items and triggered the Gerenerated Selectd Lines, but after all the items are generating in a error with RED.
    Could you please share you knowledge, so that it will help me in figuring out the issue.
    Thanks in Advance DT. Hope you reply back.
    Regards,
    Ven

  • Regarding workflow  organization structure

    hi Gurs.
    How to create Organization Structure, Create Workflow with Multiple Approval based on Organization Structure.
    this is my requirement i dont no how to create  organization  structure in which tcode  i have to build and what all steps.
    pl help me.
    Regards
    vijay

    Hi,
    Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
    2 weeks ago, therefore, I recommend that you either:
    - Rephrase the question.
    - Provide additional Information to prompt a response.
    - Close the thread if the answer is already known.
    Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
    Kind regards,
    Siobhan

  • Organizational structure graphical view

    Hi Friends,
    we have problem with the organizational structure graphical view in OM. the system can not read the texts fonts, we don't use english characters. what should we do?
    Thanks

    Hi there!
    Hope you both don't mind but I am piggy backing on your OM discussion. You both sound like have good experience in working with Turkey. I am trying to find a standard infotype to store a Turkish Identification no, SSN, and Local ID card numbers. I am leaning towards IT0185 but first want to check around to see if there are Turkish infotypes specifically for these types of documentation. Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
    Thank you in advance.
    Dina

  • Organizational Structure Search Help in Webdynpro ABAP

    Hi,
    I need an organizational structure search help in webdynpro abap.
    It should list the organizational structure in tree view like RH_OBJID_REQUEST lists.
    I tried to use RH_OBJID_REQUEST function in webdynpro but I got " A RAISE statement in the program
    "CL_GUI_CUSTOM_CONTAINER=======CP" raised theexception condition "CNTL_ERROR" short dump.
    Is there such a function for webdynpro abap and  how can I achive this with select options?
    Thanks in advance..
    MERAL

    Great article.  I also had this probelm a year ago. My problems questions are:
    Is it possible to select more then one entry in the tree?
    What about selecting all childrens with one click?
    In my solution I inserted this tree, into a table and the table had a checkbox, row, so the user can check the required org units, (more then one) and there was a separate button, for "select all children"

  • Help in defining organization structure with reference to new gl

    Hi Experts,
    I need some help in defining organization structure with reference to new GL. I have three legal entities spread across 17 locations. In each location there may be three legal company entities in operation. And in each company code there are 5 to 6 several product lines. I have defined 3 legal entities as 3 company codes, but my concern is how do i define these 17 locations as and how do i define these product lines. We do location wise reporting meaning if i take one location i draw P&L for all the 15 product lines of the combined 3 company codes. Like wise for we do individual location wise reporting. As ususal we do budgeting location wise for departments for each individual company code.
    I thought of using business area as locations, but i heard SAP doesnt support anymore on business due to new gl concept and moreover business area doesnt populate in all transactions. Can we use new gl concept like segments and so, i am sorry i am very new to New gl. Can the location wise combined reporting be done in consolidation or it can achieved in new gl
    Can somebody share their expertise on how to achieve this either my new gl or traditional gl.
    Thanks in advance
    Best Regards,
    gj

    Hi Experts,
    Looking forward some help on this issue.
    Best Regards,
    gj

  • Sales organization structure changes in COPA

    Hi All,
    My client like to change Sales organization structure like Distribution channel,division,sales office,sales group etc. and profit centers in sales orders.
    from 01/01/2011 we like to post all open sales order's settlments to new sales organization,distribution channel,division,sales office,sales group and profit centers in COPA.
    What is the best way to achieve this?
    Any help is appreciated.....
    Thanks,
    Anusha

    Hi,
    I think COPA realignment should work for you.
    If you can establish the exact relation ship between old Sales org structure  to new Sales org structure, you can design your realignment in such a way that the new sales data will reflect the new structure.
    For this,
    1.You need to select the sales documents for which you want to change the sales org.
    2. If you want to derive them again, you can do so
    3. If you want the sales org structure elements to be replaced by new ones, you can do so.
    Following a realignment, only the new assignment is known in the information system and in planning. The characteristic values valid at the time the original posting was made can only be analyzed in line item reports. Because the existing profitability segments are changed to adhere to the new assignment, all objects assigned to those profitability segments - such as sales orders or projects - and all existing SAP documents - such as billing documents or FI documents - reflect the new assignment as well.
    For more details, check the following link. [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/7a/4c48c64a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
    Njloy
    Siva

Maybe you are looking for