Good issue (601) before stock exist (101) can be executed ?
Dear SAP Expert,
i have situation in my user, for example :
1. we have GR (101) CBU for ready to sale in posting date 11/03/2011
2. and the user want to sale that CBU in 10/03/2011
3. when i check MB5B, stock on posting date. stock only exist in 11/03/2011 and in 10/03/2011 no stock exit
4. and when user try to post GI in 10/03/2011, the transaction successfully (even though no schedule lines in SO for 10/03/2011, the user directly post via VL02N)
5. when i check MB5B, stock 10/03/2011 Begin 0, end -1 and stock 11/03/2011 Begin -1, end 0 (GR 1)
the question is it possible GI even though no stock in stock poting date 10/03/2011. note : 11/03/2011 is my system date and last stock = 1
can anyone help for this issue
Thanks for your help
Regards
Budhi
Hi Kapil,
thanks for your answer,
for this issue i'm try to simulate via MB1A with sales order consumption. when GI with VL02N document date and posting date are different (document date 11.03.2011 and posting date 10.03.2011). so comes my newbie conclusion
1. is it possible in SD, inventory movement based on document date
A : nope .. i try with same date via MB1A (document date : 10.03.2011 and posting date : 10.03.2011)
2. is it possible negative stock in my config permitted
A : i already check in that plant no negative value permitted
3. last of my thought, in SD will confirm stock only by current date and the future (estimated available). because in actual the stock already exist. so i confirm with my CO consultant, if problem will appear for GR finish good and consumption component in 11.03.2011 and GI in 10.03.2011 (still waiting this answer).
so based your answer i think it solve my answer as long no more valid commentary.
and again thank for your help
Similar Messages
-
Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt m
Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 : We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 : We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 : Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1-----STO1---- 562----- Mat. Doc.101.05.2011--
500- ST
PLANT1-----STO1---561Mat. Doc.205.05.2011--
1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo101.05.2011--99--
500- EUR
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo205.05.2011--89--
1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PMHi,
Though sap allows like this ,, the document created will be with the date of the actual posting system date. If you look into the MSEG table you will get to know this.
In theory .. this kind of practice should not be allowed .
since this is a 562 which is a individual entry may be system would have allowed.you try a 102 .
Regards, -
Whether it is possible to make auto goods issue below safety stock level
Hi SAP Gurus,
I am implementing MRP for generating stock transfer Planned orders from a Main Mother Plant to different Plants. We have defined a Safety stock level for materials at main Plant level.
There is a auto program available for generating auto goods issue against Purchase orders.
System picks up Qty as long as unrestricted stock exists for the material during auto goods issue.
System dont pick up any Qty below safety stock level (manual goods issue works below safety stock level).
We are defining safety stock to meet sudden requirements and have time for new procurement.
But it should allow us to do auto goods issue below safety stock level.
Whether this is possible and what need to be done ?
Thanks and Regards,
R.Velmurugan.Hi Velmurugan,
I don't think auto GR is a problem from safety stock. Auto Gr can be done by two ways.
1. Control key and assigning the control key in operation(Preferably in last operation)
2. In production scheduling profile you can do it. You have to assign the production scheduling profile in material master work scheduling view.
Regards,
Krishnendu. -
Restrict Goods Issue for Reserved Stock
Hi Experts,
My requirement is to restrict goods issue of stock qty which is reserved.
For that i have created checking rule and assigned to MIGO_GI because we need to consider only reservation .
Now when i create manual reservation system gives msg as per config.
e.g current unristricted stock is 100 qty
manual reservation created for 10 qty
System gives msg if i issue material more than 90 qty. It is working properly
Now pb is system is not considering reservation created by process order confimation.
I already assing checking rule with Checking grp for availability check and also set properties.
in include dependant reservation i set - x - Include all reservations.
I need to restrict goods issue for reserved stock for reservation created by process order.
Thanks in Advance
JanakHi Janak,
When a reservation is created automatically or manual, it will depicts the requirement of the material for the specific department/process. BUt it doesnot restrict or label the material as reserved. This is because the acutal requirement/consumption may vary from the reserved quantity. Also the stock still remains in the un-restricted stock and hence its open to be issued.
Now if you want restrict the stock for automatic reservation, then you can make an enhancement wherein the stock is moved to required stock type. But this will block the stock for the order even if it is not required.
Regards -
Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt
Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 : We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 : We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 : Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1 STO1 562 Mat. Doc.1 01.05.2011 500- ST
PLANT1 STO1 561 Mat. Doc.2 05.05.2011 1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1 DocumentNo1 01.05.2011 99 500- EUR
G/LAccount1 DocumentNo2 05.05.2011 89 1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PMSAP only checks if there is enough quantity in the period (month), it does not check if there is enough stock at date level.
there is no stock stored in any table for a given date. SAP would need to run the logic of MB5B to calculate the stock at a certain date, this would cause tremendous performance issues.
you either have to do this calculation yourself in a user exit, or you better train your users. -
COST GL account when goods issue - enhancement or user exist
Hello SAP exports,
There is a requirement from F&A department for different COGS GL account based on Customer Account Assignment Group value when goods issues (GI) (goods movement). Customer Account Assignment Group field name is KNVV-KTGRD. The solution is NOT possible for standard SAP SD (pricing procedure) / MM (T-Code:OBYC with GBB). Therefore, I am searching solution for enhancement.
the requirement is like following:
KNVV-KTGRD COGS GL account at goods issue
01 Domestic 818100
02 Export 818200
03 Testing - sample 818300
04 Testing - VOM 818400
05 Franchise 818500
Can you please let me know what and how this can be resolve by enhancement or user exist?
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Sylvia ChenHello,
The requirement is to provide different COGS GL account based on the Customer Account Assignment Group value(KNVV-KTGRD) when SAP performs goods issue. for example, movement type 601,
This means, when company ships goods to differnt customers, then SAP should generate different COGS GL account.
for example, when company ships goods to customer account assignment group '01' (Domestic customers), then SAP should generate COGS GL account 818100.
when company ships goods to customer account assignment group '02' (export customes), then SAP should generate COGS GL account 818200.
when company ships goods to customer account assignment group '03' (Testing - sample customers), then SAP should generate COGS GL account 818300.
the logic is following:
KNVV-KTGRD COGS GL account at goods issue
01 Domestic 818100
02 Export 818200
03 Testing - sample 818300
04 Testing - VOM 818400
05 Franchise 818500
I am not good at user exist.
Can you please provide solution with step-by-step guide?
Thank you.
Regards,
Sylvia Chen -
Post Goods Issue of Vendor Stock
Hello.
I have configured Vendor Consignment in an ECC 6.0 system. I have setup up the material, info records ,etc. I am able to create Vendor stock from a goods receipt to a PO.
I have vendor stock which I can pick for a delivery. When I post goods issue I am getting the error VL 604 The storage Location is not defined for delivery item 0010. The stock I am attempting to PGI resided in the Vendor location. How do I get the delivery to find/acknowledge the vendor location? What configuration am I missing?
Thanks In Advance for the help,
Bob BerneckHello Bob
Since Consignment stock is vendor owned material, I think you need to withdraw, bring it into your own Unrestricted use stock before PGIing it on a Delivery. Or am I mis-oversimplifying your issue? -
Problem on Goods Issue Order for stock in SU managed staging area
During Goods Issue for production Order - mvt 261 - (both in case of MIGO or MB1A) an error message is received in case of material to be consumed in a storage unit managed area (control cycle setting).
Error message - negative stock can't be created in SU managed area.
Movement type 261 is used with standard SAP configuration on movement type configuration and IM/WM interface.
Could someone help me explaining if SAP foresees the possibility of goods issue related to production order in case we set a sU managed area in the control cycle.
The expected behaviour for the system is to:
- create material document on IM
- create negative stock in the interim goods issue area (914)
- create the related the transfer orders or requirements from SU managed stating area to 914
Unfortunately the negative stock error message is received and the goods issue posting is not possible.Hello.
This topic is from 2012 and not answered yet.
I am facing exactly the same problem.
@ César: Did you find a solution for that?
Does anyone else know what this causes?
Thank you. -
About Movement type used in Goods Issue from Subcontracting Stock directly
HI SAP MM Expert,
We have transfer material to subcontractor through transfer posting using Mvt. 541 and raised subtracting challan also. Material is not returned by Subcontractor and now we want to debit Subcontractor A/c . For w we want to mkae Goods Issue (Direct consumption) from Subcontracting Stock and raised debit note subcontractor through FI. In this case what movement type & Transaction code should be used to consume stock from subcontractor account and t.code for raising debit note to subcontractor in SAP R/3 system.
Pls. suggest the process.
Regards
VKMFor subsequent adjustment to subcontracting stock use transaction MB04
If the vendor informs you that a greater or smaller quantity of the components was actually consumed than planned in the purchase order, you must post a subsequent adjustment to correct the goods issue posting. The value of the goods receipt is recalculated to include the
subsequent adjustment quantity. (SAP transaction MB04)
Subsequent Adjustment to Subcontracting PO (Move 121/544)
Negative adjustment (Vendor Consumed Less but you Consumed
more in SAP and subsequently you did minus adjustment to component consumption
in SAP)
Debit
- Raw Material Inventory (S)
Credit
- Vendor Subcontracting Charges (H)
Subsequent Adjustment to Subcontracting PO (Move 121/543)
Positive adjustment (Vendor consumed more but you consumed
less in SAP and subsequently you added further component consumption in SAP)
Credit
- Raw Material Inventory (H)
Debit
- Vendor Subcontracting Charges (S)
Thanks
DD -
How to block release item in Goods Issue if the stock is 0
Dear All,
I have an item that is placed in 2 warehouses.
For example in Warehouse 1 there are stock as much as 5
And there is No stock at all in Warehouse 2.
But when I create Goods Issue, SAP didn't block me to release the item from Warehouse 2 even though the stock is 0 so the inventory becomes negative. Beside that, there is also no warning about that.
Please let me know if there is setting I missed to block that process.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Lina YuanitaDear Lina,
Just add Michael, Lina Should tick manage inventory by Warehouse in Item master Data Tab Inventory.
HTH,
Yun Pho -
Transaction for Partial (602)reversal of goods issue (601) quantity?
Dear friends,
I am trying to reverse the 601 goods issue through cancellation with reference (601) document in MB1A transaction, but it is giving the error and it is not allowing me to reverse,
In VL09 there is possibility of reversing the entire document, but my requirement is i need to reverse partial quantity out of the issued quantity through 601.
Regards,
Archuhi archu,
please refer below link
Reverse PGI with partial quantity
regards
vijju -
Goods Issue of project stock.
Dear Experts,
I have following issue..
I am working for a client where the goods are being issued against a wbs element. In migo transaction, the selction option GOODS ISSUE for OTHER is selected. ( No reservations are being created before issue ) . Then the wbs , plant ,qty storage location is entered . the movement type 281Q is selected. In account assignment tab , if bymistakally network of other plant is selected then the system showing the message " Document OK " and allows to post it.
Please guide ....How to restrict the system not to post the goods issue to other plant's network.
Thanks & Regards,
AadityaPlease put a validation - please search the forum to get details of user exit.
-
Hi,
We had a sale to one of our customers and the invoice includes 3 lines, one of those lines is incorrect. The user made a credit memo for one of those lines but I still need to be able to reverse the goods issue for that amount.
How should I proceed since it is not letting me do a VL09 or any of the aforementioned
ThanksHello,
If you have a delivery document and that has been post goods issued, you can cancel the same with VL09. If the sale does not have delivery, you may cancel it with MIGO using Goods Issue and Article Document Number of the sale. I think SAP uses movement type 252 for the sales reversal.
Thanks,
Venu -
Goods Issue of consigmnent stock using MIGO
Hi Guru's,
I have configured stock determination group, rule header and iteam for consigment material. I have also assigned Stk. Deter. Rule in the Applications but am still unable to issue from consignment stock in my warehouse.
I have reservation and want to issue to 261K allowing the system to show that this is consignment stock and the vendor.
I have been able to do this in MB26 Pick List however I am still not able to do this in MIGO-GI. Stock determination icon is grayed out in MIGO-GI.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
thanks
DianeHi Csaba,
Thanks for your reply... I have this config already set up and I still have the issue with icon grayed out. I cannot determine consigment stock from vendor. My settings for mtce plant includes the oper 4 check during picking.
I have:
Stock determination group assigned to my plant with the following:
Rule 2000 Consume consignment, then own
Priority indicator is1 for K, 2 for F unrestricted own stock
Also movement 261 is configured for production order to consume consignment, then own.
any ideas?
Regards and thanks for your time.
Diane -
Goods Issue against outbound delivery from blocked stock
Dear All
I want to do goods issue against outbound delivery created without any reference from blocked stock of my storage location. Is there any way I can achieve this? I know normally SAP allows goods issue from unrestricted stock but my business scenario requires goods issue to be done from blocked stock against outbound delivery.
Please let me know any solution for this.
Thanks and Regards
Satish KumarHi
Check this link where similar issue has discussed and its resolved as well. Please try this and update the findings. If possible could you share the background of this strange requirement.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1541911
Thank$
Maybe you are looking for
-
How many apple TVs can you have on one network 5, 10, 15, infinite?
I have an application where there are many rooms and I would like to be able to use Airplay in each room, can I buy 10 or more Apple TV units and put them all over my house on my wireless network and be able to airplay to any one of them? What is the
-
Is there a preferred way of conecting two VGA monitors to a Mini? All the other discussions I've seen outside of the apple fourms are "advice" from folks who don't even own a Mini let alone have successfully hooked up two VGAs. Thank You -W
-
Smartforms in MM, SD, PP
How to know the standard smartforms in MM, SD, PP modules?
-
Can I access local files?
I am writing an application using Adobe Air that will have to utilize and store media files locally on a user's computer. My marketing team now believes that a downloadable application that will be installed on a user's computer will be a dealbreake
-
How do I eject the g drive once the backup is complete?
I just backed up my laptop to an external hard drive. Instructions say to "eject" the g drive prior to disconnecting the cord between the hard drive and the laptop. How do I do that - I pressed the ESC button but that did not work.