GR-Non valuated flag is checked when using Order as account assignment Cat

Hi,
We are creating a Purchase Req using a Work order, but under the valutaion tab GR-non Valuated is checked and greyed out so the user can't uncheck it. I want user to select just the Goods Receipt Check but not GR-Non Val.
I already chekced the configuration in OME9 and both are not checked . Also we are not using multiple accout assignment there is only one account assignment element which is that Work order number.
please advice...
thank you!

what is the account assignment category in your PR? if it is coming as checked by default then somebody must have ticked it in SPRO-MM-Pur-account assignment-Maintain Account assignment categories---there select your relevant account assignment category and you will see GR Non Val indicator TICKED, if you don't want it to be dafult in PR , remove it.
But first check why it has been ticked there , it is possible that based on business need all servies / stock purchase under that acnt *** cat need not to be valuated.
Yogesh

Similar Messages

PO: GR Non Valuated Flag DEFAULT

Hi Everybody,
here the current situation:
- P & Q as account assignment is used in the PO
- Q has valuated GR per default, meaning the flag is NOT set in the PO item --> Fine
- P has non valuated default, meaning the flag is set per default
The problem is with the P:
One business wants to have the GRNonVal Flag set as default in the PO creation, one business not.
Is there a possibility to let's say more detail this function, not just in the config of the Acc *** Category?
Any ideas are hightly appreciated!!
Cheers!
M*
Edited by: Golgo13 on Jun 12, 2008 4:34 PM

hi buddy
make two plants for two bussiness
in one plant make all material types non valuated so that u can use that plant for the GRNONVAL
and other for valuated bussiness
plz reply if useful
regards
kunal

When using my Gmail account, I often (many times a day) get "Unresponsive Script" errors.

when using my Gmail account I often (many times daily) get "Unresponsive Script" errors. I have to hit "CONTINUE" button to continue.

Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
You can try to reset Firefox and create a new profile.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/reset-firefox-easily-fix-most-problems
See also:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_crashes
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firefox+crashes

Check while creating PR with account assignment K

Hi Gurus,
Can I put a check while creating PRs for account assignment category K, that only statistical order number range is allowed.
In other words, user should not be allowed to put any internal order other than statistical order in PR, while creating it with account assignment category K..
Thanks in Advance,
Vikash

Hi,
You can check on business transaction RMBA - it's the purchase requisition. Set it to prerequisites and for the validation select the order type (it's better than a number range - I believe you use different order types for real/statistical I/O) from AUFK (you will see this structure as available, when creating a validation). If you do use the same order type, then check on I/O itself COBL-AUFNR.
Regards,
Eli

Partial Delivery when the complete delivery flag is checked in Sales Order

We do the ATP check in APO when we create a sales order in R/3. We have "complete delivery" flag checked in Sales Order. But when we create batch orders say may be of 20, one of 20 is confirming with partial delivery.
We thought the issue is with ATP locking and we increased the re-attempts, but invain. We still have this partial confirming problem.
Appreciate your co-operation.
Thanks,
Sarath.

Have you maintained the following setings in R3:
Material Blocks in R3:
MenuPath: SAP Customizing Implementation Guide ® Sales and Distribution ® Basic Functions ® Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements ® Availability Check ® Availability Check with ATP Logic or Against Planning ® Define Material Block For Other Users
Global Settings in APO for Availability Check:
MenuPath: SPRO>APO>GATP>General Settings>Maintain Global Settings for Product Availabilty
Questions for you:
(1)R3--Does the Availability CHecking Group you are using for your material and the initiator-A has the block checked.
(2)APO-- Has the TQA box checked in the global settings for Availability in APO
(3)Also what happens when AVAILABILITY CHECK is done manually for one of the partial confirmed order with Complete Delivery indicator set.
Regards
Kumar Ayyagari
null

Why can't I connect one Windows 8.1 PC to other Windows 8.1 PCs in my workgroup when using a Microsoft Account?

I finally decided to convert some of my local accounts to Microsoft Accounts on my Windows 8.1 PCs. Big mistake to this point.
I have two PC's with the same Microsoft Account set up, neither PC can browse to the other or map a drive through browsing.
I'm not using a homegroup. My daughter has one setup on her laptop and desktop, and I don't want my PC's on her homegroup. Until Microsoft makes it possible to have 2 homegroups on the same subnet, this is not an option.
The local accounts on both PC's have no problem browsing, mapping, etc. I can connect to the other PC's just fine using local accounts, so I know physical connectivity isn't an issue, neither is my anti-virus or really anything else system wide on either
computer.
I just can't attach automatically using a Microsoft Account. I have to manually map a drive every logon/reboot.
I have also found that running a logon script doesn't work. The drives will not map automatically.
The Microsoft Account users can map a drive using "Connect using different credentials." However, the credentials don't hold across reboots.
I can manually (using either a Microsoft Account or a local account) map a drive using "net use" which then opens up all of my mapped drives and allows for browsing to the other PC. However, this doesn't work across reboots/logons either.
Entering credentials in the Credentials Manager (Whether I use the Microsoft Account credentials or one of the local user credentials) doesn't work across reboots either.
Yes, I have the same Microsoft Account setup on both PCs. I have tried giving them both Admin and Standard user rights on both PCs.
I have turned off UAC as recommended in some posts.
Again - This problem is ONLY related to MICROSOFT ACCOUNTS, not local accounts.
I have put a batch file on the desktop with a "net use" statement in it to connect as a work around, but this is very annoying and truly unacceptable. Is there anyway to make this work seamlessly without running a batch file or something else where
the password exists on the PC in clear text?
I can't find other posts asking this question - am I the only one who is trying to do this? What memo did I miss?
Thanks for any help!

Hello Steve Hengen,
I apologize for the delay.
I have test in my own environment and can normally map the network driver when logon as Microsoft account.
Do you check the option Reconnect at logon?
If you use Connect using different credentials, do you check the option Remenber my credentials?
Please take a look at the following article about map a network drive.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-HK/windows-8/create-shortcut-to-map-network-drive
Best regards,
Fangzhou CHEN
Fangzhou CHEN
TechNet Community Support

Display color profile bug when using the fast account switch from a guest account to an admin account (and vice versa)

Hey,
I'm sometimes using a guest account on my MBP (unibody late 2008 2,4 GHz Core2Duo, 4GB DDR3 running OSX 10.9.4 on an OCZ 128GB SSD) for a more distraction-free working space and I noticed right away a disturbing bug:
Using the fast account switch (upper right hand corner of the screen) in Mavericks from an admin account to log into a guest account (or vice versa) produces, after the fancy rotating cube animation, some strange distortion of the desktop background happens (lasting approx. 2 sec.). After that the color profile of the display is changed into an usable but ugly one, which is disturbing while working with pictures. When checking the color profile in the pref pane, the standard "display" profile is said to be active (it's the one I use) but still the colors aren't the same. Selecting another profile and re-selcting the desired one doesn't fix the problem. Switching back to the other account with the fast switching leaves the colors altered. Logging out and deleting the guest account seems to the problem for the remaining admin account. Rebooting and logging in to either of the accounts (admin or guest) from the standard account selecting page at booting shows the normal color profile.
Is it a general bug or is their anything a can do to prevent this problem (other than never using the fast switching)?
Thanks for your advice.
Mael

I cannot agree more with your comments! What a way to frustrate your customers!
I have been having an issue with iCloud on Mac where it kept asking me for my password and sometimes would, sometimes would not continue to access my iCloud mail. Today it just refused to connect to iCloud mail.
I looked in the Mail, Contacts and Calendars in my MacBook Pro settings and discovered that 2 iCloud accounts were present. One with my original Apple ID (a gmail address) and a second with my new iCloud email ( an @me.com address). Having deleted the second account, using the new @me.com address everything is working fine.
So from my viewpoint when I moved over to iCloud I was asked to sign in with my Apple ID (the gmail address) then to create an @me.com address. However, as far as I can see all sign ins to the new @me.com account on Macbook, iPhone and iPad need to be done through the old Apple ID (the gmail address). Is that confusing and just plain crazy???
Further, after creating the new @me.com address I soon found out that this is apparently now forever bound to my old Apple ID and cannot be changed. I mean why can't I delete the iCloud account and start anew with a different @me.com address??? Also, as everybody using iCloud must create an @me.com address why on earth can I not get rid of my old gmail address and have my entire Apple ID accessed through the new @me.com address? Creating a whole new Apple ID will not solve this as we are unable to transfer purchases between accounts.
Apple products are great IMHO, but they do seem to not think things through in a very big way sometimes......

Issues with sending mail when using 2 email accounts - possible bug?

Hi all,
Having issues with trying to send email from the 3g iPhone. I have 2 IMAP acounts set up on the phone, one
which works fine but when I try to create mail from the primary account as soon as I hit send it exits the mail program and goes back to the home screen.
Both IMAP accounts have identical settings apart from the username and email address. On the primary account there is no sent messages folder on the iPhone whilst there is on the account that works. I've had a look in the advanced settings and it is programmed to store sent messages in the local sent folder which doesn't exist. I've tried selecting it to store in a IMAP folder as I thought maybe it was crashing as the local folder wasn't there but it has the same result.
Have deleted the account and entered the settings back in again to try to coax it to create the local sent folder but cake up with the same problem.
Suggestions are welcome.

You have their SMTP servers mixed up, go to Mail>Preferences>Accounts>Outgoing Mail Server (SMTP), click on the server then choose Edit SMTP Servers and select the correct one for each account. Then check the Use Only This Server box

User Status automatically checked when a order is scheduled twice or more

Hello Friends
We created a User Status called "Rescheduled" for Work Orders
We want that the system flag this status automatically when a order is scheduled twice or more in CM33
Is that possible?
Edited by: Davison Tadeu Avigo on Jul 14, 2011 4:23 PM

Davison Tadeu Avigo
Yes it would be possible, but you would need to develop a solution for this..
PeteA

My display is corrupted when using the admin account

I have like 16 bit color when I am using my admin account. When I use any other account the display is fine.

Open the Universal Access pane of System Preferences, click on Seeing, set the display to use Black & White, turn off all the checkboxes except for the one relating to assistive devices, which doesn't matter, and move the contrast slider all the way to the left.
(20928)

SQL Insert from "Select Query" Not Work when use Order By

Hai every body...
I have a problem with T-SQL. I use SQL Server 2012 Express with SP2 on Windows 7 32-bit SP1.
This is the problem
-- first, create table
create table dtoth.tableA (
id_data TINYINT PRIMARY KEY,
kd_data VARCHAR(20),
nm_data VARCHAR(200)
-- then, insert values
INSERT INTO dtoth.tableA VALUES (0,'100.001','KAS');
INSERT INTO dtoth.tableA VALUES (1,'110.001','BANK');
INSERT INTO dtoth.tableA VALUES (2,'120.001','PIUTANG DAGANG');
INSERT INTO dtoth.tableA VALUES (3,'121.001','PIUTANG GIRO');
INSERT INTO dtoth.tableA VALUES (4,'130.001','PERSEDIAAN BARANG DAGANGAN');
-- then, i create a temporary table
create table dtoth.temp_tableA (
kd_data VARCHAR(20),
nm_data VARCHAR(200)
-- then, i create a store procedure to call data from temporary table
CREATE procedure dtoth.report
AS
BEGIN
DELETE FROM dtoth.temp_tableA;
INSERT INTO dtoth.temp_tableA SELECT kd_data, nm_data FROM dtoth.tableA ORDER BY kd_data desc;
SELECT * FROM dtoth.temp_tableA;
END
GO
When i execute the the store procedure with
EXEC dtoth.report;
the result is not accurate like this (kd_data not sorted desc):
I want the column "kd_data" sort descending because i use ORDER BY kd_data DESC in insert statement on the store procedure.
By the way, if i execute code like :
SELECT kd_data, nm_data FROM dtoth.tableA ORDER BY kd_data desc;
the result is correct like this
So, what solution for my code in the store procedure ?
Thanks.

to get the data sorted, you should order by in your select in the stored procedure
sorting while inserting does not guarenatee order..
remove the order by in insert statement and put that in the select statement
so, your procedure should be
-- then, i create a store procedure to call data from temporary table
CREATE procedure dtoth.report
AS
BEGIN
DELETE FROM dtoth.temp_tableA;
INSERT INTO dtoth.temp_tableA SELECT kd_data, nm_data FROM dtoth.tableA;
SELECT * FROM dtoth.temp_tableA ORDER BY kd_data desc;
END
GO
Hope it Helps!!

Error when using my netflix account trying to use help

going on to netflix is fine....cannot use help or account info nothing but the movies

Hey au.gusto,
Thanks for the question. Keynote Remote utilizes the Wi-Fi connection of your MacBook Pro and your iPhone, so you’ll want to make sure they are connected to the same network:
Keynote '09: Using Keynote Remote
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH6251
Thanks,
Matt M.

GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

Hi,
We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
Regards,
Srivatsan

Hi Srivatsan ?
In ECC, you have a configuration point :
Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
Kind regards,
Yann

Valuated GR not allowed in case of multiple account assignment

Hi Friends,
While creating Asset PO with multiple account assignment categories from SC
i received the following error message in RZ20.
PO 0030065837: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
PurchOrder 0030065837: Purchase order still contains faulty items
PO 0030065837: Valuated GR not allowed in case of multiple accoun t assignment
PurchOrder 0030065837: Transfer failed
Now the PO status is error in process
Can any one help on this issue...
Thank You
Shrinivas

Hi shrinivas,
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP
can you tell me whether you have that option of selecting or deselecting the GR nonvaluated in PO creation(EBP).If it is there falg it and reprocess the Sc
hope this will help
regards
subbu

Default the GR based IV check in PO based on account assignment category

Hi Experts,
We have the below business requirement based on GR based IV check in the PO. We knows that this can be automatically defaulted by using the two master records.
1.Vendor master,
2.Purchase info record.
But our cilents needs this field to be automated based on the account assignment category. Because lot of vendors are created without the activiation of this check box also they do not want to go by mass upload transaction to change the master records.
They want only based on the account assignement category. For example if a PO is created using the account assignement K then this GR based IV is selected automatically.
Kindly adivce any configuration setting is available to fullfill this requiremennt.

Hi,
unfortunately the GR based IV can not be set in OME9 (in customizing).
In ME21N, if it is normal PO, GR Based IV indicator is not set. But if
item category = D, GR Based IV indicator is automatically set by
system.
Best regards
Erika

GR-Non valuated flag is checked when using Order as account assignment Cat

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for