GR process for TAS item category

The issue is:
We have issued lot of PO as drop shipment kind of scenario. ie. not relevant for GR. There are many sales order open PR lying with schedule line which is not valid for GR.
We want to do the GR process for them. when i try to do a GR it says "purchase order has no items." I need to convert all these as sales order stock.
Can someone guide me, how this can be achieved?
Thanks

Yes it is possible. In the IM/WM interface tables, in the second table, you can vary the process according to stock status. See the third column.
LogisticsExecution \ Warehouse Management \ Interfaces \ Inventory Management \ Define Movement Type
Following is the config. help text for the field
Special Stock Indicators for Whse Mgmt
Use
In the Materials Management system you can post different transactions using one movement type. For example, posting goods receipt to unallocated stock or goods receipt to
stock in quality inspection.
These transactions are treated differently by the system on the basis of this indicator. Together with other indicators of a movement type in the Materials Management system, this indicator is used to correctly allocate a movement type in the Warehouse Management system so that the transaction can be posted accordingly.
Regards,
Nick

Similar Messages

Diff between TAN and TAS item category

hi
wht is the diffrence between TAN and TAS item category and how to configure during implementation stage.
Thnaks

Hello,
Main difference between TAN and TAS is, TAN is relevent for delivey and TAS is not relevent for delivery.
TAN is used in normal business process and TAS is used in third party process.
In the item category determination it will be like
OR -- NORM--> TAN --> TAS
OR --> BANS --> TAS.
Prase

Processing for each item SDRQCR21 flag

Hello all,
What does mean the flag Processing for each item for ECC report SDRQCR21?
Thanks in advance.
Januario Faria

Please read sap note 998102.
Here the following is written:
"Important information:
    o With the 'Processing per item' option, the collective
       (summarized) requirements are no longer processed. Materials
       which belong to an atp group which summarizes the requirements
       are simply not checked for consistency."

Deliery block sales orders report for TAS items

Hi,
User requirement is need a report which gives list of sales orders which have the delivery block in sales order schedule lines.( of third party items TAS)
I found V.14 and VA14L to find out the sales orders which give the list of sales orders which are blocked for outbound delivery (in schedule line delivery block).
However, for third party items sales order with item category TAS are not coming in the report of V.14.
I think the reason is because of the third party items are not relevant for delivery hence v.14 report not fetching the data of third party orders(TAS), is this my understanding is correct?
If the user is insisting on for even third party items also they want a report which should give the list of sales order which are blocked for delivery block then what is the best way to advise the user?
And does it make any sense putting delivery block for third party items ? because we are not delivering the goods to customer and even if you put delivery block we can’t stop PR,PO and MIGO and MIRO etc .
Thanks,

is this my understanding is correct?
Absolutely correct.
they want a report which should give the list of sales order which are blocked for delivery block
Since the inventory / stock of material would be handled out of SAP, what is the need to set a delivery block. Even if you set delivery block, vendor is going to deliver the material.
what is the best way to advise the user?
Convince the user what they are expecting in SAP are logically incorrect. When the material is being delivered by a vendor, what is the use if you set delivery block for this item? What they are going to achieve.
And does it make any sense putting delivery block for third party items ?
Definitely, no
G. Lakshmipathi

Setting for new item category

Hi friends,
Company's requirement is to Create new Item Category and respective settings for normal business process.
please let me know, what all the mandetory setting which i need to do for normal business process.
As i know , item category determination in VOV4.
please tell me, the main mandetory setting which should be maintained.
thanks in advance.
VARMA

Dear Ravi Varma,
Please copy the standard ITEM CATEGORY based on your scenario and then save in VOV6.
Assign the same for your document type in VOV4.
Another important thing you have to keep in mind is you have to include this NEW ITEM CATEGORY in the copy controls as well.
(in VTLA & VTFL)
Please check and revert back.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

CRM Availability Check not working for certain Item Category

Hi there,
I have a situation where for certain order type/item category combinations, the availability check on the same material is not working.
The check is set up to happen in SAP ECC.
I have checked the config. under SPRO->CRM->Basic Functions->Availability Check->Availability Check using SAP ECC
as per many SDN posts on this, and everything looks fine.
The new item category, which was a copy of an existing one, works (i.e. gives availability) for certain order types, but not others.
If I create the same order directly in ECC, it works correctly every time.
I searched the code (from consultants who set it up originally) and can see nothing specific to the order type/ item category.
I also put a breakpoint on AVAILABILTY_CHECK function module in SAP ECC - it is not being hit, in the case where check is not successful.
Breakpoints in MV45AFZZ (Sales Order userexit) also not being hit, but they are hit for the Order/item category combination when it works successfully.
Any suggestions on where else this could be configured would be appreciated!
thanks,
David

Hi David,
One 'simple' reason for this could be that the copied item category does not have the
ATP Profile set up in the item category in the IMG. Make sure you have an ATP profile assigned in the area 'ATP Profile' in the item category.
Please see as well the SCN Wiki link:
Availability Check CRM-BTX-BF-ATP - CRM - SCN Wiki
Best regards
Christophe

Disable input (Grey color) for the Amount field for TANN item category item

Hi All,
I want to disable the input of pricing field in Sales tab in VA01/VA02 for the TANN item category line.
Now I can ZERO the pricing field, but cannot disable the input.
Please help.
Thank you very much.
Terry

I've done by User Exit MV45AFZZ
form userexit_field_modification.
Thanks.

Net price for consignment item category( urgent) in ME21n

Hi all,
while creating PO in me21n, net price is being displayed for the standard item category but net price is not comming while maintaining item category as consignment.
if the item category(ekko-pstyp)is consignment (i.e we have to put 'K' in the item category field in ME21n),then how can i display the net price in the net price field of ME21n.
The net price is comming in ME21n when item category = standard.but net price is not comming when item category = consignment.what is the reason?
plz let me know if there is any enhancement or exit for this net price to be displayed if the item category is consignment.
plz let me know what r the ways, i can display the net price in ME21n for the consignment item category?it is urgent.
any idea is highly appreaciated.
Thanks & Regards
pabitra

As given in your other post, please find the info below.
Hi Pabitra
I guess the price is taken from the material info record. Here the item category might be a part of the access sequence.
To get the same info, follow the below steps:
1. Go to Transaction: MEK3
2. Give the condition type as PB00
3. Click on Key Combination from the application toolbar
4. Select Material Info Record
5. Next selection screen shows you the list of mandatory fields. If item category also exists here, give '0' & 'K' for Item category and other fields like vendor number, purchase orgranization, material.
6. Execute.
7. In the next screen if you can see only one record for item category '0', it means that condition record for item category 'K' is not maintained.
Hence the price will not be extracted.
Hope the above info helps you.
Kind Regards
Eswar

Account assignment question (for subcontracting item category)

Hello
Is it possible to have a account assignment category with a consumption posting indicator V work with a subcontracting item category L?
Our scenario is that a SD item category TAB auto generates a Subcontracting PO with account assignment M and item category L.
The problem with account assignment M is that it references sales order, and does not propose BOM component material/quantity, like a standalone subcontracting movement (541 reference to PO)
We want to issue components to the subcontractor referencing a PO, and maintain visibility thru ME2O (Which account assignment M wont allow).
Is this possible ?
I tried tweaking the account assignment category M by changing the consumption posting indicator to V.
This allowed me to do the subcontracting issue 541 movement referencing a PO.
However, I got 2 accounting errors at MIGO.
No direct postings possible to G/L account 03-010
I then changed the FS00 settings to allow direct postings, but got the next error and was stuck. I guess if these accounts are postable, my problem is solved but I dont know how to do that!
Acct. 03-010 for trans./event key BSX, postable directly
If anyone is knowledgeable on account assignments or knows how I can solve these, I would greatly appreciate your input.
Regards
Ken

Thanks for replying again, Gopala.
Let me clarify, the SAP error I am receiving is at MIGO, following the successful transfer posting at MB1B (mtype 541 referencing the PO number. If I can get the proper account postings at MIGO (as in a standalone MM subcon scenario) here, my problem is resolved.
When I hit post at MIGO (Finished Product mov type +101/Component reduction is -543 O) I receive the error "Acct. 03-010 for trans./event key BSX, postable directly " I then goto FS00 (G/L accounts) and uncheck the 'post automatically only' box. But then when I goto re-post at MIGO, I get the message
"No direct postings possible to G/L account 03-010"
So I am stuck in this circular error.
Is this correctable?
Thanks Again
Ken

Net price for consignment item category in ME21n (urgent)

Hi all,
while creating PO in me21n, net price is being displayed for the standard item category but net price is not comming while maintaining item category as consignment.
if the item category(ekko-pstyp)is consignment (i.e we have to put 'K' in the item category field in ME21n),then how can i display the net price in the net price field of ME21n.
The net price is comming in ME21n when item category = standard.but net price is not comming when item category = consignment.what is the reason?
plz let me know if there is any enhancement or exit for this net price to be displayed if the item category is consignment.
plz let me know what r the ways, i can display the net price in ME21n for the consignment item category?it is urgent.
any idea is highly appreaciated.
Thanks & Regards
pabitra

Hi Pabitra
I guess the price is taken from the material info record. Here the item category might be a part of the access sequence.
To get the same info, follow the below steps:
1. Go to Transaction: MEK3
2. Give the condition type as PB00
3. Click on Key Combination from the application toolbar
4. Select Material Info Record
5. Next selection screen shows you the list of mandatory fields. If item category also exists here, give '0' & 'K' for Item category and other fields like vendor number, purchase orgranization, material.
6. Execute.
7. In the next screen if you can see only one record for item category '0', it means that condition record for item category 'K' is not maintained.
Hence the price will not be extracted.
Hope the above info helps you.
Kind Regards
Eswar

Receipt process for damaged items when account assignment exists

HOwdy all,
Assume we have a PO for 100 items at $x. The PO is account assigned to an order (work order, production order etc).
When we are doing the receipt step, we find that 50 of the items are damaged. What is the normal process in SAP for this. I know for stock (i..e no account assignment) that we would receipt into GR - Blocked Stock. However, when receipting for an item with an account assignment this does not appear possible - is this true?
YOur best suggestions appreciated...

Returns PO is required when the PO against which the material was initially received is closed. Means PO qty equal to GR qty equal to IR qty and payment is already made but later it is found that some material is not as per required quality and vendor is agreeing to replace the material. then a seperate returns PO is required as you cannot return with reference to the original PO.

Automatic PR creation for stock items (Category - L)

Hi All,
My requirement is as follows:
When I create PM orders for stock item, system generates a reservation number.
But the actual qty is sytem for such items are less than planned qty or NIL qty.
How to create PR's for such items automatically by system ?
Is MRP run required to be activated for such items (i.e: maintenance of MRP views in material master) or any other way to do it for stock items (L) ?
If so, what all fields need to be filled in material master?
Is there a way for doing MRP run only for material type ERSA (spare parts) or only against reservation numbers created through maintenance orders or against MRP controller?
Kindly post your valuable feedback.
Thanks in advance and best regards.
Kannan J

Hi,
For automatic p.o creation, you can use reorder point.
In material master mrp1 view, use mrp type VB, reorder level ex. 50 pc.
Maintain lot size HB, maintain max stock level 100 pc.
When the requirement comes it will consume from stock. If the stock goes below reorder ponit(50), it will create planning file entry.
When you run mrp (MD01), it will automatically create p.o.
But without running mrp, system can not create p.o
With that you can maintain your stock.
Hope it will help.
Regards,
Dharma

ICR process for Open item recon.(003) - Report Display issue

Hi All,
I am facing a problem in the data reconciliation report display.The document number "1212121212" doesn't not exist in the SAP system.But "1212121212" is used as the reference number in the another document which is created in the SAP.
Legacy data file.
RCOMP RASSC       DOCNR                ATYPE        RACCT      RTCUR     TSL
L001     U001     1212121212     C     CCU001     USD     200
In the data selection process, i am using the following inputs.
Company code - L001, U001.
Vendor - CCU001,CCL001.
Customer - CCU001,CCL001.
In the data assignment process, i am using the following inputs.
Company - L001, U001.
Trading Partner - L001, U001.
Rule - 300, 400.
Rule - 300 config.
200     DOCNR     Document Number     Equal     DOCNR     Document Number
Rule - 400 config.
200     DOCNR     Document Number     Equal     REFNR     Reference Number
In the reconciliation report display (right side bottom page),
U001->L001->Payables or other way around L001->U001->Receivables (Top Left side).In the either of the two display am able to see two items.
first item (not expected in the report display, bcoz there is no relevant data present in the legacy file).
TR.PT PRT.DOC.NO PR.CUR Amount DGC Difference Reference no
U001 1700036236      USD       500       USD   500          TEST
The first item exist in the SAP and it is getting selected during the data selection process.
second item (reconciled and expected in the report display)
L001     U001     1212121212     C     CCU001     USD     200
Kindly help.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Karthik

Hi Ralph,
Yes we are having two company codes.your understanding on this point is rite.
I am using the standard file upload functionality from the presentation server for uploading the non-sap company data.since in the earlier thread i had explained very detail level, so now had made it short.
The only issue that I am having is that I have just one line item in my upload file and it is from non sap company L001 for trading partner u001. File gets loaded (data selected 1 correctly), Then after all the steps when I am in the last step (reconciliation) I see that line getting reconciled with other line available in U001 with zero difference. That looks good because it is matching as per my rule. but I am also seeing some other open items in U001 that are also getting reconciled with no lines in file with difference equal to their values. They should not show up in the bottom part of reconciliation part at all as they are still open in U001 and should not get reconciled until I put their offsetting lines in upload file from L001. So they should stay at the top right side in simple words I am seeing open items as well in reconciliation portion bottom one even I do not have any lines to reconcile them and they are showing a balance in them as well.
Thanks in advance.
Let me know, if you need any more details.
Regards,
Karthik

What's the difference between text and value type for SO item category?

Dears,
Could anybody help me on this question?
Many thanks!
Regards,
Shiliang

Hi Shiliang,
In a Bill Of Material the main item is a composite item which represents what is being sold to the customer. For eg. a computer typically would consist of Monitor, Keyboard,mouse and CPU, speakers. Here computer refers the collection of all these items which are physically existing and basically items present in our inventory ( Value Items ). Where as computer is just a text item meant to describe the collection.
Also to add the for Usage we use it as text sometimes, which is used to say the item has been authenticated by the quality dept and we print " Tested " on it or these days all the items come out with unique article numbers for identification purpose. So we use this usage as text.
Hope it adds. Pl reward if useful.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore

ICR process for Open item recon.(003)

Hi All,
I facing the problem "Although the field ATYPE contains the value V for vendor documents all uploaded data records in table FBICRC003A are posted with the vendor account in the field RCUST " this is one of the symptom in the note 1154899,but even after applying this note 1154899 the issue is not resolved.So in my legacy file am having both vendor and customer in the same file for the legacy company code L001.
I am referring to the structure FBICRC_S_UPLOAD provided by SAP for uploading the data.Please find below is the data format.
RCOMP   RASSC     DOCNR          ATYPE     RACCT     RTCUR     TSL
L001     U001     1700036235     C     CCU001     USD     400
L001     U001     1800000795     V     CCU001     USD     300-
Because of this issue, my Vendor record is getting displayed in the U001->L001->Payables area along with the customer record.So this seems to be incorrect, bcoz of the above mentioned problem.
I also debugged the standard class 'CL_FBICRC_SERVICES' and the method 'UPLOAD_DATA'
where the below mentioned lines are causing the problem of copying the vendor data into customer field.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING needs to be clear, but it is not happening in the standard code.
Please let me know the solution to this problem.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Karthik

Hello Karthik,
Please check and make sure that you also implement note 1270782. You may also simply do a note search with the terms ICR and UPLOAD_DATA to get all corrections for this data transfer method.
Best regards,
Ralph

GR process for TAS item category

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for