Grand Total is Incorrect

Hi,
I am having some problems using Grand Total on calculated columns (presentation calculations) with a TOP 25 page filter.
I basically have my calculated columns filtered by the Current Week repository variable, and then I want to add a filter to show only the top 25. That all works fine, but the grand total on my report is showing the total of all records, not just the top 25. If I add a normal (non-calculated) column from my subject area, the grand total works fine with the top 25 filter.
Is there any explanation or workaround for this?

Hello!
I had the same problem, and this fix solve one part of my problem with grand totals.
The other one is not solved:
We have a strong request to compare total_year measures against part_year measures (dinamicaly navigated with dashboard prompt).
I have a report in dashboard which includes 3 measures:
- plan_year_total (which is created in admin as measure of sales and at time_dimension logical level is year - and this works ok)
- sales_part_of_the year (which is navigated through dashboard prompt between)
- plan_part_of_the_year (which is navigated through dashboard prompt between)
Problem is when I want to show share in grand total row like:
plan_year_total / sales_part_of_the year
It gives out totaly wrong result.
Is there any other idea or workaround?
Gorazd

Similar Messages

  • Grand Totals are incorrect

    I have two facts : Income & Forecast
    I have two dimensions : Date & Organisation
    I have a report for 2007 that shows the following data:
    Week Income Forecast
    Week1 100 100
    Week2 100 100
    Week3 100 100
    Week4 100 100
    Week5 100 100
    GTotal 10000 10000
    I know that the grand total is wrong as I have NOT selected the report based total, so it is totaling for all years, not the year that I have filtered for.
    When I change to report based totals I get:
    Week Income Forecast
    Week1 100 0
    Week2 100 0
    Week3 100 0
    Week4 100 0
    Week5 100 0
    GTotal 500 0
    The foreign keys and joins for income and forecast are the same.
    Any ideas ?
    Ross

    Your forecast values rollup properly if you do not have the grand total? Add another criteria which would basically do the summation of the forecast and the amount values(add filters depending on what you have in the first criteria). Combine it with the first criteria using union all. Check whether this produces your output properly(if the grand total gets interspersed with the data, add some logic to make it appear at the place you want). This will help us understand where it is going wrong.
    Thanks,
    Venkat
    http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com

  • Grand Total in Dimension Hierarchy

    Hello,
    I still have problem to get the correct Grand total. The Dimension "Project" goes down to Level 4  (some projects only to Level 3). First I solved summing up a calculated measure  with Isleaf() or SUM (currentmember.children).
    Then the grand total always summed up all members and not those which where filtered in Excel. Here i found the current solution with VisualTotals().  But now i still the problem that when expanding sublevels in excel the Grand total is wrong
    again:
    CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[Prognosekosten] AS
    CASE
    WHEN IsLeaf([Projekt].[Projekt Hierarchie].currentmember)
    THEN ...calculation....
    WHEN [Projekt].[Projekt Hierarchie].currentmember is [Projekt].[Projekt Hierarchie].[ALL]
    THEN sum(except(  VisualTotals(axis(0)), [Projekt].[Projekt Hierarchie].[All]), [Measures].[Prognosekosten])
    ELSE Sum([Projekt].[Projekt Hierarchie].currentmember.children, [Measures].[Prognosekosten])
    END

    Hi Wolfgang,
    According to your description, you create calculated member to calculate the grand total, now the problem is that the grand total is incorrect when you filter the data in Microsoft Excel, right? In this case, please refer to the links below which might helpful
    for you.
    http://wildwordz.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/not-so-grand-totals-in-ssas-cubes/
    http://vnu10.blogspot.com/2011/01/mdx-grand-total-sub-total.html
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Grands totals for % Columns coming incorrect in pivot view .

    Hello ,
    I have the below scenario . Iam trying to get the calculated grand total for % column . I tired several ways ...like report aggregates enabled in instanceconfig,tried creating cal colum using physical columns as well as logical columns in RPD , changing the aggregation rule. The row wise values (%) are coming correct but iam unable to get correct % grand total (36.8%) instead iam just getting the sum of the % total ( 83.3%) . I have tried the above options in my previous reports and those conditions work perfectly right but for this report they are not able to . kindly please let me know if anybody has a solution for this issue .
    Department ...USD CAD Variance (USD/CAD)*100
    XYZ 10 20 50%
    ABC 25 75 33.3%
    Total 35 95 36.8% ( 35/95)
    Thanks
    Karthik

    Just to cross check
    Do you have following tag in your instanceconfig file ? if its not there then you may encounter grand total incorrect calculations.
    <ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled>

  • Incorrect Grand total

    Can anyone pls tell how to fix the issue of Incorrect Grand total ?
    Especially for calculated values.If any formula is applied then the grand total should also be executed with the same formulas.
    Pls help

    Thanks Madhan and MMA.
    Madhan
    I've already tried adding <ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled> and even after restarting the services no use. My server version is 10.1.3.2.1.Is there any alternate solution?
    MMA
    I tried with Server complex aggregate also.But no use.
    Pls suggest if there is any alternate solution.

  • Incorrect GRAND TOTAL (with COUNT DISTINCT)

    Hi,
    I'm getting wrong results in the GRAND TOTAL of a COUNT DISTINCT measure column.
    I have 5 distinct customers in Paris and 10 distinct customers in NYC, I want the grand total to retrieve the sum of both, that's 15.
    But OBIEE is calculating the distinct customers for all cities, so if there are customers in both Paris and NYC the result is wrong.
    This is the result I'm getting:
    City Number_Distinct_Customers
    Paris 5
    NYC 10
    GRAND TOTAL 12
    12 is the number of all the distinct customers.
    The correct GRANT TOTAL should be 5+10=15
    Thanks
    Regards

    So just as a weird question...from a business standpoint, what does the "15" mean?
    It's not a count of distinct customers, which is what this measure is supposed to be.
    If I were to come up with a business description for what's being described, it's "a count of distinct customers by city....summed up so that it is no longer a count of distinct customers". What and/or how exactly would anyone use such a number?
    Not trying to be a pain, just trying to figure out how this would be used.
    Thanks,
    Scott

  • Incorrect grand total when drilling down

    Hi,
    I have a simple crosstab report showing budgets and costs against consortia. The consortia names are the row headers.
    There is a heiracrhy of practices within consortia.
    I have a 'grand total' calculation at the bottom.
    When I drill down from any consortium to the practices within it, the total is fine - even if I drill down from all the consortia, as long as I drill down from each consortium one at a time.
    BUT - if I drill down to practice level in one go (from the heading bar above the consortium names), the total is doubled!
    Has anyone else had this problem? Any solutions?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    The total is doubled because the level1 itself is a total of level2. So, the report will looks like this:
    Consortium 100
    Practice1 50
    Practice2 50
    The solution, I would suggest is first have subtotals for each change in Consortium and then add a calculation as SUM(subtotal). Dont display the subtotals.
    This is just a workaround though.
    Hope this helps,
    Yogini

  • Wrong SSAS Grand Total Value Monthly Value base on Weekly Value

    Dear All, 
    I Have calculated measures in my cube base on Weekly and Base on Monthly and different
    Template Base .
    For grand Total Weekly is fine but for Monthly is bad one.
    Say calculated Measure Name "Weekly" with Syntax
    CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[Weekly]
     AS IIF(isempty([Measures].[Actual Quantity MTD]) or [Measures].[Actual Quantity MTD]=0 or isempty([Measures].[Original Plan Quantity  MTD])   , null ,
    IIF([Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD] =0 or isempty([Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD]),null,   
    IIF( 
     ([Measures].[Actual Quantity MTD]-[Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD]) > 0 , 1 ,[Measures].[Actual Quantity MTD]/ [Measures].[Original Plan Quantity MTD] ))) 
    The Result is good
    here the picture
    http://hpics.li/9fd22f2
    https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByY5H-XcydgiWGp0RzdWYWp0M2c&authuser=0
    and for Monthly Calculation  it was AVG of Weekly base on Time, Plant, and PSL Dimension 
    My calculated Monthly Measure Name "Monthly" with Syntax
    CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[Monthly]
     AS AVG ( 
    DESCENDANTS([PSL].[PSL Description])*
    DESCENDANTS([Plant].[Plant])*
    DESCENDANTS([Finish Date].[Calendar],[Finish Date].[Calendar].[Month Year]) 
    , AVG(([Finish Date].[Calendar].CURRENTMEMBER.CHILDREN), [Measures].[Weekly]))
    The Result is Bad on Grand total 
    here the Picture link 
    http://hpics.li/5233b50
    https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByY5H-XcydgicEhtT1FpekRsbW8&authuser=0
    Please help me why for the Result doesn't same. What do i Miss
    Thank You 
    Yan

    Hi Yan,
    According to your description, you create a calculated measure in your cube, the problem is that grand Total for Monthly is incorrect, right?
    In your scenario, the issue can be caused by that you used "*" and "/" in your calculated measure. In SSAS, one of the most common issues faced in mdx is grand total or sub total not coming properly when some arithmetic operations like
    measure1 [* or + or - or /] measure2 is used, please refer to the link below to see the details.
    http://vnu10.blogspot.jp/2011/01/mdx-grand-total-sub-total.html
    Regards,

  • Grand Total in Pivot Table

    Hi, I have a pivot table with several measures and grand totals. The problem is that there is one measure where the totals show up incorrectly. By incorrectly I mean that this shouldn't be sum of rows, but a different calculation and I haven't found a way to define separate calculation for this total.
    Is there a way to hide totals for this one measure? Or is it still somehow possible to use some different value/calculation in there?

    In the Pivot Table I'm currently using sum, because I'm combining different queries with union. In the actual query these values are calculated by row using Count Distinct. Now in the total it just sums up individual Count Distinct values but the correct value should be Count Distinct for total data set.

  • Adding a grand total to the columns

    Hi
    I need to add a total to one of the columns in my report. I have set Aggregation rule as "Sum" but it is not displaying Grand Total.
    Am I missing any thing or setting the rule incorrectly?
    Please advise.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Jas

    Hi Arvindh
    Thanks for your response. I am not using a pivot table I just tried to add total to the table which is created by just selecting columns required in the Define Criteria section.
    We can add a total w/o creating the pivot table also. By the way, I have found the solution. The key lies in the second step. If u want me to explain in detail. Just let me know.
    -Jas

  • Pivot table - Grand total Error

    hi,
    I am getting incorrect totals in my Pivot table.
    i.e The Grand Total is not giving the exact sum.
    pls direct me..
    My scenario: I need to calculate the total expenses per region and quarterwise.

    i havent used any aggregation rule.
    In the Answers, i have designed the Pivot table in the below format
    [i simply drag-dropped the Columns]
    I should give the grand total regionwise and also quarterwise.but the grand totals arent displaying the proper results.
    pls advise.
    Ex:
    region          Q1     Q2     Q3     Region- Grand total
    AAA          20000     50000     120000     xxxxxxx
    BBB          22240     13456     111500     xxxxxxxxx
    Qtr-Grand Total     zzz     zzzz     zzzz     nnnnnnnnn

  • Grand Total % Variance

    Hi,
    I have a Report for GL Reconciliation and it shows Source System Balances and GL Balances along with the Variance in these two and % Variance.
    Sample data is as follows:
    Year     Month     SYS     Source System Bal GL Balances     Variance     % Variance
    2010     MAY     A     66,100,676,002     60,994,246,811     -5106429191     -8.37%
    2010     MAY     B     29,081,192,665     29,066,650,415     -14542249.78     -0.05%
    2010     MAY     C     218,856,115     212,416,688     -6439426.71     -3.03%
    2010     MAY     D     14,601,939               -100.00%
    2010     MAY     E     808,716,681     822,453,990     13737309.05     1.67%
    2010     MAY     F     5,874,200,259     6,856,456,401     982256141.3     14.33%
    2010     MAY     G     2,181,160,124     2,164,379,222     -16780901.26     -0.78%
    2010     MAY     H     10,505,609,797     23,529,905,894     13024296097     55.35%
    2010     MAY     I     1,566,030,457     1,565,502,039     -528418.48     -0.03%
    2010     MAY     J     1,479,284,089          100.00%
    2010     MAY     K     10,939,680,559     7,481,930,011     -3457750548     -46.21%
    2010     MAY     L     8,774,737,817     8,831,160,339     56422521.84     0.64%
    2010     MAY     M     1,117,717,954     548,331,847     -569386106.3     -103.84%
    2010     MAY     N     73,670,961     55,680,430     -17990531.39     -32.31%
    2010     MAY     O     4,583,263,229     4,562,122,752     -21140477.19     -0.46%
    2010     MAY     P     204,382,965     206,288,734     1905768.97     0.92%
    2010     MAY NULL          332,763,879          100.00%
         MAYTotal          142,044,497,524     148,709,573,543     6665076018     4.48%
    Now This is how the Report will work as Normal...
    What the user wants is Instead of Variance he wants to see the Absolute variance. So If I run absolute function on This Column, I will get following results:
    ABS(Variance)
    5,106,429,191
    14,542,250
    6,439,427
    13,737,309
    982,256,141
    16,780,901
    13,024,296,097
    528,418
    3,457,750,548
    56,422,522
    569,386,106
    17,990,531
    21,140,477
    1,905,769
    6665076018 --- -This Total is Incorrect as it is showing only the Absolute value to the Total, where as it should be More than this and to achieve this, I changed the Aggreegation Rule to SUM
    to Get the correct sum of the figures mentioned ablove which will show following output:
    ABS(Variance)
    5,106,429,191
    14,542,250
    6,439,427
    13,737,309
    982,256,141
    16,780,901
    13,024,296,097
    528,418
    3,457,750,548
    56,422,522
    569,386,106
    17,990,531
    21,140,477
    1,905,769
    23,289,605,688
    Now Till this point everything is correct and can be achieved. The problem is with the % Variance:
    Bydefault % Variance ( Calculated using Variance/GL Balances )*100 Is as follows:
    % Variance
    -8.37%
    -0.05%
    -3.03%
    -100.00%
    1.67%
    14.33%
    -0.78%
    55.35%
    -0.03%
    100.00%
    -46.21%
    0.64%
    -103.84%
    -32.31%
    -0.46%
    0.92%
    100.00%
    4.48%
    But the Users wants that The % variance be calculated on Variance Column and GL Balances Column ( Variance/ GL Balances)*100
    But the Grand Total values at the bottom should be based on ( Grand Total of ABS(Variance)/ Grand Total of GL Balances ) *100
    to get the Desired results as :
    % Variance
    -8.37%
    -0.05%
    -3.03%
    -100.00%
    1.67%
    14.33%
    -0.78%
    55.35%
    -0.03%
    100.00%
    -46.21%
    0.64%
    -103.84%
    -32.31%
    -0.46%
    0.92%
    100.00%
    15.66%
    (23,289,605,688/1,48,709,573,543)*100
    If someone can help me with this...
    Edited by: help-required on Oct 1, 2010 1:14 AM

    OK, there are a couple of things that have to be pointed out before getting to the actual problem. First of all, the column you named "Variance" is not a variance, but a "difference" and should be labeled as such. Second, what is the variance you are trying to calculate?
    If the variance is from the "Source System Bal," then the calculation is ("GL Balances" - "Source System Bal")/"Source System Bal"
    If the variance is from the "GL Balances," then the calculation is ("Source System Bal" - GL Balances")/"GL Balances"
    You have ("GL Balances" - "Source System Bal")/"GL Balances" so do you know what you are measuring? Make sure you get this part right first. Now on to the issue itself.
    This is the point of confusion with some I think: you want the individual rows of the "% Variance" column to display the +actual+ variance, positive or negative, but in just the total at the bottom, you want the "% Variance" to reflect the "absolute values of the differences, summed, and then divided by the GL Balances."
    You can't have two different calculations on the same column like that, one for the rows and a completely different one for the total.
    Here's a workaround. Uncheck the "totals" for the pivot table completely and just show the rows. (Make sure you change the name of the "Variance" column to "Difference" or something similar.)
    Now create another pivot table view, but take out all the attributes so the measures sum up. Add an additional column called "ABS % Variance" and make this calculated column (do this in Criteria in the fx of a "dummy column"):
    (ABS("GL Balances" - "Source System Balances")/"Source System Bal")*100.00
    Don't forget to change the data format to "percentage."
    Now place this pivot table view directly below the one with the individual rows. You should now have what you are looking for.
    Edited by: David_T on Sep 30, 2010 10:58 AM

  • OBIEE11g Grand total not summing up correctly

    hi all,
    I have to display the grand total from the foll calculation : (total po numbers - total Recd on time PO numbers) / total PO numbers.
    To get the total PO numbers - in the Edit formula - COUNT(PO numbers) and aggregation rule is set to SUM - this gives total correctly. eg : count of Total PO numbers - 15
    To get the total Recd on time PO numbers-- In the edit formula fields - COUNT(Recd on time PO numbers) and aggregation rule is set to SUM . This also shows hte total correctly. Eg : Count of total Recd on time PO numbers 12
    Now I do the division (Recd on time PO numbers/ total PO numbers ) Again in the Edit formula field SUM( COUNT(PO numbers))/ SUM(COUNT(Recd on time PO numbers)) - This gives incorrect results. output is 12.
    12/15 should be .8 but it shows 12.
    I am not sure why its not doing the calculation correctly.
    Is there any way I can achieve this ?
    Thanks
    OBI_user

    * 1.00 => http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/int

  • OBIEE 10g - Unable to see data in the report view with grand total applied

    Hi,
    We're facing with a strange issue.
    We're working on a report view.
    We're able to see data when Grand total is not applied on the report. The moment Grand Total is applied, it's showing either an empty table with NULL values or "No Results" page.
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance.
    -Rama

    Hi Dpk,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I included it in the instanceconfig.xml, but the issue still exists.
    Couple of Observations
    #1 - We noticed this issue when we drill down to the level which has really sparse data.
    It works fine when we look at the enterprise wide report.
    #2 - Works fine with few dimensional attributes and facts on the report
    When we add a fact that doesn't have any value at that level, the issue starts to appear.
    Thanks in advance.
    -Rama

  • % is not getting correctly for the Grand Total Row in OBI10g

    Hi,We have a report in table view with the following structure.
    Name     Target     Act     %Ach
    ABC     100     50     50
    XYZ     200     10     5
    Total     300     60     27.5
    The value for the %Ach Total row should be 20% but in the report it is showing as 27.5.
    any one observed this ,how to correct this??
    Thanks

    Hi,
    To get grand total correctly..configure instanceconfig.xml and put..
    <ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled> between <serverinstace>..
    refer..
    http://obiee101.blogspot.com/2009/09/obiee-grand-totals-with-calculated.html
    Hope it solves ur problem

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to Get a list of pending deferred tasks

    Hi all there is a bunch of unfinished threads here asking how to get a list/report of deferred tasks that are associated with user objects and scheduled for future execution. I need this list and I can't find out how to get it anyway. I don't care if

  • How to restrict group of workstations

    Zenworks 3.2 sp2 & WinXP Novell Client 4.9sp2 User policy for Staff/Faculty accounts gives them DLU accounts wiht the Admininstrator's rights - the main reason is the fact that they use PCs mainly in the offices. Volatile User Cache is set to 366 day

  • Data Source for reused bounded task flow

    Hi, I am using JDeveloper 11.1.2.4.0. I have a project from which I exported a bounded task flow to be used in other projects. When I include that bounded task flow in a separate project, its data source does not appear in the Databindings.cpx of the

  • How do i reorganise my full disk

    I have a 250GB disc on my iMac but I also have a Terra Byte and a 500GB external drive. My files are not well organised and my iMac HD is nearly full. I would like to store my iPhoto library externally but it will not allow me to drag and drop it. Ca

  • New to JSF

    i am new to JSF. can any body tell the flow structure in typical JSF application and tell me the differences between JSF and struts?