GRC AC 10 (BRM) Risk Analysis Report type is editable

Hi,
In  GRC10 – BRM  Risk analysis at “Action Level”, “Permission Level”, “Critical Action”, “Critical Permission” and “Critical Role/Profile” is editable.
When i start to create a role in the Risk Analysis step, Permission Level is always selected .Selection is fine as this is configured this way (Parameter in SPRO 1023 -Default Report Type for Risk Analysis).  But exist the option to deselect "Permission Level". 
As you can Permission level is always selected and not editable?
Regards

Hi,
I guess Cristian mentions attached BRM screen. I have same issue; how to change default values of report type in BRM like parameter 1023 changes in access request.
Also, if we change default value of check box, Cristian can set non-editable fields through SE80.

Similar Messages

  • Risk analysis Report Error in GRC AC 10.0

    Dear GRC,
    I had problem with Risk analysis Report in GRC Access Request form
    When i run the Risk analysis report on Action Level , Permission Level , Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level then report showing as "No Violations" but if i run the Risk analysis report only on Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level then report showing too many Violations.
    I maintained Action Level , Permission Level , Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level as default risk analysis type in SPRO Configuration Parameters settings.
    i am not understanding why system behaves like this. Could you please help me on this.
    System Details : GRC AC 10.0 , SP-12
    Thanks a lot for swift response.
    Best Regards,
    RK

    Hi GRC Team,
    Please help me on this. I am waiting for your replay.
    Regards,
    KR

  • GRC_10 Risk Analysis Report

    Hi,
    i should extend the risk analysis report with more details from diffrent tables, they hold special role details.
    I havent found an idea how to do this.
    Could i extend the standard report for risk analysis with more columns?
    Is there something like user.exits or enhancement-points?
    thank you very much indeed
    best regards
    Alex

    Hi Alex,
    did you have a chance to look at standard SAP Help information about different types of reports and information available?
    If not yet -please take a look at:
    Risk Analysis Reports - SAP GRC Access Control - SAP Library
    What exactly information you would like to add to reports?
    Standard reports can by customized by adding some additional fields which are hidden in standard view.
    There is also an option to add custom fields and data,
    Lets us know,
    Filip

  • Role Based Risk Analysis Report

    Hello All,
    When I executed the Risk Analysis report for a role with SOD Risk Level = ALL and Report type = SOD at Authorization Object level, the results come back as "NO CONFLICT FOUND".  this is the correct response.
    However, I executed the Risk Analysis report for the same role with SOD Risk Level = HIGH and Report type = SOD at Authorization Object level, the results come back SOD conflicts based on the conflicting transactions.  Is there a bug with analyzing roles using this option?
    Also, when I click on the Detail Report button, I received object data that does not appear correct.
    Please Help.  Thanks.
    Edited by: Michael Johnson on Apr 8, 2009 8:54 PM

    Hi Babiji,
    Are you using any specific tools for SOD's? If you are using GRC tool, then it can be done using compliance calibrator Role level Risk analysis.In addition to what Sneha has said,
    To find out the conflicting roles in CC version 5.2 the path is INFORMER->Risk Analysis->Role level.In Virsa 4.0 you have the option of carrying out risk anaysis at role level by executing the t-code /N/VIRSA/ZVRAT.
    In section Analysis type, choose Roles and enter the list of roles.
    In section SOD Risk level, choose the appropriate risk.
    Then choose the appropriate report type and report format before executing it.
    This will display all the roles with the levels of risk associated with it and then you can mitigate these as per your organizational policies & procedures.
    Thanks,
    Saby..

  • Ad hoc Risk Analysis report is returning incorrect Risk Level for some Risks

    We are running GRC AC 10.0 with SP 16.  After application of Support Pack 16, some of our ad hoc risk analysis reports are returning incorrect risk levels.  For example:  Risk F024 Open closed periods and inappropriately post currency or tax entries is set as High.  When the Ad hoc report is run, the risk F024 will show on a user with a level of Medium.  We have generated our ruleset and have followed the normal procedures used to implement the support pack.  Any ideas what is causing this issue?  I have exhausted my knowledge and search attempts.
    Any help is appreciated.
    Sara B.

    Hi Kevin
    Many thanks for your post, we did run a full BRA but no luck unfortunately. Some Risks still reporting as Medium when they should be Critical or High. Oddly it is reporting correctly against some risks just not for all!
    Cheers
    Hussain

  • Issue with risk analysis report in GRC10.0

    Hi All,
    We are running the user risk analysis report from NWBC: Reports and Analytics -> Access Risk Analysis Reports -> User Risk Violation report.
    This report is not fetching all the data even though user has all the required authorizations.
    We are getting the data when we execute the dashboard reports.
    Any one has idea?
    Cheers
    Hari

    Alessandro,
    Thanks for the reply. I am aware of this.
    Problem is when dash board report is showing the risk for the user but risk anaylsis report in Reports and Analytics is not showing the risks to that user.
    As per our investigation, the risk data that is displaying in the risk anaylsis report in Reports and Analytics is incomplete. We didn't find any errors in SLG1. Also there is no issues from authorizations side.
    Regards
    Hari

  • GRC 10.0 Adhoc Risk Analysis

    Hi Guys,
    Is there any risk or chances of loosing data if the below listed table is cleaned up?
    GRACSODREPDATA
    GRACSODREPINDEX
    GRACSODREPSTATUS
    I just wanted to know if these tables are cleaned up and if we want any historical data may it be tcode analysis report or risk analysis report, can we get the historical data?
    Thanks & Regards
    Ratan

    Dear Ratan,
    you should study the following document: http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1580877
    Regards,
    Alessandro

  • Risk analysis reports in IDM 6.0

    Hi
    I was trying to run risk analysis report to detect deleted users in Red hat linux. I was not sure what report to run. I tried various things like user report, resource accoutn report etc. However these reports gave the the list of users deleted in IDM but not the resource. Can i somehow create a customized report to do this?
    Any help regarding this matter is appreciated
    Thanks
    Man

    Hi,
    Please check following path in easy access
    1) Accounting ->Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling ->Product Cost Planning ->Information System
    2) Accounting ->Financial Accounting ->Fixed Assets ->Information System
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Risk Analysis Reports Format

    Hello Experts,
    What is main difference between Risk Analysis Report Formats ....
    Summary
    Detail
    Management Summary
    Executive Summary
    Please explain in depth and which scenarios we are using these reports. Please give a one business example.
    Regards,
    Babu

    Dear Babu,
    trying to help you.
    Summary: gives you an overview of conflicts on action level. Can be used to discuss with business what is causing the risk.
    Detail: gives you an overview of conflicts on authorization level. Can be used to analyze how a conflict can be removed.
    Management summary: gives you an overview of risks on user level. Can be used to report how many risks are currently in the system on user level. E.g. userA has 3 risks, userB has 2 risks, etc.
    Executive Summary: gives you an overview of risks on risk level. Can be used to have a general overview of applicable risks in the system. E.g. riskA has no conflicts, riskB has 7 conflicts, etc.
    Best if you just analyze and you will see the differences. If you have a particular question do not hesitate to contact us.
    Regards,
    Alessandro

  • GRC AC 10.0  Risk Analysis -Risk Terminator Vs BRM-Role Management

    Hi All,
    After having seen the configuration for Risk Analysis- Risk Terminator and Role Management , I observed that there is very little difference  for eg parameters 1085 and 3011 ,3014 .  If we configure all three parameters to TRUE which one would take effect ?Can anyone let us know under what circumstances we must configure RT and Role Management . BRM to has a whole lot of new features which supercede RT. 
    Best Regards,
    Vishal

    Hi Vishal,
    The parameters will be invoked in different scenarios. 1085 is specific to when roles are generated in the SAP Backend system using risk terminator and therefore this will have no impact if you are using BRM to generate the roles.
    3011 & 3014 are specific to BRM and govern different behaviours. 3011 will facilitate the risk analysis prior to triggering the generation steps in the methodology and 3014 will allow the roles to be generated despite any permission risks that are returned.
    They are not exclusive and actually work together. For instance, you may want to have a block on generation of roles when there are open conflicts identified and therefore you should have 3011 set to YES and 3014 set to NO. If both are set to YES, then you could propagate conflicts in the roles.
    You can use Risk Terminator if you wish to continue to develop roles within the SAP system itself rather than to rely on the GRC BRM system wholly.
    There are still wide discussions and differing opinions about which represents the best approach for this and so it depends on your organisation as to which process you follow.
    The parameter descriptions in question are:  
    1085 - Stop Role Generation if violations exist
    3011 - Conduct Risk Analysis before Role Generation
    3014 - Allow role generation with Permission Level violations
    Regards, Simon

  • GRC Risk analysis reports are not checking all possible risk conflicts set up in the rule set that lead to risks.

    Dear All,
    After running the risk analysis it shows only the first conflict for a risk in the rule set (Rule ID 0001). We have already Generated SOD ruleset. Also during migration from 5.3 to AC10.1 all the rulesets were imported properly.
    What could be reason??
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards,
    Abhisshek

    Abhisshek,
    there is already a thread with the same question:  Dear all I only get result for one rule id and not with others what should be an issue?
    Regards,
    Alessandro

  • GRC AC 10.1 - Risk Analysis: No rules were selected

    Hi All,
    I'm currently configuring the ARA module in GRC AC 10.1, and an facing this issue. When I run my User Analysis, its throwing an error message "No rules were selected'.
    As per your suggestions from discussions, i double checked all the below activities
    Activate the BC sets
    Run Sync Jobs
    Run Batch Risk Analysis
    After all this I found that the functions are not mapped to the logical groups(Back-end Systems) I have defined. Can you please let me know how to make sure you have correct back end system(logical Group) updated for the functions in the setup? Doesn't the configurations Connector/Connector Groups etc already mapped the functions to the back-end system? It would be a hell of work to do all the system mapping on function level manually.

    Hi Narsimha
    You need to map your connectors to the logical systems that are used in the function definitions
    Look at your integration framework Setup in the IMG.
    Governance, Risk and Compliance > Common Component Settings > Integration Framework > Maintain Connectors and Connection Types
    Also, for 10.1 there was an issue with logical systems. It may be that your configuration is correct: Re: GRC 10.0 SP14 - Poblems when generating rules for logical systems
    Regards
    Colleen

  • Can you download RAR Risk Analysis reports to something other than Excel?

    When you run a RAR Risk Analysis and go to export the resulting reports, RAR automatically exports this into an Excel spreadsheet.
    Is it possible to export the reports into some other kind of format/tool?  (SQL would be ideal.)
    We are on GRC 5.3 SP13.
    Thanks.

    Our CMG group runs a company-wide risk analysis 2-3 times a year to use in their SOD Review process.  We are looking into loading this report into QuickView to give them more capabilities with using the report.  QV will work with Excel, but you have to load every spreadsheet and every page separately. 
    We are looking to see if we could download it into some other format that would contain all of the report in just one file.  Would make the QV load easier.  Something like SQL would probably be ideal.
    Thanks.

  • AC 5.3 RAR - combined risk analysis reports for regular auth. and SPM auth.

    Dear All,
    we have users that have regular day-today authorization and also FF authorization.
    Does the Batch Risk Analysis takes into account both authorizations when doing the risk analysis for those users ? will we see it in the reports ?
    Thanks
    Yudit

    ok, so basically the answer is no, in the RAR components we do not have risk analysis for the combinations of the roles assigned to the user and to his FF ID.
    in that case, at what stage does the system checks for those combined risks ?
    is it checked when we manage the risk analysis phase in the CUP request that is asking to assign the FF ID to the user ?
    thanks
    Yudit

  • ARA: "[P/G]" symbol in Risk Analysis Report???

    Hi,
    I have noticed a peculiar symbol in Access Risk analysis while performing permission level analysis. The symbol is "[P/G]<TCODE>".
    I have not this before. Any idea why this is coming and how I can resolve this?
    Please see the screenshot for the same.
    Recently, our target system is upgraded. I am sure if this is coming because of that. Earlier, it was working fine.
    Also, system is showing unknown risks violations for roles and all of them are preceded by "[P/G]" symbol.
    Please advise.
    Regards,
    Faisal

    Alessandro,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Yes, these actions are assigned to functions.
    Secondly, I re-generated the rules and the result is same. Also, I used
    our quality system (upgrade is not done yet) and analyzed the same role and it gave expected results!
    I am using same GRC system but different target systems. ERP Development system is causing problem where as ERP Quality system is not.
    Based upon my analysis, I see some problem with our ERP development system which is not showing appropriate results. But not sure what to do.
    Any help please?
    Regards,
    Faisal

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can't POST to RESTful WebServiceProvider using HTTP API?

    Apologies - this should have been posted in the Web Services forum. I have moved this thread over there. Edited by: alecbritton on Oct 10, 2007 4:40 PM

  • Codec

    What the correct codec for Final Cut Pro?

  • Clone stamp bug?

    Elements 12. Clone stamp tool has suddenly gone haywire. Can't change size of stamp, and once selected, the function locks onto the photo and moves it all around on the screen. What's up, Adobe? Have used Elements for years, and all was working well

  • InDesign CS6 interactive fla and swf files to .mov files

    I have created an interactive file with photos in InDesign CS6 and would like to be able to drop it into iMovie to use as part of a slideshow. How do I convert the swf or fla file to an iMovie compatible file? Any direction would be appreciated.

  • Display rows into multiple columns

    I have a table in the following format: id value a1 0 a2 0 a3 0 a4 0 b1 0 b2 0 b3 0 b4 0 how do I go about displaying it into four columns in the following format: id1 value1 id2 value2 a1 0 b1 0 a2 0 b2 0 a3 0 b3 0 a4 0 b4 0