GRUB 10_linux patch - what's the best way to share?

Question

New to Arch but not Linux. So, trying this adventure called Arch and one of the things that annoyed me right away is how GRUB discovers the kernels when you have both 'linux' and 'linux-lts' installed (primary and backup per the wiki) without version numbers. I created a simple patch so that natural alpha sorting order is used and 'linux' becomes the default kernel (both with/without submenu enabled). This seems to me what the average user is probably looking for by default, not the 'linux-lts' kernel (the problem is in how the internal version comparison routines work in /usr/share/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib - they don't expect a list of kernels with *no* versions in the names).
Should I:
Post on the GRUB Discussion page
Post on the main GRUB wiki page as a new item
Post to the GNU GRUB bugtracker and hope
Not sure what's considered the right way to go about it in this community, guidance? Thx!
--- 10_linux.orig 2014-05-14 01:22:27.000000000 -0500
+++ 10_linux 2014-06-21 13:20:37.816869963 -0500
@@ -177,7 +177,16 @@
is_top_level=true
while [ "x$list" != "x" ] ; do
- linux=`version_find_latest $list`
+ # version_find_latest returns 'linux-lts' before 'linux' on the average
+ # Arch install of these two kernels, we'll first check if there are any
+ # numerics in the kernels, and if not just pop them off the stack in
+ # natural alpha sorting order.
+ if [ $(echo $list | grep -q '[0-9]') ]; then
+ linux=`version_find_latest $list`
+ else
+ artmp=($list)
+ linux=${artmp[0]}
+ fi
gettext_printf "Found linux image: %s\n" "$linux" >&2
basename=`basename $linux`
dirname=`dirname $linux`

Answer 1

Great, thanks - done and done.
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?42597
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ta … t_versions
My patch is pretty basic, there's probably a better way of going about this the GRUB coders will figure out.