Handling inbound messages in B2B

Dear All
I have problem configurating B2B to receive any inbound message from the IP_IN_QUEUE, local directory or ftp. Basically, the remote partner transport just doesn't go and pick up the incoming messages. All outbound messages work fine. I am using the HL7 protocol.
I have tried to set oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.DocumentRouting=true as recommended in the manual but it doesn't help.
Just wondering any other setting I need to change before the engine is able to pick up inbound messages.
Thanks in advance,
Alan

Dear all,
I can finally recieve an inbound HL7 with MLLP. One strange thing I find is that the Win32 version does not have the option for entering the "MLLP ID". However, I Still do not have much luck with inbound file.
I now have other questions. We want to setup a B2B server to receive all HL7 messages. As the B2B server would process all incoming messages and put it in the IP_IN_QUEUE, how would the BPEL processes know which message they should pickup from the queue? I read something about the document routing ID but it seems that HL7 doesn't have this feature.
Another question, is it possible to adjust the frequency of the B2B server to poll the outbound queue for jobs? We have applications that require very fast response and the current setting just do not serve our needs.
Finally, is it that if we want an inbound queue services in B2B, how long does it take for the feature to be included in the service?
Thank you very much for you help,
Alan

Similar Messages

BPEL Process unable to read Inbound messages from B2B Inbound IP_IN_QUEUE

Hi Greetings.
I am working on setting up trading partners at a customer place using BPEL and B2B. BPEL is 10.1.3 and B2B is 10.1.2. The previous BPEL developers developed some processes and deployed them to Development environment. B2B is also set up by them. Lets say the customer name is Pet Safe who is the host trading partner and the remote trading partner is Pet Smart. PetSmart sends Purchase Orders (850s) using EDI over Internet via AS2 connection. My B2B server has received the test PO and sent back the Functional Acknowledgement (997) to the Remote Trading partner. I can see the messages in TIP_BUSINESSMESSAGE_RT in B2B schema of the database which Oracle 10g.
There is a BPEL process called RSCProcess850. It has been developed by using JDeveloper 10g. This process has a AQ adapter configured in the source code of BPEL. It uses a managed connection factory to connect to the Adapter framework and makes a connection to the database, which in turn talks to the EIS to dequeue the messages in B2B inbound queues. This process dequeus the messages and transforms the EDI and puts the PO details into Oracle e-business Suite tables. There is another process called SendInvoice which is configured to a Data Base adapter which polls a table in the Data BAse and sends the invoice to the B2B schema by enqueing the data to OutBound queues of B2B schema. I tried creating a connection factory using Enterprize manage console for both AQ Adapter and DB Adapter but when restarted the server it is unable to load all the BPEL process because the source code of BPEL is mismathching the password. So I have deleted the connection factories that are created suing em console. These connection factories insert an entry in oc4j-ra.xml files for both AQ Adapter and DB adapter. Once I have deleted them and restarted the server all the processes are loading but the problem is the BPEL process is neither dequeueing or enqueueing the messages. There are no errors thrown in the BPEL Domain logs also. The test PO order details are not there in the staging tables of the e-business tables, which means that the BPEL process are not able to DeQ or EnQ using the adapters. How do I know whether the adapter is fetchingthe data from staging tables or not? I am nearing my deadline but unable to proceed I am stuck here. Any sort of help or approach is highly appreciated.
my e-mail Id is [email protected]
Thanks in advance
Sudhakar

Hi,
To test whether the messgae is ENQ or DEQ u can use the sql given in thte B2B user guide.
Ritesh

Handling inbound messages

Hi,
We would like to handle incoming messages. The problem appears when we send an e-mail to SAP system. I can see some of SMTP transaction traces in log file, but some of them are not. Also, I cannot see any e-mail notification in SOIN transaction. I applied all the steps respectfully, indicated in OSS note# 455140, but couldn't help us. Please find the handler table, below;
E-posta * * ZCL_MAIL_INBOUND_SYS_CHECK 1
E-posta * ICS CL_APPOINTMENT_REPLY 3
Can anyone give a suggestion about it? Why I cannot see incoming e-mails on SOIN?
Thank you
Orkun Gedik

I found the solution. Just need a patch.
Best regards,
Orkun Gedik

Error receiving AS2 message from partner: B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error

B2B/SOA 11.1.1.6.0
We are setting a new trading partner and when we started document transmissions we are getting errors on the inbound messages: B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error.
The attachment shows the relevant lines from the soa log and diagnostic log files. Here is the error detail that shows:
[URI: /b2b/httpreceiver] Error -: B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error[[
Error -: B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessageImpl(Engine.java:3143)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1650)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.transport.InterfaceListener.onMessageLocal(InterfaceListener.java:403)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.transport.InterfaceListener.onMessage(InterfaceListener.java:214)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.transport.basic.TransportServlet.doPost(TransportServlet.java:754)
        at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)
        at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:301)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
        at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter$1.run(JpsAbsFilter.java:119)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at oracle.security.jps.util.JpsSubject.doAsPrivileged(JpsSubject.java:315)
        at oracle.security.jps.ee.util.JpsPlatformUtil.runJaasMode(JpsPlatformUtil.java:442)
        at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.runJaasMode(JpsAbsFilter.java:103)
        at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.doFilter(JpsAbsFilter.java:171)
        at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsFilter.doFilter(JpsFilter.java:71)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
        at oracle.dms.servlet.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:139)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3730)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3696)
        at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
        at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2273)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2179)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1490)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221)
From the b2b_wire_message we get these Protocol_Transport_BINDINGS:
ChannelName=TransportServlet
Reverse-Via=LIN-ISA1
AS2-To=accobra.....
Date=Fri, 26 Sep 2014 05:46:17 +0000
AS2-Version=1.2
AS2-From=K.......
Disposition-Notification-Options=signed-receipt-protocol=optional, pkcs7-signature; signed-receipt-micalg=optional, sha1
Disposition-Notification-To=http://<ip&port>/as2in
Message-ID=<[email protected]>
MSG_RECEIVED_TIME=Fri Sep 26 00:46:17 CDT 2014
ECID-Context=1.0050z5j^buc6yGn6wnZf6G0002f60007bt;kXjE1ZDLIPGIj2QCYV8QoKSSmLRO_PQT_IS
Content-Type=application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type=enveloped-data; name=smime.p7m
Proxy-Client-IP=172.17.25.101
MIME-Version=1.0
User-Agent=e-integration AS2 Server V 6.1.8
X-Forwarded-For=172.17.25.101
Content-Length=3602
Host=nalinsoa05.abd.ad.acco.com
x-weblogic-cluster-hash=QoZzGUzdcjBD5fGIE8Uos5abiHI
EDIINT-Features=multiple-attachments, CEM
Connection=Keep-Alive
X-WebLogic-KeepAliveSecs=30
X-WebLogic-Request-ClusterInfo=true
The message creates a wire message, business message, and an application message.
What doesn't happen is no MDN gets sent back to the partner. It should be a synchronous MDN.
We have double checked the certificates on both ends and they are OK.
The document and Agreement get recognized OK:
Refer To Message
Refer To Message
Sender Type
AS2 Identifier
Sender Value
K. . .
Receiver Type
AS2 Identifier
Receiver Value
accobr. . .
Sender
K. . . l
Receiver
ACCO . . .
Agreement Id
K. . .l_EDI_X12_4010_856_856Def_Inbound
Agreement
K. . .l_EDI_X12_4010_856_856Def_Inbound
Document Type
856
Document Protocol
EDI_X12
Document Version
4010
Message Type
REQ
Direction
INBOUND
State
MSG_ERROR
Acknowledgement Mode
SYNC
Response Mode
ASYNC
Send Time Stamp
09/26/2014 12:46:17 AM
Receive Time Stamp
09/26/2014 12:46:17 AM
The error is vague enough to provide little or no help in locating the root cause of the issue.
Any assistance in providing information on how to get this working would be greatly appreciated.
We do have dozens of other AS2 partners working in this instance just foe reference. We are just having issues with this new partner setup.
Thank you.
Regards,
Ken

Ken,
I am observing the Ack Mode is set as "SYNC" . This is selected by default. This option is available in the channel configuration section
If the usecase is not SYNC, please change as ASYNC and test. It should work.

SOAP version for B2B HTTP inbound message in SOA Suite 11.1.1.7

Is there a way to find out the SOAP version supported by B2B HTTP inbound message in SOA Suite 11.1.1.7? Has there been a upgrade of SOAP version to SOAP 1.2?
The reason behind this assumption is because we are facing following error when an external service posts an XML message enclosed in SOAP envelope (SOAP 1.1) to B2B Sync Receiver Servlet:
Mime Header Content-Type: text/xml requires SOAP envelope namespace
Since SOAP headers are already added in the message we are not expecing to face such issue. As per my understanding this issue maybe seen when there is a SOAP version mismatch.
Moreover, this issue is not seen when this external service posts the same SOAP message to B2B Sync Receiver of SOA suite 11.1.1.6.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,

I resolved the issue by myself, The connection factory which I was referring was duplicated. Hence messages were not dequeueing.
I would be able to found the issues by creating a similar test case scenario.
Cheers,
B

B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error

We are trying to implement B2B with Customer EDI X12 850 Inbound with SOA
Application server Version 11.1.1.4.0 (weblogic)
Hitting the following error in the logs
MDS-00013: no metadata found for metadata object "/soa/b2b/EDI_X12/4010/850/New/8504010Viterra.ecs"
Was successful in overcoming all the usual obstacles of finding the TP, Document Type, protocol etc...However hitting the above error. 8504010Viterra.ecs is a custom spec builder document we created and "8504010Viterra.ecs" was browsed from the windows PC into the Document Type B2B set up. I am willing to use a seeded ecs file but do not know how to find one for X12 850 4010 version....?
Went through one SR that asks you upload a group ECS file but that did not help in our case....Following was the SR
"B2B-50037 B2B INBOUND MESSAGE PROCESSING" Error with EDIX12 And DEF 830 VER 200\0 [ID 1357136.1]
Please help
Now at the agreement level, if we set the translate to No and Validate to No then B2B completes normally but we do want B2B to translate the file so that we can get it in XML form for us to transform and process it in BPEL
Any help or hint is really appreciated!

Anuj
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! I cannot thank you enough for this
I was playing around so much with the document type, the protocol version etc. that i must have inadvertently messed up the repository. I took the export of the data as you suggested, purged the design repository and reimported the zip. I also had to restart the server since the ftp was not kicking in...& wholla! the message got translated into XML and went into the queue
Thanks again
Gopal Iyer
Edited by: ghiyer on Nov 10, 2011 10:07 AM

B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error java.lang.NullPointerException

Can anyone help me with this problem.
I'm new here.
Oracle SOA Server version 11.1.1.6.0
Got this error message after I put Ignore Correlation true.
diagnostic.log:
[2013-08-12T14:05:26.668+02:00] [MS_KETEN_SOA_01] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: DaemonWorkThread: '17' of WorkManager: 'wm/SOAWorkManager'] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000K1mQe8WAdL9_rdH7iY1I2CVn0000Lc,0] [APP: soa-infra] Engine: processIncomingMessageImpl: Message id = 0A253556140726AA60A000003E11ADD0-1 FromParty = JD0021_OTA Doctype = ScanDocumenten version = 1.0
[2013-08-12T14:05:26.712+02:00] [MS_KETEN_SOA_01] [ERROR] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: DaemonWorkThread: '17' of WorkManager: 'wm/SOAWorkManager'] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000K1mQe8WAdL9_rdH7iY1I2CVn0000Lc,0] [APP: soa-infra]     [[
        at oracle.tip.b2b.msgproc.Acknowledgment.createAckMsg(Acknowledgment.java:659)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.msgproc.Acknowledgment.asyncOutgoingAck(Acknowledgment.java:290)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.msgproc.Request.handleAck(Request.java:652)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessageImpl(Engine.java:3019)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1650)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4042)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3718)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3205)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:677)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:211)
        at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
        at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
        at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
[2013-08-12T14:05:26.720+02:00] [MS_KETEN_SOA_01] [ERROR] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: DaemonWorkThread: '17' of WorkManager: 'wm/SOAWorkManager'] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000K1mQe8WAdL9_rdH7iY1I2CVn0000Lc,0] [APP: soa-infra] Error -: B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error[[
Error -: B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessageImpl(Engine.java:3143)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1650)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4042)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3718)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3205)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:677)
        at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:211)
        at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
        at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
        at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)

It is a Defect 17324828 has been created. Details for this defect maybe viewed in Oracle Support Portal , we will update you the status as soon as we have more information.
I found ,Bug 16713853 : BTMLR: IGNORE CORRELATION AS TRUE IN ADMIN COFIGURATION GIVES NULLPOINTER ERROR for this issue in 11G , As of now development team is still working to fix this , i will raise a New BUG and involve development team for this issue

Handling Fault Messages for JDBC Receiver (Syn Inbound)

Dear Freinds,
Can we handle fault messages for JDBC Receiver which is synchronous.
OB Proxy Syn <> IB JDBC Syn
1. How to handle the same ? Please give some examples.
2. Should we use Stored Procedures at Oracle side to handle the fault messages and send back as response to the Proxy Response. Will it work.
Thanks & Regards
K.Ramesh

Dear Friend,
I have 2 interfaces where Proxy is OB & JDBC is IB. In the first interface both sender and Receiver are synchronous and in the second one it is Async.
In the first interface i have to send one field from R/3 table along with Native SQL query string to XI and the response of the SELECT query is sent back to the sender.
Assume if no fields are selected based on the field sent then proper error message has to be sent instead of the response message.
In the second interface i will be using UPDATE query at Asyn JDBC receiver.
How to do this if you are having JDBC Receiver.
I saw in many blogs where they had mentioned that we cannot handle fault messages in the Receiver JDBC.
KIindly explain.
Thanks
K.Ramesh

How to handle different message types of EDIFACT in single input file.

Hi All,
Currently we have a requirement like we will be receiving the input with different messages in the same input file (eg: ORDERS and ORDRSP in the same file).
We have configured both the message types in the document definitions. One more thing is the versions of the messages are different.
When we pass the input we are getting the error.
The input looks like below,
UNB
UNG
UNH*ORDERS
UNT
UNE
UNG
UNH*ORDRSP
UNT
UNE
UNZ
Please assist us to overcome the error.
Thanks,
Ravindra.

Hi Prasanna,
Thanks for your reply.
I have created the agreements for both the messages still i'm getting the below error,
B2B-50037
B2B inbound message processing error
If i give the input as separate messages (i mean 2 input files). Its working fine.
Also let me know is there any configuration settings to handle multiple messages in a single input file.
Thanks,
Ravindra.

MDM adapter Non-XML Inbound Messaging

Hi all,
I have a scenario where I transport a csv file via PI (NW711_05_REL) to MDM using the File adapter (sender) and MDM adapter 7.1 7.1 (receiver).
The message is sent through to the MDM port fine, and it seems to choose xml as default file type and PI MSG ID as file name.
This results in an xml file with csv content.
As I want to put the file on the port with its original file type (csv) and name, I need to tweak the MDM adapter a bit. For this I have tried to find MDM specific modules, but have been unable to do so.
I have found a u201Cwork aroundu201D by using u201CSet Adapter Specific Message Attributeu201D on the sender file adapter u2013 described on help.sap.com
Configuring the sender file adapter as described in http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmdm71/helpdata/en/48/9854884d3217cee10000000a421937/content.htm i am able to set the "FileName" attribute in dynamic configuration.
This enables me to get some of the desired effect, as the file on the MDM port is now a csv file u2013 half way there!! However the file name remains PI MSG ID...
Am I missing something here or is the adapter not working as intended? I donu2019t understand why it should only use the file type when the entire filename and type is there. I would assume that the entire filename and extension would be used in the MDM port.
I have tried achieving the desired result by using the "AF_Modules/DynamicConfigurationBean" on a JMS adapter, but the result is the same.
I would like to avoid developing my own custom module to handle this, as it seems like it should be possible to handle in a more standard way.
I hope someone out there can help me out, and hope to see a lot of good replies.
Best Regards,
Jesper

have you gone thur these settings?
Non-XML Inbound Messaging
When the backend system uses the PI File Adapter sender as the communication channel to deliver messages to the PI server, and the receiving MDM channel corresponds to an inbound MDM port of type other than XML (for example, Flat text file), then you must enable the File Adapter Specific Message Attribute named File Name as follows:
       1.      Edit the corresponding File Adapter sender communication channel.
       2.      In the Advanced tab, choose Set Adapter Specific Message Attribute.
       3.      Choose the File Name.
       4.      Save and activate the changes.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmdm71/helpdata/en/48/9854884d3217cee10000000a421937/frameset.htm

Axis adapter receiver handle fault message

Hi
We have a Sync interface which makes a Proxy call from ECC to PI 7.3 and then PI makes Soap(Axis) Sync call to Web sevice. We are having issues when handling SOAP 1.2 fault message.
Below is the actual fault response from Webserver:
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
   <env:Header/>
   <env:Body>
      <env:Fault>
         <env:Code>
            <env:Value>env:Receiver</env:Value>
         </env:Code>
         <env:Reason>
            <env:Text xml:lang="en">FaultMsg</env:Text>
         </env:Reason>
         <env:Detail>
            <ns2:servicefault xmlns:ns2="https://hostname.de/webservice/0400-0005">
            </ns2:servicefault>
         </env:Detail>
      </env:Fault>
   </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>
But PI receives this response like system error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapterFramework</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MESSAGE">GENERAL</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: FaultMsg</SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:Stack />
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I checked this way http://scn.sap.com/thread/1675917 but it doesn't fit for Axis adapter.
Please let me for any clues how to handle this fault response.
Regards, Dzmitry

Hi,
I'm working with Dzmitry on the issue since last week. After analyzing the implementation and checking some SAP notes I came to the following conclusion:
According to note 856597 the fault behavior of axis adapter is as follows:
" A: The receiver adapter expects a SOAP message as response. For
synchrnous calls, a successful response should be returned with
HTTP 200. In this case, the content of the SOAP body will be
returned to the caller as the response payload. When some error
occurs, the SOAP message may contain the SOAP fault element. In
this case, when the fault detail element is not empty, its
content will be returned as the fault payload in an application
error message. For others, a system error message will be
returned to the caller."
The example shows a SOAP 1.1 fault message with a "detail" node being mapped to an application fault.
As we are using SOAP 1.2 the namespace as well as structure of the fault defers. I assume that the module responsible for the transformation from AXIS message to XI message within the module chain does not recognize the detail node on out soap 1.2 fault.
Therefore the solution would be to insert a custom AXIS handler before com.sap.aii.axis.xi.XI30OutboundHandle mapping the soap 1.2 fault to a soap 1.1 fault.
Is there something like a short how to on how to implement Axis handler and how to deploy it. Sap help only says to package it into sda file....
Thanks a lot in advance!!!
BR,
Eugen

EDIFACT D98A Inbound Message Processing Error

Hi
I have been setting up an EDI B2B G/W using 11g B2B PS3 (Host & Partner). I have created the ECS, XSD and XML files using the B2B Document Editor and have completed the partner setup for D98A Purchase Order.
I had the issues when I posted the PO where the Host is unable to pick up the agreements and I was getting B2B-51507 Payload Validation Error and the message was failling at the B2B Host.
Later I changed the payload in-line with the below thread and removed the Internal Properties
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=11039032#11039032
upon which the messages was sent to RemoteTP but failed with B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error
When I analyzed further I could see the InternalPropertes sent by the Host to the RemoteTP are with empty values.
I would like to understand the point of removing the InternalProperties and why B2B Host is not sending it in the right format to the other B2B.
I am pasting the file that is been received at the RemoteTP which failed with B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Transaction-CONTRL xmlns="urn:oracle:integration:b2b:9FF110DDDB0C424F8B4C5A0F73EF6547" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" XDataVersion="1.0" Standard="EDIFACT" Version="D3" CreatedDate="2013-05-31T13:41:20" CreatedBy="XEngine_2133" GUID="{65236268-C9EF-11E2-BC04-E4115BAD2692}"><Internal-Properties><Data-Structure Name="Interchange"><Lookup Name="InterchangeControlVersion">1</Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeReceiverID"> </Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeReceiverQual"></Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeSenderID"> </Lookup><Lookup Name="InterchangeSenderQual"></Lookup><Lookup Name="Standard">EDIFACT</Lookup><Property Name="InterchangeSyntaxVersion">1</Property><Property Name="ReleaseCharacter">0x3f</Property><Data-Structure Name="Group"><Lookup Name="GroupID">CONTRL</Lookup><Lookup Name="GroupReceiverID"> </Lookup><Lookup Name="GroupReceiverQual"></Lookup><Lookup Name="GroupReleaseNumber">3</Lookup><Lookup Name="GroupSenderID"> </Lookup><Lookup Name="GroupSenderQual"></Lookup><Lookup Name="GroupVersion">D</Lookup><Property Name="GroupID">CONTRL</Property><Data-Structure Name="Transaction"><Lookup Name="TransactionID">CONTRL</Lookup><Lookup Name="TransactionMessageReleaseNumber">3</Lookup><Lookup Name="TransactionMessageVersionNumber">D</Lookup></Data-Structure></Data-Structure></Data-Structure></Internal-Properties><Segment-UNH><Element-0062>#ControlNumber(Transaction)#</Element-0062><Composite-S009><Element-0065>CONTRL</Element-0065><Element-0052>D</Element-0052><Element-0054>3</Element-0054><Element-0051>UN</Element-0051></Composite-S009></Segment-UNH><Segment-UCI><Element-0020>1051</Element-0020><Composite-S002><Element-0004> </Element-0004></Composite-S002><Composite-S003><Element-0010> </Element-0010></Composite-S003><Element-0083>4</Element-0083></Segment-UCI><Loop-Group_3><Segment-UCF><Element-0048>1051</Element-0048><Composite-S006><Element-0040> </Element-0040></Composite-S006><Composite-S007><Element-0044> </Element-0044></Composite-S007><Element-0083>4</Element-0083></Segment-UCF><Loop-Group_4><Segment-UCM><Element-0062>1</Element-0062><Composite-S009><Element-0065>ORDERS</Element-0065><Element-0052>D</Element-0052><Element-0054>98A</Element-0054><Element-0051>AA</Element-0051></Composite-S009><Element-0083>4</Element-0083><Element-0085>18</Element-0085></Segment-UCM></Loop-Group_4></Loop-Group_3><Segment-UNT><Element-0074>5</Element-0074><Element-0062>#ControlNumber(Transaction)#</Element-0062></Segment-UNT></Transaction-CONTRL>
Has anyone encountered such issues? Is there any additional properties that are needed to be configured?
Regards
RD

Hi Anuj
this is the stack trace
<02-Jun-2013 12:50:47 o'clock BST> <Error> <oracle.soa.b2b.engine> <BEA-000000> <Error -: B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error
Error -: B2B-50037: B2B inbound message processing error
at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessageImpl(Engine.java:3283)
at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1764)
at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4179)
at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3855)
at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3328)
at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:610)
at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:192)
at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:183)
at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
the xml i posted is the one that is logged by the remote TP in the trace logs before the error occurrence,
Regards
RD

Inbound Message Fails with Send Exp"

We are on 10.1.2.0.2 and tryting to test (ebms ) outbound/inbound messaging with a trading partner. The outbound from us to TP works great, but on inbound from the TP we are seing the following errors: (This works on 10.1.2.0.0)
Machine Info: (devb2b.helenachemical.com)
Description: B2B adapter general error
StackTrace:
Error -: AIP-50031: B2B adapter general error: Error -: AIP-50025: Repository error : Error -: AIP-50547: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME] "DEST Partnre", To party[NAME] "SOURCE Partner", Business action name "SendResponseEnd"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1735)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2294)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:2193)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:2148)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:500)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:348)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Caused by: Error -: AIP-50025: Repository error : Error -: AIP-50547: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME] "DEST Partner", To party[NAME] "SOURCE Partner", Business action name "SendResponseEnd"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementNameByBaTPType(RepoDataAccessor.java:1852)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:167)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:495)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processIncomingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:226)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleExceptionBeforeIncomingTPA(Engine.java:3568)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1614)
     ... 6 more
Caused by: Error -: AIP-50547: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME] "DEST Partner", To party[NAME] "SOURCE Partner", Business action name "SendResponseEnd"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementNameByBaTPName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2176)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementNameByBaTPType(RepoDataAccessor.java:1839)
     ... 11 more
Any ideas on what is different in the newer version of B2B
Thanks
PT

Hi Ramesh,
Found this issue- in the new release the Business Action name and choreography name must match to work with TP on custom document over ebms.
We still have issues,,, the TP's that are working currently on 10.1.2.0 are no more working. For example:
The following wire envelope was sent from one of our TP:
--MIME_boundary
Content-ID: <1dac9c73-bba3-4fc3-a756-0134872b03d2ebxml-Header>
Content-Type: text/xml
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?><soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:eb="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xsi:schemaLocation="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/envelope.xsd"><soapenv:Header xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"><eb:MessageHeader eb:version="2.0" soapenv:mustUnderstand="1"><eb:From xmlns:axis2ns1561="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"><eb:PartyId xmlns:axis2ns1562="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd" axis2ns1562:type="DUNS+4">8097318700000</eb:PartyId></eb:From><eb:To xmlns:axis2ns1563="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"><eb:PartyId xmlns:axis2ns1564="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd" axis2ns1564:type="DUNS">0070367590000</eb:PartyId></eb:To><eb:CPAId xmlns:axis2ns1565="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd">OrderCreate</eb:CPAId><eb:ConversationId xmlns:axis2ns1566="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd">7229ce0c-4b6a-419c-b301-ef28708fda68</eb:ConversationId><eb:Service xmlns:axis2ns1567="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd">uri:OrderCreate</eb:Service><eb:Action xmlns:axis2ns1568="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd">SendResponseEnd</eb:Action><eb:MessageData xmlns:axis2ns1571="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"><eb:MessageId xmlns:axis2ns1572="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd">1dac9c73-bba3-4fc3-a756-0134872b03d2</eb:MessageId><eb:Timestamp xmlns:axis2ns1573="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd">2008-05-28T10:33:55Z</eb:Timestamp></eb:MessageData><eb:DuplicateElimination xmlns:axis2ns1574="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd" /></eb:MessageHeader><eb:AckRequested eb:signed="false" eb:version="2.0" soapenv:mustUnderstand="1" /></soapenv:Header><soapenv:Body><eb:Manifest eb:id="Manifest" eb:version="2.0"><eb:Reference eb:id="Payload-1" xlink:href="1dac9c73-bba3-4fc3-a756-0134872b03d2-body1" xlink:type="simple" /></eb:Manifest></soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope>
On the Ack, B2B is sending the following:
SOAPAction="ebXML"
Content-Type=multipart/related;type="text/xml";boundary="----=_Part_29_18537968.1211985238867";start="<ebxheader-0A27EBC811A2FF31B3B00000C6520000>"
Content-Length=1744
------=_Part_29_18537968.1211985238867
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-ID: <ebxheader-0A27EBC811A2FF31B3B00000C6520000>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:eb="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd" xsi:schemaLocation="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/envelope.xsd http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"><env:Header><eb:MessageHeader env:mustUnderstand="1" eb:version="2.0"><eb:From><eb:PartyId eb:type="ebMS Identifier">0070367590000</eb:PartyId></eb:From><eb:To><eb:PartyId eb:type="ebMS Identifier">8097318700000</eb:PartyId></eb:To><eb:CPAId>SendResponseEnd</eb:CPAId><eb:ConversationId>7229ce0c-4b6a-419c-b301-ef28708fda68</eb:ConversationId><eb:Service>urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-msg:service</eb:Service><eb:Action>Acknowledgment</eb:Action><eb:MessageData><eb:MessageId>Helena Operating Unit@0A27EBC811A2FF31B4400000C6530000</eb:MessageId><eb:Timestamp>2008-05-28T14:33:58.000Z</eb:Timestamp><eb:RefToMessageId>1dac9c73-bba3-4fc3-a756-0134872b03d2</eb:RefToMessageId></eb:MessageData></eb:MessageHeader><eb:Acknowledgment env:actor="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-msg:actor:toPartyMSH" env:mustUnderstand="1" eb:version="2.0"><eb:Timestamp>2008-05-28T14:33:58.000Z</eb:Timestamp><eb:RefToMessageId>1dac9c73-bba3-4fc3-a756-0134872b03d2</eb:RefToMessageId></eb:Acknowledgment></env:Header><env:Body/></env:Envelope>
------=_Part_29_18537968.1211985238867--
They send us Service: uri:orderCreate; Action: SendResponseEnd; CPAID: OrderCreate.
We send in the Ack:
Service: urn:oasis:name:tc:ebxml-msg:sercice; Action:Acknowledgment: CPAID:SendResponseEnd
Where is it pulling the CPAID? or why is it using the Business Action Name?
The message shows complete on our side, but does not get completed on TP side, and since they are they are the initiator they retry 2 times befoer they stop and this is causing duplicte errors on our side. They are using Nexus ebms engine.
Any info on this is appreciated. We are using ebms 2.0
Thanks
PT

Emulation inbound message problem

Hello.
I try to emulate call operation in my BPEL process. Operation is defined as synchronous two-way operation in WSDL. But when I create test with emulation inbound message I see in log this:
<2008-02-19 10:16:54,136> <ERROR> <default.collaxa.cube.bpeltest> <com.collaxa.cube.engine.test.PartnerEmulation$ScheduledPost::execute> scheduled post failed
com.oracle.bpel.client.ServerException: IDeliveryService.post() invoked for twp-way operation 'orderAccept'. This method can only be used to invoke one-way operations which don't return any messages. Please check the WSDL which defines this operation and use the method IDeliveryService.request() to invoke a two-way operation
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.delivery.DeliveryHandler.post(DeliveryHandler.java:98)
     at com.collaxa.cube.ejb.impl.DeliveryBean.post(DeliveryBean.java:201)
     at com.collaxa.cube.ejb.impl.DeliveryBean.post(DeliveryBean.java:156)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.JAASInterceptor$1.run(JAASInterceptor.java:31)
     at com.evermind.server.ThreadState.runAs(ThreadState.java:646)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.JAASInterceptor.invoke(JAASInterceptor.java:34)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.TxRequiredInterceptor.invoke(TxRequiredInterceptor.java:50)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.StatelessSessionEJBObject.OC4J_invokeMethod(StatelessSessionEJBObject.java:87)
     at DeliveryBean_RemoteProxy_4bin6i8.post(Unknown Source)
     at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.post(DeliveryService.java:195)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.test.PartnerEmulation$ScheduledPost.execute(PartnerEmulation.java:531)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.test.PartnerEmulation.emulatePost(PartnerEmulation.java:339)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.test.PartnerEmulation.emulate(PartnerEmulation.java:396)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.wmp.BPELReceiveWMP.perform(BPELReceiveWMP.java:181)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.performActivity(CubeEngine.java:3672)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.handleWorkItem(CubeEngine.java:1650)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.instance.PerformMessageHandler.handleLocal(PerformMessageHandler.java:75)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleLocalMessage(DispatchHelper.java:184)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.sendMemory(DispatchHelper.java:276)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.endRequest(CubeEngine.java:5658)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.handleWorkItem(CubeEngine.java:1726)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.ejb.impl.CubeEngineBean.handleWorkItem(CubeEngineBean.java:306)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor52.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.JAASInterceptor$1.run(JAASInterceptor.java:31)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396)
     at com.evermind.server.ThreadState.runAs(ThreadState.java:648)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.JAASInterceptor.invoke(JAASInterceptor.java:34)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.TxRequiredInterceptor.invoke(TxRequiredInterceptor.java:50)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.StatelessSessionEJBObject.OC4J_invokeMethod(StatelessSessionEJBObject.java:87)
     at CubeEngineBean_LocalProxy_4bin6i8.handleWorkItem(Unknown Source)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.instance.PerformMessageHandler.handle(PerformMessageHandler.java:45)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleMessage(DispatchHelper.java:138)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.BaseScheduledWorker.process(BaseScheduledWorker.java:70)
     at com.collaxa.cube.engine.ejb.impl.WorkerBean.onMessage(WorkerBean.java:86)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor31.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.SetContextActionInterceptor.invoke(SetContextActionInterceptor.java:44)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
     at oracle.j2ee.connector.messageinflow.MessageEndpointImpl.OC4J_invokeMethod(MessageEndpointImpl.java:297)
     at WorkerBean_EndPointProxy_4bin6i8.onMessage(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.j2ee.ra.jms.generic.WorkConsumer.run(WorkConsumer.java:266)
     at oracle.j2ee.connector.work.WorkWrapper.runTargetWork(WorkWrapper.java:242)
     at oracle.j2ee.connector.work.WorkWrapper.doWork(WorkWrapper.java:215)
     at oracle.j2ee.connector.work.WorkWrapper.run(WorkWrapper.java:190)
     at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:814)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
What can I do?

I found this problem similar to
BPEL Testcase with pick-activity
How to emulate invoke in BPEL process test
Problem is how to change mind of BPEL testsuite to use IDeliveryService.request() instead of IDeliveryService.post().
I found on metalink that is a real bug. But there is a workaround with external call.

[svn] 1751: Bug: BLZ-174 - MessageClient.testMessage() is incorrectly doing a string compare for the subtopic header of an inbound message against the subtopic value (which may contain wildcards) that the Consumer is using.

Revision: 1751
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-05-15 14:21:43 -0700 (Thu, 15 May 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: BLZ-174 - MessageClient.testMessage() is incorrectly doing a string compare for the subtopic header of an inbound message against the subtopic value (which may contain wildcards) that the Consumer is using.
QA: No - customer verified the fix.
Doc: No
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-174
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/core/src/java/flex/messaging/MessageClient.java
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/core/src/java/flex/messaging/services/MessageService.java

If you create a metadatatype with a single metdata block, and you reference that in your vm/cm cell attribute using a *one* based index, Excel seems to see the link and it honors it when saving the spreadsheet.
So, I ended up with something like:
<c ... cm="1"/> (I'm dealing with cell metadata, but the concept is equivalente to value metadata)
<metadataTypes count="1">
  <metadataType name="MyMetaType" .../>
</metadataTypes>
<futureMetadata count="1" name="MyMetaType">
  <bk>
    <extLst><ext
uri="http://example" xmlns:x="http://example"><x:val>87</x:val></ext></extLst>
  </bk>
</futureMetadata>
<cellMetadata count="1">
  <bk><rc
t="1" v="0"/></bk> 
</cellMetadata>
Hope this helps.

Handling inbound messages in B2B

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for