Has Pacman3 dropped support for the NoUpgrade Lines in pacman.conf?

I just upgraded to Pacman 3. When I upgraded I quickly saw some output on my sceen saying it was doing a one time "reset" and I believe it said I could delete the NoUpgrade lines in pacman.conf.
I noticed that pacman.conf.pacnew does not have any NoUpgrade lines.
Should I delete all the NoUpgrade lines from my pacman.conf file?
Is the NoUpgrade line no longer supported in pacman3?
If so, how can I protect some of my config files from being overwritten during upgrades?
Rob

They're still supported, there just aren't any by default anymore. They were redundant.
You can/should remove any that are listed in the "backup" list for the packages they come from (pacman -Qii package). Those are all handled as if they were in NoUpgrade anyway.

Similar Messages

How can I enable the automated drop down for the subject line on the email page

How can I enable the automated drop down for the subject line on the email page as I send more than 300 emails everyday with the same subject line. Before it use to happen in my gmail account but now its not. Please help me as its increasing my work time because I have to type the subject line again and again on each email I send. Please help me guys.

This is usually caused by one or more bookmarks having a long title.
You can check that folder in the Library and shorten long names.
* Bookmarks > Show Al Bookmarks
*Bug 626066 - History, Bookmarks menus too wide because of pages with long titles on 64bits
<i>Please do not comment in bug reports: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html</i>

Why have Nokia dropped support for the 808?

It never gets anything, still waiting for NFC payment, Wifi is still borked with no 5ghrz support even tho it was advertised, still waiting for browser updates to make it useful, gets nothing they're putting into their Lumia series.
Why release a phone to just ditch it?
Edit: Oh yeah and the camera is still **bleep** for night time shots, the right hand side of the picture always has this lighter area ruining it.
Not my pictures but mine does the same thing...
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/808-920/808-car.jpg
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/808-920/808-pumpkin.jpg
920:
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/808-920/920-pumpkin.jpg
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/808-920/920-car.jpg
So far every picture I've seen online his this blob of light, yet the 920 is fine. So it isn't just my phone :\

miffywiffy wrote:
It never gets anything, still waiting for NFC payment, Wifi is still borked with no 5ghrz support even tho it was advertised, still waiting for browser updates to make it useful, gets nothing they're putting into their Lumia series.
Why release a phone to just ditch it?
Edit: Oh yeah and the camera is still **bleep** for night time shots, the right hand side of the picture always has this lighter area ruining it.
Not my pictures but mine does the same thing...
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/808-920/808-car.jpg
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/808-920/808-pumpkin.jpg
920:
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/808-920/920-pumpkin.jpg
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/808-920/920-car.jpg
So far every picture I've seen online his this blob of light, yet the 920 is fine. So it isn't just my phone :\
Are you crazy? The 808's pictures are better. Sharper no overzealus coloursmearing, no weird edge-sharpening.
In fact the only positive about the 920 is its low-light "enlightenment" . But this unfortunately gives rather unatural looking photo's.
The pictures that you linked to were shot in pitch black outside and Steve clearly pointed out that the scenes depicted were deliberately choosen to asure the 920 would be better. They were to demonstrate the difference of the low-light enhancing technology o/t 920. There's no reason to show them here to demonstrate a malfunctioning camera-module. In fact I can show you pictures that show the superiority o/t 808 (even from that same site).
e.g.
Lumia 920 http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/bigshoot/920church.jpg
808PV http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/bigshoot/808church.jpg
Lumia 920 http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/bigshoot/920tesco.jpg
808PV http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/images/bigshoot/808tesco.jpg
On these 2 examples you clearly see that the 808PV is better then the 920 (and the last scene should have been the 920's territory and yet it fails miserable)
Also the worse experience with software upgrades also happens on Lumia users. Some have the feeling that their camera's perform worse after their latest upgrade. It seems Nokia still FU this process just as any other manufacturer does.
Or do you really think that Xperia users (or Galaxy users or HTC users) have different experiences? the Apple fora are filled with people unhappy about the things that got broken after their last update.
I am glad that Nokia still delivers (minor) updates. I too would like to see Nokia give power users more options instead of removing them. Just like the awfull light grey theme. They should have included BOTH dark and light themes to give us CHOICE! The only thing we can do is ASK Nokia to release the dark theme as a seperate product/download. Or make a suitable theme ourselves. ;-)
the same with all the other options. In fact IMHO Wifi is NOT BORKED, I've never seen them advertize 5Ghz band and as for the browser, it IS very usefull. It's the only one with (limited) Flash support build in (Android has removed Flash support in later builds so who are you to complain) and is quite fast (just disable javascript to make it as fast as the Iphone 4S). That website creators can't build proper websites anymore without stupid javascript is not Nokia's fault, complain to the site-maintainers.
And as for Nokia's Lumia range of devices... they still can't do halve of what a N8 can do, even WITH a "borked" Belle Refresh...

When will LabVIEW Drop Support for the NXT?

We currently use LabVIEW to program LEGO NXT kits in our engineering courses. However, LEGO is phasing out the NXT within the next year or two. Does anyone know the LabVIEW/NXT life cycle plan, i.e., when will LabVIEW no longer support the NXT platform?

Hi Joel777,
NI doesn't currently have a definitive roadmap for future NXT support in LabVIEW, but I recommend you check out the community page for updated modules. I would also recommend adding any feedback you have regarding future releases to this page in the comments section and periodically checking this page for support updates.
Rick C.

Dropped support for high-def dvd?

Does anyone know if Mavericks dropped support for the HD DVD format offered by Compressor 3?
A DVD authored with this format will not play on an iMac (2.4 Intel Core 2 Duo) running Mavericks, but will play on a Mac Pro (2x2Ghz Dual-Core Intel Xeon) running Mac OS 10.6.8. Other DVDs play fine on the iMac.
Thanks in advance for any information regarding this.

The CalDigit card is not rated to work on the NEWEST MacPros...the ones with different processors and other internal circuitry. It works fine on previous models. The big reason I suggest the Caldigit card over the rest is:
1) It is half the price with all the same features
2) It can be installed and removed by the customer. The Apple card can only be installed and removed by a certified Apple dealer.
Now, Raid 5 is good as it offers PROTECTION...where RAID 0 does not. If one drive dies, the RAID 5 still works. If the same happened to Raid 0, all info is lost...ALL. Raid 5 will lower the capacity of all the drives, as it uses one for this protection, where Raid 0 is larger. Give and take.
FYI...I cut DVCPRO HD and ProRes on internal drives...no raid. Firewire 800 drives are good for this format too. Raids are only needed for multiple streams of ProRes, and the uncompressed formats. And for protection.
Shane

Has anyone experienced this problem: I am editing in FCP 7.0.3 on a Mac 10.6.8 - I have a clip in the browser that is full frame and matched the other clips but when I drop it in the time line it becomes a fully zoomed in version of itself

has anyone experienced this problem: I am editing in FCP 7.0.3 on a Mac 10.6.8 - I have a clip in the browser that is full frame and fine and it matches the other clips in my bins but when I drop it into the time line it becomes a fully zoomed in version of itself and I can only see a small portion of the image. What's going on? I've noticed this has happened in the past randomly with other clips and it's driving me cray cray! Any help appreciated greatly and thanks in advance for taking the time

In the FCP Browser, click on the source clip that is showing up sized incorrectly to select it. Once it is selected, type Command + 9 to see the item properties for the clip. Either report those properties here, or take a screen shot of the item properties and post the screen shot here.
Next, click anywhere in your sequence timeline and then type Command + 0 {zero} to see your sequence settings. Either report those settings or take a screen shot of the sequence settings and post that screen shot here.
MtD

The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions....When inserting during trigger in linked server

Hi All,
I am getting below error while inserting into Linked Server (sql2012) thru trigger from sql2008 ....However if i insert the same thru Store Procedure it is inserting successfully....MSDTC service is started on both sql server machines....also both machines
rebooted....but still i am facing this error.
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX.XXX.XXX.XX" returned message "The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions.".
Msg 7391, Level 16, State 2, Procedure ins_test, Line 11
The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX.XXX.XXX.XX" was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
Could assist to resolve.
Regards
Shehzad

Hi SHzKhan,
According to your error message, we need to verify if you configure the MSDTC correctly, When you have more than one SQL Server involved in a Distributed Transaction, you need to make some changes to the default configuration of MSDTC for these distributed
transactions to succeed. There is a detail about recommending MSDTC settings for using Distributed Transactions in SQL Server, you can review the following article.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2027550/en-us
There is a similar issue about error 7391, you can refer to the following link.
http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/30235/msg-7391-distributed-transactions-dtc-on-sql-server
Regards,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

ACR 8.7 has been released with support for the Nkon D750. Why no Lightroom support yet?

ACR 8.7 has been released with support for the Nkon D750. Why no Lightroom support yet? Am I wrong or was support for the D810 available far more quickly?

ACR 8.7 has not yet been released. The ACR 8.7RC has been released. It is a Release Candidate - and as such, is not a final version. I wouldn't be concerned about a lack of Lightroom support until a final version is released.
Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 8.7 Release Candidate | digital camera raw file support - Adobe Labs

I am using NIPCI6229 card i want to generate 5 V in the digital ouput line . it has to be there in the output line only for 100ms please help me

i am using NIPCI6229 card i want to generate 5 V in the digital ouput line . it has to be there in the output line only for 100ms please help me. aftwer 100ms it has to go to zero state

hi,
You can try generating 5V continously for 100ms in a loop later on you can make it low.
Hope this helps you.

Why no support for the Leica M9 in LR 2.6 RC?

Hi - bemused that there's no support for the M9 in this release (especially as LR is bundled with the M9). Even more confusing as the Standard Adobe calibration profile for the M9 that comes with the LR3 Beta is pretty good (beats the embedded profile that comes with the Leica DNGs) - and this can be added to the LR2.5 profile library with a bit of copying and pasting.
I'd be grateful to hear from Adobe if there's any chance of a good M9 profile making it to the 2.6 final version. Seems a shame to miss this opportunity.
Thanks
Chris Tribble

Hello Chris,
thanks for the nice feedback.
For the moment, I will use LR for the fast preview of all images,
cataloging etc., and RawDeveloper for the fine tuning, as often as the
image permit it.
(sorry for my english!)
Lets hope that we will get through all that without loosing our
perfectly nice temper !
All the best to you,
Alain
Le 11 déc. 09 à 09:39, Chris_Tribble a écrit :
Alain - 1eme - je suis un particulier - aucun fonction chez Adobe.
Aussi -
je m'excuse d'avant pour mon Francais bottant et sans elegance! Je
n'ai
jamais fais des etuded en francais - et aussi mon clavier anglais
manquent
les diacritiques...
>
Quelque petit reponses.
>
>>>> First I have installed the 2.6 version, that is said to work
>>>> alongside the 2.5... but of course, it has replaced it. How to
>>>> reinstall the 2.5 alongside, hase they have the same name ?
>>>
>>> C'est pas la peine - 2.6 est meilleur - vous pouvez rester
>> avec ca...
>
>> ok, mais c'est tout de même juste le contraire de ce que
>> disent sur le site Adobe vos notes d'installation (rien de
>> très neuf non plus en cette matière, hélas, quant aux infos
>> approximatives ou manquantes d'Adobe)
>
CT: Pas vrais je crois - Version 3 beta peut co-exister - mais 2.6
doit
remplacer 2.5...
>
>>>> And then, I have tried to find a M9 profile, read your
>> posts, do my
>>>> job, install the beta 3.0, fond the "M9 Digital Camera Adobe
>>>> Standard.dcp", put a copy of that in any cameraRaw description
>>>> files... and so what ? In 2.6, I only have the choice between
>>>> "embeded" (=incorporé in french) and "Adobe standard" when
>> I select a
>>>> M9 dng file / but I've more choice when I select a M8 dng
>> file (ACR
>>>> 4.4, ACR 3.6, Adobe standard, Adobe standard beta 2,
>> camera standard,
>>>> camera standard beta 2).
>>>> 1. Do I miss something ?
>>>> 2. what should I do to find and use the M9 specific profile ?
>>>>
>>
>>>> Encore une fois - il n'y a pas de probleme...
>>> "Adobe Standard" marche tres bien...
>> moui... si vous le dites... mais il me convient assez mal, et
>> j'aimerais tout de même comprendre pourquoi je ne peux pas
>> charger un profil correspondant à mon M9... je ne comprends
>> pas non plus pourquoi il n'y a pas de profil par optique
>> développé par Leica... et en Suisse, personne de chez eux ne
>> peut répondre à ces questions... alors même que LR 2.5 est
>> livré en bundle avec le m9!
>
CT: Alors - Adobe Standard EST le profil developé par Adobe pour le
M9 - et
c'est le meme qu'on trouve dans LR 3 beta. Selon mon experience c'est
meilleur que le "embedded profile". Pas parfait, mais pas mal non
plus
Vous pouvez vous meme telecharger le DNG editor
(http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles).
>
>
>> je suis professionnel, et très loin d'être heureux avec LR...
>> (ni avec aucun raw developper, pour être franc, ni
>> captureOne, ni... encore que justement, RawDevelopper a des
>> qualités intéressantes - à côté de grande faiblesses... mais
>> c'est encore un autre sujet)
>>
>> mais j'ai bien l'intention de m'accrocher, ne serait-ce que
>> pour la puissance de gestion/catalogage et l'interface de
>> LR... quoi que je n'ai aucune confiance en son bricolage des
>> dng -> donc multiplier les backups des fichiers tels que
>> sortis du m9, etc... on dirait bien que malgré 15 ans
>> d'expérience, nous en soyons toujours au balbutiements du digital !
>>
>> C'est tout de même plus sérieux (du point de vue des
>> résultats) du côté de Leaf (j'utilise un L75 sur Alpa
>> 12SWA)... ça ressemble à quelque chose, mais en petit format,
>> après le m8, le m9 est vraiment encore loin du compte ! Et
>> leur développeur, bien sûr, ne développe... que leurs
>> fichiers propriétaires. Lorsque quelqu'un aura décidé dans
>> quelques années que leur format .mos est dépassé, mon travail
>> sera tout simplement perdu. Sauf à convertir en catastrophe
>> quelques dizaines ou centaines de milliers de fichiers ?
>> Encourageant, n'est-ce pas ?
>>
>>> By the way, I also had this blue pixels lines in the 2500iso
>>>>
>>>> files... anyway to save back the file without this bug ?
>>>
>>> Je ne vois pas cette image .... Peut etre vous pourriez
>> m'envoyer par
>>> email? (mailto:mailto:mailto:[email protected])
>> Je ne l'ai malheureusement pas avec moi, sur mon portable, et
>> n'y accéderai plus avant quelques jours...
>>
>> Leica Suisse (avec qui je suis en relation directe et qui a reçu ce
>> fichier) vient de m'appeler et ils reconnaissent - enfin - le
>> problème.
>> Mais ils ne savent toujours pas si et comment il vont le résoudre.
>> Rien avant l'année prochaine, quoi qu'il en soit, et ce sera
>> fixé, selon eux, soit :
>> - par un nouveau firmware (difficile à croire)
>> - par un passage de l'appareil entre leur mains, avec modif/
>> remplacement d'une partie du soft/hardware
>> - par un échange d'appareil (!!!) si c'est le capteur qui est
>> en cause (l'un de mes M8.2 avait été échangé de même à leur
>> frais après 3 mois, pour d'autres problèmes électroniques) Le
>> problème de ces lignes de pixels bleus sur certaines prises
>> de vue en haute sensibilité est largement débattu sur les
>> forums, et Leica vient de comprendre qu'il n'est pas
>> extérieur au M9, comme ils le disaient il n'y a pas si
>> longtemps... encore une petite bombe à leur actif !
>> Dite-moi si ça vous intéresse et je vous les ferai suivre...
>
CT: J'avais un tel probleme avec le M8.2 - chez le M9 pour le moment
ca
marche!
>>
>> Par ailleurs, ils viennent de me proposer de repasser toutes
>> mes optiques au banc (codées par leurs soins il y a moins
>> d'un an) pour les ajuster une nouvelle fois au mieux au m9...
>> là aussi, ils reconnaissent des failles techniques sérieuses
>> ! J'ai par exemple un summicron 35 asph parfait sur film et
>> sur m8, qui est... flou (sur les bords, et irrégulièrement)
>> sur mon m9 ! Interressant...
>>
CT: c'est vrais que les boittier numerique sont plus exigeant - je
conseil
un contact direct avec Leica a Solms.... Et aussi (si vous n'y etes
pas
inscrit deja) que vous faites appelle pour rejoindre le reseau Leica
Professional. Ca vaut la peine et augment le vitesse de reparation...
>
>>> Je vous conseiller aussi de visiter L-camera forum...
>>> (http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m9-forum/
>>> ) Vous y trouverez des francophones la bas et il y a beaucoup de
>>> bonnes informations...
>> je connaissais, mais les questions en français trouvent
>> rarement de l'écho... et le niveau technique n'est
>> malheureusement pas très élevé, malgré la gentillesse des
>> interlocuteurs.
>>
>
Oui! MAIS j'ai appris des choses la bas ...
>
>>> Bon courage!
>>> Chris
>>
>> Il en faut, en effet...
>> merci en tout cas !
>> (à propos, quelle est votre fonction chez adobe ? Puis-je
>> reprendre contact avec vous lors de mes prochaines
>> découvertes ?) Amitiés, Alain
>>
Encore une fois - bon courage..
>
Dr Christopher Tribble
MOBILE     || +44 (0)7917 473522
EMAIL     || mailto:[email protected]
WEB     || www.ctribble.co.uk
>

Firefox dropping support for optgroups?

It seems that Firefox 4 has dropped support for <optgroup> elements? Why would such a great web development browser do this? Also, the box model has changed with this release.
Not good guys.

Plugin are installed outside the control of Firefox and Firefox usually scan specific registry keys to find a specific plugin.
As long as MS makes a Silverlight plugin available for Firefox then you can use Silverlight in Firefox.

Why does firefox drop support for a plugin with an update

Why the H*ll does Firefox drop support for a plugin when there is an update in Firefox.
FF4 has reported that 6 of my plugins that work fine in 3.6 are now not supported. !! This is a joke, and happens regularly.
As a user (a highly IT literate one) this is annoying and frustrating, and from a design standpoint, unprofessional.

Plugins as in Flash, Java, quicktime or such or do you mean Extensions ?
Plenty of Plugins seems to be detected and in use by Firefox 4.0 just fine according to your system details by your post.
If you meant Extensions then check for updates, look at addons.mozilla.org or the Extension homepage for to see if the author has provided a update.
Generally Extensions can need anywhere from a simple maxversion bump to a lot more for it to work properly on a new Major version of Firefox depending on what the Extension does.
It is professional actually as extensions that were not actually compatible may actually cause problems big or small if they were to still just ''work'' in a new Major version release so hence the need for them to be properly up to date on any changes and hopefully the extension author is quick about it.

Can you please put me in touch with the support for the trial copy of adobe acrobat XI pro which I had tried out on March 15 for 30 days. I have been trying to cancel since the cost is too much and Acrobat Reader is OK for me. I can't find uninstaller.

Can you please put me in touch with the support for the trial copy of adobe acrobat XI pro which I had tried out on March 15 for 30 days. I have been trying to cancel since the cost is too much and Acrobat Reader is OK for me. I can't find uninstaller.
I have had to erase my disk since then with trouble with Apple Store not recognising my machine and the reload from Time Machine has given complications . Can you please cancel my trial and return my Trial money.

If you paid for what you used then it was not a trial.
Look thru the following links and use the chat option if required for your situation:
Cancel your membership or subscription | Creative Cloud
https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cancel-membership-subscription.html
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1703848
Chat support - For the link below click the Still Need Help? option in the blue area at the bottom and choose the chat option...
Creative Cloud support (all Creative Cloud customer service issues)
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-ccm.html ( http://adobe.ly/19llvMN )
Phone support | Orders, returns exchanges
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/phone-support-orders.html

Why no RAW support for the Fuji FinePix HS10?

This camera is well over a year old. Why is there no support for the RAW file?

It is definitely not only Fuji. I used a Panasonic Lumix FX-150 before that has been supported by Adobe Camera Raw for quite some time now. I replaced that camera by a Lumix LX5, but I see that the FX-150 is still not supported by Apple Camera Raw and probably never will.
If you want wide range RAW support, use Lightroom. (Not to say that Aperture doesn't have its strengths, e.g. support for geocoding.)

Microsoft Word Has Not Been Installed for the Current User

Hi, everybody
I'm just starting our attempt to put together ZfD app packages for MS Office 2007. I've tried 2 different route with poor results for each. I'm looking for guidance and suggestions and, hey really, the simple final solution. :)
Objectives: Each app package will install locally one of the Office apps (e.g., Word) if it is not installed and then launch it, otherwise it will launch it. It gets installed locally to the C: drive using all the MS default choices, but runs from the desktop ZEN/NAL shortcut. All desktops are XP, not Vista or W7.
Routes tried and failed...
1) Simple app, uses distribution and run scripts to figure out if already installed, then installs using network shared drive and config.xml file for just the one app. The result ought to work -- no particular error in the package, those are fixed -- but what happens is something different each time with the MS setup.exe, and it never does complete without its own error (various and different each time). So, this appears to be completely unreliable because launching MS's setup.exe from a simple app is unpredictable and incomplete.
2) Snapshot of a successful setup.exe and config.xml install. This ALMOST works... well it does in fact work but the snapshotted app gives an error once it finishes launching -- "Microsoft Word Has Not Been Installed for the Current User" -- and exits. From the research I've done on this message, the MS program sees the "wrong" Windows profile on the destination environment, compared to that in the snapshot, and figures it's now been installed from a bootleg copy of Office 2007.
At this stage all I can think of is expletives. We've paid for everything, I've followed all the usual and customary steps, played by the rules, been polite (and also used the necessary computer swear words), and now I just want to insult everyone in Microsoft's marketing department for ruining everyone's life yet again. Can't we just do this, is it too much to ask!?!
Please help me. What is really going to work for distributing and maintaining Office 2007 apps using our ZfD environment? ALL USEFUL SUGGESTIONS WELCOME. Thank you. Bless you.
-Kent S.
Be strong as a ship and wise as a whale

These questions are really best in the Microsoft Office Forums.
These are MS Office Questions not ZEN Questions.
Novell did not design Microsoft's Office Install.
I have nothing against snapshots, but it does not work great with the Office
installs, which you yourself know since you are posting here with problems
based on that.
And your other method you are trying with the break out is not working well.
We also know that from experience.
We can tell you that the way most people install it and the way most people
succeed doing it, is by doing it the way recommended and designed by
Microsoft.
ZEN does that just fine.
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Knowledge Partner
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.
"KentFSmith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Thank you, Grimlock (-Grimlock?-)
>
> Through a google search I encountered a very close suggestion, and the
> poster said they couldn't remember the name of a MS utility but that
> there was one that would break out the individual MSIs from the Office
> 2007 setup.exe bundle. The dependent app appears to be a simple and
> possibly elegant solution, but without a good way to break out the MSIs
> I don't see how to do anything other than with a config.xml ('Config.xml
> file in the 2007 Office system'
> (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../cc179195.aspx)).
>
> Do you know of that utility and where I can find it?
>
> There is a lot of history here now of just doing the individual
> applications. Everyone gets Word and Excel, but much fewer get
> PowerPoint and Access. All other reasons aside, a compelling one is the
> reduced number of help calls to the Help Desk here. Occasionally we
> also just run the whole Office install for someone who needs some of the
> odd utilities, but that is easily cost-justifiable for us to break them
> out as exceptions. Otherwise, we focus 90% of our support on just Word
> and Excel and it pays off nicely.
>
> If we switch to putting full Office 2007 on all PCs then there may be a
> better approach that include other tools than ZfD, such as the fact that
> we replace 1/3 of all PCs in the organization each year (so that no
> hardware is more than 3 years "behind"). We could put 1/3 of all Office
> 2007 installs into the new PC image. But we still need to support all
> the use of the apps after the install, so ZfD MUST work well, it simply
> MUST work well or we're screwed, to use the vernacular. Also, just
> switching from what we've been doing for years -- single app orientation
> -- means introducing new-ish issues that have to discover and explain to
> our comrades, and to adjust our orientation with unknown future costs.
>
> But that may end up being the simplest adequate solution. And that's
> what I want.
>
> -K
>
> grimlock;1883526 Wrote:
>> Craig Wilson wrote:
>> > You should really focus on #1.
>> > Snapshot is not the way to go.
>> >
>> > Details about what is Not working or what random behavior may help
>> folks.
>> > Ask in the MS forums may help too. dont' mention zenworks.
>> > Just say you are installing as Administrator from a share and getting
>> these
>> > errors.
>> >
>> > While not 100% accurate, it should be good enough to get some good
>> feedback.
>> >
>>
>> Nor is installing 1 app at a time. Install the whole suite, have an
>> icon for each app that runs the exe for that app with a dependency on
>> the another app that points to the installer msi.
>>
>> If any user runs any app, it will run if the executable is there
>> (meaning it's been installed). If the executable is not there then it
>> calls the dependent application (the installer app) and installs it,
>> and
>> then runs it.
>
>
> --
> KentFSmith
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> KentFSmith's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=2927
> View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=391573
>
>

Has Pacman3 dropped support for the NoUpgrade Lines in pacman.conf?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for