Help! Why do my images look overly sharp and appear to download?

I recently updated CC and now my images look overly sharp when I'm batching or working at a smaller size. When zoomed in at 50% they look fine. Is there any way to fix this? It's very difficult to work with everything looking so warped at a smaller scale. Also, when I open a file after batching and running an action it appears to "download" line by line instead of just opening. What is going on?

When I am batching multiple images and running actions, I don't want to view them at 100% they are huge files. 24 megapixels, on average 60.5M and 3925x5945 at 300 dpi. That's REALLY zoomed in. I was not having this issue with CC until I updated it and now everything looks warped at a smaller scale. I want to know why it changed and how to change it back.

Similar Messages

  • HELP, why does saved image look too sharp when re-opened in Photoshop but normal in Windows viewer?

    Been using Photoshop Elements 7 for several years and this has never happened before!  I applied sharpening to an image and saved two copies: PSD and JPEG.  When I re-opened the PSD file it looked WAY over-sharpened.  In Photoshop Editor I then opened the JPEG and it too looked way over-sharpened.  But the strange thing is that when I view the JPEG in the Windows Photo Viewer it looks normal!  Just as it did when I originally saved it.   I decided to try an experiment.  I opened the PSD file that now appears overly sharpened and saved a new JPEG.  I then opened the new JPEG in Windows Photo Viewer -- and it looks normal, even though it was saved from the PSD file that looks over-sharp!  I then opened the same, newly saved JPEG in Photoshop -- and it now looks oversharp and distorted, just like the PSD file.  Can anyone tell me what is going on here?  I'm completely confused!  Hope someone can help me figure this out.  Thanks!

    The over sharpening may have caused a color shift.
    You might have better luck using the adjust sharpness command. Enhance<Adjust Sharpness.
    Skip down to "Precisely sharpen an image" on the help page listed below for info on adjust sharpness command.
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/PhotoshopElements/7.0_Win/WSAC75B090-7431-4b74-B4DC-C5B02EBC4C BF.html
    Here are a handful of links which might be of use about USM.
    http://photocritic.org/unsharp-mask-sharpening-photos-photoshop/
    Note: You will not be able to do the manual USM segment in the above article as Photoshop Elements does not include the Apply Image Command. It does give some start settings to try out.
    http://www.photokaboom.com/photography/learn/Photoshop_Elements/sharpening/USM_2_amount_ra dius_threshold.htm
    http://www.naturescapes.net/122004/tg1204.htm
    http://www.earthboundlight.com/phototips/unsharp-mask.html
    USM for haze removal added as it can be a useful thing to know:
    http://www.lonestardigital.com/photoshop_quicktips.htm
    Several sharpening methods discussed including highpass sharpening.
    http://www.photokaboom.com/photography/learn/Photoshop_Elements/sharpening/1_sharpening_in troduction.htm
    Highpass sharpening:
    http://www.essential-photoshop-elements.com/high-pass-sharpening.html
    http://nyfalls.com/article-photoshop-high-pass-sharpening.html

  • Why do my images look washed out...

    Why do my images look washed out after I have worked in Photoshop CS6 and saved them in Finder? I have been a Photoshop user for a while now and have never experienced this problem. It started 2 months ago and no one can seem to tell me why or how to fix it. I am a professional photographer and I have clients waiting on their images but I can't send them looking as horrible as they do. My workflow is: drag and drop an image from iPhoto or Finder to Photoshop. I change things like levels, contrast, image size and use the healing too. Then I save to Finder so I can upload to dropbox or to website or burn to a DVD. Now when I save the image the thumbnail looks washed out, without color and looks horrible!!! I don't know if my photo files are corrupted or ? If I open the image in Photoshop or Bridge it looks fine. I would be grateful for any suggestions or explanation. Things were working just fine, but not now.

    Examining the image direct from the camera of the child on the beach, using http://regex.info/exif.cgi  there is a small embedded thumbnail (with black bars top-and-bottom to letterbox it to the LCD aspect ratio), and a small preview probably used for zooming in on the camera LCD screen, and the fullsize jpg image all contained in the one JPG file.  All three of these seem to have identical histograms other than the black-bars causing a dark peak on the thumbnail image, but otherwise the shapes of the histograms and the position of the peaks from light to dark are the same. 
    In other words the full-size JPG and the embedded preview and thumbnail all seem the same other than size so the darkened version seen in Finder is not coming from the camera.  The one issue the above website reports is that the camera JPG has a color-profile tag (name of the profile) but does not actually contain the color profile, itself.  All other versions of the image have an actual embedded profile not just the name in a tag.  It is possible that this is confusing Finder into assuming a different profile or gamma curve for the image that sRGB warrants, but most all camera images have this issue so I wouldn't expect a Mac to show images from all cameras as too dark.
    It is a mystery to me why the Finder preview looks darker, but at least in the one side-by-side provided, it does, and is different-looking than all other representations of the image from what I can see.
    At the beginning of this thread you said you were worried the photos coming out of Photoshop were washed out and had bad colors.  From my perspective, what comes out of Photoshop looks the same as what comes out of the camera, so only Finder has it wrong.  Are you seeing the darker image anywhere else besides Finder (and perhaps iPhoto which we don't have a screenshot of)?
    Most importantly does the image you see on screen in Photoshop, while you're making adjustments, look dark like the pre-PS Finder thumbnail or does it look lighter, like the post-PS Finder thumbnail and all the images on DropBox? 
    If more than just the pre-PS Finder thumbnail is darker then you may have a monitor calibration issue that needs to be addressed, otherwise just ignore the pre-PS Finder thumbnail when evaluating if the image needs any adjustments and assume they are all ligher than the Finder image.
    BTW, I tested for a sRGB vs AdobeRGB mismatch, and if an sRGB image is assigned an Adobe profile then the colors become more intense but the whole image does not become darker so that can't explain what is happening. 

  • Why do my images look good in PSE8, darker & more saturated in browsers, etc.?

    I've been creating some images using PSE8. The images look good, bright in PSE8. But the files, when saved as jpgs or as tifs appear darker and have more intense color when viewed through web browsers and Windows Picture & FAX Viewer. (the total effect is, the images look different, worse.) The same images on the same computer viewed on the same monitor look different in PSE8 and when viewed through other programs. This is not a printing problem, per se. The files print as they appear on the browsers etc. when I print them through PSE8. This is a problem that happens consistently with many different images.
    It seems as if PSE8 is interpreting the files uniformly differently than these other programs. HELP!!!

    I don't know what the eRGB profile is -- where did you find it?  Usually there is a profile with the name "sRGB IEC61966-2.1" or something very similar.  If your Windows is insisting on a default profile for your display, that's the one to set it to.
    Your issue almost certainly is caused by a defective color profile.  PSE 8 is a "color managed" program, which means that it uses the color profile associated with your display to reproduce colors more accurately on the screen.  If the color profile is defective, and you adjust a photo in the Editor to look right, then the adjusted photo won't reproduce accurately when you view it through a non-color-managed program (Windows viewer, browsers) or on another system with a proper color profile.
    So to fix this issue, you need to either remove the profile entirely (not sure why Windows XP won't let you do that) or associate "sRGB" to the display.

  • Why is the image not as sharp in library mode then it is in develop mode?

    and the image i email reflects the library image/version (less sharp) not the develop mode image/version.

    I just open my MBP before plugging up the TB display.  Then after the TB comes on, I close the MBP back into clamshell mode.  Works better for me that way. 
    Does that work for you as well?
    -Brad

  • Images 1-19 sharp and clear, images 20-138 fuzzy and pixelly ??????

    I printed out a book I am working on yesterday - 138 pages. There is an image on every page. From page 1 to 19 the images are crisp and sharp and look to be the correct 300 dpi. From 20 to 138 the images are blurry and pixelly and look to be 72 dpi or less. I looked at the PhotoShop files and they are 300 dpi and I tried placing another one and it still is fuzzy.
    I am assuming that I must have accidently changed a setting. Does anyone have a guess as to which one it could be? Thanks.
    Loretta

    Hmmmm.
    I am using CS version 3.0.
    Links panel shows no links 20-138.
    Also no Effective resolution.
    So I guess that for whatever reason they are not actually linked. I don't know why I could place them and see them but they are not really there.
    I will try and re-place these this afternoon. I've been doing this for 2 years and this has never happened. Oh well.
    Thanks,
    Loretta

  • Why are my photos not as sharp and clear in online album

    I've been struggling thru this make-an-album thing and will not given up. I have continued to work thru this first album to be posted on line. I'm almost there. I've sorted thru the templates and only found one that shows my photos large enough to see and appreciate but they seem to be degraded - not sharp and clear. And that template cuts off my captions to the photos. I just want a slideshow, full screen, full resolution and with all my captions. I thought that was what Photoshop Elements 8 and my Adobe acct allowed me to do.
    I take a lot of pixs with a Pentax K20D at 14.5M.  I have not been able to share any of my photos, as taken, thru my email because they are too big.  Now it looks like PS8/Adobe dumbs they down.
    I'm new to this....so what am I missing????
    Rebecca

    Get SmugMug photo sharing. For a few dollars a year your photos will look fantastic. It is much better value and has unlimited storage unlike Photoshop.com and the full screen slideshow with captions look even more impressive on widescreen monitors.
    What's more, you can upload photos to your SmugMug albums directly from the PSE Organizer.
    http://www.smugmug.com/

  • Why does iTunes delete all my music and then re-download (not all of) it when I sync?

    So, I plugged my phone into my PC, and it loaded on the iTunes screen. I then went into the device and removed a couple of playlists from the phone (it had run out of space). When I then hit sync, rather than just removing the playlists and syncing to update anything that needed updated, it bloody well deleted ALL my music and then started downloading it again. We are talking about around 30-50GB of music. Not only this, but it appears to NOT download all the tracks on my playlists so I'm left with half the music I should have.
    I have had this happen before and last time it totally screwed up my phone leaving me with the only option of completely reinstalling iOS7. Has anyone else had this happen? Is it fixable?  Not only this, but I am aware of "manage music manually" but have no idea where it is or how to activate it. I'm just bloody sick of apple! Why can't they get their **** together and fix these little bugs. I love their hardware but they clearly have too many ego driven tossers programming their software who don't think fixing issues is their problem!
    Any help would be most appreciated as it's driving me up the bloody wall! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP!

    I'm not sure why this happens, but I found a workaround. Below the album title it will list the artist(s). The issue seems to happen when there are multiple artists. For example, an Album titled "Over the Sea to Skye" has The Chieftains and James Galway as artists. Some tracks (for whatever reason) will list only one of these and result in the playlist showing what appears to be multiple albums. You can click on the artists and it will highlight. Paste in what is appearing on the other "albums" and it will then show as one:
    Hope that is somewhat clear enough to help. Doesn't fix whatever the issue is but it is a workaround. For me this is only happening with CD's that I have imported.

  • Why cant i download music in the Uk the same time as the USA why do we have to wait weeks and weeks to download music when other countries can download it straight away?

    #itunes store. Why cant i download music in the UK the same time as in the USA? Why do we have to wait weeks and weeks to downloand music when other fans can dowload music in other coutries when it is released in the US?

    Itunes can only provide what the owners of the distribution rights to the music provide.
    If the owner of the rights do not provide it, then itunes cannot sell it.
    You would have to ask the owners of the distribution rights in each country why they do not provide them at the same time.

  • Why when I resize an image does it looks less sharp and poor quality?

    I've been using Photoshop since CS3 and have never had thus problem before. I used to create websites using WordPress for clients and have created many different logo images without any issues. Now however I'm doing it for muself and I'm having problems when I resize the images for web use.
    Here are a few examples. The first is a 1400x1400 image that I'm going to use for a podcast. iTunes requires this size and it looks good to my eye. When you look at the resized image however you'll see that it is not quite as sharp.
    1400x1400 http://d.pr/i/SrtJ
    300x300 http://d.pr/i/IqtI
    Logo at http://safetydad.net
    Twitter page http://twitter.com/thesafetydad
    I've tried all different things to get it to look good at any size but no mater what when the image gets resized (especially by a CMS or Twitter) it looks like crap. I've tried saving as png, jpeg, flatteing before resizing, resizing the psd, saving as jpeg then resizing, using save for web option but no matter what it doesn't look right.
    What am I doing wrong?

    When you scale down, you will lose some of the sharpness because it is removing pixels from the image, and Photoshop is trying to figure out how to remove pixels, and reassemble the edges of the image.. As a result, when some of that shading is removed, it begins to blur. Make sure when scaling down an image (image - image size) that you set the resampling to bicubic sharper. This will help to reduce the blur from the pixel removal.
    Also, you can go to filter - sharpen - unsharp mask - and work on bringing back some of the sharpness there as well.
    For your twitter logo - I would make a separate logo for it, because the text is difficult to read over it. Sorry - just my opinion there.
    You may have tried these things already - but if not - hopefully it helps
    On the other note - I think you might be hyper-critical of the changes...

  • Why do my images look blurry when opened in photoshop?

    Hi! i was just wondering if i could get some help with a problem i've been getting since yesterday.
    Before yesterday morning, my photoshop was working just fine but then yesterday morning when i opened this image.
    It would look like this
    instead of it looking like the first image above, the thing though is when i export the image from photoshop as a png, jpeg or any other it looks normal again like this.
    This is the first time this has ever happened so i'm not really sure about what to do.
    I'm using photoshop cs6 and i've also uninstall and reinstall photoshop about 2 times now but it doesn't fix it
    so if anyone can help me that would be great.
    Thanks.

    ssprengel wrote:
    The screenshots you’ve posted look very similar to me, but they are all composed of tiny dots not a continuous-tone image.
    Yes.  They don't make any sense to me either.  Are we supposed to be looking at a blank dark gray rectangle, or has the upload process failed the OP ?

  • Why are my images looking oversharp/pixelated when opened in CS from LR

    When I open up my images in CS from LR they look oversharp when zoomed out to view the whole image.  You can see it in her hair in this image
    When I zoom in closer it looks fine
    Any idea how to fix this?
    TIA!
    Amanda

    What is there to fix? When zoomed out that far, your monitor can not display all the pixels needed. If you could fix anything, it would be increasing your screen resolution assuming it is even possible. Most video cards have a hard coded limit just like the monitor has a limit. To go beyond those limits would require purchasing a new card and/or monitor.

  • Why does the image look faded?

    Hi all
    I have a photoshop image that is quite black - when I cut & paste it into indesign it looks correct, however when I drag or place the image in, it appears a bit faded.
    Does anyone know what might be causing this?
    Thank you

    (but the preview is still affected)
    When there's transparency on the page the soft proof is via the transparency blend space profile—your document's CMYK profile if it is CMYK. It's the same as turning on Overprint Preview. If your placed image is RGB the preview is showing you what will happen when it converts to document CMYK.
    In Photoshop you can get the same preview by setting the Working CMYK profile to match your ID profile and turning on Proof Colors.

  • Why does my image look wrong in liquid layout?

    I'm making a site for an artist and tried using a liquid layout in CS5. I also made one in fixed like I usually do. The width on both is 1260 and the header image on both is 1260 px wide.
    On the dh5 (fixed) one, the header is centered. On the dh7 (liquid) one, the image, which is a title, is moved slightly to the left. Is this fixable or should I just stick to fixed layouts?
    dh5: http://bethniebuhr.com/dh5.html
    dh7: http://bethniebuhr.com/dh7.html
    Thank you.

    Hi
    The problem with the header in the semi-liquid layout, (not liquid as it has a max and min width) is that being an image it has a fixed height and width and this is causing your problems.
    Using images in liquid and semi-liquid layouts requires a completely different work-flow to what is required in a fixed layout as one must allow all the images to expand within their designated areas and ensure they still retain their aspect ratio, all of which is possible but will require much more work in learning that that normally required.
    PZ

  • Why do my images become very desaturated and the exposure changes every time I paste them to a blank page? The originals are so vibrant and warm by comparison.

    Hi,
    For work I always paste 3 images of varying sizes onto the same page in photoshop. This wasn't an issue and always looked great when I did it in ps5, but since upgrading to ps6 they always paste flat, desaturated and underexposed. Put side-by-side with the original they look terrible. 
    This is something I desperately need to resolve as I show this small collection to my customers and potential customers.
    I've changed my color settings in an attempt to sort this out, but this has made absolutely no difference.
    Thanks in advance
    Kimberly

    RGB is not a color space, it's a color model. Color spaces are sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto RGB etc.
    Since you're apparently not familiar with these concepts, you should work consistently in sRGB, which displays roughly right in all scenarios even in the absence of color management.
    The default color space out of Lightroom (if you haven't changed it) is ProPhoto, which can quickly get you into trouble unless you know what you're doing. Change it to sRGB in Lr Preferences > External editing.
    Don't change Photoshop color settings! That will quickly get you into an even bigger mess than you are now. Reset it to default settings and don't touch them again until you know more. What you need to change is Lightroom "Edit in Photoshop" color space.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Issue with editable alv using  cl_gui_alv_grid

    Hello all, its a table update program . user can save create new entry and delete the entires . the screen should be avaiable for multiple time inputs by the user . i achived it by  method handle double click and i am refreshing the scrren and making

  • Upload image into mysql database residing on  remote server is not working?

    hello to all, i need ur help,we hav online site . i have to upload image(which can b from any pc) into mysql database residing on remote server of which we (don't hav actual path of that server). the solution i'm using is working correctly on local b

  • How to add a user to the wheel group?

    How to add a user to the wheel group in leopard?

  • Can't see OS X disk while booted into OS 9

    There are a couple of apps I really need to use, that won't run in Classic; they won't go past 9.0.4. I have OS X and the OS 9 stuff on separate physical drives. The OS X "Startup Disk" pref will let me select the OS 9 system OK, but once there, the

  • Only video stream don't work

    Hello With DSS 5.5.3 the mp3 streaming works fine, but my video don't work anyway. No error messages, no problem in logs, I see my own conexion for video on the server but with 0kbs input and 0kbs output. I try this with my local loop adress (rtsp://