Hi Everybody, Ship to party not updating for Transaction number in "CRMD_ORDER" for some users?

Process :
1. We are updating ship to party for contracts(Transaction number ) , Here every thing is updating fine But i am facing the issue in CRMD_ORDER, Here what ever selected ship to party was not updating.
2. i have find out the issue reason for failure  in  Debugging , its giving error as "  no_display_authority " in one standard function module  'CRM_ORDER_READ'.We are passing Header GUID to this FM .
3. Even i went inside this FM 'CRM_ORDER_READ', Here it was checking for ACE(ACCESS Control ENGINE) authority check by using Standard FM
  "CRM_ORDER_CHECK_AUTHORITY_ACE"  this FM giving error as "Access denied by Access Control Engine".
Can any help me on this how can i resolve this issue.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Venugopal

Hi,
Go to SPRO - SD - BASIC FUNCTIONS - PARTNER DETERMINATION Just check whther your partner function (SH) is assigned to your account group and also exists in the partner determination procedure.
Just try and maintain it there against your account group and against your sales document type in VOV8.
Also open your customer master for which you are trying to create this sales order. Just check whther in the partners tab , SH is shown? You can either use transaction BP or XD03.
Let me know, reward points if helpful.
Regards
Ravi

Similar Messages

  • SHIP TO PARTY NOT DEFINED FOR CERTAIN SALES AREA

    Hi ...
    I am creating a specific type of sales order in va01 by reffering a billing document . But soon after entering billing document no it is showing " SHIP TO PARTY NOT DEFINED FOR CERTAIN SALES AREA..." The sales area --- which it's showing in error it is quite different ....it's not that one what we used for it in that ref billing document .
    Note : We are maintaining ship to party  , sold to party ..... in CRM only
    Their also I checked it is assigned properly .Relatioship with sold to party is also OK .
    But in R/3 I have checked that ship party is created in VD01 Where as sold to party is created in XD01 .
    PLS ADVC

    Dear Sundar,
    Please check in these areas
    1.Check the sales area which you are trying to create sales order and copying invoice sales area is same or not.
    2.Why you haven't created ship to party in XD01 transaction.
    You go to XD01 transaction exetend the customer master then try.
    3.Check the customer master(Ship to party) is available under which sales area.
    I hope it will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Ship-to party not defined for sales area

    Hi all,
    I am really confused while creating a sales order, I need your help.
    My sales org. - 1083, distribution channel - CY, Division - CW.
    When I enter va01, in the initial screen I enter the above details. Then it goes to the create sales order screen where I enter my customer details.
    After that, I enter my material number and quantity, it is giving me an error ship-to-party not defined for sales area 1084 CY and ZO ( other division) instead of 1084 CY and CW.
    Where did I mess up ?
    Thanks,
    -Chandru

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO - SD - BASIC FUNCTIONS - PARTNER DETERMINATION Just check whther your partner function (SH) is assigned to your account group and also exists in the partner determination procedure.
    Just try and maintain it there against your account group and against your sales document type in VOV8.
    Also open your customer master for which you are trying to create this sales order. Just check whther in the partners tab , SH is shown? You can either use transaction BP or XD03.
    Let me know, reward points if helpful.
    Regards
    Ravi

  • Ship to party not defined for sales area x/y/z

    Hi Friends,
    While creating sales order I am getting following error---
    Ship to party not defined for sales area x/y/z .Please help to overcome this problem.
    xsales organisation  ; ydistribution channel ; z--division
    Regards

    Please go in Transaction XD01- Create Customer.
    then in Account Group, Select Sold to Party.
    Assign sales area , xsales organisation ; ydistribution channel ; z--division
    and check.
    Hope thiswill solve your problem

  • Why apple was not update facetime call over the cellular for iPhone 4?????

    why apple was not update facetime call over the cellular for iPhone 4?????

    Facetime will not use the cellular network (if using AT&T) for the iphone 4, 4S or 5 unless you have signed up for ATT's new data share plan. They stated this several weeks ago when there was talk about Iphone5/IOS 6 and Facetime. Your carrier is the one that decides if Facetime will work over the cellular network or not. You might want to contact them. Your other option is to continue using it via wi-fi.

  • I have apps that will not update that have been like that for a while.. why wont they updat?

    I have apps that will not update that have been like that for a while.... why will they not update???

    Yes apps are stuck on "waiting" one has been like that for a month and my other ones still wont download

  • I had downloaded and used Final Cut Pro 7 (studio 3) on my mac, but it died. Can I download it to my new computer without buying a new copy? I'm not sure of the number of installations for academic copies. How would I do this?

    I had downloaded and used Final Cut Pro 7 (studio 3) on my mac, but it died. Can I download it to my new computer without buying a new copy? I'm not sure of the number of installations for academic copies. How would I do this?

    AH...good. 
    There is no limit on the times you can install it from the DVDs. There's just a limit as to being able to run it on multiple machines AT THE SAME TIME. If your old computer dies, or you sell it (please reformat the drive so they don't get FCP for free), then you can install on a new computer fine.  And you are allowed to install on (1) desktop and (1) laptop at the same time as well...but only use it on one machine at any given time. Meaning you can use it on the desktop at work, and then when away from the office, on your laptop.
    Long story short...you can install it fine without any issues.

  • FAGLF101-Account determination for transaction V02 is missing for account

    Morning
    When I run the "faglf101" transaction, i get this error : 
    "Account determination for transaction V02 is missing for account 0000401142
    Y1 PCG                                                                     
    Message no. FR005       "
    I have tried to customize the adjustments accounts and postings keys in the IMG
    "Financial accounting > Accounts Receivable and payable >
    Business Transactions > Closing >Regrouping > Define adjustments
    accounts for changes reconciliation accounts".,  but i don't see the part "Regrouping" in the IMG.
    I have tried to use the OBBW transaction, but his transaction code "A00-Transfer postings: changed recon. acct" don't correspond to mine (V02);
    We are in ECC6.
    Can somebody explain to me how can i correct this error please?
    Best regards

    This is meant for account determination for Receivables/payables sorting. Check your configuration in SPRO->General Ledger Accounting (New)->Periodic Processing->Reclassify->Transfer and Sort Receivables and Payables->Define Adjustment Accounts for Receivables/Payables by Maturity

  • Ship to party not copied from PR to PO for item category D

    Gurus,
    Am populating unloading point and ship to party in a PR for both item category standard (" ") and service ("D"). However during PR conversion to PO, both these fields only get copied for item category standard and NOT for item category service. What is the correct set up so that these fields are copied from PR to PO during PR conversion ? Any customizing point i missed ?
    Cheers
    Olivier

    HI,
    I think this is the wrong forum to proceed with this.
    SAP Community Network Forums » SAP Solutions » SAP Solution Manager
    Regards

  • Proper value of ship to party not geting picked up for a given sold toparty

    Hello,
    We have a   bdc program which passes data to the VA01 transaction. We are passing partner values like sold to party and ship to party using this program. However when we open our order, the value of ship to party is getting replaced by the value of sold to party. We debugged the program but could not find out the reason. This problem is there only for one sold to party value. It is working fine with other values of sold to party. We feel it is some master data setting for this particular sold to party that is responsible for this behaviour.
    Please let us know incase you have any possible suggestion.
    Thanks in advance.

    Harsh is right, need to check your partner functions tab in the sales area view of the customer master. There should at a bare minimum be one reference to function SH and a number. If there is more than one ship-to then your program must have logic to derive what is right ship-to to be used. I am wondering if this is the case and your program is defaulting to first SH available, that being the sold-to number. Please review and advise.
    Thanks,
    Jay

  • Error:Ship to party not defind for sales area

    Dear Friends,
    I created a material for sales area 1000/10/00.
    The division that i assignes was 05 in MMD.
    Now when i create a order the system gives a messege "ship to party 1033 not defind for sales area 1000/10/05, but at the order initial screen i had given sales area 1000/10/00.
    Where is the problem?
    regards
    debasish

    Extend or create the customer to the sales area 1000/10/05 or change the division in the material as" 01" then ur problem will solves.
    Regards,
    kishore.
    Edited by: kishore gopala on May 13, 2008 1:12 PM
    Edited by: kishore gopala on May 13, 2008 1:26 PM

  • Ship to party not assigned to sales area

    Hi everybody
    When I am creating sales order for a customer in the sales area into which it's CMR is maintained  eg. 1000, 10 , 00. I get an error message ' ship to party...is not assigned to sales area 1000, 10, 01.'' Here SP is also SH.
    I checked the common Distribution Channel & common Division Master Data & the ref dc & ref dv are properly maintained. I don't know from where system is taking division 01.

    Hi,
    Please check VOV8(Sales documet type control).Here in the document type which you are using,check if Item condition field is marked.If it is marked then system is checking the division of the material you are using.
    Extend the customer to 1000/10/01 and then try creating the order.
    Reward points if useful
    Regards,
    Amrish Purohit

  • Ship to party not populating in segment in whsord idoc

    HI,
    we are creating two delivery with ship to party as 52004 and 56003 (two different sales orders with differnt sold to ). the deliveries are trigerring outbound whsord idoc. The issue is in the segment E1ADRM1 segment for WE qualifier , in the field, " Partner_id", the ship to party 52004 and 56003 is not populated. Rather a constant value 32500000789 is populated in "partner_id " field in both deliveries
    Our Abaper is not willing to identiy the same since it is s standard idoc.
    Pls can you help as to w hy ship to 52004 and 56003 is missing in partner_id field and some other value 32500000789 is coming ? all other deliveries are created ok.
    rgds
    Pamela

    Hi Pamela,
    can you Please share some more information like IDoc details. so that v can analyze more.
    Regards,
    VSN

  • Ship to party not assigned to sold to party still can i create a sale order

    Hi ,
    For example i have a ship to Party B who is not assigned to Sold to Party A . System is allowing me to create a sale order for the above mentioned "Sold to" and "ship to"  combination. What is the logic behind this ? is it a provided functionality or a bug?

    hi,
    for example if you are using account group 0001, when you create a customer it has the ability of picking up a SH, BP and PY along with SP. this is the underlying config at account group. Now for SP 100 the ship party can 100 or 200 ... or you can modify at the order level. Its not necessary that 200 has been identified at the customer master creation level itself. But partner function SH shoudl be availble in the account group with which the customer is created.
    regards
    sadhu kishore

  • ECC Customer Ship to party not showing in BP relationship in CRM

    Hello Experts,
    The sold-to party 1111 and ship-to 100 are downloaded to CRM 6.0 from ECC 6.0
    We have maintained this SHIP to PARTY - 100 for a sold-to party 1111 in ECC in the partner function tab in XD02. In this case BDoC got generatedin CRM, it is showing GREEN also, but still the ship-to 100 is not showing in the RELATIONSHIP button of BP - 1111 in CRM.
    Please advice what will be the reason? Any note, web blog , any specific settings to be checked?
    Regards

    Hi
    Yes, the BDoC type is BUPA_REL and it shows fully processed (showing in GREEN) in CRM system.
    But still the relationship (ship-to party) is not shown in RELATIONSHIP for BP in CRM.
    Any pointers?

Maybe you are looking for

  • User EXits

    can any one help me out as how to find the USER EXITS , or INCLUDES in functional module for any enhancement Cheers

  • BT engineer call out causes chaos

    Hi, I'm currently in dispute with BT regarding a £130 engineer call out charge that has been applied to me bill. The charge relates to a call out where an engineer visited to try and resolve a poor quality line.  In the process he disconnected our in

  • Error -36 when trying to read an avi file on a smb network drive

    Hello, I am connected to a network harddrive through a samba connection. The problem occurs after the connection, when I try to read a file an error -36 occurs. I have check that my connection and the network disk belong to the same windows group. Th

  • Bad execution plans when using parameters, subquery and partition by

    We have an issue with the following... We have this table: CREATE TABLE dbo.Test ( Dt date NOT NULL, Nm int NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT PK_Test PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (Dt) This table can have data but it will not matter for this topic. Consider this query (t

  • File Share for Meeting

    I produce a monthly meeting packet using Adobe 9 that I currently load on a USB key, mail to the director attending the meeting and then collect right after the meeting. The material in the packet is confiential and my goal is to limit access to that